Filed under: South Wales Police, Machine Gun, MAPPA, IPCC, David Sissling, Failed Disclosure, Abuse of Process, NHS WALES, Professor Rodger Wood, Dr Bruce Fergusson, Dolmans
Substantial Cash offered for whereabouts and info on Steve, Shawn and Andrew TRIGG believed to be police officers, plus any others, in Cardiff and Barry in pasty years my tel 07907937953
IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY
COURT BS 614159-MC65
CF101741 CF204141
BETWEEN:
MAURICE
JOHN KIRK
Claimant
and
THE
CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES POLICE
Defendant
CLAIMANTS POSITION
STATEMENT
19th April 2013
Witnesses currently being sort by Private Investigator
include:
Police or ex
police officers
Steve Trigg
Shawn Twigg
Andrew Twigg
Detective Inspector Steve Parry
Detective Inspector Runnells
PC Ridley
Past Stipendiary
Magistrate ]
Ms Watkins of Dinas Powys
Clerks of the Court
Ms J Caress
Ms R Jones
Crown Prosecution
Service
Stan Stoffa
Jackie Seels
Other witnesses
Anthony Gafael ex Claimant’s ‘tenant’
Mrs Dawn Kenyon late of D&K Insurance
Sue Jenkins ex flying instructor
Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police
As the seventh week of a three month trial is coming to an
end I am now more confused and muddled up then ever over as to which police witnesses
are relevant and for which of the thirty five incidents they belong! These last two week’s had been particularly full
of surprises but nothing quite like yesterday!
I, for example, was
granted permission to tape record, on my own recorder, ‘witness evidence’ starting
with one of the police officers in my, twelve years ago, collapsed ‘Dangerous
Driving’ jury trial at Cardiff Crown Court.
A hand written ‘jury
note’ had been passed to the then judge, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, all
twelve complaining of a Barry police
inspector from the well of the court, no less, was repeatedly signalling to the
police officer, in the case, whilst in the witness box under my cross
examination.
Caught ‘red handed’,
you may think, the trial was stopped but only after the judge had allowed
sufficient time to pass, by the CPS calling the next witness to use the excuse
that the evidence was most unsafe as no element of ‘dangerous driving’ had been
tendered.
An “It stinks” comment
from an irate prisoner in the dock, for the judge not having the police inspector and
the Barry senior officer, who had instructed him to be there, be immediately
jailed for perverting the course of justice, led, in turn, to my immediate
imprisonment for ‘contempt of court’.
Nicholas and ten other Cardiff Crown court judges were instrumental
to my long incarceration in both 2009 and 2010 as permanently unfit to stand
trial, a story for later, perhaps, once I am allowed by the Cardiff court cabal
to allow my enlightening of ‘interests of the general public’.
I had earlier served
a copy of this ‘jury note’ on this civil court explaining on how I had been so
lucky in getting it as Cardiff’s HM’s reputation, of releasing to me anything,
if at all, following any of my nonsense appearances,
is already a legend in our time with the latest bound for Europe.
I had only been able
to get such a copy by entering the cellars of the Cardiff Crown Court by first waiting
a few years, just as I recently did with acquiring vital witness statements in the
equally scandalous South Wales Police ‘machine gun’ case when Barbara Wilding with
MAPPA 2009 episode tried to stop this civil trial. Her police had been
instructed to paint the ‘machine gun’ a different colour in order to try and fool
yet another jury.
The Chief Constable’s QC, over the tape recording approval,
agreed the draft order in its entirety and therefore soon left the building
with a sealed copy of it in my ‘hot and clammy hand’!
13 04 18 Permission Order to Tape Record.pdf
SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf
But this morning, Friday 19th April 2013,
once I had just clarified my reasoning for my outstanding fifteen year desire
for a ‘level playing field’ and ‘equality in Arms’ over the cost of buying a three
month transcript, I was promptly stopped from doing any more recording.
As the QC had reminded me, earlier this week, English civil proceedings is based on adversarial
‘rules’ and ‘regulations’ with criminal procedures being but a modification on
those principles.
Overnight, however, following this latest threat on the tax
payer’s ‘gravy train’ continuing existence, had obviously sparked phone calls all
over the frightened lucrative legal industry but, as if coming from some ‘higher’
authority, the yesterday’s Court Order was apparently nullified.
Now ‘dead in the water’ this important Court Order had, oh
so conveniently, avoided the QC’s obviously alternative but embarrassing intention,
that of the Court of Appeal where it would have been quashed, of course but in
public.
I had opened today’s hearing by saying that the tape
recorder should be only turned on during ‘evidence in chief’, ‘cross
examination’ and ‘re examination’ of witnesses and for a tape not to be used
for any other purpose. Sound legal argument, over the years, had opposed the
right of a litigant in person tape recording at all for fear of picking up
private conversations from within the well of the court and or public gallery.
Avarice still dominates the main driving force in obstructing
any reform in both England and Wales’ judicial system.
The next bomb shell to fall on me is to be quietly told by the
QC, during an interval, that I had not even pleaded the malicious prosecution incident
when both police and Crown Prosecution Service had conspired to prosecute me
for a speeding offence when, as I had the prosecutor by the scruff of the neck
at the collapsed trial, a photo had fluttered from his red file with a clear
mug shot of my workman who had borrowed my van for the day!
Oh so interesting how each of my more ‘politically sensitive’
incidents, citing HM abuse of process, seem to get ‘struck out’.
Oh so interesting how my show of complete dismay was
answered by a chorus of voices, from within in the room recounting, despite on
how Inspector Anthony Rice, with a band of police officers tight on his heels,
had come bursting into Barry magistrate’s court room, had already given
evidence in these civil proceedings, denying all knowledge and would not be
recalled by the judge!
As the seventh week of a three month trial is coming to an
end I am now more confused and muddled up then ever over as to which police witnesses
are relevant and for which of the thirty five incidents they belong! These last two week’s had been particularly full
of surprises but nothing quite like yesterday!
I, for example, was
granted permission to tape record, on my own recorder, ‘witness evidence’
starting with one of the police officers in my, twelve years ago, collapsed
‘Dangerous Driving’ jury trial at Cardiff Crown Court.
A hand written ‘jury
note’ had been passed to the then judge, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, all
twelve complaining of a Barry police
inspector from the well of the court, no less, was repeatedly signalling to the
police officer, in the case, whilst in the witness box under my cross
examination.
Caught ‘red handed’,
you may think, the trial was stopped but only after the judge had allowed
sufficient time to pass, by the CPS calling the next witness to use the excuse
that the evidence was most unsafe as no element of ‘dangerous driving’ had been
tendered.
An “It stinks”
comment from an irate prisoner in the dock, for the judge not having the police inspector and
the Barry senior officer, who had instructed him to be there, be immediately
jailed for perverting the course of justice, led, in turn, to my immediate
imprisonment for ‘contempt of court’.
Nicholas and ten other Cardiff Crown court judges were
instrumental to my long incarceration in both 2009 and 2010 as permanently
unfit to stand trial, a story for later, perhaps, once I am allowed by the
Cardiff court cabal to allow my enlightening of ‘interests of the general public’.
I had earlier served
a copy of this ‘jury note’ on this civil court explaining on how I had been so
lucky in getting it as Cardiff’s HM’s reputation, of releasing to me anything,
if at all, following any of my nonsense appearances,
is already a legend in our time with the latest bound for Europe.
I had only been able
to get such a copy by entering the cellars of the Cardiff Crown Court by first
waiting a few years, just as I recently did with acquiring vital witness
statements in the equally scandalous South Wales Police ‘machine gun’ case when
Barbara Wilding with MAPPA 2009 episode tried to stop this civil trial. Her
police had been instructed to paint the ‘machine gun’ a different colour in
order to try and fool yet another jury.
The Chief Constable’s QC, over the tape recording approval,
agreed the draft order in its entirety and therefore soon left the building
with a sealed copy of it in my ‘hot and clammy hand’!
But this morning,
once I had just clarified my reasoning for my outstanding fifteen year desire
for a ‘level playing field’ and ‘equality in Arms’ over the cost of buying a
three month transcript, I was promptly stopped from doing any more recording.
As the QC had reminded me, earlier this week, English civil proceedings is based on adversarial
‘rules’ and ‘regulations’ with criminal procedures being but a modification on
those principles.
Overnight, however, following this latest threat on the tax
payer’s ‘gravy train’ continuing existence had obviously sparked phone calls
all over the frightened lucrative legal industry but, as if coming from some
‘higher’ authority, the yesterday’s Court Order was apparently nullified.
Now ‘dead in the water’ this important Court Order had, oh
so conveniently, avoided the QC’s obviously alternative but embarrassing
intention, that of the Court of Appeal where it would have been quashed, of
course but in public.
I had opened today’s hearing by saying that the tape
recorder should be only turned on during ‘evidence in chief’, ‘cross
examination’ and ‘re examination’ of witnesses and for a tape not to be used
for any other purpose. Sound legal argument, over the years, had opposed the
right of a litigant in person tape recording at all for fear of picking up
private conversations from within the well of the court and or public gallery.
Avarice still dominates the main driving force in
obstructing any reform in both England and Wales’ judicial system.
The next bomb shell to fall on me is to be quietly told by
the QC, during an interval, that I had not even pleaded the malicious
prosecution incident when both police and Crown Prosecution Service had
conspired to prosecute me for a speeding offence when, as I had the prosecutor
by the scruff of the neck at the collapsed trial, a photo had fluttered from
his red file with a clear mug shot of my workman who had borrowed my van for
the day!
Oh so interesting how each of my more ‘politically
sensitive’ incidents, citing HM abuse of process, seem to get ‘struck out’.
Oh so interesting how my show of complete dismay was
answered by a chorus of voices, from within in the room recounting, despite on
how Inspector Anthony Rice, with a
band of police officers tight on his heels, had come bursting into Barry
magistrate’s court room, had already given evidence in these civil proceedings,
denying all knowledge and would not be recalled by the judge!
Harassment from
Guernsey Police
This problem for the Claimant, with the Defendant’s QC now
stating, today, one or two more incidents are being ‘struck out’ of his Claim
is a last ditch desperate attempt to keep
the identity of undercover police officers under wraps. It appeared to
have arisen when a special constable, a Ms Martin, of Barry, a client to his veterinary
hospital, while being cross examined, last week, let it slip that the South
Wales Police were regularly communicating with Guernsey Police both ‘hell bent’
on causing him trouble.
This off duty client had noticed his Guernsey Honda Acty Van
often parked outside the veterinary hospital and had been in the country for
quite some time so she took it upon herself or so she said on oath, to
telephone Guernsey’s DVLC equivalent to establish the van’s legality in the UK.
Unbeknown to her, if
true, the senior officers in her nearby police station were already conducting a
busy two-way telephone traffic with Guernsey over a number of similarly registered Claimant’s vehicles, especially
over a high powered BMW motor cycle that had ‘lost’ them, on wet roads, in a
high speed chase from Cardiff to almost Bridgend.
Fuelled by the vengeance, as there can be no other
reasonable explanation, both police forces having both had lost so many court
cases, so far, all part of a tax payer funded harassment campaign.
The Claimant, few will know until now, had received local police
bullying almost as soon as he set foot on the island of Guernsey, in 1981,
following a similar telephone call that had been made from where the Claimant
had just come, Taunton, Somerset.
As the Claimant’s June 2009 sixty four page damages claim witness
statement indicates, signed while a well armed Welsh police helicopter hovered
overhead waiting for similarly armed colleagues to surround his family home, ‘looking’
for ‘WW1 antique machine guns’ it so turned out, explains what all this welsh
harassment originated.
It was clearly long overdue, the Claimant thought, to reveal
the reason behind Taunton police’s vengeance, to first hound him out of town
and then seek assistance from the Guernsey’s Authorities that would finally lead
to the unlawful stealing and selling off his veterinary practice on that disreputable
island.
A 1984 'Out of Court' Documentary relating to the 21 times the Claimant was put in prison by the Guernsey Police
http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM
Harassment from Avon and Somerset Police
Harassment had all stemmed
from a not un colourful incident over an antique 17th Century flint
lock rifle the Claimant had happened to be cleaning, while on the phone when
police burst in through his front door. They appeared to be far too enthusiastic
over the Claimant’s personal welfare when requiring that he to be ‘escorted’
back at the station for a little questioning.
The earlier purchase
of half gallon of lawn mower fuel, somewhere in the dark near Wellington during
an easterly gale flight from almost Cornwall, had appeared to have sparked off
a problem.
The Claimant and his
cub,, along with his Dad, was now flying only on petrol vapour left in the ten
gallon scuttle tank but still had to make the last six miles in order to land
on Taunton Race Course.
The content recorded in the borrowed personal note book of Taunton’s
then Chief Superintendant, ‘Curly Hawkins’, on the same date as the flying incident,
it usually then being kept in the officer’s wooden desk, second draw down on
the left, deep inside Avon and Somerset’s Taunton HQ, proved what the Claimant
had always believed all with a subsequent magistrates hearing over ‘guns’, that
the borrowing of that note book, recorded a ‘stitch up’ with the Claimant’s acquittal.
What then occurred, some six months later, in Bristol Crown court, charged with
theft of the police man’s note book, is far too amusing and long a story to
recount just now but it also resulted in an acquittal with no defence evidence
required which the Claimant has seriously now regretted ever since.
So back to ‘vengeance’ and never mind the cost, Barry police
were now burning the ‘mid night oil with 24/7 covert surveillance on the
Claimant when he was just trying to go about his work in the Vale of Glamorgan.
I may finish this blog tomorrow if I recover in time after another
predictably pleasant evening with Brittany friends up in the mountains behind
Port Talbot.
ps
And who, out there, is keeping up with this little missive of conspiratorial skulduggery?
10 05 26 NHS Deny Rcds Exist.pdf
Litigant in Person Protest and supervised tape recording outside Leeds High Court
The Observer and others have a Welsh equivalent D 'Notice' on this current South Wales Police Case
Doc2.docx