IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY
COURT BS 614159-MC65
CF101741 CF204141
BETWEEN:
MAURICE
JOHN KIRK
Claimant
and
THE
CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES POLICE
Defendant
CLAIMANTS POSITION
STATEMENT
Re Conduct of Dolmans, Solicitors, Cardiff
17th April 2013
Application
For the court to order the Defendant disclosure of:
1.
Police Sergeant
1846 Brown, custody officer, who, on 20th May1993 night, while
the Claimant was locked up in Fairwater
police station as ‘unidentified’. This officer recorded relevant information re
late visit by a senior Barry police officer that used the spy hole of the
Claimant’s cell door to further confirm DP identity.
2.
Fairwater Police
Station Sketch Plan of lay-out of cells/ interrogation rooms and or allow access,
this time with permission, for claimant to have access to parts of the building
identified in the Defendant’s evidence.
3.
Police officers ‘Trigg’.
There is a whole family of Triggs, so far undisclosed, featuring widely in this
case and who were based, between 1992 to 2002, at either Barry or Cardiff police
stations. One caused Barry police to visit the Claimant’s cell, before his
spell in HMP Cardiff, as still ‘un identified’.
4.
Captain Moseley
of South Wales Police Bell 206 helicopter, circa 2001, ‘in tail chase low
level’ across the Vale of Glamorgan on the rumour, only, that the pilot of a WW11 Piper Cub, registration
G-KIRK, had a suspended pilot’s licence, no insurance and tyre pressures not in
accordance with ‘normal aviation practice’.
5. Witnesses to ‘Dangerous Driving/Positive
Road Side Breath Test’ by Use of ‘High Alcohol Content’ Mouth Wash, alleged
by senior police officers, generally, requires urgent addressing by the court
before any further evidence can be given.
6.
Anthony Gafael of
Cardiff and known to the police, has evidence relating to extensive damage, by
sledge hammer, done to Claimant’s then 6th June 1995 veterinary
surgery at 175 Cowbridge Road West, that lead to the Claimant’s clandestine arrest
for the ‘eviction of tenants’.
7.
Hidden witness list, above, is far from exhaustive.
8.
Identification
of each exhibit in Claimant’s 51/52 leaver arch files, (Repeat Application), originally served on the Defendant
some 8/9 years ago, as prosecution
exhibits. The Claimant’s originals were photocopied by the Defendant but returned
with index references, on each spine, deliberately/accidentally obliterated thus
making the finding of essential prosecution exhibits, for any future defending
or prosecution witnesses, an unnecessary impediment.
9.
Trial Costs
Estimate A current estimate this court action has so far cost the tax payer
and or Claimant and in particular, identifying the net payment due to Dolmans,
solicitors of 1, Kings Way, Cardiff, for so called ‘services rendered’.
Maurice J Kirk BVSc