Pingback from  CREDIBILITY of Police ZERO in Public Administration Committee of House of Commons | Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

And here is the Oath of Attestation as published by whistleblower PC James Patrick:

mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/.../13-11-20-james-patrick-oath-of-attestation.pdf

PC James Patrick gave evidence before the Public Administration Committee in the House of Commons yesterday: victims-unite.net/.../cuffing-nodding-skewing-stitching-ways-of-falsifying-crime-statistics

Paul Flynn MP referred to a trustworthy constituent who pointed to freemasonry in the Police.

I understand that peers are currently looking into South Wales Police.

And the mainstream media are reporting for once! See the 'related articles' on mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/.../credibility-of-police-zero-in-public-administration-committee-of-house-of-commons

The judgment Judge Bidder on 17th October makes sad reading. It becomes clear that Maurice does indeed have a history of breaching bail conditions, hence why the Judge rules that after his latest breach – (Non appearance at Court) he is remanded. Maurice was silly to not go to Court that day.

The Judge also makes reference to Maurice having been convicted of assault previously. I did find a transcript of one of Maurice’s RCVS appeal hearings; it mentions numerous assault convictions;

[4] The first time Mr Kirk was arraigned before the Disciplinary was in 1984. On that occasion the College relied upon 17 convictions, including assault occasioning actual bodily harm (6 months imprisonment suspended), imperilling the safety of an aircraft while under the influence of drink (6 months imprisonment) and assaulting two police officers (3 months imprisonment). All the convictions were proved but the Committee found that only the assault causing actual bodily harm (throwing a tenant of his upstairs flat down the stairs) was such as to render him unfit to practise as a veterinary surgeon.

It also mentions a conviction of assault against Christopher Ebb’s it also mentions claims by Ebb’s that Maurice threatened to use a firearm against members of Ebbs family. Maurice was also convicted of that.

[13] The next assault case was in 1997, when Mr Kirk was convicted by the Bristol Magistrates of common assault and threatening behaviour (under s 4 of the Public Order Act 1936) arising out of an incident at the Plume and Feathers Public House in Bristol. The complainant was Mr Christopher Ebbs, who had done some work on an aircraft belonging to Mr Kirk. It appears that Mr Ebbs was exercising a lien on the aircraft’s logbooks and other documentation as security for a bill of about £22,000. They arranged to meet in the public house. Mr Ebbs said in evidence that this was with a view to exchanging the aircraft documentation for a cheque. He said that while they were having a drink, Mr Kirk swung a fist at him, knocked him to the ground, kicked him in the ribs and tried to extract the documents from his coat pocket. This was the basis of the charge of common assault. He was also alleged to have said “I’ve got a shotgun and I know where your parents live”. As a result of this threat, Mr Ebbs went to the police who moved his parents into a hotel and provided them with armed protection.

This threat was the basis of the charge of threatening behaviour. Mr Kirk’s evidence was that he asked for his papers and reached over expecting to receive them, but Mr Ebbs fell off his chair. As Mr Kirk tried to help him up, a drunken customer grabbed him. He denied kicking or punching Ebbs or making threats against his parents.

[14] The Bristol magistrates convicted on both charges and imposed fines of £600 for the assault and £500 for threatening behaviour, together with an order to pay Mr Ebbs £100 compensation. Mr Kirk appealed to the Bristol Crown Court but the appeal was dismissed. He also brought a number of applications for judicial review, alleging that the trial had been an abuse of process. One ground was that there had not been proper disclosure of relevant statements made to the police and another was that he had been unable to obtain the medical records of Mr Ebbs, which would show that he had psychiatric problems. A judge had made an order for disclosure of Mr Ebbs’s medical records by the prosecution if he was willing to allow them to be produced. But he was not willing. None of the applications for judicial review was successful.

I do feel that there is a conspiracy to “get” Kirk, but I also feel he has not helped himself – it’s almost as if he has played into their hands with some of his actions.

Having tried to look at all of that in a balanced way, I still feel that no person of Maurice’s age deserves to be sitting in prison.

Pingback from  Arrest of a violent offender! - 04 Latest News

12 sheets of messages were received this morning from Maurice - the bulk here:  

butlincat.wordpress.com/.../from-maurice-kirk-20-nov-2013

Relavent messages have been forwarded as requested by MK.

Also, regarding the allegation re: "burning down of a house" according to the doctors statement it originated from the S. Wales police - see the part of the dr's statement:

www.sendspace.com/.../4xz3ga

"Cat Lady" put simply, the authorities have been framing Maurice Kirk for 20+ years and imho these quotes you've cited are not worth the paper they are written on. They are meaningless. Even the judgements are meaningless because most are based on fiction and not true in any way. MK has been stopped 35 times in his car during the recent  years - not once was he charged with drink driving and most times he wasn't even given a breath test - that's how serious his being stopped in his car when driving whilst under the influence of alcohol was. Don't you think hed have been found guilty just once out of 35 stops if the stops were warranted? Anything written about MK  from official sources should be treated with extreme caution. Things are very different now, and about to get very much worse and its easy to be fooled by official looking documents or uniforms.   www.telegraph.co.uk/.../Nearly-1000-serving-police-officers-and-PCSOs-have-a-criminal-record.html

Let's get one thing clear here

'Not Once' - has any judge in all of Kirk's matters / cases referred to the issue of 'witnesses' giving contradictory evidence in court on oath.

There are multitudes of contradictions which are known of and evidenced in many paper trails both in and out of court.

As an example - and it couldn't be a better one - After KIrk was 'acquitted' in the MACHINE GUN Trial criminal case - The judge ought to have referred the evidence given by foxy to be investigated 'as an attempt to pervert the course of justice' - he didn't and has not since that time - any guesses as to why?

The judiciary - are guilty of acting in the vendetta and cross agency / trade body conspiracy to silence Kirk by their OWN SILENCE on that matter alone.

And then there's the REWARD FOR FAILURE MR TWOMLOW - made up (promoted) to within their own ranks ...

Their 'Silences' speak VOLUMES. As for their b/s about being independent politically - they are totally politicised and they are IMHO the biggest part of the problem.

Just a little note to add:

Many who read this blog - should be aware that there is an old saying of:

'Silence begets guilt' ... so who are the ones who have by their very own nature remained silent as to accusations?

Dear Cat Lady

Let's not forget:

1. the worst of all crimes that SWP committed is to get Maurice struck off his professional register

2. the next 'best' was seven months in Caswell Clinic

Now he got kicked by PO MEIRS in his already damaged ankle such that he can't walk. Can you possibly think of helping him constructively besides offering 'tea and sympathy'?

Since he's soo cut off, emails via www.emailaprisoner.com are a start. You just need to pay £5 at the beginning and use his prisoner no A7306AT.

Dear Sabine,

I do not know Maurice - so why would he want emails from a stranger, you and others seem to be helping him in practical ways.

Perhaps the best help I can give is what I have been doing, and that is asking the questions to the seemingly unanswered points that frequent this blog which are perhaps missed by busy people such as yourself and because you know the answers you falsely assume that others share your knowledge.

I am sorry if that is simplistic, but the vast majority of people who I have chatted to and have taken the time to read the blog have a similar view.

On the subject of tea and sympathy, you are obviously trusted by Maurice and with personal contact with him, but in one of your posts you said: "I don't like acting as a typist. But what can you do when prisoners don't get legal representation or their lawyers are prevented from visiting them?"

Why complain? he trusted you yet you commented you don't like being a typist. Maurice obviously has no internet access so he needs people like you to publicise his case.

On a more practical point I wrote to Maurice last week (His prison address and number appears numerous times on this blog), enclosing some first class stamps and a ten pound postal order to help him. Surely that is more helpful than a meaningless email from a stranger?

I copy below Maurices address and the prison service guidance should anyone else be in a similar position to myself with respect to wanting to help Maurice in a practical way,

Maurice J Kirk A7306AT

HMP Prison Cardiff

1 Knox Road

Cardiff CF24 0UJ

...........................................

Letters

When you write to a prisoner you must include your full name and address. In most prisons the letters are searched and can be read before being given to the prisoner.

You can write about anything but letters must not be obscene, name ‘victims’, or be a threat to discipline or security. Do not enclose any items with letters. Make sure you put sufficient postage to cover the costs (anything bigger than A5 counts as ‘large’). Prisoners can normally receive a ‘reasonable’ number of letters per week.

If you send greetings cards these should be of reasonable size and not padded or pouched. Do not send musical cards. If you are sending more than one card put them all inside one outer envelope, this saves postage. Remember to include your full details (you could put your details on a ‘Post-It’ note stuck to the card or include a letter which has your details).

Always put the prisoner’s full name and prison number. If the person has been moved their mail will be forwarded.

On conviction or transfer a prisoner should be given a ‘Reception’ letter to write to tell you where they are.

Prisoners are given a free letter each week to post out, they can send more, but at their own expense. Some prisons allow you to send in stamps.

You can send stamped address envelopes (address to yourself), for the prisoner to reply, to any prisoner in any prison.

Prisoners are not allowed to send you letters or information to be posted on social networking internet sites.

Remember all letters are opened and checked and may be read.

Full information about prisoners’ correspondence can be found in Prison Service Instruction 2011-006

Photographs

You can usually send in photographs but in some prisons these must not include any image of the prisoner. Child protection measures may mean that some prisoners may not receive pictures of children, unless they are their own and were not ‘victims’. If you send pictures of children include an explanatory note identifying who the children are and their relationship to the prisoner.

Money

It is not a good idea to send cash, this can get ‘lost’ in the prison. Prisons prefer Postal Orders, but you could send a cheque. Make these payable to ‘H M Prison Service’, write your name on the back and also the prisoner’s full name and prison number. Any money sent which is deemed to be ‘anonymous’ can be stopped.

Money you send is paid into the prisoner’s ‘Private Cash’ account and they get access to a certain amount (depending upon IEP) each week [currently £15.50 for Standard prisoners]. Include your full detail in an accompanying letter or note. It takes about a week for the money to be credited to the prisoner.

Further envelopes containing documents came today and are here:

butlincat.wordpress.com/.../from-maurice-kirk-21-nov-13

And Cat Lady, theres no absolute proof MK is receiving all his emails sent to him, so treat with discernment the blanket statement to send emails with an auumption MK will receive them. I have reason to believe MK does not receive all of his emails because I have asked numerous important questions which have received no answer, and judging my MKs messages to me they also point to him not receiving emails sent. Sabine Mcneil imakes statements online that have no truth to them - I refer of course to her statement on her numerous "sites" claiming wrongly an upcoming Musa appeal hearing is being held on the 6th December - it is most definitely not the Musa's "appeal" hearing on the 6th, but an application for whether an appeal can take place at all. Judging by this gaffe, and knowing her close friendship with the Musas defence team [the clandestine lunches held after the Musas trial that no one knew about - not even the Musas until somebody who knew about them felt we needed to be told] and a certain MP, it is very worrying whether these two subjects  have been fed false information in the past by her and acted upon the duff info to the Musas detriment and demise.

Good points Butlincat. It's exactly the reason that I preferred to send practical help to Maurice via Royal Mail.

I have been told by others that Sabine will often make factually inaccurate claims that are biased to her opinion rather than hard fact. I have seen some of the "forensic analysis" that she has published and wonder if a teenager could do a better job of accurate analysis of a situation - with less political spin.

Sorry to be so blunt (to Sabine) but should the focus on this Blog be Maurice, rather than trying to draw parallels with other situations often causing distraction from Maurice's plight.

I believe you are spot on Cat Lady - and whats more if you have the "gift of the gab" acquired, say, by Neural Linguistic Programming courses its not hard to persuade people, eg unwitting legal representatives, that what you are saying is not only factual and correct, but also "right",. when of course its nothing of the sort. Belonging to convincing sounding orgaisations helps, and being seen as a friend of MPs helps a massive amount also. Finally, "blackjacket" any opposition or critic, surround yourself with protecting barking dogs and one is made!! The ancient art of confidence trickery, its called, and is but part of this problem which is now coming to light - and not before time too!!.

More documents were received today from MK - they are here:

butlincat.wordpress.com/.../update-maurice-kirk-23-nov-2013

As can be seen from the many previous messages sent MK asks that at least certain documents go viral - which means on this - his - site. My site cannot be considered "viral" and even though I post everything hes ever sent there it is meaningless as it does not get the viewing figures so as to be called "viral". The sheet at the very top of this page was received on the 20th November and everything received was sent to supporters.

Anyway, that's what MK asks but whether it gets done or not is another matter, it seems, which is a great shame as the people MK wants to see his letters are not seeing them at all!!!..

THANK YOU on Maurice's behalf, Cat Lady!

Thank you Sabine, I am certain that the day will come where Maurice will be able to express his thanks to ANYONE who has helped him.

Perhaps someone else will offer you thanks as well on behalf of Maurice, or perhaps they won't simply as most prefer to avoid sanctimonious aspirations.

I am sorry, but there are also a number of other posters on here who deserve thanks leaving me to only think your comment can only be sanctimonious.

I have read that English is perhaps not your first language, therefore for the avoidance of any doubt, the definition of sanctimonious -

adjective derogatory

making a show of being morally superior to other people.

"what happened to all the sanctimonious talk about putting his family first?"

synonyms: self-righteous, holier-than-thou, churchy, pious, pietistic, moralizing, unctuous, smug, superior, priggish, mealy-mouthed, hypocritical, insincere, for form's sake, to keep up appearances; informal goody-goody, pi;

A little reminder of an article posted up here some time ago - you only need to read the last four paragraphs - yet again. It is suggested that those with a short memory span print it off and do not forget it - especially the pigs, the CPS, the wigs and the dirty politicians 'all of them with so many hidden agendas - Contrary to what is "The Public Interest":-  

It is the content of it - which published into the public domain - let a few cats out of the bag:-

Article by Daniel Finkelstein - The Times 2008.

"Below is the last four paragraphs.

Now look at the Central Park Jogger case. People suffered because mistakes were made. The police and the prosecution, believing themselves to be good people doing good work, could not reconcile this suffering with their view of themselves. So they insisted, they had to insist, that the teenagers were guilty. The facts challenged their theory of themselves, so the facts had to be reinterpreted. The Evans case is similar. The legal Establishment regarded itself as dispensing justice and the death of an innocent man didn’t fit. It became essential that he not be innocent, whatever the evidence.

When groups – police, medics, politicians, social workers, the Family Court apparatus – get together, convinced of their own righteousness, the facts (like Timothy Evans) can go hang. They are certain that they are right, certain that they are just and often, you know, they really are. But when they are not, they will never ever admit it, digging themselves in more and more deeply.

A local authority that has taken your children away can never admit it did so wrongly. And every fact that shows that it did needs to be twisted around until it shows that it didn’t. That is what is happening all the time, behind the closed doors of our Family Courts beyond scrutiny.

There’s only one way out. That is to allow others, those without a stake in the righteousness of anyone, to shine a light on proceedings. Not to do so is inexcusable. It is an affront to justice and the rule of law."

There is no doubt that cognitive dissonance is a malaise that is contaminating many of the country's officials and apparatchiks. As Whistleblower quoted above, the only cure is to shine a light on them but that will only work if enough good people are watching whilst the light is being shone.

That is why they want secret courts and why they make it difficult for witnesses to attend in "open court". Why are there no transcripts available in magistrates courts, why are we not allowed to film or record them?

It is inconcievable in this age of digital communication when GCHQ records the phone calls of millions of innocent people every day ( they don't like the light being shone either, witness what they are trying to do to Edward Snowdon ), that we can have people sent to prison by district judges in (what were formally) magistrates courts and there is no record of proceedings!

Cat Lady, whilst I do appreciate you taking the time and trouble to research Maurices history more thoroughly, it is always prudent to remeber that there are two sides to every story. Your quoted material from Maurice's appeal to the Privvy council ( in itself a Masonic old boys club) highlights the assault and testimony of a certain Mr Ebbs.

Here is another side to Mr Ebbs, from the Gazette

Choirmaster admits sexually assaulting boy

9:49am Friday 4th January 2008 in News By Court Reporter

A CHOIRMASTER who got a sexual thrill from spanking an 11-year-old boy chorister has been banned from working with children for the rest of his life.

Christopher Ebbs, 37, put the boy over his knee and spanked him with a slipper, Gloucester Crown Court heard.

Aeronautical engineer Ebbs filmed the spanking on DVD - and when his marriage later broke up his wife handed the video evidence to police.

Ebbs, of Main Road, Woodford, Berkeley, pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting the boy between October 31, 2006 and July 12, 2007.

After hearing that Ebbs had already spent three and a half months in custody after his arrest - and that he had been beaten up by two men in a revenge attack on Christmas Day - Judge Jamie Tabor QC allowed him to walk free from court.

The judge, who had watched the DVD of the incident in private, sentenced Ebbs to three years' supervision with a condition that he undergoes a sex offenders' treatment programme.

Ebbs, who sat clutching a Bible in the dock throughout the hearing, was also ordered to sign the sex offenders' register for five years - and he was banned from working with children in any capacity for the rest of his life.

"That means no more choirs with children in them," the judge told Ebbs.

The court heard that Ebbs, who has a music degree from the Royal School of Music, ran one of England's largest junior choirs.

Ebbs had converted a room at his home for choir instruction and children would go there for tuition and to try on chorister outfits, said prosecutor Robert Davies.

He said the boy whom Ebbs spanked had been a member of the choir.

"On one occasion there appears to have been a reasonably straightforward music lesson, which you have seen on the film," Mr Davies told the judge.

"At some stage in that, however, there was mention by Mr Ebbs that the boy needed a good slapping when he had done something marginally wrong."

Judge Tabor said he noticed in the film that the boy had found a pair of handuffs and produced them to which Ebbs asked 'Do you want handcuffs?' Mr Davies went on "Your Honour sees that then, essentially, the boy is over Mr Ebbs' knee, his cassock is pulled up and he is being hit on the bottom with a slipper for 20 to 30 seconds."

The judge said "This was not a thrashing as I remember from school. It was more a playful slapping. Certainly, the little boy was not hurting - he appeared to be laughing."

Mr Davies agreed "It doesn't look like the boy is being punished for anything. It seems to have been done for other reasons. At one point Mr Ebbs says 'You are supposed to say Ow or something.

"Mr Ebbs accepts that his behaviour became sexual."

The offence came to light, said the prosecutor, when Ebbs had 'serious matrimonial problems' and separated from his wife - who then provided police with the video.

When Ebbs' computer hard drive was checked by police experts evidence was found of his interest in 'violent bondage as part of his adult sex life,' said Mr Davies.

The computer showed he had made internet searches for websites involved with bondage, chains, and caning, he said.

Ignatius Hughes, mitigating, said Ebbs' choirs had starred in cathedral concerts and on BBC TV.

"He ran a well known, well respected and highly competent choir," Mr Hughes said. "He holds a degree in music from the Royal School of Music.

"There have been witnesses who have made statements suggesting that the whole thing was a charade and a Mickey Mouse choir but nothing could be further from the truth and the Crown accepts that.

"You are dealing with a man who has worked with choirs for 15 years and not just children's choirs. He has worked also with adults."

Mr Hughes said Ebbs was a man of previous good character who had now lost his job in an aeronautical career and was unlikely ever to have such work again because he would not get Ministry of Defence security clearance following his conviction.

He would also be stopped from carrying on his choir work, having provided 'an extremely admirable activity for children, very often underprivileged children,' the barrister added.

"He has taught them how to achieve and has succeeded in giving a sense of worth to a great many people," said Mr Hughes.

"This man has given an awful lot to his community."

The offence happened at a time when Ebbs was stressed by his long working hours both with the choir and his job, he said.

"He accepts of course that he has certain predilections and doesn't for a moment go behind that."

Mr Hughes said that during the lesson with the boy Ebbs accepted that his 'motivation became sexual.' But the spanking was with clothes on and there was no direct contact with sexual organs, he said.

The boy himself had not even remembered the incident when he was asked about it by police, he added.

Ebbs was genuinely ashamed of what he had done and had already paid a high price by serving the equivalent of a seven month jail term when he was remanded in custody, said Mr Hughes.

"On Christmas Day he was assaulted badly outside his own home, dragged into a nearby outbuilding and kicked very badly by two men. He has two broken ribs, dislocated hip, bruises all over his body.

"He was taken to Frenchay Hospital because of worries about a head injury. He had a very large lump to the back of his head.

"Something was said during the assault which made it plain the men had an interest in this case.

"The assault has not been reported to the police. He does not seek criminal or any retribution at all."

Passing sentence, the judge told Ebbs that he ignored other charges against him of voyeurism and sexual assault on a girl in the USA because he had denied them and they had not been proceeded with by the Crown.

"You are to be sentenced simply for spanking a 10-year-old inappropriately and obtaining sexual gratification from it," said the judge.

Judge Tabor said he abided by Ebbs' own basis of plea, accepted by the prosecution.

The basis of plea said Ebbs had run a well respected and highly competent choir, held a degree from the RSM and had organised choirs for 15 years.

"At the time of the offence you had been working many hours, your marriage was breaking up and you were under stress.

"You do have an interest in mild bondage in your adult sexual life. On this occasion, while chastisting this particular child, the touching became sexual. But your motivation in running the choir was entirely bona fide."

The judge told Ebbs "You were giving this young man a music test, both vocal and sight reading. That is what took up most of the time in the film I watched.

"At the end of that this young man lay across your knees and you spanked him mildly with a slipper. It certainly was not a spanking which hurt him.

"He was giggling throughout it as far as I could tell. But you undoubtedly, as you accept, obtained a degree of sexual gratification from it."

The seriousness of the offence, said the judge, was that the boy was very young and that it was in breach of trust.

"Parents throughout Gloucestershire had entrusted both male and female children into your hands to be taught to sing and to appreciate music and it is a betrayal of them as well as that young man which is the seriousness of this offence," Judge Tabor said.

"They will undoubtedly feel 'I wonder what he did to our little boy or little girl' as well. It was a considerable breach of trust and one which cannot be ignored."

The judge said he would not pass a prison term, however, because Ebbs' time in custody on remand was already longer than the guideline sentence for the offence.

The most effective thing, he said, was to make orders which would prevent Ebbs coming into contact with children again as well as making him address his offending.

After the hearing, however, the boy's father said: "I would have liked to see him jailed for longer for what he did. The sentence should have been harsher.

"It's not true that my son was unaffected by this. He is now emotionally charged. Before this happened he was a very quiet and subdued young man with a very caring nature but this has made him erratic in his behaviour.

"He won't talk to us about what happened. I am seeking counselling for him and for another of my children who has also been affected by this."

Sabine Mcneil - you really cannot "thank me" and speak for Maurice Kirk. If he has any thanks to give anybody he does it himself to the person direstly. You are not the "go-between" for Maurice and myself, nor for anybody else and  although you probably think you are you most definitely are not.

Corrected error to my last statement:

"butlincat said:

Sabine Mcneil - you really cannot "thank" any other commenters here and speak for Maurice Kirk. If he has any thanks to give anybody he will do itt himself to the person direclly in time. You are not the "go-between" for Maurice or anybody else and  although you probably think you are you most definitely are not.

Recerived today from MJK: whichis self explanatory if one can  read it.

butlincat.wordpress.com/.../from-maurice-kirk-tues-26-nov-13

Letters are still being translated and forwarded by different parties to various as ordered by MJK...

Any news of todays proceedings - "for mention" before HHJ Rees at Cardiff - re Doctors report?

This morning Weds 27 Nov. 13 I received these disturbing letters from Maurice Kirk.

They are here: butlincat.wordpress.com/.../shocking-letters-received-from-maurice-kirk-weds-27-nov-13

It seems the police are still ignoring his approaches to them after being assaulted by the warder already named, and also appropriate medication is being denied M Kirk, who is unable to leave his cell we are told, due to injuries received. It is truly disgraceful what these public servants are getting away with and it is up to his friends and supporters to help him out. I do not need to tell anybody what happened to Arnold "Andy" McCardle: www.paulviking.websitetoolbox.com/post

Text of the below official prison complaint form:

1] 8 days of complaining in all known other ways have proved futile

2] At 01.15 hrs. I told prison officer JENKINS through a crack in my door I wanted the police snd medical attention because:

1] I had been assaulted by an officer

2] my house had been burgled

3] my car had reason to believe had been burgled

4] I had exhausted all known procedur es all week – reply: “contact your brief”

3] Refused any medication – ignored

1] since being assaulted 8 days ago appropriate conduits of complaint for a Litigant in Peerson have been refused with not even Healthcare attention, this being my 17th application since 16 October 2012 for police intervention when started by apparent theft of my car keys, passport and subsequent

legal papers

2] my blocked Recorded Delivery post I believe is also unlawful

3] Request copies of all Comp. 1 and Comp. 2 forms I have delivered this year.

Thank you.

[What would you like done about your complaint?]:

Confirm in writing, IAN CROSS HM GOVERNOR of this British prison, was correctly informed and when.

signed

M.J. Kirk 24 Nov. 2013

I urge anybody who really does care about what is happening to Maurice whilst at Cardiff prison to please notify as many authority figures as they can - from the prison governor =

Mr. I. Cross, Governor, HMP Cardiff, Knox Rd., Cardiff CF24 0UG

to the police and judiciary. These characters are not paid to act outside the law as they are, and obviously if none of them will take MK seriously then it is up to us to make them - after all, it us us who is paying their salaries year in, year out.. MK's MP, as resident of HMP Cardiff and as being of No Fixed Abode is Jenny Willott, MP, 38 The Parade Roath Cardiff CF24 3AD. Judges at  Cardiff Crown Court,  Law Courts, Cathays Park, Cardiff, South Glamorgan CF10 3PG and the police addresses can be got here:  www.south-wales.police.uk/.../vale-of-glamorgan

Thanks Guido - reading through Maurice's own posts with respect to Christoper Paul Ebbs (now seemingly known as Christopher Paul Alexander) is incredible:

To quote a few snippets:

kirkflyingvet.com/.../default.aspx

"1997. Evidence from Christopher Paul Ebbs, alone, a compulsive liar with extended mental health and criminal history."

(kirkflyingvet.com/.../christopher-paul-ebbs-alias-christopher-alexander-aircraft-engineer-oxford-crown-court-wednesday-15th-august-11-30am-court-4-be-there.aspx)

"THREATS TO KILL" & CHRISTOPHER PAUL EBBS ALIAS CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER AIRCRAFT ENGINEER OXFORD CROWN COURT WEDNESDAY 15TH AUGUST  

This individual with the South Wales Police gave evidence, on oath, before the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons.

My name was then removed from the veterinary register, effectively, for life."

(kirkflyingvet.com/.../quot-we-will-get-the-b-d-quot.aspx)

"The court heard Rice deny knowing Christopher Paul Ebbs (Alexander), standing in the back of the court, despite witness statements of South Wales Police crossing the bridge to England to induce Mr Ebbs ( alas Alexander) to alter his evidence for my forthcoming criminal court hearing."

One can only wonder about the credibility of a witness now for Maurice (Chris Ebbs / Alexander) who Maurice previously describes as a compulsive liar with mental health issues. A witness who was clearly influential in damaging Maurice's life.

Indeed Cat Lady, the credibility of Ebbs is now shot, so even if he tells the truth about how he was encouraged to lie by the bent cops to incriminate Maurice no one will believe him because he has already lied!

This is why the actions of those who conspire to pevert the course of justice are so corrosive to society and why it carries a harsh sentence. Those in public positions of power who indulge in this most heinous of crimes are guilty of treason and should be hanged as the Law still provides for.

Guido - sadly those are the same thoughts as my own. Ebbs is anything but a credible witness for Maurice. MJK's own statements in the past have served to help remove Ebbs credibility.

If Ebbs is telling the truth (now) about the incident then its very sad that Maurice has perhaps himself served to undermine that.

As the incident referred to was charges against Maurice in relation to Maurice assaulting Ebbs at the time I find it strange that Ebbs has now come forward to support Maurice. Was this due to guilt on Ebbs part with him perhaps having lied to get Maurice convicted before?  

Why has Sabine sneaked in a comment [the 14th one] on the last blog - some 20 or so minutes ago?

Such deviousness Sabine does not go unnoticed.

Butlincat - If I was Maurice I would have Sabine surgically attached to me - based on the old saying:

"keep your friends close but your enemies closer"

Sun-tzu (~400 BC) who was a Chinese general & military strategist.

By keeping your enemies closer you will know all their characteristics, likes, don't likes, weaknesses and strengths. Thus enabling you to over come them in time of battle by anticipating their every move and being one jump ahead at all times.

Documents were received from M Kirk yesterday and are here:

butlincat.wordpress.com/.../from-maurice-kirk-30-nov-2013

As you can see from the received MK asks who "Cat Lady" is - I emailed him to say I do not know.

What is your real name "Cat Lady"? - my name is John Graham [as shown many places online]. If you indeed have written to MK as shown earlier [in your comment of Nov. 21] presumably you signed it with your real name?

So world events move on apace, with protesters in Thailand on the rampage, having had their protests ignored by corrupt politicians they have had enough and have now decided to oust the criminals, who are now cowering behind the police that the protesters paid for!

The universe has a way of righting imbalances.

Perhaps those closer to home should pay attention to the manner of the uprising.

Talking about "closer to home" here is some more evidence of the South Wales Cabal Lodge protecting the satanist scum.

www.itv.com/.../complaint-claims-police-knew-of-ian-watkins-abuse-from-december-2008

This from the people who have  assisted in the removal of innocent children from loving parents at the drop of an SS officer's pen.

"There wasn't enough evidence for the Magistrates to grant a warrant" , evidence like a signed witness statement from a first hand witness!

Strangely enough they don't seem to need that much evidence to arrest Maurice!

Butlincat (John)

I read Maurice’s comment on the note he sent to you. I do not feel the need to make public my identity on here. That is in much the same way as others choose not to, for example Guido and Whistleblower2. That is our choice.

I am certain that many others are extremely cautious of doing anything other than quietly supporting Maurice in the background, rather than the glare of the authorities headlights. I hope he can respect that.

Whilst I feel compassion for Maurice and do believe that there is a conspiracy in part against him I can reassure you that I have not met Maurice and my only insight into him has been his blog. Which sadly seems to have been kidnapped by a certain individual to pursue their other “fights” rather than focusing on Maurice’s plight.

As I stated previously I have written to Maurice, but have not identified myself as “Cat Lady” in that letter simply as it is apparent that all of his post is opened and read.

If Maurice feels my posts have had no meaningful contribution to the debate and have failed to bring any balance to the publicity surrounding his plight then perhaps Maurice could notify you in his next letter and you can then publish that and I will quietly withdraw my support for him.

I am most defiantly not a plant or hostile in anyway shape or form to Maurice – simply a person who feels that at face value Maurice deserves better than to be in prison.

I received a 90 second call at 17.25 GMT tonight from I know not who which said:

1] MK was taken somewhere by wheelchair recently but is now back in HMP Cardiff

2] HMP and Police refused to take photos of his injuries. received whilst in HMP Cardiff

3] Police came but refused to take any statement off of MK re: his injuries or anything else

4] His medical records are being "fixed".

I for one will be telling the "Chief Constable" for the area and many more inc. Willott MP about the above. They think they can act as they like but they most definitely cant and the sooner these neer-do-well bullying criminals posing as authority figures are off the public payroll the cleaner and better the place will be! We can but dream.

Cat Lady - I think MK just wondered who you were that was all and im sure he is grateful of all the support he can get. and he will read your comment as I and maybe others send him whats happening on his site. It is a free country - just - and you are free to do as you like legally.