Maurice Kirk

Legal Battles

Reports on his current court case that started September 7, 2010 and previous stories. Please sign our online petition asking for Fair Trials and Compensation instead of an effective remedy before national authorities - in defence of Maurice and many other victims of financial exploitation and legal oppression. Here's the newsletter that invited people to sign. And here are the first wonderful comments by signatories.

Breaking News:

October 2011: Maurice on hunger strike in HMP Cardiff. See http://bit.ly/qnyRUt Political asylum granted by France - to a British citizen - for the first time since the French Revolution... For first time visitors, a one-page summary is on a complementary and introductory blog. Also, Maurice on a 12-minute video in Jersey.
  • South Wales Police Three Month Trial Closing Speeches on 23th July 2013

     

     Extract from Claimants Closing Submissions

    On 29th May 2002 the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, upon receipt of 7th January 2001 written complaint from the South Wales Police, removed the Claimants name from the veterinary register, for life, because the Claimant had been found guilty of having disrespect for authority

     

     

    This three month trial produced NEW EVIDENCE re below extract from RCVS 2002 London enquiry when the convictions was used to have me struck off

    This trial confirmed I delivered valid motoring insurance proof to Ely police station most likely under the control, at the time, of either Chief Inspector Brian Genner (the daughter of whom had a miscarriage blamed on me) or Inspector Robert Nelson Roe who used a sledgehammer and crow bar, helped by a van load of officers, to smash their way into my Cardiff veterinary surgery  to put Alison Genner back into my overhead flat with the drug dealer boy friend, Anthony Glen Gafael.

     

     

     

    D-Day

    Both these incidents produced statements on the same day by Inspector Roe from Gafael and guess who produced O' Brian's

    What these two incidents have in common is that Dolman's drafted 25th Feb 2009 Barbara Wilding Affidavit with her denying any knowledge of the break in and miscarriage Ely incident or the Llantwit Street incident with O'Brian saying he issued a HORT1 + demand to see Registration docs for the Guernsey ambulance.

     The reader following previous blogs may now guess why the defending QC denied seeing the O'Brian incident pleaded in the Action by the Claimant and the court refused me the right to call any of the conspiracy identified by Special Constable Deryn Wilson blurting out she had telephoned Guernsey police pretending she had lawfuly issued a HORT1 (for O'Brian) as by the time the trial came for 'not producing valid insurance'  for O'Brian circumstances changed, with 'trouble at mill'!

    A 'can of worms'  and the ususal I have suffered these 20 years fighting it in Wales

    13 05 22 A G Gafael Court Order.pdf 

     

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/royal_college_of_veterinary_surgeons/Disciplinary-Committee--Trial-2002.aspx

     

    Conclusions

    1. Despite considerable data having been passed between both the Defendant and Guernseys authorities, for a period exceeding thirty years, there was been no successful prosecution by either judiciary despite the unusual need for the Claimant to operate his respective veterinary practices on foreign motor vehicles or registered under fanciful names.  

    2. Despite the Claimant having been ordered by the Defendant to produce evidence of valid motoring insurance, no less than thirty five times between the dates of 1992 and 2002, there has been no successful prosecution despite countless Defendants direct communications with the Claimants insurance companies.

    3. Despite the Defendants successful complaint to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons the Claimant has since received no notices of intended prosecution for failing, no less than eight times, in producing his driving documents when stopped by a uniformed police officer.  

     schedu;le motoring_0001.pdf

     Schedule with names of registered keepers

     SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

     

     13 07 14 Claimant Position Statement.pdf

     

     

     AT THE END OF THE DAY THE RULE of LAW IS PARAMOUNT

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=psZBaJU_Cvo

    BLAIR WAS THE MAJOR MOST SINGLE CAUSE OF THIS  ABUSE  NOW HAPPENING IN A STREET NEAR YOU

    So what do intend doing about it?

  • Guernsey Unfinished Business Required a Discreet Flying Visit via Alderney Air Show & France

    WHAT ACTUALLY TRIGGERED 20 YEARS OF SOUTH WALES POLICE BULLYING

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/hm_tax_haven__channel_islands/archive/2010/09/25/official-transcript-10-december-1988.aspx

     

    NICK'S NAT WEST  BANK AND OWN LAWYERS, OZANNE VAN LEUVEN and PERROT, not forgetting PETER FERBRACHE , the ring leader, SWINDLED THEIR OWN CLIENTS, Partners in a veterinary practice.

     NICK WAS IN CATEL CLINIC, GUERNSEY'S SOUTH WALES' CASWELL CLINIC EQUIVALENT WITH HIS PARTNER THUMPING THE TABLE  HIM  SENT TO A PROPER ESTABLISHMENT, AWAY FROM HIS EX WIFE  PROPER HELP  IN THE UK

     Meanwhile the unsavoury bunch of gentlemen, after tearing up the veterinary partnership agreement, throw every thing they can at Nick's partner, bar the kitchen sink left  on that miserable piece of rock while he is trying, lawfully, to recover their joint property. 

    When over twenty illegal incarcerations, so often meaning locked up for a few days and then released without charge, to break his single handed business and a string of fabricated criminal charges the incestuous bunch resort to playing the Stalin 'gulag card'

    Deja Vu?

    I awaited the South Wales Police 'machine gun ' equivalent' and it came in the shape of ACK Day (HM Comptroller), Nick Blackwell's past swindling advocate, falsifying, while the jury waited, the charge sheet

    No one seemed to care but I had been originally charged the maximum fine of £200 as no statutory prison term existed in the law books

    Deja Vu?.

    Months later, while kept in prison, as the partnership swindle was now publicly blown from the top of a crane it was decided to change my charge to a substantial one, changing it to 'contempt of court'.

    But someone had forgotten to cook all the paperwork records  when all I had done was simply standing up in court and speaking what they did not anticipate.

    Deja vu?

    I had demanded 'Best evidence' Achbold 39th Edition , in those days, page 1001, sight of the original charge book

    Day had oozed himself out of the Royal Court, in the special adjournment, to the nearby police station and to his horror had found the charge was only a possible fine!

    Deja Vu?

    So Day and de Vic Cary, set about sticking over a new charge that could carry a long prison sentance- Deja Vu?

    Incidentally, the latter's grandfather as Bailiff, had identified the young Jewish girls to the N*z*s, in 1942 and had them sent to a concentration camp to be exterminated

    Deja vu?.   

    ACK Day then took a photocopy of the charge sheet after a card with typed new was stuck over the , rather like I had done  in Taunton, of a Chief Superintendent Hawkins  borrowed personal note book and had produced it in court to cause the quashing of serios fire arms charges

    Deja Vu? (not a Lewis Machine gun , that time but an 18th Century flintlock type 'Brown Bess' rifle currently stolen by the South Wales Police 

     [ The South Wales Police did something similar in order to  try and fool my Cardiff jury by painting over this silver painted Lewis, originally  bought from me, a year earlier,  as painted 'all black'.

     Not just this guy as the new owner, the police used as a prosecution witness but also the arms dealer who sold it, anything to try and get the mandatory 10 prison sentence to stop this three month trial nearly over.

    The Lincolnshire air museum were told to keep quiet about the new 'paint job', carried out by South Wales Police or he could go to prison instead!] 

     

    In those days, in Guernsey too many lawyers and bankers were involved in day to day fraud or 'white collar crime' and as it is now, immune to prosecution.

    I knew none of this culture, of course, it was a British island for Peter's sake!

    And I had caught the little b*st*rds 'red hande, red handed for fraud and in the subsequent  theft of both Nicholas  Blackwell and my veterinary business they attempted a cover up

    Deja Vu? (their MAPPA level 3 card was played

    Joseph would have been so proud of them and their cousins in Bridgend HQ.

    Someone had forgotten the existence opf the island's ubique prohibitive injunction

    81 Fraudulent Collusion between NatWest Bank.docx

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/guernsey/picture533.aspx

     

    THIS IS WHY MAURICE NEEDED A HIP REPLACEMENT AND WHY IT COULD ONLY GET DONE OUTSIDE THE UK

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPQxO5WW7s4

    09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

      (Maurice was arrested on his return to UK)

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/guernsey/Wicked-Guernsey-Medical-Procedures.aspx 

     

     MASONIC RING LEADERS STILL CONTROL GUERNSEY BUT LESS IN THE POLICE FORCE I WAS TOLD

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/hm_tax_haven__channel_islands/archive/2010/09/25/guernsey-freemansory-doyle-s-lodge-of-fellowship-no-84.aspx

     

    MAPPA ring leaders are getting away with it 

    Dressed appropriately for a HM Guernsey Law Court

     

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/maurices_picks/Guernsey-Prison.aspx

     

    Who  else was so bloody stupid?

     

     

    Forced to all live of a boat, for two years, having been refused the right to buy and live in a Guernsey house

     http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/guernsey/Guernsey-Squat-for-Maurice_2C00_-his-wife_2C00_-Janet-and-young-kids_2C00_-Caspar-and-Belinda.aspx

     

     Maurice found, this week, his harbour crane had gone!

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/guernsey/Fair-Trial-refused-in-Guernsey.aspx

     

    Guernsey Legal aid Association really gets up their noses

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/guernsey/Missed-By-32-Votes.aspx

     

    I left Guernsey via a boot of a car after threat to have him drowned

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/guernsey/Guernsey-Madness.aspx

     

     South Wales Police files hidden in Brittany

     

     

  • South Wales Police Require Outside Investigation

    Count the lies in Police Lawyers Closing Submissions                           BS614159        

    No wonder I was never allowed a jury

    The lawyer defence team for the Defendants Skeleton Closing Submissions, to defend the 1992 -2002 bullying by the South Wales Police, have printed out such a thoroughly misleading account, in well over thirty or so, so far heard, of a hundred or more appalling incidents of criminal conduct, by three Chief Constables, no less, obviously requiring an outside  intervention.

     13 06 24 Kirk v SWP Defendant's Closing Submissions.pdf 

    Talk about blatant Common Purpose, Masonic Plot and the New World Order agenda!

     Is it not time for us to go away and read the small print of political parties such as UKIP?

    At least no one in South Wales can say they have not been warned of things yet to come.

     The countless written lies that are so fraudulent and so contrary to what is on court transcript, witness statements and 20 years of stored Claimant court exhibits, the matter should not be left to the HM discretion of a single judge but be reported to an outside police force immediately.

    Truth Will Out

    Counter submissions, the actual facts rather than a fairy tale, will be published later after my proposed visit to Avon and Somerset Police with the complaint.

    [Much of evidence, contradicting these defence submission, is already on the last three months of blogs]

    (My telephone number for more is 07907937953)

     

    SAMPLE of Claimant's closing submissions

     

    DANGEROUS POLICE HELICOPTER CHASE AROUND ST HILARY TV MAST

    2nd Action Paragraph 7 

    Yet another account riddled with pre confirmed lies due to the usual information, available to the lawyers, of any aircraft movement in a controlled air space

    Para 295

    No, not true the helicopter flew double that distance

    No, not ‘suspected’, police already knew the Claimant was pending the successful Taunton Crown court appeal requiring no evidence needed to be given. (difficult not to be prosecuted for 'low flying' when landing in a farmer's field for lunch.

    Para 301

    This outrageous account of launching a hugely expensive helicopter just to assess who the pilot was!!!

    All it required was to look in log books of aircraft/pilots onboard/ ring ATC Gloucester for records/ get ATC Cardiff to ask or simply send the Llantwit Major’s police car two miles to landing strip and enquire after the aircraft had landed.

    Police identifying the pilot as being in the front ‘pilot’s seat was a joke, in itself, assuming a WW2 J3 L4 is usually piloted so. Which seat did I fly from when I then flew her to Australia, solo and stuffed with fuel cans?

    No, they kept no safe distance and in fact, it was all very dangerous, as close as the length of the court room, plus a foot or two.

    Both pilots confirmed it was illegal, inside the 500ft Air Navigation Order rule. unless the police had a justifiable reason to put so many lives at stake?

    Interesting how the ATC Cardiff asked G-KIRK to orbit until the police helicopter arrived. We could have diverted and landed, quite easily, at the Cardiff police heliport, in time we were made to wait, if the matter was so very urgent.

    Paragraph 303

    No. The radar facilities at Cardiff cannot measure distances between such aircraft to ensure safety

    No, not true. To prove the point of just how dangerous it was the two helicopter crew both had to admit they each lost sight of the cub for sufficient time to get her an imaginary five second burst from a WW1 Lewis machine gun, ‘up their tail’.

     The CAA should have investigated the police dangerous prank but I was not going to report another pilot simply being black mailed by a bunch of bullys sitting at HQ calling the shots.

    Paragraph 306

    All part of the police bullying, harassment and ‘money no object’ mentality, following the Claimant only because:

    I)      being blamed for their Chief Inspector’s daughter' miscarriage,

    ii)   ‘sour grapes’ Guernsey asking to ‘put the knife in’ as it carried far too an embarrassing consequence if the outstanding ‘open arrest warrant’ for the Claimant’s was to be implemented

    iii)   and not let us not forget their anger of their recent string of lost prosecutions, against the Claimant, ‘stitched up’ yet again, by too many, proving malice.

     

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGb6fy9IH4c

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTRW2JM4VOk

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Barristers David Gareth Evans & Rachael Anthony on Oath

     

    Draft Restraining Order Found!!

    The 1st December 11 draft restraining order, re harassment conviction of an unusual police psychiatrist, hand written by District Judge John Charles, was mysteriously suddenly found yesterday in Cardiff magistrates in a hearing denied the usual press coverage.

    Produced by Barrister David Gareth Evans first complaining I had assaulted him during by my private person’s arrest for his continuing abuse of his position as Her Majesty whilst prosecuting in a UK British Court this revelation is a break through to go back to Lord Leveson at the Criminal Court of Appeal.

    My 23rd April 2013 arrest of this lawyer, carried out following indication the South Wales Police would not investigate on my behalf, as to how this HM Crown Prosecutor, David Gareth Evans of 9 Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, had clearly perverted the course of justice AND the offence is still on going. when he originally watched NHS (Wales) doctor, the complainant in the original harassment summary hearing, have me registered his mental patient simply so he could not be cross examined by me!

    I politely warned the visiting district judge, a Mr Layton, believed to be from outside Wales, that until this doctor and those hell bent in conspiring with him, to have me either shot or incarcerated for life, by blocking the GMC from intervening, then he would being seeing a lot of me in his courts as each new charge is fabricated.

     It all stinks, doesn’t it? But what is new under the sun where UK law courts are concerned?

    This now disclosed draft restraining order has been deliberately withheld from me, not just for my countless failed bail applications but my 1st March 12 Cardiff Crown Court of Appeal against imprisonment, the 4th May 12 jury trial, for being in breach of it with a further vindictive stretch of imprisonment when I was never served with a restraining order in the first place1

    Even my 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal applications, before Lord Leveson et al and my current Judicial Review application, again blocked by the HM Cardiff Cabal, for this very court hearing to be adjourned, is a scandal in itself.

    Both HM Court Service and HM Crown Prosecution Service had previously deniedall knowledge’ of such a hand written document which now only leaves the one, unless this was this one that my human rights workers saw being brought back from the cells, on 1st December 2011, following my refusal to read it yet alone approve of it?

    Yesterday's conspiracy, with an empty public gallery, unfolded further by the ‘finding’ of another draft version actually stapled to it!!!!!

     

    This version, with no hand writing on it, other than my own made in the 4th May 12 Cardiff Crown Court dock, was the ‘draft’ the very minute Evans had produced it from ‘out of a hat’. It followed the judge’s order, the day before, to ‘go find it’. [This followed Evans’ admission that he may need to be Mr Kirk’s defence witness as the ‘hand written draft’ was still up in his Merthyr Tydfil CPS office.

    Despite admitting the day before, before both the trial judge Curran QC, my friends in the public gallery and Mackenzie Friend in the dock, he had a typed a version, he had handed this same one, now in the 2013 Cardiff magistrates court, to District Judge John Charles, on 1st Dec 11 to promptly scrawl all over it with his fountain pen, to ‘beef it up’, before ordering it be taken down to the cells for my so called ‘approval’.

    The apparent criminal conduct of barrister Ms Anthony, from Middle Temple, London, was possibly worse, shipped in to give the impression of ‘no bias’ or real risk of bias, when I was refused the right to have the case heard outside South Wales.

    Iscoed Chambers is Swansea and outside South Wales Police territory

    Ms Anthony repeatedly mislead the court by telling the also ‘shipped in’ district judge, ‘there was nothing on file’, at Cardiff CPS HQ and that there was no letter or telephone CPS record from either my Bristol based solicitors or Cardiff based barrister for basic or section 8 disclosure.......

    .....the bl**dy lying little b*tch or was she simply lied to by Cardiff CPS? Either way, she had a duty to the court first.

    This very abuse is rife now in Cardiff courts and no doubt, elsewhere and is the major reason why the once revered UK adversarial system, a solicitor implanted between client and court advocate, is so strongly fought to be maintained?

    For after over forty years of experience in London's Royal Courts of Justice, Taunton, Hampshire, Guernsey and Jersey, time and time again, I have witnessed barristers lying, through their back teeth, on oath or appearing to lie, as the little game is to keep the judge sweet and not compromised while their bank balances continue to swell. 

    [Despite my personal experience I still strongly support the basic principle of a solicitor needing to put up with the, oh so often, awkward client and all his irrelevancies leaving the barrister to remain uncluttered with the job in hand and not with the baggage some clients bring along to the table!].

    [ I fear still further break down of our judicial system, shortly, as more and more litigants in person (LiPs) are forced to conduct their own cases so often bringing mayhem to an already mysterious system based on discretion and not, apparently, the rule of law.] 

    1. the instructing solicitor gathers the evidence and prepares the case for the Crown

    2. the solicitor, in this case HM Crown Prosecution Service, Cardiff, hands the file to the barrister often on his or her arrival, usually by train, at court

    3. this is where it all gets rather murky. A need to know basis is the art behind good advocacy .

    4.  In yesterday's trial for example, just as in my recent three month civil action against the police, when ever the prosecuting barrister (or defence barrister) is asked something he or she already knows the truth over some fact or other but body language, hand signals and facial expressions etc. come into play. such communication of information, not recorded on tape or clerk of court written record, between the thee players, the judge, the barrister and team of instructing solicitors sitting quietly behind can so often go unnoticed by the unsuspecting client in the dock!

    5. Yesterday was a classic, for example, over reasons why the case should obviously been adjourned. Time and time again it was obvious her replies were because she had been either withheld information, as to my numerous attempts to have relevant documents to be disclosed or she already knew.

     BUT did she know that or was she told 'don't ask'? 

    6. This Swansea visiting barrister may have left the court with unblemished character but both Mackenzie Friend and myself may well think otherwise.  

    Having suffered more than twenty years of this kind of inherent deceit in Cardiff law courts I promptly summoned my barrister who, by sheer coincidence, was just outside the door 0f Number 2 magistrates court and to come in and told both judge and bent barristers, the truth. [Evans stated he had never seen the prosecution's CCTV footage]

    Not only had my barrister written to the Cardiff CPS, for obviously needed disclosure, on my behalf but his letter to me was up on my website, with his permission, he having also made numerous telephone calls to both CPS HQ and CPS lawyer, Tony Dicken, re my one million pound damages claim against the NHS (Wales) forensic psychiatrist.

     CPS barrister Richard Tohmlow had already applied to His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC that I be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, for life, as medical reports stated I suffered ‘significant brain damage’, a possible brain tumour when diagnosed with 'paranoid delusional disorder' in that I believed the South Wales police were persecuting me. Well, "perish the thought"!.

     Incidentally neither the Cardiff judge nor the CPS ever notified me I was registered MAPPA level 3, one from the top 5% most dangerous still breathing in the UK

     

    09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf 

     

    09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf 

     

     

    With both Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable and the rogue doctor, in clandestine Caswell Clinic multiple meetings, having me registered MAPPA level 3 and jailed for trading in illicit machine guns, just what will the cabal dream up next, I wonder?

    My barrister went on to say, to an unusually listening judge for Cardiff, that the civil action was seriously entwined with these criminal proceedings and needing the basic ‘disclosure’ for both of the South Wales Police conspiracy, hatched as far back as May 1993, as the on going three month trial has just proved, to block my seven damages claims, against them, due my being bullied with malicious prosecutions, false imprisonments and refusal to investigate crime on my behalf. 

    This caused adjournment and lengthy telephone calls by the London barrister to those in Cardiff’s CPS who, of course, should have been in court from the start with all the answers and so face the ‘music’.

    Just another example as to why my tape recording of the court proceedings was not allowed, needed as we no longer have a ‘free press’ and because our British legal fraternity are still privileged to be allowed such a perverse adversarial system, too often before our very eyes, riddled with criminal conspiracies, such as what yesterday’s hearing exposed and remaining unpunished.  

    The visiting judge ordered the production of the unsealed 'brown envelope', as well, with secret orders to the 1st Dec 11 district judge from His honour judge Llewellyn Jones QC, inadvertently slipped out of the Cardiff cabal's hoard of embarrassing docs, amongst HM Court Service clerk of the court records, asked for and denied to my May 12 jury.

     The Cardiff Crown Court, shortly, will willingly, no doubt, have it produced to crush my many recent convictions, in the name of so called 'justice' now the author has retired.

     

     

     

    Clearly, yet another set of criminal proceedings must be instigated somehow while this current matter is on a deliberately delayed Cardiff Crown Court appeal, like last time, in order to force the Cardiff cabal to give disclosure of simple public documents.

    It appears, as I pleaded to the visiting judge to intervene, to be the only way to have my erroneous Caswell Clinic Prison, Bridgend,  medical records totally expunged and for the culprits to be sent to prison.

    Early on in yesterday's proceedings I recommended to the court some sort of restraint order aught to be handed down, which I would eagerly agree to, in that I had no wish to approach or arrest this crook, again, as I was filing private prosecution papers, anyway, as my complaint to the Bar Council, sent out from the prison had achieved the expected. 

    If and when I receive any restraining order it will join my appeal already lodged at Cardiff Crown Court asking, again, for an outside police force, to investigate the widespread unchecked corruption throughout so many performing in South Wales law courts.

    Just been tipped off the cabal are up to having me sectioned 42 as a 'vexatious litigant' again, with the aid of the bottomless pockets of the British tax payer.

     

     

     

    'screen saver', while the 'dypsos' open their next gin bottle. at Alderney talks

    ROUGH COPY Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police BS614159.docx

     

    To be continued..........

  • Common Assault Trial 25th June Arrest of HM Crown Prosecutor Totally without Merit?

    THE BACK GROUND

    12 04 21 MJK REDACTED Psychiatric Summary.pdf

    13 01 27 SWP Dr MJK to Morgan Cole HHJ SL.pdf 

    1970's Taunton Somerset police station back door, before the camera and sign on it  was quickly installed following the collapse of fire arms allegations in Taunton Magistrates, with proven perjury from information within some missing chief inspector's personal note book

    This weekend's latest police forced encounter was my visit to the police station, to lay theft charges, which soon appeared to cause the perambulation of my vehicle some five or six times around a Barry round about for the driver to receive a road side breath test.

     

    THE INCIDENT

    On 23rd April 2013 David Gareth Evans was arrested in the foyer of the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre under CCTV coverage.

    I asked for the CCTV record to be preserved.

    I asked the HM court staff to call the police.

    PRIOR TO POLICE INTERVIEW

    I instructed lawyers to obtain relevant disclosure, under the control of police, Crown Prosecution Service and HM court Service, for meaningful legal argument, in higher courts but as of 23rd June 2013 all Cardiff institutions have refused.

     This is one of the reasons

    This is another

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/maurices_picks/Abuse-of-Process.aspx 

     

    THE INTERVIEW UNDER CAUTION

    The arrested CPS lawyer had, with malice aforethought, manipulated criminal allegations against me, for example, by 

    a) fabricating a court exhibit, at the very last moment, of an internally post office re directed franked letter, containing a WANTED poster, purported to have been posted by me to the Caswell Clinic. It was  only introduced as evidence at the beginning of evidence by the psychiatrist because Evans had overlooked the fact that none of the other six allegations of harassment carried no custodial sentence.

    b) avoiding 'evidence in chief' from the psychiatrist that he had fabricated that I had' significant brain damage' and a possible brain tumour due to South Wales Police 'pressure' (black-mail over a fellow psychiatrist, a Dr Janis Hillier) for justification for registering me as MAPPA level 3 and jailed, facing a mandatory 10 year sentence, over some dilapidated and decommissioned WW1 machine gun, sold a year earlier and still bolted to a replica display aircraft sitting many hundreds of miles away in an open hangar! http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/news/latestnews/5000624.Barry_s__Flying_Vet__Maurice_Kirk_cleared_of_firearms_charges/ 

     c) misleading the jury, at the May 2012 trial for  'breach of a restraining order', when he knew I had never had been served, in the Magistrates cells on 1st December 2011, a final copy of a restraining order as both court  and custody records clearly confirm

    This lawyer had already informed His Honour Judge Curran, before an audience of witnesses, that the 'draft' part hand written document, that had originally been ordered by District Judge John Charles to be taken down to my cell for approval, was still in 'his control' and still at the Merthyr Tydfil CPS office. Why this court document was not  stored in the HM magistrates, with a breach indictment now laid, beggars belief.

    Is that why, ever since, neither HM court, GEOamey Custodial Services or CPS head office (Cardiff), refuse to disclose anything!

    d) misleading the magistrates in refusing me bail, for most of last summer, following this same police psychiatrist fabricating yet another S9 witness victim statement this time stating I that had been around to the home of Dr Janis Hillier and himself requiring the police to be called to 'move him on'.

     I knew not nor do I wish to know where either of them live which may explain why the police continue to refuse to disclose my multi page statement of complaint dictated to a PC Holder nor furnish this coming trial with the psychiatrist's 21st July 12 or thereabouts, complaint that had me incarcerated with all allegations eventually dropped

    e) misleading the court in refusing me bail, because of my failure to attend a 28th Nov 11 hearing, when the Cardiff prison had been instructed by the  CPS not to produce me

    f) misleading successive courts into stating I had an 'actual bodily harm' conviction in 1980.

    this list is not exhaustive 

     

    THE FACTS 

     As much as I would like to publish the evidence, to be used on Tuesday 25th June 2013 at Cardiff Magistrates, the risk of contaminating the truth prevents me from so doing.

    My having called for police, whilst placing the arrest under the video camera in the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, will implicate the nefarious conduct of so many since the Dolmans, solicitors, fabricated 25th February 2009 sworn affidavit was signed by the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, denying police broke into my Cardiff veterinary surgery or there were Barry magistrates hearings all relating to covert surveillance and collusion with Guernsey's insular authorities. 

    Both Cardiff's judiciary and penal systems are, time after time, shown to be adversely affected by to 'HM's sinister influence and in particular that of the conduct HM court staff's repeatedly failing to disclose public records such as the jury asked for.

    Ring leaders include Luigi Stranati , HM area court manger for South Wales who has attempted, since at least as far back as 2003, to have me registered as a Section 42 'Vexatious Litigant'.

    On 1st December 2011 many litigants in person (LiPs) in the magistrates' public gallery saw David Gareth Evans, CPS prosecutor, hand up to District Judge John Charles, in our so called open court system, the CPS draft version of a proposed 'restraining order' against me following my conviction under 1998 Prevention of Harassment Act over fabricated NHS psychiatric reports to obtain my level 3 MAPPA status.

    to 'protect' the 'victim'  from further harassment. 

    Judge Charles put short shrift to its content and boldly and set about altering the document, by way of his fountain pen and then instructed the clerk to have it taken down to me, in the cells, for my 'approval'.

    I neither read the document nor would have anything to do with it, save a glance of it in the jailer's hand, quite unaware of its relevance. He took it out of my cell and I assume, returned it to the CPS or court clerk.

    Either way it promptly 'disappeared' with my sudden release with no final 'restraining order' or knowledge of it, coming my way. HM controlled CCTV camera stragegically placed at the exit gate of the custody suite, controlled by Stranati, was denied disclosure but compounded by the fact that five angry GEO Amey private jailers, for being kept waiting after 5pm. had fisickly thrown me out through the door followed by my pair of crutches being thrown onto my head as I lay prostrate on the concrete. 

    Why?

    Gareth David Evans had overlooked the fact that the six allegations of my harassing a NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic member of staff failed to include an incident that carried the statutory custodial sentence should I be found guilty when I had been in prison for many months already.

    Coupled with the court's shock of seeing ten of my friends and human rights workers in the public gallery, at the beginning of the trial and 'blow by blow' coverage of daily proceedings on internet sites, world wide, the Welsh press censorship being legendary, Evans slipped in the seventh allegation, of my having sent a 'WANTED' poster by post to a doctor.

    My deliberate act, following the updated list being handed to me in the 'dock', of screwing it up and throwing it to the ground, had the desired effect by it being published in the Glamorgan Gem.

    The 4th May 2012 Crown Court jury, following the alleged breach of the so called order, heard that the cell incident, of the FINAL document being officially served on a prisoner upon his release, was all caught on a series of CCTV cameras and the drafting and final production of the finishing 'restraining order' were 'recorded' in the HM court records.

    HM Judge Curran QC refused the jury any of it, having received their jury note, stating there was no such evidence 'available' leaving the jury without explanation. Why?

    Barrister Evans had old the judge, in front of both myself and my Mackenzie Friend, MB, that  he may now have to be a defence witness because of his part hand written part typed draft, brought down into my cell on 1st Dec11, was up in Merthyr Tydfil CPS office.

    So why didn't the judge stop the trial? 

     

     Lord Leveson, later, at the Criminal Court of Appeal, appeared to do likewise. Why?

    The judge, on Tuesday, will have had HM orders to block the truth coming out by labelling my reasons for the arrest 'totally without merit'. Why ?

    ANSWER 

    The Continuing cover up of my 2009 fabricated Caswell Clinic psychiatric reports for Barbara Wilding to obtain my MAPPA level 3 registration to frustrate the on going civil actions against her.

    TRUTH must not come out

     

    THE CHARGE

    Police continue to withhold custody records and send me the wrong DVD while Cardiff court continue to refuse to disclose the record (court log), the jury had asked for, that a draft restraining order or even final order being produced before I was 'gate arrested', in the magistrates foyer and taken to London in hand cuffs  for 'failing to attend court' two days earlier! HMP Cardiff had refused to produce me and that 'failure to attend court' conviction has been used, ever since, to successfully oppose my bail.

    Wrong video? Deliberate?

    Private Prosecution.wmv

     

    My Judicial Review Application is BLOCKED

    As with RCJ Morgan J, over South Wales Police  ring leaders in the Cardiff hushed up three month trial, the government is left with blocking exposure of the ever increasing corruption in the judiciary and those profit from it, by now blocking members of the public applying for judicial reviews or calling for 'protected' deceitful doctors/lawyers, working for the police, to be properly investigated

    See rough template for your MP to receive, asap, to be 'aware' before it is too late.

     13 06 24 JR format to MPs.docx

     

    I AM STILL REGISTERED AS A MENTAL PATIENT.......Deliberate? Or just the 'gulag card; dealt again?

     My Bristol solicitor and Cardiff barrister are continued to be refused Crown Court copy of all the exhibits in first, the 1st Dec 11 Magistrates appeal, re harassment conviction, in 1st March 12 Judge Hughes hearing and secondly, in May 2012 jury trial, re 'breach of a restraining order' I never had served on me in the first place!

    These few examples of wide spread criminal conduct is best described as a new form of a liturgy worshipped but causing serious  judicial 'melt down' of a system that this country was once very proud about

    So could South wales Police so stoop in my civil action?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23022634?print=true#story_continues_1%23story_continues_1.

  • South Wales Police Covert Serveillance Case Dramatically Shortened by High Court Section 42 Proposed Ruling

     HARASSMENT?

    In a minute I visit my sixth GP practice in another desperate attempt to have someone in the NHS (Wales) to finally correct my Caswell Clinic 2009 psychiatric Records fabricated then purely to have me registered MAPPA level 3 if the 'machine gun' allegation failed.

    South Wales Police had and still have a 'hold' over him and his wife and yet no one else in the NHS system, appropriately qualified will be a seen correcting my medical records that are currently stopping me now from setting off to South Africa and the Falkland Islands in my WW2 D-Day Piper Cub, registration G-KURK.

    This CPS barrister had every opportunity to rectify the anomaly, not once , not twice but at least seven times in a series of 'harassment' and then 'reach of restraining orders' vindictive prosecutions, anything to block the starting my 20 year running three month damages claim and allow proof exposed of a thoroughly deceitful doctor SUPPORTED BY THE SYSTEM 

    The Chief Constable of South Wales Police

    Bridgend HQ

    16th June 2013

     

    Dear Sir,

    Statement of Complaint

    Theft

    I have now had a number of articles, including my post, stolen from my Cardiff flat. I keep the flat locked at all times when I am not there and there is a very short list of those with duplicate keys.

    Criminal Damage

    Would this relate to your officers failing to recover stolen articles from my car, the week before last or allow me to identify the culprit who broke into my car, outside the flat, by my viewing the CCTV?

    Fraud

    Does this relate to anything over a short conversation I had, only this week with a neighbour, over my having been reported for fraud, apparently and also deception but possibly explaining why police had to attend my flat premises for over an hour and requiring a paddy wagon?

    Damages Claims against South Wales Police & NHS (Wales)

    Could this also relate to the ongoing civil damages claims, in Cardiff County Court, against yourself or the pending one million pound damages claims, malicious prosecutions, some being relisted later this week? They include the strange case over some old WW1 machine gun attached to a replica WWI biplane and another over the covering up NHS (Wales) staff and a police psychiatrist?

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/_A300_100_2C00_000-Machine-Gun-Reward.aspx

     (After a 'rabbit shoot')

    12 04 21 MJK REDACTED Psychiatric Summary.pdf

    Barricaded Flat Entrance

    Is my finding that I am now separated from my own legal papers in the flat, some due for delivery to the County Court, today, is of your doing or can I ask for your officers attendance in order that I may force an entry?

    Could I have your intentions, please?

    Yours 

     Maurice J Kirk BVSc

    P.S.  The last time this flat required police assistance, on 6th June 1993, your then Chief Inspector Brian Genner, with the help of Sergeant Brian Roe, used a crow bar and a sledge hammer to gain entry but causing his own daughter to miscarriage all of which, apparently, was blamed on me.

    95 07 22 Sgt Roe St.pdf

     

    A photo of police (an inspector and sergeant, apparently) outside my Cardiff flat

     

     

     

     

    13 06 12 Police Complaint re Tax Payer's money.docx 

    13 06 14 Claimant Position Statement BS614159.docx

     

     

     

     No more 'HM' court time has been 'allocated' or the trial judge just wishes not to hear any more evidence, apparently,for the completion of this Claimant's twenty year running damages claims leaving only the 'closing speeches' on 23rd July 13 to finish the case, subject to any appeal.

    It is arguable that these and other cases, in the long stayed queue, have been delayed by those who really decide as to just what goes on in our UK law courts. The Claimant's consequential loss, following his countless imprisonments and being sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act so many times, of carefully stored evidence has been phenomenal.

    On the promise of a jury, as far back as1993, the Claimant instructed Bristol lawyers to bring a series of damages claims against the South Wales Police in an attempt to simply to stop the harassment and finally 'get them off his back' when all he wished to do was to go about his chosen vocation, uninterrupted, as a veterinary surgeon in the Vale of Glamorgan.

    From June 1993, in Cardiff and between December 1992 to October 1993, in Barry, following a series of arson, motoring and tenancy dispute incidents, requiring the Claimant to seek assistance from his local constabulary, chance communications with the wrong Guernsey police officers led to, some would say, an act of vengeance and damned what it cost.

    Some within the Barry and Cardiff police then set about a 'course of conduct' argued by the Claimant as both unusual and extreme acts of bullying heavily reliant on their 'HM' Partnership's cosy relationship from within their own courts hoping their chosen victim would not make the distance.

    Twenty years on and the Claimant now finds himself faced with recent court rulings appearing to both shorten proceedings and indicate the need, perhaps, for the maintaining or otherwise of the age old 'hot potato', the level of a 'judge's discretion' in this, such an unusual case.

    Could the rulings relate to this 5th August 2003 HM Treasury Solicitor letter, I wonder, smuggled, most likely, out of the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre in the dead of night starting the 'Section 42 'Vexatious Litigant registration procedure to ban my right in ever getting access to a UK court under the rule of UK law?

    03 08 05 HM Attorney G Vex Litigant Enq_0001.pdf

     03 07 23 HM Attorney General Steps In.pdf

     

    The Right to tape record ones own criminal or civil proceedings

    Also needing informed debate are the other recent court orders, below, concerning the right for a litigant in person (LiP) to have possession, if only temporary, of supervised taped recordings of evidence to indicate, at least, some semblance of 'equality in arms' in our UK adversarial court system.

    13 05 30 SWP ASL Ruling.pdf

    13 04 24 Tape Order.pdf

    13 04 18 barrister cont note re Tape Appl.pdf

    13 06 07 RCJ 8 2.23 Morgan J Application for key players.pdf 

    13 06 07 RCJ Tape Wit Refused Morgan Order.docx

     

    A little word of advice

    Any one thinking of bringing civil actions against any Welsh authority by deliberately starting it in England, as I was advised by Bristol lawyers, to get a fair trial or 20 years later, then lodge an appeal in London, as I deliberately travelled to do, to avoid the stench of the Cardiff Cabal, please note the seal on the Order handed down by the very same judge that blocked all the politically sensitive incidents , last year, in my 20 years of hell.

     

     

    More Extortionate Court Costs

    The high court judge taxed the police £6,23&.50p by deducting it by £237.50p!

    A good example of the usual 'HM gravy train' tactics, in UK courts, anything to deter those who cannot find legal representation they can trust.....rather a 'catch 22 situation, isn't it?

    The QC, trailing barrister and crew were not needed to speak, of course but could only claim if they all attended.

    The telephone conferences, to guaranteeing of blocking key police officers and a meeting in chambers, ex parte no doubt, could have all been done for the barrister to be back on the train even before the case was listed to start.

     

    A few of the 'incidents' were motoring

    SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

    13 05 05 REDACTED Statement of Insurance Agent.pdf

    95 03 22 Guernsey RoadTax letter.pdf

     

    A few other incident may also indicate 'intent'.

    I am arrested outside my Cardiff surgery for stealing my own Guernsey registered BMW motor bike and jailed in Cardiff prison until identified!

    Real Enid Blyton stuff !

     

    Are YOU next?

    Cardiff police contact Guernsy police over the bike, bought from a policeman, a Mr Farnham of music fame.

    93 05 20 Pt ONE Jailed forTheft Unidentified _0002.pdf

    93 05 20 PtTWO Jailed forTheft Unidentified .pdf

    93 05 20 Pt THREE Jailed forTheft Unidentified.pdf

    93 05 20 Pt FOUR Jailed forTheft Unidentified .pdf

    93 05 20 Pt FIVE Jailed forTheft Unidentified.pdf

    93 SWP Fairwater Tape.pdf

     

    And a sample of others

     

     13 05 04 Receptionis st.pdf

    13 05 12 Gafael st.pdf

    95 07 22 Sgt Roe St.pdf

     

    10 year history of my litigation attempting to avoid being 'struck off' as a veterinary surgeon

    02 10 22 Justice and Victims Unit .pdf

    02 10 22 Part TWO Justice and Victims Unit .pdf

    part three later

     

    And it all came from, this Cardiff court heard, South Wales Police first contacting GUERNSEY police on 20th May 1993, with me in custody, in Fairwater, Cardiff, police station cells, on the pretext I could not be identified!!!!!!!!!!!

    The following day Cardiff magistrates sent me to prison until I was identified....the state of our future or what?

    but the commander of Barry police had long discussions with Guernsy police in December 1992 trying to stitch me up for arson , the the burning out of my WW2 D-Day Piper Cub;

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx

     

     

     Outside HM Supreme Court 

    Delivery, with  Genevieve, of my appeal to HM Privy Council to intervene,  following complaint by South Wales Police that had my name, for life removed from the UK veterinary register. 

     

    And now something completely different

    the final two pages of Pilot Magazine article after the 2001 London to Sydney Air Race (previous pages at bottom of previous blogs)

    Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (6).pdf  

     Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (7).pdf

     

    Burma War Auster

     

     

     

    .. 

     

  • Mr Justice Morgan Protects Police Ring Leaders-Appeal Totally without Merit?

    HM Conspiracy to Block NHS Psychiatrist & Machine Gun Cases Confirmed yet Again?

    Yesterday, in the HM Royal Courts of Justice, my discussions and side bets were clearly settled by Mr Justice Morgan’s predictable judgment reminding long time readers of this web site that it was this very same gentleman that appeared to ignore my doctor’s medical note, last year, stating I was unfit, due to my discharge from hospital with head injuries, to conduct t any court hearing for a while, if that medical certificate, sent to HM Cardiff County Court with an adjournment application, was ever put before him? His reply was interesting when I consider the trouble I have had with HM Cardiff Courts over 'lost' files while trying to get me registered as a 'vexatious litigant'.

    13 06 11 Claimant Position Statement BS614159.pdf

     

     

    HM must stop the 'machine gun' and 'rogue NHS (Wales) psychiatrist' million pound damages claims coming to court. Both NHS and south Wales Police have already had so much adverse exposure and now we have this.....Kirk identifying the ring leaders in the police that should be made to give evidence

     I had just left the Chief Constable's offices escorted by tin hatted machine gun yielding bunch of flack jacketed men weighed down with stun grenades. They knew something I didn't ......a week or so earlier I had been registered there as MAPPA level 3 and could be legally shot if I were to approach her.

     

    Oh, yes what are they looking for after letting my guard dog, Jacque, loose? In the police cell next week I was told it may have been a WW1 Lewis machine gun they knew, far well, sold a year earlier and  was attached to a 1916 replica DH2 biplane..

     

    You needed to be there to picture their faces....the judge, devoid of the relevant paper work, the QC who was promised he need not speak, at all, his fee is guaranteed, the trailing barrister, looking all coy and demure as if butter would not melt in her mouth and lastly,Dolmans' manager, just their to bolster up the size of Adrian Oliver's bill....all of them  pre briefed, even down to the disposal of the quite unnecessary 'consequential' costs, planned if they could , this time, finally hang on him a 'vexatious litigant' life time order and finally bankrupt him.

    I am sure I hear the judge and QC say, "Kirk has the nerve to question our 'gravy train' and cosy relationship"......

    So, all in RCJ court thought, what are the options?

     

    1. For twenty years we have harassed him, locked him up and even had him 'struck off' to stop his income. But he is still here listing  a dozen or so key players in HM or South Wales Police, all guaranteed immunity to prosecution and a fat pension, if Kirk can finally be 'killed off'..

    2. All together, in 2009 we had him stitched up over a 'machine gun' to stop this hearing today but he wriggled out of it and changing the colour of the paint, to fool the jury, failed to work!

    3. Using our tame psychiatrist to have him locked away for life in Ashworth, well, that didn't work either ....we did not look far enough to get a jointly needed signature to back our rogue's fabricated medical records that Kirk's brain damage and cancer made him MAPPA level 3.

    4. If we do not try and get him shot, again, as Barbara Wilding miserably failed at doing, we must have this dangerous application for disclosure and all future actions by Kirk in court as,  'totally without merit'  and charge him punitive costs.

     

     

    Before the High Court, last year, Mr Justice Morgan had struck out or more to the point, upheld each of the police incidents ‘struck out’ by the ongoing trial judge, his Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, being the politically most sensitive ones where I had exposed, beyond reasonable doubt, wide spread corruption in some HM staff within both the Vale of Glamorgan magistrates and Cardiff court systems.

    All I had to do was to quietly introduce the words ‘conspiracy’, ‘Masonic’ and ‘covert police surveillance’ at the appropriate moment , many, many years ago in this three of civil actions for damages, for the key players behind my twenty years of malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments to be ring fenced for special protection.

    My application, yesterday, was in two parts:

    i)                    Supervised tape recording to be allowed in court for the ‘litigant in person’ in a welsh court.

    ii)                  Permission to appeal the trial judge’s refusal for a ‘litigant in person’, not a freemason or worshipper of the devil, to be allowed to call some of those ‘ring fenced’ ‘key players’, mainly senior police officers within or retired from the South Wales Police working out of Cardiff, Barry, Llantwit Major and Cowbridge police stations being the area of my then veterinary general practice.

    Well I won the right to tape record in court which to some is a legal precedent and should be immediately published nationwide.

    What I didn’t achieve, of course, was any costs for the bit of nonsense. Heaven forbid, a ‘litigant in person’ being granted his train fare!!!

    The police legal team, on the other hand, had their full expenses awarded, £6,237..50p signed by A P Oliver of Dolmans and not even properly scrutinised even though they were never needed to speak or even be there in the first place. My bankruptcy was then openly discussed with the QC and the judge if I did not pay within 21 days. 

     It did not help , perhaps, when I told his Lordship that the trial judge had most likely assessed my both ‘unusual and extreme circumstances’ and had used his right to use the wide parameters of HM ‘discretion’ as ‘justice’ as is usually concluded and handed down in all our adversarial type UK law courts. On this rare occasion, albeit fleetingly, His Honour’s ‘discretion’ turned out to be to my advantage.

    it also did not help, I suppose, when I stated it was obvious His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC had been 'nobbled'.

     Mr Justice Morgan refused to be drawn on the fact that why, if I could tape record, of the ninety nine witnesses so far called, police officers in the witness box for two or three days, enough time for the huge police legal team to go berserk and complain to London and their respective local lodges, then why was I so abruptly stopped from tape recording following ex Inspector Robert Nelson Roe being proved such a liar and had committed perjury?

    Mr Roe had just been recalled to the witness box and warned by the trial judge of the consequences of perjury, he previously on oath, having denied all knowledge of both the broad day-light police break-in or even, would you believe, knowing me!

    The court had been told, by eye witness and interested party, Mr Gafael, Mr Roe was outside my Cardiff veterinary surgery on the afternoon of 6th June 1995 with both sets of tenants’ parents when a van load of police swept onto the forecourt. Police piled out armed with both sledge hammer and a crow bar and proceeded to smash down my locked roller shutters closed when the surgery was not in session.

    These police re enforcements had, less than twenty minutes early, just been  called for by ex Chief Inspector Brian Genner, at that point a client of mine, over the theft of some £2000 worth of his ‘evicted’ daughter’s personal belongings  and her apparent miscarriage all blamed on me!

    Interestingly I was arrested within the next couple of days for ‘eviction’ but only under the Tenancy Act with no mention of either theft or of criminal damage. Any alleged breach of the Tenancy Act, incidentally, was, in those days, not an arrestable offence and a matter for the county council.

    Police quickly concocted a plan for the other tenant, not the policeman’s daughter but her then boy friend, a Mr Anthony Glen Gafael, was to be the one ‘evicted’ despite my producing Breton preserved documentary evidence to the contrary.

     Two plain clothed detectives, just ‘doing their job’ and clearly very sheepish over it all, then arrested me one or two days later and interrogated me at Barry police station.

    Several weeks later Mr Roe then interrogated me at Barry police station for a second time adding to the eviction allegation an act of ‘criminal damage’ to the total sum of £20, if police officer Roch’s evidence, also tape recorded, is to be believed.

     Even more bizarre was the fact that the shop keeper next door, who had excitedly telephoned me  to inform me of the police  breaking in, was never interviewed over an ‘alleged’ eviction of a policeman’s daughter,  ‘the alleged’  £2000 theft from her overhead surgery flat when this same shop keeper was both its owner and land lord.

    This blog will continue over the next few days and to include this following document’s relevance and Mr Justice Morgan’s predictable or not response to it.

    13 06 07 RCJ 8 2.23 Morgan J Application for key players.pdf

    This magistrate's aborted hearing was just one of many incidents in the Chief Constable's Feb 09 sworn affidavit described as having never happened.

    I clearly identified the relevance of these police needing to be called, the clerk of the court who had been sent a summons and for the magistrate in Dinas Powis if all else failed. No chance the judge indicated, you will have none of them or the whole pack of cards will come down.

    I moved onto the next magistrate's collapsed hearing, my arresting CPS man Stan Soffa, for perverting the course of justice, switching speed camera photos and despite the defence admitting I had taken him by the 'scruff of the neck; until two car loads of police burst into the court room to lead him away to his cell, the judge refused me any one also present in court.

    The judge looked at his watch as I listed three more key Barry police inspectors, needed to expose the truth, also refused by the trial judge, who had received many of my countless complaint letters and yet evidence from the 'foot soldiers', complained about, said these complaints were a revelation and 'news to them!   

    Once again, as in the past forty years, I had witnessed this spectacle of obscene behaviour by a frilly nickered man, too ashamed to look me straight in the eye, as he abused our basic right of a fair trial, their joint conduct, in the room that day  being taken as the  norm  any of our UK law courts, Except for those in the 'club' any one who sought redress by the 'rule of law' was a fool into thinking it mattered..  

     

    Police video evidence catching bully boy Police Sgt Kilberg from Llantwit Major lying to obtain my custody by telling his sergeant I I was swearing in a public place . .

    Kilberg was then caught out on the other police officer's statement and a string of eye witnesses which  made CPS not touch it with a barge pole.  Kilberg's barbaric assault on me outside my surgery was major evidence in this trial.

    one of many damming witness statements

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBkNCYYfJOE

    Kilberg was also a major player in having me 'struck off' the veterinary register by lying to RCVS and in both Bridgend and Barry Magistrates that I had refused a road side breath test.

    But enough of South Wales Police *** 

    [20 minutes into Barry custody suite video is

    'OUT of COURT' TV David Jessel & Sue Cook documentary on Guernsey' corrupt tax haven

     and some vet on a 35 day hunger strike filmed through hospital window!].

     

    TEST FLIGHT of G-KIRC the only Challis Chaffinch in the World

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tacRcTanQy8

     

    Preparation for South Africa

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmeockxZuXk

     

     

    5th page of Pilot article

    Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (5).pdf

     

  • 7th June 13 Royal Courts of Justice Hearing Right to Tape Record and Call Defendant as Witness

    AN E-MAIL WITH NO RESPONSE

     

    FAO Mr Justice Morgan

     

     

    6th June 2013 12.02pm

    FAO Hearings Cardiff County Court                       BS614159

     

    22nd & 23rd May2013 Claimant Position Statements Ruling

    Further to my visit to the court to collect the 'by Tuesday' ruling, promised at the last day of the hearing, l have telephoned today  about the Claimant being able to refer to it in RCJ on 7th June 13 as the alternative, possibly,  to Barbara Wilding being the subject of the proceedings as past Chief Constable.

    Her 'oh so dodgy' 25th Feb 2009 sworn affidavit was written with malice aforethought and proved in court following 99 witnesses's evidence.

    There is no need for the Defendant's legal team
    to attend as the tape recording issue is not for them.

    If the outstanding ruling is substituted for Mr Justice Morgan to consider then compromise as to which witnesses should still be allowed to give evidence could  be settled between parties NOW

    Without that ruling causes me to remain in some difficulties for tomorrow's RCJ application

    Please forward to RCJ as I still cannot find the RCJ ref number or e-mail.

    Thankyou

     

     

     

     

    28 May 2013   Further ruling on second list of witnesses whom Mr Kirk wishes to call.

    On 29 April 2013, at a time when the Defendant were shortly to call their last witness, Mr Kirk delivered a written list of 44 witnesses whom he wished to call.  On 1st May 2013 I delivered a written ruling identifying which witnesses he was to be permitted to call.  I did so pursuant to the responsibility upon the court to control the evidence by giving directions, and actively to case manage the case, under CPR 32.1 and CPR 1.4.  In that written ruling it I set out the nature of the present proceedings; the Orders which have been made previously, setting out in particular the dates by which witness statements, or witness summaries, had been required to be served; the background from 2008 to date in respect of preparation of the present trial insofar as it permitted or impeded Mr Kirk’s ability to prepare evidence and secure witness statements or summaries; and the principles by which the court is governed in respect of the calling of witnesses. I adopt that in full for the purpose of the present ruling and I do not repeat it here.  

    Since then, Mr Kirk has given evidence over several days and has called 13 witnesses. By a Position Statement dated 22nd May 2013 Mr Kirk served a further written list of some 19 named witnesses he would wish to call.  I stated on 24 May that I would again give ruling in writing.  This is (i) for clarity as to my reasons and (ii) for ease of access to a record of the ruling. I understand that a hearing is listed for Friday 7 June 2013 to consider permission to appeal (and/or appeal itself) against my ruling of 1 May 2013.  I will in this ruling list the witnesses individually in this ruling, as I did in the last, by number and name in Mr Kirk’s list but preceded by a letter “B”, to avoid confusion, assuming that the present ruling may also be the subject of application for permission to appeal.

    B1.       Ex-Inspector Coliandris. This is a former police officer.  In these proceedings the Defendant gave an undertaking to call or tender any witness in respect of whom a witness statement had been lodged, so long as that was a presently serving officer and thus within the control of the Defendant; but expressly did not give that undertaking in respect of any witness who was no longer a serving police officer.  I was told that Mr Coliandris was reluctant to attend court because of his state of health. I am aware that he wrote to the court himself seeking to inform the court confidentially of his state of health and his reservations, but stating that he did not want these details to be made known to Mr Kirk. I declined to read his representations so long as he wished the content of his communications to be kept from one of the parties and I so informed them.  In the event Mr Coliandris was not called and the Defendant did not seek to tender his evidence, whether live or under the Civil Evidence Act.

    Mr Kirk does not articulate the nature of the evidence which he believes Mr Coliandris could give. On the face of his witness statement Mr Coliandris is not a direct witness to any fact or incident in issue.  He appears to have looked into complaint by Mr Kirk, without identifying relevant material evidence. If so, then this appears to be a witness whom Mr Kirk wishes to call blind, in the hope of either fishing for evidence in support of his case or simply cross-examining the witness in support of the same exercise.  I have also sought to be alert to the possibility that a witness might be able to assist, as to the matters in issue, if he is referred to in documents before the court; but I have identified no such reference.

    Accordingly I rule against permission to call this witness.

    B2.       Ex Chief Inspector Trigg. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 15 in the ruling of 1 May 2013.  No new material is advanced. The same considerations apply.  Accordingly I still rule against permission to call Mr Trigg.

     B3.      Mr Brian Genner. This is a witness who has given evidence in relation to the events of 6 June 1995. Mr Anthony Gafael and his girlfriend Alison Genner the daughter of this witness were excluded that day from their flat, an incident which led to prosecution of Mr Kirk, and in respect of which Mr Kirk complains that police officers forced entry through a roller shutter door to Mr Kirk’s premises.  There are discrepancies between the account in the witness statement for these proceedings of Sergeant Roe (as he was in 1995) and others, including Mr Genner, as to when Roe was present or what he did.  In the case of Mr Roe, Mr Kirk produced after Mr Roe’s evidence a statement of the time from Sergeant Roe which appeared clearly inconsistent with what Mr Roe had told me. I therefore permitted Mr Roe, exceptionally, to be recalled for further cross-examination. The inconsistencies have been explored in cross-examination by Mr Kirk and in questions from myself.

    Mr Kirk seeks that Mr Genner be recalled also.  However the evidence of Mr Genner has been given.  The evidence of Anthony Gafael has now been given. If there is material in the evidence of Mr Genner (or Mr Gafael) on which Mr Kirk seeks to rely, or inconsistencies in the evidence between witnesses on which he seeks to rely, that is available in closing submissions and will be for me to consider as in any other case.  Unlike Mr Roe, there is no earlier inconsistent written statement of Mr Genner relied upon (which in any event, if it had been available, ought to have been put to him), nor other proper reason for him to be recalled.    

    B4.       Mr Roe.  He has been recalled once (see above). It would be wholly exceptional for a witness to be recalled for a second time. I have now heard evidence from Mr Gafael. However Mr Kirk identifies nothing new which would justify, and I have failed to identify anything in the evidence of Mr Gafael which would justify, recalling Mr Roe.

    B5.       Ex Chief Inspector Colin Jones.  Mr Kirk states that he is a “key player”. A chief reason for Mr Kirk’s interest is that at one of Mr Kirk’s appeals in the Crown Court a police officer attended as an observer, when he was seen to be nodding towards a police officer PC Rewbridge during the giving of her evidence.  According to Mr Kirk, when asked to explain himself, the police officer said he was attending on instruction from Chief Inspector Colin Jones. Inferentially, Mr Kirk believes that Mr Colin Jones is, or may be, one of the senior police officers whom he passionately believes to have conspired to hound him.  

    As with a number of police officers whom Mr Kirk wished to call in his list of 29 April 2013, (i) there is no statement from the proposed witness (ii) it is wholly unlikely that the witness will give a statement, and (iii) there is no direct evidence of connection of the witness with the specific matters in issue in these proceedings.  I consider that the real wish of Mr Kirk is to cross-examine the witness in the hope that something might turn up; but that there is no discernible prospect that such an exercise would assist the court.

    B6.       Inspector Andrew Rice.  Mr Kirk has submitted on a great number of occasions that Mr Rice should be recalled.  Evidence has been given by a Mr Alexander-Ebbs that he attended Aust Service Station to give a witness statement, in respect of an assault he alleged against Mr Kirk, at a meeting attended by a number of persons including Mr Rice, where he was encouraged to “sex up” his account. However Mr Alexander-Ebbs was present in person at this court on 21st February 2013 during the continued evidence of Mr Rice; gave a witness statement on that day making the allegations against Mr Rice; and these allegations were put to Mr Rice. Otherwise, Mr Kirk assets that Mr Rice must have been aware fo covert surveillance of Mr Kirk; and/or he now wonders whether it was Mr Rice whom he sought to “arrest” outside the magistrates’ court (rather than a Sergeant Hill) when handing over a file which Mr Kirk thought might contain important real evidence.  In my respectful judgment there is, (and there continues to be), no justification for the recall of Mr Rice.

    B7.       Inspector Steve Parry. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 43 in the ruling of 1 May 2013.  No new material is advanced. The same considerations apply.  Accordingly I still rule against permission to call Mr Parry.

    B8.       Jonathan Clayton.   I made ruling in respect of Mr Clayton on 1 May 2013. No witness statement or witness summary has been served in respect of him. He is said to be relevant to the incident of 4 July 1999, but it is not said that he was a direct witness to any of the events of that day. If anything, there is less reason now for him to be called, in that Mr Kirk’s witness Susan Jenkins has given evidence of what is required of those flying from one airport and air traffic control zone to another; and Mr Aishe has given evidence of the closeness of the police helicopter to Mr Kirk’s aircraft  I discern no sufficient or good reason for him to be called.

    B9.       Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding. This is another renewed application – in respect of witness 2 in the ruling of 1 May 2013.  Mr Kirk identifies nothing new. The same considerations apply now as did then.  Accordingly I still rule against permission to call this witness.

    B10.     Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brien. The position statement itself articulates no cause for him to be called.  Orally, Mr Kirk said he was an important witness because he gave evidence which “caused the case [against Mr Kirk] to collapse”. I did not find it easy to follow what this evidence was supposed to be. It seemed to be that an HORT1 form was said by the police officers to have been served upon Mr Kirk, yet no document was ever traced, nor an audit trial provided for such a document, hence the case against Mr Kirk failed.  However, to the extent that this is right, Mr Kirk may in any event rely upon it. 

    This is an incident of May 1995. in which Mr Kirk shows particular interest, in that Special Constable Deren Martin says that she served him with an HORT1 form; and has given evidence that she made enquiries with the police in Guernsey (in pursuit of whether Mr Kirk’s vehicle was or was not exempt from vehicle excise licence), being told that there was warrant for his arrest outstanding. This fuels Mr Kirk’s suspicion and belief that he was the subject of harassment by police in Wales because of his past travails with Guernsey police.      

     Nonetheless, it seems to me that Mr O’Brian is a paradigm case of a proposed witness from whom there is no witness statement or summary, no reason to suppose that the witness (if he can be found) will give a statement, no indication whether he would remember whether another officer served an HORT1 firm on Mr Kirk on a day 18 years ago, SC Deren Martin being the officer in the case, and one whom Mr Kirk hopes to cross-examine despite him being called as his own witness, in the hope that something might turn up. Accordingly I decline to give permission for this witness to be called.

    B11.     Ex SC Ridley. Mr Kirk tells me, (if I have succeeded in following him correctly),  that Mr Ridley was the investigating officer for the same incident as resulted in police photographs being taken of his vehicle (as was done for SC Deren Martin for the May 1995 incident). Similar considerations apply as with SC O’Brien. So far as I can see, this is fishing in the dark.  In default of witness statement, or the beginnings of a witness summary, I cannot justify permission to call the witness.      

    B12.    Mrs Diana Graham. Mr Kirk asks for a “foreign witness summons”. This witness lives in France. The Claimant’s Witness Bundle includes at page 91-123 a statement, not in proper form, by this witness with associated documents.  The bulk of the statement relates to the proceedings which followed the Vale of Glamorgan Show incident of August 1998, (Action 3, “2”).  This is one of the claims struck out by my rulings of November 2010. Accordingly that which relates to it is not now material.

    Much of the rest relates to how Mr Kirk was dealt with on occasions in court, by magistrates (and occasionally by judges, including judges in the Divisional Court), some of it clearly recording what Mr Kirk said to her and some although much less clearly being personal observation on the part of Mrs Graham.  I informed the parties that I would read this statement and discard all that related to the Vale of Glamorgan Show.  I do not envisage that Mrs Graham could assist me significantly further by giving evidence orally and, as I have made clear on a number of occasions, it is not permissible to call a witness in the hope that she might add something further which is not contained either in a witness statement or witness summary. Not least, if there were anything material for Mrs Graham to add, the time has long passed when such material was required to be lodged with the court. I will treat the statement as admitted in evidence, but I will make no further order.

    B13.     Mr Gafael.  He has now been called, since I directed steps for bailiff service of Notice to show Cause which secured his attendance on 24 May 2013.

    B14.     G. Thomas. Without agreeing the content of the statement, the Defendant is content that the statement be read.   The same applies to a Mr Kirke (as to maintenance of tyres on vehicles of Mr Kirk), whom Mr Kirk raised orally on 23 May 2103 as a potential witness.

     B15.    Nigel Thomas.  This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 30 in the ruling of 1 May 2013.  No statement has been produced. No new material is advanced and the same considerations apply as before. I rule against deferment of conclusion of the evidence in order for him to be searched for and thus against permission to call Mr Thomas.

    B17.     Mrs Kirstie Kirk. In the event she has been called.

    B18.     Mrs G Jones. This appears not to be pursued by Mr Kirk.

    B19.     Mrs J Hanson.  Mr Kirk told me that he had ‘lost her statement’.  In fact there is a letter from her at page 168 (Claimant’s Witness Bundle) which raises complaint about disturbance from his wayward tenants.  Mr Kirk and Barry police officer witnesses whom I have heard agree the problems with alcoholism, and bad behaviour on the part of his tenants, in particular a Mr Paul Stringer and a Mr Burns. Oral evidence from Mrs Hanson, not found or available to date, is not reasonably necessary for me to deal justly with the matters in issue.

    With the exception of one witness, there is no other witness whom Mr Kirk wishes to call. That exception is B16, a Michael Murphy. The Defendant made clear a considerable time ago that that it objected to reception of the evidence without the opportunity to cross-examine the witness. No witness summons was served in respect of this witness. Mr Kirk told me on Friday 24 May that he had expected the witness to be present voluntarily that day. However there was, and has been since, no communication to the court from the witness.

    It is understandable that the Defendant should object to his short statement being admitted without the opportunity to cross-examine him. The statement is one compiled by Mr Kirk in September 2010, with an added signature of the witness, and in manuscript the words “content below relating to me is true to the best of belife(sic)”.  It describes him as a scrap dealer previously reported for stealing a veterinary practice car back in 1996 (presumably Mr Kirk’s veterinary practice); and the police are said to have told the witness on the one hand “I want you to take it back immediately to Penarth police station, where I will later inform Kirk it has been traced” and on the other hand one of the police is said to have jumped into the scrap dealer’s cab and himself to have driven it to Penarth: the two clearly conflict.  On the other hand the statement reads that the police told him “We hate Kirk’s guts” and that the policeman said he would “have the greatest of pleasure in booking Kirk when he comes to collect it and drives it away without tax, MOT or insurance”.  

    The failure to appear without explanation, to support the statement such as I have described it, is not a prepossessing basis to ask for the court to appoint another day of hearing.  If all, or even some, of Mr Kirk’s complaints of police harassment and bad faith are upheld, on the other evidence I have heard over some 49 days, the evidence of the scrap dealer suspected of stealing the practice car in 1996 will be peripheral; if few, or none are upheld it will be improbable that the evidence of Mr Murphy would tilt the balance on any of them.  The court has gone to what I consider to be extreme lengths, in order to accommodate genuine difficulties to Mr Kirk in preparing his case, and those which are of his own making; and has granted great latitude to him in calling witnesses despite failure to serve statements in the form and by the dates stipulated. Applying the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly and proportionately, I do not consider it reasonably necessary that the court should appoint another day for hearing of evidence in the case of this witness.

    28 May 2013.                                      His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn, QC  

     

     

     

     

     

    Appellants’ Skeleton Argument for Mr Justice Morgan              BS416159

    (Late due to the Appellant waiting for the written rulings of his last applications before Cardiff County Court in time to appeal at Royal Courts of Justice and without it am unable to adequately comment on the Respondent’s skeleton argument with errors and huge assumptions)

    There are but three issues for His Lordship to consider,

    1)    the right for the Claimant to have the Defendant(s) give evidence in the light of the apparent criminal intent born out both in evidence and contained within the paragraphs of the Chief Constable’s 25th February 2009 sworn affidavit in another attempt to avoid disclosure of relevant evidence under his/her control since 1992 to date

    2)    the right for the Claimant  to have senior police officers, identified both before and during the trial, to give evidence or to be recalled, with or without witness statements, concerning their apparent course of conduct to both prejudice the Claimant’s health and his basic right to bring a claim for civil damages in the first place

    3)     for the Claimant or his legal representatives to only tape record evidence given on oath, under the strict supervision of the court and/or to be supplied with an audible copy of court proceedings as is allowed all over the world nowadays, including in England.

     Witnesses

    The Claimant’s right to call both a competent and compellable witness when, by law, a witness is ‘anybody’s property’ and especially, as in this case of these first three of nine Actions for damages against the South Wales Police, one Defendant, as the example, has been identified as signing her own 2009 affidavit (attached) knowing or ought to have known it to be riddled with lies and supports the Appellant’s argument that the Defendant has carried out a course of conduct tantamount to both unusual and extreme bullying with criminal intent.

    Analysis of 25th February 2009 Barbara Wilding Affidavit:

    18.   para 8.23

    Another traffic incident and a Barry court case was born out in evidence making her denial there ever was one another of her lies to bury the truth of a clear conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The lengths to which key players, mostly senior police officers, have been protected in these civil proceedings, is scandalous.

    19.   para 8.26 as per paragraph 13

    20.   para 8.13

    The incident when my Guernsey registered BMW motorcycle was stolen while her covert surveillance police were at the scene, my Barry veterinary Hospital, when the theft took place, makes her denial the police removed the number plate, on recovery, just one more of her lies.

    2nd Action

    23.   para  5.1

    The incident of her officers falsifying Barry magistrates evidence by trying to ‘frame me’ for someone else’s  speeding offence was proved in court with the subsequent arrest of the lawyer and seizure of the Crown Prosecution Service’s file makes her denial there ever was an incident or a court case one more of her lies.

    The fact that Dolmans, solicitors, admit CPS prosecutor, Stan Soffa, did not wish to be called as her defence witness beggars belief and anyway, who’s counting the incidents committed by the police?

    27. to 29   para 10.1

     First arrested for the theft of a car I had already reported as stolen, they having confiscated it and deliberately not told me where it was, just like with my Guernsey registered BMW motorcycle and Honda van, secondly, stopped for speeding and faulty exhaust and then, ten or so minutes later, stopped on some fabrication, to breathalyse, embarrassingly overlooked by the previous officers.

     

    3rd Action

    32.

    Her throw away comment of ‘antiquity’ being her excuse of failed disclosure is both insulting and typically arrogant. From 1993 onwards my English solicitors, me or my secretaries would follow up each incident with requests for either disclosure or to preserve their records.

     Adrian Oliver drafted her document being a party to the fanciful plan to prejudice these civil proceedings by arresting me for trading in machine guns, carrying a mandatory ten year prison term. Caswell Clinic convened my MAPPA level 3 hearings to have me further incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison but only using their rogue NHS (Wales) psychiatrist promised GMC protection for whatever he said in a Welsh court room.

    These following 22nd  and 23rd May13 Position Statements were subject to appeal to the High Court but have not been adjudicated upon in time, at the Cardiff County Court, for this 7th June 2013 Royal Courts of Justice Hearing

    That coupled with his Lordship’s Order suggesting that this Claimant  ‘may or may not be appealing earlier rulings’ over witnesses causes the court to be reminded that this hearing ought to be adjourned for all the reasons set out in the Appellant’s 28th May Application (attached at the bottom)

     

    22nd May 13 Claimant Position Statement

    1.      The Claimant asks His Honour to consider whether it is fitting that the Defendant be asked to more formally clarify their position on some points that at first may seem unrelated but have a common theme of legal argument around :-

    a.       Whether the Claimant should be allowed to amend any of his Claims ‘out of time’. 

    b.      Be allowed the issue of exemplary and/or aggravated damages to be considered.

    c.       Will the Defendants ever stop ‘actually harassing’ the Claimant as for example of in recent times by police using and sending to other police forces information to lead other police forces and other public sector departments to view the Claimant prejudicially by leading them to believe that the Claimant is delusional.

    d.      By the Defendant disseminating information to say the Claimant is delusional either that means what they say is untrue and the Defendant refuse to stop harassing the Claimant and may affect the level of damages

     

    e.       Or if what the Defendant disseminates is true then being delusional is a condition which allows the Claimant to be eligible to amend the Claims before the court that are ‘out of time’ by the time limitation period. 

    2.      The Claimant raises the issues from reading page 198 point 13.40 and related sections of A Practical Approach to Civil Procedure by Stuart Sime, twelfth edition (2009) that says that Judicial reasoning can be that Claims can usually be amended but that an amendment is treated as a new claim and cannot be brought out of time. However page 101 gives explanation on point 7.40 that a Claim (and therefore an amendment to a Claim) can be brought ‘out of time’ if the Claimant had a mental disability at the time the new Claim accrued.

    3.      As the Defendant, in recent years, persistently disseminates information about the Claimant, as being delusional, then that means the Claimant may apply to the Court to amend the Claims that accrued when he was delusional.

    4.      If the information, disseminated by the Defendant, is not true then that may be relevant exemplary and aggravated damages and even amount to defamation.

    5.      If the information that the Defendant disseminates about the Claimant, being delusional, is untrue then the Claimant asks that a statement is made as to when the Defendant will stop disseminating this untrue defamatory information and how it will go about achieving that as well as the Defendants withdrawing what they have sent to many other public bodies, including the Metropolitan Police, the Guernsey police, the French police and even government departments in the royal courts of Justice and Whitehall from around 2002 and onwards when applications were made that the Claimant be registered a Vexatious Litigant and as a MAPPA level 3 victim.

    6.      If, on the other hand, the information they disseminate about the Claimant is true then that requires the Defendant to say as from what date he is delusional or with a mental disability as the Claimant can be allowed by the Court to amend any claim that accrued from that date when he first had a mental disability.

    7.      As we are aware much by the Claimant is in writing and so if the Defendant gives detail as to the Claimant being delusional, for just one moment, then an independent expert can be used to trace back the detail from that moment identified by the Defendant to where the indication of delusional in writings first emerged.

    8.      A critical detail is that the Defendant actually disseminates information to say that the Claimant is delusional for ‘thinking he is harassed by police’.

    9.      The Claimant complains to police, at least, as from 20th June 1993, when the Claimant was in unlawful custody, up an including to today’s Position Statement 

    10.   Given the Defendant disseminates information that the Claimant is delusional, for thinking he is harassed by police, please would the Defendant clarify at what point the Claimant was first displaying being delusional, by complaining he was harassed by police, so that the Claimant can apply to amend his Claims that accrued on or after that date.

    11.  If the Claimant was not delusional about being harassed by police, yet wrote and complained that he was harassed by police from say, 20th June 1993, following information given to the Defendant by the Guernsey Police, at what point will the Defendant ensure the Claimant is no longer harassed by police, such as the Defendant stopping disseminating false and malicious information about the Claimant and will the Defendant comment on the obvious reluctance of the Defendant to stop harassing the Claimant in the context of exemplary and/or aggravated damages

    A)      Witnesses outstanding in 1-3 Actions

    1.       Ex Inspector Colliandris  (medical argument irrelevant)

    2.       Ex Chief Inspector Sean (Shawn) Trigg  (key player)

    3.       Ex Brian Jenner  (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

    4.        Ex Chief Inspector Insp Robert Nelson Roe (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

    5.        Ex Chief Inspector Collin Jones  (key player)

    6.        Inspector Andrew Rice (Recall re 1st Action 8.23 & CP Ebbs/Alexander)

    7.        Inspector Steve Parry  (Penal order on Defendant)

    8.        Jonathan Clayton Air Traffic Controller (Dangerous flying/Penal Order)

    9.        Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding (Defendant)

    10.      Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian (Penal Order on Defendant)

    11.      Ex Special Constable Ridley (Penal Order on Defendant)

    12.       Mrs Diana Graham (Foreign Witness Summons)

    13.       A Gafael  (re break-in Cardiff Vet surgery/Penal Order)

    14.       G Thomas (stolen BMW m/c/ Penal order)

    15.       ‘Yosser’ Nigel Thomas (stolen BMW m/c)

    16.       Michael  Murphy (Defendant’s destruction of Claimant’s vehicles)

    17.       Mrs K Kirk

    18.       Mrs G Jones

    19.      Mrs J Hanson

    B)       Application for Jury Trials for:

    a)     4th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

    b)    5th Action Machine gun Case/malicious pros, false imprisonments

    c)     6th Action Forensic Psychiatrist/NHS (Wales) False Medical Records

               d)     7th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

          e)     8th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments 

    C)    Claimant’s Fitness to Continue?

    D)   Previous ‘struck out’ incidents in 1-3 Actions to be re instated

    E)     Current Civil Proceedings (post Woolf/ Human Rights Act) 

    F)  HM Crown Prosecution Service continues to ignore disclosure applications from Claimant, his solicitor or from his barrister re:

                  i) Refusal to disclose evidence to clarify NHS psychiatric records at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend

                 ii)  Refusal to disclose July 2012 evidence re doctor's statement that caused Claimant imprisoned          

                iii) Refusal to disclose depositions re above withdrawn indictment of 'harassment'

                iv) Refusal to disclose depositions re one Lewis machine gun indictment and subsequent acquittal

                 v) Refusal to supply Claimant with copy of his own MG11 victim statement re above outstanding issues

                vi) Refusal to supply Claimant with date he was first deemed to have a mental disability

    G)     Interim payment for costs and damage

    Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                                                  22nd May 2013

     

    (23rd May 13 Position Statement mislaid and to follow)

     

    Private Tape Recording, ‘Litigants in Person’ to be awarded legal costs and the Crushing of Family Court Cartels

    The future of our UK court administration, if not already a night mare, is a pretty grim one right now with the lack of funding for expertise and the extra work caused by the withdrawal of legal aid.

     One’s inability to find a truly independent lawyer these days with ever mounting unexplained costs incurred, should you be so lucky, is why this Claimant is adding to the problem by having to act alone.

    Also, if this Claimant’s current Cardiff court action is typical of a ‘litigant in person’ floundering around in a quagmire of both regulation and custom with fast aging faculties barely keeping his head above water, then what is the future of our law courts when many more are forced to do the same?

    In order for ‘litigants in person’ to achieve anything from the clear futility of it all then to further break down lucrative and unfair cartels, as currently practiced in the UK courts, is what each must strive to do and share any information from one’s mistakes.

    This Claimant suggests we remain vigilant in what is to be ultimately achieved, the significant reform of a grossly outdated money driven judiciary and not to allow our own court cases to over shadow this primary objective, the clinching of that man made concept, some call ‘justice’ for all parties.

    In The High Court Royal Courts of Justice                                                     BS614159                                                                                                                                                                                         

    Before Mr Justice Morgan

     

    Maurice Kirk v Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

    Appellant’s Application to Adjourn of 7th June 13 High Court Hearing

    Further to the 14th May 2013 High Court Order of the Honourable Mr Justice Morgan the Appellant applies for an appropriate adjournment in order to:

    12.  Obtain the official transcript as he was unable to tape record for his own use within the case in preparation for subsequent appeal(s)

    13.  obtain clarification as to which of the outstanding witnesses, identified in his 22nd and 23rd May 13 Position Statements to the Crown Court judge and

    14.   in the light of the enclosed further statement of A G Gafael and The Defendant’s February 2009 sworn Affidavit and

    15.   concerning the proposed 28th May 13 ruling , by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, due to be handed down today and

    16.  For appellant to obtain fee exemption in order to complete his prosecution and subsequent appeal(s)

    AND

    17.  The Appellant asks the court to consider whether it is fitting that the Defendant be asked to more formally clarify their position on some points that at first may seem unrelated but have a common theme of legal argument around :-

     

    f.        Whether the Appellant should be allowed to amend any of his Claims ‘out of time’. 

    g.       Be allowed the issue of exemplary and/or aggravated damages to be considered.

    h.       Will the Defendants ever stop ‘actually harassing’ the Appellant as for example of in recent times by police using and sending to other police forces information to lead other police forces and other public sector departments to view the Appellant prejudicially by leading them to believe that the Appellant is delusional.

     

    i.         By the Defendant disseminating information to say the Appellant is delusional either that means what they say is untrue and the Defendant refuse to stop harassing the Appellant and may affect the level of damages

    j.        Or if what the Defendant disseminates is true then being delusional is a condition which allows the Appellant to be eligible to amend the Claims before the court that are ‘out of time’ by the time limitation period.

    18.  The Appellant raises the issues from reading page 198 point 13.40 and related sections of A Practical Approach to Civil Procedure by Stuart Sime, twelfth edition (2009) that says that Judicial reasoning can be that Claims can usually be amended but that an amendment is treated as a new claim and cannot be brought out of time. However page 101 gives explanation on point 7.40 that a Claim (and therefore an amendment to a Claim) can be brought ‘out of time’ if The Appellant had a mental disability at the time the new Claim accrued.

    19.  As the Defendant, in recent years, persistently disseminates information about the Appellant, as being delusional, then that means the Appellant may apply to the Court to amend the Claims that accrued when he was delusional.

    20.  If the information, disseminated by the Defendant, is not true then that may be relevant exemplary and aggravated damages and even amount to defamation.

     

    21.  If the information that the Defendant disseminates about the Appellant, being delusional, is untrue then the Appellant asks that a statement is made as to when the Defendant will stop disseminating this untrue defamatory information and how it will go about achieving that as well as the Defendants withdrawing what they have sent to many other public bodies, including the Metropolitan Police, the Guernsey police, the French police and even government departments in the royal courts of Justice and Whitehall from around 2002 and onwards when applications were made that the Appellant be registered a Vexatious Litigant and as a MAPPA level 3 victim.

    22.  If, on the other hand, the information they disseminate about the Appellant is true then that requires the Defendant to say as from what date he is delusional or with a mental disability as the Appellant can be allowed by the Court to amend any claim that accrued from that date when he first had a mental disability.

    23.  As we are aware much by the Claimant is in writing and so if the Defendant gives detail as to the Appellant being delusional, for just one moment, then an independent expert can be used to trace back the detail from that moment identified by the Defendant to where the indication of delusional in writings first emerged.

    24.  A critical detail is that the Defendant actually disseminates information to say that the appellant is delusional for ‘thinking he is harassed by police’.

    25.  The Appellant complains to police, at least, as from 20th June 1993, when the appellant was in unlawful custody, up an including to today’s Position Statement.

    26.   Given the Defendant disseminates information that the Appellant is delusional, for thinking he is harassed by police, please would the Defendant clarify at what point the Appellant was first displaying being delusional, by complaining he was harassed by police, so that the Appellant can apply to amend his Claims that accrued on or after that date.

    27.  If the Appellant was not delusional about being harassed by police, yet wrote and complained that he was harassed by police from say, 20th June 1993, following information given to the Defendant by the Guernsey Police, at what point will the Defendant ensure the appellant is no longer harassed by police, such as the Defendant stopping disseminating false and malicious information about the Appellant and will the Defendant comment on the obvious reluctance of the Defendant to stop harassing the Appellant in the context of exemplary and/or aggravated damages

     

     

    A)      Witnesses outstanding in 1-3 Action 

    1.       Ex Inspector Colliandris  (medical argument irrelevant)

    2.       Ex Chief Inspector Sean (Shawn) Trigg  (key player)

    3.       Ex Brian Jenner  (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

    4.        Ex Chief Inspector Insp Robert Nelson Roe (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

    5.        Ex Chief Inspector Collin Jones  (key player)

    6.        Inspector Andrew Rice (Recall re 1st Action 8.23 & CP Ebbs/Alexander)

    7.        Inspector Steve Parry  (Penal order on Defendant)

    8.        Jonathan Clayton Air Traffic Controller (Dangerous flying/Penal Order)

    9.        Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding (Defendant)

    10.      Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian (Penal Order on Defendant)

    11.      Ex Special Constable Ridley (Penal Order on Defendant)

    12.       Mrs Diana Graham (Foreign Witness Summons)

    13.       A Gafael  (re break-in Cardiff Vet surgery/Penal Order)

    14.       G Thomas (stolen BMW m/c/ Penal order)

    15.       ‘Yosser’ Nigel Thomas (stolen BMW m/c)

    16.       Michael  Murphy (Defendant’s destruction of Claimant’s vehicles)

    19.      Mrs J Hanson

     

    B)     Application for Jury Trials for:

    a)     4th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

    b)    5th Action Machine gun Case/malicious pros, false imprisonments

    c)     6th Action Forensic Psychiatrist/NHS (Wales) incorrect Medical Records

         d)     7th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

          e)     8th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments 

    C)    Claimant’s Fitness to Continue?

    D)   Previous ‘struck out’ incidents in 1-3 Actions to be re instated

    E)     Current Civil Proceedings (post Woolf/ Human Rights Act) 

    F)  HM Crown Prosecution Service continues to ignore disclosure applications from Claimant, his solicitor or from his barrister re:

                  i) Refusal to disclose evidence to clarify NHS psychiatric records at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend

                 ii)  Refusal to disclose July 2012 evidence re doctor's statement that caused Claimant imprisoned          

                iii) Refusal to disclose depositions re above withdrawn indictment of 'harassment'

                iv) Refusal to disclose depositions re one Lewis machine gun indictment and subsequent acquittal

                 v) Refusal to supply Claimant with copy of his own MG11 victim statement re above outstanding issues

                vi) Refusal to supply Claimant with date he was first deemed to have a mental disability

    G)     Interim payment for costs and damage

     

    Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                                                28th May 2013

                              

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    PILOT MAGAZINE....previous pages at bottom of previous blogs

     

    Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (4).pdf

  • 7th June 2013 Royal Courts of Justice Application to Appeal re Tape-Recording in UK Law Courts

    SUMMARY OF 20 YEAR RUNNING SCANDAL in just short documents for the new reader:

    A Dolmans fabricated affidavit following His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC's Order re 'disclosure' of numerous police incidents they were trying to bury

     

    FAO Dolmans, Solicitors

    Dear Mr Adrian Oliver, 

    31st May 2013
     
    Please find enclosed 23rd April 2009 worker's statement
     
    Research uncovers photos already with court handed in with my Abuse Application of 8th Sept 2008 that sparked off the falsified Chief Constable 25th Feb 2009 affidavit,  her notice to quit and her personal attempt to having me shot by having me registered MAPPA level 3 and not telling me about it

    09 02 25 Chief Constable Barbara Wilding Affidavit.pdf

    09 04 23 Worker Witness Statement.pdf

    13 05 27 Misfeasance Application BS 614159 CF101 741 CF204 141.pdf  

    13 05 28 997435 Respondent's Skeleton Argument.pdf

    13 05 27 Anthony Gafael Witnessed Statement for the Trial Judge BS416159.pdf

    13 05 28 adjournment appl High Court BS 614159.doc

    Private Tape Recording, ‘Litigants in Person’ to be awarded legal costs and the Crushing of Family Court Cartels

    The future of our UK court administration, if not already a night mare, is a pretty grim one right now with the lack of funding for expertise and the extra work caused by the withdrawal of legal aid.

     One’s inability to find a truly independent lawyer these days with ever mounting unexplained costs incurred, should you be so lucky, is why I am adding to the problem by having to act alone.

    Also, if my current Cardiff court action is typical of a ‘litigant in person’ floundering around in a quagmire of both regulation and custom with fast aging faculties barely keeping his head above water, then what is the future of our law courts when many more are forced to do the same?

    In order for ‘litigants in person’ to achieve anything from the clear futility of it all then to further break down lucrative and unfair cartels, as currently practised in UK courts, is what each of you must strive to do and share the information from your mistakes.

     May I suggest we remain vigilant in what is to be ultimately achieved, significant reform of grossly outdated money driven judiciary and not to allow our own court cases to over shadow this primary objective, the clinching of that man made concept, justice for all parties.

    Private Tape Recording in Court

    1.  This to be supervised by the court only

    2.  Your recorder  be placed with the clerk of the court who will only record evidence on oath

    3.  As to its use then it is for the presiding judge to so order where appropriate

    The main danger and need for current legislation in banning the indiscriminate tape recording of court proceedings, from the public gallery for example, is because other private conversations may be picked up when so often it is privileged.

    If my current Cardiff  court action is typical of a ‘litigant in person’, floundering around in a quagmire of both regulation and custom with fast aging faculties barely keeping my head above water, then what is the future of our courts when many more are forced to act alone?

     My appeal, re private tape recording, is listed for 7th June 2013 in the Royal Courts of Justice if I do not withdraw from it following the apparent black mail move by Mr Justice Morgan, again, in ordering the South Wales Police to attend to further try in having me made bankrupt .

    What has them worried is the fact that Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police is yet to give evidence in the three month running trial , in Cardiff, as was she, with a few other ring leaders, who used the public purse (misfeasance) to feather their own nests and carry out Guernsey's  wishes .

    Here are some of my documents for RCJ (To be added in next few days):

    1. Application for the 'Defendant' to give her evidence in part heard trial

    13 05 Tape & Def WitRCJ Applic.pdf

     13 04 18 barrister cont note re Tape Appl.pdf

    13 05 14 Morgan J RCJ Order.pdf

    2. Her false February 2009 sworn affidavit denying knowledge of police breaking into my Cardiff surgery and numerous court cases relating to my 10 years of covert police surveillance of my veterinary clients and practice buildings

    3. The right to tape record, properly supervised, of evidence given on oath only. 

     

    NORMAN SCARTH RN Rtd

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNPCDq8eqRs

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=CTexJgo1Zf8&NR=1

    TAPE Judgment.pdf

     

    The tapes, all in my possession and requested to be played, on 7th June  at RCJ, include cross examination of retired  Ex Inspector Robert Nelson Roe (recalled back to court by judge as he had previously denied even knowing me), Cardiff barrister David Gareth Evans ,CPS in my 1st Dec 2011 Harassment/breach of restraining order imprisonments, perverting the course of justice and Royal Courts of Justice hearing before Lord Moses over deceitfully written psychiatric reports for Barbara Wilding just to have me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act to be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Hospital for life.

    95 07 22 Sgt Roe St.pdf 

    13 05 22 A G Gafael Court Order.pdf

    My bizarre experiences surrounding my acquisition of this following few statements would need a week of work in order to putting it into plausible print!

    13 05 27 Anthony Gafael Witnessed Statement for the Trial Judge BS416159.pdf

    13 04 08 CAA NATS Jonathan Clayton Evidence Blocked.pdf

    These and other tapes, some stored for nearly twenty years, may be published on this web site subject to the RCJ ruling and, if needed, final European Court of Human Rights ruling because, as for now, His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC's Order not to disseminate, stands.

     

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo

    http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Why-Two-World-Wars_3F00_.aspx

     

    3rd published page of my continuing Pilot Magazine  seven page article written after my little 'jolly' to Sydney Harbour 

    13 05 27 TAPE blog Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (3).pdf

     

    AND as for Family court lawyer cartels take the Musa Nigerian family case, and 'snatched seven children, just as a day to day example,  with the Haringey Council wickedly shielded by 'HM' so their string of solicitors and barristers could milk the proverbial tax payer funded 'gravy train' without even fear of any taxation of their extortionate make believe bill of costs.

     

    http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/crime/remove-children-from-criminal-families-says-sheffield-judge-1-5708134

    ‘Remove children from criminal families’, says Sheffield judge

    Top judge Alan Goldsack QC who is retiring at the end of May pictured in his chambers at Sheffield Crown Court 21 May 2013 Image Paul David Drabble www.pauldaviddrabble.co.uk

    Published on the 25 May 2013 17:06

    South Yorkshire’s top judge has called for children to be removed from dysfunctional homes to end the ‘frightening’ cycle of crime.

    Judge Alan Goldsack QC, Recorder of Sheffield, revealed he is now dealing with the grandchildren of criminals he prosecuted or defended 40 years ago.

    The judge spoke out as he retired after 43 years in the legal profession.

    He said: “Some people become criminals because they enjoy crime and think it’s a good way of life and if they don’t get caught they think they can have a good lifestyle.

    “But a frightening thing is the number of people I see who are the grandchildren of the people I have prosecuted and defended 40 years ago – because crime runs in families in the same way that being a doctor, teacher or lawyer does.

    “We have to get in on the ground and remove young babies from the families that are going to produce the next generation of criminals, and that is why I did family law right up until the end because I think it is very important work.

    “I have read so many pre-sentence reports where I said to myself ‘why was this person not adopted at birth? All the signs were there’.”

    Judge Goldsack said prisons are full of criminals who are products of a failing care system, where children are removed from dysfunctional homes too late – at an age when it is difficult to find adoptive parents so the youngsters end up in care.

    “A huge proportion of people that we see at court are products of the so called care system and a huge proportion of those in prison are a product of that so called care system,” the judge added.

    “Family is all important if you want to prevent people becoming criminals - a stable family life prevents most people from becoming criminals.

    “The care system is not working as well as it should be by a long chalk.

    ”Once children get beyond the age of four or five, what do you do if you bring that child into the care system?

    “There is a shortage of parents wanting to adopt children of that age or above, so only few will be found homes, and if you a child you leave until they are nine or 10 the care system can’t do much for them at all - they can up going back home because there is nowhere else to put them.

    “Children removed from home at 11 or 12 will invariably end up in a children’s home, which is why we have to get in early.

    “It’s not uncommon for a dysfunctional family to have £250,000 spent on them, but if we got in early and removed children from these homes we could save thousands.”

    [tks to M.B.]

  • Miscarriage of Chief Inspector's Grandchild Sparks 20 Year Vendetta against Veterinary Surgeon

    Arrest of Crown Prosecutor David Gareth Evans

    Dear Mr. Kirk,

    I have pleasure in confirming that, further to telephone and written correspondence, Mr. Tony Dicken of CPS Cardiff agreed to make available a number of CPS files involving Dr. +++++++++( one complaint was subject to a no further action decision). These were to be provided in time for your renewed application for leave to appeal conviction for breach of a restraining order also involving Dr. ++++++++.
     
    The arrangement was that these files could be delivered to the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre.
     
    Since our meeting last Sunday I have telephoned CPS Cardiff on your behalf about this disclosure but have been met with no answer.
    I trust this assists.

    David Leathley L.L.B.; of Lincoln's Inn. Barrister.
     
    And so it goes on, here in South Wales, in my third decade, now, of witnessing the stench that pervades our society from the acts of either police or CPS continuing to distort, fabricate and generally withhold evidence so necessary for  either our civil or criminal courts.

    Western Mail 4th August 1993.pdf

     13 05 22 Claimant Harassment Victim Application.doc

    Hearing at Cardiff Magistrates 25th June 13 (bring a packed lunch) Doc2.docx

     

    A private persons arrest was conducted in Cardiff County Court foyer

     Private Prosecution.wmv

    Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder[1] in which the individual is described as being excessively preoccupied with issues of personal adequacy, power, prestige and vanity. This condition affects one percent of the population.[2][3] First formulated in 1968, it was historically called megalomania, and is severe egocentrism.

    The current formulation of Narcissistic personality disorder in the diagnostic manual DSM-IV has been criticised for failing to describe the range and complexity of the disorder; it focuses overly on "the narcissistic individual's external, symptomatic, or social interpersonal patterns--at the expense of his or her internal complexity and individual suffering" which has reduced its clinical utility 

    Well?

    Then may I suggest you examine the next document that, if true, might have caused it?

     Guernsey Police collaboration with South Wales Police was FIRST PROVED by me on 3rd Dec 1992 when I was interrogated by the Commander of Barry police station, a Chief Superintendent no less,  when accused of arson, burning out my Piper Cub, for the insurance (it was not even insured).

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=3

     

     09 02 25 Chief Constable Barbara Wilding Affidavit RCJ Applic.doc

     

    Rough draft for Friday's applications before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

    22nd May 2013

    Claimant’s Position Statement

     

    A)   Witnesses outstanding in 1-3 Actions

    1.      Ex Inspector Colliandris  (medical argument irrelevant)

    2.      Ex Chief Inspector Sean (Shawn) Trigg  (key player)

    3.      Ex Brian Jenner  (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

    4.      Ex Chief Inspector Insp Robert Nelson Roe (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

    5.      Ex Chief Inspector Collin Jones  (key player)

    6.      Inspector Andrew Rice (Recall re 1st Action 8.23 & CP Ebbs/Alexander)

    7.      Inspector Steve Parry  (Penal order on Defendant)

    8.        Jonathan Clayton Air Traffic Controller (Dangerous flying/Penal Order)

    9.           Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding  (Defendant)

    10.          Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian (Penal Order on Defendant)

    11.          Ex Special Constable Ridley (Penal Order on Defendant)

    12.       Mrs Diana Graham (Foreign Witness Summons)

    13.         A Gafael  (re break in Cardiff Vet surgery/Penal Order)

    14.        G Thomas (stolen BMW m/c/ Penal order)

    15.        ‘Yosser’ Nigel Thomas (stolen BMW m/c)

    16.           Michael  Murphy (Defendant’s destruction of Claimant’s vehicles)

    17.       Mrs K Kirk

    18.       Mrs G Jones

    19.      Mrs J Hanson 

    B)     Application for Jury Trials for:

    a)     4th Action  police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

    b)    5th Action  Machine gun Case/malicious pros, false imprisonments

    c)     6th Action  Forensic Psychiatrist/NHS (Wales)False Medical Records

               d)     7th Action  police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

          e)     8th Action  police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments 

    C)    Claimant’s Fitness to Continue?

    D)   Previous ‘struck out’ incidents in 1-3 Actions to be re instated

    E)     Current Civil Proceedings (post Woolf/ Human Rights Act)

     

    F)  HM Crown Prosecution Service continues to ignore disclosure applications from Claimant, his solicitor or from his  barrister re:

     

                  i) Refusal to disclose evidence to clarify NHS psychiatric records at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend

                 ii)  Refusal to disclose July 2012 evidence re doctor's statement that caused Claimant imprisoned          

                iii) Refusal to disclose depositions re above withdrawn indictment of 'harassment'

                iv) Refusal to disclose depositions re one Lewis machine gun indictment and subsequent acquittal

                 v) Refusal to supply Claimant with copy of his own MG11 victim statement re above outstanding issues

                vi) Refusal to supply Claimant with date he was first deemed to have a mental disability

     

    G)     Interim payment for costs and damage

     

    A sample of Re examination Evidence

     13 05 20 Re ex of Clnt BS 614159.pdf

     

    Pilot Mag Apr 2002 Profile Pt 2_0001.pdf

    09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans.pdf

     09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

     

     
    [Extract from my 15th May 13 e-mail to Inspector Grothier of South Wales Police Professional standards Dept. HQ. Bridgend]
     

    Inspector Andrew Rice of South Wales Police 

     

     Mr Ebbs/Alexander gives evidence in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre today, 15th May 2013 at around 10.30 and as both you and your vast legal team very well know you should be there to witness the evidence and read his statement by your QC as 'non controversial' 12 10 26 Ebbs Statement.pdf 

     

    You need, may I suggest, to be talking with the trial judge and/or clerk of the court as to timing but, in the interests of so called 'justice' and the Rule of Law,bring a few friends.

    (After a good lunch with Andy Aishe, all paid for by Mr Alexander, they both gave evidence)

     

     

    Air traffic controller, Jonathan Clayton (JC)  and Inspector Steve Parry, both vital eye witnesses, have both been 'spirited away for a few weeks by the police, until the case is over. Despite witness summonses served they currently, as for those below, enjoy the protection of the 'Taffia'.

    A very frightening experience"

    Andy Aishe, my pilot in 'Liberty Girl' whilst my licence was temporarily suspended, told the court, that the helicopter followed us from Wenvoe mast to St Donats (15minutes) 

     

     "A very frightening experience",  "helicopter rotors might chop the wing off"

     

    JC had let it slip, after I had loosened his tongue a little one day, in the Six Bells, that the video the two police were making from the police helicopter was record as just how dangerously close they were to us as they all could read the writing on my t shirt, I'd rather be flying G-KIRK!

     

    13 05 12 Gafael st.pdf (Mr Anthony G Gafael has been summoned by special court order to give evidence this Friday at 10am)

     

    On 24th May at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre there will be an application for the production of :

     

    Barbara Wilding, ex Chief Constable, ex Inspector Howard Davies, ex  Chief inspector Brian Jenner, ex Inspector Robert Nelson Roe, ex Inspector Sean Trigg and serving Inspectors, Steve Parry and Andrew Rice and Sgt Kilberg, all for being implicated in bullying, misfeasance, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments and having my vehicles destroyed or stolen and setting up a Penarth police station car park 'sting'.

     

    10 09 28 Murphy Statement_0001.pdf

    13 05 14 D Insurance st.pdf

    13 05 04 Receptionis st.pdf

    IWitness Statement Kevin Fairman.docx

     

    1. The police watch my BMW motor bike being stolen, Ex police officer Booker from Llantwit Major, slipping it out on cross examination.

    2. Gerald Thomas (Gerry) I meet on the Cardiff prison exercise yard, while I am in for 'trading machine guns'  and who tells me how he heard the theft going on at the back of the Barry veterinary Hospital. He heard it on his illegal police scanner radio.

    3. He hears it has crashed not a few hundred yards from where he lives and so nips down to watch the police arriving and the rider running away.

    4. Gerry notices 'a foreign number plate' on it actually being 'all numbers'----Guernsey.

    5. The police wait until the garage truck arrives to recover the bike.

    6.  BUT by the time he gets to the incident with police still in attendance no number plate is on the bike!

    7.  So back at his garage he has to remove the bike panelling to locate the chassis number, rings it in to the Barry police station in order that the 'owner' can be traced.

    8. six weeks later 'Yosser' Nigel Hughes, a BMW rider in the police force, comes into my hospital with a rescued, off the M4, young Rottweiler which he hopes to keep. A 'conversation takes place' that causes Mr C at the garage, another client, to return my bike.

     

    The following photo is of his original record book to confirm , which he did in court, the police only needed it chassis number to audit trail its route of owner ship. Oh, surprise,  surprise, I had bought it off a Guernsey police officer, a Mr Farnham son of someone 'in music'. 

     

    But the Ely police, only a few months earlier, had me jailed in Cardiff prison for stealing my own bike and being unable to serve a summonses as they neither knew who I was nor where I lived.

     

     

     

    Note the details re contacting Barry police station (in red) and chassis numbered with name of owner put in six weeks later.

     

     Out of 50 other such pages, of years of 'recoveries' in this book, no over incident is so recorded. It stinks, Dad, doesn't it?

     

     

     

     The 'Officer In the Case' (OIC), while I was locked up in a cell until prison next day, rang Guernsey police, from Fairwater police station, giving them my name which caused, the court heard, an immediate reply, "he always goes to court as Claus Barbe"

     

     

    .

     Theft Just one of the 31 incidents in his hearing in four other actions  lodged and similarly delayed waiting to be listed for trial, NHS(Wales) Caswell Clinic and a certain 'W11 Lewis machine gun' case that will be a lot more fun to manage  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=4

     

    Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

     

     

    And now something completely different!

     

     MAD, BAD and DANGEROUS to KNOW

    PILOT MAGAZINE article will be featured, per page, in following blogs starting with the first page, I suppose. Material for it was sort of acquired by a very old friend, the then editor, Philip Whiteman, whilst we enjoyed the occasional few bottles of very fine claret. 

     

     

     

    Pilot Mag April 2002 page 1.pdf

    Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (2).pdf

     

    Some chap signing out his name 'Phillip something....... on some new fangled community type internet  talking system, far too complicated for me to understand......now, if I remember it, was it not a Philip something for some pilot magazine, at Biggin Hill that foggy day, in 2002, when 51 aircraft suddenly  started up their engines all at once, in inclement weather, all, apparently,pointing at the 'coat hanger' in some penal colony.... and I do not even have a route sorted!

     

    One guy had been loading a large suitcase into his twin and when asked he opened it . the leather case was fulI to the brim with aviation charts/ topographical maps and all weighing a ton!

     

     I had dug out  my old school atlas,(my nav aid to winning a bet), earlier that week with enough Empire on it for plenty of fuel stops and repairs as Amy had the use of. The old atlas would  allow me to fly between the pink bits so I didn't get lost.

     

    Of course, I remember now, it was Philip that rummaged around on the floor of the clogged up cockpit, with aircraft now taxying by for the active runway (pointing the wrong way fro Australia). Amongst much rubbish he found and un ruffled a sort of map to meticulously calculate a bearing and much DR to, at least, to the English Channel and, anyway, I didn't need a map of France for Nice, I'd been there before.  

     

    So much for one more page of your article, Phillip, you do not the recall all my stories , that night, as another special landing strip, of same name, reaches territorial waters tonight , needing a wee cub landing for a proper 'send off'!

     

    It was 6am in Plymouth Sound, circa 1979, another 'flat top' for the scrap yard (with HUGE History) , a Fastnet or was it the smallest 6.8 vessel to cross the pond, I forget, I used to be paid, vin those heady days,  for photos for Fleet Street.

     

    BUT much problems with 'she who has to be obeyed' ,  the CAA , a pending action, so unusual, stopping me from landing on the ARK ROYAL that early grey morning. My children, never miss .....the opportunity in life, it only comes once , I know, I was that soldier.

     

    Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (3).pdf

     

     

     

     CONTACT DETAILS:    maurice@kirkflyingvet.com  &  tel 07907937953

     

     
    Leave an appropriate comment?
More Posts Previous page - Next page