Senior police officers and ring leaders continue to enjoy protection by a UK law court while I plough on through my evidence into the 2nd day in the witness box
IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY
COURT BS 614159-MC65
CF101741 .
CF204141
BETWEEN:
MAURICE
JOHN KIRK
Claimant
and
THE
CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES POLICE
Defendant
CLAIMANT APPLICATION
7th May 2013
Further to His
Honours Ruling
I, Maurice John Kirk, of 175 Cowbridge Road West, Cardiff, confirm
that the content of this, my statement, is true to the best of my belief and
say as follows:
(Claimant’s request
for summons to be served while the Defendant needed none of it)
1.
Mrs D Hutchinson
has written two statements and they are with the court
2.
Mr John Francis Clode has written one
statement and it is with the court
3 Gerald
Thomas of Barry has written one statement and it is with the court
4.
Jonathan
Clayton c/o Air Traffic control, Cardiff Airport has told the Claimant,
with slurred clarity, more than once, that he and others in the Cardiff Airport
control tower had expressed amazement on seeing the 4th July 1999
video taken from the police helicopter of Piper Cub, registration G-KIRK, having
been so close as to being able to read on the Claimant’s t-shirt the words, ‘I
would rather be flying ‘G-KIRK’.
Mr Clayton will explain that Mr Aishe, the
purported ‘pilot in command’ and possibly
under instruction from some ‘back seat driver’, may have in advertently ‘booked
in’ the Claimant’s aircraft, while paying the Cheltenham/Gloucester air field landing
fee, under the name of the registered owner, a ‘Mr Maurice Kirk’.
Mr Clayton may be able to confirm whether
Mr Aishe’s actions were deliberate or not and whether he was, in fact, in
command whilst flying from the front seat of a US J3L4 1944 D-Day landing
aircraft.
Mr Clayton should remember that the Claimant
was first contacted by radio from Cardiff AirTraffic (ATC) despite having heard nothing from G-KIRK but warning
the Claimant, then just east of Newport at around 500 ft, that there was a ‘bear
in the air’ in the Wenvoe area or by some similarly coded message.
The
Cardiff radio transmission was only instigated because police from the
Gloucester based helicopter telephoned Cardiff police as they believed or ‘wished
to believe’ that the Claimant was ‘pilot in command’ and flying without a valid
pilot’s licence.
5.
Andrew Aishe has written two statements of which at least
one is with the court.
6.
Stan Stoffa c/o CPS Capital Tower Cardiff refuses to write a statement and was
prosecutor in more than one of the incidents in these three Actions and will
confirm Inspector Rice burst into the magistrates court in May 1995 with
numerous officers and seized the Crown Prosecutor’s file following my request
evidence be preserved for a criminal investigation
7.
Kirstie Kirk of Marlpits , the Claimant’s one
time family home, has written numerous statements and are with the court.
8.
Ex police officer, biker, ‘Yosser’ Nigel Hughes
c/o Central Police Station Cardiff appears to be hiding from giving evidence but
would confirm he tipped me off, whilst the Claimant was examining a motorway
dumped young Rottweiler on his consulting room table, as to where the police
had hidden the Claimant’s BMW stolen motor bike.
He would probably assist in explaining why
there was a six week delay without informing the Claimant over such a
notoriously known motor bike having been, so recently, in such a high speed
chase across the Vale to almost Bridgend and ‘getting away ‘from the Cardiff
police, the same that in May, that year, the other motor cycles and cars stolen in Barry
from the claimant with little or no evidence of the Barry police lifting one
finger to assist the Claimant in recovering them or prosecuting the culprits
when many were known to the police, the Defendant in this case.
9.
Ex PC 2742 Ridley c/o Central Police Station
Cardiff has made copious contemporaneous notes of these incidents primarily
being involved with covert surveillance of the Claimant’s property and vehicles
with his name on R Hirst’s 1st Feb 1996 statement contained in
Claimant’s originally proposed witness bundle.
10..
The ‘yellow witness bundle’ that, on 18th
June 2009, was under the Claimant’s arm while armed police, sporting both cute tin
hats and stun grenades whilst brandishing machine guns, were surrounding him while he quietly waited
outside the Chief Constable’s office door.
11.
Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian c/o Central
Police Station , Cardiff, another covert police officer, to spy on the Claimant,
has made an MG11 s9 statement re Claimant ‘stop’ in Llantwit Street, Barry
(green file page 30) and gave evidence in Barry magistrates before the case
against the Claimant collapsed following yet another allegation of driving
without valid insurance.
Frank O’Brian is particularly important as
a witness to show the extent ‘extreme’ and ‘unusual’ unlawful conduct was
regularly occasioned, ‘evidence of similar fact’, to ‘eventually get the ***’.
12.
Detective Inspector Steve Parry c/o Central
Police Station, Cardiff ‘put about’ or did not ’put about’ the rumour the
Claimant took ‘high alcohol ‘ mouth wash in order to obtain a positive mouth
wash. This was elicited by Bridgend custody officer, Evans, following the
Claimant receiving yet another positive breath test on the road side and zero, less
than an hour later, on the definitive test whilst in custody.
13.
It is the Claimant’s submission the story is just
another police lie following His Honour Judge Jacob’s ‘comments’ following yet
another failed but expensive prosecution in the Cardiff Crown Court..... the Claimant
being accused of ‘driving through a red light’ and having a positive breath
test but a zero reading in around 20 minutes after, back at Barry police station.
14.
Jill Jones Newlands Road Barry witnessed incidents
of threats and damage done to the Claimant and his property and of surgery break
ins with police conducting perfunctory investigations.
15.
Mrs Hanson was a neighbour to the Claimant’s Tynewydd
road house and so witnessed claimant’s numerous complaint featured in the 1st
Action.
16.
I forget who else I have attempted, so far, to
call as witnesses or who currently feature in my last week’s appeal now lodged
in the High Court from an earlier refusal. To have any prosecution witnesses at
all appears to be a privilege while the Defendant(s ), past and present Chief Constables
and other senior officer ring leaders continue to enjoy remains immunity to examination
and , therefore ridicule needing a jail term...a complete nonsense and it stinks, does it not?
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
7th May 2013
Other Court Cases about to 'hit the proverbial fan' if ever I find a lawyer to get on with it!
1. One million pound damages claim against NHS' Caswell clinic for falsifying psychiatric records just because a doctor was being black mailed by the police over some floosy he went on to mary if rumour is correct
2. One million pound damages claim against South Wales Police for malicious prosecution over some WW1 antique decommissioned machine gun painted , incidentally , a different ccolour, in order to try and fool the jury
3. the remaining three other Claims of malicious prosecutions and false imprisonment by the south Wales Police
4. Two more, yet to be drafted, if and when I can ever find a lawyer to do it!
A copy of a letter, only written this morning, to a pretty divorce lawyer, rather relevant at the moment in the general scheme of things yet to come
Dear Ms T
Apologies but I am as much in the dark as you.
I employed solicitor and counsel for what reason I now cannot forget but repeated attempts since, to settle this and all other outstanding issues in Welsh courts, during my current irritant running on and on in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, even had to be raised only yesterday with his Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, the trial judge.
What seems to me to be yet another lawyer run piece of litigation that could be construed to be there to bleed both parties or tax payer or better still, as in the current 20 year run bit of scandal, the lot!
Why did I raise the issue in court yesterday? Because I am the impecunious party, no thanks to you, written in the most nicest way I can muster and unable to continue further litigation until out standing judgments in my favour are complied with and my own money given back!
a bientot