http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JVFh-AoHiU
20 Year Running Civil Damages Claim for Countless Malicious Prosecutions Continues 9th June in Cardiff County Court
I have fought for forty years for the preservation of the dwindling numbers of the lay magistrate and criminal and civil court use of jury service while the legal profession are so determined to tie up their last possible remaining source of revenue, in an open court, not already hitched onto their 'gravy train'.
My determination for Wales, never to get their own judiciary or it will finish up like a tax haven's system like Guernsey, is miniscule compared for the need to preserve an independant judiciary.
Analysis of this Musa case, the witnesses and documentary medical evidence used and not used, the huge unecessary expence and the conduct of Haringey Coucil cover ups, when all this could have been settled by early deportation of the whole family, is a waring to us all of things yet to come while white collar crime is so protected by HM Parnership..
Firstly, a comment on a circulating e-mail:
.........This case left 'egg on their faces' of certain supporters?
I do not accept that at all.
Remember,
the old 'misconceived belief' problem lies not just with a jury and in
the way the facts were handled, as in this case, it was no different to
many a case in which I have suffered.
All cases are reliant on the laws of disclosure and the integrity of those entrusted to administer it.
This Musa
case was no different. If you get relevant disclosure invariably the
case against you collapses but if you do not, well, take my latest jury
trial for example:
This fictitious idea there had been 'service of a Restraining
Order' on me, in the cells of Cardiff Magistrates court, about their NHS
(Wales) doctor, was just a small part in the twenty year conspiracy by
the Welsh Authorities to cover up 'white collar crime'.
It is now clear, now that I am out of jail to expose the culprits, that
this exhibit, later before a jury, marked 'Restraining Order' was, at
the time of the well filmed incoident, not even printed!
The Musa case is a classic example for the overhauling of the UK
adversarial system and secrecy of family courts, the latter ecpecially
tailored to steal the tax payer's money if their client has none.
Having experienced juries more times than the average recidivist I know they get wrong and once, I remember, either way.
'White collar crime' is the root cause of so many similar pantomimes in our
law courts and only MPs, with all your help, can sort it. These crimes
are ot just restricted to doctors,politicians and bankers, the practise
is rife in UK law courts because there are, deliberately, no effective
safe guards set in place to protect the vulnerable tax payer.
I visited the offices of the IPCC, yesterday, for example, in the suburbs of Cardiff, of all places! Why do I bother?
IPCC COMPLAINT http://kirkflyingvet.com/files/folders/south_wales_police/entry2571.aspx See recent Downloads on Home page
[ Demonstration date to be announced shortly]
I was complaining again to the IPCC as to what was afoot many months
before my 2010 'machine gun' trial, then from my psychiatric 'Gulag' cell in
Bridged, re South Wales Police painting the gun a different colour to
fool the jury.
Nothing was done about it, last time, so why should they investigate now
despite clutching, in their hands, signed witness statements from a
Lincolnshire air museum revealing the truth, the evidence of 'white
collar crime', withheld from that original well manipulated bemused
twelve?
Secondly, Michell Collins
http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Seven-Snatched-Nigerian-Children.aspx
[also on gallery]
(One of my photos used in the trial during that harrowing experience of verbal abuse)
Copy from notes of another:
This lady's report of my, Mr. Maurice Kirk, and Chiwar and Gloria Musa's
visit to the outside of her abode on the 12 September 2011 is completely
without merit, and is not a truthful report that she has given under oath to
the court. I was at the location at the date and time spoken of on 2 separate
occasions with Mr. Maurice Kirk, and what I consider to be a true version of
events I have tried to describe below.
To
begin with, may I describe the location of the abode of Ms. M. Collins. There
are 2 photos attached to this email which attempt to do this - pic no. 1 being
the abode itself, showing the position of M. KIRKs vehicle during the visit,
and also showing the front door doorbell that was used by Mr. KIRK in a close-up.
The abode is in a typical North London road. It is a terraced house,
nondescript in my humble opinion, about the same size average house one sees
all over London, with a small front garden, with a small driveway to the left
{or east} of the front door and front garden, a fraction over a car width wide,
extending from the house for about 10 yards to the typical London street
pavement and public road alongside. A small wall approx. a yard high adorns the
front garden.
The front door has a secondary extension directly in front of it, with a door,
this 2nd door being about 3 feet from the front door proper. The secondary
extension door has a bell-push positioned on it which Mr. Maurice Kirk used on
the day referred to, as shown in pic 2, a blow-up of pic 1. The pavement is of
standard width - typical for a London side-street.
Firstly, Ms. Collins stated whilst in the dock under oath that somebody
"banged on her {front} door" {in order for her to open her front door}.
This did not happen. Mr. Maurice Kirk, the individual who was summoning the
attention of Ms. Collins at the front door in question, rang the front doorbell
as any normal human being would {see 2}. To suggest there was any
"banging" on the front door is greatly misleading, and suggests a
type of behaviour that was not present on that day, as is suggested throughout
Ms. Collins report from the dock, I allege.
Secondly,
Ms. Collins said there was much "shouting" and that she felt
"intimidated" by the entire proceedings. There may have been
shouting, indeed there was, but this "shouting" came only from her
and did not derive from anybody else. Maurice Kirk, who engaged in almost 100%
of the interaction between Ms. Collins and himself, always spoke in a normal
voice which was never raised. Indeed, when the front door opened to reveal Ms.
Collins, no shouting took place at all. Maurice Kirk was holding in his arms
Ms. Collins cat, later to be put down on the ground by him a minute or so later
before Mr. Kirk retreated to the driver's seat of his vehicle. Had any shouting
occurred by Mr. Kirk, I put it to you the cat would surely have bolted from Mr.
Kirks hold in his arms, as, being in close proximity to Mr. Kirks
"shouting" voice, the cat would surely have found this somewhat
frightening. The cat obviously did not find anything untoward during his/her
time in Mr.Kirks hold as he/she sat quietly throughout Mr. Kirks preamble with
Ms. Collins happily receiving the attention Mr. Kirk was giving before being
put back on the ground.
Thirdly,
I do not recall Chiwar Musa, or Gloria Musa ever speaking to Ms. Collins at any
time, let alone raising their voices and actually "shouting" at any
time. I believe i did utter one sentence to Ms. Collins, which I do not remember
the subject of, but my voice was at a normal level, and i definitely did not
shout. Indeed, until the police finally arrived some 2 hours approx. after our
arrival, I found myself almost asleep in the back of Mr. Kirks vehicle -
finding the entire proceedings quite boring, for want of a better word. I would
say all concerned were far from producing any "intimidating"
behaviour we are led to believe occurred.
Fourthly,
Ms. Collins may have "called the police" as she claimed, {i did not
see her use any phone, mobile or otherwise, whilst in my sight} but it was Mr.
Kirk who got the police to arrive after calling them himself at around 90 mins
or so into our visit. They arrived, approx. 8 of them, in 4 marked cars, to
stand around and generally survey the situation, asking questions mostly to Ms.
Collins, and Mr. Kirk, who had exited his vehicle at their arrival, to stand at
all times with his hands in his trouser pockets, to show completely and unequivocally
that he did not intend in any way to use his hands, or fists, in any
inappropriate way. He seemed to me at all times to be peaceful, cooperative,
and talking in normal tones. I would refer you to the recoding made at the time
to hear the decibel level of Mr. Kirks voice. Indeed, the banter between Mr. Kirk
and the police seemed most friendly and unobtrusive, the police in my humble
opinion, realising no laws were going to be or had been broken, even though Ms.
Collins, I may add, claimed and told us again and again Mr. Kirk was breaking
the law by parking outside of her house {qu.} "on her land" {unqu.}.
As Mr. Kirk is a payer of "Road Tax "to the British government, he is
surely entitled to park normally as he did anywhere he is allowed, which
includes the road outside Ms. Collins abode. What's more, it is as much every
British citizens land as much as it his Ms. Collins's, and to make a claim like
that as she attempted I found not only ridiculous, but clearly without merit.
Fifthly,
Ms. Collins stated also that Mr. Kirk had blocked Ms. Collins driveway with his
vehicle - this being the driveway her car enters and exits her premises. This
is also questionable, as I clearly remember Mr. Kirk arranging the parking of
his vehicle so no inconvenience of any kind would befall Ms. Collins. Her
driveway was not blocked as is claimed as on the 2nd occasion we visited she
actually drove up in her car and parked it in her drive as shown in pic/attmt.
no. 1. During the 1st visit to Ms. Collins Mr. Kirk's vehicle was parked 250
yards or so away from the abode at all times.
So, to recap on the version of events as given by Ms. Collins under oath
regarding the 2nd visit to her on the 12th Sept. 2011, all I can say is her
report of what happened is not truthful and is very inaccurate and is not a
legitimate account of what happened. Indeed, surely if this account, in my
humble opinion, is without foundations of truth what are the rest of her verbal
accounts' foundations based on given under oath in a British court of law?
Truth or an inaccuracy? Sadly I concur the latter is at play here, witnessed by
all in that courtroom which is unacceptable in any court case where truth is a
requisite at all times, especially regarding accounts given under oath which
are sworn on a bible for the benefit of a jury and a judge.
THE
RECORDING:
Whilst
seated in the back of the vehicle owned by Mr. Kirk I happened to record on my
mobile phone about 5 minutes of the conversation between Ms. Collins and Mr.
Kirk. One can notice from this recording the level of the volume of Mr. Kirk's
voice and that he is not shouting in any sense of the word. The loudness of his
voice, I put it to you, is of a normal decibel level as one would expect
speaking to be during a conversation from a civilised human being. There is no
shouting whatsoever from Mr. Kirk as is suggested by Ms. Collins. {The
recording is made up of 2 parts, both parts approx. 30 minutes into the
proceedings from our arrival late morning on the 12 Sept. 2012. The recordings
are made a couple of minutes apart from each other and joined as one in the
finished item, and are noted on my mobile phone as having been recorded on the
12 Sept. 2012, and indeed are still on my mobile phone memory card which can be
shown to this day.}
EARLIER IN THE DAY:
Earlier that morning Mr. Kirk had called on Ms. Collins house at around approx.
8.30 BST whilst I remained by Mr. Kirk's vehicle. He had parked his vehicle
about 2-250 yards from Ms. Collins house further down the road from the house.
While Mr. Kirk was at Ms. Collins house I had exited the vehicle and was standing
by it at all times. During my standing by this vehicle I called Mr. Kirk via my
mobile phone about what seemed like about 5 minutes after he had left to van to
go to the house of Ms. Collins 2-250 metres away. When Mr. Kirk answered his
phone i heard at first muffled conversation between Ms. Collins and Mr. Kirk,
the bulk of which was coming from Ms. Collins, at one particular point her
words being "...not those effing kids again!". After those words were
clearly shouted, for it seemed that Ms. Collins was very irate and was talking
in an extremely loud voice, pertaining to shouting, I heard mumbled talking,
coming I believe from Mr. Kirk, which I could not understand. The phone cut out
at this point and I was unable to hear any further conversation. My phone was
on record during this episode, and this entire event I have described was
indeed recorded, though shortly afterwards on listening and re listening with
Mr. Kirk to the recording in the cafe opposite Hornsey police station my phone
malfunctioned and I lost this particular recording.
Minutes
after this event I walked up the road on the opposite pavement to Ms. Collins
house to see Mr. Kirk walking up the road, followed by a young black male, Id
say around 20 years old, and a young white female Id say around 25 years old
who was following the black male who as I said was following Mr. Kirk, both of
these people having exited Ms. Collins abode immediately after Mr. Kirk had
begun walking away from Ms. Collins house, being behind Mr. Kirk 20 and 35 metres
respectively, myself being about 30 metres behind them. All of us were walking
away from the Collins house towards the top of the road approx. 100 metres
away. Mr. Kirk arrived at the top of the road first, and he then crossed over
the road to the opposite pavement where I was approaching him. He spoke to me.
As we spoke the 2 people following Mr. Kirk, the black guy and the white
female, followed Mr. Kirk across the road and walked by us as Mr. Kirk
was speaking to me. The white female looked me in the eyes and I recipricated.
I was wondering who these 2 people were who had followed Mr.Kirk up the road
who had exited from Ms. Collins abode, and I put the female down to an "au
pair" or "housemaid" of some description. I immediately wondered
why there was a young male who seemed of African origin coming from Ms. Collins
house too.
After Mr. Kirk and I had exchanged words, and these 2 people I have mentioned
had passed us by Mr. Kirk and I split in separate directions.
Footnote:
AFTERWARDS:
Having left Mr. Kirk and all that transpired I arrived via public omnibus at
the cafe opposite Hornsey police station to await the Musa parents whom I had
arranged to meet around 09.30 that day for their signing on at the police
station. Janet, a supporter of the Musa cause, also arrived in the cafe to
await the Musas too who were due to sign on at Hornsey police station. Mr. Kirk
arrived also at the cafe after I had left him. We all were to be the Musas
witnesses that day to show they were signing on and fulfilling their bail
conditions at every opportunity. It transpired the Musas were told to go to
Tottenham police station to sign on by police at Hornsey police station, so we
all then went to Tottenham police station so as the Musas could sign on there.
Much has been made of the fact that the Musas did not sign on the 12th Sept
2011 anywhere, thus breaching their bail conditions, making them liable for
arrest, and indeed remand in prison which has now transpired. I can say under
oath I personally, along with 2 others, accompanied the Musas to both Hornsey
and Tottenham police stations on the 12th Sept. 2011 in order for them to sign
on and fulfil bail conditions and if it is reported by anybody - police or
otherwise - as it indeed transpired - this was definitely not the case, their
version of events is without any shadow of doubt untrue. The CCTV film footage
at either station will confirm what I have alleged and documented here to prove
what is written here is the truth. We were all called "liars" by the
counsel for the crown at Wood Green crown court and other characters at the end
of December 2011 when we tried to tell the court the truth about that signing
on at Hornsey and Tottenham police stations when we were witnesses for the
Musas but nevertheless the Musas were still remanded in custody for breaking
bail conditions, viz. not signing on at specified times and locations - the 12
Sept. being an example. - which they definitely did then. The CCTV footage from
either police station foyer would clearly show the Musas - and our - presences
there on that date.................
Thirdly, the Appeal and fate of the children
Where Are They?
There are many issues now for the Appeal team to consider not least being the original iniquitous politics that drove this gravy train so far down the tracks.
UK Police seize day old Nigerian baby, five siblings
There is likely to be an appeal with or without lawyers
eee384