Legal Battles

Part of letter to certain authorities 1 March 2012:

Todays calls from MAURICE KIRK calling from Cardiff prison today 1 March. The 2nd call was cut off by the prison after 64 secs.:

www.onetruemedia.com/shared

and his 2 calls from Thursday 29 Feb. from Cardiff prison explain even more irregularities

www.onetruemedia.com/shared

If you remember Article 6 of the ECHR states, regarding the questioning of witnesses:

">>> Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights {E.C.H.R.}, specifically states:

Section B: The right to a fair trial -

part 1. Guarantees inherent in the notion of fair trial -

item 1. The adversarial nature of the procedure and the equality of arms.

Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands (29 May 1986, para.44) – violation of Article 6 (1); the applicant had not been given the opportunity to comment upon the report of a medical expert.

Bönisch v. Austria (6 May 1985, paras 33-35) – the parties must have the same possibility to call experts; when an ‘expert’ is dependant by the prosecution, he had to be considered as a witness for the prosecution rather than as an expert and the accused has to have the same opportunity to use such an expert otherwise the principle of equality of arms will be violated.” >>>

...from = butlincat.wordpress.com/.../targetted-individual-maurice-j-kirk-letter-to-authorities-1-mar-2012

In a very recent comment - worth repeating here Bigwhistleblower Said:

"If a Court cannot produce a "Record of proceedings" - it cannot be deemed to have been a properly conveined "Court of Record".

It was a 'false court', a 'false tribunal', a 'false hearing', a "Kangaroo court".

Challenge the court to produce it's "Record of proceedings" - If they can't, won't and refuse to; then the proceedings must then be claimed to be a nullity in law / nullified in law

And "all and everything" that 'flowed and followed' from such a proceeding is a nullity at law.

February 21, 2012 11:02 PM

And here's something new - Is any Witness Statement produced in any Court [Especially the "civil and Family Courts!!!") - worth the price of the piece of paper it is written on?

Argument being that - the maker of the statement must be "compelled" to come to court to be cross-examined on their untested assertions .... [As if they were fact!!! Huh - deception]

We Can't have have judges - 'using' "uncorroborated" - 'utterings' offered up by lawyers as being "the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth" - can we now - not now here in the 21st Century?

Has the turkey shoot begun? Are they all primed for hanging and blooding?    

As Maurice said in Court - there is the Rule of Law and there is Cardiff Law. He has respect for the Crest but Cardiff Courts do not operate in accord with what the Crest stands for.

Cardiff Courts operate under Cardiff Law "under outside influence"

It is clear in Maurice Kirk's cases that "Cardiff Law" decisions and bench memorandums are influenced by external forces outside Cardiff's Courts and not under ".Dieu et mon droit"

This is the second time that Maurice has been refused the right to call out his accusor, despite the fact that he has proved before a jury of his peers that his accusor's allegations are false.

The court was worried that Maurice might cause further harrassment to his false accusor so they appointed a stooge, who has sworn an oath to the bar, to bodge the job up on his behalf, and like a good little servant he carried out the wishes of his masters.

The LAW says that you cannot be guilty of harrassment if you are uncovering a crime.

The JURY did not believe the psychiatric reports, therfore, in LAW they are false.

Knowingly writing false psychiatric reports in order to falsely imprison a man is a CRIME.

The COURT is supposed to pursue JUSTICE, they are only allowed, by LAW to stop him cross examining if they believe it will not be contrary to the interests of Justice.

There is clear evidence that a crime has been committed and a crime several magnitudes higher than the one that Maurice has been incarcerated for.

Yet the Court refuses even to entertain the idea. They should and could, quite properly, order an inquiry into the crime to be held forthwith and if they were remotely interested in Justice and upholding the LAW they are so fond of selectively quoting, they would lose no time in doing so in order to be seen to be fair.

So come on Denizens of Justice in Cardiff, hold an inquiry into the actions of Dr Mengle ( name changed owing to "legal" reasons) show the People what Champions of impartiality you really are.

"BY THEIR ACTIONS SHALL YE KNOW THEM"

How come that fraudulent evidence was encouraged to be produced by the HM Partnership to knowingly mislead the Court and protect a criminal.

Had this case not been dealt with under "Cardiff Law" this fraudulent evidence would have been rejected. Fraud and perjury is acceptable under "Cardiff Law".

Blackmail as witnessed by two senior HM Partnership Police Officers is also acceptable within Cardiff Law Courts operating under "Cardiff Law".

Again, it is no secret that certain officers based at Barry Police Station have their own agendas in respect of upholding any version of their Law.

An 'oddity' to ponder.

Isn't it funny how Mr Kirk was at least treated with some human dignity - when he got a little bit close to George Bush some years ago. They released him after some psychiatric tests - with a clean bill of health.

Odd really when we consider the inhumane torture that he has had to endure at the hands of the South Wales and UK's Judiciary .... Is anyone with a backbone at the IPPC or the Welsh Assembly or the UK's Parliament - listening!!!

They do say that they do 'listen' to the public ....

But then again they've proved themselves to be beyond the pale - time after time.

The despicable specific and "personal vendetta" against Maurice Kirk by those in every office of Higher Authority in South Wales - continues.

That it continues here in the 21st Century - is but the mark of so many 'evil and unprofessional' persons in the highest of offices - who 'hold themselves out' to be 'professional' as the so called protectors of the public and of acting in The Public Interest. What shysters they all are for their collective spinelessness.

Information is being posted into Mr Kirk and will continue to be posted to him.

But don't forget - every 'document' that is sent to him - is FIRSTLY intercepted and copied by those who have breached so many trusts and truths.

How odd that the previous Deputy Governor appears to have been 'promoted on', and out of Cardiff Prison for some or other reasons. He apparently has been parachuted off to Winchester or is it Dorchester Prison?

The new Deputy Governor appears to be even  more 'compliant' with what they are 'told' to do [another snake on the ladder perhaps] - against what is the law and the real truth.

All of the suborned lesser persons 'aiding and abetting' the bent & corrupt Judiciarymen in South Wales are as equally culpable and guilty for the crimes aginst the human dignity of Maurice Kirk - and will have to pay the price for their 'spinelessness' and complicity in the torture being perpetrated against Maurice Kirk.

A human duty of a normal and humane person is to report wrongdoing - put it on record and then let those in authority above be damned for their complicity in state torture.            

This is the first time I have heard of your battle for justice.i thought I had been a thorn in the side of police / courts. Your a legend.

I will follow you closely best regards Phil.