Legal Battles

All the lights are on - but it is still dificult to see in the dark !!!!!!!!!

We are told that the CPS do not oppose bail but Maurice is still locked up. Why!!!!

Because the Judge refused him bail.

Why does the CPS not tell the judge? - because their employees of the HM farmyard and milking parlours. Milking and leeching the public purse under false pretences.

We are also told that Maurice can only cross examine witnesses if he has a solicitor. Again, holding Maurice to ransom and blackmail to further milk the taxpayer.

I appreciate that the HM Partnership uses their Luciferian and sinister rule of chaos to torture, ridicule and confuse at whatever consequence to others; however, should there be a HM Partner with a concience perhaps he / she can assist in the public interest.

Surely? There are suckling cows unlawfully milking the public purse here under false pretences for personal and financial gain?

Quote - Welsh farmer said - If I treated my animals the way the HM Partnership is treating Maurice, I would be in very serious trouble.

There is no HM partnership it is just a highly inept system where some are very unhelpful and some are helpful.

The CPS are presently helpful on the issue of offering not to oppose bail, - so now Mr Kirk needs to find a different Judge who will be helpful.  

If Mr Kirk' could get a letter/application to crown court now, - or a lawyer do it for him, - and if then Crown Court Judge agrees, then the potential is that Mr Kirk would be out today.  

FREDBLOGGS - Maurice would willingly have applied to the court for bail - had he had the forms!!! He was asking for weeks to no avail. Then they were sent on Friday but of course its all changed now and M's sister said today {Mon} - "The CPS support/have agreed to his application for bail, so he just needs to get the SIGNED form into the crown court - he must sign it" - he is up tomorrow where he can give the forms in at last. They sectioned him in the prison hosptal on Monday {was it genuine?} only to take him back to his freezing cell escorted by 17 police officers - what an absolute joke!!  www.butlincat.wordpress.com

Butlinscat, thank you for your very helpful contribution.

I am not sure but for the way the Court staff spoke, it may be the Crown Court only needs a signature from Mr Kirk, and so a short simple letter may do.

There is the 56 days limit for being held on remand, (unconvicted) for only a summary offence. So they need to release Mr Kirk by end of this week unless.............

This 'police and section' is also too confusing. Police do not attend prision apart from a criminal incident/investigation or riots. Therefore claims of section seem also a bit ........

Please can people ask which Section eg Section 2, Section 3, Section 35. I am not in tune with which section is which but it has been a major UK wide problem in the past, of forensic psychiatrists transfering prisoners due for release to a hospital by use of section. If a section occurs, then there must be a 'section 12' doctor. Dr David Seeley (spelling?) is the only Cardiff NHS 'section 12' doctor 'based' at HMP Cardiff. Since 2010 Mr Kirk is now a Cardiff NHS patient - not Caswell (as his Barry address is part of the Cardiff NHS). So if Dr Seeley is not involved, there is need to know which doctor(s)  meddles. Very important to know in case of links to Caswell Clinic. Any link can be important evidence.