Maurice insists in being arrested only for the purpose of going to court and meeting the judge who convicted him in his absence, despite his request for adjournment. But the Court is far from co-operating. Here's his account with questions to the Court.
The NHS has asked their solicitors about the release of the medical records. The Judge and the Police's solicitors are meeting in Maurice's absence.
Is the only purpose for solicitors to run up bills, while Maurice not only suffers physically, but is also made to suffer the anguish of having to be arrested for an indefinite period?
The Police are only doing their job. And the lawyers who tell the Law Enforcers what their job is, don't care, do they...
The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (through their lawyers) are protected from any wrong doing by their 1967 Royal Charter. Here's what they should have done:
Extract
of 2004 Statutory Instrument:
20.3 On receipt of an application to which this Rule applies, the application shall
be listed for hearing within 3 months.
20.6 At the hearing of an application to which this Rule applies -
(a) The applicant shall be entitled to address the Committee, and to adduce evidence
and make submissions, in support of the application;
(b) The Solicitor shall be entitled to address the Committee, and to adduce
evidence and make submissions, in opposition to the application.
As Louise Casey, the Victims Commissioner, said to me: we've got a hearts and minds job at hand...