Latest News

Here is a question for all the legal eagles out there on both sides of this particular fence.

"Is it still a crime to interfere with the Royal mail since they sold it off to their masonic buddies for a bargain basement pittance?"

I received a letter from Maurice asking that the message below be put this site. Days after trying to make that so I notice it still has not been posted. Really, I do believe certain so-called "supporters" aid and abet MK's imprisonment and have as much brains as this joker "Exposer" above with the daft comment.

Here is Maurices message:

"THE INHUMAN TREATMENT OF MAURICE KIRK IN CARDIFF PRISON

Posted on November 5, 2013 by butlincat

Here is a message from Maurice Kirk, telling of the blatant and inhuman victimisation by the Cardiff prison regime towards him:

” 1st November 2013

Kirk versus South Wales Police BS614159 etc

Position Statement

1 It has taken 15 days to obtain “canteen” only for nearly all of it being stolen from my cell.

2 Seven days ago I attempted recorded delivery documents to a lawyer and important witness only to find neither had received nor I being able to obtain “proof of posting”.

3 On 25-26 of October the Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) visited reception to ascertain why HMP will not return/release either my passport or car key as the car contains legal data for all outstanding cases.

4 Reception staff refuse to either hand out or post either items or allow the claimant to have details of his debit and credit cards access to his cheque book knowing that his house is to be repossessed due to mortgage arrears.

5 Second IMB visit on a Saturday afternoon is warning enough for me to know “HM” has stepped in to block enquiry.

6 30th October I am informed of “1 hour” legal visit no other information forthcoming. I am never called only to find out next day it was the Bristol psychiatrist to consider a follow-up brain scan and fit or not for court.

7. 31st October prison doctor appointment never happened despite waiting

1 ½ at the exit door suspicious of HMP intent.

Copy to CCRC

(Signed Maurice J Kirk BVSc) "

signed  butlincat75@googlemail.com

This message also received with the above message from N. J. Kirk:

"Regina v. Maurice Kirk - T20130801

Application for Crown Court Intervention

1]  The combined effect of H.M. Prosecution Service, H.M. Court and Tribunal Service and H.M.P. Cardiff, all in South Wales causes this defendant to apply for all his criminal cases now and in the future to be transferred to England.

2] HMP Cardiff have again cancelled a follow-up brain scan despite the findings of  His Honour Judge Richard Thomlow and the director of Caswell Clinic in 2009 both indicating to the court the Defendants inability to cross examine the witnesses.

3] Due to failing health this Defendant on the understanding all current criminal cases and future civil cases are transferred to England, then he is prepared to change his plea.

signed

M. Kirk BVsc"

MK asks on the back of this above message received that the above be published before the 7 Nov. Even though this wont appear on his main site due to the non-input of those who call themselves"supporters" at least its in the comments and might be seen which i suppose is better than nothing.  We live and learn.

And with reference to the writer above who doesn't like "acting like a typist" - remember you have you freedom and Maurice Kirk doesn't and its the least you can do to type out a few sentences.

I remember Maurice was STILL asking for forms whilst imprisoned in 2011 with which to appeal his imprisonment 6 weeks after you claimed to have taken care of that [ I have the calls still from him from that exact time]. The simple fact was you hadnt taken care of getting the forms he requested at all at all, hence his still asking 6 weeks later for them - on realising what was happening i went to my computer and printed off the forms he so desperately needed and sent them to him - so much for your "help" then.

I remember also sending important documents from Maurice who asked they be sent to you and put on his site. Did you? No, you didnt. I sent them initially to you via ordinary post and you claimed not to have received them, so i then resent them via recorded delivery "signed for" and you sent somebody else to pick them up from the post office after they werent "signed for" when the postman tried to deliver them the first time - AND STILL they didnt show on this site. Luckily another proper supporter put those docs MK sent up on this site within 24 hours of asking him.

And I notice you couldn't help referring to "Melissa Laird" who you claim, Mcneil, to have helped so much, with or without your "Mckenzie Friends" "set-up". How you can claim brownie points by claiming to have "helped" Melissa Laird beats me when she ended up deported and stranded in the USA with her passport revoked thus with hardly a chance to fight for and retrieve her removed children here in the UK! That was no victory that you boast - that was premiditated very clever cunningness!!  To be stranded in another country with no chance of leaving with ones removed children in another country is grotesque, yet i saw your self-applause about getting her out of prison!!

OMG BUTLIN CAT ,YOU REALLY HAVE BEEN SUCKED IN BY THE LIES KIRK IS SPREADING YOU MUST BE REALLY EASILY MANIPULATED AND A GULLIBLE PERSON

It is interesting to note, Exposer, that your first sentence contains the phrase "an alledged innocent man", presumably you have already judged him to be guilty?

It is actually the other way round and he is alledged to be guilty (of whatever unsubstantiated charges they happen to dream up, like, for instance, trading in machine guns) but presumed (by the Law) to be innocent untill he is proven guilty in a court of Law.

As for your question "why" is he being persecuted, well the real reasons are, to be frank, beyond your obviously limited comprehension.

You seem to have confined yourself to a personal attack on the man, (whilst he is languishing in gaol and unable to defend himself, incidentally, or perhaps not so!) and you lay the blame for all his woes on the fact that he refuses to conform to all the ridiculous rules and regulations that are imposed on society in general by a thoroughly corrupt and criminal government, judiciary and police force. ( I cite last years Swansea police corruption debacle of a trial as prima facie evidence)

As for why he lost his family, you probably cannot concieve of a social services that would carry out orders to threaten to take his child into custody for their own (the masonic cabals) ends.

As for your hearsay evidence that he has admitted whilst drunk, ( well that would stand up in court wouldn't it? actually it probably would in some of the "trials" that I have witnessed!)  it is again interesting to note that you state as "fact" that he was being unfairly arrested! A freudian slip from someone in the know perhaps?

There really is no need to feel sorry for the " so called intelligent" supporters of Kirk, some of his most enduring friends know well what he is like but can see beyond that to the real issues at stake here!

Regarding your nearly getting sucked in to his "make believe world" well firstly the corruption and conspiracy ranged against him is absolutely real, you are in fact making believe it couldn't possibly happen in order to preserve your own limited conception of the world in order to stay within your comfort zone and secondly I rather think that what you really mean is that he sussed you out before you could do any more damage to his cause!

I just wonder who pays Exposer to write what he writes and post it oodles of times in the middle of the night.

Police staff?

Having followed this silently for several years and watched the crass comments posted here last night may I say that Maurice, whilst some of his exploits are perhaps questionable passionately believes in what he does. On numerous occasions he has demonstrated that he is prepared to give up his freedom for what he believes in.

Sabine - I do not wish to question your efforts, however soom of your comments linking things to your own campaigns seem to serve little to help Maurice. It appears he has trusted you to take care of his blog - yet you seem to have failed him greatly. Why on earth have you not removed his comment with respect to taking only one phone call with respect to the doctors house.

Surely leaving a blatant threat to arson on the website only serves to compound Maurice's predicament and reinforces the position of people against him. I cant help but wonder if his comment was simply one written in a drunken moment of stupidity and not intended to be in such a context.

Maurice is a 68 year old man, he deserves better than prison - so why leave the comment on his website, it only serves to make things worse for him? Is that what is wanted?

Sabine - I am sure that Maurice will appreciate the removal of the post that I referred to in my previous comment.

I am sure that it was not removed before due to your workload on other matters.- good to see its now gone.

Dear Cat Lady,

I'm afraid there's more to Maurice's and my campaigns that your cat eyes will have come across.

But THANK YOU for your interest, support and comment!

It is good to see that people are watching developments on this site and commenting on the situation.

Guido / Butlincat - It is clear from your comments that you are trying your best to help Maurice, hopefully he will get the support he deserves.

Sabine's comment " I'm afraid there's more to Maurice's and my campaigns that your cat eyes will have come across" does seem to have a rather sinister and almost superior undertone to it. By inference it could easily  be misread on many levels. Does it help Maurice? Or does it create doubt and uncertainty about the "real" agenda of Maurice?

Sorry to be pragmatic, but it made me a little concerned. Reading Sabine's comment does make me wonder if my comments of support and interest in Maurice's plight has been somehow misread by Sabine as support of her and whatever other causes she promotes either covertly or overtly.

Sorry Sabine, I know nothing of any causes that you promote other than your apparent help of Maurice. You do infer that Maurice has a hidden agenda and you are in collusion, does that help Maurice?

As Maurice will have no internet access whilst in prison is he even aware what is being claimed supposedly on his behalf?

Please understand Sabine, my comments are not criticism of you or your efforts, they are merely the observations of a cat sitting on the fence

Today 9 Nov. 13 I received a letter from Maurice dated 7 Nov., the gist of which was as follows:

"Had  4th burglary in 7 days [of his cell]. This time found my stamps and radio. [in other words the thieves who entered his unlocked + open cell stole these items from MK].

"Please send 4 1st class stamps after that i should be ok as i have made local arrangements.

I am still refused:

1] release of my car keys to my legal papers in there

2] Jxxx refused visit despite 2 visit application [in c wing and e wing]

3] refused send out my bank card for someone to pay my bills

4] will not let me hear dvds of of police interview

5] ELEVEN applications for police to take my statements of complaint re: 2 trials, one appeal and doctor's fraud - all ignored

6] received all letters."

These points, which are against the Human Rights Act and their own "guidelines" and more will be forwarded with a copy of the letter to MoJ inhabitants at Monck St., London and and others, including MPs and members of the judiciary as have already been sent by recorded delivery on the 1 Nov. - obviously ignored by those sent to if visits, for example, are still being refused. If murderers and paedophiles get can visits then something is very irregular if MK cant, apparently on the 5th floor of a lifers wing.

Cat Lady - u say: "As Maurice will have no internet access whilst in prison is he even aware what is being claimed supposedly on his behalf?" -  MK is sent printouts regularly of everything on this site, and copies of what is sent to anybody, by myself at least. Whether he gets these or not is of course a chance one takes but he replies that hes received letters, and emails sent all the time to him inform him when to expect what. Obviously I cant speak for other people but I for one inform him of everything I can.

 J. Graham

Butlincat - thanks for that. I don't know Maurice, I am glad he gets to see what is written. I can only go by what has been written. I am just surprised that he trusted Sabine and she has (in my opinion anyway) seemingly abused and betrayed that trust. Her comments with respect to threatened arson have left me cold. My reasons for that conclusion are in my other posted comments. To me this blog is for MK and should not be detracted from by almost smoke screen tactics

Maurice clearly can have no quick input to what is posted here.