Unusual, indefinite
and extreme
a. What
does unusual mean ? It is a polite way to introduce the abuse of power. In
other words in the absence of good faith - malice. In this case targeted
malice.
b. . Is
it usual for so many incidents from 1992 to 2002 and once they achieve their
target to strike me off for being in conflict with authority they stop? No more
prosecutions
c. Was
I in conflict with authority to win most of my cases? Was I just a madman
causing problems for authority to go to win most of my cases? Or was there an abuse
of the power of authority to target me more than is usual reasonable or
proportionate attempts to prosecute?
d. How
does the unusual occur? One way can be as the case taken up by the current
Attorney General Dominic of Kate
Bowman.. – Police abuse their power and act maliciously by false and mischievous
intelligence reports that are intended and designed to cause harm
e. Where
did the intelligence reports come form to first trigger all this? Guernsey
f.
Does Guernsey
matter to this case? It does when SW Police ignore my endless complaints to
senior officers that I am being targeted, and targeted disproportionately. As in the Katie Bowman
case who is helped by the Attorney General a conservative constituency MP mischievous
use of intelligence reports that amounts to Targeted malice. They knew of a
problem and did nothing about it
Indefinite
and extreme
a. What
does extreme mean in this situation ? It
means that from 1992 to the present day my being bullied by their abuse of power, - 20 years
of “Get Kirk” - the targeted malice means as at present, today, Police will not
allow me to go to my home but lay magistrates will.
I dare this court to resolve just that.
b. It
means that I could not drive through the Vale of Glamorgan with my wife (a Government
adviser) without the risk of being incarcerated for no reasonable cause
c. It
means they sought to deny me my livelihood which I understand – and I ask his
Honour to note – that my understand is that denying livelihood is one of the
more or most serious wrongs or abuses of power.
d. It
means I was not safe to go out without fear of being targeted for arrest of
prosecution.
f.
Then we have a few examples of mischief targeted
I.
The witness in Indonesia/scrap yard and Inspector Rice
II.
Mr Ebbs/Alexander and again, Inspector Rice
III.
The lady who saw me beaten up by a policeman in llantwit Major Town Square
IV.
My receptionist who witnessed police say “Get Kirk” and refusals to investigate veterinary surgery burglaries
V My Somerset insurance agent telling on how police were even ringing head office in order to block my getting motoring insurance
VI The elusive Inspector Steven Parry and the fanciful stories of a bottle of high alcohol 'mouth wash' etc etc
g. All
this will continue unless the Court intervenes
Conclusion
- The
Claimant asks the Court to note that the continued absence of good faith
by senior police and officers of SW Police is evidence of bad faith. The
Claimants submits that it is not believable that the Officers did not know
the Claimant’s identity or that they could not find him on other occasion.
But could find him and identify him when they targeted that he be
arrested.
2. That there were
prosecutions and interference to cause harm, and when they succeeded to
strike off the Claimant, all the prosecutions and interferences stopped
until each time this case was listed for trial. Then the gang mentality came back with a vengeance.
3. The Claimant
also submits that the prolonged absence of good faith of so many incidents
could only have occurred because of there was targeted malice ......
4. The Claimant
believes that the Defendants are liable for misfeasance.