02 Legal Battles

Carwyn Jones AM
First Minister
National Assembly of Wales

Edwina Hart AM
Minister for Health and Social Services
National Assembly of Wales

23 March 2011

Dear Mr Carwyn Jones AM and Mrs Edwina Hart AM,

Re: My Welsh Operation will now be in France. Is this the best future for Wales?

Important New Evidence that tests the State and Future of Wales NHS.

Mr David Sissling leaves as the local Chief Executive at ABMU LHB to be Chief of the Welsh NHS in May 2011. Edwina Hart as Welsh Health Minister and Mr Win Griffiths as Chairman ABMU LHB were being very helpful by seeking Mr David Sissling to address my concerns.

However, is it your place to intervene on the bigger issues and policy effect on the culture of the Welsh NHS, by whether the future NHS Chief Mr David Sissling's approach is appropriate, for the people of Wales to have confidence in the oversight by Welsh Ministers?

"Clear Evidence" of Brain Damage/Cancer - Available Facts about Dr Tegwyn Williams:

1) It appears, especially given his constant refusal to comment, that Dr Tegwyn Williams decided this brain damage existed without using any appropriately medically qualified doctor to allow or support his conclusion.

2) Yet it seems, when not using anyone medically qualified to progress such a view, that in 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams wrote to the Crown Court to say that there is "clear evidence" that I have brain damage. Furthermore that the brain damage (that Dr Tegwyn Williams says exists) is supposed to also, according to Dr Tegwyn Williams, give an incurable condition leading to an unhelpful behaviour change, so to support that I may need to loose my liberty indefinitely, when I have never been convicted of any relevant or serious offence. 

3) Furthermore, Crown Court transcripts of 2 December 2009 record a Crown Prosecution Counsel, Mr Twomlow, saying that Dr Tegwyn Williams wishes his concern about my having brain cancer to affect the decisions by the Crown Court.   

"No" Brain Damage, "No" Cancer: by Two Sets of Evidence from both France & Wales.

4) In August 2009 properly qualified medical doctors at the Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend and later, in Southampton University, give an ‘all clear' brain scan result.

5) Yet, Dr Tegwyn Williams asserting brain damage or cancer means that my urgently needed hip operation cannot occur until surgeons are certain of what conditions may exist. Limited disclosure of records only added to confusion and delay as Dr Tegwyn Williams refuses to clarify about brain damage and cancer.

6) In February 2011 properly qualified medical doctors in France did a new brain scan and concluded also an ‘all clear' brain scan result.

Questions I ask be answered:

1. Do six Medical Opinions that contradict what Dr Tegwyn Williams says and his refusal to comment, adequately present a reasonable suspicion for the employer, Mr David Sissling, to act?   

2. Why is there inaction to protect minimum standards, when ‘to be seen to act', the employer only needs to ask the General Medical Council to investigate to form their view?

3. Will this inaction justify more people to be forced to refuse to use a belligerent Welsh NHS?

4. Why is the future leader of the Wales NHS allowing and so supporting Dr Tegwyn Williams to behave as he does?

5. I am an Englishman granted Asylum in France in order to avoid Dr Tegwyn Williams' jurisdiction to use his opinion again to cause more harm or affect my liberty.

6. If I have to go to the additional strain of proving in the Welsh civil and criminal courts, by way of a private prosecution, that Dr Tegwyn Williams has acted dishonestly and maliciously, will my needing to so act spearhead that the Wales NHS uphold the basic minimum standards or will I inadvertently, as good as prove that Mr Sissling and therefore Welsh Ministers have abandoned important responsibilities and duties for which they take office and are paid?

7. My wife and daughter continue to live in the Vale of Glamorgan. Can I have your assurance the serious erosion of minimum standards in the Welsh NHS will be immediately addressed and rectified?

As you are both experienced and able politicians, I am sure you will welcome that I look forward to placing your reply alongside various comments on my website.

Yours

Copy to

• Mr Win Griffiths, Chairman ABMU LHB
• Mr David Sissling, Chief Executive, ABMU LHB
• Media Wales
• BBC Wales

The picture was taken when the 4 bundles were ready to go to the Court of Appeal in London, a day after the rugby win of England over France - hence the St. George's flag but on 6th March Maurice receives a High Court letter saying the Appeal must be heard before a 'single judge', in Cardiff of all places! Just how much more incestuous can this case get?

The bundles contain, above all,

Questions asked in House of Lords...see latest DOWNLOAD

• the Draft Order
• the 40-page Judgment on Preliminary Issues
• Permission to Appeal from a common sense perspective
• Permission to Appeal by a legally trained mind
• the refusal to appeal by HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC
  
• the Grounds for Appeal - besides oodles of documents illustrating:
  

1. the bullying and harassment madness of 39 motoring incidents, between 1993 and 2002, that were used to get Maurice struck off the Register of Veterinary Surgeons (2002)
2. evidence of delaying this civil court action (lodged in 1996) to progress, by stepping up the level of bullying and harassment through MAPPA (Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements), firearms response, 7 months imprisonment, including 3 months incarcerationin a psychiatric clinic, claiming serious brain damage, possibly brain tumour
   
3. evidence of the torturous mis-management of medical records by the NHS and its organisations, preventing Maurice from having his painful hip replaced (first scheduled for June 2010!).
   

After a month of 24/7 frantic court preparation, house bound in a forest in Brittany, in much pain and up to his knees in screwed up A4 paper, empty wine bottles and half eaten plates of food, battling against the ‘invincible prejudice' of our UK judiciary, Maurice finally crawls on to his settee and falls asleep.

With no phone line or internet for weeks and hobbling so badly now, just to get to his front door, today manages to get to the village's oh so erratic access to cyberspace and e-mail. The Skeleton Argument for the Royal Courts of Justice, on a deadline, goes at last, only for it to bounce straight back, meaning it has to go via Berlin!

HM Court Service gremlins, once again, are interfering in the ‘due process' of law, the guys now, with a little help from  the South Wales Police, now seeming to have taken over the purpose of the ‘lay magistrate', lay jury and statute law, our last bastions of impartiality, setting aside the moment, the Freemasonry argument and even the occasional judge, now, is spotted quietly edging, by inconceivable steps, towards  ‘political discretion', for judgment, rather than using the truth and the ‘Rule of Law'.

Today, the K-Team finished the Skeleton Argument, some 37 pages, for the Court of Appeal in London, a legal view of a potted history of an Englishman's experience of his 20 years of purgatory, trying to go about his business in South Wales, as a veterinary surgeon, where ‘Law and Order' is now clearly a joke and where ‘Big Brother' is being groomed as a testing ground. So what does he have in store for YOU?

Maurice knows full well, just how lucky he was, not getting locked away for life in a high security psychiatric prison. He often has sleepless nights reliving his sheer hell in Caswell Clinic. Falsified medical reports by Dr Tegwyn Williams & Professor Roger Wood nearly worked, as well as nearly being shot by South Wales Police, under the pretence of him being a MAPPA dangerous predator!

He will always remain indebted to friends and the ‘silent helpers' in cyberspace, that published world wide the evilness oozing out of Cardiff and Bridgend's Authorities that year.

Next time they will be a little less arrogant and plan a little better, control coming from Whitehall next time, which is why he is one step ahead, at the moment, on asylum in France.

The power of websites, to educate those few who wish to listen, must be made more effective now that websites and telephone interference is rampant, so, please, watch your back.

PS from the sister blog (over 1,700 hits since September 2010):

The K-Team is a miraculous network of support that has formed around Maurice and includes a superb legally trained mind.

One of the outcomes is this 37-page document with 268 paragraphs. It asks the Court of Appeal to consider a number of things:

1. to "consolidate" the four actions into one
2. to consider how the lower Court erred in law on a number of levels
3. to look at the whole case in terms of "bullying" which means including cumulative effects
4. to think about the implications for public services, Parliament and the electorate
5. to remember human rights
6. to consider a level playing field between Claimant and Defendent (a huge organisation)
7. to take into account that Maurice can't get a lawyer.

All in all, the best possible overview that takes all aspects of Maurice's life into account, except what preceded South Wales: Guernsey and Somerset.........