Once again the words will be written "Regina vs Maurice Kirk". These words echo across countless pages of court transcripts meticulously typed up over tens of years.

However, Maurice Kirk begs to disagree, he does not regard Regina as an adversary. He actually bears no personal grudge against Regina or any of her kith or kin. Rather it is her employees he is concerned about, those who take her name in vain and use their positions and powers to ruin the lives of innocent civilians throughout the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. It is they who have caused him decades of controversy against which he, being a believer in truth and justice, has had no option but to defend himself or to litigate.

Maurice Kirk, in common with millions of other civilians across the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth, has wished for a very long time that Regina would discipline her millions of employees, all those who have sworn an oath, all those Chartered or wearing the symbol of the Crown upon their garb. He wishes that Regina would do her duty to all her subjects and delegate orders for those who act in her name to act in accordance with the age-old principles of human rights which are now enshrined in the UK Human Rights Act 1998 and other Commonwealth and international Human Rights legislation.

In common with many who have in-depth knowledge of the system gained by personal experience, he wishes that the links between the defence, academic, police, legal and psychiatric fraternities were exposed and torn asunder. Of particular concern are those involved with human research, the tactics and technologies of surveillance and the influence of the human body and brain.

Regina is in the unique position to unravel the matrix from the top down, unless it is her wish that her subjects should live as a psycho-civilized society.

It was reported that during a conversation she had with Paul Burrell (Diana's butler) the Queen stated that there were unknown forces at work.

"When I came back, I was in grief along with the rest of the world. And then the queen asked to see me at Buckingham Palace. And what she said in that meeting was, "Paul, do be careful. You know, there are forces at work in the country of which we have no knowledge."

Fox News report

I was grieving. I saw the Queen and she warned me of dark forces.

Interview on BBC Radio 4's Today programme

Maurice wishes that those operating under the aegis of Royal Charters would deny their prerogative of ‘non-recital' (concealment) and ‘mis-recital' (deception). In particular he wishes that the courts and judges, ministers and civil servants would renounce the orders which explicitly command them to give favourable treatment to the chartered bodies. In order to achieve this, he wishes that Regina would order the Privy Council to change the wording of all Royal Charters from that which provides immunity and pre-excuses improper conduct.

Maurice Kirk himself has even been in Regina's employ. He has faithfully applied his skills as a veterinary surgeon on the Prince of Wales estates. In fact, on one occasion when he had been dehorning the royal steers, his journey home was interrupted, a commonplace occurrence, by the South Wales Police and he was charged with being in possession of a dangerous weapon, a garrotte - actually embriotomy wire for dehorning cattle. The boys in blue were obviously well informed about the precise contents of his veterinary kit for that day and were prepared once again to exercise their powers against him.

On that occasion he was arrested on suspicion of being in possession of an offensive weapon. Next he was charged with being in possession of an offensive weapon. He was 48 years old and spent 3 days in Cardiff jail during which time the South Wales Police said that they did not know who he was, after which all charges were dropped by the magistrate due to lack of evidence.

Maurice Kirk has experienced a perennial problem with being permitted to hold a trial with jurors, as courts were held in the old days. He feels that the presence and opinion of twelve civilian equals might negate some of the sanctioned lies and withholding of information of Regina's servants. Unfortunately he does not anticipate that this chronic challenge will be addressed in his favour.

He would greatly appreciate it if at least his named adversary Regina would appear to face him, and if that is inconvenient that she should appear on video-link, and if that is inconvenient that she should apologise for her absence.

He would prefer, of course, that in each session of the court, Regina would pardon him from the offence of the day caused by her loyal servants.

In the current case regarding the ownership, registration and sale of a single decommissioned, inoperative World War 1 machine gun, Regina should understand Maurice Kirk's current situation better than any citizen of the United Kingdom. Regina owns numerous buildings across the British Isles which are full of weapons dating from the most ancient to the most modern. Regina owns armouries brimming with pikes and staves, rapiers and swords, cutlasses and flintlocks, blunderbusses, rifles and bayonets, most of which have been meticulously restored and preserved in perfect working order. On Regina's rooftops and terraces, hundreds of canons stand at the ready with cannonballs at their feet. They point outwards across the land aimed at thousands of innocent civilians.

Has every single one of Regina's weapons been registered? Does Regina hold a licence for every single firearm on her premises? Or is Regina exempt from the rulings of the Firearms Act?

How can Regina, the owner of thousands of fully operational weapons, be versus one man who does not own a single weapon and who did not own, nor was in possession of the single deactivated firearm in question when he was arrested and charged under the Firearms Act?

"Regina vs Maurice Kirk", these words will assuredly reverberate across the land until his dying day or conversely until they are changed to "Rex vs Maurice Kirk".