Whilst enjoying every second in Brittany, France, 'meticulously' flight planning [Please note Bristol CAA Flight Examiner] my Piper Cub flight to Cape Town, South Africa and ship to Argentina, possibly, I have to stop every thing, even put my fine glass of 'Cuvee de la Salette' down and write the following response, following further plain wickedness from the South Wales Police.
The HM Home Sectretary, [Hearing 25th November in Cardiff], now, bless her, refuses to disclose even 'occurrence' numbered police logged details, even under the Data Protection Act or Freedom of Information Act.
Documents affecting RCVS and South Wales Police cases from her 5 year running 'investigation' in Whitehall' to have me certified as a 'Vexatious Litigant' she is also withholding. So what's new , I say?
Just what the RCVS achieved from the HM Information Commissioner following the South Wales Police invitation for the RCVS lawyers and lay staff to visit and examine police confidential records on me in Cardiff Central Police Station. [Contrary to 1987/45 HO Regulations]
But just what does the web site reader make of this latest gem from the South Wales Police' published below causing me to write to Jaqui Smith?
Further and better details on http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/ 'downloads' and http://www.wacl.org.uk/ later this year (when I have the cash!)
The Specialist Listing Section
Cardiff County Court/Mercantile Listing
Civil Justice Centre
2 Park Street
CARDIFF
URGENT - case management conference 25 / 26 November 2008
Dear Sirs,
RE: MAURICE KIRK V SOUTH WALES POLICE / LEAD CASE
NUMBER BS 614159 / ALSO CASE NUMBERS CF101741 / CF 204141
We refer to previous correspondence in connection with the above matter and the case management conference listed before His Honour Judge Chambers QC on 25 and 26 November 2008.
We also refer to the application issued by the Claimant listed for hearing on 19 November 2008 but which was not dealt with due to the failure of the claimant to attend the hearing.
We have previously filed the witness statement of Adrian Paul Oliver for the Defendant for the consideration of His Honour Judge Chambers QC. We can confirm that we received a position statement from the claimant by e-mail at 10.02 am on 19 November 2008. We enclose a copy of the same for the benefit of His Honour Judge Chambers QC. We can confirm that e-mail did not provide the enclosures referred to in that letter.
We also note, at page 6 of this e-mail that there is a reference to the Home Secretary being represented in court on 25 November 2008.
We would draw the court's attention to the fact that neither the application of19 November 2008, nor the proceedings which are the subject of the case management conference have any reference to the Home Office or the Home Secretary.
Our enquiries indicate that the court has not listed any application in respect of the Home Office to be heard on 25 and 26 November and there is no standing of the Home Office or Home Secretary in these actions.
[ NOW no Home Secretary hearing listed for 25th as Home Office say 'not ready']
We have copied this letter to the claimant so that he might be under no illusion that the hearing next week should have any reference to any separate cause of action or proceedings in which he might be involved with another party. We would be grateful if a copy of this letter could be placed before His Honour Judge Chambers QC at the earliest opportunity.
Yours faithfully,
DOLMANS
John Smith MP Esq,
House of Commons, Westminster.
22nd November 2008 Your ref: K/2002
Dear Mr Smith,
Abuse of Process Application-Cardiff County Court 25th November 2008
Further to my last letter of the 2nd November matters have worsened.
I enclose my letter to Home Secretary and 17th Dec 07 schematic flow chart for indicating the HM ‘Partnership' affecting both Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons [RCVS] and South Wales Police court cases. I have exhausted all remedies available to me, other than you, my Parliamentary representative.
- 1. On the 31st October 08 the HM Home Secretary's lawyer admitted, in Cardiff Court, there was still a ‘team of lawyers' in Whitehall {with all my court files, transcripts and tapes?} under the instructions of HM Attorney General to try and get me certified as a ‘Vexatious Litigant'. This will block ‘Disclosure' of the criminal conduct by not just lawyers. I have already a sample of leaked HM internal memos implicating several under the Home Office or Ministry of Justice.
- 2. HM Home Secretary's lawyer also agreed to ‘disclose', the date now well passed, just what had been going on for 5 years with HM Treasury Solicitor that has so seriously prejudiced my actions for damages for false imprisonment and on the matter of failure to Sect 31 Disclosure rules by both the South Wales Police and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, the latter stating that the Information Commissioner, for the Data Protection Act 1966, considered all interviews of my Barry, Vale of Glamorgan, veterinary clients by RCVS lawyers or lay staff were ‘privileged'!
- 3. The RCVS even falsified witness statements they reluctantly served on me just before the 2002 trial, following complaints by the South Wales Police to have my name removed from the veterinary register for but one reason.
- 4. On Tuesday His Honour Judge North's Order, to make the Home Secretary ‘disclose' anything relevant, will be ignored as have my previous applications under the DPA Act and Freedom of Information Act. No one seems to be accountable to anyone anymore, do they?
Yours sincerely
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Copy to http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/
HM Home Secretary, Case number: 8CF02269
London
22nd November 2008
Re Judgment of £15,360 for False Imprisonment you owe me
HM Partnership
Dear Jacqui Smith,
You are due to appear on Tuesday in Cardiff court but there has been no ‘disclosure' as you promised His Honour Judge North, not even filed defences I require in rebuttal. You did not attend the 19th November 2008 hearing. Am I entitled to know why?
I will do a financial deal with you if you ‘disclose', under CPR Sect 31 Rules, the following:
- 1. Just what confidential records about me, held by the South Wales Police, were disclosed to Penningtons, solicitors, of Gutter Street and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons lay staff, contrary to Home Office Regulations 45/1987, causing erroneous information and a fictitious conviction against me to go before the RCVS court to have me struck of the veterinary register?
- 2. Just what caused the 5 year ongoing ‘investigation' by a team of HM lawyers to have me certified as a vexatious litigant in the first place and just who else is behind this vast expense to the tax payer hell bent on withholding evidence concerning my false imprisonments and 10 years of consolidated police harassment by the South Wales Police?
If you do ‘disclose' then will withdraw my Court Order for your £15,360 on Tuesday and pay YOU a similar sum for your kindness. The law allows me this evidence.
There appears to be both a Malfeasance and An Abuse of Process within the HM Partnership here in South Wales all dependent upon ‘Her Majesty's Prerogative' for immunity from prosecution.
Yours faithfully,
Maurice J Kirk BVsc
Enclosed: Schematic flow chart dated 17th Dec 2007.
Copy to Mr John Smith MP, http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/ & http://www.wacl.org.uk/
In The Cardiff Court Claim Nos. CF6141159‐MC65, CF101741, CF204141
4th Action 7CF07345 5th Action 8CF02269
Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police
Claimant's Response to Defendant's Position Statement 17th November 2008
I, Maurice Kirk, as an Englishman in Wales, make this statement in response to the Defendant's position statement dated 17th November 2008.
•1. Yet again I rely on the ‘balance of probabilities' in civil law, my human rights, my Abuse of Process Application, listed for the 25th/26th November 2008 and my countless Disclosure Applications, over more than 16 years now, due to the malicious failure for proper Sect 31 Disclosure etc by the Defendant when applied for either by my original lawyers, my own Applications in Magistrates, Crown, County Courts and/or direct, in writing, as ‘litigant in person' unable to obtain independent legal representation.
•2. This 4th Action needs, I say again, to be adjourned in order for the Particulars of Claim to be simplified following that Disclosure in all Actions to which I am entitled under the law.
•3. Denial by the Defendant that 1) welsh court cases ever took place, 2) 34 {35} times I had to produce valid motoring insurance 2) aeroplanes were burnt out, 3) there was sufficient evidence to prosecute when I was thrown down the stairs into hospital by a known criminal in front of her officer and my wife, 4) Cardiff police took a crow bar to break into my veterinary surgery to re house a police inspector's daughter and drug dealer and 5) she had me sent to prison on the pretext I could not be "identified", is an indication that there should be a halt to these legal proceedings and an independent enquiry as to why the Welsh Authorities have gone to such lengths to cover up the criminal conduct of a handful of reject attorneys.
•4. The 5th Action is currently levelled at the HM Home Secretary only because of the 16 years of ‘treacle treatment' here in Wales while an Englishman is attempting ‘due process' of statute law for reasonable compensation for a string of false imprisonments and harassment by the very same defendant each time. It appears she ceased and her ‘activity' on the very day, 29th May 2002, the Defendant, complainant to the RCVS, obtained my name from being removed from the veterinary register in order that I may no longer ‘practice veterinary surgery' and have an income.
•5. The 200 odd police incidents, touched on in the current 4th Action Particulars of Claim, lie almost exclusively in the 10 year period of intense harassment by the South Wales Police, 1992-2002, details of which are set out in the original 3 Actions for damages. Documentation between parties prior to October 2002 and what was said in the 31st October 2003 hearing further confirms there was an agreement to adjourn further proceedings being lodged as to have done so could have jeopardised my basic right to have a trial by jury. The unlawful way I was denied a jury trial is history but will be referred to at The Court of Appeal as yet another example of malfeasance by those in positions of privilege.
•6. The reason for The HM Home Secretary, now to be represented in Cardiff court on the 25th November, to face the Abuse of Process Application in the 5 Actions is to allow the Management judge to hear how both the South Wale Police and RCVS made secret complaint to the HM Attorney General in the early 2000s in order to have me certified as a Vexatious Litigant and so jeopardise my rights, in law, in their respective Actions as defendants.
•7. On 31st October 2008 and in writing the HM Home Secretary admitted, for the first time by any one, that there had, in effect, been an ‘Abuse of Process' due to the conduct of the South Wales Police and lawyers employed by the RCVS to have my name removed from the veterinary register so as to impede income and so my ability for a fair trial.
•8. 2003/6 leaked HM memos, [samples served on this court], confirm the conspiracy and explains why my own barrister was refused ‘sight of' Cardiff Court files, relating to all these 5 claims because they were apparently ‘lost'! They were no more ‘lost' than I am a Freemason. They were in Whitehall with the HM Attorney General. Many of the 130 odd files are ‘lost' now along with the file marked "Maurice J Kirk -Potential Vexatious Litigant" shown to me by Cardiff court Staff full of numerous communications between the police, Royal College of Veterinary surgeons and Home Office agents.....ALL FOR ONE PURPOSE.
•9. Refusal by HM Court Service to produce it now further confirms why a huge team of tax payer paid Whitehall lawyers today continue to ‘beaver away' to block exposure of the conspiracy.
•10. The Management Judge's 31st Oct 2007 Internal Memo [enclosed] further confirms my worst fears suggesting my Abuse of Process Application should first be heard in the Cardiff Court. But I have delivered the ‘meat on the bone' to numerous courts and police stations from about the land and no one will lift a finger because this despicable cancer is rife throughout the British Judicial System by being dominated by devil worshipping freemasons.
•11. The HM Home Secretary, represented by the HM Treasury Solicitor has now admitted it, in Cardiff court , before HHJ North and gave ‘undertakings', following my Applications under the Data Protection Act and Freedom of Information Act to ‘Disclose' the tape and transcript of the 28th October 2002 hearing when the South Wales Police referred to the agreement for no further incidents of alleged ‘harassment or malfeasance' were to be served on the Defendant for fear it would be ‘document heavy' for a civilian jury to ‘understand'. What utter rubbish.
•12. No Disclosure by HM Treasury Solicitor has occurred and entry to his RCJ offices was refused. Why is there my evidence, needed now, somewhere in London, God knows where?
•13. Most of the defendant's current statement is plain verbiage printed off from the last such statement with one purpose only ...to push up the costs with little regard as to who pays.
•14. Exactly the same conduct of her co-conspirators, The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, who on each of my 10 monthly ‘de novo' applications for re instatement to the veterinary register, by simply pressing the repeat button on their computer £12,000 will again be granted, full costs, out of hand, when not even taxed or court papers read by the High Court judge. [See Royal Courts of Justice transcript and time sheets of Mr Justice McComb in Kirk v RCVS July 2005 and witness statement of Mr Patrick Cullinane Esq. who saw it all]. It stinks doesn't it but who cares?
•15. I set a ‘test case' to show my web site readers, since my last application for Disclosure, to indicate just how widespread the incest and wickedness is, not just here in South Wales, should one become so unfortunately entangled with such an insular ‘authority'.
•16. In Oct 2008 I wrote to the Defendant and to my Parliamentary Representative, Mr John Smith MP, the latter having witnessed the very same scandal back in 2002 when Defendant admitted Christopher Ebbs was immune to prosecution. UK judges closed my web http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/
•17. My 4th October letter was direct to the Barry police and a similar but a different 8th October letter was to Barbara Wilding, the Area Chief Officer, in response to Occurrence Numbers issued by South Wales Police following some random picked 40 odd incidents reported by me. I also wrote on the 16th October to the Defendant's lawyers for similar ‘Disclosure'. Again, none responded with any ‘Disclosure' or as to what ‘progress' or lack of it [4th Action] had been made in the 40 odd incidents of complaint despite their original letters, each indicating they would.
•18. Further comment on the Defendant's 17th November 2008 position is futile in the absence of ‘Disclosure' of facts within her knowledge or by the HM Home Secretary and her agents. Failed access to ‘independent legal representation', to allow me to fairly present a ‘skeleton argument' and my claims for damages, is a further but far more widespread a conspiracy across the UK.
•19. Both Data Protection Act 1966 and The Human Rights Act 1998 are a farce and were written for one purpose only. The latter deliberately omits the most crucial paragraphs in the European Convention on Human Rights, ‘protection against malfeasance', conduct of the State, the main reason why it was signed in the first place, on 10th Dec 1948, 60 years ago.
Signed: Maurice J Kirk BVSc 18th Nov 2008
.
Copy to John Smith MP & http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/ & http://www.wacl.org.uk/ Paris 10th Dec Protest... BE THERE