John Smith MP
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA
11th September 2008
Dear Mr Smith,
South Wales Police - Treacle Treatment
Further to my letter of 8th September 2003 expressing the above and your 15th Sept. reply, stating my ongoing case was receiving your personal attention, I now give you an update.
In 2003 I had asked the Police, Crown Prosecution Service and Magistrates to retain all records relating to my complaints, arrests and imprisonments, leading to approximately 121 charges out of 130 being thrown out. These 7 were latched upon, incidentally, by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons following a complaint from the police to have my name removed from the veterinary register.
The police disclosed confidential records to the RCVS contrary to Home Office Rules 45/87.
The Magistrates refused to disclose, the CPS handed over a token sample but only by my taking them to court. The Police delayed 5 months whilst my, then solicitor, wrote about five letters before the police force solicitor finally refused to supply any records at all.
From then on external solicitors for the police have avoided that disclosure to which I am entitled.
Civil courts in Wales also appear to ignore my right of disclosure as was the case in the criminal courts. Lord Justice Thomas, in the Royal Courts of Justice, has refused both legal representation and a Trial by Jury, the original and only purpose for suing for damages.
Over 30 Law firms, specialising in police harassment, incorporating over 80 lawyers have refused to act on my behalf at any stage in these 15 years of litigation following the sacking of the original incompetent Bristol law firm.
I enclose 5 Actions for Damages, my desperately needing legal representation to proceed. [see also on web site downloads]
The 5th Action was blocked by Mr Justice Andrew Collins, Manager of the Administrative Court of the Royal Courts of Justice, until his two year Extended Civil Restraint Order expired. The ECRO was applied for by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to block disclosure during my futile court attempts to be re-instated to my life's vocation.
The 5th Action was changed from that of the South Wales Police as defendant to the one ultimately responsible for their conduct, namely, HM Home Secretary.
Cardiff County Court refuses to enforce the £15,360 Judgment in my favour having returned my cheque.
It is no surprise to a Patrick Cullinane Esq., a fellow chronic litigant, also ‘in person', who has personally attended my court cases both before the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and Royal Courts of Justice (see transcripts) to witness the judges not even bothering to even read the lodged case files.
HM Attorney General ordered my files in this case be rounded up from the Welsh Courts and for several years were with a team of lawyers in Whitehall attempting to have me certified as a vexatious litigant. Leaked internal memos indicate the extent to which the police have gone to hide their conduct.
Mr Vincent Cable MP recently chaired a meeting at Westminster for chronic litigants from his constituency. He then left his seat and immediately asked questions in the House.
I again ask you for a meeting on behalf of litigants in South Wales and others that have suffered under the criminal conduct of those within the UK judicial system apparently immune to prosecution due to either a Royal Charter or ‘Her Majesty's Prerogative'.
Yours sincerely,
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Copies to Mr Vincent Cable MP and 600 chronic litigants worldwide
http://www.wacl.org.uk/ & http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/