7 March 1990
The Clerk of the Court of Appeal
Royal Court House
St Peter Port
Dear Sir
The Channel Islands' prosperity was founded on piracy and in
particular against English merchantmen. After the war, Sir Winston
Churchill swore never to set foot on this island, because of the
collaboration of the island administration with the enemy. The UK
tax-payers subsidise the Channel Islands for millions of pounds every
year unbeknown to either. The indigenous section of the Guernsey
community has suffered appalling injustices under an oligarchy driven by
avarice, the control of which is held by just a few interbred families
who will stop at nothing to retain the local people as serfs and
exploit other British subjects who choose to come and live on this
British Island.
HM Government, ultimately responsible for the administration of the
Channel Islands, allows the banks of multinational companies to use the
islands for tax avoidance if not evasion, in return for their support,
with no benefit, to either the UK taxpayer or Guernsey resident not with
the ‘chosen few'. The judicial system in Guernsey and possibly
Jersey, is incestuously inter-twined with the executive in both the UK
and Channel Islands to maintain the status quo.
As an Englishman perusing my right through the court for what is
lawfully mine, I specifically asked that my partnership swindle,
instigated by corrupt local lawyers, who ran a cartel, go before an
impartial tribunal (as per Article 6 of the European Charter for Human
Rights) but what have you done?
You tell me today you have handed my applications to the Court of
Appeal concerning my partnership swindle to the only Court of Appeal
judge residing this week who has strong Channel Island ‘connections'.
My letter to you of 1 March 1990 stated that even though visiting
Court of Appeal judges are subjected to the disgusting track record this
island has of corruption and that they have to keep their mouths shut
because that are on some form of penance with the promises of promotion
later in the real world, I ask that you remove the papers immediately
from Sir Godfrey Le Quesne and place them before an apparent independent
visiting QC (QC meaning Queens Council not Quaintly Corrupt) as is the
meaning of the letters of the reject attorneys De Vic Carey and Day, the
prosecution of Guernsey who help vote on the permanent jury.
Yours faithfully
Maurice J Kirk