Search results matching tags 'machine Gun' and 'Professor Roger Wood'

Just how Incestuous can this Cardiff Court get? QC, Solicitor or Judge to be Arrested on Monday? [Can o fwydod]

Maurice — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 08:46:00 GMT

On Monday, at 2pm, 11^th July, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre my machine gun/false psychiatric reports, damages claim starts, having been refused a jury or it being transferred to England. They are for South Wales Police's unlawful attempts to having me jailed my life, unconvicted and attempting to have my 10 year old daughter ‘taken into care' by the Welsh courts, NHS and Welsh Social Services.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC has already ‘struck out' an incident when police were caught on their own overhead road video [see website You Tube], beating me up in a Cardiff street and, later, in police cells and another incident he knows about, when the police withdrew reason for arrest aka ‘Breach of the Peace'. This judge ruled, "damages cannot be claimed against police if, after each incident complained of, you happen to pick up some criminal conviction, however trivial, whether related or not!"

This same judge, would you believe, has already refused to accept some 130 odd allegations, lost by the police, winning only around 12, is not an extreme example of police bullying !. He has ruled the first five Actions for damages will not be heard together, transfered to the High Court or will get a jury.

South Wales Police will be asking the same judge these latest damages claims, that caused me over seven months imprisonment, including three months of shear hell in Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison, must be adjourned for at least 5 years to allow the previous 5 Actions be heard, appealed and disposed of in their usual perfunctory way.

This Cardiff Cabal, of deceit and intrigue, have already managed to delay my 1st Action for damges for 19 years, my solicitor dying meantime, with key witnesses now either settled in old people's homes, senile or dead.

Come witness this judge block the recorded evidence of a criminal conspiracy by South Wales Police high ranking officers, in Barry police station and Caswell Clinic recorded in their own MAPPA minutes using the excuse it falls under PII, ie not in the public interest!

It stinks, doesnt it?

I am off the morphine so come witness real criminals being arrested, to eventually face private prosecutions by the people, their ‘Achilles Heel'.

Copy to HHJJ Seys Llewellyn 10^th July 2011

Dear Mr Oliver and His Honour Seys Llewellyn,

The Criminal Prosecution of Dr Tegwyn Williams and Merging all twenty years grievances into a case that Judges then approve to hear before a Jury in England

We refer to the letter 27 June 2011 regards case management hearing 11 & 12 July should not go ahead if the plan is to prevent fair trial, by not allowing access to justice of the opportunity to list all twenty years grievances into a case where selected issues of the twenty years can then go before a Court preferably before a jury.

We apologise to Mr Oliver for confusion in how the original transcript of letters (and specifically the letter 23 June 2001) on behalf of Mr Kirk are added to by many volunteers. I hope we can clarify as follows

Whereas Mr Kirk would know of grievance as to why private prosecutions could occur to many. To date, may be for reason of logistics, those of us who try to Mr Kirk write with more exactness, only have clear enough evidence ‘to immediately proceed' with a prosecution of a criminal case against Dr Tegwyn Williams, in England, if necessary.

It occurs to those of us who try to help Mr Kirk write in ways more suitable to helping the working of the Courts, that it is within Mr Oliver's responsibilities to his client SW Police that he would be eager to bring a criminal prosecution against Dr Tegwyn Williams, so as to distance SW Police from being tarnished by Dr Tegwyn Williams criminal conduct.

Given the basic evidence as below against Dr Tegwyn Williams is so very clear indeed, and obviously a very serious matter, if Police or their lawyers do not bring a prosecution against Dr Tegwyn Williams that leaves individuals in S.W. Police or individuals at their lawyers open to the charge of conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams. It is a clear enough case to be easily merit and be investigated by an outside police force.

I am sure a man of standing such as Mr Oliver would not wish the good name of his client SW Police or their lawyers be drawn into allowing credible allegations of criminal conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams. We therefore would like to hear from you as to how you propose to help facilitate a prosecution regards Dr Tegwyn Williams.

To clarify we remind that the clear criminal case against Dr Tegwyn Williams is that;-

Dr Tegwyn Williams wrote to and attended the Cardiff Crown Court, including on 2 December 2009, with information to substantially affect the outcome of the Crown Court and ways that could be expected to significantly contribute to losing Mr Kirk his liberty for life, by the single assertion that there was irreparable brain damage and possible brain tumour that affects behaviour.

Dr Tegwyn Williams must have known that Mr Kirk did not have brain damage (to affect behaviour) to merit indefinite loss of liberty.

Mr Kirk does not have brain damage from assessment in Wales, England and France

Dr Tegwyn Williams did not use anyone who is medically qualified to determine scans to say that Mr Kirk has ‘brain damage' and was not entitled to progress the view he did.

We ask you to receive this information with care and to be very clear, precise what you do with it and exactly who you pass it to at South Wales Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (Wales).

As stated, we feel that in such a clear case of wrongdoing by Dr Tegwyn Williams, anyone not acting to bring a prosecution when able to do so, may be obstructing justice or merit charges of being in a criminal conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams.

The outcome will also be added to the twenty years of events that we consider should go before a jury trial.

We look forward to hearing from your kind self with news of how Dr Tegwyn Williams criminal conduct is to be addressed.

Please would his Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn note that we feel the 'mindset' that may emerge from this letter can be so relevant to be ‘grounds to appeal' following the decision of HHJ Seys Llewellyn on 11 and 12 July 2011.

Because the ‘mindset' here can indicate whether there was substantial unfairness in previous cases, before His Honour Seys Llewellyn, to even justify changes to case law, we feel it should all be addressed.

We see grounds for using the EU Court of Human Rights limited on the kinds of such ‘very clear' issues as above.

Yours,

Mackenzie Friends from around the world

Another approach is this, below or anarchy, perhaps and we take to the streets not forgetting other methods, in reserve, to concentrate their evil little minds.

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre 11^th July 11 Hearing for MAPPA Disclosure and application to put off Machine Gun Damages Claim for Five Years

Kirk v South Wales Police    6 Actions for Damages

Kirk v NHS, Dr Tegwyn Williams, Professor Wood, HMP Prison Cardiff

Applications

1. A can of worms or a can of worms?

2. Last two years ‘mindset' of South Wales Police calls for the trial judge to re consider his 2010 judgments, currently subject to appeal.

3. Transfer all litigation to England

4. Transfer to High Court outside Wales

5. Consolidation of cases due to extreme and unusual case of blatant police bullying making previous case law, relied upon by Defence, as totally irrelevant.

6. Machine Gun case, falsified psychiatric reports and other failed 2010 police prosecutions, all for the Defendant to delay ongoing civil actions, should be given to an outside police force for a thorough independent criminal investigation.

•A.     HM Court Service (Wales)

1. HMCS refuse Claimant access to public counter

2. Communicate by e-mails

3. Make telephone calls for clarification

4. Allowed pay court fees by credit card over phone

5. Allowed to have affidavits sworn at court before a Court Order dead line

6. Conspired to prosecute common assault conviction (2^nd Nov 2010), ignoring medical evidence, HMCS not placing evidence before the District Judge

7. Court manager & HM Treasury Solicitor's ‘internal memos', circa 2003, re ‘Vexatious Litigant' registration, revealing miserable but expensive attempts over five years + and losing vital court files to block Claimant's right to the rule of law.

8. HMCS refuses to disclose information to the Claimant in the trial and conviction, in Claimant's absence, now before Welsh Administrative Court. Immediate withdrawal of bail restrictions and arrest order when part release took place in May 2011.....utter abuse of process and criminal conduct.

9. Deliberate withholding of ex MP's obtained independent medical report for 2^nd Dec 2009 hearing, castigating Dr Williams on intrusive dangerous POW unnecessary brain scan and giving false evidence for 10 Cardiff Crown Court judges.

•B.      Criminal Conduct of SWP solicitors, Dolmans of Cardiff.

1. False Feb 09 Chief Superintendant sworn affidavit despite Dolmans having been supplied with 50 odd Claimant lever arch files identifying the court cases and police break-in to his veterinary surgery with Barbara Wilding denying knowledge thereof .

2. 22^nd July 2009 Dolmans had Claimant jailed and ignored trial judge 2010 Court Order to disclose details of complaint that had to his arrest and jail, designed to delay civil trials.

3. Dolmans fully aware Dr Tegwyn Williams' false psychiatric reports concocted by police for Claimant's incarceration in Broadmoor for life.

[‘Significant brain damage', brain tumour and evidence on 2^nd December 2009]

4. Claimant receives Estimated Defendant's £800,000 legal costs

5. Refuse mediation for the cash or from tax payer quoting trial judge's view!

•C.      Trial Judge

1. Claimant refused to prosecute several incidents because convicted despite being unrelated to his proposed prosecution or after specific bullying.

Eg.   a. Overhead video catching Claimant being beaten up by police

         b. Breach of the Peace allegation withdrawn due to forged police papers, countless court irregularities and CPS perjury before Recorder of Cardiff.

         c. Roundabout incident and motoring conviction irrelevant to "We will get the ***" said by police and overhead heard by veterinary nurse planted in back of court due to Claimant's absence. All refused incidents now subject to appeal, in Wales, having been refused an English court.

2. Refuses to consolidate.....4^th, 5^th damages cases and 'machine gun' case whilst defence application is to put off the latter, effectively, for 5 years.

3. MAPPA minutes disclosure so far refused identifying more in the conspiracy, sat around eight tables, to have Claimant either shot or jailed, IPP, for life.

ie 8^th June 09 Barry police station MAPPA meeting, no one ever told the Claimant and 1st June 09 IAG meeting at police HQ, 3 weeks before arrest registered in level 3 MAPPA, top 5% most dangerous , with the hpe of getting him shot (see leaked MAPPA memos). 17^th Dec 09 Claimant's name removed from MAPPA surveillance, again, without explanation or knowledge of Claimant until too late to inform judge for bail.

•D.     Machine Gun Trial

South Wales Police arranged with CAA for four other identical ‘guns', on replica WW1 aircraft or museums to be taken by owners to gunsmiths! In Claimant's case the Welsh police travelled with it, often alone, 2000 miles, contrary to HO gun Regulations, touring the UK desperate to frame the Claimant for mandatory ten year prison sentance.

English police washed their hands if it refusing to arrest either new owner or previous owner of Lewis machine gun so Welsh police called them as prosecution witnesses after attempting to modifying the ‘gun' more, for trial, police knowing the new owner had , himself, modified it, contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

Machine gun trial heard no evidence of Claimant's ‘permanent brain damage/brain tumour' with the trial judge pretending he knew nothing of it.

Claimant refused repeated bent legal representation, sent into prison, gave no evidence, called no witnesses , refused judge's demand for defence statement, refused to sum up , jury making up its mind on the very first day of evidence stating, to the Claimant's friends and relations in a Cardiff restaurant immediately after the shambolic trial, "all the police were lying".

NHS, Williams, Prof Wood, HM prison (Nov 2010 £50,000 judgment awarded to Claimant, by trial judge against HM Prison Cardiff is still live. Retired HM Governor ignored thi judge's Order for ‘Governor at the time' statement for any disclosure of audit trail or did HMCS block serving of the summons for false imprisonment in the first place? It stinks, doesn't it?

•E.      Police/NHS/Dr Tegwyn Williams/ Professor Wood/ HM Prison Conduct

Claimant' forced prolonged illness was a deliberate tactic by most of above Defendants to prejudice his civil litigation.

After Claimant's release from prison, on 9^th Feb 2010, NHS refused to carry out a brain scan or operation, Welsh GP practices refused Claimant as a patient and only by going to France did he obtain a brain scan and urgently overdue hip replacement, in March 2011, to get him off powerful analgesics and other mind hallucinating drugs for acute pain.

Human Rights abuse was rife, but who, in Wales, is counting?

Summary

Another typical example of antiquated adversarial UK legal system, contrary to European methods of obtaining the truth, propagated in Cardiff, this time, for their HM Partnership ‘gravy train' to prolong proceedings for as long as possible using, yet again, the tried and tested method of ‘Treacle Treatment', to Delay.

7. By this court, not consolidating cases, not transferring to the High Court, out of Wales and for independent police force not examining Claimant's private prosecution evidence served, again, this week at Cardiff Central police station and currently before an English criminal court, this trial judge is at serious risk of abuse of process, blocking mediation and settlement out of court, many knowing a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice within the Welsh judiciary is proved.

8. The Defendants are relying on the usual ‘treacle treatment', for a Claimant against the State, to either ‘run out of money', ‘run out of steam' or, simply, ‘die'.

Voltaire wrote, something like, ‘When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right'.

The Claimant believes, there is only one truth, no matter which litigant has control of it.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

St Doha

Brittany.

.

Lord Justice Moses caught on VIDEO Refusing re Dr Tegwyn Williams' Falsifed Medical Records Conspiracy to obtain My IPP Imprisonment

Maurice — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:07:00 GMT

Royal Courts of Justice, today...What a load of nonsense. The Appeal before Lord Justice Moses et al, was today!

"No, Mr Kirk, you cannot have an oral hearing ....we have already decided to dismiss your Appeal" (arguing with Cardiff judge, Nicholas Cooke QC, who damned well knew Williams was lying nor had the qualifications to try and section me to Broadmoor, on his interpretation of an NHS brain scan!

Now RCJ judges are in on the act.

Imagine that approximate account of what was said in front of Rear Admiral rtd. Norman Scarth Esq. provoked?!

The pandemonium in number 9 court, with utterances of truth only from the well of the court, leading to eight security guards, ready to drag out two old men must be published see video here:

A Den of Evil - Maurice Kirk & Norman Scarth in court 28/6/2011

Anarchy is just around the corner and it starts at Cardiff Magistrates tomorrow at 10 am. and then across the country

See new photos on Gallery.

A Bradford judge sent Patrick Cullinane to prison for four months simply for using an audio recorder in court.
If Lord 'Justice'(??) Moses had any guts he would have stayed in court, called security to take us down to the cells & then sent us to prison, as Patrick was. Instead, while the next case was supposed to be proceeding, he, Mr Justice Maddison and Leeds Recorder all scuttled out like frightened rabbits, leaving the pathetic female usher to act as though she were God Almighty!
Norman Scarth

Magna Carta Day,15th June, Public Demonstation, Leeds County Court -- 'Right to Private Prosecutions' Meeting 12 Noon

Maurice — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:08:00 GMT

Adrian Oliver of Dolmans Solicitors has been the Solicitor of South Wales Police and is the MasterMind behind "defending" all bullying incidents, the cumulative harassment and the multi-organisational collusion under the label MAPPA.

See 'HM Conspiratorial Partnership' in Cardiff magistes courts as an example of blocking Private Prosecutions here:this document.

"Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power, be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law must provide a speedy remedy. Otherwise the victims will find their own remedy. There will be anarchy."

Lord Denning: 1982

WANTED

(Picture on gallery or Downloads)

Following posters, shortly,on gallery

Judge T M Hughes QC

Judge Morris

Judge Vosper

Judge Llewellyn Jones

Judge Elleri Rees

Judge Gareth Jones

Judge Neil Bidder QC

More Cardiff Judges to come

IN THE CARDIFF COURT

Maurice Kirk Appellant

Chief Constable of South Wales Police Respondent

Particulars of Claim

1. The Defendant is and was at all material times the chief officer of the South Wales Constabulary and the police officers hereinafter referred to were at all material times acting under the direction and control of the Defendant in the performance or purported performance of their functions. 2. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft.

3. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 aeroplane and ‘gun' from a private collection with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' as an integral part of the fuselage.

4. 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This became the critical argument in the trial.

5. 2000: The DH2 with the same Lewis antique was flown by the Claimant at the Farnborough Air Show by invitation of Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame.

6. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' dismounted.

7. 2007: The DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out, by the RAF, to a civilian for further repair in Hampshire.

8. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and gun to another display pilot who modified the gun for his own purposes.

9. On 25^th February 2009 the Defendant signed a sworn affidavit knowing it to be or ought to have known it to be, false in that paragraphs, between14 to 21, contained erroneous information, namely, incidents, involving both the Defendant and Claimant, had occurred

10. Following the 2008 Court Order by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, for the Defendant to sign an affidavit that full disclosure of evidence, under her control, had been disclosed to the Claimant, the latter entered the Defendants solicitors offices, on or about the 25^th February 2009 complaining the court order had not been carried out.

11. The Claimant, upon receipt of a copy of the Defendant’s affidavit entered Barry Police Station and was both videoed and interviewed at length following his complaint that the Chief Constable had knowingly signed a false affidavit to avoid disclosure of evidence relevant to the nineteen year running civil action for damages, CF101741 + three others..

12. On 1^st June 2009 the Defendant caused the Claimant to be subjected to Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) enquiry following a meeting, at the South Wales Police Head Quarters, Bridgend, by the Independent Advisory Group.

13. On 8^th June 2009, at Barry police station MAPPA meeting, police informed the agencies that the Claimant was to be arrested and taken into custody for being in possession of a prohibited weapon.

14. The police also informed the agencies that should the Claimant approach the Chief Constable then he was likely to be shot.

15. On 15^th June 2009 the Claimant brought further civil proceedings, in the Administrative Court, London, against the Defendant when police were called to be in attendance.

16. On 18^th June 2009 the Claimant again laid the complaint, this time at the offices of the Defendant in her Bridgend head quarters .and again, refused mutual exchange of witness statements.

17. On 19^th June 2009 the Defendant again refused to exchange witness statements when her solicitors were contacted by the Claimant despite the court order having given until 4pm.

18. On 20^th June 2009 the Defendant’s solicitors laid complaint against the Claimant to be arrested for threat of criminal damage.

19. On 21^st June 2009 police Operations, ‘Orchid’ and ‘Chalice, caused’ a sizeable force of police officers to surround the Claimant’s home, in St Donats, Vale of Glamorgan, requiring an armed response unit, a police helicopter and both forensic psychiatrists and a lay advisor for the Claimant to be in attendance. The operation was aborted once the Claimant was seen drinking tea with his family in their front garden.

20. The English police refused to ‘touch it with a barge pole, once they became aware that the Welsh police had persuaded the Civil Aviation Authority to telephone the new owner, in England, to dismount the Lewis antique and alone drive it across Lincolnshire and beyond to find a licenced arms dealer where it would be collected by the Defendant.

21. The Welsh police then hawked the Lewis antique nearly two thousand miles around the UK, contrary to Home Office Regulations during which time had it modified, to be illegal, contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act at their special laboratory in South Wales.

22. On 22^nd June 2009 police returned to the Claimant’s home and arrested him in the road outside his property, cautioning him that he had been arrested for: a. Threat of committing criminal damageb. Being in possession of a prohibited weapon c. Being in possession of prohibited ammunition.

23. The Claimant was never charged with the first arrest allegation and despite court orders from His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC to reveal the evidence and statements by Dolmans, solicitors, falsified to assist their client, the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Ms Barbara Wilding.

24. Between 22^nd and 23^rd June 2009 the police removed the Claimant’s lawfully held shot guns, ammunition and court files relating to the Claimant’s ongoing Claims of bullying, harassment and false imprisonment none of which have been returned to the Claimant.

25. On 24^th June 2009 a police officer or officers laid an information against the Claimant at Barry Magistrates court alleging that that the Claimant had been in possession of a prohibited weapon, one 1916 Lewis machine gun and had sold the gun, both contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

26. Upon reading the Claimant’s June 2009 64 page Defense statement the Barry Magistrates court, following legal advice, allowed the Claimant unconditional bail.

27. On 25^th June 2009 the police appealed the court order lying to HHJ Hughes causing the Claimant to be detained in custody in Cardiff prison.

28. Lies by the Defendant were used, eventually, before ten Cardiff Crown Court judges, no less, refusing the Claimant disclosure of evidence, under their control, that would have cleared the Claimant’s name.

29. In July 2009 the Defendant brought a third indictment namely, ‘income from crime’.

30. On 3^rd August 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams, forensic psychiatrist and Director of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police forensic Unit, at Bridgend signed a psychiatric report recommending the Claimant be sectioned and further remanded to his medium secure psychiatric unit, Caswell Clinic, under Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act.

31. In September 2009 when it was clear the Claimant was not going to employ a lawyer sworn to the Welsh courts Dr Tegwyn Williams recommended that the Claimant be transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, IPP, imprisonment for Public Protection.

32. On or about the 24^th October 2009 the Claimant was further remanded in custody in Cardiff Prison reliant on a further Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric report the Defendant knew or ought to have known was false.

33. On 9^th February 2010, at Cardiff Crown Court, the Defendant having earlier withdrawn the third indictment, was found not guilty on all remaining indictments and was released from custody.

34. No defence evidence or summing up was needed from the Claimant with further confirmation by nine members of the jury confirming to him that their decision of ‘Not Guilty’ was already concluded by eleven of the jury after the first day of evidence was given and cross examined.

35. The jury also made the Claimant aware, immediately after the hearing, that they questioned why both the original seller to the Claimant, of the Lewis antique and the current owner were not both also in the dock as defendants.

36. The Claimant’s complaints to the relevant police authorities, to investigate the conduct within South Wales Police before and after his arrest and nearly eight months in custody, have been swept aside in a perfunctory manner to which the Claimant is accustomed since first settling in south Wales in 1992.

37. The arrest and detention of the Claimant were unlawful.

38. There were no reasonable grounds to believe that the Claimant was probably guiltv of the offence for which he was arrested. 39. The decisions to arrest and detain the Claimant were such as no reasonable police officer would have reached.

40. The Claimant was detained for longer than was reasonably necessary and in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

41. Further, the actions of police officers set out above constitute harassment within meaning of section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and misfeasance in public office.

42. Unless restrained by the Court police officers will continue to harass the Claimant.
43. By reason of the matters aforesaid, the Claimant has suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety, damage to his reputation and was deprived of his liberty. He has been subjected to bullying, malicious prosecution and harassment, false imprisonment and contrary to the 1998 Human Rights Act.

44. The Plaintiff therefore claims of the Defendant:- Damages Exemplary damages Special Damages. Costs. In pursuant of Sections of the County Court Act 1984.

45. The Claimant retains his right for a lawyer to amend this Claim.

South Wales Police sued for One Million Euros for Falsifying Machine Gun and Medical Evidence

Maurice — Thu, 26 May 2011 17:14:00 GMT

STOP PRESS

Welsh Court of Appeal Lost!

25% of original Damages Claim Struck Out....the highly sensitve political ones (see December 2010 site video)

'C'est un judgment bizarre', a Breton would say!

Immediate Thoughts on Receipt of 17^th May 2011 Court of Appeal Judgment, BELOW, Refusing Application to Appeal

A. Upon reading the judgment, who wrote it? Defendant's solictors?

B. Someone was back in London by the time the trial judge, HHJSeys LLewelyn QC, read the 'first' reasons realising the visiting judge had not addressed the main issues in dispute, namely, an exeptional case of bullying needing to be consolidated with stayed 4th ,5th , 6th Actions, including the new machine gun case, BELOW, referred to, extensively, in the Claimant's pleadings here LINK SKM

C. Who, then, wrote the 'second' reasons, as if an after thought explaining, maybe, why Cardiff court held back the decision, from the Claimant, for nine days?

D. Clearly, just using the 'struck out' list, below, as examples for the oral appeal shortly (London ), [ALL INVITED, DINNER, as usual, ON ME], is it blatently obvious either MR JUSTICE KITCHIN is also being bullied by 'HM Partnership' or was he never given the facts, on appeal, of the forty odd incidents listed in the first three Actions? With Cardiff manager's track record nothing would surprise me.
There can only be one truth - no matter whose hands it's in...
Maurice J Kirk

1. Stolen Cheques

The thief was identified by the Claimant in Barry Post Office during 2010 Claimant's Application to HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC, in the Lower court, for Permission to Appeal. Both the court and police were informed of his whereabouts, by the Claimant but the Defendant again refused to investigate when his address was traceable from the post office. And a High Court judge now says the South Wales Police have no 'duty'!......With over a hundred incidents of this type of wicked conduct, within the seven or so Actions! Just how many does it take for a policeman to be culpable?

Mr Kitchin knows, to amalgamate cases further risks prison for high ranking South Wales Police.

That's HM Partnership's real 'Reasons' for yet another typical example in our British courts in 'meltdown', not to be published in newspapers.

'Struck Out' due to 'Collateral Attack' on a conviction obtained during an incident

2. Police Caught on Overhead Roadside Video [See it on video Gallery, 5th one back]

Despite police refusing to disclose videos of Claimant being 'beaten up' in Cardiff police cells, the original magistrates and Cardiff Crown Court were not even being allowed to see the overhead road side video because police withheld its disclosure until a year too late.

[The police cell videos were doctored, blanking out the top half of film to hide police identity]

Now the Appeal Court judge did not view the video either! Mr Kitchin undoubtedly argues 'police beating up their prisoners' is 'not relevant' because the terrified Claimant stupidly should not have pleaded guilty to trivial motoring offence thereby giving the bullying police immunity Immunity against any of their conduct throuout the incident...scarry or not scarry??

Roadside Video [5th back on this website video gallery] catches Cardiff police 'beating up' the Claimant after being dragged out of his car. This was before he was even arrested for ‘failure to give road side breath test' having just been followed directly from the Cardiff Crown Court where he and his secretary had been all morning complaining to the then, Recorder of Cardiff, Mr Justice Roderick Evans, about nine years of excessive South Wales Police bullying and proving police documents had been forged (see next incident).

3. Alleged Breach of the Peace at Vale Glamorgan Show

Another, 'Struck out' due to collateral attack on a conviction that, this time, never happened !!! The Claimant was never even charged (four versions of withheld BOP as Cla imant'sexhibits), jailed but never convicted. Bridgend Clerk of the Court, many months later, persuaded police, over lunch, to withdraw the alleged BOP offence, part way through a trial of other charges, quite unrelated, another time, another place, because the Claimant would obviously plead 'not guilty' and would have to go to prison due to common law!

Liar. Just as at the first hearing, in Barry, the Claimant was not told of what the female prosecutor or clerk had before them, witnessed by Claimant's secretary. It was BOP in three different forms!!!!!

The Claimant 'made it worth someone's while' to extract from Bridgend Magistrates records the original clerk's notes (exhibit) confirming scandalous conduct

4. 'Struck Out' due to 'collateral attack' in Claimant's absence from court due to in hospital after motor bike accident!

Veterinary nurse, planted in back of court, signed a sworn affidavit after hearing police stating:

"He drives around in his little white sports car quoting human rights...we are going to get the b'stard".

A trivial motoring conviction should not be the excuse for a High Court judge to protect the bullies breaking UK law.

5 The Defence's Hunter Case Law argument was quite inappropriate for such an unusual, extreme and excessive bullying case with more than one hundred incidents in the six or seven Particulars of Claim. Just how many incidents of police bullying does it take to remove their devine right not to investigate but allowed to cause physical injury, time and time again?

6. Defendant's ‘Mindset' not relevant?!!!!!! Has this High Court judge ever been confronted with such extreme acts of criminal conduct by police?. Of course not but the 'Maurices' of this world who dare question 'authority' are expendable SEE the injury list IN 'VICTIMS UNITE' blogs..

See 26^th May 2011 Machine Gun Particulars of Claim [ below] including False Psychiatric records all fabricated to obtain a false imprisonment designed to interfere with these very civil proceedings. Of course Mr Kitchin avoided the issue, that was his brief.

7. South Wales Police's, ‘Operation Orchid', at the same time, putting the fear of God into my wife when they threatened to have Social Services snatch our 10 year old daughter away has caused quite unforseen repercussions.

Etc, etc.

Mr Kitchin clearly does not realise anarchy is only just around the corner, in Wales and possibly, elsewhere, headed by those who know just where and when to strike, if the break down of law and order in our appalling law courts, driven by avarice, is not sorted out RIGHT NOW.

MACHINE GUN CASE

Once again it is the K Team that has to draft the court papers as no lawyer has been found after a 15 months trawl through solicitors's offices. It is of no surprise to me when you consider Dr Tegwyn Williams was given 'carte blanche' to falsify medical reports for 10, no less, Cardiff judges all knowing, full well, they were untrue but refusing bail due some higher sinister authority. Only one Welsh newspaper, The Glamorgan Gem, published a few of the appalling facts of dishonesty thoughout the Welsh judiciary in this case. If had not been for this web site, publishing day by day accounts of the trial, I would still be in jail due to that HM Partnership lot headed by Nicholarse Cooke QC, The Recorder of Cardiff.

There only remains outstanding which quick act of retribution is appropriate for the likes of Dr Tegwyn Williams as he, unlike Barbara Wilding, is not afforded the luxury of an armed guard. A Welsh court process? What a joke! That is pretty pointless considering our watching the Welsh NHS leave him loose to do it all over again on some unsuspecting individual with less luck.

Common Purpose and Law Society intend to wipe out jury trails and lay magistrates the very two facets of my machine gun case that shone through as the back bone of what we should be proud of. When the two systems are finally snuffed out by HMCS last one switch off the lights, please.

Court of Appeal Judgment by the Honourable Mr Justice Kitchin

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

Reasons:

An appeal has no real prospect of
success.

ln a long and careful judgment of 30
November 2010 the judge addressed the application by the defendant to strike
out the claimant's claims in respect of a number of incidents

ln particular

ln action CF04141, the judge struck
out an allegation in respect of the theft of cheques in that, as a matter of
law, the defendant did not owe the claimant a privately actionable duty of
care.

In actions BS614159-MC65, CF101741 and
CF204141, the judge struck out a series of allegations as being an abuse of
process in that they amounted to collateral attacks on criminal convictions of
the defendant or on conclusive findings which have been made against him in
other proceedings.

The claimant now seeks permission to
appeal on a number of grounds. There is nothing in any of them.

First the claimant contends that
the proceedings took place without him being able to take part. This was
plainly not the case. The judge explained in detail in paragraphs 3 and 4 of
his judgment the careful steps he took to ensure that the claimant was not in
any way disadvantaged and referred in paragraphs 3 to 6 to the extensive
submissions from the claimant which he considered.

Second, the claimant says he was
subjected to unfair pressure from the court and was unfairly disadvantaged. To
the contrary, it is apparent from the paragraphs of the judgment to which I
have referred that the judge took all reasonable steps to ensure the claimant
was not subjected to unfair pressure, nor disadvantaged.

Third, the claimant submits the
court wrongly excluded evidence. I reject this contention. There was no
material dispute of fact in relation to any of the allegations the judge struck
out.

Fourth, it is said the judge
failed to address key submissions. I do not accept this is so. The judge set
out the claimant's case on each issue very clearly. Indeed the judge accepted a
number of the claimant's submissions in refusing to strike out aspects of his
case.

Fifth, the claimant contends the
judge erred in law. In my judgment the defendant has not identified any proper
ground in support of this allegation. The judge correctly identified the
principle established in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and
his application of that principle to the facts alleged by the claimant cannot
be faulted. The other claims were struck out upon the application of the well
established principle that it is not permissible for a claimant to bring a
claim which amounts to collateral attack on an earlier criminal conviction or a
conclusive finding made against him in earlier proceedings.

Finally, the claimant asserts that
the judge failed to protect the claimant against the defendant's mindset. This
provides no basis for an appeal against the specific findings of the judge.

For all these reasons the judge was
also right to refuse permission to appeal.

Reasons

This is a case management order. The
judge declined to order all the cases to be consolidated. This was a perfectly
reasonable decision, particularly since the cases are already being heard
together.

There is no need for the cases to be
transferred to the High Court. Nor has any justification been shown for having
them transferred out of Wa1es.

An appeal has no real prospect of success.

17^th May 2011

Reply to Refusal

Dear Ms Pahl,

Please Forward, in your usual reliable way

31st May 2011

Kirk v South Wales Police

Appeal at Court of Appeal No.s CF029/2011a & CF030/2011a
( May 2011 court letter contains variations in case numbers)

FAO Clerk of the Court,

Further to the predicted refusal notice, based on politics and not facts, received on Saturday, 28th May, I apply for an oral hearing and be permitted witnesses to the facts, before the court, to attend without fear of intimidation.

I also apply that it take place not before but on the 15th June or onwards, in London, but not 28th June as it clashes with another court and an equally scandalous bit of Welsh bloody nonsense.

I also have medical appointments in both France and Londoin to entwine with dates already fixed.

If the hearing is in South Wales I run a very real risk of being falsly arrested again and finish up in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, as was attempted last time, following deliberate falsification of both Welsh HM CPS information and Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric reports.

Last time, following the Welsh filth and their usual tactics, being completely ignored or actively supported by 10 Welsh judges, Welsh HM Court Service and Welsh National Health Service, my liberty, without an appeal, now comes secondary in priority, following revenge, the latter, set for the rest of my short life, to be sufficient to educate the whole world, by exposing your evil Welsh judiciary, driven by greed.

Oh, if only I had listend to both my mother and father about the truth of South Wales, following their shock, in 1992, that I had bought a veterinary practice near Cardiff.

Yours,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Puits aux Papillons

St Doha

22230 Merdrignac

France

0033624571548

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

IN THE CARDIFF COURT

Maurice Kirk Claimant

Chief Constable of South Wales Police Defendant

Particulars of Claim

1. The Defendant was at all material times the chief officer of the South Wales Constabulary and the police officers hereinafter referred to were at all material times acting under the direction and control of the Defendant in the performance or purported performance of their functiion

2. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft by the Claimant's old friend, Mr Viv Bellamy

3. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 replica aeroplane and ‘gun' from a prosecution witness with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' s an integral part of the fuselage and therefore exempt under the 1968 Fire rms Act.

4. 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This became the critical argument in the trial but blocked throughout the twelve days of roceedings of utter nonsense.

5. 2000: The DH2 with the same Lewis antique was flown by the Claimant at the Farnborough Air Show by invitation of another old friend of the Claimant, Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame.

6. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' mounted.

7. 2007: he DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out, by the Royal Air Force, to a civilian for further repair in Hampshire also aware it was decommissioned.

8. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and ‘gun' to another display pilot, a prosecution witness, who ‘modified' the gun for his own purposes.

9. On or about 25^th February 2009 the Defendant signed a sworn affidavit knowing it to be or ought to have known it to be, false, in that paragraphs, between14 to 21, contained erroneous information, namely, incidents, involving both the Defendant and Claimant had ppeared to never have occurred. Police court cases had occurred and the Defendant's attendance, in force, with the use of a crow bar and sledge hammer, to enter the Claimant's Cardiff veterinary surgery, had also occurred. This amounts at least to misfeasance in public office.

10. Following the 2008 Court Order by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, for the Defendant to sign an affidavit that full disclosure of evidence, under the Defendant's control, had been disclosed to the Claimant, the latter entered the Defendants solicitor's' offices, on or about the 25^th February 2009 complaining the Court Order had still not been carried out.

11. The Claimant, upon receipt of a copy of the Defendant's affidavit then entered Barry Police Station and was both videoed and interviewed at length following his complaint that the Chief Constable had knowingly signed a false affidavit to avoid disclosure of evidence relevant to the nineteen year running covert police surveillance and civil actions for damages, referred to in CF101741 + four others.

12. The sale and subsequent management change of the Claimant's South Wales veterinary practice, in May 2009, allowed the Claimant to reveal, at last, on U Tube and websites worldwide the conduct of the South Wales Police with their covert surveillance team that had operated for well over ten years. The Claimant's 64 page June 09 witness statement, summarising their unusual and extreme behavior, was now being prepared for court.

13. On 1^st June 2009 the Defendant caused the Claimant to be subjected to a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) enquiry following a meeting, at the South Wales Police Head Quarters, Bridgend, by the Independent Advisory Group (IAG).

14. On 8^th June 2009, at Barry police station MAPPA meeting, police informed the agencies, present, including staff from Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison, that the Claimant was a category level 3, very dangerous and was to be arrested and ‘taken into custody' for being in possession of a prohibited weapon, a machine gun.

15. The police also informed the agencies that should the Claimant approach the Chief Constable then he was likely to be shot which has caused the Claimant to seek asylum in France for fear of his life

16. On 15^th June 2009 the Claimant brought further civil proceedings, in the Administrative Court, London, against the Defendant and Co-Defendant, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons relating to covert police surveillance. Covert plain clothed police officers were already in attendance.

17. On 18^th June 2009 the Claimant again laid the complaint, this time inside the offices of the Defendant's Bridgend South Wales Police head quarters where again there was refusal, by the Defendant, to ‘mutually exchange
witness statements' ordered by HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC

18. On 19^th June 2009 the Defendant again refused to exchange witness statements when the Defendant's solicitors, Dolmans, were contacted by the Claimant despite the Court Order having given the Defendant until 4pm.that day

19. On 20^thJune 2009 the Defendant's solicitors laid complaint with their client, against the Claimant, to be arrested for a ‘threat of criminal damage' which amounts to more bullying and harassment.

20. On 21^st June 2009 police Operations, ‘Orchid' and ‘Chalice, caused' a sizeable force of police officers to surround the Claimant's home, in St Donats, Vale of Glamorgan, requiring an armed response unit, a police helicopter and both forensic psychiatrists and a lay advisor for the Claimant to be in attendance. The operation was aborted once the Claimant was seen drinking tea with his family in their front garden.

21. On 22^nd June 2009 24/7 police surveillance caused the Claimant to be arrested in the road outside his property and cautioning him from a written script, following legal advise, that he had been arrested for:

a. Threat of committing criminal damage

b. Being in possession of a prohibited weapon

c. Being in possession of prohibited ammunition

22. ‘Operation Orchid' caused a second team of South Wales Police to interview the Claimant's wife at the family home, with the hope they could obtain a statement from her that the Claimant had a history of mental illness. This was in the hope of avoiding the criminal proceedings being put to strict proof. The Claimant's wife was threatened that her and Claimant's ten years old daughter was at serious risk of being taken into care, by the South Wales social services, if she did not cooperate. Blatant intimidation and harassment of the Claimant and his family.

23. The Claimant was never charged with the first arrest allegation, (a), and despite repeated court orders to reveal the evidence and statements by Dolmans, solicitors, they assisted their client by being a party to the February 2009 Chief Constable's sworn affidavit.

24. Despite repeated applications in Cardiff Crown Court, by the Claimant, for specific disclosure relating to the alleged ‘threat of criminal damage' to countless judges, HM Crown Prosecution Service, South Wales Police and Dolmans, the Defendant's solicitors, being the complainant, all refused.

25. Final proof of conspiracy needed just one last refused application, this time before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, the management judge in the ongoing civil proceedings between the Claimant and Defendant.

26. Dolmans had little choice but to again refuse to disclose the evidence of their client's criminal conduct and/or gross mismanagement during the days leading up to the Claimant's 22^nd June 2009 ridiculous arrest

27. Dolmans falsified evidence assisting in the arrest of the Claimant, their client, the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Ms Barbara Wilding, the latter assuring them, no doubt, of their immunity to prosecution. The overall plan was to prejudice the Claimant's position in the ongoing civil proceedings now that the ‘cover up' of an expensive ten year police covert surveillance team, on the Claimant, was starting to fall apart.

28. There was no intention of arresting the Claimant on fire arms charges. The Claimant, without full MAPPA approval or understanding, had been set up to be ‘lawfully killed' by an armed South Wales Police unit under direct orders from senior police officers.

29. Events following the early 2009 decision by these high ranking police officers, to have the Claimant eliminated, eventually became unmanageable due to the unpredictable conduct of their moving target and the effect of his postings on his website.

30. Between 22^nd and 23^rd June 2009 the police filmed and removed, from his home, the Claimant's lawfully held shot guns, ammunition and court files, the latter relating to the Claimant's ongoing complaint of police bullying, harassment, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments conducted in most un usual and extreme
manner suggesting vengeance at the tax payer's expense

31. None of the above items, guns, ammunition or court files have ever been returned to the Claimant with the police continuing to block the Claimant's right to re new his gun licences.

32. On 24^th June 2009 a police officer or officers laid information against the Claimant at Barry Magistrates court alleging that that the Claimant had been ‘in possession of a prohibited weapon', one antique 1916 Lewis machine gun and had sold the ‘gun', a year earlier, both contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act

33. The English police refused to ‘touch the subject with a barge pole' once they became aware that the South Wales Police had persuaded the Civil Aviation Authority to telephone ahead to the new owner, in England, to dismount the Lewis antique and alone drive it across Lincolnshire and beyond to find any licenced arms dealer where it could be, later, collected by the Defendant.

34. The Welsh police then ‘hawked' the Lewis antique nearly two thousand miles around the UK, contrary to strict Home Office Regulations, during which time the Defendant had it ‘modified' at their special police laboratory in South Wales. This Claim is yet another one of misfeasance in public office.

35. Upon reading the Claimant's June 2009 64 page Defence statement, on the Defendant's real motives behind his arrest, the Barry Magistrates court, together with legal advice, allowed the Claimant immediate and unconditional bail.

36. On 25^th June 2009 the police appealed the Court Order deliberately lying on the relevant facts, under consideration, to HHJ Hughes causing the Claimant to be further detained in custody in Cardiff prison.

37. Repeat of these lies by the Defendant occurred before a further nine more Cardiff Crown Court judges when opposing bail. False antecedent history together with this malicious false imprisonment is one of the major Claims of the Claimant.

38. The Defendant, over nearly eight months, deliberately refused the Claimant standard or specific disclosure of evidence, under their control, that would have cleared the Claimant's name before the need of a trial. Defamation is another serious Claim by the Claimant.

39. In July 2009 the Defendant brought a third indictment namely, obtaining income from the ‘proceeds of crime'. A judge, much later, caused this third indictment to be withdrawn. This event contributes to the large number of proceedings that the Claimant has won against the Defendant.

40. On 3^rd August 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams, forensic psychiatrist and Director of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police forensic Unit, at Bridgend, signed a psychiatric report recommending the Claimant be sectioned and further remanded in custody to his medium secure psychiatric unit, Caswell Clinic, under Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act having not even examined his patient

41. Dr Teqwyn Williams had in his possession, before 3^rd August 2009, psychiatric reports from both HM Prison Cardiff and his own Caswell Clinic doctors, that the Claimant did not need any medication or treatment relevant to the 1983 Mental Health Act.

42. On 28^thAugust 2009 a series of brain scans, arranged by Dr Tegwyn Williams, indicated no relevant abnormalities in the Claimant, confirmed at the time, in writing, by at least one expert at the Princess Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgend.

43. In September 2009, after it was clear the Claimant was not going to employ a lawyer, with sworn allegiance to the South Wales courts, Dr Tegwyn Williams recommended that the Claimant be now transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison (IPP), Imprisonment for Public Protection with a term of imprisonment, without trail, of an inordinate length stating, without appropriate qualifications, the Claimant had ‘significant brain damage' and ‘possible cancer', neither of which had much chance of recovery.

44. Whilst this Claim could be conceived against Dr Tegwyn Williams alone, it is concluded here as a major act of harassment by the Defendant who had commissioned Dr Williams via FTAC and MAPPA.

45. The Claimant, following much needed legal advice retains the right of including Dr Tegwyn Williams as a Co-Defendant in these civil proceedings for damages.

46. On or about the 24^th October 2009 the Claimant was further remanded in custody in Cardiff Prison reliant on a further Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric report the Defendant knew or ought to have known was false as the National Health Service doctor was not even qualified to sign such a court document as true, to the best of his belief.

47. On the 2nd December 2009 the prosecution had convened a hearing, not tape recorded and in the absence of the Claimant, left locked up under the court, to discuss, at length, with the proposed trial judge and Dr Tegwyn Williams, the possibilities of avoiding the trial by way of a Section 41 or similar, of the 1983 Mental Health Act, that could have the Claimant locked away, without trial, for life.

48. But the Defendant had failed to obtain the second signatory from any appropriately qualified forensic psychiatrist, required by law, in either England or Wales, but not for the want of trying.

49. On the 2^nd December 2009 The Defendant failed to inform the proposed trial judge, HHJ Bidder QC, that the Claimant had caused not less than twelve psychiatric reports from a same number of psychiatrists that the Claimant was not requiring the need for either psychiatric assessment or treatment.

50. HM Court Service (Wales), as is their habit, failed to disclose to HHJ Bidder QC or the Claimant of the Claimant's privately obtained expert medical report, from outside Wales, having been served on Cardiff Crown Court the day before by an English solicitor and past MP for the Vale of Glamorgan.

51. The report seriously contradicted both those of Dr Tegwyn Williams' and the findings of Professor Roger Wood, the latter also unqualified to state an opinion that might affect permanent custody of the Claimant

52. On 7^tt December 2009 the Claimant, using other lawyers, again from well outside South Wales, caused the MAPPA coordinator, based at the Defendant's HQ, to indicate, in writing, ‘ The right arm did not know what the left arm of the law was doing'

53. On 17^th December 2009 the Defendant headed a hurriedly convened MAPPA meeting in the Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, due to yet another Claimant bail Application before HHJ Bidder QC scheduled that day in Newport Crown Court.

54. The Claimant's name for some reason, currently subject to HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC's outstanding Order for disclosure, was removed from the MAPPA register without any explanation to the Claimant causing further hardship and distress to the Claimant, in prison, still trying to establish his exact MAPPA status and why, just a before trial carrying a possible mandatory ten year prison sentence.

55. The Claimant has to this day never established why and later, why not, he was on the MAPPA register with the Defendant repeatedly refusing to disclose, contrary to law.

56. Defense evidence or ‘summing up' was never needed due the prosecution's fairy tale, a view held by at least nine members of the jury, stating to the Claimant, immediately after the trial, that their decision was already concluded by eleven of the jury after the first day of evidence and cross examination

57. On 9^th February 2010, at Cardiff Crown Court, the Claimant was found ‘not guilty' on the two remaining indictments and was released from custody with no conditions.

58. The jury also made the Claimant aware, immediately after the hearing, that they questioned why both the original seller to the Claimant, of the Lewis antique and the current owner, buying from the Claimant, were not also in the dock or behind bars.

59. The Claimant's complaints to the relevant police authorities, to investigate the conduct within South Wales Police, before and after his arrest and nearly eight months in custody, have been swept under the proverbial carpet in a perfunctory manner to which the Claimant is accustomed since first settling in South Wales.

60. The arrest and detention and prosecution of the Claimant were unlawful as the most appalling act of malice.

61. There were no reasonable grounds to believe that the Claimant was probably guilty of the offence for which he was arrested.

62. The decisions to arrest and detain the Claimant were such as no reasonable police officer would have reached.

63. The Claimant was detained for longer than was reasonably necessary and in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

64. Further, the actions of police officers set out above constitute harassment within meaning of section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and misfeasance in public office.

65. By reason of the matters aforesaid, the Claimant has suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety, damage to his reputation and was deprived of his liberty. He has been subjected to bullying, malicious prosecution and harassment, false imprisonment and contrary to the 1998 Human Rights Act.

Withheld NHS Medical Records

66. On or about 10^th February 2010 the Defendant arrested and detained in custody the Claimant for entering Caswell Clinic, when invited by the staff to collect his full medical records, promised by Dr Tegwyn Williams following the Claimant's applications under the Freedom of Information and Data Protection Acts. Also promises to his GP's secretary, in the presence of the Claimant, by the manager, stated they could be collected from the Caswell Clinic porter's lodge. His multi agency collusion has caused serious aggravation to the Claimant's health

67. The full medical records were not disclosed and currently remain with the South Wales National Health Service, also now refusing to hand them over.

68. The Claimant was charged with numerous allegations and jailed. Severe bail conditions were set before all charges were later dropped with the Defendant refusing to properly investigate the Claimant's complaint into the apparent falsified medical records written by both Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic and Professor Roger Wood of Swansea University

69. The Defendant's actions were both malicious and bullying and/or yet a further example of misfeasance in public office the Claimant has suffered under, by the Defendant, since 1992

HM Court Service (Wales).

70. In July 2010 ex South Wales Police officer, a Derrick Hassan, violently assaulted the Claimant, dependant at the time on a pair of crutches and on daily morphine sulphate and other analgesic medication. Hassan pushed the Claimant part way down a flight of stairs in Cardiff Crown Court causing the Claimant to attend casualty and treatment for a damaged ankle and increased his hip pain in a much overdue total hip replacement required, caused by the failure ofthe Defendant to investigate the Claimant's complaint, relating to falsified medical evidence. The Vale Hospital, Vale of Glamorgan, had to take this into consideration, without clarification being available, to cancel elected surgery.

71. Despite being given the name and address of an independent witness, not part of HM Court Service (Wales), the Defendant refused to have him interviewed thereby acting irresponsibly and with without due care. The conduct was malicious.

Racially Aggravated Public Order allegations

72. 69 On or about the 2^nd August 2010 the Claimant was arrested and jailed by the Defendant purely for monetary gain by a third party. The Crown Prosecution Service offered ‘no evidence' and the Claimant was found ‘not guilty' in his absence of all parties

73. Again, the Defendant refused to investigate thousands of pounds of damage caused, caught in the act by the Claimant, by these same complainants of the dismissed Public Order offences.

74. This malicious prosecution is a further act of both misfeasance in public office and harassment

Stolen Cheques incident currently under appeal at The Court of Appeal

75. On or around November 2010 the Claimant identified the thief of his stolen surgery cheques, some nine years earlier, the subject currently on appeal from Action CF101+ three others, before the Court of Appeal (Wales). The thief was giving his identity details to a named clerk in Barry Post Office. The Defendant, due to ill health and on crutches was unable to apprehend the thief.

76. Previously, the Defendant in the defenses of the earlier Action admitted to the Claimant that the Defendant had not been able to trace the thief despite being, known to the Defendant, given film footage of his cashing falsified Claimant's cheques and given his home address in Barry.

77. The Claimant informed the Defendant of the above new information but the Defendant refused to properly investigate or even speak to the clerk at the Barry Post Office or the Claimant on the new evidence.

78. In summary, the Claimant has suffered from the malicious intent of the Defendant's misfeasance in public office as well as the unprofessional behaviour of the Defendant's solicitors and of the Defendant's forensic psychiatrist. The Defendant's bullying and harassment resulted in false imprisonment, severe damage to reputation, completely unnecessary legal proceedings and thus a claim to damages, exemplary damages, special a criminal investigation and costs.

79. Unless restrained by the Court, police officers will continue to harass the Claimant.

80. The Claimant retains his right for trial by jury and for a lawyer to read and amend this Claim

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Puits aux Papillons
St Doha
22 230 Merdrignac
Bretagne
France

26^th May 2011

Copy to Cardiff Court of Appeal
             Cardiff County Court
             His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC
             The French Immigration Authorities

First Petition to Parliament on Behalf of Victims of White Collar Crime

Maurice — Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:22:00 GMT

The following Petition has been submitted to our new MP for the Vale of Glamorgan, Alun Cairns MP, following a very lively debate at our 25th January 2011 House of Commons meeting with both Members of the House of Lords and House of Commons in attendance, a committee room, I may say, STUFFED with Victims of the banks, HM and our law courts, solicitors and NHS (see photo gallery, other blogs and PDF downloads).

To the House of Commons

The petition of Maurice J Kirk BVSc, a citizen of the UK at 52, Tynewydd Road, Barry CF62 8AZ, declares that he has tried everything in his powers as a former veterinary surgeon to stand up to the harassment of South Wales Police who have delayed his civil action against them.

The citizen has suffered from harassment by South Wales Police that culminated in 7 months imprisonment, including 3 months in a psychiatric clinic, after getting him struck off the Register of Veterinary Surgeons.

One of the incidents in a series of interconnected legal actions was the machine gun case. The allegation was the possession and sale of a ‘gun' even though it was decommissioned and an ‘add on' to an historic aircraft. In the run up to the trial, however, South Wales Police mobilised Multi-Agency Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) hoping to shoot or section the citizen for life. MAPPA categorisation was used for imprisonment which included 3 months in a psychiatric clinic. A leaked MAPPA document, published on his website www.kirkflyingvet.com, shows that the Police had a firearms response.

The harassment included the falsification of medical records claiming that he has serious brain damage, possibly brain cancer, to get him sectioned. This prevented his surgical team from carrying out a hip replacement scheduled for June 2010.

While the citizen won the machine gun case in court, he did not get any costs or compensation for malicious prosecution, false imprisonments and generally the deprivation of his human and professional rights as a veterinary surgeon.

The petitioner therefore requests that the Government steps in as Compensator of Last Resort

Dear Mr Cairns,

The 25th January meeting at the House of Commons was a resounding success with many Members from both Houses, with 'like minds', all in one room! The ever widening divide between the basic rules of justice and the conduct of the South Wales Police, our law courts, Crown Prosecution Service and now, HM Court Service, is really most serious because it is clear there is no accountability for their joint actions.,.

South Wales National Health Service and our Health Minister refuse to hand over my medical records in their current control and with CPS, police, Caswell Clinic, HM Prison, Cardiff, Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood are all refusing to clarify, with my surgeons, my medical history when I was in prison custody meaning still further delay in my much needed hip operation.

When can I next see you, please, either in London or Barry? I have currently obtained asylum in France following the repeated attempts by the South Walers Police to either have me shot or jailed for life so any meeting must be before my witnesses and suitably recorded.

Yours sincerely, .

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Beware of Medico-Legal Collusions – in and out of Court

Maurice — Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:39:00 GMT

Maurice has had to endure soooooooooo much trouble and to think up sooooooooooo many ways of defending himself while trying to live a private and professional life, that it’s hard for him to see the wood for the trees. However, as there are more opportunities for putting court documents together, he also goes over transcripts of past hearings and lo and behold, he makes new discoveries.

Here he puts together the essence of six documents:

1. Four pages of a leaked MAPPA memo that identifies why police deliberately set Maurice up as a target to be shot.

a. This is crucial evidence of the covert surveillance that Maurice suspected but Police had always denied. Maurice thinks he knows why it started on June 8^th, but he still has no idea why it ended on December 18^th.

b. The law says that offenders are entitled to minutes of meetings in which they are being discussed. Maurice has never seen any, and Police have never disclosed any either.

2. The full transcript (22 pages) of the hearing on 2^nd Dec 09 in Cardiff Crown Court, when Maurice was still in prison, fearing he might be sent to Broadmoor for life. The transcript commences at 11.39am. Almost a whole hour was not recorded. Maurice now realises that the reason was that William, the court clerk, had been told not to switch on the tape, while Dr Tegwyn Williams’ latest medical report was discussed, which, of course, he had never seen.

3. Another transcript - of the hearing on 17^th December 09 Newport Crown Court - (25 pages) poses a few interesting questions:

a. Is it the decommissioned machine gun (that Maurice once owned as part of an antique plane) that is dangerous or is it Maurice Kirk who is dangerous?

i. Will he commit ‘further offences’? To own and have sold a firearm where the ones alleged).

ii. Will he interfere with witnesses? (His offer on his website to reward information leading to witnesses made the Police worried.)

iii. Will he fail to surrender, if he is granted bail? (He wasn’t volunteering to report to a police station in Wales as he has suffered their harassment for decades.)

b. What are the considerations, threats and delays regarding his action for civil damages against South Wales Police to be listed for January 25^th 2010? This civil action actually only started on September 7 and is currently being adjourned until November 30.

c. It appears that Maurice could have been granted bail, if he had ‘behaved a bit better’. But it also seems as if he knew that what really mattered to the Judge, the Prosecution and, above all, South Wales Police, was to delay the hearing of his case for civil damages. That’s why, it seems, Judge Bidder apologised to Mr Twomlow, the Prosecutor: “I am very sorry, Mr Twomlow that I couldn’t help”.

d. One day after this hearing, his MAPPA surveillance was stopped.

4. 3^rd November 09 - a 26-page medico-legal assessment by Dr Silva was in favour of Maurice: “not suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or degree that would make detention in hospital appropriate.”

5. 1^st December 09 – a 5-page medical report by Dr Kemp – in favour of Maurice: ”does not show any convincing evidence of abnormality”...

6. Purported first page extract of 18th September 09 Professor Roger Wood medical report only released by NHS in June 2010. The original report, read, at the time by Maurice, inside Caswell Clinic, is being refused disclosure by Dr Ruth Bagshaw, to whom it was addressed.

'HM Partnership' overturn Maurice's £50,000 Judgment, against the HM Prison Governor, Awarded by Trial Judge

Maurice — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 07:38:00 GMT

1. In a well thought out judgment the HM District judge, Master Phillips, ruled Maurice had lost his compensation and was to pay, instead, HM £2,200 in costs but, at least, 'stayed' proceedings for three months due to the claimant's medical problems. Problems that may continue, sine die, until HM hands over his medical records for surgeon and anaesthetist.

2. The whole case had rested on HM Treasury Solicitor's barrister, today, stating no Particulars of Claim for damages, for his 2008 false imprisonment, were ever received by Cardiff prison from the HM Cardiff County Court manager, Neil Pring. Mr Pring is the very same one currently refusing Maurice the right to process his fourteen ongoing directly related court cases, at the public counter, whilst also deliberately bouncing any 'due process' via court e-mail addresses. Remember, Mr Pring, instigated by HM Attorney-General [see leaked HM internal memos], back in 2002/3, had gathered up, now under the HM Treasury Solicitor's specific orders, all of Maurice's past and present court files for Whitehall scrutiny, despite a success rate of 80% in the fifty odd cases. HM judges wanted to ban him from any civil court, either in England or Wales unless he was represented by a lawyer. A rare move purely to certify him as a Vexatious Litigant. Obtaining the services of a trustworthy lawyer had always been the heart of the problem.

3. Maurice insisted he had paid HM, on 20th April 2009, for service on both Defendants, Ms West, the then Governor of Cardiff prison, just days before their 8th June, MAPPA meeting where her probation/prison representative(s) were then sitting around the table, at their cosy Bridgend police HQ with other MAPPA key players, such as senior police and NHS doctor, Tegwyn Williams and Social Services, Elizabeth Paul, both of special South Wales Police forensic unit, Caswell Psychiatric Prison.

4. The 1st Defendant, in this, the 5th Action against police, was the Chief Constable. She had always admitted court service, on 20th April and had immediately proceeded with voluminous defence, by Dolman's solitors, both in court and directly to Maurice, now detained in HM Cardiff prison. He remained there until his 11th February 2010 acquittal for trading in 'prohibited weapons and ammunition' whilst attempting, Dolmans, solicitors, would say, by 'mutual exchange' of witness statements through their front window. Maurice was still a little upset, apparently, as to the way the Chief Constable had continued to deny, by sworn affidavit, any knowledge of some of his successful Barry magistrates cases and of her officers having broken into his surgery, all matters within some hundred or so incident numbered conflicts with the South Wales police.

5. In June 09 Maurice had applied for a Default Judgment, by letter and had the completed HM form returned from prison to the court. Maurice also raised the whole issue before His Honour Judge Seys Llewelyn QC, in July, following HM Prison having refused his presence at an earlier court and earlier, still, before HHJ N Cooke QC on a routine bail application. Both these judges would have known, of course, about Maurice's MAPPA terrorist level 3 status with HM prison monitoring all of Maurice's visitors, telephone calls and letters to and from the County Court and opening his solicitors.

6. At the 8th June MAPPA meeting HM considered it likely that Maurice would be shot when next attempting to 'exchange' witness statements. It was now his seventeenth year in this long running civil action, repeatedly being refused a Trial by Jury originally promised, originating from when Barry police, on 27th November 1992, had first refused to apprehend or even interview the named likely arsonists who had burnt out his garage at his home in Barry.

7. The garage had hangared his WW2 piper cub (not insured) and also full of his and his father's extensive collection of rare veterinary antique books and equipment (see exhibit, in 4th Action and ITV News video). Maurice was, instead, grilled at the police station by the officer in command, as if he had burnt out his cub to claim on insurance. Police harassment, originating from the 70s, in Somerset, was clearly, again, rearing its ugly head.

8. This time, Maurice was not going to just 'move out of the area', as he had always done before, this time he was going to take a stand and fight them, legally represented, through the civil courts.

9. In the 2009 MAPPA minutes, under the control of Nigel Rees, MAPPA Co-ordinator, reveal Maurice received a majority consent for 'special treatment' with Dr Tegwyn Williams allocated the task, by whatever means, to obtain Barbara Wilding's desire for a 'final solution', Maurice's Broadmoor imprisonment, of 'indeterminate length', IPP, having failed in her opportunity, when deliberately delaying Maurice's arrest for a few weeks, in having him shot.

10. Quotes from 8th Oct 2010 County Court Judgment

P 5 para 23 'The evidence of the 2nd Defendant is that they have no record of having received any correspondence from the court for the period April until October 09 in relation to the proceedings issued by Mr Kirk'.......

P5 para 26 'I accept the evidence of Mr Booty (current HM Governor) that the prison had no record of the prison having received any correspondence from the court for the relevant period. I cannot accept that if the proceedings had been served they would simply have been ignored'.

P 5 para 27 'I do not suggest it is necessary (as Mr Kirk suggests) for there to be an affidavit sworn by the previous governor. He or she will simply repeat the procedures in place in dealing and processing of incoming mail at the prison and that aspect is dealt with in detail in Mr Booty's statement'.

11. In around November 09, when Maurice received the £50,000 Judgment pushed under his prison cell door, immediately arranged, by application to HM Governor's representatives for the distribution of tobacco for all hundred odd inmates on his prison wing.

12. While Maurice cannot commence Court of Appeal proceedings, owing to the Order to 'stay' proceedings, he was just been contacted by the court, mid English Channel, too far out to jump off and swim back to Brittany, where he had gone in search of ten year old police custody videos and tapes. These included the one of police smashing their way into his daughter's car to arrest him, whilst stuck in stationary Cardiff traffic and, later, knocking him about in the cell of the police station.

13. Cardiff court told him that the anxiously awaited judgment, scheduled for Monday, 11th October, as to whether MAPPA meetings summaries will be disclosed or not, was now adjourned to possibly, Friday, 15th October.

Racially Aggravated Threat Trial Starts Today

Maurice — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:32:00 GMT

HM Crown Prosecution are still refusing to hand over my Dr Tegwyn Williams medical records, used on the 2nd December 09, to keep me locked up. Now they affect my trial today, in Barry magistrates, see here. All the HM courts are now blocking my e-mails and I have received a letter from HM Partnership stating I am not allowed to enter any civil or criminal court in South Wales at all, without prior written consent.

Well, past invitations to court have never, actually, been a great thrill, but just how else am I expected to do my target practice now? On a machine gun range?

More Blood on the Carpet

Maurice — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:57:00 GMT

Back in Brittany and recovering from a scrumptuous two hour meal in the local Routier restaurant, with many friends, I open my netbook computer, on the table, to pick up my e-mails.... Replies remind me of a few days before I was arrested, last year, for 'trading in machine guns and prohibited ammunition' when I first 'went public', world wide, by video, as to how I had known, for decades, of the expensive covert police servaillance mounted on my private life, following the mysterious disappearance, in 1997, of Taunton's Chief Superintendant, Curly Hawkins'note book from his office in the police station.

That covert surveillance was to follow me to HM Guernsey and now South Wales.

Now there is about to be more 'blood on the carpet' with still further disclosure of MAPPA police records. See this post on the PR blog.

Guy writes as to whether certain police using unlicensed Taisers, recently, will suffer the same fate as I had, incarcerated in a terrifying Welsh psychiatric prison, pending a life sentence without trial?

EXTRACT FROM A FELLOW MAPPA VICTIM's ACCOUNT ON HIS HARROWING EXPERIENCE

Dafydd Morgan from Aberystwyth writes, "Exactly the same scenario is now developing at Cardiff Crown Court, where Maurice Kirk is bringing up matters and instances that South Wales Police and their Dolmans Barristers are getting extremely angry and frustrated, as they have not the first clue as to what Maurice is talking about. This, in reflection to my own case, mirrors the same scenario where the Police and IPCC have gone out of their way to bury our complaints and we have reached the point where Maurice, myself and many others throughout the International community have the paperwork and the Oppressive Authority's haven't - WHY NOT?

Andy Edwards, former provisional Chief Constable of Dyfed Powys Police has deliberately gone out of his way to target Maurice Kirk, Patrick Cullinane, myself and many others under MAPPA surveillance, based on personal revenge and deeply flawed and false Police intelligence. They are acting like four year old children falling out over their toys. There are very few bright bulbs in the Llangunnor and Bridgend boxes. . . ."

MAURICE TOOK THE PROCAUTION, MANY YEARS AGO, OF SERVING, ON DOLMANS, HIS 50 ODD LEAVER ARCHED FILES OF CONTEMPORANEOUS RECORDS FOR EACH AND EVERY POLICE INCIDENT AND SUBSEQUENT CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS, SHOULD THE POLICE EXPERIENCE, AGAIN, A SUDDEN ATTACK OF 'SELECTVE AMNESIA'.

(which is exactly why, Dolmans solicitors, drafting the 25th Feb 2009 Barbara Wilding false 'Sworn Affidavit', deny knowledge of court cases and police veterinary surgery break-ins etc causing Maurice to immediately fear for his life).