Our Standards Snuffed Out Without a Shot Fired?

Maurice — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:54:00 GMT

So just who has the bottle to stop the threat of just so many aliens entering our country?

Bundles for Court of Appeal

Maurice — Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:31:00 GMT

Recovery from rugby win, an exciting one, with St George's flag still stuck onto one of Maurice's crutches, it is now used again to celebrate the almost completion of bundles for Court of Appeal deadline, against the bullying of south Wales police, at the tender cost of 54 Euros for the posting!

Fear of being Shot

Maurice — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:19:00 GMT

Maurice thinks of his old mate, of RAFVR Bristol Air Squadron days who invited him to display his replica DH 2 WW1 fighter biplane, test pilot of 002 Concorde, Brian Trubshaw., at the 2000 Farnborough airshow sporting a WW1 Lewis machine gun! Maurice will sleep much better tonight now he has declared the compelling evidence to the French Authorities.

South Wales Judge throws out Maurice's 18 year Argument of Police Harassment and Deliberate Inaction to Investigate Crime against him and his Family

Maurice — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:43:00 GMT

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC's 30th November 2010 Preliminary Judgment here.

This cannot be understood without

The Claimant's Rebuttal to Strike Out Incidents
his 'schedule' of 41 motoring incidents.

Whilst in Alderney, Channel Islands, Maurice sent this fascinating and highly original letter to Cardiff County Court in which he asks the Judge to reconsider the basis for striking out one of the actions.

Hobbling along memory lane, where Maurice is hugged by old ladies whose dogs and cats he operated on, he's also applied for asylum. According to UN regulation, a refugee is a person who has fled war or OTHER VIOLENCE in their home country.

Having read the 40-page judgment, which needs a response within 7 days (!), one must talk about the adversarial system of law being a kind of legalised violence in itself, especially as “the one great principle of English Law is, to make business for itself…”

As I helped with the first document, I feel like writing

"Your Honour, or Dear Judge, (I know it's not done to write to judges at all...)

As a former computer programmer, my brain is highly trained in logic. This is to suggest that the logic applied in your 152 paragraphs of judgment is biased. Biased towards the Defendant as a "public authority". "Public policy"is used as an excuse for assuming that the Police can't do wrong."

I consider it utterly disgusting that "the Law" is used to split hairs between oodles of incidents that one individual has endured instead of looking at the experiences of the individual as a whole. Typically male and analytical, instead of balanced and holistic, despite the "abundant caution" supposedly exercised.

Here are my observations - for the Court of Public Opinion (website readers instead of a jury):

good resume of Maurice's issues in para 1
the Police's issues in para 2 read questionable to me: "public policy vs no cause of action to an individual", "no privately actionable duty of care", "not entitled to re-open". The rat I smell is about "the establishment never acting on individual cases" while, in my view, society consists of individuals, even if they are employed in organisations pertaining to HM Establishment
the next paras show his "abundant caution" to take into account that Maurice is a litigant in person
paras 4 to 13: the Yorkshire Ripper case and others are cited to defend the Police's absence of "negligence of care" or "privately actionable duty of care" as "public policy" or the "Hill principle"
paras 19 to 29 are grouped under "Duty of Care: the allegations subject to application to Strike Out"
in para 21 you believe that it is NOT the "duty of care" to investigate stolen cheques. I wonder why ex-policeman Albert Burgess writes that it is illegal not to investigate a crime... You feel that malicious intent should have been repeated. Oh dear, what a mistake made by the Claimant Maurice who puts together lots of incidents to prove malicious intent as the underlying attitude...
para 24: what twists between the 'general' and the 'specific': an individual police officer and the Police as a whole to conclude that the stealing of cheques must be struck out. I can only call this logic "interesting" and distinctly NOT taking the full picture into account.
para 26 and 27: "no privately actionable duty of care" to investigate crime. What a twist of argument, I'm sorry to say.
paras 30 to 37 cover Liability of the police as bailee of property and/or in negligence. They claim that the investigation and suppression of crime allows the Police to commit further 'damaging actions'. Nice to know. Is it "just, fair and reasonable" to expect Mr Kirk to write the best arguments in the best style whilst in pain and the side effects of morphine?
"public policy" reasons apply to ALL police forces, but could it not be "organisational policy" to harass a particular targeted individual?
paras 38 to 43 cover Claims alleged to be an abuse of process. Legal principle itself and refer to precedent cases. The most ironic quote is "the one the one great principle of English Law is, to make business for itself…..” LOTS of victims have experienced how true that is!!! Maurice calls it the public gravy train, when the public purse is concerned as when a Police Force is involved...
para 42 quotes: He claims however that bif the right arguments had been used or evidence called, it would have been decided differently.
paras 44 to 52 cover Claims alleged to be an abuse of process. Application of legal principle to the acts alleged by Mr Kirk.
para 53 to 66: Claim in Action 1 – Paragraph 8.12 4th October 1993
para 61: "It is also at the very foundation of this case that Mr Kirk has a burning
sense of injustice about past wrongs. Whether that burning sense of
injustice is based upon real or imaginary fact is of no consequence to
us. ….. Mr Kirk told us in evidence, and I suspect will always believe,
that there is always some form of conspiracy against his interests. It
was a constant theme in his questions to the police constables. He put
to them that each constable knew all about him and that they were
involved in some kind of vendetta or, perhaps cover up of police wrong
doing or, maybe inefficiency."
para 67 to 77: Claim in Action 2 paragraph 3.1- 12th May 1996 - crossing a white line - struck out.
para 78 to 82: Claim in Action 2 paragraph 9 – 1.12.1999 – driving at Llantwit Major - struck out.
para 83 to 86: Action 2 paragraph 11 – 5.4.2000 – driving in Albany Road - .
para 87 to 99; para 114: ... in respect of the other road traffic offences, Mr Kirk is entitled to invite the court to consider a claim for malicious prosecution. I am dealing with whether it would be an abuse of process to pursue them, not with whether they appear to me to be strong or merely “arguable” claims.
para 100 to 114: The video issue: Maurice is entitled to invite the court to consider a claim for malicious prosecution.
para 115 to 131: Action 3 paragraph 2 – 19.8.1998 – Vale of Glamorgan Show.
para 132 to 151: MAPPA documents
para 143 states The Defendant (Police) submits that the Executive Summary itself should not be disclosed to Mr Kirk, on the basis that (i) it is not material to his proceedings and (ii) that it should not be disclosed for reasons of public interest immunity.

Maurice is not alone: Violence by Police, 'poor' service by the CPS and SECTIONING

SabineKMcNeill — Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:35:00 GMT

This BBC news article illustrates the unjustified brutality that South Wales Police got up to in the case of an innocent musician, his partner and child.

The officer who handcuffed Victor Frederick did not come forward and could not be identified...

Here's a story on WalesOnline that reports on an assessment carried out in April. Her Majesty's Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate deemed the body's overall performance as 'poor'.

This covers in performance in pre-charge advice and decision making, preparation and progression in magistrates’ court cases, custody time limits and disclosure was poor. "Disclosure" has become one of Maurice's 'hobby horses'...

And this is the extra-ordinary story of Neil Jones who had details on the Jill Dando murder to offer. After five different charges, he was not only imprisoned, but also 'interviewed' to be sectioned..

High Speed Car Chase through Cardiff

Maurice — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:09:00 GMT

Following a 'Guilty Plea' the Crown Prosecution Service, representing Her Majesty, proceeded to tell the Cardiff Magistrates, the police had mounted a 'high speed car chase' on the 4th April 2000, as I left the morning work in the Cardiff Crown Court before His Honour Roderick Evans QC, Recorder of Cardiff. Video displays what happened next......the custody video is even better when the RCJ, eventually, order its release.....Maurice is not holding his breath.

Search results matching tags 'South Wales Police' and 'violence'