Search results matching tags 'South Wales Police cover-up' and 'Caswell Clinic'

RCJ Critical of Cardiff Crown Court Practices

Maurice — Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:19:00 GMT

http://swarb.co.uk/kirk-regina-on-the-application-of-v-cardiff-crown-court-and-others-admn-21-jan-2015/ ,,,,,,,,, http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/crown-court-breached-open-justice-with-note-taking-ban/5053531 ....................http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/government-agency-forced-intervene-after-reporter-was-barred-taking-notes-magistrates-court-first Malfeasance in a Public Office? Various Welsh Criminal Court Anomalies before The Royal Courts of Justice ................. See also further detail on both MAURICEJOHNKIRK.WORDPRESS.COM & FACE BOOK web sites............ Thomas Crowther (judge) – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia , http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/news/5000624.Barry_s__Flying_Vet__Maurice_Kirk_cleared_of_firearms_charges/ . Still more wheel nuts are coming dangerously loose on HM Partnership’s ‘gravy train’ following today’s Royal Courts of Justice ruling, handed down by Lord Justice Burnett and Mr Justice Sweeney, meaning ‘Code Napoleon’ may be here quicker than you think? . , Blatant denial in Wales, for mere mortals in their public gallery or one of Cardiff’s bullet/sound proof docks, to take notes of evidence on behalf of the police victim, is over. . . This means Her Majesty’s subjects, in Wales now, may shortly also have access to what lawyers have always had – access to hear the court tapes( CDs)-during and after trials. BUT His Lordship distinctly stated that I would continue, for the time being at least, to pay the “modest fee” charged for the transcript and things appeared different in Wales. . . In this particular Judicial Review, my 64th, it cost me over £1,200 which caused an amusing interlude in such a bizarre environment when finding myself opposing an ex Taunton School prefect, Mr Douglas-Jones QC, the CPS barrister for the Welsh Police, no less, despite being already ‘dead in the water’ fighting, rather well, a rear guard action of opposing my return of my transcript fees when reliant on undisclosed evidence of my apparent ‘conduct’ in the court below. . . Having been refused the right to apply for legal aid, eye witnesses, disclosure of custody records, the three prison officers who saw me arrest Mr Rogan in Cardiff prison, for withholding my passport on police orders, copy from any one of the seven CCTV cameras also recording the very hilarious event, my ‘conduct’ in the court below was just routine. . . I Cardiff criminal courts you are invariably denied your legal papers in the court room and if a prisoner you are not even allowed to take them off the prison wing. . . That day, in Cardiff’s Crown Court, before HHJ Crowther QC, I could neither see nor hear much of what was going as my hearing aid had been pinched from my cell, my glasses secreted in in my legal papers, at the foot of the court stairs, hoping to get at the file and compounded by the discomfort from temporary haemorrhoids caused by so much legal data having to be regularly stuffed up my rectum. . . I was was quickly stopped, more than once, by Their Lordships from enquiring as to what evidence of so called prisoner ‘conduct’ did the CPS refer and by whom did this HM barrister obtain such allegations if not from the South Wales Police? A touch of the re run, I thought, of Downing Street’s HM Privy Council/ RCVS Deja vu? This will be the next HM ‘cosey relationship’ within our South Wales Police/HM Judges/HM Crown Prosecution Service/HM Court and Tribunal Service needing to be quashed AND maybe, without even the need to cross the Severn Bridge! 16 02 04 RCJ note jugment 16 02 08 note taking CO042492014-Final Order His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, in my protracted actions against the South Wales Police for over 20 years of malicious prosecutions, has granted time for the production of further evidence of: An over arching course of conduct of police misfeasance in a public office My right in exposing Barbara Wilding’s ‘shoot to kill’ intention, following her clandestine 8th June 2009 Barry police station’s meeting, to have me registered MAPPA level 3 category 3, has been thwarted by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC this week. The MAPPA meeting had consisted only of senior police management and her chief forensic psychiatrist, Dr Tegwyn Williams, with his psychiatric nurse, Ms Elizabeth Paul both of Caswell Clinic’s medium secure psychiatric unit housed in Glanrhydd Hospital, Bridgend, South Wales. The then Chief Constable had blackmailed Dr Tegwyn Williams to concoct NHS (Wales) medical reports to have her adversary in court, claiming damages, to be locked away, hopefully indefinitely, in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital without any need for the ‘machine gun’ trial. '' . . WANTED Dr Tegwyn Williams WANTED poster ' ' Machine Gun Case one page summary ' . 14 01 23 HMP Swansea Brain Scan . . No evidence of Dr Tegwyn William s diagnosis of ‘significant brain damage’ or Crown Prosecutor Richard Thomlow’s pleading for MAPPA 3/3 victim be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Hospital, with possible brain tumour, indefinitely. . . Mr Thomlow is now a Welsh judge, incidentally, which must signify the obvious while Dr Tegwyn Williams was sacked from the NHS for what he has done and now down in Christchurch, New Zealand, I last heard. . . .I have personal experiences of NZ police, in my jaunt around that great place, in Liberty Girl, that lost more per capita than any other HM King George Country in WW2, …..Yes, I was stopped by NZ police for various mischievous allegations, BUT always with a smile! I wish Dr TW and wife well as they will not be black-mailed by that police force, for sure This then flurry of mine, of futile activity ‘with authority’, was entirely my mistake on the huge assumption I would get their help, after Barbara Wilding had to falsify a court affidavit confirming FULL DISCLOSURE had been completed: MG Trigger MAPPA Restricted.

Another Frustrating Day in our Parliament Building

Maurice — Wed, 24 Jun 2015 06:13:00 GMT

Busy day for me, yesterday, in Parliament committee rooms- First there was 'child abuse' meeting and then 'whistle blower' almost a riot of over a hundred fearful followers and victims as persecuted 'whistle blowers'. Then, if not sublime to the ridiculous, in the very same room was NOMS with entourage including the new Justice Minister, Mr Michael Gove.......the discussion covered lawyer greed , would you believe? . . No Sabine K McNeil there, alas, of Victims Unite.com.etc . So, what are you lot out there going to do about her current predicament as the 'Queen Bee' on so many disputed issues in our current out dated UK judicial system?.. , BUT first we had an organised demo outside that building, Royal Courts of Justice, for Sabine, one of the original brains at Cern in the 70s who created that nebulous thing none of you can touch....cyberspace. SO, what are you going to do? . Sabine K McNeill (@SabineMcNeill) | Twitter . See More later

Outstanding Criminal Allegations to be Withdrawn to avoid Statutory Disclosure of Police Conspiracy Evidence 10am Cardiff Crown Court

Maurice — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:19:00 GMT

Applications today will be made for the transfer of all my outstanding court cases to be properly heard well out of South Wales, it being exactly what the Crown Prosecution (Wales) have done with me, in the past, when the 'truth' is even too embarrassing for that 'shower' of reject attorneys to stomach. (ex police officer Derrick Hasan, working for HMC&TS Welsh manager, Luigi Stranati, pushed me down a flight of Cardiff Crown court steps to break my leg).

All welcome , lunch on me as usual.

T2013 0801

CF 614159

Claimant’s Applications to the Recorder of Cardiff include:

1. Chief Constable Peter Vaughan to immediately return the Claimant’s passport

2. HM Cardiff prison to immediately release The Claimant’s confiscated legal papers and clothes required for both his civil and criminal outstanding litigation

3. Her Majesty' Crown Court representative, the Crown Prosecution Service (Wales), to immediately disclose both past and present depositions levelled against The Claimant and ordered by Her Honour Eleri Rees

4. The Claimant be allowed immediate access to his GP

5. The Claimant be promised clarification, within seven days, as to why he is still a registered NHS (Wales) mental health patient of Caswell Clinic but refused a follow-up clinical examination and brain scan

6. The Claimant be promised, within seven days, disclosure from both HM Judge Thomolow and Caswell Clinic's Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams previously undisclosed evidence that The Claimant has 'significant brain damage' and cancer sufficient to prevent The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons allowing him to practise veterinary surgery, The Civil Aviation Authority in renewing his professional pilot's licences and for their MAPPA level 3 victim be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Hospital for life

7. The Claimant be allowed all civil and criminal Cardiff cases to be, within seven days, transferred to any other courts within their jurisdiction but not in South Wales

8. The Claimant be immediately granted court protection from the continuing criminal conduct and threats to his life by still some within the South Wales Police

9. The Claimant be immediately granted unfettered Legal Aid and access to a lawyer independent of the notorious Cardiff Cabal

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

17^th September 2013

Previous examples of withdrawn indictable offences to avoid disclosure of 'evidence' and the jury's scrutiny

1. The 'Dangerous Driving' Trial when a Barry police inspector was caught 'red handed ' by the jury, no less, constantly signalling to his colleague under cross examination

2. Last summer's 'Breach of Restraining Order' Trial to avoid, again, Caswell Clinic doctors' original conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice by stating I have 'significant brain damage' with possible cancer and now blocking all local area NHS (Wales) GPs or permitting a follow up brain scan for fear of risking their own bank balances

ANOTHER RING LEADER within a culture of inherent deceit driven by avarice

http://www.aberdareonline.co.uk/content/new-chief-constable-south-wales-police-0

Nothing New Under the Sun,

where the South Wales Police is Concerned!

Yesterday’s Recorder of Cardiff Crown Court hearing was squeezed in between Her Ladyship’s heavy and far more serious agenda than Chief Constable’s Peter Vaughan’s oh so predictable continuing harassment of one of their too fast ageing victim.

Since his predecessor, Barbara Wilding, signed her Dolmans solicitor’s fabricated affidavit, to hide what triggered or contributed to extreme bullying, the incident of her Chief Inspector Brian Genner’s daughter’s miscarriage all blamed on me, police HQ’s conduct lately has worsened.

The changing of the machine gun’s paintwork , just to try and fool the jury, may be one out standing incident for Peter Vaughan to now address or Cardiff Cabal’s refusal to even return all my lawfully held antique guns, to the value of £10,000, confiscated purely out of shear spite, may be another but while the stay on all ‘Kirk v South Wales Police’ is in place for, so far 99 witnesses having given evidence, this current ratchetting up of their multi facetted conspiracy will show us all, at least, ‘just what really goes on in our UK law courts’.

Yesterday, for example, if you get in to the public gallery it is designed that you hear little and while not being allowed supervised tape recording for your own use, unlike elsewhere your time there is almost futile.

If you are in the Dock then forget it as it is even worse even if handed an audio loop to use. Bullet proof glass meant, in one of my recent cases, that it became so ridiculous I pushed off to my cell to have a cup of tea and read the paper while they ‘got on with the verdict (already laid down by written instructions by the then recorder of Cardiff , HHJ Llewellyn Jones QC. In that case the District Judge, John Charles, ordered I was not allowed to cross examine anyone, not just the rogue psychiatrist and Caswell Clinic staff that sanctioned the fabricated paperwork to have me registered MAPPA level 3 to get shot.

I have to fight for my custody records but, sure enough, my passport was listed in my property but when I was ejected from the prison it was nowhere to be seen!

Why snatch your passport, my friends in the public gallery asked? Your legal papers from your prison cell is obvious and the blocking of access to lap top and CDs but why the passport, so unlawfully?

That is an easy answer

1. His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC’s 4^th September 2013 Judgment, staying ALL my civil proceedings against the South Wales Police, following their latest ‘knee jerk’ flair up of ‘activity’, to have me gaoled for the seventeenth time, since 2010, without achieving a conviction, means the Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) has had to employ a barrister from outside the area. The Bristol based barrister’s task is to secure my next unlawful incarceration in South Wales signifies just how desperate the Cardiff Cabal is becoming.

2. Mark Davenport was a witness, earlier this year, to the South Wales Police having me arrested in Brittany, sectioned and locked up in a French psychiatric hospital. I only escaped further sectioning because a passing nurse, who looked after me two years earlier, recognised me and set the alarm bells ringing. I had been in Pontivy hospital for my hip replacement as my NHS Caswell Clinic diagnosed ‘significant brain damage’ excluded my being able to be operated anywhere in the UK. Further evidence of the ‘entante cordiale’ police ‘cross border’ conspiracy could only be gathered by my personal complaint to the French IPCC, in person.

3. Without my passport in my pocket I could be arrested again, snatched off the street, as ‘ non identifiable’ and sent back to Cardiff prison just as Cardiff police had been done before from the very same two police stations dealing with this current scenario.

4. Her Ladyship asked that I put into writing reasons why I needed all criminal cases to be heard well outside South Wales before considering the possibility of ordering put in writing

5. Her Ladyship asked that I put it in writing why my last year’s incarceration before dropped indictment , following two Caswell Clinic doctors lying to the police that I had been around to their home harassing them, was relevant to this present list of charges.

6. Easy, I thought to myself, it is my legal submission that last year’s conspiracy with the two doctors to jail me, without trial, IS within this court’s jurisdiction BUT more to the point, it is relevant to His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC’s civil stayed case. I might serve the full content of the hundred or so lever arch files of evidence during the 27^th Sept? proposed management hearing in order to finally get that jury promised me 20 years ago when I first started fighting this cess pit of evil in South Wales.

7. I was, incidentally, again refused a copy of my custody video as defendant interview, under caution, as it is so crucial, each time, to expose police conspiracy.

8. The exclusion of the video is the first positive indication of the CPS proposing to drop the charges as no judge in Wales will get you the proof of the conspiracy on depositions once the case is buried. It stinks, doesn’t it?

9. Often, just like in many of my previous cases, none of the relevant CCTV footage, under the care of the police/CPS/courts or ‘apparent ‘victim’ making the complaint appears to be disclosed, despite my demanding as soon as the hand cuffs clip on. Just as HHJ John Curran QC said to the 2012 ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ jury, in reply to their note, for court and custody records and cell CCTV, ‘unavailable’! Deja Vu

More facts to go on this posting later tonight IF NOT A NEW BLOG .......'light at the end of the tunnel'

Emergency Application to His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

Maurice — Sun, 28 Jul 2013 13:22:00 GMT

13 07 28 Emergency Aplication re Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police BS614159.pdf

13 07 28 MJK Statement of Truth.pdf

13 07 29 MJK Statement.pdf

Bristol Solicitor Instructions

13 07 30 MJK Instructions.pdf

http://mckenzie-friends.co.uk/

Let us not forget the lucrative child snatching industry, no doubt yet another of Blair's wicked schemes to bleed the unsuspecting taxpayer of their right for a peaceful existance

Visit, today, to Melissa Laird in Holloway prison fighting extradition, without snatched son...... will your child be next?

Maria, Moi et Sabine

WITHIN HOURS I am back in gaol and Melissa bundled out of the Country and deported to US

Maurice invited to compete in Schneider Trophy above Alderney but only if G-KURK WW2 Piper Cub is ready?

Now I need some quick piece of transport...ah my CBR 600..ideal!

23rd July 2013 Final Submissions @10.30am Cardiff Civil Justice Centre Why Maurice Jailed Yet Again

Maurice — Sun, 14 Jul 2013 13:32:00 GMT

Closing Submissions for 23rd July13 final hearing of 20 year running case, Kirk v South Wales Police before we all move onto five more damages claims similarly blocked for years.

The machine gun and rogue psychiatrist cases may be first

The latter tried to get me incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Hospital for life.

FINAL PAGINATED VERSION 13 07 16 Claimants Closing Submissions KIRK v SOUTH WALES POLICE BS 614159.pdf

OPERATION MUSA KIDS SNATCH BACK http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Reporting-In.aspx

11 09 22 MUSA SNATCH KIDS BACK ORDER (part).docx

http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/2013/07/21/maurice-gagged-the-unique-legal-weapon-in-uk-secret-family-courts/

re 25th July 'hand in' of SNATCHED CHILDREN PETITION to Number 10 Downing Street.

ACCOUNT OF INCIDENT 13 07 14 Claimant Position Statement.pdf

AND JUST WHY? 13 07 15 five page interim submision BS 614159.docx

Extracts from three ladies e-mails

He said he was just being delayed to make life difficult before submitting his final summary.

Chicaneries and shenanigans – before denials, lies and crimes to cover up crimes...

He had given them my phone number in the afternoon, and they called at 12.40 in the night!!!

Just as Maurice had one page to complete his response for Civil action it appears that SWP are at it again. I have no idea what has provoked them but he is being 'processed' at Cardiff Bay Police HQ as I write as I have phoned the custody suite (via three operators) A Sergeant Morgan informed me that he would tell M that I had phoned.

Ahh!

Dear Maurice.docx

The South Wales Police painted my old decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine gun a different colour, deliberately, in order to try and fool the Cardiff jury for their planned mandatory ten year imprisonment to stop this 20 year running damages claim once and for all.

When that failed they resorted to playing their 'gulag card' by blackmailing their very own NHS Caswell Clinic prison psychiatrist to satisfy no less than eleven Cardiff judges, so far, that I have a paranoid delusional disorder with significant and irreversible brain damage all possibly because of a tumour.

When that only achieved, for their victim, an three extra months in jail there only remains the ultimate deterrent other than having him shot.

A Section 42 is again in the grubby hands of the Cardiff Cabal ready for HM to deal to prevent the very real risk of further embarrassment within the Principality's judiciary.

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

Inside The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons building while being Struck Off the veterinary register

http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/05/13/all-key-witnesses-refused-oh-what-a-surprise.aspx

7th June 13 Royal Courts of Justice Hearing Right to Tape Record and Call Defendant as Witness

Maurice — Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:26:00 GMT

AN E-MAIL WITH NO RESPONSE

FAO Mr Justice Morgan

6^th June 2013 12.02pm

FAO Hearings Cardiff County Court                       BS614159

22nd & 23rd May2013 Claimant Position Statements Ruling

Further to my visit to the court to collect the 'by Tuesday' ruling, promised at the last day of the hearing, l have telephoned today about the Claimant being able to refer to it in RCJ on 7th June 13 as the alternative, possibly, to Barbara Wilding being the subject of the proceedings as past Chief Constable.

Her 'oh so dodgy' 25th Feb 2009 sworn affidavit was written with malice aforethought and proved in court following 99 witnesses's evidence.

There is no need for the Defendant's legal team
to attend as the tape recording issue is not for them.

If the outstanding ruling is substituted for Mr Justice Morgan to consider then compromise as to which witnesses should still be allowed to give evidence could be settled between parties NOW

Without that ruling causes me to remain in some difficulties for tomorrow's RCJ application

Please forward to RCJ as I still cannot find the RCJ ref number or e-mail.

Thankyou

28 May 2013   Further ruling on second list of witnesses whom Mr Kirk wishes to call.

On 29 April 2013, at a time when the Defendant were shortly to call their last witness, Mr Kirk delivered a written list of 44 witnesses whom he wished to call. On 1^st May 2013 I delivered a written ruling identifying which witnesses he was to be permitted to call. I did so pursuant to the responsibility upon the court to control the evidence by giving directions, and actively to case manage the case, under CPR 32.1 and CPR 1.4. In that written ruling it I set out the nature of the present proceedings; the Orders which have been made previously, setting out in particular the dates by which witness statements, or witness summaries, had been required to be served; the background from 2008 to date in respect of preparation of the present trial insofar as it permitted or impeded Mr Kirk’s ability to prepare evidence and secure witness statements or summaries; and the principles by which the court is governed in respect of the calling of witnesses. I adopt that in full for the purpose of the present ruling and I do not repeat it here.

Since then, Mr Kirk has given evidence over several days and has called 13 witnesses. By a Position Statement dated 22^nd May 2013 Mr Kirk served a further written list of some 19 named witnesses he would wish to call. I stated on 24 May that I would again give ruling in writing. This is (i) for clarity as to my reasons and (ii) for ease of access to a record of the ruling. I understand that a hearing is listed for Friday 7 June 2013 to consider permission to appeal (and/or appeal itself) against my ruling of 1 May 2013. I will in this ruling list the witnesses individually in this ruling, as I did in the last, by number and name in Mr Kirk’s list but preceded by a letter “B”, to avoid confusion, assuming that the present ruling may also be the subject of application for permission to appeal.

B1.       Ex-Inspector Coliandris. This is a former police officer. In these proceedings the Defendant gave an undertaking to call or tender any witness in respect of whom a witness statement had been lodged, so long as that was a presently serving officer and thus within the control of the Defendant; but expressly did not give that undertaking in respect of any witness who was no longer a serving police officer. I was told that Mr Coliandris was reluctant to attend court because of his state of health. I am aware that he wrote to the court himself seeking to inform the court confidentially of his state of health and his reservations, but stating that he did not want these details to be made known to Mr Kirk. I declined to read his representations so long as he wished the content of his communications to be kept from one of the parties and I so informed them. In the event Mr Coliandris was not called and the Defendant did not seek to tender his evidence, whether live or under the Civil Evidence Act.

Mr Kirk does not articulate the nature of the evidence which he believes Mr Coliandris could give. On the face of his witness statement Mr Coliandris is not a direct witness to any fact or incident in issue. He appears to have looked into complaint by Mr Kirk, without identifying relevant material evidence. If so, then this appears to be a witness whom Mr Kirk wishes to call blind, in the hope of either fishing for evidence in support of his case or simply cross-examining the witness in support of the same exercise. I have also sought to be alert to the possibility that a witness might be able to assist, as to the matters in issue, if he is referred to in documents before the court; but I have identified no such reference.

Accordingly I rule against permission to call this witness.

B2.       Ex Chief Inspector Trigg. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 15 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. No new material is advanced. The same considerations apply. Accordingly I still rule against permission to call Mr Trigg.

B3.      Mr Brian Genner. This is a witness who has given evidence in relation to the events of 6 June 1995. Mr Anthony Gafael and his girlfriend Alison Genner the daughter of this witness were excluded that day from their flat, an incident which led to prosecution of Mr Kirk, and in respect of which Mr Kirk complains that police officers forced entry through a roller shutter door to Mr Kirk’s premises. There are discrepancies between the account in the witness statement for these proceedings of Sergeant Roe (as he was in 1995) and others, including Mr Genner, as to when Roe was present or what he did. In the case of Mr Roe, Mr Kirk produced after Mr Roe’s evidence a statement of the time from Sergeant Roe which appeared clearly inconsistent with what Mr Roe had told me. I therefore permitted Mr Roe, exceptionally, to be recalled for further cross-examination. The inconsistencies have been explored in cross-examination by Mr Kirk and in questions from myself.

Mr Kirk seeks that Mr Genner be recalled also. However the evidence of Mr Genner has been given. The evidence of Anthony Gafael has now been given. If there is material in the evidence of Mr Genner (or Mr Gafael) on which Mr Kirk seeks to rely, or inconsistencies in the evidence between witnesses on which he seeks to rely, that is available in closing submissions and will be for me to consider as in any other case. Unlike Mr Roe, there is no earlier inconsistent written statement of Mr Genner relied upon (which in any event, if it had been available, ought to have been put to him), nor other proper reason for him to be recalled.

B4.       Mr Roe. He has been recalled once (see above). It would be wholly exceptional for a witness to be recalled for a second time. I have now heard evidence from Mr Gafael. However Mr Kirk identifies nothing new which would justify, and I have failed to identify anything in the evidence of Mr Gafael which would justify, recalling Mr Roe.

B5.       Ex Chief Inspector Colin Jones. Mr Kirk states that he is a “key player”. A chief reason for Mr Kirk’s interest is that at one of Mr Kirk’s appeals in the Crown Court a police officer attended as an observer, when he was seen to be nodding towards a police officer PC Rewbridge during the giving of her evidence. According to Mr Kirk, when asked to explain himself, the police officer said he was attending on instruction from Chief Inspector Colin Jones. Inferentially, Mr Kirk believes that Mr Colin Jones is, or may be, one of the senior police officers whom he passionately believes to have conspired to hound him.

As with a number of police officers whom Mr Kirk wished to call in his list of 29 April 2013, (i) there is no statement from the proposed witness (ii) it is wholly unlikely that the witness will give a statement, and (iii) there is no direct evidence of connection of the witness with the specific matters in issue in these proceedings. I consider that the real wish of Mr Kirk is to cross-examine the witness in the hope that something might turn up; but that there is no discernible prospect that such an exercise would assist the court.

B6.       Inspector Andrew Rice. Mr Kirk has submitted on a great number of occasions that Mr Rice should be recalled. Evidence has been given by a Mr Alexander-Ebbs that he attended Aust Service Station to give a witness statement, in respect of an assault he alleged against Mr Kirk, at a meeting attended by a number of persons including Mr Rice, where he was encouraged to “sex up” his account. However Mr Alexander-Ebbs was present in person at this court on 21^st February 2013 during the continued evidence of Mr Rice; gave a witness statement on that day making the allegations against Mr Rice; and these allegations were put to Mr Rice. Otherwise, Mr Kirk assets that Mr Rice must have been aware fo covert surveillance of Mr Kirk; and/or he now wonders whether it was Mr Rice whom he sought to “arrest” outside the magistrates’ court (rather than a Sergeant Hill) when handing over a file which Mr Kirk thought might contain important real evidence. In my respectful judgment there is, (and there continues to be), no justification for the recall of Mr Rice.

B7.       Inspector Steve Parry. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 43 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. No new material is advanced. The same considerations apply. Accordingly I still rule against permission to call Mr Parry.

B8.       Jonathan Clayton.   I made ruling in respect of Mr Clayton on 1 May 2013. No witness statement or witness summary has been served in respect of him. He is said to be relevant to the incident of 4 July 1999, but it is not said that he was a direct witness to any of the events of that day. If anything, there is less reason now for him to be called, in that Mr Kirk’s witness Susan Jenkins has given evidence of what is required of those flying from one airport and air traffic control zone to another; and Mr Aishe has given evidence of the closeness of the police helicopter to Mr Kirk’s aircraft I discern no sufficient or good reason for him to be called.

B9.      Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding. This is another renewed application – in respect of witness 2 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. Mr Kirk identifies nothing new. The same considerations apply now as did then. Accordingly I still rule against permission to call this witness.

B10.     Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brien. The position statement itself articulates no cause for him to be called. Orally, Mr Kirk said he was an important witness because he gave evidence which “caused the case [against Mr Kirk] to collapse”. I did not find it easy to follow what this evidence was supposed to be. It seemed to be that an HORT1 form was said by the police officers to have been served upon Mr Kirk, yet no document was ever traced, nor an audit trial provided for such a document, hence the case against Mr Kirk failed. However, to the extent that this is right, Mr Kirk may in any event rely upon it.

This is an incident of May 1995. in which Mr Kirk shows particular interest, in that Special Constable Deren Martin says that she served him with an HORT1 form; and has given evidence that she made enquiries with the police in Guernsey (in pursuit of whether Mr Kirk’s vehicle was or was not exempt from vehicle excise licence), being told that there was warrant for his arrest outstanding. This fuels Mr Kirk’s suspicion and belief that he was the subject of harassment by police in Wales because of his past travails with Guernsey police.

Nonetheless, it seems to me that Mr O’Brian is a paradigm case of a proposed witness from whom there is no witness statement or summary, no reason to suppose that the witness (if he can be found) will give a statement, no indication whether he would remember whether another officer served an HORT1 firm on Mr Kirk on a day 18 years ago, SC Deren Martin being the officer in the case, and one whom Mr Kirk hopes to cross-examine despite him being called as his own witness, in the hope that something might turn up. Accordingly I decline to give permission for this witness to be called.

B11.     Ex SC Ridley. Mr Kirk tells me, (if I have succeeded in following him correctly), that Mr Ridley was the investigating officer for the same incident as resulted in police photographs being taken of his vehicle (as was done for SC Deren Martin for the May 1995 incident). Similar considerations apply as with SC O’Brien. So far as I can see, this is fishing in the dark. In default of witness statement, or the beginnings of a witness summary, I cannot justify permission to call the witness.

B12.    Mrs Diana Graham. Mr Kirk asks for a “foreign witness summons”. This witness lives in France. The Claimant’s Witness Bundle includes at page 91-123 a statement, not in proper form, by this witness with associated documents. The bulk of the statement relates to the proceedings which followed the Vale of Glamorgan Show incident of August 1998, (Action 3, “2”). This is one of the claims struck out by my rulings of November 2010. Accordingly that which relates to it is not now material.

Much of the rest relates to how Mr Kirk was dealt with on occasions in court, by magistrates (and occasionally by judges, including judges in the Divisional Court), some of it clearly recording what Mr Kirk said to her and some although much less clearly being personal observation on the part of Mrs Graham. I informed the parties that I would read this statement and discard all that related to the Vale of Glamorgan Show. I do not envisage that Mrs Graham could assist me significantly further by giving evidence orally and, as I have made clear on a number of occasions, it is not permissible to call a witness in the hope that she might add something further which is not contained either in a witness statement or witness summary. Not least, if there were anything material for Mrs Graham to add, the time has long passed when such material was required to be lodged with the court. I will treat the statement as admitted in evidence, but I will make no further order.

B13.     Mr Gafael. He has now been called, since I directed steps for bailiff service of Notice to show Cause which secured his attendance on 24 May 2013.

B14.     G. Thomas. Without agreeing the content of the statement, the Defendant is content that the statement be read.   The same applies to a Mr Kirke (as to maintenance of tyres on vehicles of Mr Kirk), whom Mr Kirk raised orally on 23 May 2103 as a potential witness.

B15.    Nigel Thomas. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 30 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. No statement has been produced. No new material is advanced and the same considerations apply as before. I rule against deferment of conclusion of the evidence in order for him to be searched for and thus against permission to call Mr Thomas.

B17.     Mrs Kirstie Kirk. In the event she has been called.

B18.     Mrs G Jones. This appears not to be pursued by Mr Kirk.

B19.     Mrs J Hanson. Mr Kirk told me that he had ‘lost her statement’. In fact there is a letter from her at page 168 (Claimant’s Witness Bundle) which raises complaint about disturbance from his wayward tenants. Mr Kirk and Barry police officer witnesses whom I have heard agree the problems with alcoholism, and bad behaviour on the part of his tenants, in particular a Mr Paul Stringer and a Mr Burns. Oral evidence from Mrs Hanson, not found or available to date, is not reasonably necessary for me to deal justly with the matters in issue.

With the exception of one witness, there is no other witness whom Mr Kirk wishes to call. That exception is B16, a Michael Murphy. The Defendant made clear a considerable time ago that that it objected to reception of the evidence without the opportunity to cross-examine the witness. No witness summons was served in respect of this witness. Mr Kirk told me on Friday 24 May that he had expected the witness to be present voluntarily that day. However there was, and has been since, no communication to the court from the witness.

It is understandable that the Defendant should object to his short statement being admitted without the opportunity to cross-examine him. The statement is one compiled by Mr Kirk in September 2010, with an added signature of the witness, and in manuscript the words “content below relating to me is true to the best of belife(sic)”. It describes him as a scrap dealer previously reported for stealing a veterinary practice car back in 1996 (presumably Mr Kirk’s veterinary practice); and the police are said to have told the witness on the one hand “I want you to take it back immediately to Penarth police station, where I will later inform Kirk it has been traced” and on the other hand one of the police is said to have jumped into the scrap dealer’s cab and himself to have driven it to Penarth: the two clearly conflict. On the other hand the statement reads that the police told him “We hate Kirk’s guts” and that the policeman said he would “have the greatest of pleasure in booking Kirk when he comes to collect it and drives it away without tax, MOT or insurance”.

The failure to appear without explanation, to support the statement such as I have described it, is not a prepossessing basis to ask for the court to appoint another day of hearing. If all, or even some, of Mr Kirk’s complaints of police harassment and bad faith are upheld, on the other evidence I have heard over some 49 days, the evidence of the scrap dealer suspected of stealing the practice car in 1996 will be peripheral; if few, or none are upheld it will be improbable that the evidence of Mr Murphy would tilt the balance on any of them. The court has gone to what I consider to be extreme lengths, in order to accommodate genuine difficulties to Mr Kirk in preparing his case, and those which are of his own making; and has granted great latitude to him in calling witnesses despite failure to serve statements in the form and by the dates stipulated. Applying the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly and proportionately, I do not consider it reasonably necessary that the court should appoint another day for hearing of evidence in the case of this witness.

28 May 2013.                                      His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn, QC

Appellants’ Skeleton Argument for Mr Justice Morgan              BS416159

(Late due to the Appellant waiting for the written rulings of his last applications before Cardiff County Court in time to appeal at Royal Courts of Justice and without it am unable to adequately comment on the Respondent’s skeleton argument with errors and huge assumptions)

There are but three issues for His Lordship to consider,

1)    the right for the Claimant to have the Defendant(s) give evidence in the light of the apparent criminal intent born out both in evidence and contained within the paragraphs of the Chief Constable’s 25^th February 2009 sworn affidavit in another attempt to avoid disclosure of relevant evidence under his/her control since 1992 to date

2)    the right for the Claimant to have senior police officers, identified both before and during the trial, to give evidence or to be recalled, with or without witness statements, concerning their apparent course of conduct to both prejudice the Claimant’s health and his basic right to bring a claim for civil damages in the first place

3)    for the Claimant or his legal representatives to only tape record evidence given on oath, under the strict supervision of the court and/or to be supplied with an audible copy of court proceedings as is allowed all over the world nowadays, including in England.

Witnesses

The Claimant’s right to call both a competent and compellable witness when, by law, a witness is ‘anybody’s property’ and especially, as in this case of these first three of nine Actions for damages against the South Wales Police, one Defendant, as the example, has been identified as signing her own 2009 affidavit (attached) knowing or ought to have known it to be riddled with lies and supports the Appellant’s argument that the Defendant has carried out a course of conduct tantamount to both unusual and extreme bullying with criminal intent.

Analysis of 25^th February 2009 Barbara Wilding Affidavit:

18.   para 8.23

Another traffic incident and a Barry court case was born out in evidence making her denial there ever was one another of her lies to bury the truth of a clear conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The lengths to which key players, mostly senior police officers, have been protected in these civil proceedings, is scandalous.

19.   para 8.26 as per paragraph 13

20.   para 8.13

The incident when my Guernsey registered BMW motorcycle was stolen while her covert surveillance police were at the scene, my Barry veterinary Hospital, when the theft took place, makes her denial the police removed the number plate, on recovery, just one more of her lies.

2^nd Action

23.   para 5.1

The incident of her officers falsifying Barry magistrates evidence by trying to ‘frame me’ for someone else’s speeding offence was proved in court with the subsequent arrest of the lawyer and seizure of the Crown Prosecution Service’s file makes her denial there ever was an incident or a court case one more of her lies.

The fact that Dolmans, solicitors, admit CPS prosecutor, Stan Soffa, did not wish to be called as her defence witness beggars belief and anyway, who’s counting the incidents committed by the police?

27. to 29   para 10.1

First arrested for the theft of a car I had already reported as stolen, they having confiscated it and deliberately not told me where it was, just like with my Guernsey registered BMW motorcycle and Honda van, secondly, stopped for speeding and faulty exhaust and then, ten or so minutes later, stopped on some fabrication, to breathalyse, embarrassingly overlooked by the previous officers.

3^rd Action

32.

Her throw away comment of ‘antiquity’ being her excuse of failed disclosure is both insulting and typically arrogant. From 1993 onwards my English solicitors, me or my secretaries would follow up each incident with requests for either disclosure or to preserve their records.

Adrian Oliver drafted her document being a party to the fanciful plan to prejudice these civil proceedings by arresting me for trading in machine guns, carrying a mandatory ten year prison term. Caswell Clinic convened my MAPPA level 3 hearings to have me further incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison but only using their rogue NHS (Wales) psychiatrist promised GMC protection for whatever he said in a Welsh court room.

These following 22^nd and 23^rd May13 Position Statements were subject to appeal to the High Court but have not been adjudicated upon in time, at the Cardiff County Court, for this 7^th June 2013 Royal Courts of Justice Hearing

That coupled with his Lordship’s Order suggesting that this Claimant ‘may or may not be appealing earlier rulings’ over witnesses causes the court to be reminded that this hearing ought to be adjourned for all the reasons set out in the Appellant’s 28^th May Application (attached at the bottom)

22^nd May 13 Claimant Position Statement

1.      The Claimant asks His Honour to consider whether it is fitting that the Defendant be asked to more formally clarify their position on some points that at first may seem unrelated but have a common theme of legal argument around :-

a.       Whether the Claimant should be allowed to amend any of his Claims ‘out of time’.

b.      Be allowed the issue of exemplary and/or aggravated damages to be considered.

c.       Will the Defendants ever stop ‘actually harassing’ the Claimant as for example of in recent times by police using and sending to other police forces information to lead other police forces and other public sector departments to view the Claimant prejudicially by leading them to believe that the Claimant is delusional.

d.      By the Defendant disseminating information to say the Claimant is delusional either that means what they say is untrue and the Defendant refuse to stop harassing the Claimant and may affect the level of damages

e.       Or if what the Defendant disseminates is true then being delusional is a condition which allows the Claimant to be eligible to amend the Claims before the court that are ‘out of time’ by the time limitation period.

2.      The Claimant raises the issues from reading page 198 point 13.40 and related sections of A Practical Approach to Civil Procedure by Stuart Sime, twelfth edition (2009) that says that Judicial reasoning can be that Claims can usually be amended but that an amendment is treated as a new claim and cannot be brought out of time. However page 101 gives explanation on point 7.40 that a Claim (and therefore an amendment to a Claim) can be brought ‘out of time’ if the Claimant had a mental disability at the time the new Claim accrued.

3.      As the Defendant, in recent years, persistently disseminates information about the Claimant, as being delusional, then that means the Claimant may apply to the Court to amend the Claims that accrued when he was delusional.

4.      If the information, disseminated by the Defendant, is not true then that may be relevant exemplary and aggravated damages and even amount to defamation.

5.      If the information that the Defendant disseminates about the Claimant, being delusional, is untrue then the Claimant asks that a statement is made as to when the Defendant will stop disseminating this untrue defamatory information and how it will go about achieving that as well as the Defendants withdrawing what they have sent to many other public bodies, including the Metropolitan Police, the Guernsey police, the French police and even government departments in the royal courts of Justice and Whitehall from around 2002 and onwards when applications were made that the Claimant be registered a Vexatious Litigant and as a MAPPA level 3 victim.

6.      If, on the other hand, the information they disseminate about the Claimant is true then that requires the Defendant to say as from what date he is delusional or with a mental disability as the Claimant can be allowed by the Court to amend any claim that accrued from that date when he first had a mental disability.

7.      As we are aware much by the Claimant is in writing and so if the Defendant gives detail as to the Claimant being delusional, for just one moment, then an independent expert can be used to trace back the detail from that moment identified by the Defendant to where the indication of delusional in writings first emerged.

8.      A critical detail is that the Defendant actually disseminates information to say that the Claimant is delusional for ‘thinking he is harassed by police’.

9.      The Claimant complains to police, at least, as from 20^th June 1993, when the Claimant was in unlawful custody, up an including to today’s Position Statement

10. Given the Defendant disseminates information that the Claimant is delusional, for thinking he is harassed by police, please would the Defendant clarify at what point the Claimant was first displaying being delusional, by complaining he was harassed by police, so that the Claimant can apply to amend his Claims that accrued on or after that date.

11. If the Claimant was not delusional about being harassed by police, yet wrote and complained that he was harassed by police from say, 20^th June 1993, following information given to the Defendant by the Guernsey Police, at what point will the Defendant ensure the Claimant is no longer harassed by police, such as the Defendant stopping disseminating false and malicious information about the Claimant and will the Defendant comment on the obvious reluctance of the Defendant to stop harassing the Claimant in the context of exemplary and/or aggravated damages

A)      Witnesses outstanding in 1-3 Actions

1.       Ex Inspector Colliandris (medical argument irrelevant)

2.       Ex Chief Inspector Sean (Shawn) Trigg (key player)

3.       Ex Brian Jenner (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

4.        Ex Chief Inspector Insp Robert Nelson Roe (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

5.        Ex Chief Inspector Collin Jones (key player)

6.        Inspector Andrew Rice (Recall re 1^st Action 8.23 & CP Ebbs/Alexander)

7.        Inspector Steve Parry (Penal order on Defendant)

8.        Jonathan Clayton Air Traffic Controller (Dangerous flying/Penal Order)

9.        Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding (Defendant)

10.      Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian (Penal Order on Defendant)

11.      Ex Special Constable Ridley (Penal Order on Defendant)

12.       Mrs Diana Graham (Foreign Witness Summons)

13.       A Gafael (re break-in Cardiff Vet surgery/Penal Order)

14.       G Thomas (stolen BMW m/c/ Penal order)

15.       ‘Yosser’ Nigel Thomas (stolen BMW m/c)

16.       Michael Murphy (Defendant’s destruction of Claimant’s vehicles)

17.      Mrs K Kirk

18.      Mrs G Jones

19.      Mrs J Hanson

B)       Application for Jury Trials for:

a)     4^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

b)    5^th Action Machine gun Case/malicious pros, false imprisonments

c)     6^th Action Forensic Psychiatrist/NHS (Wales) False Medical Records

           d)     7^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

     e)     8^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

C)    Claimant’s Fitness to Continue?

D)   Previous ‘struck out’ incidents in 1-3 Actions to be re instated

E)     Current Civil Proceedings (post Woolf/ Human Rights Act)

F) HM Crown Prosecution Service continues to ignore disclosure applications from Claimant, his solicitor or from his barrister re:

              i) Refusal to disclose evidence to clarify NHS psychiatric records at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend

             ii)  Refusal to disclose July 2012 evidence re doctor's statement that caused Claimant imprisoned

            iii) Refusal to disclose depositions re above withdrawn indictment of 'harassment'

          iv) Refusal to disclose depositions re one Lewis machine gun indictment and subsequent acquittal

           v) Refusal to supply Claimant with copy of his own MG11 victim statement re above outstanding issues

            vi) Refusal to supply Claimant with date he was first deemed to have a mental disability

G)     Interim payment for costs and damage

Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                                                  22^nd May 2013

(23^rd May 13 Position Statement mislaid and to follow)

Private Tape Recording, ‘Litigants in Person’ to be awarded legal costs and the Crushing of Family Court Cartels

The future of our UK court administration, if not already a night mare, is a pretty grim one right now with the lack of funding for expertise and the extra work caused by the withdrawal of legal aid.

One’s inability to find a truly independent lawyer these days with ever mounting unexplained costs incurred, should you be so lucky, is why this Claimant is adding to the problem by having to act alone.

Also, if this Claimant’s current Cardiff court action is typical of a ‘litigant in person’ floundering around in a quagmire of both regulation and custom with fast aging faculties barely keeping his head above water, then what is the future of our law courts when many more are forced to do the same?

In order for ‘litigants in person’ to achieve anything from the clear futility of it all then to further break down lucrative and unfair cartels, as currently practiced in the UK courts, is what each must strive to do and share any information from one’s mistakes.

This Claimant suggests we remain vigilant in what is to be ultimately achieved, the significant reform of a grossly outdated money driven judiciary and not to allow our own court cases to over shadow this primary objective, the clinching of that man made concept, some call ‘justice’ for all parties.

In The High Court Royal Courts of Justice                                                     BS614159

Before Mr Justice Morgan

Maurice Kirk v Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

Appellant’s Application to Adjourn of 7^th June 13 High Court Hearing

Further to the 14^th May 2013 High Court Order of the Honourable Mr Justice Morgan the Appellant applies for an appropriate adjournment in order to:

12. Obtain the official transcript as he was unable to tape record for his own use within the case in preparation for subsequent appeal(s)

13. obtain clarification as to which of the outstanding witnesses, identified in his 22^nd and 23^rd May 13 Position Statements to the Crown Court judge and

14. in the light of the enclosed further statement of A G Gafael and The Defendant’s February 2009 sworn Affidavit and

15. concerning the proposed 28^th May 13 ruling , by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, due to be handed down today and

16. For appellant to obtain fee exemption in order to complete his prosecution and subsequent appeal(s)

AND

17. The Appellant asks the court to consider whether it is fitting that the Defendant be asked to more formally clarify their position on some points that at first may seem unrelated but have a common theme of legal argument around :-

f.        Whether the Appellant should be allowed to amend any of his Claims ‘out of time’.

g.       Be allowed the issue of exemplary and/or aggravated damages to be considered.

h.       Will the Defendants ever stop ‘actually harassing’ the Appellant as for example of in recent times by police using and sending to other police forces information to lead other police forces and other public sector departments to view the Appellant prejudicially by leading them to believe that the Appellant is delusional.

i.         By the Defendant disseminating information to say the Appellant is delusional either that means what they say is untrue and the Defendant refuse to stop harassing the Appellant and may affect the level of damages

j.        Or if what the Defendant disseminates is true then being delusional is a condition which allows the Appellant to be eligible to amend the Claims before the court that are ‘out of time’ by the time limitation period.

18. The Appellant raises the issues from reading page 198 point 13.40 and related sections of A Practical Approach to Civil Procedure by Stuart Sime, twelfth edition (2009) that says that Judicial reasoning can be that Claims can usually be amended but that an amendment is treated as a new claim and cannot be brought out of time. However page 101 gives explanation on point 7.40 that a Claim (and therefore an amendment to a Claim) can be brought ‘out of time’ if The Appellant had a mental disability at the time the new Claim accrued.

19. As the Defendant, in recent years, persistently disseminates information about the Appellant, as being delusional, then that means the Appellant may apply to the Court to amend the Claims that accrued when he was delusional.

20. If the information, disseminated by the Defendant, is not true then that may be relevant exemplary and aggravated damages and even amount to defamation.

21. If the information that the Defendant disseminates about the Appellant, being delusional, is untrue then the Appellant asks that a statement is made as to when the Defendant will stop disseminating this untrue defamatory information and how it will go about achieving that as well as the Defendants withdrawing what they have sent to many other public bodies, including the Metropolitan Police, the Guernsey police, the French police and even government departments in the royal courts of Justice and Whitehall from around 2002 and onwards when applications were made that the Appellant be registered a Vexatious Litigant and as a MAPPA level 3 victim.

22. If, on the other hand, the information they disseminate about the Appellant is true then that requires the Defendant to say as from what date he is delusional or with a mental disability as the Appellant can be allowed by the Court to amend any claim that accrued from that date when he first had a mental disability.

23. As we are aware much by the Claimant is in writing and so if the Defendant gives detail as to the Appellant being delusional, for just one moment, then an independent expert can be used to trace back the detail from that moment identified by the Defendant to where the indication of delusional in writings first emerged.

24. A critical detail is that the Defendant actually disseminates information to say that the appellant is delusional for ‘thinking he is harassed by police’.

25. The Appellant complains to police, at least, as from 20^th June 1993, when the appellant was in unlawful custody, up an including to today’s Position Statement.

26. Given the Defendant disseminates information that the Appellant is delusional, for thinking he is harassed by police, please would the Defendant clarify at what point the Appellant was first displaying being delusional, by complaining he was harassed by police, so that the Appellant can apply to amend his Claims that accrued on or after that date.

27. If the Appellant was not delusional about being harassed by police, yet wrote and complained that he was harassed by police from say, 20^th June 1993, following information given to the Defendant by the Guernsey Police, at what point will the Defendant ensure the appellant is no longer harassed by police, such as the Defendant stopping disseminating false and malicious information about the Appellant and will the Defendant comment on the obvious reluctance of the Defendant to stop harassing the Appellant in the context of exemplary and/or aggravated damages

A)      Witnesses outstanding in 1-3 Action

1.       Ex Inspector Colliandris (medical argument irrelevant)

2.       Ex Chief Inspector Sean (Shawn) Trigg (key player)

3.       Ex Brian Jenner (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

4.        Ex Chief Inspector Insp Robert Nelson Roe (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

5.        Ex Chief Inspector Collin Jones (key player)

6.        Inspector Andrew Rice (Recall re 1^st Action 8.23 & CP Ebbs/Alexander)

7.        Inspector Steve Parry (Penal order on Defendant)

8.        Jonathan Clayton Air Traffic Controller (Dangerous flying/Penal Order)

9.        Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding (Defendant)

10.      Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian (Penal Order on Defendant)

11.      Ex Special Constable Ridley (Penal Order on Defendant)

12.       Mrs Diana Graham (Foreign Witness Summons)

13.       A Gafael (re break-in Cardiff Vet surgery/Penal Order)

14.       G Thomas (stolen BMW m/c/ Penal order)

15.       ‘Yosser’ Nigel Thomas (stolen BMW m/c)

16.       Michael Murphy (Defendant’s destruction of Claimant’s vehicles)

19.      Mrs J Hanson

B)    Application for Jury Trials for:

a)     4^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

b)    5^th Action Machine gun Case/malicious pros, false imprisonments

c)     6^th Action Forensic Psychiatrist/NHS (Wales) incorrect Medical Records

     d)     7^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

     e)     8^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

C)    Claimant’s Fitness to Continue?

D)   Previous ‘struck out’ incidents in 1-3 Actions to be re instated

E)     Current Civil Proceedings (post Woolf/ Human Rights Act)

F) HM Crown Prosecution Service continues to ignore disclosure applications from Claimant, his solicitor or from his barrister re:

              i) Refusal to disclose evidence to clarify NHS psychiatric records at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend

             ii)  Refusal to disclose July 2012 evidence re doctor's statement that caused Claimant imprisoned

            iii) Refusal to disclose depositions re above withdrawn indictment of 'harassment'

          iv) Refusal to disclose depositions re one Lewis machine gun indictment and subsequent acquittal

           v) Refusal to supply Claimant with copy of his own MG11 victim statement re above outstanding issues

            vi) Refusal to supply Claimant with date he was first deemed to have a mental disability

G)     Interim payment for costs and damage

Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                                                28^th May 2013

PILOT MAGAZINE....previous pages at bottom of previous blogs

Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (4).pdf

JUDGE ORDERS REMOVAL of DOLMANS 'WANTED' Poster re Conspiracy while ADRIAN OLIVER Continues to Coin In the Cash c

Maurice — Sat, 06 Apr 2013 11:39:00 GMT

SO what is new under the sun?

My twenty year running three month civil damage trial, for police bullying, trundles on again this week portraying my general incompetence and serious loss of 'short term memory'. I am, simply, far too old and tired for regurgitating the police's scandalous day to day conduct of the 90s, supported by a thoroughly corrupt HM Crown Prosecution Service and those running the HM courts.Their joint scandalous conduct, however, is slowly but slowly surfacing from this South Wales cesspit based on inherent deceit. All the lawyers are interested in is cash, yours or mine, do they give a dam?

eg Adrian Oliver misled the court , a few weeks ago, by withholding the following section 9 police statement by Ely police sergeant , Robert Nelson Roe, served on Dolmans, about six or seven years ago, along with some 52 bulging lever arch files , by me as every page a 'prosecution court exhibit', created by my then long suffering secretary, Mrs Dianne Graham, who has now appeared to have disappeared off the map! .......Reward for her contact details..... Thankyou.

AT TRIAL, on 8th April, JUDGE ORDERS my take off web site the DELIBERATELY DOLMANS withheld EX INSPECTOR ROE WITNESS STATEMENT

Now retired Inspector Roe has lied to me, in court, suggesting he did not know me despite my repeated visits to his Ely police station , in 1995 complaining to Anthony Gafael's criminal damage, making MG 11 police statements when ever possible. But Anthony was 'shacked up' with now retired Chief Inspector Jenner's daughter Alison, so I wasn't going to get much action from him or anyone else! Roe 'knew nothing about me and had not gone to Barry police station to interview me under caution.....the custody tape, of course , being buried with all the rest.

Thankyou Norman Scarth Esq for this very topical e-mail material sent from the banks of the river Shannon in heart of Ireland...this child snatch video goes straight on to my site.....

When I was arrested for 'trading in machine guns', under helicopter heavily armed raid of 'Operation Chalice' by cunning b*tch Barbara Wilding , Chief Constable of South Wales Police, she had up her sleeve to realy hurt, a second, unarmed this time, raid, under Operation Orchid.

A band of police who soon arrived at our home to try and snatch our then 10 year old, Genevieve, just like this video....but her mother was born of sterner stuff!

https://www.facebook.com/video/embed?video_id=443476159069924

Evil b*stards

Adrian Oliver was behind much of this wicked South Wales Police 'Operation Orchid' greeting Dr Tegwyn Williams and Barbara Wilding to get me locked away for nearly eight months in cardiff prison....purely to prejudice this civil case.

Kirstie, Gen and I flew , very low level in a wee tired cub, from the river's source, past your door and then below bank level all the way to Nenagh for the night with good friends.

In the Cardiff County Court

Case No. BS614 continues on 8th April all week and many weeks to come

come and watch and I BUY LUNCH

Please find time and consider this document:

13 04 07 Claimant Position Statement.pdf

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/default.aspx

A North Island New Zealand beach following Sir Francis Chichester's dream

CENSORED DOC removed from site

Maurice J Kirk BVSc 6^th April 13

1984 'OUT of COURT ' TV documentary , not by George Orwell but by Sue Cooke and David Jessel on Guernsey's notorious legal system and why the Guernsey police were so 'hand in glove ' with the South Wales Police, in the 90s, to hound me both off the road and have my name removed from the veterinary register.

[GUERNSEY, Channel Islands, where Maurice 'cut his teeth' on the current Welsh subject of HM Partnership's daily corruption at the ignorant tax payers' expense.....a video so apt]....

http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM

THAT TV PROGRAMME ON GUERNSEY'S HOUSING LAWS

I had up to 40 itinerent hotel workers, primarily Englsh, Irish and a lot of Welsh, during the summer months, living in my house, all hard working and only needing a bed for the night.

Accommodation included tents in the garden , each with a television and even the occasional Transit or Thames van!

As for second hand cars and motor bikes I was selling them off my front lawn, like there was 'no tomorrow' and known under the name, which was on a big sign spread across the house as reading:

"Onest Harry"

"All Cars Guarrenteed to the End of the Drive"

I remember, once a week, at midnight , going around the skips, especially up in the 'Open Market' housing districts, of St Matins, featured on the film, and dragging out TVs , freezers and washing machines which often only needed a fuse in the plug to get them to work!

And, of course, there was the huge accumulation of house rubbish, blocked loos and vomit, all needing my personal attention at 6am on most days! I found a new use for wearing a long sleeve rectal glove.

And do you remember the Sunday night parties run on illicit houch? Well, not sure if legal but Ollie and Josephine Reed often arrived with an appropriate bottle tucked under his arm.

Drinking was not allowed on Sundays so pubs were closed and only residents of hotels and the locals, at home, were allowed alcohol to pass their lips. This was the reason for my riotous Sunday night parties, run on two dustbins full of home made beer, brewed to twice the strength and sold at half price!

The island's housing census, hotel inspectors and planning inspectors proved to be a slight irritation but the 'Insular Authorities' had already shown their venom on so many honest Brits, just wishing to come to the Channel Islands to work. So well portrayed during the German occupation was their true conduct, below the thin veneer to impress incoming millionaires, many known, openly, to be drug dealers, insider dealers and what had most angry ...Guernsey was known as an IRA 'safe house'.

Harassment and bullying was what the police did as soon as I set foot on that island to work with an old college mate and exactly what the South Wales Police set about duplicating the moment I crossed the Seven Bridge in 1992

As for their small minded incestous environment, run by no more than some two hundred inbred famillies across the Channel Islands, where nepotism totally dominated 'Noddy Land', this weekly income of mine needed to be maintained as expensive boarding schools needed to be paid for back in the UK

Some £1,500 in cash, in the hand, on a Friday night for rental, some five or six cars sold and a half dozen or so kitchen appliances sold, minimum, every week and there was the rental of motor bikes, I almost forgot, meant, with my veterinary income the authorites were determined to quash, life was'nt so bad at %10 fixed rate income tax, quietly arranged with one of my many English born 'supporters' in the Tax Office senior management!

As for the huge accumulation of rubbish I had dug a 'gurt hole' in the garden, while applying to build a nuclear fall-out shelter and sold the top soil, burnt and burried the rest while advertising in the Island's news paper remaining space for 'time share nuclear fall out shelter' and actually received genuine replies!

Just as with the Welsh police I was regularly prosecuted for trumped up criminal charges and jailed not less than twenty one times despite a 75 % success rate in the so called 'Norman Law' courts with no appreciation on the word. 'disclosure of evidence or the phrase, 'human rights'.

Before I beat them in their own 'Royal Court' to get an essential worker's housing licence I bought a 60 ft French tunny boat, in Brittany, ran her up St Samson's harbour beach, exactly to the minute on the highest Spring tide, openend the 'sea cocks' for three feet of sea water to flood into the fish hold, bought 200 yards of electric cable and ran it throgh the water to the 'fishman's frre elctricity source and squatted for two years.

As for being prosecuted for housing essential wokers who were not guernsey born I dressed appropriately for that to watch the trial collapse in ridule and ignimoy, every thing they deserved for what they did in the War or didn't do.

DeVic Carey , the prosecutor featuring in the film had a grandfather who was Bailiff during the 2nd World War.

Sir Winston Churchill wanted the traitor to be hanged but lost the General Election and so Atlee had him knighted, instead.

Entering, suitably dressed for a Guernsey Magistrates hearing, that later collapsed in farce.

I was charged over their iniquitous under hand methods of administering their housing laws. I was the only one prosecuted who had failed to fill in the Island's census form...I think I was away that day!

During my regular incarcerations in their1811 prison the police made full use of the opportunity and often raided my surgery, in the early ours of the morning , Nazi style, with a sledge hammer and crow bar, (Deja Vu?) to break into each bed room if the terified occupant would not unlock the door.

I recall one such English lady, a Marianne Fanshawe, who refused to open the door. So the police swung the sledge and smashed the panel door in sufficient for her to be able to crawl out on her hands and knees and stand to recieve a summons.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx

A sample court transcript that could so easily have been a clip fron one conducted in suchmanner by either of Cardiff'District Judges, Bodfan Jenkins or John Charles, both thoroughly disreputable characters when it comes to respecting basic human rights and laws of secondary disclosure

OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT

EXTRACT

FRIDAY 10 OF DECEMBER 1988

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT

Before

John Anthony Cecil Walkey Gillett, Esquire

Magistrate

THE LAW OFFICER OF THE CROWN

-v-

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

HM DEPUTY GREFFIER	For the record Mr Kirk, is your full name Maurice John Kirk?
THE DEFENDANT	Sir, over the lunchtime, the Prison has confirmed that I have not had a psychiatric report prepared...
MAGISTRATE	Mr Kirk, would you please be silent and listen to the charge being read
THE DEFENDANT	.... Inaudible). And if you have one I would please ask to have sight of it before this case continues
MAGISTRATE	A copy was sent to the Prison on Friday - on er - when was it Mr Dorey?
HM DEPUTY GREFFIER	Yesterday afternoon.
MAGISTRATE	Yesterday afternoon.
THE DEFENDANT	Sir, the prison has no knowledge and has nothing in their records
MAGISTRATE	... on (inaudible) . Mr Kirk. Mr Kirk would you kindly be quiet and answer the charges which are to be read to you.
THE DEFENDANT	I request legal representation
MAGISTRATE	Your request is declined
THE DEFENDANT	I request Legal Aid
MAGISTRATE	Mr Kirk, if you continue to behave in this way I shall you taken down and remanded in custody until Monday. I have a busy afternoon. Now, will you kindly be silent and listen to the charge read and taken your - and make your plea.

I, Lynette M Baker, hereby certify the foregoing to be correct and complete extract, prepared to the best of my skill and ability from the tape-recording of the proceedings in the case.

Signed: L M Baker

£1,000 REWARD for WITNESSES---Police Further Cross Examination Today in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

Maurice — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 07:48:00 GMT

Friday 5th April

(Apologies my site has been invaded by alien links).......working on it

This morning, in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre we started what is to become protracted legal arguement over current and future planned publication, on this website, of the day of the apparent cavalier behaviour of DOLMANS, solicitors, Cardiff.

In order to bleed and suck out of the tax payer's pockets simply huge sums of quite un accountable cash it is dependant on a now questionably outdated adversarial legal system, itself driven by greed, whilst also using the excuse 'it is for the greater good'!

Police, next week, are to be cross examined over my being stopped and arrested by police officers in cowbridge main street, Bickerstaff and Holehouse, no doubt denying even knowing who I was or knowing anything about the almost weekly adverse experiences I and my familly had suffered under their constant bullying almost from the very first day, in1993, following my buying a veterinary general practice in Barry.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/general/Mother-Mollie-_2C00_-Snipe-and-Hector.aspx

I was arrested in Cowbridge, Vale of glamorgan , for about the eighth time, for 'driving whilst disqualified' and then seriously assaulted by police officers Bickerstaff and Holehouse I WAS NOT DISQUALIFIED

I was then de arrested, following 'their enquiries', only to be re arrested for 'a public order offence' as I argued the need for their new bright idea for me to waste more time and visit the police station with all my driving documents!

£1000 Reward for witnesses for incident in Westgate street, Cowbridge on 23rd May 2002

photos later today

I then dropped pamphlets over Cowbridge , 'from a great height' and did door to door 'pamphlet delivery' from the Eastgate traffic lights to the West gate road off to Llantwit Major offering £1000 reward but the environment is what is and always will be.

Friday 5th April

Today, during this three month trial, started 20 years ago for punitive damages against the South Wales Police for bullying, with total press blanketed censorship, Adrian Oliver, senior partner of Dolmans, solicitors, one of the prime movers in 2002 in having me struck off as a veterinary surgeon, effectively for life, complained!!

He has destroyed my marriage for advising the local police it was safe to have me jailed for nearly eight months, registered MAPPA level 3, trading in machine guns and also orchestrated my being sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, using a similarly attuned villian, a Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams of Caswell clinic psychiatric prison, Bridgend, complained!!

The Welsh 'shrink' had not even examined his victim!

Using a QC and a pretty trailing barrister, he asked the presiding judge, today, to have his 'Wanted ' poster removed from my web site....www.kirkflyingvet.com

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/South-Wales-Police-Conspiracy-to-Have-me-Shot.aspx

Does anyone, please, have a more up to date photo of this apparently evil devil worshipping rogue for all my associated web sites?

The case continues for another eight weeks unless they try, agin, in having me shot.

Thankyou

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Telephone: 07907937953 24/7
or by E-mail: maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Thursday 4th April

In The Cardiff County Court Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police

Retired Police Officer Robert Osborne’s 2^nd Day of Cross Examination

The South Wales Police, at the time, had an overall policy to ‘Get Kirk’ which was routinely spurred on from the Guernsey police, during the nineties, they also having been exposed to excessive adverse publicity. With this history and following numerous ignominious encounters, over the years, with Kirk and his various aircraft the local police set about a harassment campaign consisting of bullying or deliberate in activity using any conceivable means possible.

Unlike the majority of targeted victims Kirk was particularly vulnerable to abuse by any authority because he not only had the usual driver’s licence, he also had professional ones for his chosen vocation, being a veterinary surgeon, requiring both a fire arms certificate and a shot gun licence. Added to this he had the need of a pilot’s licences all of which, as with his veterinary qualifications, all could so easily be revoked following any spurious complaint from a senior police officer.

The police campaign was hatched within months of Kirk’s arrival to South Wales to inflict criminal acts on both Kirk and his property, coupled with the concerted policy to include ‘inactivity’, should he complain, revealing:

‘Evidence of similar fact’

Provoke him by delaying his going about his veterinary business and to arrest, on the road side whenever possible, by using: a faked ‘refused breath test or faked ‘positive breath test’ or he is in possession of a stolen car or his vehicle is un roadworthy or he is a banned driver.

ANYTHING

to get him into custody to further provoke for him to ‘retaliate’, ‘lash out’, ‘clench a fist’, anything in order that he can be further detained and charged with something that could finally ‘stick’.

Following the trial judge’s instructions the remaining ‘cross examination questions’ need to served on the court in writing, AT 2002 RCVS Disciplinary Enquiry:

Who, on 5^th April 2000, took this victim to Roath police cells?
Who failed to secure an open windowed parked veterinary surgeon’s car, outside and full of dangerous drugs when parked just a few feet from a public high way?
Why were Roath custody tapes tampered with to hide the officers’ faces who dragged the victim around the cell floor?
Why were both police custody and overhead road videos not disclosed until a year after the victim had applied for them by letter, in magistrates, in Crown Courts and in several Judicial Review applications in London despite original numerous Crown Court orders so to produce?
Could Chief Superintendent Collin Jones, in over all charge of this incident, have answered as to why the videos had been tampered with in such a significant manner relevant to your current oral evidence?
Why, do you think, this victim’s main witness, the chief inspector, in all twenty odd subsequently generated court hearings across the country, was always refused by all courts if not a typical Masonic manoeuvre ?
Why, later that day and still in custody but now at Rumney police station, after the victim had given zero/ zero readings on the alcohol definitive breath test machine did he then receive still further threats to provoke retaliation, by further detention, until next day if need be, he dared to refuse to be examined by a doctor for the remote likely hood he was under the influence of drugs?
Why was victim’s threat to sue, if not immediately released, as on 2002 RCVS transcript, see D3/54 p243 & D3/55 p244 C, not just one more example of ‘evidence of similar fact’?
Who, if not Osborne, caused further detention for a doctor examination re illicit drugs?
Why was the drugs procedure, a further and unnecessary abuse, carried out in the way it was done?
Why if not to further attempt to try and provoke the victim to ‘retaliate’?
What is the true reason for Osborne never asking the victim to ‘produce his driving documents’/
Was it because court was fixed within 6 days, see D3/57 p246A, or already police had details from 24/7 surveillance?

5^th April 2000 Newport Road Overhead Video

Watch to confirm:

a) Why was this supervised video tampered with by police either ‘post editing’, once the June 2000 court order for its release had been given or when the original camera operator wobbled or redacted footage at the critical time of the incident?

b) Why, if not to attempt to cover up the full the extent of the unlawful assault?

c) Why was there a need for such an unprovoked assault on the victim, quietly sitting at the wheel of his car, just for having failed to give a breath test if not to provoke their prisoner?

d) Why was this detained person, just recovering from an assault by his captor, considered then to be in an appropriate ‘state of mind’, ‘men rea’, to be capable of comprehending a request, from that same captor, Osborne, requiring the carrying out of road side breath test?

e) Why was the victim driver then left alone in the police van with no hand cuffs on or inside a ‘cage’, with van doors left wide open?

f) Why were you all expecting your victim to ‘run away’ if you had not been receiving directions from senior management?

Evidence of similar fact is in all incidents?

The Hayes Roundabout, Cardiff

Another vicious assault on victim driver with excessive use of force and clamping of hand cuffs on by PC Cocksey, why?
Owner of vehicle……show photo, Who?
How many times around the roundabout? 50 times, why?
Ask for driving documents? Why?
Never needed to see insurance documents….why?
Never needed to see driver’s licence……why?
Never needed to see MOT……why?
Victim taken to court for just what?
And how many times was he forced to court?
And their verdicts each time ?

As ever,

‘Evidence of similar fact’ in all incidents, heard in court, to date?

(See law reports re Michael O’Brian v South Wales Police High Court Judgment and acquittal following Cardiff’s Lynette White Murder Trial with subsequent imprisonments). Their victim of twenty years, for fear of reprisals both inside and outside of the Swansea Crown court, following the much needed prosecution of the police officers in the Lynette White case, was, himself, again unlawfully jailed on a Caswell Clinic’s police psychiatrist‘s false allegations. I was accused of harassment at the psychiatrist’s home with Dr Janis Hillier and jailed during the 2012 period when the accused South Wales Police were ‘due to give evidence’ which, of course, was never planned to happen. Once all criminal charges against the police were mysteriously dropped so, miraculously, were Kirk’s who was released from Cardiff prison to try and find, yet again, that elive creature, an independent but competent lawyer not frightened to take the evil b*stards on Maurice J Kirk BVSc 4^th April 2013copy to web site The case will continue possibly forat least two more months(see blogs below)

Subject:

Signing up to 'I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK' at PledgeBank.com

Please click on the link below to confirm your signature on the
pledge at the bottom of this email.

http://www.pledgebank.com/L/BVyQLvFuTJTaBt79hA

The pledge was created by Patrick Cullinane and reads:

'I will I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the
Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st
October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of
JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK but only if 150 other
people from the UK will do the same. We the People in the UK
have been denied our GUARANTEED RIGHTS to due-process via the
Common Law Trial by Jury, which is the Law of the Land.'

Yours,
the PledgeBank.com team

ends

BE THERE I BUY LUNCH

Kirk Crashes.doc

CASH REWARD for RETURN of MY LAP TOP STOLEN TODAY in ELY CARDIFF

Maurice — Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:39:00 GMT

I am in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre court tomorrow at 10. 30am fighting a three month trial of 20 years of police bullying.

I will pay cash for its immediate return one black Toshiba lap top, I think, 'NO QUESTIONS ASKED', no one else involved.

Please tel 07907937953 maurice@kirkflyingvet.com or call in at motor bike shop next to reptile shop on Cowbridge Road West...I will deal with an 'intermediary'

Also stolen is my blue disability badge and the CD in the lap top, at the time, that stored police custody videos, going back 15 years, the Chief Constable has appeared, the way their defence is beginning to unfold, forgotten about!

THANKYOU

For Pete's sake, boys, I was your ELY veterinary surgeon for many years, first in Grand Avenue and then next to the Reptile shop, until South Wales Police successfully applied, in 2001, to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, to successfully have my name removed from the veterinary register.

They resorted to this, with fabricated allegations and convictions, once they had given up up trying to invalidate my motoring insurance, demanding to see my documents more than 35 times in 8 years. This was to put sufficient pressure on the insurance companies identified, just as Guernsey police had succeeded in doing to assist in my removal from the island, for me to be unable to make an income working on the farms etc through out the Vale of Gamorgan.

A video summary of 20 years of South Wales Police bullying reliant on Guernsey

http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=a3xl4TvHtOE&feature=endscreen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGb6fy9IH4c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTRW2JM4VOk

http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx

.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y

Llantwit Major's police sergeant 'Killer' Kilberg Video to follow proved lying to both

custody sergeant and His Honour Judge Seys Llewellin QC, last month, one of the

custody videos now the police legal team are so desperate to block tomorrow,

http://youtu.be/eBkNCYYfJOE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=4

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Stationary-Police-Car-in-Car-Chase_3F00_-.aspx

Adrian Oliver.

15:11 (1 hour ago)

Dear Mr Kirk,

I refer to your further attendance at our offices on Thursday 28 March 2013, when you again sought to ignore the fact that we have withdrawn your licence to attend at our offices. I am given to understand that you caused disruption and inconvenience to other users of the building which we occupy and that the security staff at the building considered it necessary to communicate with the police in this regard. I would again urge you to deal with any necessary matters in compliance with the court orders which have been made in this matter.

I would also wish to record that you were not prepared to identify the basis of your attendance with the staff who sought to speak with you.

I refer to your telephone contact with Dolmans at 1.30 pm on 2 April 2013. I would again remind you of my prior request that you deal with matters by email due to your propensity to distort comments made in telephone discussion. You have been able to communicate by email and indeed, have sought to encourage the same. I record that it is only during the course of the adjournment of your civil trial that you have sought again to attend our premises and to communicate by telephone, even though you have been prepared to communicate previously by email. I would again ask you to revert to dealing with matters through this medium as it enables both parties to prepare for matters arising in the trial.

You have left a message at 1.30 pm asking for details of the witnesses who are to be called tomorrow (3 April 2013) for trial. You can be advised that it is the intention of Leading Counsel to invite former police officer Robert Osbourne to provide evidence at court on 3 April 2013.

I can also advise you however that Mr Lloyd Williams QC intends to address the court before any further evidence has been provided as to your failure to deal with the disclosure of any videos / digital footage which you might have in your possession.

I trust this email will provide you with sufficient notice to prepare for these matters.

Yours sincerely,

TO DAY, IN COURT, THE ENGLISH TAX PAYER'S very well paid CARDIFF QC, going through the motions of defending the South Wales Police, COMPLAINED OF HIS instructing solicitor's' publicity, a THOROUGHLY CORRUPT SOLICITOR, called ADRIAN OLIVER, of DOLMANS, WHO HAS PROTRACTED THIS CASE FOR nearly 20 YEARS purely for CASH, INSTEAD OF ACCEPTING MY BRISTOL LAWYERS original suggestion TO SETTLE.

Adrian Oliver is now pictured in 'rogue's gallery, on many web sites, across the world, a warning of what is to come if he gets away with it.

Along with a similarly debased South Wales Police 'puppet', also with out stretched avaricious hands, the wayward forensic psychiatrist, rumoured to have once worked at Caswell Clinic , Bridgend, Adrian Oliver is now before a similarly debased piece of nonsense for, without the ' too ill' Williams for protection on my original police MAPPA classification, pleading anything between them to have me locked away in a psychiatric prison for life, Oliver will face his predestined nemiscis

Does it stink?

Adrian P. Oliver

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/South-Wales-Police-Conspiracy-to-Have-me-Shot.aspx

Senior Partner

Dolmans Solicitors

SWP Schedule Defendant witnesses 4th week.pdf

SWP Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirk final.pdf

Dear Poorly Informed Tax Payer,

GUERNSEY, Channel Islands, is where I set up a ‘legal aid’ charity and first learnt to 'cut my teeth' on the current subject now unfolding at last, after twenty years, in Cardiff's Civil Justice Centre. It is HM Partnership's 'cosy relationship' as Lord George Foulkes once put it, the ‘incestuous relationship’ between both executive and judiciary, all protected within it by 'Royal Charters'.

.The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon's immunity to prosecution is the classic example when still refusing to ‘convene a court’, contrary to statute, simply to consider my numerous applications, over the last nine years, for my name to be returned to the veterinary register. [See the past twelve years of ‘Down Loads’ and other ‘Blogs’ on this website].

Here, in 'Old South Wales', as dentist John Wilson in 'New South Wales' will quickly concur, 'Her Majesty's Prerogative' continues to allow rampant nefarious conduct in our UK law courts to flourish, compounded by outdated 'adversarial systems' once based on trust.

Take the ‘Musa Family Case’, as another typical example, currently on appeal, ‘we think’, where Haringey Council lawyers ‘cashed in’ on the act, again all immune to any HM regulatory retribution or HM prosecution in either our civil or criminal courts.

[The Nigerian couple are currently serving seven years imprisonment with all seven of their children now snatched and outrageously ‘re homed’ instead of just being put on the next flight to Nigeria].

The paranoia surrounding this tragic case was further revealed in the way I was jailed for ‘attempting’ to fly the kids home in my two seat WW2 Piper Cub and then being prosecuted, in my absence, as Cardiff’s judiciary would not even ‘produce’ me from similarly outdated prison system! .This old ‘Out of Court’ video, below, has been held back until now to be a stark warning of things yet to come both in England and Wales, if not already here.

Does it stink or does it stink?

EXPOSURE VIDEO of GUERNSEY, as an IRA safe house, drug dealer's dream, insider dealer's paradise and where the incestuous island's De Vic Cary's grand father collaborated, as Bailiff, with the Germans, enough for Churchill intending to have him hanged, was the same little b+stard who jailed me 21 times, anything to prevent education on 'basic human rights' to be intoduced to a two teir structure his masonic mates and the serfs.

http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM

http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx

While in Wales,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y

We still have a Dr Tegwyn Williams 'at large', on 'long term sick with his wife,' on my account, despite falsifying yet further 'victim' statements

11 11 15 Solicitor letter to Cardiff Magistrates.pdf

12 08 20 MJK MG11 Redacted shr.pdf

Much more about NHS (Wales) multi million conspiracy, later.

In Cardiff County Court this Month

Lantwit Major's police sergeant 'Killer' Kilberg, one of many in the 1990s police force, who had my name removed from the veterinary register is caught out lying to the currently presiding judgere along with a few others already heard and shortly to also give evidence.

Enclosed is a 90s Barry police station custody video of Kilberg lying to the custody sergeant that I was in breach of a public order offence despite the custody sergeant specifically asking for that clarification.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellin QC or the police QC, during the three months civil action currently in session in the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, asked for clarification on exactly the same point with the South Wales Police sergeant qualifying the issue by stating the custody sergeant made the mistake when writing down the facts.

The truth of the matter was his partner, PC Gareth Holmes was right there, seen on video and refusing to support the deliberate lie either by recording it in his pocket note book or in his subsequent MG 11 witness statement.

Llantwit Major Police Sergeant Kilberg Video to follow

http://youtu.be/eBkNCYYfJOE

Meanwhile a letter of more importance, if 'testicles on a plate without an anaesthetic' is to be avoided, to the only others in Wales, apparently, responsible for maintaining law and order throughout The Principality........

13 03 31 to CPS NHS.doc

AND this latest thoroughly insulting bit of nonsense from Cardiff's magistrates, court concerning the police refusing to return some £10,000 worth of antique guns and a walking stick confiscated in 2009/10 while desperate to get me a 10 year mandatory prison sentace for 'trading in prohibited weapons '!

Such as the WW1 Lewis machine gun, the most effective such weapon in the war and was bolted to my, now sold, replica DH2 RFC biplane fighter, an aircraft, like the September 1940 Hurricane, that turned the tables in 1916, just at such acute points in two world wars.....b*stards

13 03 28 Shot Guns and Muskets MagistratesCase Stated Response.pdf

ARE WE DEALING WITH EVIL HERE?

Masonic Devil Worship?

Dolmans, Cardiff solicitors,

You either settle or or I publish ex Chief Inspector' Jenner and ex Ely police station's Inspector Roe's recorded evidence denying , as did the b*tch of bitches, Barbara Wilding, by sworn affidavit, denying the knowledge of court cases and her ordering the use of a sledge hammer and a crow bar to break into my Cardiff veterinary surgery just to put back Jenner's daughter, Alison, effectively putting trouble and druggies back into my overhead flat .

Your client also had me put in Cardiif prison, for four days, pretending you vermin could not 'recognise' me!

Your client had the machine gun painted a different colour to try and fool a Cardiff jury

Your client had me up for speeding when in possession of the photograph of the true driver, his name adress and when I arrested CPS lawyer Stoffa the police ran a mile , in the wrong direction

Your client repeatedly had me arrested on the road side following a purported positive breath test only for there to be a zero reading within 20 minutes on the police stations' ' definitive test' machine.......any filthy trick to aggrevate and proke a victim.

Do I appear drunk in this Bridgend police custody video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzSPSX-hVEE.

Your client, in 'Operation Orchid' tried to snatch our then ten year old child, using social services, bullying my then wife to signed a pre prepared witness statement that I was insane.......you evil bunch of lawyers conspired with NHS' Morgan Cole, solicitors to use Dr williams to have me arrested by armed police helicopter but failing to get a conviction or steel our daughter but instigated immediate divorce proceedings ....the thought of spineless tactics I should of expected

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JdcyhiC3e0&list=PL0A52598AD5E0C099

As lawyers you advised Barbara Wilding to have me registered MAPPA level 3

Your client, with your advise, then had Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams of Caswell clinic, to have me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act without a shred of evidence and without even examining his patient, for one purpose.....to delay this three month trial ever coming to court!

Oh, yes and what is the latest? Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams falsifies another police victim statement, in july last year, having me locked up for weeks in prison until the CPS then get involved to prepare for another rigged Cardiff judiciary jury trial.

And what did the CPS find? Dr Williams' circa 21st July 13 'victim' statement record? I had been around to his home and had harassed both he and his wife, Dr Janis Hillier causing the police to 'move me on'...utter bollocks,,,I do not even know or wish to know, other than to arrange a private prosecution 'procedure'as to where the fat over paid 'toad' lives.

Oh yes, I almost forgot....four times I have been to the police stations to complain and written long statements but your client, you advise them, ignore him , he will not live much longer.

Two sets of lawyers, one from England and one from Cardiff, have asked both the police and the CPS for a copy of that July 13 victim statement but they both reply....."it cannot be found"

Just for starters...... and we now move into two months of more fun or is it Romans chapter 12, verse19, is it?

Why is your client continuing to ignore the seriousnes of Christopher Alexander's (alias Ebbs). statement of yet anopther south wales Police conspiracy?....Worried it might be true? But you lot can continue to steal another huge chunk of tax payers' hard earned cash if you 'string it along' just like my seven or so listed Actions against your client. Remember, police officer Rice told the court he had no knowledge of Ebbs/Alexander or recognise him standing at the back of the court.

12 10 26 Ebbs Staterment.pdf

Your clients' collusion with Cardiff masonic devil worshiping judges had my web site closed down, last time, when we got a little too close to the truth about your disgusting money making regime but try it again and the articles will spring up on 10 other already primed web sites positioned abroad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0gQc1mveKg

Your client ran to the protection of Judge Nicholarse Cooke QC and got it following His Honour's receipt of the following 'jury note' of a flagrant conspiracy by the South Wales Police caught red handed' by the jury!!! That aborted 'dangerous driving' case must be heard also in the next few days, I presume?

Punitive Damages

Punitive DamagesInEnglandand Wales, exemplary damages are limited to the circumstances set out by Lord Devlin in the leading case of Rookes v Barnard:

Oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional actions by the servants of government.
Where the defendant's conduct was 'calculated' to make a profit for himself.
Where a statute expressly authorises the same.

Rookes v Barnard has been much criticised and has not been followed in Canada or Australiaor by the Privy Council.^[7]

Another case that could arguably be seen as an example of punitive damageswas that of Attorney-General v Blakein which the defendant profited from publishing a book detailing his work for MI5. The details were very old and therefore did not cause loss to the state. The publishing was, however, in breach of the contract of employment (and incidentally criminallyin breach of the Official Secrets Act 1911). The defendant was required to give an account of his profits gained from writing the book.

Thecourts have been very reluctant to follow this approach,^[9]emphasising the materiality of the criminalelement required for these damagesto be considered.

2) aggravated damages

"Aggravated damages are compensatory in nature, while punitive damages are awarded as punishment for egregious conduct....

Published Mar 31 2013, 10:29 AM by Maurice Kirk | [Edit Post]

Two Stolen Lap Tops and a huge store of documents and film lost in one winter.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/guest_blogs/archive/2012/10/23/163-500-reward-for-return-of-stolen-computor-barry-south-wales.aspx

That lap top was stolen from outside my old Barry veterinary surgery, last October, together with vital evidence in a red canvas hold-all.....never returned.

A short video of 'Liberty Girl' on a beach on the top of North Island, New Zealand just before her world record to Brisbane, Australia

_Z052.MPG

12th DAY STOP PRESS> JUDGE'S ORDER BANS WEB SITE PUBLICATION of BARBARA WILDING Sworn 2009 Affidavit witholding Investigations & denying even Knowing of Court Cases or Police ever Breaking into My Veterinary Surgery !

Maurice — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:11:00 GMT

12 th day seemed to be taken up arguing about what cannot go up on my website.....interesting when you think that there is 100% silence by the Welsh press with the this order being handed down preventing me from publishing startling documents from Leighton Hill, the force solicitor about Barbara Wilding and just what orders were given out and those that should have been given out in 2006.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo

Tomorrow we have, to give evidence, after my six times being stopped, arrested, jailed or just reported , for driving whilst disqualified, a police officer who appears to have doubted the police computer!

So why had his previous custody officers or inspectors, in charge of Barry police station, checked this out or had they ‘milked that little scam’ far enough? Bearing in mind, during that short period, south Wales Police had ordered my production of my driving documents thirty five times and made nothing of the fact the vehicles I seemed to be astride were nearly all registered in the names of past aviators and aviatrix.

Five police and ex police, for tomorrow may turn out to be forgetful or have a sudden bout of ‘selective amnesia’.... we will wait and see.

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

BUT it is all really about next week's Criminal Court of Appeal in Cardiff, on 14th March13, when the conduct of Caswell Clinic staff are once again in the spot light

with the current politics of lawyters syphoning off huge sums of tax payer's money pretending to protect the NHS , do you expect an imparial tribun ial?

Come to that also, may I suggest and balance its content with this three month trial as it may be a warning to you all of what a special gentleman wrote about, back in the 40s/50s, of the year1984 and 'Animal Farm', both fascinating reading.

BS614159 Kirk V South Wales Police 12.07.11 Proceedings 3.pdf

Come on, don’t be frightened, come and witness your South Wales Police, tomorrow and every day for nearly three months.

YOUR police force, is in the dock, again, not me for a change, as public servants with police quoting apparent utter lies as said in Barry magistrates court or have you not appreciated just why we fought TWO WORLD WARS? Not fought for the Tony Blairs of this world to allow a THIRD WORLD WAR to take over our country without even a shot being fired?

I AM REFUSED THE RIGHT TO PUBLISH ON WEB SITE TODAY'S POLICE INCRIMINATING DOCs>>>>>> AND RIGHTLY SO!

My 4am appaisal, on 13th day of the facts eventually coming out , put along side what is to yet come, indicates, to me, Maurice may cause the real risk of 'contamination' of future policeman witness evidence if these new documents are not just saved to put to future and now, a number of past witnesses all needing to be recalled.

BUT when will common sense prevail? I am not holding my breath

MORE POLICE DOCUMENTS NOW COME TO LIGHT from the force solicitor.......Dated St David’s Day, 2013

I have court indication, yesterday, I cannot publish as it seriously contradicts Barbara Wilding's 25th Feb 2009 sworn affidavit, ordered by HHJ Chambers QC, produced 6 weeks late by Dolmans, who clearly drafted it, led to my MAPPA level 3 registration, under Barbara’s personal command and backed by a rogue Caswell Clinic psychiatrist, to state I had 'significant brain damage’ and therefore must not be allowed to cross examine in courts,

In the police 1st March 13 document the force lawyer lets slip information, about the four times I was arrested & twice reported for ‘driving whilst disqualified’ when clearly the Barry police had been told to ‘lean on me’ after police officer Booker had received from GUERNSEY my much circulated 'voluminous schedule of previous convictions.

I have kept fairly quiet in cross examination, so far, on the countless well over one hundred incidents of my being a ‘victim of crime’ once word was out to the pond life of Barry I was fair game for a source of drugs, motor bikes and personalty.

Police were systematically were told , from Police Central Command , to give me a hard time......using Guernsey’s tactics of arrest on any spurious motoring matter they can muster.......once locked goad , annoy him , prod him with a stick and we might manage a ‘resisting arrest ‘ or ‘a common assault’, anything to ridicule him publically so he goes bankrupt.

Cause 24/7 surveillance so, if he squeals, no self respecting person with an animal will dare arrive at his Barry Veterinary Hospital for fear of also being targeted by such a corrupt police force stuffed with automatons.

Solicitor Leighton Hill, force solicitor, has disclosed Barbara Wilding ordered former Inspector Sydney Griffiths, in circa 2006, not to investigate the Cardiff incidents ‘as they were not in the Vale of Glamorgan’!

This allowed Dolmans to then deny knowledge of Sgt Roe smashing his way into my Cardiff veterinary surgery on or about 3^rd July 1995, with a van load of coppers, just to put a pilice inspector’s daughter back into my flat

This allowed Dolmans to then deny knowledge of my being stopped in Cardiff and prosecuted for failing to have insurance...as it was yet another set up of theirs that went ‘pear shaped’.

‘I know nothing’ was the order of the day from high command. Only rely in the witness box on those facts written in your personal note book.....do not ‘recall’ anything else, under cross examination or it may open the flood gates and the conspiracy will collapse

Wilding’s orders to then Inspector Sydney Griffiths allowed the Cardiff police to have me locked up in Cardiff Prison, in 1993, as 'not identified' never going to the Police Complaints Association and CCRC with the full facts

£1000 REWARD for witnesses who can furnish information that can be used in oral evidence