Search results matching tags 'South Wales Police' and 'Hunger Strike'

WHY I AM ON HUNGER STRIKE & Forensic Analysis of Cardiff's Predetermined Conviction Policy

SabineKMcNeill — Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:42:00 GMT

It's not dated, this letter, but it arrived on 15th February - in a very torn envelope - with other documents dated 1st February 2014: WHY I AM ON HUNGER STRIKE:

Cardiff Court and prison conditions are, putting it bluntly, an abuse of process.
3rd May 2012 Cown Court (Breach of Restraining Order). The prosecutor, for the Crown, admitted still having District Judge John Charles' hand drafted 1st December 2011 Restraining Order that was before many witnesses before it was taken to my cell for possible approval. I was never served with the final typed version.
On 24th September 2013 the same prosecutor applies to Crown Court asking I cannot cross examine him in the appeal from my arresting him for not disclosing, following my need for proof it ever existed!
My 'common assault' conviction, for the 'private arrest', should have been heard on 14th October 2013, but I was arrested, anything to slow down my civil claims. His applications included, not just the appointment to have Cardiff appointing a barrister 'on my behalf' but also the judge was to be from outside South Wales and Magistrates from no district bording MS from Swansea to Chepstow. So, who can I not have my trials and other appeals ...?
The heart of the matter is the unlawful manner in which I was gaoled for 7 months over an antique machine gun and when that was doomed to fail try instead to get me sectioned for life in a secure psychiatric hospital.
I remain on hunger strike until conditions improve.
i) McKenzie Friend be allowed to take notes from a Litigant in Person.
ii) I am booked, as promised, more than once, to see a neurologist.
iii) After 3 months of asking to have a table in my cell.
iv) The Cardiff Court moved my last appeal to England. So why cannot be, irrespective of the fact Bristol promptly unopposed it?

This list is far from exhaustive.

The envelope also contained this forensic analysis of Cardiff's Predetermined Conviction Policy:

My name was removed from the Veterinary Register reliant primarily on two common assault convictions involving the South Wales Police assured of predetermined verdicts with no reprisals.
In the Cowbridge Show incident the Crown Prosecutor was not allowed to give evidence but wrote to the Disciplinary Committee stating that had he been made aware of the full facts stated, it was the Police Inspector who 'struck the first blow'.
In the Aircraft Engineer's incident he was the only witness. The currently stayed BS614159 civil damages claim resulting from Police persecution between 1993 and 2002, contained evidence on oath relating to an incident IPCC (Wales) refuses to investigate. It is that South Wales Police crossed the river Severn to persuade the engineer to significantly alter evidence.
Examples from my antecedent history:
24/06/10 Contempt of Court 28 days relating to judge's promise to release 2/12/09 medical records;
24/08/11 Threat to Kill Lord Mayor £50 fine re Police changing machine gun colour;
01/12/11 Harassment of Psychiatrist 18 weeks re 02/12/09 fabricated MAPPA level 3 records;
01/12/11 Fail to attend Court 'no penalty' despite valid medical cert. and legal representation;
02/12/11 Public Order £75 - 1 day (served) re Nigerian Musa six children snatching case;
02/12/11 Fail to attend Court £50 - 1 day (served) Authorities conspire to not produce me from Cardiff prison due to Haringey Council / McKenzie Friend withheld evidence;
04/05/12 Breach of Restraining Order 9 months re 1st Dec 11 Order never served in cells;
25/06/13 Assault on Crown Prosecutor 'conditional discharge' re withheld draft order;
10/12/13 Assault on Prison Officer (A20140005) 3 months re theft of my passport.
'Evidence of Similar Fact'
All the above and pending March 14 Jury trials are 'all tarred by the same brush'. For example see Download transcripts and in particular full sequence of machine gun arrest to acquittal, Judge Bidder QC? 02/12/09, 17/10/13, 03/01/14, 07/01/14 and Newport Crown 23/01/14 transcripts all on www.kirkflyingvet.com;
14th November 2009 Recorder of Cardiff's Orders for 1st Dec 11 harassment conviction is similar to the deliberate delay of the prison officer appeal (see 10/12/13 clerk of the courts notes) celebrating the signing of ECHR Convention.

As publisher of Victims Unite I find it 'interesting' to observe how Maurice as one victim turned starfighter and McKenzie Friend experiences in one life time what others experience 'jointly': corruption in the Police, falsification and non-disclosure of evidence in Courts, breaches of all rules and the complete prevention of advancing legal proceedings as a Litigant in Person whilst held in prison.

I watched it with Melissa Laird and the Musas. What do they have in common? Child snatching, since Social Services always rely on Police officers to do the snatching.

Just in case you believe in the virtue of the Police, do look at www.exposedpolice.com and ways of falsifying crime statistics.

HM Crown Prosecution Service (Cardiff) & Police 'Cannot Find' Dr's Victim Statement for GMC, IPCC, CCRC, MP or ECHR while Civil Trial continues on 3rd April

Maurice — Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:33:00 GMT

This is just typical of how I have been treated for more than 20 years in South Wales!

BEATEN UP IN FULL VIEW OF OVERHEAD CAMERA

These 5th April 2000 police are to be cross examined every day next week starting Wed 3rd April in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre at 10.30am.

Police officers at the scene as well as at Roath and Rumney police stations with Osborne giving false evidence at the 2002

PC 1215 Robert Osborne

PC 3689 Gareth Price

PC Mick Carter

PC Steve Coles

And this scandalous incident is facing cross examination in the following week, rumour has it

A sample documents in sequence of the jibberish uttered by those ultimately responsible, HM immune to prosecution, for what goes on in Cardiff courts EVERY DAY

It was an absolute pleasure and I was proud to be before His Honour Judge Peter Jacobs, each time, the only judge, incidentally, in about 20 years of my life in that putrifying environment who actually awarded me bus fares etc from the CPS, never handed over, as opposed to the Griffiths Williams and Hickenbottoms of this world, a couple of scum bags if ever I knew one.

It was a sad day for Cardiif when this judge left the circuit for England directly after this hearing!!

Just plough your way through these three documents, please, as an example of what really goes on in our courts at tax payers' daily expence and never checked by any one!

(A random pick from five, no less, lever aarch files of some thirty odd court appearances as police are desperate to have me struck off and without a driving licence)

01 10 04 Judge Peter Jacobs Judgment.pdf

01 03 19 Judge Peter Jacobs Ruling.pdf

02 04 15 Cardiff Crown Court Ruling_0001.pdf

And don't miss this random 'pick' off my then new website that caught the eye of Lyle and NancyCambell of Phoenix , Arizona, 'aviator and aviatrix extrordinaire' who went on to sponsor my flight to australia by WW2 Piper Cub!

01 06 02 D Colin Davies series of redacted off 001 web site.docx

South Wales Police, out of shear spite, reported this 'failure to supply a specimen of breath' to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons because, since 1993, the police had lost around eighty criminal allegations against me out of ninety but in this case,using their influence on the judges to ban my web site for fear this video other proof of bullying would be broadcast world wide, doubled their wickedness by repeatedly ignoring His honour Judge Vosper qc's orders to disclose custody records.

This video was only released once I was convicted and banned with out evidence, of course, being called.

Come to the Wednesday hearing and watch Price, Osborne et al account for themselves lying again?

the Privy Council ruled the RCVS £60,000 bill, for my losing the appeal in Downing Street, was 'cumulative' for the motoring convictions sited to have my name removed from the veterinary register for life.

Horsey Lightly, solicitors, were paid off only this week to expedite/avoid what was to be an ugly divorce hearing all this week indicating fraudulent valuations by both Cowbridge and Llanwit Major estate agents

Your Client: Kirsty Kirk

Our Client: Maurice John Kirk

We thank you for your letter dated 18 March 2013 the contents of which we note and for which we are obliged.

It may or may not be of relevance to the outcome of the ancillary relief proceedings, but if our security on Mr Kirk’s property at 49 Tynewydd Road, Barry alone or in combination with whatever beneficial interest he may have in The Marlpits, is insufficient to meet Mr Kirk’s liability to this firm in full, it is our intention to issue a petition in bankruptcy against Mr Kirk.

We are aware that 49 Tynewydd Road is being marketed for sale, but we do not know the value of the prior charge secured against the property.

Yours faithfully

Horsey Lightly

jdevlin@horseylightly.com

Despite thousands of pounds paid up front, from prison (machine gun), this extra was added for 'an abuse of process'

Judgment dated 1/2/11

Principal sum : 25,612.54

Interest at the judgment rate

From 1/7/10 to 26/3/13 = 999

days @ 5.61 5,604.39

Order dated 17/8/11

Under paragraph 4 : 214.00

Under paragraph 8 : 2,200.00

Interest at the judgment rate

From 5/10/11 to 26/3/13 =

538 days @ .53 285.14

Total: 33,916.07

Interest continues to accrue at the rate of £6.14 per day.

Despite the Privy Council's ruling of 2004 Their Lordships were minded , in 2011, to state Horsey Lightly, solicitors, seven pages of draft 'grounds', for my around 5th annual application for re enstatement, was 'an abuse of process'

shear lawyer greed?

It all stinks, doesn't it?

Now, Readers, interest yourselves with the Cardiff Crown Prosecution Service, always 'hand in glove' with the police when it is supposed to be impartial---------another very Welsh trait based on inherent deceit.

This is another example, NHS(Wales) this time, yet another example of South Wales' wide spread nafarious conduct always protected by gangs of tax payer paid lawyers answerable to no one.

Head of Dept,

Crown Prosecution Service 28^th March 2013

Cardiff CF10 FIRST LETTER

Dear Mr Dickson,

Falsified Forensic MAPPA Level 3 Medical Records

Re: Request CPS Review ‘all’ conditions so a Restraining Order does not set me up to fail?

Thank you for your letter 20 March 2013. My 22 January 2013 letter is to vary “all” conditions. I understand that the CPS previously proposed the following sorts of conditions in 2011 and so it follows we vary the past CPS draft proposals to seek a proportionate response:-

I can agree not to contact Dr Tegwyn Williams. [I have instructed private detectives to locate Drs Williams and Hillier’s home in order that there may not be a repeat of my last summer’s vindictive imprisonment following his false ‘victim’ statements].

I agree not to disseminate any untrue information with regards to Dr Williams.

That the Order end on………Date?

As Dr T Williams is not at Caswell Clinic and has not been there for a very long time it would seem wrong to deny me my rights and liberty of access to my NHS clinic.

It is also normal NHS procedure, after being an inpatient (sectioned or otherwise), that if he is confused, unhappy or seeks reassurance regarding what has occurred and/or is written, that the patient is to return to the same clinic to discuss issues with the same ‘group’ of clinicians.

Under the Data Protection Act the same clinicians are to update the records to make all that they have ever written to be fair, true and accurate. Clinicians not at Caswell in 2009 cannot address data. It must be the team at Caswell. There were over twenty writers in the three months of my team assessment or forced unnecessary and unlawful incarceration.

Dr Williams and his lawyers are accused of abuse of power and workplace bullying where the Caswell team wish to build a relationship with me. If I name a good genuine clinician, who will help me, will Dr Tegwyn Williams and his lawyers then bully that clinician not to help?

I cannot now name any helpful good clinicians for fear of them receiving a repeat bullying.

You mention that Morgan Cole, solicitors, say that there is no facility to conduct tests for brain damage at Caswell Clinic when Dr Tegwyn Williams seems to say there is, in that Caswell Clinic is the host to commission and deal with investigation of specific issues of brain damage effecting behaviour relevant to MAPPA level 3 forensic psychiatry.

Why, then, did Dr Williams ask the Crown Court to section me first to Caswell Clinic and then to Ashworth Prison if not to determine the presence or absence of brain damage?

Why does Dr Williams avoid clarifying whether I have significant irreversible brain damage?

His last summer’s false ‘victim’ statement, police countersigned, means the CPS recognises Dr T Williams is not without blame when dropping all charges. So is the CPS now proposing to vary my Restraining Order to that of a more proportionate one or do I appeal to Europe?

Yours sincerely

Maurice Kirk BVSc

Copy to: GMC,MP, IPCC, CCRC & ECHR

28th March 13

FAO CPS Cardiff

Second letter Why will neither South Wales Police nor Cardiff CPS produce Doctor Tegwyn Williams' victim statement for the IPCC/CCRC and my MP and that of his wife's, also dated July 2012, falsly complaining of being harassed at their home?

I enclose further video evidence of blatant conspiracy to pervert the course of justice this time by Police Sergeant Kilberg lying on oath before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, a few weeks ago, just as he did in 2002, before the Royal College of Veterinary surgeons to have my name removed from the veterinary register.

Enclosed is a 90s Barry police station custody video of Kilberg lying to the custody sergeant that I was in breach of a public order offence despite the custody sergeant specifically asking for that clarification.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellin QC or the police QC, during the three months civil action currently in session in the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, asked for clarification on exactly the same point with the South Wales Police sergeant qualifying the issue by stating the custody sergeant made the mistake when writing down the facts.

The truth of the matter was his partner, PC Gareth Holmes was right there, seen on video and refusing to support the deliberate lie either by recording it in his pocket note book or in his subsequent MG 11 witness statement.

Just when is this expensive NHS/ police South Wales scandal going to come to an end and the true culprits brought to trial or do my friends and myself do it ourselves?

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Puits aux Papillions

49 Tynewydd Road St Doha

Barry CF62 8AZ 22230 Merdrignac

UK 07907937953 Brittany

www.kirkflyingvet.com

mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

www.wacl.org.uk

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Dear readers,

Back to this Wednesday's trial........

As usual it is all about 'disclosure of evidence' so if the police can withhold names of witnesses, custody records and police personal note books etc then they usually have you 'buttoned up' and 'up a creek without a paddle' in any subsequent criminal or civil proceeedings.

A case in point is next Wednesday's hearing, where the police witheld the overhead Newport Road, Cardiff, video until I was convicted.

I visited, by court order, to serve yet another copy of it on Dolmans, solicitors, acting for the Defendant , the Chief Constable of South Wales Police only to receive the following:

Deliberate Failed disclosure including denying even court cases took place

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/South-Wales-Police-Conspiracy-to-Have-me-Shot.aspx

Dear Mr Kirk,

I refer to the videos which you purported to send to Melanie Standley on Monday 25 March 2013.

I have been unable to open the ZIP files which you have sent and have asked my IT team to investigate the same. My IT team advise me that you have used the Windows Movie Maker program to seek to transfer the files to us. However, what you have sent us is not of sufficient size to include any movie footage. Whilst we cannot open the files, the file type which you have sent are: .wlmp

I am advised that these are project data files created by movie maker and not the actual footage and that this explains why the files which you have sent to us are so small.

As such, we are unable to view the footage which you had purported to send.

I would be grateful if you would attempt to re-send the files, but this time, to myself at this address.

I have copied this email into Rosie Pahl in case the court has the same issue.

Yours sincerely,

Adrian Oliver.

25 Mar (4 days ago)

Dear Mr Kirk,

Attendance at our offices

I refer to your and anticipated attendance at our offices at approximately 4:55 pm on Friday, 22 March 2013. I record that you entered the reception area of our offices despite having previously been advised that your license to attend our premises had been revoked and that you would be trespassing if you entered our premises.

This decision was not taken lightly, but was based upon our previous reasonable requests for your dealing with matters by e-mail and correspondence and the fact that it had been necessary to ask for police officers to attend our offices due to your refusal to vacate the premises on a prior occasion. In addition, you have made several unwarranted indications of your intention to effect a citizen's arrest upon me personally. I have no wish for my staff to become embroiled in any issues relating to your expressed intention. I am also aware that you have distributed leaflets relating to myself which are inappropriate and inflammatory.

I would be grateful if you would abide by the indication which has been provided to you. If you continue to seek to enter our premises, then it will again be necessary for us to involve the police.

Your purported reason for attendance at our offices

You indicated to the person who dealt with you that you are seeking to attend regarding VHS cassettes and a DVD and that you are seeking to draw attention to discrepancies between the same.

The person who dealt with you indicated that he would not be able to assist in this regard, but you indicated that he would be returning to our offices at 4:00 pm on Monday, 25 March 2013.

Your need to comply with a court direction

A direction was made by the court on 13 March 2013 that you were required to produce by 4 pm on Friday 22.3.2013 the videos which you have in your possession by email and that those which you did not have in digital form, were either to be supplied to the court in digital form, or if not practicable, to be lodged with the Court by that date, for the particular attention of Mrs Rosie Pahl.

It is clear from this direction that the intention was that you should lodge any relevant tapes or digital copies with the court, rather than this practice. In particular, we are alert to the fact that you have suggested to the court that this practice cannot be relied upon to produce appropriate copies.

The court has made it clear that the court is to take control of any documents which you produce. You are therefore reminded of your obligation to provide any relevant material to the court as directed by the court.

It is noted that on Sunday 24 March 2013 you directed an e-mail to Melanie Standley of this practice (who is absent from the office this week) providing a link to a “you tube” site. It is noted that you also referred to videos having been stolen from your vehicle.

Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail.

Yours sincerely,

Adrian P. Oliver

Senior Partner

Dolmans Solicitors

Yesterday, 28th March, I returned before 4pm and attempt to serve videos, they already have, in a different format but was blocked at the door with no one accepting the videos causing me to haildown a police officer to witness it for the trial judge on wednesday.

With revolving door barred and this police officer, in attendance, giving me friendly advise, I left with the damning evidence of Sgt Kilberg's lies that had my name removed from the veterinary register.

GUERNSEY, Channel Islands, where Maurice 'cut his teeth' on the current Welsh subject of HM Partnership's daily corruption at the ignorant tax payers' expense.....a video so apt....

http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM

Remanded in Cardiff Prison Until December

admin — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:24:00 GMT

Maurice has been remanded to Cardiff prison until 4/12/09 when he will be heard by another judge over his fitness to plead.

Cardiff Crown Court Demonstration

admin — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:06:00 GMT

Police have said they will arrest anyone who demonstrates outside Cardiff Crown Court on Thursday 1st October where Maurice Kirk is due to appear to decide whether or not to detain him indefinitly under psychiatric observation.

Court Transcripts

admin — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:48:00 GMT

Transcripts of Maurice's numerous court appearances at Cardiff Crown are now available in the download section. Please click here.

These cover proceedings from 25th June to 30th July regarding his arrest and incarceration just prior to him about to take South Wales Police to court over long term harrassment.

Further transcripts are due to be sent over and uploaded.

Taking Food Again?

admin — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:08:00 GMT

Yesterday (04/08/09) I visited Maurice, prison number AK6632, at HMPS Cardiff. He is very thin and is feeling weak. He did not think that he would be able to walk from the healthcare block to the visiting area at my next booked visit (Saturday). He seemed resolute and as astute as ever, but did not answer me when I asked how much longer he intended to carry on refusing food.

I told him that it is likely that he will be sectioned under the Mental Health Act for 28 days "for assessment". He, as I, strongly believe that there is no creditable reason that he should be sectioned.

Maurice is an oustandingly intelligent man of principle with a fierce sense of justice. He is an irritant to heavy handed authority and is being treated inhumanely. He is sometimes contraversial, incredibly focused and very stubborn. Psychiatric wards will be filled very quickly, if these are admittance criteria.

I have been told this afternoon (05/08/09) that Maurice is taking food again. I have been unable to verify this as no-one was available to speak to me at HMPS Cardiff. Noone has returned my calls. I have telephoned the Ministry of Justice and been redirected to the department that deals with offenders' cases. Before I can be told whether my husband remains on hunger strike I must pose my question in writing. Presumably I will receive a response within 28 days.

Similarly, I have requested information regarding blood and urine tests carried out this past week. I must apply in writing. 28 days is too long to wait for a response in these circumstances. Maurice is ketotic and possibly already suffering some renal damage: drinking water but barely/not urinating.

I have contacted Maurice's preferred psychiatrist to try to arrange an independent opinion - he is on holiday until September. I am keen to contact a psychiatrist outside this area who might be able to assist or recommend a colleague.

I hope to get more information soon.

Kirstie Kirk