Search results matching tags 'South Wales Police' and 'Her Majesty's Prerogative'

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Protected by Royal Charter so Sale of Maurice's 5 Bedroomed House not even covers RCVS Legal Costs

Maurice — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:25:00 GMT

Investigation into Royal Charters

EXPLICIT ORDER

These orders specifically require ministers and judges* to treat the chartered body ‘in the most favourable and beneficial sense' for its ‘best advantage.' This is to be done despite wrongdoing, specifically including ‘non-recital' (concealment) and ‘mis-recital' (deception).

The 1967 Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Act omits ‘mis -recital'

A Number of European Court of Human Rights Applications are currently being prepared in Brittany now that Maurice is struggling but ‘out of the woods, medically and well off the daily morphine!

‘A Royal Charter' is the common thread between the South Wales Police, in 2001, making complaint to have Maurice struck off the veterinary register, for life, just for questioning ‘authority' through the courts and a recent Criminal Court of Appeal Judgment, Regina v Maurice Kirk , for ‘Contempt of Court', currently applied for to go to the Supreme Court as the hearing appears contrary to Article 6.

Dr Tegwyn Williams, in August 2009, was employed by Wales HM Partnership to fabricate false medical evidence, for which he had no qualifications, to have Maurice incarcerated, without trial, in a high security hospital, possibly for life. His medical reports stated Maurice having, ‘significant brain damage and possible tumour'.

Each Royal Charter affecting the ten judges, including the Recorder of Cardiff, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, who three times, alone, refused bail on this medical evidence, that Maurice was too dangerous to be released, can be read on transcripts on this website Downloads.

The Court of Appeal Judgment is likely to refuse permission for the case to go to the Supreme Court due to the fact the ‘argument' with HHJ Cooke QC , in Cardiff Crown Court, a year earlier, had before him the now proved falsified medical evidence, proved by other medical reports, then withheld from His Honour, including a clear brain scan of August 2009 organised by Williams, no less, as Director of the Caswell Clinic prison, Bridgend!........

.......this document will expand on a weekly basis until all Royal Charters , affecting Maurice's life, have been appropriately exposed to the general public as a warning of what is yet to come.

copy of HCHR applications shortly and any help in preparation always appreciated.

Happy Easter

House of Lords May Meeting on the British Judiciary Brought Forward

Maurice — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:01:00 GMT

Attention everyone, the meeting has been brought forward due to over subscription needing a larger committee room. Contact organisers or me for details.

1966 Veterinary Surgeons Act is admitted to be contrary to the European Convention of Human Rights. 1967 Royal Charter, imparting college immunity to prosecution, many also deem to be 'ultra vires' and should therefore go back before Their Lordships of HM Privy Council. Meanwhile, the college even refuses to 'convene a court', contrary to 2004 Statutory Instrument, to allow Maurice Kirk BVSc to 'practice veterinary surgery'. Finding any lawyer to do any of this, of course, is quite another story!

The European Court has warned Maurice it will refuse any further application relating to this Royal Charter or continuing conduct of the RCVS. This coincided with Her Majesty's Attorney General applying to have all his court files confiscated from the Western Circuit with the view of having him certified as a 'Vexatious Litigant'.

The RCVS obtained an Extended Civil Restraint Order to smother the truth. He is banned from the Cardiff County Court building, having served seven months in jail only to be aquitted, not even having tendered a defence.

See Downloads

NOTES FROM DIARY

Maurice — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:51:00 GMT

Remand Prisoner Kirk BM8473

HM Prison

Cardiff

South Wales

NOTES FROM DIARY

Tuesday 03 November 2009

CRIMINAL PROCEDURES (INSANITY) ACT 1964

0853 PO refuses to inform me whether it is police, probation or lawyer booked in for 9am for 2 hours 15 minutes. Refuses to indicate which (7) court case, which files to carry to visitors compound. ‘Until you get there cannot tell you'.

0914 Different PO states it's a psychologist from High Security Ashworth Psychiatric Hospital Liverpool. I repeat I need proper notice, proof of identity, tape recorded and/or independent witness. (All in writing to authorities on countless previous occasions)

Refuse? No.

0915 Locked up in cell. Write hurried letter to Dr?

0918 Medication called. Let out to medical orderlies - refused again, diclofenac tabs for arthritis (8^th day). Queue dominated by prisoners for either methadone and/or screaming to be sent to Caswell Clinic!

0940 Original PO refused who/why Dr from HM Ashworth?

Locked up.

SO and PO explains psychiatrist from Ashworth from Court order of 26 October (HHJ Eleri Rees)

I hand letter to SO to copy and deliver to Psychiatrist, stating I am not refusing, I require a minimum of 24 hours notice, taped, witnessed.

‘This is my 9^th psychiatrist' signed.

0952 Copied and returned.

10.30 Dr at cell with healthcare manager to ‘assess fit to plead and stand trial'.

XE on who is behind all this abuse.

Dr admits never experienced a case re ‘fit to plead' but ‘not fit to stand trial without legal representation'.

Seen explanation on my website? Dr answered (later)

Seen my medical records neither I nor my GP can get? Dr answered (later).

What law are they trying now ‘because they failed miserably on Section 35 1983 Mental Health Act? Dr answered (later)

10.50 Dr. court can say ‘not fit (no challenge of Dr William's 4 psychiatric reports or release of my medical records)

11.08 Are you fit to instruct any lawyer?

Dr promises ‘bundle of papers' from Crown Court. I explain I have had all these sort of promises from Cardiff Judges in the past and invariably ‘a pack of lies'.

I won't get it, meaning all the correspondence between Judges and CPS and Caswell Clinic and HMCS and MAPPA and Justice Ministry and other gulags in South Wales (Whitchurch and Llanarth Psychiatric Hospitals, Swansea and Cardiff Universities, where so many previous psychiatric reports originated).

I ask Dr. did you actually ask to see my medical ‘history'?

Reply ‘They could not find MJK medical records.

Dr: How did all this start?

Suggest he read my 64 page witness statement dated 19 June 09 written ‘just for an occasion as this' once I realised all the South Wales Police had left, following the signing of the Chief constable's 25 Feb 09 sworn affidavit.

Documents given to Dr.

2003 HM internal memo by Treasury Solicitors and HM Attorney General Re: Vexatious Litigant.
Caswell Clinic internal memos (also see website)
MJK 19 June 09 witness statement. For civil action Re Covert Police Surveillance
Chicago USA, Psychiatrist Report in Rebuttal (off website)

Dr: Have you ever threatened violence?

‘I was picked for public school 7 aside rugby finals at Twickenham'

Both Caswell Clinic and Cardiff Court refuse to remove falsely reported conviction of ABH on their record just as the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons in 2002, laboured under false information, again supplied by South Wales Police with ‘intent'.

I ask the Dr "where is the element of ‘intent' in my current predicament now facing an IPP prison sentence of indeterminate length for public protection?"

"For public protection or for yet another Judge, on 2 December, at last quashing my Civil Action, on 10 January 2010 and blocking the machine gun case, never ever intended to see the light of day?"

11.32 Dr leaves cell a little better informed stating he needed to return.

Every cloud?

Maurice In County Court

Goose — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:04:00 GMT

Tuesday 28th July - Maurice has been taken to County Court today (handcuffed) r.e. his civil case.

It was adjourned again.

He did not have the necessary papers as he was not aware of this hearing until yesterday

He is continuing to refuse food to protest against his only option of appearing in court is by video link rather than in person.

He is very appreciative of letters that he has been receiving.

Maurice’s physical health is not good, he is 64 years old and should have been given bail as per Barry Magistrate's decision on 24th June (ie 5 weeks ago) prior to appeal by the CPS.

It is inhumane that he is being held in this manner. Maurice has been examined by a psychiatric team as directed by Judge Cook. We are not aware of any conclusions drawn.

Kirstie Kirk

Yorkshire Ripper Enquiry & Barbara Wilding South Wales Police Similarity

Maurice — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:48:00 GMT

See 'Most Recent' download.

This leaked HM Treasury Solicitor internal memo, one of many, may be an indication to the UK tax payer as to just what it costs while those in the UK judiciary continue to enjoy immunity to prosecution due to the 'Royal Prerogative'.

HM Treasury Solicitor and Crown Prosecution Service have no fear, of course, over their appearance tomorrow to defend the HM Home Secretary in Cardiff Court hearing for my false imprisonments.

Jack Straw, HM Minister of Justice, remember, arranged for Article One, the binding article, of the 1948 European Charter of Human Rights to be omitted from our 1998 Human Rights Act making it quite ineffective and a farce.

While my parliamentary representative, John Smith MP and his colleagues continue to swear allegiance to the ‘Royal Prerogative' our journey to Paris on the 6^th Dec, in an old red London double-decker bus, to join 60 years ECHR Celebration, will be all the more worthwhile.

While The Yorkshire Ripper associated trials unfold it makes one wonder just how many other HM agents, such as those pulling the strings in the South Wales Police and RCVS, for example, are also given immunity and have behaved in a similar fashion to our current lot in London over the years?

John Smith MP Esq.,

House of Commons, Westminster.

27th November 2008 Your ref: K/2002

Dear Mr Smith,

Abuse of Process Application-Cardiff County Court 25^th November 2008

Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police

Further to my last letter of the 22^nd November matters have turned somewhat for the better.

A day in court on Tuesday eventually commenced an Abuse of Process Application causing the judge to order Barbara Wilding, Chief of the South Wales Police, to sign a sworn affidavit that there has been full disclosure in my 16 year on going action for damages.

Remember, the police deny a court case took place involving 9 months of surveillance, the police broke into my surgery with a crow bar and they told a court they did not know who I was and had me locked up in Cardiff prison for 4 days until I was ‘identified'.

Further, the police must reply to my requests concerning well over 39 incident reports currently withheld from me as they will undermine their defence for losing around 121 charges brought against me due to vindictive malfeasance.

I will not be holding my breath......

The Home Secretary has still failed to disclose in court today any of the investigation she has admitted has been going on for at least 5 years to have me certified as a vexatious litigant. My application under both the Data Protection Act and Freedom of Information Act is being side lined as the lawyer for Jacqui Smith now says I can only have what he has 'in his office'!

If you again examine the HM Treasury Solicitor internal memo I sent you you will see all defendants, South Wales Police and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, have been in close communication for years with the HM Attorney General's Department without my knowledge affecting the very process of my, almost daily, court decisions. Clearly an Abuse of Process.

Now, do we have that meeting this year or not?

Yours sincerely,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

See 'Most Recent' download.

Home Secretary, South Wales Police and RCVS in Cardiff Court 25th November 10.30 All Invited

Maurice — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 07:54:00 GMT

In Cardiff Court, yesterday, I found a judge, at last, who appeared to 'grasp the nettle' and ordered HM to disclose the reasoning behind the 5 year, still ongoing enquiry, to certify me as a 'Vexatious Litigant'.

The litigation was first ordered by HM Attorney General following information laid by both the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and South Wales Police, the latter being the original complainant to have me struck of the Veterinary Register and so lose income to fight them.

I have been denied, ever since, any Section 31 Disclosure on this other than leaked HM ‘internal memos' between various Whitehall departments and HM Treasury Solicitor who, only yesterday, denied any knowledge of what was behind it all. I told the HM lawyer he was either mistaken or a blatant liar.

All my court files and tapes of hearings in the past 10 years appear were with the HM Treasury Solicitor while HM Court Service denied all knowledge, knowing full well files were lost. HMCS even prevented my barrister being briefed with the ‘remaining court files' in order for him to address the Court of Appeal for me to have a Trial by Jury in my 15 year running South Wales Police Harassment Cases.

Cardiff Court even say the critical October 2002 court tape, vital for 25^th November 2008 Abuse of Process Application, is destroyed......utter nonsense.

Both Data Protection Act and Freedom of Information Act served on the RCVS also proved a complete farce. SEE DOWNLOADS www.kirkflyingvet.com & www.wacl.org.uk

Last week's 6th Refusal by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to even allow me to make an Application to the college committee,to be re instated as a veterinary surgeon, contrary to the 1966 Veterinary Surgeons Act, may well now gel the previous confusion in this case experienced by so many web site readers from around the world. We sincerely hope so. My family and I are now entering the 16th year of litigation and serious hardship.

As much as they will try RCVS lawyers will never be able to change the 'truth' of the original facts withheld from the 2002 Trial and their continuing reliance of 'Her Majesty's Prerogative' and 1967 RCVS Royal Charter will only further undermine the original purpose of 'due process of law' and the right of any British citizen to a fair trial.