Search results matching tags 'South Wales Police' and 'Abuse of Process'

Lord Justice Moses caught on VIDEO Refusing re Dr Tegwyn Williams' Falsifed Medical Records Conspiracy to obtain My IPP Imprisonment

Maurice — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:07:00 GMT

Royal Courts of Justice, today...What a load of nonsense. The Appeal before Lord Justice Moses et al, was today!

"No, Mr Kirk, you cannot have an oral hearing ....we have already decided to dismiss your Appeal" (arguing with Cardiff judge, Nicholas Cooke QC, who damned well knew Williams was lying nor had the qualifications to try and section me to Broadmoor, on his interpretation of an NHS brain scan!

Now RCJ judges are in on the act.

Imagine that approximate account of what was said in front of Rear Admiral rtd. Norman Scarth Esq. provoked?!

The pandemonium in number 9 court, with utterances of truth only from the well of the court, leading to eight security guards, ready to drag out two old men must be published see video here:

A Den of Evil - Maurice Kirk & Norman Scarth in court 28/6/2011

Anarchy is just around the corner and it starts at Cardiff Magistrates tomorrow at 10 am. and then across the country

See new photos on Gallery.

A Bradford judge sent Patrick Cullinane to prison for four months simply for using an audio recorder in court.
If Lord 'Justice'(??) Moses had any guts he would have stayed in court, called security to take us down to the cells & then sent us to prison, as Patrick was. Instead, while the next case was supposed to be proceeding, he, Mr Justice Maddison and Leeds Recorder all scuttled out like frightened rabbits, leaving the pathetic female usher to act as though she were God Almighty!
Norman Scarth

Criminal Charges against Barbara Wilding, Dr Tegwyn Williams and Adrian Oliver: Royal Courts of Justice 28th June 10.30 court 9 & Cardiff Magistrates 29th June10 am

Maurice — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:28:00 GMT

Criminal Charges

Barbara Wilding, ex-Chief Constable of the South Wales Constabulary

On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Adrian Oliver and other persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009, for His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, knowing it to be false, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On a day between 1^st June 2009 and 25^th June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown and by laying false information before Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) meetings, you attempted to murder Maurice John Kirk knowing it to be unlawful and contrary to Criminal Attempts Act 1981.1.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Chalice, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of a prohibited weapon, one WWI Lewis machine gun, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of ammunition, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On or about 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Orchid, you did harass Maurice John Kirk and/or Kirstie Louse Kirk and her daughter, indicating social services may remove Genevieve Kirk from the family unit when knowing the reasons to be false and contrary to section 2 of the Harassment Act 1997.

Adrian Oliver of Dolmans, solicitors, Windsor Place, Cardiff

On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Barbara Wilding and other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009, following the Order of His Honour Nicholas Chambers QC, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.
On a day between 19^th and 20^th June 2009 in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the laying of information, namely, threat to cause criminal damage,knowing it to be false and causing Maurice John Kirk to be arrested, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police Forensic Psychiatric Unit, Bridgend, South Wales

On a day between 8^th June and 17^th December 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of psychiatric reports of Maurice John Kirk knowing them to be false and written without the necessary qualifications, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.
On 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court in the Vale of Glamorgan South Wales, with Richard Thomlow, Crown Prosecution barrister, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the laying of information before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, knowing it to be false, namely, that Maurice John Kirk had significant brain damage and a possible brain tumour and recommending he be sent to a high security psychiatric hospital for an indeterminate period.

FAO Their Lordships
Royal Courts of Justice
London

Contempt of Court Appeal

Anarchy is just about to take over

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2009/03/03/12-police-charged-over-lynette-white-murder-case-91466-23052198/

HM Court Service (Cardiff) continue their Dirty Work

Maurice — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:48:37 GMT

Para 1.

In this magistrates case it was done by a local solicitor on the Applicant's behalf, he being in France recovering from major surgery

The High Court judge was deliberately misled by HM Court Service (Wales) one, when it was three different District Judges that had sat on each of the three hearings, making the JR refusal absolute nonsence...but who cares?

The judge was told I was legally represented in the original substantive hearing, the subject of appeal, what a load of.nonsence. I employed no one to represent me,on 2nd november 2010 bed ridden in Brittany on daily morphine.

The district judge refusing a rehearing NEVER saw the five medical reports accepted by the earlier district judge, for an ajournment. Just another example of evil games played by HM Court Service (Wales) to mislead visiting judges from England.

Para 2.

How on earth do you appeal to Crown Court when you have not yet been sentanced?

You have little chance of winning an appeal in Cardiff Crown Court, if originally refused the earlier summary hearing. From someone who has won more than eight or nine Crown Court appeals, I know. Based on the simple premise that prosecution witnesses have difficulty in remembering how to lie twice, accurately, makes the High Court judge's opinion open to debate.

Para 3.

As to the suggestion of transfering the case to England the reader must be aware that the writer has attempted that for years!!!!

Maurice was told all Judicial Review applications must first be filed in the Welsh system, like both Criminal and Civil appeals, lately. On applying you ask to have it heard outside such an incestuous environment.

again, This year, he was told, for all of his outstanding cases, from Royal Courts of Justice, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre and Cardiff Crown Courts, that his appeals have to be first filed in a Welsh court

WHY?

Wales is frantic to have its own judiciary like Scotland so it is much easier to milk the tax payer!!!

I seriously wonder if this visiting English judge actually saw any of the appeal papers, by what is written on download judgment. Scribbled up, more likely, in some back office of Cardiff magistrates to prevent further exposure of Wales' diabolical short comings.

In this case it was done by a local solicitor on the Applicant's behalf, he being in France recovering from major surgery

Magna Carta Day,15th June, Public Demonstation, Leeds County Court -- 'Right to Private Prosecutions' Meeting 12 Noon

Maurice — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:08:00 GMT

Adrian Oliver of Dolmans Solicitors has been the Solicitor of South Wales Police and is the MasterMind behind "defending" all bullying incidents, the cumulative harassment and the multi-organisational collusion under the label MAPPA.

See 'HM Conspiratorial Partnership' in Cardiff magistes courts as an example of blocking Private Prosecutions here:this document.

"Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power, be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law must provide a speedy remedy. Otherwise the victims will find their own remedy. There will be anarchy."

Lord Denning: 1982

WANTED

(Picture on gallery or Downloads)

Following posters, shortly,on gallery

Judge T M Hughes QC

Judge Morris

Judge Vosper

Judge Llewellyn Jones

Judge Elleri Rees

Judge Gareth Jones

Judge Neil Bidder QC

More Cardiff Judges to come

IN THE CARDIFF COURT

Maurice Kirk Appellant

Chief Constable of South Wales Police Respondent

Particulars of Claim

1. The Defendant is and was at all material times the chief officer of the South Wales Constabulary and the police officers hereinafter referred to were at all material times acting under the direction and control of the Defendant in the performance or purported performance of their functions. 2. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft.

3. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 aeroplane and ‘gun' from a private collection with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' as an integral part of the fuselage.

4. 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This became the critical argument in the trial.

5. 2000: The DH2 with the same Lewis antique was flown by the Claimant at the Farnborough Air Show by invitation of Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame.

6. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' dismounted.

7. 2007: The DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out, by the RAF, to a civilian for further repair in Hampshire.

8. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and gun to another display pilot who modified the gun for his own purposes.

9. On 25^th February 2009 the Defendant signed a sworn affidavit knowing it to be or ought to have known it to be, false in that paragraphs, between14 to 21, contained erroneous information, namely, incidents, involving both the Defendant and Claimant, had occurred

10. Following the 2008 Court Order by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, for the Defendant to sign an affidavit that full disclosure of evidence, under her control, had been disclosed to the Claimant, the latter entered the Defendants solicitors offices, on or about the 25^th February 2009 complaining the court order had not been carried out.

11. The Claimant, upon receipt of a copy of the Defendant’s affidavit entered Barry Police Station and was both videoed and interviewed at length following his complaint that the Chief Constable had knowingly signed a false affidavit to avoid disclosure of evidence relevant to the nineteen year running civil action for damages, CF101741 + three others..

12. On 1^st June 2009 the Defendant caused the Claimant to be subjected to Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) enquiry following a meeting, at the South Wales Police Head Quarters, Bridgend, by the Independent Advisory Group.

13. On 8^th June 2009, at Barry police station MAPPA meeting, police informed the agencies that the Claimant was to be arrested and taken into custody for being in possession of a prohibited weapon.

14. The police also informed the agencies that should the Claimant approach the Chief Constable then he was likely to be shot.

15. On 15^th June 2009 the Claimant brought further civil proceedings, in the Administrative Court, London, against the Defendant when police were called to be in attendance.

16. On 18^th June 2009 the Claimant again laid the complaint, this time at the offices of the Defendant in her Bridgend head quarters .and again, refused mutual exchange of witness statements.

17. On 19^th June 2009 the Defendant again refused to exchange witness statements when her solicitors were contacted by the Claimant despite the court order having given until 4pm.

18. On 20^th June 2009 the Defendant’s solicitors laid complaint against the Claimant to be arrested for threat of criminal damage.

19. On 21^st June 2009 police Operations, ‘Orchid’ and ‘Chalice, caused’ a sizeable force of police officers to surround the Claimant’s home, in St Donats, Vale of Glamorgan, requiring an armed response unit, a police helicopter and both forensic psychiatrists and a lay advisor for the Claimant to be in attendance. The operation was aborted once the Claimant was seen drinking tea with his family in their front garden.

20. The English police refused to ‘touch it with a barge pole, once they became aware that the Welsh police had persuaded the Civil Aviation Authority to telephone the new owner, in England, to dismount the Lewis antique and alone drive it across Lincolnshire and beyond to find a licenced arms dealer where it would be collected by the Defendant.

21. The Welsh police then hawked the Lewis antique nearly two thousand miles around the UK, contrary to Home Office Regulations during which time had it modified, to be illegal, contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act at their special laboratory in South Wales.

22. On 22^nd June 2009 police returned to the Claimant’s home and arrested him in the road outside his property, cautioning him that he had been arrested for: a. Threat of committing criminal damageb. Being in possession of a prohibited weapon c. Being in possession of prohibited ammunition.

23. The Claimant was never charged with the first arrest allegation and despite court orders from His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC to reveal the evidence and statements by Dolmans, solicitors, falsified to assist their client, the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Ms Barbara Wilding.

24. Between 22^nd and 23^rd June 2009 the police removed the Claimant’s lawfully held shot guns, ammunition and court files relating to the Claimant’s ongoing Claims of bullying, harassment and false imprisonment none of which have been returned to the Claimant.

25. On 24^th June 2009 a police officer or officers laid an information against the Claimant at Barry Magistrates court alleging that that the Claimant had been in possession of a prohibited weapon, one 1916 Lewis machine gun and had sold the gun, both contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

26. Upon reading the Claimant’s June 2009 64 page Defense statement the Barry Magistrates court, following legal advice, allowed the Claimant unconditional bail.

27. On 25^th June 2009 the police appealed the court order lying to HHJ Hughes causing the Claimant to be detained in custody in Cardiff prison.

28. Lies by the Defendant were used, eventually, before ten Cardiff Crown Court judges, no less, refusing the Claimant disclosure of evidence, under their control, that would have cleared the Claimant’s name.

29. In July 2009 the Defendant brought a third indictment namely, ‘income from crime’.

30. On 3^rd August 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams, forensic psychiatrist and Director of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police forensic Unit, at Bridgend signed a psychiatric report recommending the Claimant be sectioned and further remanded to his medium secure psychiatric unit, Caswell Clinic, under Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act.

31. In September 2009 when it was clear the Claimant was not going to employ a lawyer sworn to the Welsh courts Dr Tegwyn Williams recommended that the Claimant be transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, IPP, imprisonment for Public Protection.

32. On or about the 24^th October 2009 the Claimant was further remanded in custody in Cardiff Prison reliant on a further Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric report the Defendant knew or ought to have known was false.

33. On 9^th February 2010, at Cardiff Crown Court, the Defendant having earlier withdrawn the third indictment, was found not guilty on all remaining indictments and was released from custody.

34. No defence evidence or summing up was needed from the Claimant with further confirmation by nine members of the jury confirming to him that their decision of ‘Not Guilty’ was already concluded by eleven of the jury after the first day of evidence was given and cross examined.

35. The jury also made the Claimant aware, immediately after the hearing, that they questioned why both the original seller to the Claimant, of the Lewis antique and the current owner were not both also in the dock as defendants.

36. The Claimant’s complaints to the relevant police authorities, to investigate the conduct within South Wales Police before and after his arrest and nearly eight months in custody, have been swept aside in a perfunctory manner to which the Claimant is accustomed since first settling in south Wales in 1992.

37. The arrest and detention of the Claimant were unlawful.

38. There were no reasonable grounds to believe that the Claimant was probably guiltv of the offence for which he was arrested. 39. The decisions to arrest and detain the Claimant were such as no reasonable police officer would have reached.

40. The Claimant was detained for longer than was reasonably necessary and in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

41. Further, the actions of police officers set out above constitute harassment within meaning of section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and misfeasance in public office.

42. Unless restrained by the Court police officers will continue to harass the Claimant.
43. By reason of the matters aforesaid, the Claimant has suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety, damage to his reputation and was deprived of his liberty. He has been subjected to bullying, malicious prosecution and harassment, false imprisonment and contrary to the 1998 Human Rights Act.

44. The Plaintiff therefore claims of the Defendant:- Damages Exemplary damages Special Damages. Costs. In pursuant of Sections of the County Court Act 1984.

45. The Claimant retains his right for a lawyer to amend this Claim.

Time to Take to the Streets

Maurice — Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:18:29 GMT

Anarchy is just around the corner.

Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion... in private self-defense.
John Adams

And what did Lord Denning say?

“ Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power, be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law must provide a speedy remedy. Otherwise the victims will find their own remedy. There will be anarchy.”

Lord Denning: 1982

Dr Tegwyn Williams a NHS Liar and NHS Fraudster

Maurice — Fri, 13 May 2011 11:16:51 GMT

Downloads shortly of evidence

Thousands of WANTED posters, DEAD or ALIVE and proof will be scattered by aircraft across Wales and the South of England in the coming months

Manager

Cardiff County Court

17th May 2011

Kirk v Dr Tegwyn Williams

£800 claim for four futile visits to Caswell Clinic attempting to obtain copy of medical records

Dear Sir,

A Mr M Bowen informed me that he attended the last court hearing as my Mackenzie Friend, in March, to find HM Court Service had ONCE AGAIN interfered with justice this time by withholding documents from the judge that I had sent due to my inability to attend.

Had Mr Bowen not had the foresight of the games Welsh courts seem to play with me and had already photocopied my pleadings, that the case should be stayed, to be moved to a higher court, the judge would not even have known about it!

One such document that was not read by the judge, in the time available, his anger for HMCS interference being obvious to all in the court room, is yet to be confirmed.

I have therefore lodged a Judicial Review Application with the Administration Court for the purpose of Their Lordships, outside South Wales, becoming more aware of the clandestine behaviour so often metered out by HMCS in South Wales.

Enclosed my 10th March position statement following the court hearing needing your response

Leaked internal memos, enclosed, between the manager of Cardiff Civil Justice Centre and the HM Treasury Solicitor is but one example of your apparent unlawful conduct to pervert the course of justice.

Please identify the document, to which I refer, in order that there is proof of all this for the Court of Appeal and explain why the judge was not supplied with my comprehensive pleadings by HMCS, sent to your office days before the hearing by e-mail?

Yours

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

European Court of Human Rights Application

Maurice — Thu, 12 May 2011 09:30:21 GMT

A sample DOWNLOAD of just one of our Royal Charters and 'HM Partnership' abuses, now so rife in our British law courts.

The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon's unique conduct, on one of its members since 1844, was to prevent re-instatement of a previously 'struck off' veterinary surgeon, thereby preventing him to obtain both the falsified evidence and withheld favourable evidence by Penningtons, solicitors and the College's own ‘in house' lawyers, the Registrar and Deputy Registrar.

At the original 2002 shambolic hearing not only were relevant defence witnesses denied, but the college deliberately used a ‘legal assessor' clearly not ‘fit for purpose'.

Welsh Only Arrest Warrant

Maurice — Tue, 10 May 2011 06:59:00 GMT

Interesting, isn't it: that as long as I do not cross the Severn Bridge into Wales, I will not be arrested? I have confronted the English police again today. Maybe the content of this Judicial Review explains?

Just like the Welsh police having me jailed for nearly 8 months on a trumped up charge of 'trading in machine guns'. There the English police also washed their hands of the nonsence refusing even to arrest the new machine gun owner. So the Welsh used him as a prosecution witness instead.as I faced a mandatory 5 year prison term for each charge before my Cardiff jury..

Not everybody knew but the gun, an antique Lewis, had been changed from decomissioned, as I sold her, attached to a replica WW1 DH2 fighter biplane flown at Farnborough, to a working prohibited weapon, contrary to the 1968 fire Arms Act.

The Welsh police therefore telephoned the Civil Aviation Authority, who in turn asked the display pilot and four others with old aircraft, to 'unbolt their guns' and drive through the country, alone to deposit them with any gun smith! The Welsh lot then transported her, unlawfully (contrary to Home Office Regulations) nearly 2000 miles, hawking her around England and Wales to fabricate my 10 year term, if evil Dr Tegyn Williams, Caswell Clinic Director Bridgend, failed to convince Cooke, the Recorder of the Cardiff Crown Court and 9 others, also refusing me bail, that I was too dangerous for release (if I won).

Despite the facts known, Welsh police left me at large for months to get the opportunity to have me lawfully shot (see leaked MAPPA minutes).

If it had not been for a little help from my friends around the world, commenting on this blog site, publishing the facts on Nicholas Cooke QC and Dr Williams, they may well have achieved Williams' request, that I be sectioned for life to reside in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric prison.

Williams stated I had 'significant brain damage', possible brain tumour, with no qualification to do so, while Welsh NHS are continuing to allow him to do this to others, less fortunate than me.

This Welsh cabal is still at large, on a whim to hatch any further abuse of process on an unsuspecting citizen so stupid to expose their patch.

letter to Cardiff Magistrates today:

2nd Nov 2010 Cardiff Magistrates Judicial Review Application

10th May 2011

Clerk of the Court,

1. I am still asking for the details of just what went on during my forced illness, protracted by Dr Tegwyn Williams of the South Wales Police Forensic Unit, by his criminally conducted false medical reports without the qualifications so to do?

2. Why were my medical reports not put before the district judge ?

3. Why will you not inform me of the names of the witnesses?

4. Why will you not inform me of evidence, by sending copy of clerk's notes?

5. Why has it taken you 6 months to answer my request for the identification of the judge in question?

6. Other requests in my 3rd Nov 2010 letter to the clerk still remain unanswered.

7. Do you now accept you received it?

8. Will you now answer it?

9. The Crown Prosecution Service state they do not oppose a rehearing with Defence present.

10. I wish to know when District Judge Allan Berg is next sitting in Cardiff in order to arrange a hearing.

Thank you

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

. .

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Protected by Royal Charter so Sale of Maurice's 5 Bedroomed House not even covers RCVS Legal Costs

Maurice — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:25:00 GMT

Investigation into Royal Charters

EXPLICIT ORDER

These orders specifically require ministers and judges* to treat the chartered body ‘in the most favourable and beneficial sense' for its ‘best advantage.' This is to be done despite wrongdoing, specifically including ‘non-recital' (concealment) and ‘mis-recital' (deception).

The 1967 Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Act omits ‘mis -recital'

A Number of European Court of Human Rights Applications are currently being prepared in Brittany now that Maurice is struggling but ‘out of the woods, medically and well off the daily morphine!

‘A Royal Charter' is the common thread between the South Wales Police, in 2001, making complaint to have Maurice struck off the veterinary register, for life, just for questioning ‘authority' through the courts and a recent Criminal Court of Appeal Judgment, Regina v Maurice Kirk , for ‘Contempt of Court', currently applied for to go to the Supreme Court as the hearing appears contrary to Article 6.

Dr Tegwyn Williams, in August 2009, was employed by Wales HM Partnership to fabricate false medical evidence, for which he had no qualifications, to have Maurice incarcerated, without trial, in a high security hospital, possibly for life. His medical reports stated Maurice having, ‘significant brain damage and possible tumour'.

Each Royal Charter affecting the ten judges, including the Recorder of Cardiff, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, who three times, alone, refused bail on this medical evidence, that Maurice was too dangerous to be released, can be read on transcripts on this website Downloads.

The Court of Appeal Judgment is likely to refuse permission for the case to go to the Supreme Court due to the fact the ‘argument' with HHJ Cooke QC , in Cardiff Crown Court, a year earlier, had before him the now proved falsified medical evidence, proved by other medical reports, then withheld from His Honour, including a clear brain scan of August 2009 organised by Williams, no less, as Director of the Caswell Clinic prison, Bridgend!........

.......this document will expand on a weekly basis until all Royal Charters , affecting Maurice's life, have been appropriately exposed to the general public as a warning of what is yet to come.

copy of HCHR applications shortly and any help in preparation always appreciated.

Happy Easter

Alerting Welsh Ministers to the State of NHS Wales

Maurice — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:40:00 GMT

Carwyn Jones AM
First Minister
National Assembly of Wales

Edwina Hart AM
Minister for Health and Social Services
National Assembly of Wales

23 March 2011

Dear Mr Carwyn Jones AM and Mrs Edwina Hart AM,

Re: My Welsh Operation will now be in France. Is this the best future for Wales?

Important New Evidence that tests the State and Future of Wales NHS.

Mr David Sissling leaves as the local Chief Executive at ABMU LHB to be Chief of the Welsh NHS in May 2011. Edwina Hart as Welsh Health Minister and Mr Win Griffiths as Chairman ABMU LHB were being very helpful by seeking Mr David Sissling to address my concerns.

However, is it your place to intervene on the bigger issues and policy effect on the culture of the Welsh NHS, by whether the future NHS Chief Mr David Sissling's approach is appropriate, for the people of Wales to have confidence in the oversight by Welsh Ministers?

"Clear Evidence" of Brain Damage/Cancer - Available Facts about Dr Tegwyn Williams:

1) It appears, especially given his constant refusal to comment, that Dr Tegwyn Williams decided this brain damage existed without using any appropriately medically qualified doctor to allow or support his conclusion.

2) Yet it seems, when not using anyone medically qualified to progress such a view, that in 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams wrote to the Crown Court to say that there is "clear evidence" that I have brain damage. Furthermore that the brain damage (that Dr Tegwyn Williams says exists) is supposed to also, according to Dr Tegwyn Williams, give an incurable condition leading to an unhelpful behaviour change, so to support that I may need to loose my liberty indefinitely, when I have never been convicted of any relevant or serious offence.

3) Furthermore, Crown Court transcripts of 2 December 2009 record a Crown Prosecution Counsel, Mr Twomlow, saying that Dr Tegwyn Williams wishes his concern about my having brain cancer to affect the decisions by the Crown Court.

"No" Brain Damage, "No" Cancer: by Two Sets of Evidence from both France & Wales.

4) In August 2009 properly qualified medical doctors at the Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend and later, in Southampton University, give an ‘all clear' brain scan result.

5) Yet, Dr Tegwyn Williams asserting brain damage or cancer means that my urgently needed hip operation cannot occur until surgeons are certain of what conditions may exist. Limited disclosure of records only added to confusion and delay as Dr Tegwyn Williams refuses to clarify about brain damage and cancer.

6) In February 2011 properly qualified medical doctors in France did a new brain scan and concluded also an ‘all clear' brain scan result.

Questions I ask be answered:

1. Do six Medical Opinions that contradict what Dr Tegwyn Williams says and his refusal to comment, adequately present a reasonable suspicion for the employer, Mr David Sissling, to act?

2. Why is there inaction to protect minimum standards, when ‘to be seen to act', the employer only needs to ask the General Medical Council to investigate to form their view?

3. Will this inaction justify more people to be forced to refuse to use a belligerent Welsh NHS?

4. Why is the future leader of the Wales NHS allowing and so supporting Dr Tegwyn Williams to behave as he does?

5. I am an Englishman granted Asylum in France in order to avoid Dr Tegwyn Williams' jurisdiction to use his opinion again to cause more harm or affect my liberty.

6. If I have to go to the additional strain of proving in the Welsh civil and criminal courts, by way of a private prosecution, that Dr Tegwyn Williams has acted dishonestly and maliciously, will my needing to so act spearhead that the Wales NHS uphold the basic minimum standards or will I inadvertently, as good as prove that Mr Sissling and therefore Welsh Ministers have abandoned important responsibilities and duties for which they take office and are paid?

7. My wife and daughter continue to live in the Vale of Glamorgan. Can I have your assurance the serious erosion of minimum standards in the Welsh NHS will be immediately addressed and rectified?

As you are both experienced and able politicians, I am sure you will welcome that I look forward to placing your reply alongside various comments on my website.

Yours

Copy to

Mr Win Griffiths, Chairman ABMU LHB
Mr David Sissling, Chief Executive, ABMU LHB
Media Wales
BBC Wales