Search results matching tags 'MAPPA' and 'NHS'

Machine Gun Case and MAPPA Disclosure 11th July 2pm at Cardiff County Court

Maurice — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:18:00 GMT

Roll up, roll up, see corruption in the raw!

While I was outside the Cardiff court yesterday, demonstrating with megaphone and posters, a relation of one of the machine gun jury, in January 2009, came up and said she was appalled at Judge Paul Thomas QC's conduct, he stating she believed it had been, "chaotic and bloody shambolic". I told him, knowing the taffia's real reason behind the trial, I could have been a mass murderer and I would still have got off!

Yesterday's e-mails from both Adrian Oliver, for machine gun case damages and Morgan Cole , for Dr Tegwyn Wiliams and Professor Wood false medical reports damages, both indicated frantic activity within the South Wales Police, to put both cases into the 'long grass'.

One or two more Welsh judges will oblige them, no doubt, to keep the truth from the general public

WANTED

Judge Paul Thomas QC

As Cardiff trial judge he refused me - my medication, my documents in cell below, bail, relevant witnesses, the right to cross examine relevant issues, the right to interview my own witnesses, to stop a hopeless trial, disclosure of the police fabricated conspiracy with MAPPA/FTAC, seeking IPP, that I was dangerous and in ‘possession of a WW1 decommissioned Lewis machine gun with live ammunition.

Jury decided verdict after first day of evidence

He refused the huge costs incurred

Evilness Personified

Published by Maurice Kirk www.kirkflyingvet.com

(Content of many WANTED posters to be dropped over Cardiff from a great height)

It stinks, does'nt it?

Come Witness More Corruption on the 11th July 2pm at Cardiff County Court

The conspiracy to having me shot or locked away for life, IPP, by the Defendant in this Monday's case, all surfaces in their very own made cesspit of evilness, known as a Cardiff court, changed, at 2pm.

Maurice pays for lunch and and sticky buns, in the intervals when the fire curtain comes down. That's if you can bear the stench, in the auditorium, in this local theatre of entertainment known as the Cardiff Justice Centre. 2pm

See video (in blog post below) of UK Law Lords scurrying out of court, last week, knowing these issues, to be raised on Monday, were, at last, before them, the method, to get it out of Wales, having been somewhat un-orthodox.

A general statement on behalf of "We the people..." who believe our government and law courts have undermined basic human rights and pledge to fulfil the promise of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is here.

MONDAY AGENDA

On Monday at 2pm police apply to court to put off my current machine gun one million pound claim until outcome of my 19 year running damages claim of police bullying ie 2years.

Also, today, my seperate claim against NHS, Dr Williams and Prof Wood falsified medical reports to get me to Ashworth High Security Prison has recieved in court an application by Defendants to stay also!.

Bearing in mind my private prosecutions in Cardiff mag are now subject to 'state a case' back at DJ Martin Brown and Bristol magistrates advise are back before judge Nicholas Cooke QC ,who you may remember,on 1st Oct 2009 throuout norman and myself, refusing me bail lying to you that the psychiatric report was correct..

Also 6 hours with police this week, repeating all complaints I generated when that evil Caswell Clinic, in 2009, run by Williams to fill his private clinics.

On Monday the trial judge is forced to make decision on whether I get MAPPA minutes of June 09 to Dec 09, not subject to PII, which reveals more of the conspiracy to get me to prison for life,unconvicted.

You shoukd be able to precict his behavioour after his last one which included I could not sue police3 for beating me up caught on over head camera (see videos).

There is much more I am not prepared to reveal just now

Application to a magistrates' court to state a case 5th July 2011

64.1.-(1) An application under section 111(1) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980(a) shall be made in writing and signed by or on behalf of the applicant and shall identify the question or questions of law or jurisdiction on which the opinion of the High Court is sought.

(2) Where one of the questions on which the opinion of the High Court is sought is whether there was evidence on which the magistrates' court could come to its decision, the particular finding of fact made by the magistrates' court which it is claimed cannot be supported by the evidence before the magistrates' court shall be specified in such application.

(3) Any such application shall be sent to a court officer for the magistrates' court whose decision is questioned.

Cardiff Magistrates
Cardiff
South Wales

5^th July 2011

Laying of Information against Adrian Oliver, Barbara Wilding and Dr Tegwyn Williams

An application under section 111(1) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980(a) is made to state a case before the High Court on the premise that Adrian Oliver drafted an affidavit for the County Court, having stated to the Cardiff County Court had full disclosure knowing the affidavit to be false for Barbara Wilding to sign it.

Further, for Barbara Wilding to have ignored the November 2008 Court Order, immediately handing in her notice as Chief Constable and then signing the 25^th February 2009 affidavit, knowing it to be false, was also a criminal offence.

To then employ medical staff, on or before 8^th June 2009, from her South Wales Police forensic unit, Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, informing them Maurice Kirk was likely to be shot but deliberately delaying his arrest was a criminal offence.

Once detained in custody, on the 22^nd July 2009 for police using Adrian Oliver to lay complaint, knowing it to be false, was a criminal offence.

The magistrate knew or should have known all three of the accused were all implicated if not fully aware, in over 130 criminal allegations brought by the South Wales Police of which as few as 12 had been found proven in local Welsh courts, was part of promised immunity to prosecution in the Principality, purely for profit.

The HM Court Service (Wales) and Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) were equally well informed, in that 29^th June 2011 magistrates court hearing with prima facie evidence of an apparent conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by all three accused and should or did inform the district judge accordingly.

Dr Tegwyn Williams was employed by police to falsify his first psychiatric report to MAPPA and IAG, on the 1^st June 2009, following Maurice Kirk's applications to the Royal Courts of Justice and elsewhere, in England, for an independent police investigation.

The magistrate had access to all this above information and documents already before him, with both the CPS, and HMCS in attendance together with Adrian Oliver, also an officer of the court, all bound, by oath, not to knowingly allow an ‘abuse of process' to be obtained in any England and Wales court of law.

For the magistrate to deliberately state the findings of Dr Tegwyn Williams, ‘significant brain damage', ‘paranoid delusional disorder' [belief Maurice Kirk believed police were bullying him] and ‘having a possible brain tumour' was, in itself, an abuse and a criminal offence.

Dr Tegwyn Williams neither had the qualifications nor the knowledge and when in possession of contrary evidence by experts, to have knowingly falsified numerous, some yet undisclosed, despite court order, psychiatric reports, to have Maurice Kirk sectioned to Ashworth high security prison for life, was a criminal offence.

Williams was aware such an attempt would prejudice Maurice Kirk's 19 year running civil damages claim against the police and nearly 8 months imprisonment, that Maurice Kirk was in possession of a machine gun, had been fabricated by Barbara Wilding for her own private purposes.

6 hours, today, with Cardiff police and visiting Cardiff Crown court, upon the advice of and English court, in Bristol, was a joke. HHJ Cooke QC repeating his arrogant deceit by refusing disclosure of my own medical records, he personally had ordered to get him sectioned, will again go before the Criminal Court of Appeal, London and will again be videoed for internet coverage to expose South Wales deceit riddled judiciary driven by avarice.

For police, today, to suggest Maurice Kirk report his complaint of ‘attempted murder' to IPCC is an insult to his intelligence, since they know he had already been there, countless times, bought the T-shirt and seen the movie.

Police, today, refused to investigate my complaints or refer them to the CPS but, instead, referred the documents to the South Wales Police HQ, Bridgend.

Gloucestershire police have already refused to investigate sending all the evidence to the villains.

Maurice Kirk makes application to pay £20,000 or whatever sum of money it takes, to a police officer, for the release of records relating only to him, created by IAG, MAPPA, Caswell Clinic, HM prison, Cardiff, Cardiff courts and Dr Tegwyn Williams thereby unable to be withheld, any longer, on the legal argument of Public Interest Immunity to be attempted in another thoroughly corrupt welsh environment, Cardiff County Court, on 11^th and 12^th July, before HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC.

All invited, lunch on Maurice Kirk, as usual.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Enclosed criminal charges before 28^th June 2011 Cardiff Magistrates Court

Criminal Charges

Barbara Wilding, ex-Chief Constable of the South Wales Constabulary

On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Adrian Oliver and other persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009, for His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, knowing it to be false, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On a day between 1^st June 2009 and 25^th June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown and by laying false information before Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) meetings, you attempted to murder Maurice John Kirk knowing it to be unlawful and contrary to Criminal Attempts Act 1981.1.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Chalice, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of a prohibited weapon, one WWI Lewis machine gun, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of ammunition, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On or about 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Orchid, you did harass Maurice John Kirk and/or Kirstie Louse Kirk and her daughter, indicating social services may remove Genevieve Kirk from the family unit when knowing the reasons to be false and contrary to section 2 of the Harassment Act 1997.

Adrian Oliver of Dolmans, solicitors, Windsor Place, Cardiff

1. On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Barbara Wilding and other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009,following the Order of His Honour Nicholas Chambers QC,knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

2. On a day between 19^th and 20^th June 2009 in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the laying of information, namely, threat to cause criminal damage,knowing it to be false and causing Maurice John Kirk to be arrested, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police Forensic Psychiatric Unit, Bridgend, South Wales

1. On a day between 8^th June and 17^th December 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of psychiatric reports of Maurice John Kirk knowing them to be false and written without the necessary qualifications, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

2. On 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court in the Vale of Glamorgan South Wales, with Richard Thomlow, Crown Prosecution barrister, did conspireto pervert the course of justice by the laying of information before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, knowing it to be false, namely, that Maurice John Kirk had significant brain damage and a possible brain tumour and recommending he be sentto ahigh security psychiatric hospital for an indeterminate period.

Criminal Charges against Barbara Wilding, Dr Tegwyn Williams and Adrian Oliver: Royal Courts of Justice 28th June 10.30 court 9 & Cardiff Magistrates 29th June10 am

Maurice — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:28:00 GMT

Criminal Charges

Barbara Wilding, ex-Chief Constable of the South Wales Constabulary

On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Adrian Oliver and other persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009, for His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, knowing it to be false, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On a day between 1^st June 2009 and 25^th June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown and by laying false information before Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) meetings, you attempted to murder Maurice John Kirk knowing it to be unlawful and contrary to Criminal Attempts Act 1981.1.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Chalice, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of a prohibited weapon, one WWI Lewis machine gun, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of ammunition, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On or about 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Orchid, you did harass Maurice John Kirk and/or Kirstie Louse Kirk and her daughter, indicating social services may remove Genevieve Kirk from the family unit when knowing the reasons to be false and contrary to section 2 of the Harassment Act 1997.

Adrian Oliver of Dolmans, solicitors, Windsor Place, Cardiff

On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Barbara Wilding and other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009, following the Order of His Honour Nicholas Chambers QC, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.
On a day between 19^th and 20^th June 2009 in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the laying of information, namely, threat to cause criminal damage,knowing it to be false and causing Maurice John Kirk to be arrested, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police Forensic Psychiatric Unit, Bridgend, South Wales

On a day between 8^th June and 17^th December 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of psychiatric reports of Maurice John Kirk knowing them to be false and written without the necessary qualifications, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.
On 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court in the Vale of Glamorgan South Wales, with Richard Thomlow, Crown Prosecution barrister, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the laying of information before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, knowing it to be false, namely, that Maurice John Kirk had significant brain damage and a possible brain tumour and recommending he be sent to a high security psychiatric hospital for an indeterminate period.

FAO Their Lordships
Royal Courts of Justice
London

Contempt of Court Appeal

Anarchy is just about to take over

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2009/03/03/12-police-charged-over-lynette-white-murder-case-91466-23052198/

South Wales Police sued for One Million Euros for Falsifying Machine Gun and Medical Evidence

Maurice — Thu, 26 May 2011 17:14:00 GMT

STOP PRESS

Welsh Court of Appeal Lost!

25% of original Damages Claim Struck Out....the highly sensitve political ones (see December 2010 site video)

'C'est un judgment bizarre', a Breton would say!

Immediate Thoughts on Receipt of 17^th May 2011 Court of Appeal Judgment, BELOW, Refusing Application to Appeal

A. Upon reading the judgment, who wrote it? Defendant's solictors?

B. Someone was back in London by the time the trial judge, HHJSeys LLewelyn QC, read the 'first' reasons realising the visiting judge had not addressed the main issues in dispute, namely, an exeptional case of bullying needing to be consolidated with stayed 4th ,5th , 6th Actions, including the new machine gun case, BELOW, referred to, extensively, in the Claimant's pleadings here LINK SKM

C. Who, then, wrote the 'second' reasons, as if an after thought explaining, maybe, why Cardiff court held back the decision, from the Claimant, for nine days?

D. Clearly, just using the 'struck out' list, below, as examples for the oral appeal shortly (London ), [ALL INVITED, DINNER, as usual, ON ME], is it blatently obvious either MR JUSTICE KITCHIN is also being bullied by 'HM Partnership' or was he never given the facts, on appeal, of the forty odd incidents listed in the first three Actions? With Cardiff manager's track record nothing would surprise me.
There can only be one truth - no matter whose hands it's in...
Maurice J Kirk

1. Stolen Cheques

The thief was identified by the Claimant in Barry Post Office during 2010 Claimant's Application to HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC, in the Lower court, for Permission to Appeal. Both the court and police were informed of his whereabouts, by the Claimant but the Defendant again refused to investigate when his address was traceable from the post office. And a High Court judge now says the South Wales Police have no 'duty'!......With over a hundred incidents of this type of wicked conduct, within the seven or so Actions! Just how many does it take for a policeman to be culpable?

Mr Kitchin knows, to amalgamate cases further risks prison for high ranking South Wales Police.

That's HM Partnership's real 'Reasons' for yet another typical example in our British courts in 'meltdown', not to be published in newspapers.

'Struck Out' due to 'Collateral Attack' on a conviction obtained during an incident

2. Police Caught on Overhead Roadside Video [See it on video Gallery, 5th one back]

Despite police refusing to disclose videos of Claimant being 'beaten up' in Cardiff police cells, the original magistrates and Cardiff Crown Court were not even being allowed to see the overhead road side video because police withheld its disclosure until a year too late.

[The police cell videos were doctored, blanking out the top half of film to hide police identity]

Now the Appeal Court judge did not view the video either! Mr Kitchin undoubtedly argues 'police beating up their prisoners' is 'not relevant' because the terrified Claimant stupidly should not have pleaded guilty to trivial motoring offence thereby giving the bullying police immunity Immunity against any of their conduct throuout the incident...scarry or not scarry??

Roadside Video [5th back on this website video gallery] catches Cardiff police 'beating up' the Claimant after being dragged out of his car. This was before he was even arrested for ‘failure to give road side breath test' having just been followed directly from the Cardiff Crown Court where he and his secretary had been all morning complaining to the then, Recorder of Cardiff, Mr Justice Roderick Evans, about nine years of excessive South Wales Police bullying and proving police documents had been forged (see next incident).

3. Alleged Breach of the Peace at Vale Glamorgan Show

Another, 'Struck out' due to collateral attack on a conviction that, this time, never happened !!! The Claimant was never even charged (four versions of withheld BOP as Cla imant'sexhibits), jailed but never convicted. Bridgend Clerk of the Court, many months later, persuaded police, over lunch, to withdraw the alleged BOP offence, part way through a trial of other charges, quite unrelated, another time, another place, because the Claimant would obviously plead 'not guilty' and would have to go to prison due to common law!

Liar. Just as at the first hearing, in Barry, the Claimant was not told of what the female prosecutor or clerk had before them, witnessed by Claimant's secretary. It was BOP in three different forms!!!!!

The Claimant 'made it worth someone's while' to extract from Bridgend Magistrates records the original clerk's notes (exhibit) confirming scandalous conduct

4. 'Struck Out' due to 'collateral attack' in Claimant's absence from court due to in hospital after motor bike accident!

Veterinary nurse, planted in back of court, signed a sworn affidavit after hearing police stating:

"He drives around in his little white sports car quoting human rights...we are going to get the b'stard".

A trivial motoring conviction should not be the excuse for a High Court judge to protect the bullies breaking UK law.

5 The Defence's Hunter Case Law argument was quite inappropriate for such an unusual, extreme and excessive bullying case with more than one hundred incidents in the six or seven Particulars of Claim. Just how many incidents of police bullying does it take to remove their devine right not to investigate but allowed to cause physical injury, time and time again?

6. Defendant's ‘Mindset' not relevant?!!!!!! Has this High Court judge ever been confronted with such extreme acts of criminal conduct by police?. Of course not but the 'Maurices' of this world who dare question 'authority' are expendable SEE the injury list IN 'VICTIMS UNITE' blogs..

See 26^th May 2011 Machine Gun Particulars of Claim [ below] including False Psychiatric records all fabricated to obtain a false imprisonment designed to interfere with these very civil proceedings. Of course Mr Kitchin avoided the issue, that was his brief.

7. South Wales Police's, ‘Operation Orchid', at the same time, putting the fear of God into my wife when they threatened to have Social Services snatch our 10 year old daughter away has caused quite unforseen repercussions.

Etc, etc.

Mr Kitchin clearly does not realise anarchy is only just around the corner, in Wales and possibly, elsewhere, headed by those who know just where and when to strike, if the break down of law and order in our appalling law courts, driven by avarice, is not sorted out RIGHT NOW.

MACHINE GUN CASE

Once again it is the K Team that has to draft the court papers as no lawyer has been found after a 15 months trawl through solicitors's offices. It is of no surprise to me when you consider Dr Tegwyn Williams was given 'carte blanche' to falsify medical reports for 10, no less, Cardiff judges all knowing, full well, they were untrue but refusing bail due some higher sinister authority. Only one Welsh newspaper, The Glamorgan Gem, published a few of the appalling facts of dishonesty thoughout the Welsh judiciary in this case. If had not been for this web site, publishing day by day accounts of the trial, I would still be in jail due to that HM Partnership lot headed by Nicholarse Cooke QC, The Recorder of Cardiff.

There only remains outstanding which quick act of retribution is appropriate for the likes of Dr Tegwyn Williams as he, unlike Barbara Wilding, is not afforded the luxury of an armed guard. A Welsh court process? What a joke! That is pretty pointless considering our watching the Welsh NHS leave him loose to do it all over again on some unsuspecting individual with less luck.

Common Purpose and Law Society intend to wipe out jury trails and lay magistrates the very two facets of my machine gun case that shone through as the back bone of what we should be proud of. When the two systems are finally snuffed out by HMCS last one switch off the lights, please.

Court of Appeal Judgment by the Honourable Mr Justice Kitchin

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

Reasons:

An appeal has no real prospect of
success.

ln a long and careful judgment of 30
November 2010 the judge addressed the application by the defendant to strike
out the claimant's claims in respect of a number of incidents

ln particular

ln action CF04141, the judge struck
out an allegation in respect of the theft of cheques in that, as a matter of
law, the defendant did not owe the claimant a privately actionable duty of
care.

In actions BS614159-MC65, CF101741 and
CF204141, the judge struck out a series of allegations as being an abuse of
process in that they amounted to collateral attacks on criminal convictions of
the defendant or on conclusive findings which have been made against him in
other proceedings.

The claimant now seeks permission to
appeal on a number of grounds. There is nothing in any of them.

First the claimant contends that
the proceedings took place without him being able to take part. This was
plainly not the case. The judge explained in detail in paragraphs 3 and 4 of
his judgment the careful steps he took to ensure that the claimant was not in
any way disadvantaged and referred in paragraphs 3 to 6 to the extensive
submissions from the claimant which he considered.

Second, the claimant says he was
subjected to unfair pressure from the court and was unfairly disadvantaged. To
the contrary, it is apparent from the paragraphs of the judgment to which I
have referred that the judge took all reasonable steps to ensure the claimant
was not subjected to unfair pressure, nor disadvantaged.

Third, the claimant submits the
court wrongly excluded evidence. I reject this contention. There was no
material dispute of fact in relation to any of the allegations the judge struck
out.

Fourth, it is said the judge
failed to address key submissions. I do not accept this is so. The judge set
out the claimant's case on each issue very clearly. Indeed the judge accepted a
number of the claimant's submissions in refusing to strike out aspects of his
case.

Fifth, the claimant contends the
judge erred in law. In my judgment the defendant has not identified any proper
ground in support of this allegation. The judge correctly identified the
principle established in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and
his application of that principle to the facts alleged by the claimant cannot
be faulted. The other claims were struck out upon the application of the well
established principle that it is not permissible for a claimant to bring a
claim which amounts to collateral attack on an earlier criminal conviction or a
conclusive finding made against him in earlier proceedings.

Finally, the claimant asserts that
the judge failed to protect the claimant against the defendant's mindset. This
provides no basis for an appeal against the specific findings of the judge.

For all these reasons the judge was
also right to refuse permission to appeal.

Reasons

This is a case management order. The
judge declined to order all the cases to be consolidated. This was a perfectly
reasonable decision, particularly since the cases are already being heard
together.

There is no need for the cases to be
transferred to the High Court. Nor has any justification been shown for having
them transferred out of Wa1es.

An appeal has no real prospect of success.

17^th May 2011

Reply to Refusal

Dear Ms Pahl,

Please Forward, in your usual reliable way

31st May 2011

Kirk v South Wales Police

Appeal at Court of Appeal No.s CF029/2011a & CF030/2011a
( May 2011 court letter contains variations in case numbers)

FAO Clerk of the Court,

Further to the predicted refusal notice, based on politics and not facts, received on Saturday, 28th May, I apply for an oral hearing and be permitted witnesses to the facts, before the court, to attend without fear of intimidation.

I also apply that it take place not before but on the 15th June or onwards, in London, but not 28th June as it clashes with another court and an equally scandalous bit of Welsh bloody nonsense.

I also have medical appointments in both France and Londoin to entwine with dates already fixed.

If the hearing is in South Wales I run a very real risk of being falsly arrested again and finish up in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, as was attempted last time, following deliberate falsification of both Welsh HM CPS information and Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric reports.

Last time, following the Welsh filth and their usual tactics, being completely ignored or actively supported by 10 Welsh judges, Welsh HM Court Service and Welsh National Health Service, my liberty, without an appeal, now comes secondary in priority, following revenge, the latter, set for the rest of my short life, to be sufficient to educate the whole world, by exposing your evil Welsh judiciary, driven by greed.

Oh, if only I had listend to both my mother and father about the truth of South Wales, following their shock, in 1992, that I had bought a veterinary practice near Cardiff.

Yours,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Puits aux Papillons

St Doha

22230 Merdrignac

France

0033624571548

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

IN THE CARDIFF COURT

Maurice Kirk Claimant

Chief Constable of South Wales Police Defendant

Particulars of Claim

1. The Defendant was at all material times the chief officer of the South Wales Constabulary and the police officers hereinafter referred to were at all material times acting under the direction and control of the Defendant in the performance or purported performance of their functiion

2. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft by the Claimant's old friend, Mr Viv Bellamy

3. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 replica aeroplane and ‘gun' from a prosecution witness with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' s an integral part of the fuselage and therefore exempt under the 1968 Fire rms Act.

4. 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This became the critical argument in the trial but blocked throughout the twelve days of roceedings of utter nonsense.

5. 2000: The DH2 with the same Lewis antique was flown by the Claimant at the Farnborough Air Show by invitation of another old friend of the Claimant, Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame.

6. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' mounted.

7. 2007: he DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out, by the Royal Air Force, to a civilian for further repair in Hampshire also aware it was decommissioned.

8. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and ‘gun' to another display pilot, a prosecution witness, who ‘modified' the gun for his own purposes.

9. On or about 25^th February 2009 the Defendant signed a sworn affidavit knowing it to be or ought to have known it to be, false, in that paragraphs, between14 to 21, contained erroneous information, namely, incidents, involving both the Defendant and Claimant had ppeared to never have occurred. Police court cases had occurred and the Defendant's attendance, in force, with the use of a crow bar and sledge hammer, to enter the Claimant's Cardiff veterinary surgery, had also occurred. This amounts at least to misfeasance in public office.

10. Following the 2008 Court Order by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, for the Defendant to sign an affidavit that full disclosure of evidence, under the Defendant's control, had been disclosed to the Claimant, the latter entered the Defendants solicitor's' offices, on or about the 25^th February 2009 complaining the Court Order had still not been carried out.

11. The Claimant, upon receipt of a copy of the Defendant's affidavit then entered Barry Police Station and was both videoed and interviewed at length following his complaint that the Chief Constable had knowingly signed a false affidavit to avoid disclosure of evidence relevant to the nineteen year running covert police surveillance and civil actions for damages, referred to in CF101741 + four others.

12. The sale and subsequent management change of the Claimant's South Wales veterinary practice, in May 2009, allowed the Claimant to reveal, at last, on U Tube and websites worldwide the conduct of the South Wales Police with their covert surveillance team that had operated for well over ten years. The Claimant's 64 page June 09 witness statement, summarising their unusual and extreme behavior, was now being prepared for court.

13. On 1^st June 2009 the Defendant caused the Claimant to be subjected to a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) enquiry following a meeting, at the South Wales Police Head Quarters, Bridgend, by the Independent Advisory Group (IAG).

14. On 8^th June 2009, at Barry police station MAPPA meeting, police informed the agencies, present, including staff from Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison, that the Claimant was a category level 3, very dangerous and was to be arrested and ‘taken into custody' for being in possession of a prohibited weapon, a machine gun.

15. The police also informed the agencies that should the Claimant approach the Chief Constable then he was likely to be shot which has caused the Claimant to seek asylum in France for fear of his life

16. On 15^th June 2009 the Claimant brought further civil proceedings, in the Administrative Court, London, against the Defendant and Co-Defendant, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons relating to covert police surveillance. Covert plain clothed police officers were already in attendance.

17. On 18^th June 2009 the Claimant again laid the complaint, this time inside the offices of the Defendant's Bridgend South Wales Police head quarters where again there was refusal, by the Defendant, to ‘mutually exchange
witness statements' ordered by HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC

18. On 19^th June 2009 the Defendant again refused to exchange witness statements when the Defendant's solicitors, Dolmans, were contacted by the Claimant despite the Court Order having given the Defendant until 4pm.that day

19. On 20^thJune 2009 the Defendant's solicitors laid complaint with their client, against the Claimant, to be arrested for a ‘threat of criminal damage' which amounts to more bullying and harassment.

20. On 21^st June 2009 police Operations, ‘Orchid' and ‘Chalice, caused' a sizeable force of police officers to surround the Claimant's home, in St Donats, Vale of Glamorgan, requiring an armed response unit, a police helicopter and both forensic psychiatrists and a lay advisor for the Claimant to be in attendance. The operation was aborted once the Claimant was seen drinking tea with his family in their front garden.

21. On 22^nd June 2009 24/7 police surveillance caused the Claimant to be arrested in the road outside his property and cautioning him from a written script, following legal advise, that he had been arrested for:

a. Threat of committing criminal damage

b. Being in possession of a prohibited weapon

c. Being in possession of prohibited ammunition

22. ‘Operation Orchid' caused a second team of South Wales Police to interview the Claimant's wife at the family home, with the hope they could obtain a statement from her that the Claimant had a history of mental illness. This was in the hope of avoiding the criminal proceedings being put to strict proof. The Claimant's wife was threatened that her and Claimant's ten years old daughter was at serious risk of being taken into care, by the South Wales social services, if she did not cooperate. Blatant intimidation and harassment of the Claimant and his family.

23. The Claimant was never charged with the first arrest allegation, (a), and despite repeated court orders to reveal the evidence and statements by Dolmans, solicitors, they assisted their client by being a party to the February 2009 Chief Constable's sworn affidavit.

24. Despite repeated applications in Cardiff Crown Court, by the Claimant, for specific disclosure relating to the alleged ‘threat of criminal damage' to countless judges, HM Crown Prosecution Service, South Wales Police and Dolmans, the Defendant's solicitors, being the complainant, all refused.

25. Final proof of conspiracy needed just one last refused application, this time before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, the management judge in the ongoing civil proceedings between the Claimant and Defendant.

26. Dolmans had little choice but to again refuse to disclose the evidence of their client's criminal conduct and/or gross mismanagement during the days leading up to the Claimant's 22^nd June 2009 ridiculous arrest

27. Dolmans falsified evidence assisting in the arrest of the Claimant, their client, the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Ms Barbara Wilding, the latter assuring them, no doubt, of their immunity to prosecution. The overall plan was to prejudice the Claimant's position in the ongoing civil proceedings now that the ‘cover up' of an expensive ten year police covert surveillance team, on the Claimant, was starting to fall apart.

28. There was no intention of arresting the Claimant on fire arms charges. The Claimant, without full MAPPA approval or understanding, had been set up to be ‘lawfully killed' by an armed South Wales Police unit under direct orders from senior police officers.

29. Events following the early 2009 decision by these high ranking police officers, to have the Claimant eliminated, eventually became unmanageable due to the unpredictable conduct of their moving target and the effect of his postings on his website.

30. Between 22^nd and 23^rd June 2009 the police filmed and removed, from his home, the Claimant's lawfully held shot guns, ammunition and court files, the latter relating to the Claimant's ongoing complaint of police bullying, harassment, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments conducted in most un usual and extreme
manner suggesting vengeance at the tax payer's expense

31. None of the above items, guns, ammunition or court files have ever been returned to the Claimant with the police continuing to block the Claimant's right to re new his gun licences.

32. On 24^th June 2009 a police officer or officers laid information against the Claimant at Barry Magistrates court alleging that that the Claimant had been ‘in possession of a prohibited weapon', one antique 1916 Lewis machine gun and had sold the ‘gun', a year earlier, both contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act

33. The English police refused to ‘touch the subject with a barge pole' once they became aware that the South Wales Police had persuaded the Civil Aviation Authority to telephone ahead to the new owner, in England, to dismount the Lewis antique and alone drive it across Lincolnshire and beyond to find any licenced arms dealer where it could be, later, collected by the Defendant.

34. The Welsh police then ‘hawked' the Lewis antique nearly two thousand miles around the UK, contrary to strict Home Office Regulations, during which time the Defendant had it ‘modified' at their special police laboratory in South Wales. This Claim is yet another one of misfeasance in public office.

35. Upon reading the Claimant's June 2009 64 page Defence statement, on the Defendant's real motives behind his arrest, the Barry Magistrates court, together with legal advice, allowed the Claimant immediate and unconditional bail.

36. On 25^th June 2009 the police appealed the Court Order deliberately lying on the relevant facts, under consideration, to HHJ Hughes causing the Claimant to be further detained in custody in Cardiff prison.

37. Repeat of these lies by the Defendant occurred before a further nine more Cardiff Crown Court judges when opposing bail. False antecedent history together with this malicious false imprisonment is one of the major Claims of the Claimant.

38. The Defendant, over nearly eight months, deliberately refused the Claimant standard or specific disclosure of evidence, under their control, that would have cleared the Claimant's name before the need of a trial. Defamation is another serious Claim by the Claimant.

39. In July 2009 the Defendant brought a third indictment namely, obtaining income from the ‘proceeds of crime'. A judge, much later, caused this third indictment to be withdrawn. This event contributes to the large number of proceedings that the Claimant has won against the Defendant.

40. On 3^rd August 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams, forensic psychiatrist and Director of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police forensic Unit, at Bridgend, signed a psychiatric report recommending the Claimant be sectioned and further remanded in custody to his medium secure psychiatric unit, Caswell Clinic, under Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act having not even examined his patient

41. Dr Teqwyn Williams had in his possession, before 3^rd August 2009, psychiatric reports from both HM Prison Cardiff and his own Caswell Clinic doctors, that the Claimant did not need any medication or treatment relevant to the 1983 Mental Health Act.

42. On 28^thAugust 2009 a series of brain scans, arranged by Dr Tegwyn Williams, indicated no relevant abnormalities in the Claimant, confirmed at the time, in writing, by at least one expert at the Princess Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgend.

43. In September 2009, after it was clear the Claimant was not going to employ a lawyer, with sworn allegiance to the South Wales courts, Dr Tegwyn Williams recommended that the Claimant be now transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison (IPP), Imprisonment for Public Protection with a term of imprisonment, without trail, of an inordinate length stating, without appropriate qualifications, the Claimant had ‘significant brain damage' and ‘possible cancer', neither of which had much chance of recovery.

44. Whilst this Claim could be conceived against Dr Tegwyn Williams alone, it is concluded here as a major act of harassment by the Defendant who had commissioned Dr Williams via FTAC and MAPPA.

45. The Claimant, following much needed legal advice retains the right of including Dr Tegwyn Williams as a Co-Defendant in these civil proceedings for damages.

46. On or about the 24^th October 2009 the Claimant was further remanded in custody in Cardiff Prison reliant on a further Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric report the Defendant knew or ought to have known was false as the National Health Service doctor was not even qualified to sign such a court document as true, to the best of his belief.

47. On the 2nd December 2009 the prosecution had convened a hearing, not tape recorded and in the absence of the Claimant, left locked up under the court, to discuss, at length, with the proposed trial judge and Dr Tegwyn Williams, the possibilities of avoiding the trial by way of a Section 41 or similar, of the 1983 Mental Health Act, that could have the Claimant locked away, without trial, for life.

48. But the Defendant had failed to obtain the second signatory from any appropriately qualified forensic psychiatrist, required by law, in either England or Wales, but not for the want of trying.

49. On the 2^nd December 2009 The Defendant failed to inform the proposed trial judge, HHJ Bidder QC, that the Claimant had caused not less than twelve psychiatric reports from a same number of psychiatrists that the Claimant was not requiring the need for either psychiatric assessment or treatment.

50. HM Court Service (Wales), as is their habit, failed to disclose to HHJ Bidder QC or the Claimant of the Claimant's privately obtained expert medical report, from outside Wales, having been served on Cardiff Crown Court the day before by an English solicitor and past MP for the Vale of Glamorgan.

51. The report seriously contradicted both those of Dr Tegwyn Williams' and the findings of Professor Roger Wood, the latter also unqualified to state an opinion that might affect permanent custody of the Claimant

52. On 7^tt December 2009 the Claimant, using other lawyers, again from well outside South Wales, caused the MAPPA coordinator, based at the Defendant's HQ, to indicate, in writing, ‘ The right arm did not know what the left arm of the law was doing'

53. On 17^th December 2009 the Defendant headed a hurriedly convened MAPPA meeting in the Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, due to yet another Claimant bail Application before HHJ Bidder QC scheduled that day in Newport Crown Court.

54. The Claimant's name for some reason, currently subject to HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC's outstanding Order for disclosure, was removed from the MAPPA register without any explanation to the Claimant causing further hardship and distress to the Claimant, in prison, still trying to establish his exact MAPPA status and why, just a before trial carrying a possible mandatory ten year prison sentence.

55. The Claimant has to this day never established why and later, why not, he was on the MAPPA register with the Defendant repeatedly refusing to disclose, contrary to law.

56. Defense evidence or ‘summing up' was never needed due the prosecution's fairy tale, a view held by at least nine members of the jury, stating to the Claimant, immediately after the trial, that their decision was already concluded by eleven of the jury after the first day of evidence and cross examination

57. On 9^th February 2010, at Cardiff Crown Court, the Claimant was found ‘not guilty' on the two remaining indictments and was released from custody with no conditions.

58. The jury also made the Claimant aware, immediately after the hearing, that they questioned why both the original seller to the Claimant, of the Lewis antique and the current owner, buying from the Claimant, were not also in the dock or behind bars.

59. The Claimant's complaints to the relevant police authorities, to investigate the conduct within South Wales Police, before and after his arrest and nearly eight months in custody, have been swept under the proverbial carpet in a perfunctory manner to which the Claimant is accustomed since first settling in South Wales.

60. The arrest and detention and prosecution of the Claimant were unlawful as the most appalling act of malice.

61. There were no reasonable grounds to believe that the Claimant was probably guilty of the offence for which he was arrested.

62. The decisions to arrest and detain the Claimant were such as no reasonable police officer would have reached.

63. The Claimant was detained for longer than was reasonably necessary and in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

64. Further, the actions of police officers set out above constitute harassment within meaning of section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and misfeasance in public office.

65. By reason of the matters aforesaid, the Claimant has suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety, damage to his reputation and was deprived of his liberty. He has been subjected to bullying, malicious prosecution and harassment, false imprisonment and contrary to the 1998 Human Rights Act.

Withheld NHS Medical Records

66. On or about 10^th February 2010 the Defendant arrested and detained in custody the Claimant for entering Caswell Clinic, when invited by the staff to collect his full medical records, promised by Dr Tegwyn Williams following the Claimant's applications under the Freedom of Information and Data Protection Acts. Also promises to his GP's secretary, in the presence of the Claimant, by the manager, stated they could be collected from the Caswell Clinic porter's lodge. His multi agency collusion has caused serious aggravation to the Claimant's health

67. The full medical records were not disclosed and currently remain with the South Wales National Health Service, also now refusing to hand them over.

68. The Claimant was charged with numerous allegations and jailed. Severe bail conditions were set before all charges were later dropped with the Defendant refusing to properly investigate the Claimant's complaint into the apparent falsified medical records written by both Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic and Professor Roger Wood of Swansea University

69. The Defendant's actions were both malicious and bullying and/or yet a further example of misfeasance in public office the Claimant has suffered under, by the Defendant, since 1992

HM Court Service (Wales).

70. In July 2010 ex South Wales Police officer, a Derrick Hassan, violently assaulted the Claimant, dependant at the time on a pair of crutches and on daily morphine sulphate and other analgesic medication. Hassan pushed the Claimant part way down a flight of stairs in Cardiff Crown Court causing the Claimant to attend casualty and treatment for a damaged ankle and increased his hip pain in a much overdue total hip replacement required, caused by the failure ofthe Defendant to investigate the Claimant's complaint, relating to falsified medical evidence. The Vale Hospital, Vale of Glamorgan, had to take this into consideration, without clarification being available, to cancel elected surgery.

71. Despite being given the name and address of an independent witness, not part of HM Court Service (Wales), the Defendant refused to have him interviewed thereby acting irresponsibly and with without due care. The conduct was malicious.

Racially Aggravated Public Order allegations

72. 69 On or about the 2^nd August 2010 the Claimant was arrested and jailed by the Defendant purely for monetary gain by a third party. The Crown Prosecution Service offered ‘no evidence' and the Claimant was found ‘not guilty' in his absence of all parties

73. Again, the Defendant refused to investigate thousands of pounds of damage caused, caught in the act by the Claimant, by these same complainants of the dismissed Public Order offences.

74. This malicious prosecution is a further act of both misfeasance in public office and harassment

Stolen Cheques incident currently under appeal at The Court of Appeal

75. On or around November 2010 the Claimant identified the thief of his stolen surgery cheques, some nine years earlier, the subject currently on appeal from Action CF101+ three others, before the Court of Appeal (Wales). The thief was giving his identity details to a named clerk in Barry Post Office. The Defendant, due to ill health and on crutches was unable to apprehend the thief.

76. Previously, the Defendant in the defenses of the earlier Action admitted to the Claimant that the Defendant had not been able to trace the thief despite being, known to the Defendant, given film footage of his cashing falsified Claimant's cheques and given his home address in Barry.

77. The Claimant informed the Defendant of the above new information but the Defendant refused to properly investigate or even speak to the clerk at the Barry Post Office or the Claimant on the new evidence.

78. In summary, the Claimant has suffered from the malicious intent of the Defendant's misfeasance in public office as well as the unprofessional behaviour of the Defendant's solicitors and of the Defendant's forensic psychiatrist. The Defendant's bullying and harassment resulted in false imprisonment, severe damage to reputation, completely unnecessary legal proceedings and thus a claim to damages, exemplary damages, special a criminal investigation and costs.

79. Unless restrained by the Court, police officers will continue to harass the Claimant.

80. The Claimant retains his right for trial by jury and for a lawyer to read and amend this Claim

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Puits aux Papillons
St Doha
22 230 Merdrignac
Bretagne
France

26^th May 2011

Copy to Cardiff Court of Appeal
             Cardiff County Court
             His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC
             The French Immigration Authorities

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Protected by Royal Charter so Sale of Maurice's 5 Bedroomed House not even covers RCVS Legal Costs

Maurice — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:25:00 GMT

Investigation into Royal Charters

EXPLICIT ORDER

These orders specifically require ministers and judges* to treat the chartered body ‘in the most favourable and beneficial sense' for its ‘best advantage.' This is to be done despite wrongdoing, specifically including ‘non-recital' (concealment) and ‘mis-recital' (deception).

The 1967 Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Act omits ‘mis -recital'

A Number of European Court of Human Rights Applications are currently being prepared in Brittany now that Maurice is struggling but ‘out of the woods, medically and well off the daily morphine!

‘A Royal Charter' is the common thread between the South Wales Police, in 2001, making complaint to have Maurice struck off the veterinary register, for life, just for questioning ‘authority' through the courts and a recent Criminal Court of Appeal Judgment, Regina v Maurice Kirk , for ‘Contempt of Court', currently applied for to go to the Supreme Court as the hearing appears contrary to Article 6.

Dr Tegwyn Williams, in August 2009, was employed by Wales HM Partnership to fabricate false medical evidence, for which he had no qualifications, to have Maurice incarcerated, without trial, in a high security hospital, possibly for life. His medical reports stated Maurice having, ‘significant brain damage and possible tumour'.

Each Royal Charter affecting the ten judges, including the Recorder of Cardiff, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, who three times, alone, refused bail on this medical evidence, that Maurice was too dangerous to be released, can be read on transcripts on this website Downloads.

The Court of Appeal Judgment is likely to refuse permission for the case to go to the Supreme Court due to the fact the ‘argument' with HHJ Cooke QC , in Cardiff Crown Court, a year earlier, had before him the now proved falsified medical evidence, proved by other medical reports, then withheld from His Honour, including a clear brain scan of August 2009 organised by Williams, no less, as Director of the Caswell Clinic prison, Bridgend!........

.......this document will expand on a weekly basis until all Royal Charters , affecting Maurice's life, have been appropriately exposed to the general public as a warning of what is yet to come.

copy of HCHR applications shortly and any help in preparation always appreciated.

Happy Easter

28th June 2011 Criminal Court of Appeal for Appeal re Contempt of Court imprisonment re Dr Tegwyn Williams

SabineKMcNeill — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:32:00 GMT

Mr Justice Moses, Mr Justice Madison and Recorder of Leeds, presiding, to allow or not, eye witnesses and the release from Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, Maurice's medical records of possible brain tumour? £50 for anyone attending and supplying written record of what they both saw and heard.

Criminal Court of Appeal

London

12^th April 2011

Regina v Maurice John Kirk Case number: 201004016C1

Dear Sir,

I wish permission to appeal to the Supreme Court of England and Wales

Some of the Grounds;

Contrary to Article 47 and 1998 Human Rights Act

1. Hearing took place in Appellant's absence despite medical evidence that he could not attend following major surgery in Brittany, France.
2. Lawyer instructed was unable to attend due to ill health.
3. The Cardiff judge had already risen from his seat thereby no court was in session at the time of alleged offence of Contempt of Court.
4. The limited facts before the Court of Appeal, due to failed prosecution disclosure, made it unsafe to dismiss the Appeal.
5. Both Cardiff Court and Criminal Court of Appeal refused eye witnesses, including the police officer in attendance ‘to keep an eye on the Applicant', the latter simply there asking for clarification relating to his suspected brain tumour and diagnosed ‘significant brain damage' causing a ‘paranoid delusional disorder', as set out in 2^nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court records (refused to be disclosed) and numerous psychiatric reports by Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic prison, Bridgend.
6. Neither court have considered and/or taken steps to have the Applicant/prisoner/Appellant examined as to the relevance of the ‘mental disorder ‘affecting his conduct on 24^th June 2011.
7. Both Cardiff Crown Courts and The Court of Appeal refused to order clarification of Dr Tegwyn Williams's findings, the latter pleading before 2^nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, in the absence of the prisoner, were sufficiently so serious that he recommended the prisoner be Sectioned, 41, under the 1983 Mental Health Act, to Ashworth high security psychiatric prison.
NO FILE was thrown at the presiding judge.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc (Applicant)

Losing today's Criminal Court of Appeal that carried on without Maurice being able to call the eye witnesses, refused in the lower court or have released the original court record of the incident, three High Court judges ignoring the serious content in his five page submission(below), ignoring the doctor's certificate that Maurice cannot travel to England to fight the case, due to his recent hip operation and most importantly, now, three more judges are backing at least ten previous Cardiff judges that have all refused to make Dr Tegwyn Williams clarify his scandalous 2009 medical reports, purely to have Maurice sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act as he may have a 'brain tumour' but definitely has permanent ,‘significant brain damage', too dangerous to allow release from prison, just about sums up the current state of our UK law courts.

Dr Sheida Oraki , as Maurice's Mackenzie Friend, fought her corner with panache, asking for the usual basic relevant disclosure of evidence, withheld due to the gross embarrassment it would cause the Taffia, left the court clearly of the opinion the UK Criminal courts appear to be in as much a mess as her civil court experiences have revealed.

Just a simple updated Dr Tegwyn Williams medical report, on my 'brain damage', could avoid, currently, three, possibly four, of the on going criminal and civil court proceedings, two shortly for Europe, financed by the tax payer, YOU

France cancels Maurice's five months of asylum protection from South Wales Police

Only a cynic would suggest this is a coincidence

Extract 30/03/11 OPFRA, Paris letter::

"Par ailleurs, La Grande- Bretaqne, Etat membre de l'Union europenne, peut etre regarde conme respectant Ies libertes fondamentales ; ce pays dispose notamment d'un systeme judicialre de nature a garantir a ses ressortissants le droit a un recours effectif en cas d' atteinte a ces libertes. Des lors, sa demande apparait manifestement infonde"

République française,

Ministry of the Interior,

OFPRA

dossier : 2010-12-03992-EU-NHI

The application for asylum by Mr Maurice John KIRK

is rejected for the following reasons:

The applicant, a British subject and former veterinary surgeon, alleges malicious

obstruction by local administrators of the British judiciary system thus, among

other things, preventing him from being reinstated in the Register of the Royal

College of Veterinary Surgeons. He claims to have been threatened with death

at the time of an arrest in 2009 and to have been the victim of illegal psychiatric

imprisonment. A warrant for his arrest was [apparently] issued on 2nd November

2010 for an alleged assault. These disputes have caused delay in the

therapeutic treatment of various other medical problems, in particular

orthopaedic.

However, the applicant has provided no element, in his detailed but, nonetheless

confused, declarations that could seriously establish that he be the object of

persecution or threats without any protection being available in his country of

origin.

Moreover, Great-Britain, a member state of the European Union, can be

regarded as respecting the fundamental liberties ; it is a country that has a

judiciary system intended to guarantee its citizens the right to effective recourse

in cases of infringement of these liberties. Hence, his application appears to be

manifestly unfounded.

Fontenay-sous-Bois, 30th March 2011

Mourad DERBAK

chef de la Division Europe

OFPRA

French Authorities refer to Union Law protecting citizens in any Member State to obtain protection from his or her 'domestic court', tomorrow.

What a joke! Maurice intends to appeal the decision.

It is June 2010. Maurice is in court after seven months unlawful imprisonment, three of which in Dr Tegwyn Williams' psychiatric clinic, the dreaded Caswell Clinic, Bridgend. Williams falsified medical evidence to try and obtain Maurice's permanent imprisonment, without trial, for the South Wales Police defending a 19 year running civil damages claim for bullying, malicious prosecutions, false imprisonments and perverting the course of justice.

He gets so frustrated by the judge not being willing to look at the evidence that he puts a folder on the clerk's desk in a way that is considered, by some, to be in "contempt of court".

Well, in his well-trained ability to appeal, ten months later, he is expected to be in the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Tuesday, April 12th. Time and room can be confirmed from 020 7947 7717. But so far, it's scheduled for 10.30 in Room 5.

Here is his submission.

Here is the Court's letter: you must attend or else your appeal will be dismissed. [His French doctors forbid him to travel for 2 months after his hip was replaced on March 25th.]

And here is the Court's update

The K-Team Brings Home the Bacon (hopefully)! Questions Asked in House of Lords

Maurice — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:34:00 GMT

The picture was taken when the 4 bundles were ready to go to the Court of Appeal in London, a day after the rugby win of England over France - hence the St. George's flag but on 6th March Maurice receives a High Court letter saying the Appeal must be heard before a 'single judge', in Cardiff of all places! Just how much more incestuous can this case get?

The bundles contain, above all,

Questions asked in House of Lords...see latest DOWNLOAD

the Draft Order
the 40-page Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Permission to Appeal from a common sense perspective
Permission to Appeal by a legally trained mind
the refusal to appeal by HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC
the Grounds for Appeal - besides oodles of documents illustrating:

the bullying and harassment madness of 39 motoring incidents, between 1993 and 2002, that were used to get Maurice struck off the Register of Veterinary Surgeons (2002)
evidence of delaying this civil court action (lodged in 1996) to progress, by stepping up the level of bullying and harassment through MAPPA (Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements), firearms response, 7 months imprisonment, including 3 months incarcerationin a psychiatric clinic, claiming serious brain damage, possibly brain tumour
evidence of the torturous mis-management of medical records by the NHS and its organisations, preventing Maurice from having his painful hip replaced (first scheduled for June 2010!).

After a month of 24/7 frantic court preparation, house bound in a forest in Brittany, in much pain and up to his knees in screwed up A4 paper, empty wine bottles and half eaten plates of food, battling against the ‘invincible prejudice' of our UK judiciary, Maurice finally crawls on to his settee and falls asleep.

With no phone line or internet for weeks and hobbling so badly now, just to get to his front door, today manages to get to the village's oh so erratic access to cyberspace and e-mail. The Skeleton Argument for the Royal Courts of Justice, on a deadline, goes at last, only for it to bounce straight back, meaning it has to go via Berlin!

HM Court Service gremlins, once again, are interfering in the ‘due process' of law, the guys now, with a little help from the South Wales Police, now seeming to have taken over the purpose of the ‘lay magistrate', lay jury and statute law, our last bastions of impartiality, setting aside the moment, the Freemasonry argument and even the occasional judge, now, is spotted quietly edging, by inconceivable steps, towards ‘political discretion', for judgment, rather than using the truth and the ‘Rule of Law'.

Today, the K-Team finished the Skeleton Argument, some 37 pages, for the Court of Appeal in London, a legal view of a potted history of an Englishman's experience of his 20 years of purgatory, trying to go about his business in South Wales, as a veterinary surgeon, where ‘Law and Order' is now clearly a joke and where ‘Big Brother' is being groomed as a testing ground. So what does he have in store for YOU?

Maurice knows full well, just how lucky he was, not getting locked away for life in a high security psychiatric prison. He often has sleepless nights reliving his sheer hell in Caswell Clinic. Falsified medical reports by Dr Tegwyn Williams & Professor Roger Wood nearly worked, as well as nearly being shot by South Wales Police, under the pretence of him being a MAPPA dangerous predator!

He will always remain indebted to friends and the ‘silent helpers' in cyberspace, that published world wide the evilness oozing out of Cardiff and Bridgend's Authorities that year.

Next time they will be a little less arrogant and plan a little better, control coming from Whitehall next time, which is why he is one step ahead, at the moment, on asylum in France.

The power of websites, to educate those few who wish to listen, must be made more effective now that websites and telephone interference is rampant, so, please, watch your back.

PS from the sister blog (over 1,700 hits since September 2010):

The K-Team is a miraculous network of support that has formed around Maurice and includes a superb legally trained mind.

One of the outcomes is this 37-page document with 268 paragraphs. It asks the Court of Appeal to consider a number of things:

1. to "consolidate" the four actions into one
2. to consider how the lower Court erred in law on a number of levels
3. to look at the whole case in terms of "bullying" which means including cumulative effects
4. to think about the implications for public services, Parliament and the electorate
5. to remember human rights
6. to consider a level playing field between Claimant and Defendent (a huge organisation)
7. to take into account that Maurice can't get a lawyer.

All in all, the best possible overview that takes all aspects of Maurice's life into account, except what preceded South Wales: Guernsey and Somerset.........

Are You a Man or a Mouse, Doctor? Cardiff Magistrates 22nd Feb 10am

Maurice — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:42:00 GMT

After a particularly bad night as each time I roll over, my hip wakes me up with the pain, I tried yet again for my Barry GP to obtain clarification from Dr Tegwyn Williams. But it is obvious the 'taffia' are at work, even in a GP's surgery.

Dear Doctor,

ARE YOU A MAN OR A MOUSE?

1. My hip operation has still not been done, meaning I am prescribed yet more morphine sulphate for analgesia and with 'bone on bone', putting at risk post-op complications.

2. Clarification for, first the Welsh anaesthetist last June and now, the French anaesthetist, in Brittany, remains EXACTLY THE SAME, both refusing in the elected surgery until you, as my GP, obtain clarification from the Welsh NHS, as to whether it is safe for me to have a general anaesthetic?

3. Cowbridge Health Centre banned me from their surgery once it was realised there was a HM/police conspiracy to get me locked away for life.

4. Is your apparent refusal to just update your 2nd December 2010 medical report, faxed to the Cardiff Magistrates, because you have also been nobbled?

5. Until the bloody Welsh NHS, Welsh HM Crown Prosecution Service, Welsh HM Court Service or Welsh HM Cardiff prison give clarification to police run Caswell Clinic's Dr Tegwyn Williams 2009 dubious medical reports, I run the real risk of not obtaining a 'set aside' for re-hearing, by the Cardiff same district judge, on 22nd February 2011.

6. The case was originally heard in my absence because, Jo confirmed, your medical report arrived at the Magistrates after the hearing had started. Please, at least send me a copy, by return for my solicitor, as I am too ill to conduct the case.

7. Dr Tegwyn Williams, wash your mouth out, Maurice, informed the Cardiff Crown Court and MAPPA meetings, I have 'significant and irreversable brain damage' with Crown prosecutor, Me Richard Thomlow, saying ,'possible brain tumour', asking for a Section 45, under the 1983 Mental Health Act, to send me to Broadmoor for life.

I have the phone by my bedside and computer to receive your response.

Yours sincerely,

At the 11th hour my GP has just rung me, in France and agreed to send me, within 24 hours, an updated medical certificate addressed to 21st Feb court hearing, similar to his original, in June 2009 to HHJ Cooke QC, when the Welsh aneasthetist had refused by a party for elected surgery without Dr Tegwyn Williams clarifying his 2nd December 2009 evidence to HHJ Bidder QC that I had significant brain damage and the CPS stated, a possible tumour.

The Dr has also kindly agreed to send the old December 2010 medical report, that arrived just too late at magistrates, on the 2nd December 2010, causing the case to to heard in my absence.

Is this a light at the end of the tunnel ? Will NHS managers now make Dr Tegwyn Williams come clean?

1) CARDIFF MAGISTRATES COURT (Tuesday, 22nd Feb 2011, 10am, Regina v Kirk)

17^th February 2011

Re: Mr Maurice Kirk

12/03/1945

I would like to state that I have not seen Mr Kirk since September 2010, as I believe he is currently living in France. He has led me to understand that he is still awaiting surgery and is therefore still using strong analgesia to control the pain, which is being supplied to him in France.

I would therefore be grateful if you would consider a further adjournment, as Mr Kirk is not able to defend himself whilst using such strong analgesia.

Yours faithfully

2) Medical Report from London Specialist

I am an Independent Occupational Health Physician, General Practitioner and Psychologist. I work as an independent Occupational Health Physician and Psychologist. I am a member of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Royal College of General Practitioners, Diplomate member of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine, full member of the Society of Occupational Medicine, and full member of the British Psychological Society, with Level A and B qualifications in psychometric assessment.

This report has been prepared following a telephone consultation with Maurice Kirk on the 16^th February 2011, for an Occupational Health Assessment, to establish his physical fitness with respect of preparing a legal court case and whether there has been any material change in his medical condition since my last report.

3) In preparing this report I have also had sight of a medical certificate from Maurice Kirk's French Physician Dr Dennis Leclerc, dated 14^th January 2011.

This report is a supplementary report to my reports of 06.09. 2010 and 22.11. 2010

4) Dr Tegwyn Williams' Latest Psychiatric Report

to be disclosed from successful applications currently befrore both London and Cardiff courts

watch this space

______________________________________________________________________

First Petition to Parliament on Behalf of Victims of White Collar Crime

Maurice — Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:22:00 GMT

The following Petition has been submitted to our new MP for the Vale of Glamorgan, Alun Cairns MP, following a very lively debate at our 25th January 2011 House of Commons meeting with both Members of the House of Lords and House of Commons in attendance, a committee room, I may say, STUFFED with Victims of the banks, HM and our law courts, solicitors and NHS (see photo gallery, other blogs and PDF downloads).

To the House of Commons

The petition of Maurice J Kirk BVSc, a citizen of the UK at 52, Tynewydd Road, Barry CF62 8AZ, declares that he has tried everything in his powers as a former veterinary surgeon to stand up to the harassment of South Wales Police who have delayed his civil action against them.

The citizen has suffered from harassment by South Wales Police that culminated in 7 months imprisonment, including 3 months in a psychiatric clinic, after getting him struck off the Register of Veterinary Surgeons.

One of the incidents in a series of interconnected legal actions was the machine gun case. The allegation was the possession and sale of a ‘gun' even though it was decommissioned and an ‘add on' to an historic aircraft. In the run up to the trial, however, South Wales Police mobilised Multi-Agency Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) hoping to shoot or section the citizen for life. MAPPA categorisation was used for imprisonment which included 3 months in a psychiatric clinic. A leaked MAPPA document, published on his website www.kirkflyingvet.com, shows that the Police had a firearms response.

The harassment included the falsification of medical records claiming that he has serious brain damage, possibly brain cancer, to get him sectioned. This prevented his surgical team from carrying out a hip replacement scheduled for June 2010.

While the citizen won the machine gun case in court, he did not get any costs or compensation for malicious prosecution, false imprisonments and generally the deprivation of his human and professional rights as a veterinary surgeon.

The petitioner therefore requests that the Government steps in as Compensator of Last Resort

Dear Mr Cairns,

The 25th January meeting at the House of Commons was a resounding success with many Members from both Houses, with 'like minds', all in one room! The ever widening divide between the basic rules of justice and the conduct of the South Wales Police, our law courts, Crown Prosecution Service and now, HM Court Service, is really most serious because it is clear there is no accountability for their joint actions.,.

South Wales National Health Service and our Health Minister refuse to hand over my medical records in their current control and with CPS, police, Caswell Clinic, HM Prison, Cardiff, Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood are all refusing to clarify, with my surgeons, my medical history when I was in prison custody meaning still further delay in my much needed hip operation.

When can I next see you, please, either in London or Barry? I have currently obtained asylum in France following the repeated attempts by the South Walers Police to either have me shot or jailed for life so any meeting must be before my witnesses and suitably recorded.

Yours sincerely, .

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Asking for Permission to Appeal - in the Public Interest

SabineKMcNeill — Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:55:00 GMT

HH Judge Seys Llewellyn QC sent this 40-page judgment on preliminary issues and this draft order with the invitation to respond with a "succinct statement of those aspects which he seeks to appeal and the reasons, if any, which he identifies for permission to appeal being granted."

So we submitted the following documents:

Permission to Appeal - 9 pages written by Sabine K McNeill as McKenzie Friend
Permission to Appeal (2)
Provisional Grounds for Appeal regarding MAPPA - paragraph 5 supported by MAPPA letters here to sink home to the reader just how close Maurice was to being locked away for life, without even a trial, by a Welsh Crown Court.

Admittedly, 31 pages can hardly be "succinct". But, first of all, the documents stem from different view points on what way our judicial system is becoming, i.e. they embrace very different view points and emotional backgrounds. Secondly, they argue very differently. Thirdly, the judgment seems more like a response to the Defendant's argument (the Police) rather than one that takes in the Claimant's (Maurice) arguments into account.

So Maurice has to respond as best as he can, but he can't any more. He needs help. Let's hope it works! The challenge is that a higher Court (the Court of Appeal in London) can make Law. And we do hope that this unusual, extreme and indefinite case will make history in Law - in the Public Interest!

Racially Aggravated Threat Trial Starts Today

Maurice — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:32:00 GMT

HM Crown Prosecution are still refusing to hand over my Dr Tegwyn Williams medical records, used on the 2nd December 09, to keep me locked up. Now they affect my trial today, in Barry magistrates, see here. All the HM courts are now blocking my e-mails and I have received a letter from HM Partnership stating I am not allowed to enter any civil or criminal court in South Wales at all, without prior written consent.

Well, past invitations to court have never, actually, been a great thrill, but just how else am I expected to do my target practice now? On a machine gun range?