Search results matching tag 'Glamorgan Gem'

Lord Leveson Mr Justices Mitting & Males REFUSE Maurice's Applic for NHS (Wales) Falsified MAPPA Psychiatric Reports to be CORRECTED OR CLARIFIED

Maurice — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:56:00 GMT

JUDGMENT

14th March 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal, whilst sitting in Cardiff, refused Maurice Kirk both legal representation and clarificationion as to whether he had 'significant brain damage’ and 'possible' cancer reported to 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, by a South Wales police psychiatrist, whilst recommending his victim be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Prison for the doctor’s own safety, from an interested third party, an elderly Norman Scarth Esq.

That makes 14 UK judges, now, protecting NHS (Wales) and South Wales Police policy and damned the danger to the general public, to allow servicer of the 'Gulag card' on anyone who dares threaten their

pensions

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2013-03-14a.147843.h&s=speaker%3A11420#g147843.q0

Maurice's very simple submission, today, stating, at the out set he only wanted his psychiatric reports corrected or clarified.

They had already had the refusal drafted months ago

Maurice asked for an ajournment for legal representation but was refused.

Maurice asked it be adjourned owing to a JR application was outstanding about the circus of District Judge John Charles circus on 1st December 2011....Maurice was refused

Their Lordships already had this document from me, knocked up at 6am on the day, served on them for Cyberr space world wide ECHR and CCRC

Please note today's court judgment is a stark warning to others in Wales of what has been going on re the practice of false psychiatric reports understood by no one, not even the writer.

This judgment means trouble

Criminal Court of Appeal ref: 201203241 D2

At Cardiff Crown Court ref: CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012

1CF 03546

Regina v Maurice John Kirk

Application to Appeal

SUMMARY

The trial was unsafe because:

The jury was denied the defence evidence

Extract taken from 4^th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court hearing at approx. 10.45am

JUDGE CURRAN: Do you intend give evidence?

MR KIRK: It depends on whether you let me get my legal papers that are down stairs.

JUDGE CURRAN: Mr Kirk, I am not going to let you get at what you call your legal papers.

(The Appellant was not allowed to be present or allowed to call any defence witnesses)

The jury was misdirected

Jury note(s) to the learned judge they received a response, in the forced absence of the Appellant, that there was ‘no evidence’ from both the custody manager and court clerk’s contemporaneous notes and CCTV footage stored from GEOamey Custody Services cameras positioned both in the Appellant’s cell and in the long custody suite corridor or from the HM court’s controlled cameras at both exit of the custody suite and building.

LEE BARKER, the custody suite manager said, both on oath and in his witness statement, that he ‘served’ the ‘restraining order’ in the cell after he had to first unlocked the cell door.

MICHAEL WILLIAMS said, both on oath and in his witness statement, that he saw served on the Appellant the ‘restraining order’ whilst the Appellant was on crutches in the corridor returning from the toilets. Potential weapons, such as crutches, are not allowed in that area.

CCTV cameras recorded the part hand written ‘restraining order’ remained in BARKER’S hand , whilst in the cell and recorded the Appellant literately being dragged out and thrown out of the suite by no less than five angry custody officers who then threw his crutches onto his head as he lay on the floor of the public corridor. The camera at the exit of the building recorded defence witnesses, called to give evidence, seeing the Appellant both in hand cuffs and in a wheel chair.

The jury was subjected to a ‘An Abuse of Process’

The psychiatrist subjected the Appellant to the NHS (Wales) zero tolerance policy thereby seriously prejudicing current civil litigation from 20 years of persistent police bullying by

a) Causing the Appellant to be registered, in Barry police station, on 8^th June 2009, a MAPPA level 3 victim, to be one of the 5% most dangerous so registered and then

b) On the 22^nd June 2009 caused the Appellant to be arrested and remanded in custody on dreamed up fire arms charges over a WWI antique Lewis machine gun and then

c) had the Appellant, on 7^th august 2009, sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, without even examining his own patient and then

d) without the appropriate qualifications and contrary to others with appropriate qualifications, recommended to a Crown Court, on 2^nd December 2009, that the Appellant be further incarcerated into Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison for the doctor’s own safety (see para39 of 19^th October 2009 psychiatric report) and then

e) The psychiatrist wrote that the Appellant had ‘significant brain damage’ with the court being told, in the forced absence of the Appellant, that he possibly had cancer’

f) The Appellant has NEVER been supplied with the evidence, clarification or retraction of such nonsense despite this Appellant’s last application before this very same Criminal Court of Appeal for that very same purpose

g) The mischief by Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams continues

Last July he signed a ‘victim’ statement that the Appellant had harassed him at his home with his wife, Dr Janis Hillier, also of Caswell Clinic, to such an extent that they are now both on ‘extended sick leave’. The lies continued in that he also stated police had to be called to the scene but with Appellant’s subsequent imprisonment ending by all charges being dropped.

4 Section 1 (3) of 1997 Harassment Act provides a DefenceThe Appellant was not allowed at the1^st December 2010 summary hearing, while facing ‘harassment’ allegations of the police doctor, at its subsequent 1^st March 2013 appeal or even at the 4^th May 2013 jury trial to put a legal argument that the police doctor had knowingly committed crime, due to police black mail and therefore the Appellant was permitted

a) that it was pursued for the purposes of preventing or detecting crime

b) that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment

c) that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable

Maurice J Kirk BVSc 14^th March 2013

SO WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4G0vYqzTc

At my age the evilness from UK courts' cartel is but small beer.

I broadcast a taste of last time I was in front of Their Lordships, in the Royal Courts of Justice, on another futile appeal, having served yet another prison sentance caused by Dr Tegwyn Williams, re a Cardiff judge daring to suggest, ney insult my intellegence, that he would order and obtain, bloody liar, for the NHS (Wales) to produce the evidence I was to be sent to Ashworth ipp as a public hazard.

Who filmed this, quite without my knowing and definitely without my approval , I do not know but had I known I would not of been so subservient......and the rest.

Dr Tewgwyn Wlliams black mailed by police to recommend to His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC that I be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison 'for his own safety'!..... see paragraph 39

4th Williams Psych Reprt 19 10 9.pdf

9 12 1 medical Kemp.pdf

Dr Tegwyn Williams' wrong doing?

The Appellant believes Dr Tegwyn Williams is an unaccountable Clinical Director who can call on NHS lawyers and NHS chiefs to cover up his wrongdoing. It is in papers, that were not before the Courts in this case, that Dr Tegwyn Williams is that unaccountable that he calls on the support of the Chief of local NHS and Welsh NHS to use police to stop complaints about him going to the General Medical Council

Dr TW to help his associates (some local police) in a civil dispute, Sectioned the Appellant, without first assessing him, when the Appellant was not a patient of those kinds of services.

Dr TW then entirely made up that the Appellant had significant irreversible brain damage and made application to indefinitely Section the appellant to High Security Hospital. He failed in his attempted to indefinitely Section as no other medical doctor would support him.

The point is that Dr Tegwyn Williams is not medically qualified to interpret brain scans, as that is the job of the neuro-radiologist who has training and qualifications so to do. Dr Tegwyn Williams does not use or invite anyone who was medically qualified.

The Clinic team wrote in the team assessment from the three monthly Sections at the Caswell Clinic, that they wanted to build a relationship with the Appellant as an outpatient and draw him in.

But each time the Appellant would attend Caswell clinic Dr Tegwyn Williams would arrange that Police were called to arrest him.

In the end, to prevent the General Medical Council acting on what Dr Tegwyn Williams does wrong, he brought zero tolerance prosecutions by claiming, in short, that lawful accurate comments that were not defamatory, made him feel harassed.

Changes in law and interpretations.

Does it matter that what the Appellant says is accurate and not defamatory and now changes in the law (reform of public order Section 5) also means that an insult is no longer meant to be harassment ?

Also Courts have decided to recognise playful or eccentric comments as not malicious and with the example of a jovial threat to blow up the airport as meaning to be light hearted.

That light hearted meaning is very relevant to the Appellant as his ‘Wanted posters’, were clearly meant to be light hearted comment from a man well now as a harmless eccentric.

Where is the proportionality in wanting to imprison a 67 year old man for making accurate, reasonable, eccentric, light hearted but entirely justified and necessary comment ?

Stafford NHS scandal, the Need for Freedom of Expression and Appellant’s course of conduct and alleged Breach, can stop suffering and worse.

Mr Jeremy Hunt, the Coalition Health Minister encourages the need for people to be able to speak out when things go wrong in the NHS and that no gagging Orders should exist on NHS conduct. Especially as around 1200 people needlessly died at Stafford as there was no where to complain and little way to speak out

There are said to be at least fifteen other hospital Trust like Stafford.

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and “incompatibility”

The Appellant would be raises whether the Criminal Court of Appeal would grant permission for an application to ague “incompatibility” on how the Act is not compatible with Human and Fundamental Rights and that Parliament could not have known the effect that it’s legislation would have.

As we are aware it is for the Higher Courts to declare incompatibility and for Parliament to remove that incompatibility, if it so wishes.

It is said that the ‘course of conduct’ in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is unique to the UK. No other country has it. Other countries make do with stalking laws and other like measures. One reason why all other countries do not use ‘a course of conduct’ as a criminal offence is that it is said that this kind of law is open to too many problems and abuse.

One of the four cornerstones of EU law is that a person must be able to tell that their conduct would be a criminal offence. The UK law interprets that as would know with advice of a lawyer.

Yet full time Judges decide on if a course of conduct amount to harassment in ways that the best lawyers in the UK cannot predict how Judges will interpret what amounts to harassment in for example the zero tolerance, white collar, neighbour or family disputes. The appellant believes that means that the Protection from Harassment Act is clearly not compatible with EU law, and that is but one example.

With the Malicious Communications Act 2003, a new stalking law and various other measures and that the Harassment Act is know to be so widely over used and miss used, many call for the 1997 Act to fade away, in favour of expanding the scope of other laws

Maurice John Kirk BVSc

12 March 2013

My 64 page statement completed as police helicopter hovered over head as armed police surrounded the matrimonial home (see blog below of home and aerodrome up for auction due to a broken marriage) with frightend wife citing this incident, in divorce papers, due to Operation Orchid, to snatch our then 10 year old daughter at the same time as my hand cuffs clicked on.

Who will be next to suffer under power crazy South Wales Police Hierarchy?

09 06 19 64 pages of Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirkl.pdf

Maurice Kirk v Dr T W Williams.docx

11 03 10 Dr T W position statement (1).pdf

GMC.pdf

Glamorgan Gem 30th Sept 10.pdf

10 09 06 SWP_Claimant_interim_Skeleton.pdf

TO stop this trial from starting Dolmans, solicitors advised Barbara Wilding and MAPPA meetings in Caswell Clinic, would you believe, on how to instigate her Metropolitan Police intorduced tactic of a 'shoot to kill' policy but first she had had to get me registered MAPPA level 3, using Dr Williams, in order for it to be a 'lawful kill'

the 22nd June 09 police raid , using well over twenty, some armed, police officers, and helicopter, under Operation Chalice' to surround our home was co-ordinjated with anotter pack of police officers , under Operation Orchid' in order to snatch our daughter.....telling my wife I was so dangerous a threat to her and the general public our Genevieve was to be 'taken into care'. Kirstie had other ideas.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/aircaraft_and_airshows/South-Wales-Airfield-FOR-SALE.aspx

10 12 7 MJK MAPPA Executive Summary.pdf

To stop this on going trial , currently in Cardiff County Court, for police now proven police criminal conduct and harassment damages, from ever reaching cross examination stage, first it was 'my possession of a machine gun 'fiasco and then the State playing this fabricated medical 'findings', their 'Gulag Card', as seventeen years of police harassment, so far and HM assisted 'treacle treatment; whough Cardiff's iniquitous law courts had failed to block the true state of both our law courts , prisons and police forces, right across The Principality.

09 09 03 MG Trans Redacted.pdf

Their Lordships, together with the documentary evidence that Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams knowingly falsified, in the presence of South Wales Police officers, his Sect 9 countersigned witness statements, to obtain my false imprisonment, are to consider the 'ramifications' of the enclosed transcript from part of 4th May 12 'Breach of Restraining Order' conviction hearing, now the subject of their deliberations.

The transcript clearly indicates, just as in the 2010 'machine gun' scandalous jury tria, l was refused even my legal papers and personal court exhibits even in thew court room!

On 4th May2012 His Honour Judge Curran QC, whilst I was forced to be absent due to requiring urgent medical attention, had refused me Dr Williams or any others, named, to be either my 'character witness' or as a 'witness of fact'.

On 1st December 2011 District Judge John Charles had done exactly the same, in my absence, when he convict me for 'harassment' of Dr Williams following the publishing of further falsifed documents by Dr Tegwyn Williams, namely, my series of NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic psychiatric reports culminating, on 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court, that I be further sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, due to 'significant brain damage' and 'possible cancer', in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison.

Closer scutiny of my Casswel Clinic, Bridgend, medical records, discloses, as in his October 2009 psychiatric report, his other and most pressing reason as to why I had to be moved to Broadmoor or Ashworth was because of 'veiled' threats , he told me, of 'reprisals' by an old gentleman by the name of Norman Scarth!

T20120090 - Kirk - proc from 10.40 - 12.26 - 04.05.12.pdf

Experts in the field confirm there was no sign of relevant brain damage BEFORE Williams even writes the report without appropriate qualifications.

On 7th August 09, when he wrote his first released psychiatric report, [previous others only for MAPPA South Wales Police meetings], as His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC stated, when refusing, recently, to 'strike out' my one million pound damages claim against NHS (Wales), without evening examining his patient!

09 09 01radiologist scans report.pd

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 12 17 Court Hearing to Extend IPP.pdf

http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/03/20/the-supreme-court-on-harassment-purpose-and-rationality/#more-17700

You may like to Google 'The Real Maurice Kirk' and come to the County Court tomorrow and Crown court on Thursday

ps My birthday is on Tuesday

Quiz Time:

What does a Duchess, a dairy maid and a cow have in common

clue:

It was most unlikely my father fought on the D-Day Beaches

Answer:

Work it out for yourself

my e-mail is maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Subject:

Signing up to 'I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK' at PledgeBank.com

Please click on the link below to confirm your signature on the
pledge at the bottom of this email.

http://www.pledgebank.com/L/BVyQLvFuTJTaBt79hA

The pledge was created by Patrick Cullinane and reads:

'I will I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the
Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st
October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of
JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK but only if 150 other
people from the UK will do the same. We the People in the UK
have been denied our GUARANTEED RIGHTS to due-process via the
Common Law Trial by Jury, which is the Law of the Land.'

Yours,
the PledgeBank.com team

ends

D Notice? Glamorgan Gem reports about Maurice's Court Case but not his Asylum

SabineKMcNeill — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:41:00 GMT

This is another article in the local paper where Maurice lives when he is not in Brittany - as now on asylum.

The headline says: Flying Vet: Judge rules on abuse of process claim.

Click on the image to read the whole article. It's a reasonable summary.

Chief Constable to have Maurice Shot FRONT PAGE of Gem Newspaper

Maurice — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 07:55:25 GMT

Oh this web they weave all together: the victim, the local papers and everybody who has sympathy and empathy - either because they themselves have been victimised or because they just have a sense of what is right or wrong, aka conscience.

Here's the write-up in the Glamorgan GEM entitled 'Flying Vet' claims South Wales Police were out to get him.

Trial Day 7: Friday Sept 17, 2010: adjourned or not adjourned - that is the question!...

SabineKMcNeill — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:55:00 GMT

Friday 17th Sept 2010

I went to Magistrates, yesterday but refused to enter the court. Hence I simply handed in my original medical report from my own GP, which was not accepted by the Trial judge despite being backed with previous Dec 09 transcripts and Dr William's reports etc. I was given immediate adjournment.

Despite my late arrival due to the Magistrates, the trial progressed, the Judge allowing the police to put in legal pleadings to 'strike out' all three claims.

I brought it to the notice of the court that the police had done all this, some fifteen years ago, and had managed to have about three or four of the thirty odd incidents struck out. I discharged my Bristol lawyers for having 'wrong police force' or wrong facts in Particulars of Claim, despite countless reminders, appealed and had some restored. The judge stated all this was 'new to him' as the police legal team remained silent.

The court adjourned on the argument I was not 'not fit'. Dead right but I was 'not fit' all month!

Extra medical reports, lodged this week, caused the judge to adjourn, for around six months, the rest of the proceedings, as I understood it...

So I am even more confused now being told the trial will continue on Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday at 11am COURT 1, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre.

I did manage, however, to obtain His Honour's assurance that the MAPPA Executive Summaries, written in the past few weeks, under Dolmans guidance, be duplicated and given to District Judge Phillips by 4pm. This was the deadline for me to show the HM Prison HAD received my summons and application for judgment for £50,000, last summer, as they were referred to in the minutes of the monthly MAPPA meetings with prison, police and Caswell Clinic 'well represented'.

I also managed to ask that the HM Governor's 1st July 2010 prison document, denying any knowledge of my being under any MAPPA procedure, whilst in prison last year, be also duplicated and given to Judge Phillips before the 4pm deadline.

Reminding the court that Barry Magistrates, Cardiff Crown and now, this judge, had, so far, ALL continued to refuse to order either Dr Tegwyn Williams or Professor Roger Wood to reveal, on oath or statement, the information before Judge Bidder QC, required by my surgeons, His Honour suggested I have a new brain scan!

Catch 22 But this had been refused by the Cardiff hospital on the pretext my 'released' medical records did not cause the need!

My own 'petty debt actions', ONE, against Dr Williams, for costs incurred, in three wasted journey,s travelling to Caswell, Bridgend, on his 'assurances' the relevant documents would be 'handed out at the door' and TWO, for the Chief Constable delaying the renewal of my shot gun certificate, could not be suppressed any longer, within their silly little world and their respective response is as follows:

Redacted Caswell Clinic Medical Records
The Dr's Defences for petty debt hearing, due 2.30pm, Friday, 24th September 2010, disclose many before 'unseen' medical records under the control of NHS and the South Wales Police, some triggered following my 16th February 2010 MG11 written complaint of criminal conduct.

Interestingly, the police, on receit of my complaint, have never come back, refused to inform me of Crime reference number, progress or seek further information. Deja Vu?

Police have been always been willing to arrest me, on Dr Williams related matters, [roof of Caswell, 'Airborne delivery' of the evidence to Judge Cooke, top shirt pocket 'delivery' of Court of Appeal 'grounds']. But once confronted in the police cell, each time, on the matter of the fabricated medical records, at the original behest of CPS and police and am I 'fit to be interviewed'?, the police have simply slammed the cell door, thus cutting short the 'basic rights' afforded to an accused, like being medically examined after police assault and entitlement to be interviewed, under caution, while evidence is fresh for their duties on 'preservation'. Deja Vu?

If it were not for 'the right arm not knowing what the left arm is doing', in the South Wales Police none of these damning documents would ever have been disclosed. Some of these will be on Downloads, shortly, under Chief Executive of Abertawe Morgannwg University Local Health Board 15th Sept. letter from me, following the timely intervention by Welsh Assembly Health Minister, Edwina Hart AM.

Shot Gun Certificate Renewal
The police have been 'perspiring' over this application, for quite some time now, thus causing my petty debt action for damages leading to a favourable judgment. The Chief Constable knew full well, any disclosure needed to defend it, in the Cardiff Justice Centre, despite having that place 'completely buttoned up', or any High Court Appeal, next year, in London, should he be so minded as not to 'renew' my gun licence, will cause a' very real risk of' hidden unlawful MAPPA covert surveillance evidence being disclosed.

This is still urgently needed to be put before His Honour Judge Seys Llewlyn QC, for the current 10 week civil trial. That evidence would further prove the unlawful 'machine gun' imprisonment was utterly dependent on Dr Williams and Professor Wood's false medical evidence suggesting 'significant brain damage' and Barbara Wilding's Feb 09 false affidavit, she being the Executive Chair or her Deputy, at their irregular run monthly MAPPA meetings.

The police, I remember, told the 'machine gun' jury, in January trial, they had 'no record' of my ever having held a 'fire arms certificate' let alone a shot gun licence with the jury telling me afterwards, in the resteurant, they all concluded the police were obviously lying.

I must go back to bed now and get some rest, for I have a few other problems to address, the consequences of collateral 'machine gun' damage.

10 09 16: Police MAPPA Abuse on Front Page of South Wales' Leading Newspaper

SabineKMcNeill — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:01:00 GMT

The Glamorgan Gem has been following Maurice's legal battles and reported on numerous occasions.

Oct 01: 'Flying Vet' claims South Wales Police were out to get him

Sept 16: Evidence still to be called in case against police

Sept 10: 'Flying Vet' Kirk v South Wales Police

July 02: The Flying Vet's silence in court means he is back in prison

Mar 05: 'Flying Vet' is bailed

Feb 12: 'Flying Vet' not guilty

Feb 05: Flying Vet case takes dramatic turn as 'Foxy' gives evidence

Jan 29: Vet denies antique gun charges as court case opens

10 09 10: Judge orders investigation into MAPPA ’s relevance for Flying Vet’s current court proceedings

SabineKMcNeill — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:59:00 GMT

In his case before Cardiff County Court, Maurice Kirk, the Flying Vet, charges South Wales Police with countless false imprisonments, malicious prosecutions and failure to investigate crimes against him, his family, surgery and law courts, in particular, the court of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Without his knowledge, Mr Kirk was categorised MAPPA level 3 (posing serious risk of harm to the public) between June and December 2009. But Police denies the relevance of this supervision to current proceedings. MAPPA is short for “Multi-Agency Protection Arrangement” between Prison, Probation and Police. The law rules since August 2009, that offenders are kept informed of management meetings.

On trial day 1, September 7th 2010, Ex-Chief Constable of South Wales Police Barbara Wilding and Dr Tegwyn Williams, Director of South Wales Police Forensic Psychiatric Prison, Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, failed to answer to witness subpoenas served on them by the Claimant. However, Dr Ruth Bagshaw, who is psychologist and Clinical Lead at Caswell Clinic, is member of the Strategic Management Board of MAPPA South Wales Area. Hence they would have discussed the ‘senior management oversight’ required for level 3 offenders. Mr Kirk’s lawyers maintain that there has not been an offence, hence he is not an offender.

Judge Seys Llewellyn QC had ordered on 17August 2010 that the Police’s solicitor should make urgent enquiries and provide a statement by 31 August 2010 with MAPPA details. Mr Kirk had not seen any MAPPA related documents until Adrian Paul Oliver of Dolmans Solicitors followed the order to give details about dates, documents and discussion at meetings. According to MAPPA information sharing protocol, such documents are to be passed on to the ‘offender’ since the law changed in August 2009. When detained in prison on 1st July 2010, Mr Kirk was given written confirmation that he is not subject to MAPPA and that “all information indicates that you never have been”.

Mr Kirk has been jailed 20 times and spent 12 weeks in Caswell Clinic, where he was diagnosed with supposedly incurable brain damage and possibly cancer. These medical records are now required by his surgeons for an urgent hip replacement. On trial day 2 the judge adjourned until next Monday.

Dr Tegwyn Williams is expected to appear in court on Monday September 13th when proceedings recommence at 11am. The trial is expected to rely on disclosure of evidence and to last for 10 weeks.

Mr Oliver’s statement does not contain details about other levels of categorisation previously managed. Category 1 applies to sexual and Category 2 to violent offenders. Category 3 refers to offenders who pose a risk of serious harm such as terrorists.

"We have been following your ‘trials and tribulations’ with some sadness here in Florida. So sad that your own country men would treat one of the last true British Explorers with such cruelty and stupidity. Please know that at least all the tail dragger pilots in the world are rooting for sanity to prevail in your case.” Tom Frohne, Florida

CONTACT

Maurice J Kirk on 07907 937 953, maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Sabine K McNeill on 07968 039 141 or in Germany 0049 33876 90166, email sabine@3d-metrics.com

EDITORS' NOTES

1. The Forum for Stable Currencies campaigns to comply with the rule of law, see also http://edm1297.info/

2. Victims Unite! and Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police are published by Sabine K McNeill

10 09 06: Flying Vet on Morphine in Court as Medical Records not Released

SabineKMcNeill — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:25:00 GMT

Despite receiving morphine and other strong pain killers, Maurice J Kirk will act as Claimant and Plaintiff in Cardiff County Court on Tuesday, September 7^th. His hip replacement was scheduled to take place on July 20^th, but surgeons refused to operate without medical records. While a psychiatrist claimed serious brain damage and possibly brain tumour, Kirk’s many attempts to get access to his records or an adjournment of trial have failed.

Known as the Flying Vet, Maurice Kirk has suffered from harassment by South Wales Police since 1977. Harassment included being jailed 20 times and sectioned in a psychiatric hospital, besides enduring police ignored arson, the stealing of cars and motor bikes and numerous break-ins into his surgery in five years.

This list is far from being exhaustive, as he filed nearly 50 judicial review applications and won over 100 cases whilst only losing twelve. Mr Kirk has discovered so much police criminality that he relies on the web as the most transparent publishing medium, even though his website was closed down by judges and emails were blocked, too.

Maurice Kirk wants to let the general public know about the reality of what he calls “HM Partnership”, the collaboration between agencies that even succeeded in getting him struck off the registry of Veterinary Surgeons. “Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangement” (MAPPA) is the technical term to justify the kind of surveillance that he has been suspecting for decades.

It now emerged that Mr Kirk was under MAPPA management Category 3 from 8^th June 2009 until 17^th December 2009. This was released following the Court’s request for information and was identified by Adrian Paul Oliver of Dolmans in Cardiff.

Mr Oliver’s statement does not contain details about other levels of categorisation previously managed. Category 1 applies to sexual and Category 2 to violent offenders. Category 3 refers to offenders who pose a risk of serious harm such as terrorists. However, Mr Kirk’s solicitor claims there is no offence, hence Mr Kirk is no offender. Furthermore, Cardiff Prison denied MAPPA surveillance whilst he was in their custody.

The trial is about countless false imprisonments, malicious prosecutions and failure to properly investigate crimes committed against Mr Kirk and his family in his house, surgery, law courts and, in particular, the court of The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. It is expected to rely on disclosure of evidence and to last for 10 weeks.

"It is utterly disgraceful and unacceptable in any civilised society that a man and his family who have been so badly harmed by public officials are not offered any redress, remedy or resolution, let alone apologies or compensation. White collar crime is much more pervasive than most people know, but governments deny responsibility. We hope that the Coalition Government with its intent to take white collar crime as seriously as any other, will bring justice where injustice has ruled.” Sabine K McNeill, Web Publisher

CONTACT

Maurice J Kirk on 07907 937 953, maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Sabine K McNeill on 07968 039 141 or in Germany 0049 33876 90166, email sabine@3d-metrics.com

EDITORS' NOTES

1. The Forum for Stable Currencies campaigns to comply with the rule of law, see also Enforce

2. Victims Unite! and Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police are published by Sabine K McNeill

Before Trial Day 7: Letter to HM Treasury Solicitor

SabineKMcNeill — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:47:00 GMT

On Friday 17th September the court is likely to hear that police, in law, are immune to prosecution and the matter will lead to a £800,000 bill for Maurice, NO, now £1,200,000!

All invited for tomorrow's 'fireworks' (proceedings) Cardiff County Court 11am - Maurice is buying the lunch.

Judge quickly switches part heard MAPPA 'argument' in court, revelations becoming rather too embarrassing for the 'Welsh authoirites', to offer for South Wales Police to 'strike out' all three Claims for damages, after eighteen years of litigation, it having already been argued and lost in a previous court!....DOWNLOADS will explain why.

Gem Newspaper catches judge say, "the matter of whether the case is 'achievable' had yet to be considered"...see DOWNLOADS.

In preparation, Maurice sent this letter to HM Treasury Solicitor.

Police MAPPA Abuse on Front Page of South Wales' Leading Newspaper

Maurice — Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:32:35 GMT

Gem newspaper is only just 'scratching the surface' of the 'Subjective Malice' and 'False Imprisonments' re 'Trading in Machine Guns' for this 10 week trial of years of covert police surveillance by South Wales Police Hierarchy paid for by YOU.

HRH Prince of Wales recieves 1st Letter

Maurice — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:04:00 GMT

Newspaper cutting has sparked a lot of interest on the 2 web sites