Search results matching tags 'Caswell Clinic' and 'Cardiff County Court'

Norman Scarth RN Rtd WW2 Hero Jailed following Sincere Protest needs Your Help!

Maurice — Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:13:00 GMT

HELP NORMAN CAMPAIGN Prison Number A1903 CF

Video: A Den of Evil - Maurice Kirk & Norman Scarth in court 28/6/2011

World War 2 veteran, of HMS Standfast sinking of the Scharnhorst and campaigner against the corruption in English and Welsh Judicial System, that is now rife and where the General Public do not realise just what is going on!

Nearly all the Judgments are written out before the hearing has even taken place, especially if politically sensitive. Pensioner Norman Scarth has been sentenced to 6 months in prison for recording in court without permission. All mail sent to prisoners is vetted and censored and every word must be checked. To show your support please send anything, telephone directories, books, magazines, old Shopping Catalogs, old newspapers, any old WW1 machine guns you may have lying about to:

Norman Scarth
c/o Leeds Prison
2 Gloucester Terrace
Stanningley Road
Leeds
LS12 2TJ

To keep Norman's spirits up, include hidden messages by highlighting a few words, like 'Helicopter coming next Tuesday', if that fails, 'Captain Kirk in his Starship on Wednesday' or 'file in a Breton loaf', etc. Please pass this on to everyone you know and send this campaign viral!

(PS Norman, I have commissioned, without the requisite planning permission, for the first tunnel to be dug)

'Mindset' of South Wales Police

A topical sample of what Norman is fighting about

Paragraph 10 of 25^th July 2011 Welsh court "note of judgment" could not be further from the truth and the trial judge very well knows it.

It was Mr Kirk, not legal services, police or the court who made the court application. In October 08 Mr Kirk had been refused the disclosure of the identity of police at incidents involving him and his veterinary practice, incident numbers, progress and findings of his numerous reported thefts, burglaries, criminal damage and arson etc on his practice cars and property.

Not one of some 40 odd incidents were properly addressed by the police and disclosed to the injured party.

The parting management judge, HHJ Nicholas Chambers QC, having granted Mr Kirk a jury trial, earlier, only for police to have it overturned, therefore ORDERED the Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding and no one else, was to swear and sign, within the first week of January 2009, an affidavit that Mr Kirk had had full disclosure!

Mr Kirk knew, that early October 08, when he posted the application his life would now be seriously threatened and so took the necessary precautions, particularly within his family to safeguard further loss likely to occur. The inevitable collateral damage was obvious once the proverbial '*** hit the fan'.

The police ignored the judge's court order to disclose information of incidents, of course, in a similar fashion as witnessed throughout the past 20 years of this litigation. Ms Wilding, however, promptly handed in her resignation.

It was not until Mr Kirk entered the police lawyer's offices, Dolmans, some six or seven weeks after the court order dead line, he stating the arrest of Ms Wilding if she did not immediately sign. She signed the false affidavit within the hour!

Contrary to 25^th July 2011 judgment no police took Mr Kirk to Bridgend police station on 18th June 2009..... He went of his own volition and made a detailed statement of complaint because the police at HQ refused. His complaint at their other police station was promptly shredded.

Dolmans were asked to quickly write a statement of complaint on the 20^th, in order to arrest Mr Kirk using an armed police helicopter raid on Mr Kirk's home. On the following day, with 20 odd men, some armed for back up, hoards of police surrounded the premises as Mr Kirk and his family was having tea in the garden.

Operation Chalice was, within minutes of helicopter overhead aborted only to repeat the whole exercise, the next day, 22ndJune2009!

Next day police included ‘Operation Orchid', in the dawn raid, using a 2nd squat team to snatch, Genevieve, Mr Kirk's then 10 year old daughter, on the pretext of the dreaded welsh social services opinion, reliant on falsified Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric reports, made her environment far too dangerous to remain with either her mother or father.

South Wales Police had been promised the support of a string of bent Welsh judges, in the cartel, to keep Mr Kirk locked. It was the machine gun trial judge, the thoroughly deceitful Paul Thomas QC who, apart from many other abuses of Article 6, refused Mr Kirk the right to ask just why the two raids on his house was needed and why one at all, when the police knew, all the time, there was no WW1 Lewis machine gun in his possession?

Para10, is just an example of police drafted documents riddled with deliberate lies, this time backed by another head of the current incestuous Welsh judiciary, this time in the civil sector. Are you surprised, after following the disgusting conduct of Nicholas Cooke QC, Recorder of Cardiff, caught on tape, attempting to lock Mr Kirk away without trial?

It was from that very day, 25th Feb 2009, MAPPA and Dr Tegwyn Williams were mobilized by the Crown Prosecution Service and the South Wales Police, with their introducing spurious excuses to set me up to be shot. By using this carefully picked local trial judge, it is assured that certain past incidents and court cases, identifying 20 years of covert police surveillance and court corruption, none of it will ever reach a witness box.

Dolmans, solicitors, even printed out, in the affidavit, the Chief Constable had ‘no knowledge of court cases' and even the incident when police used a crow bar and sledge hammer to break into Mr Kirk's veterinary surgery when they could have just asked for a key! A squad of police had put back an apparently evicted police inspector's daughter that had been squatting in the flat overhead with a man involved in drugs.

This trial judge has tried to fool the website readers, in his judgment, by stating that the police did not commence 24/7 armed protection of Wilding until after Mr Kirk's 18th June 2009 detailed complaint of perversion of justice, at Bridgend police station.

He has just refused to release MAPPA minutes identifying the very names ,dates and places of the conspiracy to kill...that is how evil these judges are in Wales really are and no one is doing anything about it

Norman is, mind you but the politicians, most culpable continue to turn a blind eye and sit on their hands waiting for their pension.

Immediately after Mr Kirk's entry to the inner sanctum of Wilding's office block, to exchange witness statements, right inside the Bridgend police HQ heavily guarded compound, he was, much later, surrounded by a heavily armed flack jacketed squat team, in tin hats, brandishing automatic weapons and stun and smoke grenades around their belts.

Now readers may understand why Elizabeth Paul, a seasoned social worker or another from Caswell Clinic, Bridgend Psychiatric prison leaked part of the MAPPA minutes of 8th June 2009 shedding more light on the conspiracy to having Mr Kirk shot. If that failed Dr Tegwyn Williams was at hand to having me, whilst unconvicted, locked away for life in Ashworth high security psychiatric prison

Norman Scarth knows this language only too well which is why he needs your help, NOW, before they try playing, on him, their ‘Gulag card' to be locked away for life.

Only this morning, 28th July, my 4th general practice in just over 12 months, trying to get sight of myown medical records has failed.

Following the South Wales Police plot to getting me shot and Dr Tegwyn Williams employed to falsify my records in his Gulag prison the NHS (Wales) is running scared instead of giving proper disclosure of just what else went on, in Caswell Clinic, with a string of bent judge, police and a rogue doctor to fail their mission.

Who will be next, Norman?

It more than stinks, doesn't it?

It is time we took to the streets with ‘Lawful Rebellion'... and that means YOU!

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com Tel 0790 793 7953

Police MAPPA Conspiracy to have me Shot, well, I have just bought a Firearm to Defend Myself which means Anarchy and Blood Spilt on Streets of Cardiff & Bradford

Maurice — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:55:00 GMT

Court of Appeal sent

Notice that Friday 29th July Hearing

Cancelled and adjourned to

9.45am 28th September 2011

Apologies for all those who had planned to come. However, the Dr Tegwyn William's case is still at 2pm 29th July where he will attempt to get the case struck out! Any one needing copy of Particulars of Claim/false psychiatric reportsetc please e-mail me maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

But as to why, we will hear about later .

‘Pass the Parcel' or ‘Rivers of Blood'?

Yesterday, as I was leaving Cardiff County Court, I was accosted by two plain clothed policemen in the foyer who asked me if the current blog on my website, http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/, meant ‘I had bought a shot gun' and could I explain, ‘blood on the streets of Cardiff and Bradford'?

I asked, before I could answer, that I needed to be reminded of the exact wording. The two police were unable to repeat the exact words or provide a copy of the blog article. I was then asked what form of transport I was using. Was there was any legal obligation, on my part, to answer that question either, I asked? I did not wait for their answers and left.

Deja Vu, Maurice? Are they sure it wasn't another machine gun I had just bought?

So, somewhat perplexed, I went to the Central police station to try and establish just why I had not been set up to be shot, like last time, as a level 3 MAPPA most dangerous, now roaming the streets of the UK?

Why, then, was I not arrested and remanded in custody again, for nearly eight months or, at least, cautioned and interrogated for days?

On the previous occasion, in June 2009, police attention related to an advertisement for the sale a dilapidated decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine gun, attached to the nose of my DH2 replica fighter aircraft. She was used for air displays, including the Farnborough Air show and the gun advert had been currently running in aviation magazines, including a CAA one and had been on my web site for over eight years!

The aircraft and antique Lewis had been sold well over a year before to a display team in England. The new owner, an ex RAF armourer had managed to get her working but as the jury commented, why was he not, with the original owner who sold her to me, also in the dock?

During cross examination it was established the Welsh police, English police not touching the incident with the proverbial ‘barge pole', convert her back to looking like when I was the owner.

The CAA's handling of this was, in particular, interesting and in the way they ordered all other four ‘guns' to be rapidly removed from the RAF Hendon museum and elsewhere.

The jury particularly noted how the Welsh trial judge repeatedly intervened each time I wished to examine the exhibit for traces of the new owner' paint, I could see from the dock, left in the cracks of the magazine.

The jury, after the first day of cross examination, also commented of the obvious gap in the audit trail, in the two thousand mile journey around the UK, whilst police, often driving alone, took a prohibited weapon to the South Wales Police forensic unit for their ‘modifications'.

It stinks doesn't it?

So, at least, there was no armed police response unit this time, exceeding twenty five officers in the dawn raid and an armed police helicopter overhead directing operations.

Well, there must have been MAPPA involvement again?

Multi Agency Public Protection arrangements or IAG (Independent Advisory Group) with senior police must have occurred with another type ‘Operation Chalice' or Operation Orchid military agenda.

[This coming Friday's hearing includes my appeal for further disclosure of 2009 MAPPA minutes, some already leaked. This must now be expanded for the latest 20011 records kept in Police HQ, Bridgend, including the air brushing out of all my involvement with MAPPA at the 4pm 17^th December 2009 Caswell Clinic meeting , chaired by Dr Tegwyn Williams in the presence of the Defendant (Respondent), the South Wales Police ]

The latter ‘operation' was the code name, last time, to snatch our then ten year old daughter by Welsh Social Services, terrifying my then wife, almost witless, the Chief Constable stating our home was far too dangerous for Genevieve's safety.

Disappointingly, at the front desk of Cardiff Central, I was told the police inspector, ‘in charge' of this new fire arms case, was ‘unavailable' and ‘no one else could help'!

So I took the opportunity to finding out what progress there was, at least, following my two years of detailed complaint on the 'machine gun' incident that lead to my incarceration where, once locked up, I was falsely sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act with repeated police applications to Cardiff Crown Court that I must be sent to Ashworth high security psychiatric prison, before or after the trial, effectively for life.

No progress for me, apparently, which was of no great surprise, bearing in mind both previous and current Chief Constables of South Wales Police, Dolmans, their lawyers defending my nineteen year running damages claim against them and Dr Tegwyn Williams, following new evidence, all featured in the advice from Bristol magistrates that I direct the serious indictable allegations back at the Recorder of Cardiff.

Within ten days, despite the new evidence, including part of some of the leaked MAPPA minutes, the Chief Executive for the South Wales Police Authority, a Mr Fry, stated in his 19th July 20011 letter:

'I do not intend to investigate your case further '.

But hang on a moment, what, if at all, has he examined, in such a short space of time??????

No one has come back to me or to my named witnesses, for further and better information.

But, hang on a moment, was it not, in June 2009, Judge Cooke QC, the Recorder of Cardiff, who attempted to close down my website for the second time, while I was in prison, the judge being caught on tape, scheming with the CPS over manipulated Texas State Psychiatric Prison records, also denied me, when deliberately excluding me from the hearing.

But hang on a moment, was it not, on 2^nd December 2009, the police CPS prosecutor and rogue doctor, Tegwyn Williams with Judge Bidder QC were also caught scheming on the tape, for the police to obtain my imprisonment for life and so avoid the imminent civil also refusing me bail after hearing the most bizarre of arguments?

Who cares, in these days of judicial and policing meltdown in Cardiff?

Remember twelve or so Cardiff police now currently facing an ongoing trial for another case of 'bullying' witnesses, just to send innocent to jail, 'The Cardiff Four'.

But there is a Crown Court procedure, Norman reminds me, to deal directly with serious criminal offences that occurred in their own courts!

Bullying, in the South Wales Police? Perish the thought!

I left Cardiff Central Police Station and went straight to the Crown Court, next door, to establish why judge Cooke's delay, following my handing in to him, on 5^th July, a list of criminal allegations, some as 'private prosecutions' to finally bust their corrupt judicial money making game and possibly, their ‘Achilles Heel'.

Charges included ‘shoot to kill', ‘attempted murder', ‘perversion of justice', ‘false imprisonment' and ‘falsification of medical records' to pervert the course of justice', all implicating the South Wales Police , their lawyers and, of course, Dr Tegwyn Williams of South Wales Police Forensic Unit, Caswell Clinic, Bridgend.

I was refused entry to the Crown Court building...."You are not allowed in". "Is that a promise?", I asked

The Cardiff Crown court manager told me the learned judge had directed them to Cardiff Magistrates, of all places!

But was that not the same place as District Judge Brown had ruled earlier on similar but different charges to Bristol? He had said each private prosecution was laid from a man appearing to be suffering from a 'paranoid delusional disorder' in that he believed he was being persecuted by the South Wales Police.

I refused to leave the Crown Court, wishing to be a member of the public to watch the allegedly corrupt South Wales police officers under cross examination in the ongoing 'Cardiff Four' alleged falsified police evidence, those many years ago.

"We will call the police", said the manager, "and they will arrest you". So I waited and waited for the 75 yard journey from the police station, opposite to be traversed by armed police men.

I had even asked two in a squad car, right outside the court front door, to stay a minute as there was about to be a possible 'breach of the peace' and would need their assistance (in an arrest) as I ‘forced entry' into the court building. Eventually it was established the police had refused to attend so I promptly left.

Just another indication of just how serious things have become, here, in South Wales, leaving little alternative for many, to take to the streets in order for the ‘thinking section' of our politicians to restore law and order.

So, on leaving the court building, off I trot to the magistrates, next to Cardiff prison, only to be told no one knew anything about the case coming from the Recorder. It took just under forty minutes, there being no intention of my leaving the building, following the threat I was going to be forcefully evicted.

Eventually the court clerk admitted the ‘possible' file was locked up in the court filing cabinet but no one, available, had a key!

Enid Blyton could not have done better.

Let us see what Mr Justice, from the Royal Courts of Justice, thinks about all this on Friday, 29^th July, at 10am, in Cardiff Justice Centre.

MAPPA minutes conspiracy, of 'shoot to kill' by South Wales Police in June 2009 and when that failed, Welsh Social Services storming our home, protected by armed police,dogs and helicopter, should I resist their snatch attempt of our 10 year old daughter.

All this was pre planned and agreed and recorded by South Wales Police, Welsh Social Services, Probation and Dr Tegwyn Williams' Caswell Clinic Psychiatric prison. Police were desperate to kill me off or delay me, as a Claimant, from prosecuting 20 years of police bullying, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonment.

Some Caswell Clinic staff, unbeknown to the Director, Dr Tegwyn William, also attending 2009 MAPPA monthly meetins, during my incarceration, have now leaked their official record to confirm the above.....see downloads for documents etc.

Prolonged imprisonment had nothing what ever to do with ten Cardiff judges who, ever since, simply rubber stamped a Section 35 Mental Health Act Order or refuse bail as I was considered in the top 5% most dangerous.

So, when I won the machine gun trial, on 9th february 2010 why was I released without explanation? To fool the tax payer and general public my farcical trial and nearly eight monrths imprisonment was lawful?

And what about the Dr Williams' numerous false medical reports, to keep me locked up, stating I had 'significant brain damage' and possible brain tumour/

No one in Wales has ever told me about my percieved malady.... Not without trying mind you. I am unable to retain a GP, for the politics implicated or even get a brain scan!

I had to go to France to get one.

It took quick action by my kid sister, Celia, in Jersey, to obtain a transcript account of 2nd December 2009 clandestine hearing, with Dr Williams , CPS barrister, Richard Thomlow and equally evil, Judge Neil Bidder QC, all huddled mumbling together in some corner of a Cardiff Crown Court unaware someone had, inadvertently, switched the tape recorder on!

Me, not allowed out of my cell, this incestuous cabal of what is now so sick in our UK law courts discussed whether the three of them had, at last, enough to have me locked away for life, possibly, in Ashworth t high security psychiatric prison.

29th July Court of Appeal hearing will reveal more about the deceit riddled Welsh police protected by their cosy relationship with its very own, they hope, wicked judiciary.

Achilles Heel

NOW Cardiff judges are blocking my Private Criminal Prosecutions, re Dr Tegwyn Williams, Barbara Wilding and Adrian Oliver,which will also be before 29th July Court of Appeal Hearing 10 am at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre. A mere few nanoseconds, on each issue, I am informed, is the order of the day.

There is going to be trouble, big time.....

But it is a people's court, isnt it, needing a jury to decide.

Imagine, if you can, the police, represented in court for the past around sixteen years, have offered no opposition to disclosure of the MAPPA minutes to me, under PII (Public Interest Immunity).

The judge, HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC, striking out the politically sensitive incidents of 35 ot so, in my first three of six actions for damages, has read the minutes also!!!!

His Honour told the court no names of the agencies or secretary, making seven monthly minutes, appear on the copy given to him by the MAPPA Co ordinator, Nigel Rees!!!

IS IT NOT LONG OVERDUE FOR LAWFULL REBELLION in OUR LAW COURTS?

And where better to start than Cardiff? Bradford?

Cockeyed Cardiff Court Conspiracies, as predicted

The Cardiff Court, hearing, last week, was to consider the disclosure of MAPPA minutes, created following seven clandestine monthly meetings in police stations or Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, commencing on the 1st and 8th June 09 with South Wales Police, Probation, psychiatric staff and/or prison personnel etc. They all sat around a table conspiring to have me shot.

Caswell Clinic staff, at the first meeting included social worker Elizabeth Paul and TG, [substantial reward for TG identification], are identified in leaked memo.

Yesterday, realising I knew Elizabeth Paul and Dr Tegwyn Willliams had attended my MAPPA meetings with high ranking police officers, the proposed trial judge ruled I could not, during the substantive trial, next year?, from around one hundred witnesses or so, call any of those at each MAPPA meeting, revealed by cross examination.

[ Do they just make up this Enyd Blyton stuff, as the mood fancies?]

Again a substantial reward is offered for the names of each government or Welsh Assembly employee who were at one or more of the seven, at least, clandestine MAPPA meetings. The police continue to be allowed to hide identity of police at incidents, court documents and even incident numbers!!!!

The 29th July Court of Appeal at 10am is destined for another absolute farce, to cover up the wide spread corruption in Cardiff courts.

When failing to getting me shot, leaving my arrest for several weeks, I am imprisoned for trading in an antique decommissioned machine gun, attached to my replica WW1 display aircraft! Sold a year earlier, the remaining six MAPPA meetings diverted to achieve my extended imprisonment under the 1983 Mental Health Act, all present looking for an IPP (Imprisonment for Public Protection).

Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, in July 09, asking in court,i my being refused right to attend, if my web site had been closed down yet? This rogue then quickly employed another local villain, the Welsh psychiatrist Dr Tegwyn Williams and almost managed my permanent imprisonment with the doctor submitting a string of false reports to at least six judges.All must have known, only too well, his evidence was most likely false, he not even bothering to examine me for his first 3rd August 09 report!

As to whether he was qualified to interpret a specialist brain scan, is obvioushe as he was vrelying on a psychologist mate from Swansea University with, apparently, no medical qualifications whatsoever!

This Professor Roger Wood, co-defendant in 29th july at 2pm hearing lied in his September 09 'medical report' of me, written to Dr Ruth Bagshaw, another witness, shortly to be heard on oath. When I won my Feb 10 'machine gun' case, he quickly re-wrote the report, promised my incarceration for life, back dating it to the same 09 letter to Dr Ruth Bagshaw of Caswell Clinic, but refering to a retired chief of police, Barbara Wilding who did not in fact retire until 31st Dec 09!

These are just a few examples of the games they regularly play in the Welsh law courts with the ‘Taffia' and their priority 'gravy train', desperate for an independent judiciary, almost like Scotland, no longer answerable to the English tax payer.

But you have heard nothing yet!

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC went on to say that he took the 'slim file' of MAPPA minutes from the police staff, a Mr Nigel Rees and read it, only to promptly return it to police HQ, Bridgend, refusing even to take a copy or indicate the minutes' content, neither identifying the author or just who was present...

Police lawyers argued the file was not ‘police property' and only consisted of Agencies' notes under the control of the Probation Service! More porky pies.

No one would tell me, in court, as in prison, just which agencies were at the meeting's discussing my likely demise or permanent incarceration.

Why? to prevent my court disclosure applications to the High Court judge, next week, he being sent down from London by the notorious HM Court Service (Wales), to go through the motions of why the main incidents have been ‘struck out' in my nineteen year quest for so called justice.

Spurious non sensicle arguement is their regular game now in our law courts,licenced to print money and anwerable to no one.

On 29^thJuly at 10 am at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, before Mr Justice Kitchin or Beatson, possibly, and, again in the afternoon with Dr Tegwyn Williams' 'perverting the course of justice' case about to start, also funded by the NHS (Wales) ie the English tax payer, fighting now for his liberty, at 2pm........should be a bit of sport, free candy floss and sticky buns, at the interval, for all who come.

As with the machine gun damages claim lawyers for Williams will be applying for years of delay, all waiting for me to die.

Things then appeared to became even more farcical yesterday, when the judge stated the MAPPA ‘minutes', some already leaked to me, stating I was 'likely to get shot if I approached the Chief Constable', could not be found in Mr Nigel Rees's 'slim(e)' pile. Why not? Apparently each agency have their own notes and someone writes the minutes but who checks them as agreed?

The judge, when asked, my needing the names of those present, to give evidence, shortly, in the ‘machine gun' one million pound damages claim said, 'there are no names recorded in the minutes'..

The police lawyers were quick to add they had not seen the ‘minutes'! Laughable, if it was not so deadly serious.

The QC then attempted to persuade the judge the ‘minutes' were not under the ‘control' of the South Wales Police! I was, of course, refused the information as to just who did have overall control? the Crown Prosecution Service (Wales)?

Clearly the purported papers, before the judge, were highly unlikely to be the original and I said so, as with the ‘executive summary' of all seven months meetings, released by police HQ at Christmas, following my application, clearly having been frantically rewritten by the police, following the specific Court Order for disclosure.

Eventually the judge bent a little more by ordering a copy of the purported ‘minutes' to be secured by the court,after all, in a ‘sealed envelope', to be signed by him on each page, following my allegations that the ‘original' minutes could not have been disclosed, if there were no names on it and a vote recorded being taken, each month, as to a true and fair account of the previous proceedings!

Due to the manner in which I had been registered, by Cardiff's capricious cabal, as top level 3 MAPPA, in the top 5% most dangerous 'at large', set up for a few weeks to be shot by police marksmen, is it not the makings of an amusing new board game or class action at the Court of Human Rights?

The MAPPA last purported meeting was in Caswell Clinic, on the 17^th December 2009, with me in 'solitary', in Cardiff prison, just before the ridiculous ‘machine gun' trial.

Now, with Dr Tegwyn Williams obviously being made to withdraw his scandalous allegations of my brain tumour and permanent brain damage, by the Princess of Wales only brain scan, in August 09, being leaked by yet another well wisher or old veterinary client, just what will they try next?

Would I have loved to have been a ‘fly on the wall' in that meeting, only for my MAPPA encounter to be 'air brushed out' of the MAPPA records like Austin State Psychiatric Hospital did in Texas, USA, following my lawful landing in a farmer's field over four miles away from President Bush's ranch.

Re "anarchy" by Sabine K McNeill: it should be noted that Tony Farrell, Principal Intelligence Analyst of South Yorkshire Police, was dismissed after he concluded that the "enemy from within", aka state terrorism, and the complete breakdown of confidence in Government, presents a far greater risk for violence than any other outside foe.

See Terror threat is in UK Government (video interview) or British Police Intelligence Analyst Tony Farrell: 9/11 and 7/7 are Acts of Internal Tyranny.

You could also take the risk of reading about that a 'false flag attack' was planned to take place in Berlin. But, thanks to two lawyers who submitted a 400-page document and another very different report to the highest official authorities and a LOT that happened on the net, especially www.26-06-2010.de, the operation was cancelled. More on First we bomb Manhatten, the we nuke Berlin: 26-06-2011, 7:17pm

In the Court of Appeal Appeal Nos. CF029/2011a & CF030/2011a

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, Cardiff, South Wales at 10am 29^th July 2011

Maurice John Kirk v South Wales Police (6 Actions)

Appellant applies to court to:

1. Uphold the Bristol District Judge's 4^th July 2011 decision that Appellant's private criminal prosecutions are dealt with by the Cardiff Crown Court where most of these criminal offences took place.

2. Examine Dr Tegwyn Williams falsified numerous court reports, between 7th August and 17th December 2009 inclusive, for the Chief Constable, CPSand agencies within MAPPA, disclosed in leaked MAPPA minutes, to keep the Appellant locked up in prison and so prejudice these and other civil damages claims against the South Wales Police and order the NHS (Wales)m to carry out a follow up brain scan.

3. Overturn the 29^th June 2011Cardiff District Judge decision and issue summonses for these private prosecutions also to be dealt with by Cardiff Crown Court as English judge has already advised.

Cardiff Magistrate's decision, not to issue summonses against Barbara Wilding, Adrian Oliver and Dr Tegwyn Williams, was conveyed thus:

Dear Mr Kirk,

Your application to state a case, received on 5^th July 2011, has been considered by District Judge Brown. District Judge Brown deems the application to be frivolous, and in accordance with Section 111(5) Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, has refused to state a case.

Yours sincerely,

Sally Lewis
Legal Manager
Cardiff Magistrates' Court

4. Order current proceedings in the County Court be stayed pending the outcome of criminal proceedings in both Cardiff Crown Court and England's High Court.

5. Order current proceedings in the County Court to be stayed for a response from the Professional Standards Department, South Wales Police HQ, IPCC and an external police force, Gloucestershire, all of whom have had service of the relevant facts for an independent enquiry.

6. Order disclosure of original versions of ‘laid information' of ‘Breach of the Peace' allegation, every one different served or not served on Barry magistrates by Crown Prosecution Service solicitor, Jackie Seal in ‘struck out' incident at Vale of Glamorgan Show. Order the next version, handed to the Appellant, this time during Recorder of Cardiff's Crown Court hearing and final version handed to Bridgend magistrate's clerk also different to any other, causing allegation of BOP to be withdrawn for fear the Appellant would refuse a ‘bind over' and so go to prison.

7. Order witness summons to be served on Ms Jackie Seal, to attend with full records of the incident.

8. Order original overhead video of police, caught beating up Appellant in Newport Road, Cardiff, before being redacted of the police breaking into his car, thereby giving evidence of the full extent of the violent police assault, be disclosed the Court of Appeal judge

9. Order redacted overhead video of police, caught beating up Maurice Kirk in Newport Road, Cardiff, [see website videos],another ‘struck out incident' subject to appeal, released only after a year of appellant's refused applications to police, CPS, magistrates and Crown Courts.

10. Order summonses to be served to attend on those handling that video record of the incident.

11. Order original custody videos from Rumney and Roath Cardiff police stations, where Appellant was further beaten up by South Wales Police.

12. Order witness summons to be served on whoever recorded the videos and who had control of them only to be redacted from waist level upwards so as a court could not identify the assaulting police officers.

13. Order disclosure of Dr Metters' hand written notes, used at 8th June 2009 MAPPA meeting in Barry police station, to register the Appellant MAPPA level 3, top 5% most dangerous.

14. Order witness summonses to be served on social worker, Elizabeth Paul and disclose her original notes to identify, TG (? Dr Tegwyn Williams) and mental health nurse, also from Caswell Clinic, who attended the 8^th June 2009 Barry police station MAPPA meeting.

15. Order witness summons to be served on Dr Tegwyn Williams to attend with Appellant's medical notes created that caused his reports to be written and submitted to 7^th August, September, October, November and 2^nd and 17^th December 2009 Crown Court hearings, to oppose bail, seeking the Appellant be transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison for an indeterminate period.

16. Order a witness summons to be served on Nigel Rees, of South Wales Police HQ, Bridgend, to attend and confirm, from MAPPA agency records, the adjournment of the 2010 pre planned ten week civil trial, following Appellant's false imprisonment by police using false Dr Tegwyn Williams court reports to oppose bail, prolonged not just imprisonment but the date for the machine gun criminal trial thus preventing the Appellant from having surgery, in Wales, for a total hip replacement.

17. Order Nigel Rees to attend with a copy of the purported MAPPA minutes supplied to and signed by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC and a true copy identifying those who attended seven meetings to obtain the Appellant's continued imprisonment.

18. Order a witness summons to be served on Chief Inspector J Dave of South Wales Police to attend and explain why, at 4pm, on 17^th December 2009, immediately after the Appellant's refused bail application, in Newport Crown Court, all MAPPA dealings with the Appellant were quashed without explanation ever since.

19. Order witness summonses to be served on both Chief Constable and Adrian Oliver to attend and disclose evidence, in their control, confirming the appellant was in possession of a prohibited weapon, contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act and was a mental health risk to both his youngest son and youngest daughter. None of this was disclosed before the criminal trial or offered in evidence.

20. Order Adrian Oliver to attend with full particulars of his complaint, re ‘threat to commit criminal damage' causing the Appellant's arrest and custody, on 22^nd June 2009, having repeatedly refused previous Court Orders to so disclose.

21. Order HM Court Service (Wales), following HHJ Nicholas Cooke QC's order for the Appellant to have free court transcripts of 2009,T20097445 Machine Gun Case, to reimburse the Appellant.

22. Order HM Court Service (Wales), following HHJ Nicholas Cooke QC order to disclose Dr Tegwyn Williams' records of the Appellant, his patient, referring to his significant brain damage and suspected brain tumour, retained by the Cardiff Court following the 2^nd December 2009 hearing.

23. Order the Defendant to release the names and addresses of witnesses, for trial, in each of the hundred or so, police incidents, many witnesses traced from the South Wales Police Pension Fund available to the Defendant but not to the Claimant.

Does the Claimant have to resort to employing ex-News of the World reporters, to find witnesses already known to the defence?

A £10,000 reward, so far, for the whereabouts of some vital witnesses, known by the police, is not enough, apparently, to fight locally entrenched deceit denying the Claimant speedy remedy and a ‘level playing field'.

24. Order the consolidation of the Appellant's machine gun Action with two or more of previous Actions.

25. Order a criminal investigation to be expedited following the fresh evidence from the above named witnesses and information recently given to His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC of the continuing mindset of the Defendant with a string of furher false imprisonments, bullying, malicious prosecutions and harassment since the Appellant's 9^th February 2010 Crown Court acquittal and immediate release from prison.

His Honour was told eleven of the jury volunteered the fact their verdict was decided on the very first day of police evidence.

26. The Applicant appeals the MAPPA Orders 1, 2 and 3 of 12^th July 2011 Cardiff County Court, refusing disclosure or criminal investigation, to be transferred out of this incestuous environment of South Wales.

This list is not exhaustive due to the continuing conduct of both the South Wales Police and HM Court Service (Wales).

BEWARE, TAFFIA, , I AM OFF THE MORPHINE

Trial Judge Orders Release of South Wales Police Confidential MAPPA Minutes! Trouble Brewing?

Maurice — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:46:00 GMT

[Today's cockeyed court verdict on site tonight]

A huge police team of lawyers, today, respond by telling court and my supporters they have not even read them!

Am I to believe I live on some other planet or just crawled out from under a stone?

So is the judge expecting me to believe he is reading, tomorrow, before the 11am hearing continues, the original records?

Record of seven clandestine police meetings, first to get me arrested for trading in WWI antique Lewis machine guns and, once having me locked up in Cardiff prison, using a crooked doctor, a Dr. Tegwyn Williams of notorious Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, to fabricate reports, an excuse to stop the trial and apply to have me diverted to Ashworth high security prison, for life?

I really thought I was now off morphine and other such mind hallucinating drugs!

Dr Tegwyn Williams told countless Cardiff judges in 2009, I had ‘significant brain damage' and a possible brain tumour and was too dangerous to be released..

Interesting, he with no qualifications to do so, but no Welsh judge or Dr has ever bothered to tell me any of this, during my seven months incarceration in their Welsh hell hole, built purely to feed the 'Taffia gravy train'.

Dream on, boys and girls. I watched most days Dr Tegwyn Williams, in partnership with an NHS (Wales) administrator, quietly syphoning off appropriate Caswell Clinic patients to one of their very lucrative private clinics....all funded and paid for by the readers of this blog.

South Wales Police have a new problem now.. The trial judge is, simply, buggered.

By reading the forgeries tomorrow, he has to identify the authors of those who sat around the table in Barry police station on the 8^th June 2009, planning to having me shot. See this leaked report! E P stands for seasoned, no nonsence, Caswell Clinic social worker, Elizabeth Paul....seven more names of that frightening three month experience of mine, in Caswell Clinic, will trickle out on these blogs up to trial date when reach will receive a summonses to give evidence of what evilness they witnessed under Dr Tegwyn Williams

He also has to identify those at the remaining six meetings in Caswell Clinic, each month, all trying to thrash out another way, my now being in prison, of keeping me locked up, unconvicted, to screw up my prosecution of 10 years of extreme bullying by a police force that had clearly lost its head.

On the 17th Dec 2009, the last purported MAPPA meeting, someone removed my name from the register altogether! Tomorrow we might find out just who?

No one told me why I was no longer on MAPPA, just days before the farcical machine gun trial was due to start.....but 'truth will out'.

Tomorrow, at 11am in the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, the case continues and I suggest you should not miss it for ‘all the tea in China'.

The QC and solicitor, methinks, were lying today and should be arrested.

If the police do not now arrest Dr Tegwyn Williams the learned judge has new a very huge problem.

All welcome to witness!

Caswell Clinic staff, Barbara Wilding and Dr Tegwyn Williams etc will be among many new faces in the trial, all made to give evidence on oath. The trial is now listed in the New Year, which year is debatable, to last, they estimate, for only nine weeks.....just where do they dream up these porky pies?

Key prosecution witnesses, to confirm the extreme bullying by South Wales Polikce, have, after 19 years, just been located!

So boo to those who snear at the 'ram butting the dam'...today.there is a 'gurt' crack appearing.

Free candy floss and ice cream at the interval while the safety curtain comes down...

Just how Incestuous can this Cardiff Court get? QC, Solicitor or Judge to be Arrested on Monday? [Can o fwydod]

Maurice — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 08:46:00 GMT

On Monday, at 2pm, 11^th July, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre my machine gun/false psychiatric reports, damages claim starts, having been refused a jury or it being transferred to England. They are for South Wales Police's unlawful attempts to having me jailed my life, unconvicted and attempting to have my 10 year old daughter ‘taken into care' by the Welsh courts, NHS and Welsh Social Services.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC has already ‘struck out' an incident when police were caught on their own overhead road video [see website You Tube], beating me up in a Cardiff street and, later, in police cells and another incident he knows about, when the police withdrew reason for arrest aka ‘Breach of the Peace'. This judge ruled, "damages cannot be claimed against police if, after each incident complained of, you happen to pick up some criminal conviction, however trivial, whether related or not!"

This same judge, would you believe, has already refused to accept some 130 odd allegations, lost by the police, winning only around 12, is not an extreme example of police bullying !. He has ruled the first five Actions for damages will not be heard together, transfered to the High Court or will get a jury.

South Wales Police will be asking the same judge these latest damages claims, that caused me over seven months imprisonment, including three months of shear hell in Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison, must be adjourned for at least 5 years to allow the previous 5 Actions be heard, appealed and disposed of in their usual perfunctory way.

This Cardiff Cabal, of deceit and intrigue, have already managed to delay my 1st Action for damges for 19 years, my solicitor dying meantime, with key witnesses now either settled in old people's homes, senile or dead.

Come witness this judge block the recorded evidence of a criminal conspiracy by South Wales Police high ranking officers, in Barry police station and Caswell Clinic recorded in their own MAPPA minutes using the excuse it falls under PII, ie not in the public interest!

It stinks, doesnt it?

I am off the morphine so come witness real criminals being arrested, to eventually face private prosecutions by the people, their ‘Achilles Heel'.

Copy to HHJJ Seys Llewellyn 10^th July 2011

Dear Mr Oliver and His Honour Seys Llewellyn,

The Criminal Prosecution of Dr Tegwyn Williams and Merging all twenty years grievances into a case that Judges then approve to hear before a Jury in England

We refer to the letter 27 June 2011 regards case management hearing 11 & 12 July should not go ahead if the plan is to prevent fair trial, by not allowing access to justice of the opportunity to list all twenty years grievances into a case where selected issues of the twenty years can then go before a Court preferably before a jury.

We apologise to Mr Oliver for confusion in how the original transcript of letters (and specifically the letter 23 June 2001) on behalf of Mr Kirk are added to by many volunteers. I hope we can clarify as follows

Whereas Mr Kirk would know of grievance as to why private prosecutions could occur to many. To date, may be for reason of logistics, those of us who try to Mr Kirk write with more exactness, only have clear enough evidence ‘to immediately proceed' with a prosecution of a criminal case against Dr Tegwyn Williams, in England, if necessary.

It occurs to those of us who try to help Mr Kirk write in ways more suitable to helping the working of the Courts, that it is within Mr Oliver's responsibilities to his client SW Police that he would be eager to bring a criminal prosecution against Dr Tegwyn Williams, so as to distance SW Police from being tarnished by Dr Tegwyn Williams criminal conduct.

Given the basic evidence as below against Dr Tegwyn Williams is so very clear indeed, and obviously a very serious matter, if Police or their lawyers do not bring a prosecution against Dr Tegwyn Williams that leaves individuals in S.W. Police or individuals at their lawyers open to the charge of conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams. It is a clear enough case to be easily merit and be investigated by an outside police force.

I am sure a man of standing such as Mr Oliver would not wish the good name of his client SW Police or their lawyers be drawn into allowing credible allegations of criminal conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams. We therefore would like to hear from you as to how you propose to help facilitate a prosecution regards Dr Tegwyn Williams.

To clarify we remind that the clear criminal case against Dr Tegwyn Williams is that;-

Dr Tegwyn Williams wrote to and attended the Cardiff Crown Court, including on 2 December 2009, with information to substantially affect the outcome of the Crown Court and ways that could be expected to significantly contribute to losing Mr Kirk his liberty for life, by the single assertion that there was irreparable brain damage and possible brain tumour that affects behaviour.

Dr Tegwyn Williams must have known that Mr Kirk did not have brain damage (to affect behaviour) to merit indefinite loss of liberty.

Mr Kirk does not have brain damage from assessment in Wales, England and France

Dr Tegwyn Williams did not use anyone who is medically qualified to determine scans to say that Mr Kirk has ‘brain damage' and was not entitled to progress the view he did.

We ask you to receive this information with care and to be very clear, precise what you do with it and exactly who you pass it to at South Wales Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (Wales).

As stated, we feel that in such a clear case of wrongdoing by Dr Tegwyn Williams, anyone not acting to bring a prosecution when able to do so, may be obstructing justice or merit charges of being in a criminal conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams.

The outcome will also be added to the twenty years of events that we consider should go before a jury trial.

We look forward to hearing from your kind self with news of how Dr Tegwyn Williams criminal conduct is to be addressed.

Please would his Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn note that we feel the 'mindset' that may emerge from this letter can be so relevant to be ‘grounds to appeal' following the decision of HHJ Seys Llewellyn on 11 and 12 July 2011.

Because the ‘mindset' here can indicate whether there was substantial unfairness in previous cases, before His Honour Seys Llewellyn, to even justify changes to case law, we feel it should all be addressed.

We see grounds for using the EU Court of Human Rights limited on the kinds of such ‘very clear' issues as above.

Yours,

Mackenzie Friends from around the world

Another approach is this, below or anarchy, perhaps and we take to the streets not forgetting other methods, in reserve, to concentrate their evil little minds.

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre 11^th July 11 Hearing for MAPPA Disclosure and application to put off Machine Gun Damages Claim for Five Years

Kirk v South Wales Police    6 Actions for Damages

Kirk v NHS, Dr Tegwyn Williams, Professor Wood, HMP Prison Cardiff

Applications

1. A can of worms or a can of worms?

2. Last two years ‘mindset' of South Wales Police calls for the trial judge to re consider his 2010 judgments, currently subject to appeal.

3. Transfer all litigation to England

4. Transfer to High Court outside Wales

5. Consolidation of cases due to extreme and unusual case of blatant police bullying making previous case law, relied upon by Defence, as totally irrelevant.

6. Machine Gun case, falsified psychiatric reports and other failed 2010 police prosecutions, all for the Defendant to delay ongoing civil actions, should be given to an outside police force for a thorough independent criminal investigation.

•A.     HM Court Service (Wales)

1. HMCS refuse Claimant access to public counter

2. Communicate by e-mails

3. Make telephone calls for clarification

4. Allowed pay court fees by credit card over phone

5. Allowed to have affidavits sworn at court before a Court Order dead line

6. Conspired to prosecute common assault conviction (2^nd Nov 2010), ignoring medical evidence, HMCS not placing evidence before the District Judge

7. Court manager & HM Treasury Solicitor's ‘internal memos', circa 2003, re ‘Vexatious Litigant' registration, revealing miserable but expensive attempts over five years + and losing vital court files to block Claimant's right to the rule of law.

8. HMCS refuses to disclose information to the Claimant in the trial and conviction, in Claimant's absence, now before Welsh Administrative Court. Immediate withdrawal of bail restrictions and arrest order when part release took place in May 2011.....utter abuse of process and criminal conduct.

9. Deliberate withholding of ex MP's obtained independent medical report for 2^nd Dec 2009 hearing, castigating Dr Williams on intrusive dangerous POW unnecessary brain scan and giving false evidence for 10 Cardiff Crown Court judges.

•B.      Criminal Conduct of SWP solicitors, Dolmans of Cardiff.

1. False Feb 09 Chief Superintendant sworn affidavit despite Dolmans having been supplied with 50 odd Claimant lever arch files identifying the court cases and police break-in to his veterinary surgery with Barbara Wilding denying knowledge thereof .

2. 22^nd July 2009 Dolmans had Claimant jailed and ignored trial judge 2010 Court Order to disclose details of complaint that had to his arrest and jail, designed to delay civil trials.

3. Dolmans fully aware Dr Tegwyn Williams' false psychiatric reports concocted by police for Claimant's incarceration in Broadmoor for life.

[‘Significant brain damage', brain tumour and evidence on 2^nd December 2009]

4. Claimant receives Estimated Defendant's £800,000 legal costs

5. Refuse mediation for the cash or from tax payer quoting trial judge's view!

•C.      Trial Judge

1. Claimant refused to prosecute several incidents because convicted despite being unrelated to his proposed prosecution or after specific bullying.

Eg.   a. Overhead video catching Claimant being beaten up by police

         b. Breach of the Peace allegation withdrawn due to forged police papers, countless court irregularities and CPS perjury before Recorder of Cardiff.

         c. Roundabout incident and motoring conviction irrelevant to "We will get the ***" said by police and overhead heard by veterinary nurse planted in back of court due to Claimant's absence. All refused incidents now subject to appeal, in Wales, having been refused an English court.

2. Refuses to consolidate.....4^th, 5^th damages cases and 'machine gun' case whilst defence application is to put off the latter, effectively, for 5 years.

3. MAPPA minutes disclosure so far refused identifying more in the conspiracy, sat around eight tables, to have Claimant either shot or jailed, IPP, for life.

ie 8^th June 09 Barry police station MAPPA meeting, no one ever told the Claimant and 1st June 09 IAG meeting at police HQ, 3 weeks before arrest registered in level 3 MAPPA, top 5% most dangerous , with the hpe of getting him shot (see leaked MAPPA memos). 17^th Dec 09 Claimant's name removed from MAPPA surveillance, again, without explanation or knowledge of Claimant until too late to inform judge for bail.

•D.     Machine Gun Trial

South Wales Police arranged with CAA for four other identical ‘guns', on replica WW1 aircraft or museums to be taken by owners to gunsmiths! In Claimant's case the Welsh police travelled with it, often alone, 2000 miles, contrary to HO gun Regulations, touring the UK desperate to frame the Claimant for mandatory ten year prison sentance.

English police washed their hands if it refusing to arrest either new owner or previous owner of Lewis machine gun so Welsh police called them as prosecution witnesses after attempting to modifying the ‘gun' more, for trial, police knowing the new owner had , himself, modified it, contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

Machine gun trial heard no evidence of Claimant's ‘permanent brain damage/brain tumour' with the trial judge pretending he knew nothing of it.

Claimant refused repeated bent legal representation, sent into prison, gave no evidence, called no witnesses , refused judge's demand for defence statement, refused to sum up , jury making up its mind on the very first day of evidence stating, to the Claimant's friends and relations in a Cardiff restaurant immediately after the shambolic trial, "all the police were lying".

NHS, Williams, Prof Wood, HM prison (Nov 2010 £50,000 judgment awarded to Claimant, by trial judge against HM Prison Cardiff is still live. Retired HM Governor ignored thi judge's Order for ‘Governor at the time' statement for any disclosure of audit trail or did HMCS block serving of the summons for false imprisonment in the first place? It stinks, doesn't it?

•E.      Police/NHS/Dr Tegwyn Williams/ Professor Wood/ HM Prison Conduct

Claimant' forced prolonged illness was a deliberate tactic by most of above Defendants to prejudice his civil litigation.

After Claimant's release from prison, on 9^th Feb 2010, NHS refused to carry out a brain scan or operation, Welsh GP practices refused Claimant as a patient and only by going to France did he obtain a brain scan and urgently overdue hip replacement, in March 2011, to get him off powerful analgesics and other mind hallucinating drugs for acute pain.

Human Rights abuse was rife, but who, in Wales, is counting?

Summary

Another typical example of antiquated adversarial UK legal system, contrary to European methods of obtaining the truth, propagated in Cardiff, this time, for their HM Partnership ‘gravy train' to prolong proceedings for as long as possible using, yet again, the tried and tested method of ‘Treacle Treatment', to Delay.

7. By this court, not consolidating cases, not transferring to the High Court, out of Wales and for independent police force not examining Claimant's private prosecution evidence served, again, this week at Cardiff Central police station and currently before an English criminal court, this trial judge is at serious risk of abuse of process, blocking mediation and settlement out of court, many knowing a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice within the Welsh judiciary is proved.

8. The Defendants are relying on the usual ‘treacle treatment', for a Claimant against the State, to either ‘run out of money', ‘run out of steam' or, simply, ‘die'.

Voltaire wrote, something like, ‘When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right'.

The Claimant believes, there is only one truth, no matter which litigant has control of it.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

St Doha

Brittany.

.

Machine Gun Case and MAPPA Disclosure 11th July 2pm at Cardiff County Court

Maurice — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:18:00 GMT

Roll up, roll up, see corruption in the raw!

While I was outside the Cardiff court yesterday, demonstrating with megaphone and posters, a relation of one of the machine gun jury, in January 2009, came up and said she was appalled at Judge Paul Thomas QC's conduct, he stating she believed it had been, "chaotic and bloody shambolic". I told him, knowing the taffia's real reason behind the trial, I could have been a mass murderer and I would still have got off!

Yesterday's e-mails from both Adrian Oliver, for machine gun case damages and Morgan Cole , for Dr Tegwyn Wiliams and Professor Wood false medical reports damages, both indicated frantic activity within the South Wales Police, to put both cases into the 'long grass'.

One or two more Welsh judges will oblige them, no doubt, to keep the truth from the general public

WANTED

Judge Paul Thomas QC

As Cardiff trial judge he refused me - my medication, my documents in cell below, bail, relevant witnesses, the right to cross examine relevant issues, the right to interview my own witnesses, to stop a hopeless trial, disclosure of the police fabricated conspiracy with MAPPA/FTAC, seeking IPP, that I was dangerous and in ‘possession of a WW1 decommissioned Lewis machine gun with live ammunition.

Jury decided verdict after first day of evidence

He refused the huge costs incurred

Evilness Personified

Published by Maurice Kirk www.kirkflyingvet.com

(Content of many WANTED posters to be dropped over Cardiff from a great height)

It stinks, does'nt it?

Come Witness More Corruption on the 11th July 2pm at Cardiff County Court

The conspiracy to having me shot or locked away for life, IPP, by the Defendant in this Monday's case, all surfaces in their very own made cesspit of evilness, known as a Cardiff court, changed, at 2pm.

Maurice pays for lunch and and sticky buns, in the intervals when the fire curtain comes down. That's if you can bear the stench, in the auditorium, in this local theatre of entertainment known as the Cardiff Justice Centre. 2pm

See video (in blog post below) of UK Law Lords scurrying out of court, last week, knowing these issues, to be raised on Monday, were, at last, before them, the method, to get it out of Wales, having been somewhat un-orthodox.

A general statement on behalf of "We the people..." who believe our government and law courts have undermined basic human rights and pledge to fulfil the promise of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is here.

MONDAY AGENDA

On Monday at 2pm police apply to court to put off my current machine gun one million pound claim until outcome of my 19 year running damages claim of police bullying ie 2years.

Also, today, my seperate claim against NHS, Dr Williams and Prof Wood falsified medical reports to get me to Ashworth High Security Prison has recieved in court an application by Defendants to stay also!.

Bearing in mind my private prosecutions in Cardiff mag are now subject to 'state a case' back at DJ Martin Brown and Bristol magistrates advise are back before judge Nicholas Cooke QC ,who you may remember,on 1st Oct 2009 throuout norman and myself, refusing me bail lying to you that the psychiatric report was correct..

Also 6 hours with police this week, repeating all complaints I generated when that evil Caswell Clinic, in 2009, run by Williams to fill his private clinics.

On Monday the trial judge is forced to make decision on whether I get MAPPA minutes of June 09 to Dec 09, not subject to PII, which reveals more of the conspiracy to get me to prison for life,unconvicted.

You shoukd be able to precict his behavioour after his last one which included I could not sue police3 for beating me up caught on over head camera (see videos).

There is much more I am not prepared to reveal just now

Application to a magistrates' court to state a case 5th July 2011

64.1.-(1) An application under section 111(1) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980(a) shall be made in writing and signed by or on behalf of the applicant and shall identify the question or questions of law or jurisdiction on which the opinion of the High Court is sought.

(2) Where one of the questions on which the opinion of the High Court is sought is whether there was evidence on which the magistrates' court could come to its decision, the particular finding of fact made by the magistrates' court which it is claimed cannot be supported by the evidence before the magistrates' court shall be specified in such application.

(3) Any such application shall be sent to a court officer for the magistrates' court whose decision is questioned.

Cardiff Magistrates
Cardiff
South Wales

5^th July 2011

Laying of Information against Adrian Oliver, Barbara Wilding and Dr Tegwyn Williams

An application under section 111(1) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980(a) is made to state a case before the High Court on the premise that Adrian Oliver drafted an affidavit for the County Court, having stated to the Cardiff County Court had full disclosure knowing the affidavit to be false for Barbara Wilding to sign it.

Further, for Barbara Wilding to have ignored the November 2008 Court Order, immediately handing in her notice as Chief Constable and then signing the 25^th February 2009 affidavit, knowing it to be false, was also a criminal offence.

To then employ medical staff, on or before 8^th June 2009, from her South Wales Police forensic unit, Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, informing them Maurice Kirk was likely to be shot but deliberately delaying his arrest was a criminal offence.

Once detained in custody, on the 22^nd July 2009 for police using Adrian Oliver to lay complaint, knowing it to be false, was a criminal offence.

The magistrate knew or should have known all three of the accused were all implicated if not fully aware, in over 130 criminal allegations brought by the South Wales Police of which as few as 12 had been found proven in local Welsh courts, was part of promised immunity to prosecution in the Principality, purely for profit.

The HM Court Service (Wales) and Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) were equally well informed, in that 29^th June 2011 magistrates court hearing with prima facie evidence of an apparent conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by all three accused and should or did inform the district judge accordingly.

Dr Tegwyn Williams was employed by police to falsify his first psychiatric report to MAPPA and IAG, on the 1^st June 2009, following Maurice Kirk's applications to the Royal Courts of Justice and elsewhere, in England, for an independent police investigation.

The magistrate had access to all this above information and documents already before him, with both the CPS, and HMCS in attendance together with Adrian Oliver, also an officer of the court, all bound, by oath, not to knowingly allow an ‘abuse of process' to be obtained in any England and Wales court of law.

For the magistrate to deliberately state the findings of Dr Tegwyn Williams, ‘significant brain damage', ‘paranoid delusional disorder' [belief Maurice Kirk believed police were bullying him] and ‘having a possible brain tumour' was, in itself, an abuse and a criminal offence.

Dr Tegwyn Williams neither had the qualifications nor the knowledge and when in possession of contrary evidence by experts, to have knowingly falsified numerous, some yet undisclosed, despite court order, psychiatric reports, to have Maurice Kirk sectioned to Ashworth high security prison for life, was a criminal offence.

Williams was aware such an attempt would prejudice Maurice Kirk's 19 year running civil damages claim against the police and nearly 8 months imprisonment, that Maurice Kirk was in possession of a machine gun, had been fabricated by Barbara Wilding for her own private purposes.

6 hours, today, with Cardiff police and visiting Cardiff Crown court, upon the advice of and English court, in Bristol, was a joke. HHJ Cooke QC repeating his arrogant deceit by refusing disclosure of my own medical records, he personally had ordered to get him sectioned, will again go before the Criminal Court of Appeal, London and will again be videoed for internet coverage to expose South Wales deceit riddled judiciary driven by avarice.

For police, today, to suggest Maurice Kirk report his complaint of ‘attempted murder' to IPCC is an insult to his intelligence, since they know he had already been there, countless times, bought the T-shirt and seen the movie.

Police, today, refused to investigate my complaints or refer them to the CPS but, instead, referred the documents to the South Wales Police HQ, Bridgend.

Gloucestershire police have already refused to investigate sending all the evidence to the villains.

Maurice Kirk makes application to pay £20,000 or whatever sum of money it takes, to a police officer, for the release of records relating only to him, created by IAG, MAPPA, Caswell Clinic, HM prison, Cardiff, Cardiff courts and Dr Tegwyn Williams thereby unable to be withheld, any longer, on the legal argument of Public Interest Immunity to be attempted in another thoroughly corrupt welsh environment, Cardiff County Court, on 11^th and 12^th July, before HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC.

All invited, lunch on Maurice Kirk, as usual.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Enclosed criminal charges before 28^th June 2011 Cardiff Magistrates Court

Criminal Charges

Barbara Wilding, ex-Chief Constable of the South Wales Constabulary

On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Adrian Oliver and other persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009, for His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, knowing it to be false, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On a day between 1^st June 2009 and 25^th June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown and by laying false information before Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) meetings, you attempted to murder Maurice John Kirk knowing it to be unlawful and contrary to Criminal Attempts Act 1981.1.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Chalice, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of a prohibited weapon, one WWI Lewis machine gun, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of ammunition, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On or about 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Orchid, you did harass Maurice John Kirk and/or Kirstie Louse Kirk and her daughter, indicating social services may remove Genevieve Kirk from the family unit when knowing the reasons to be false and contrary to section 2 of the Harassment Act 1997.

Adrian Oliver of Dolmans, solicitors, Windsor Place, Cardiff

1. On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Barbara Wilding and other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009,following the Order of His Honour Nicholas Chambers QC,knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

2. On a day between 19^th and 20^th June 2009 in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the laying of information, namely, threat to cause criminal damage,knowing it to be false and causing Maurice John Kirk to be arrested, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police Forensic Psychiatric Unit, Bridgend, South Wales

1. On a day between 8^th June and 17^th December 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of psychiatric reports of Maurice John Kirk knowing them to be false and written without the necessary qualifications, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

2. On 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court in the Vale of Glamorgan South Wales, with Richard Thomlow, Crown Prosecution barrister, did conspireto pervert the course of justice by the laying of information before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, knowing it to be false, namely, that Maurice John Kirk had significant brain damage and a possible brain tumour and recommending he be sentto ahigh security psychiatric hospital for an indeterminate period.

Magna Carta Day,15th June, Public Demonstation, Leeds County Court -- 'Right to Private Prosecutions' Meeting 12 Noon

Maurice — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:08:00 GMT

Adrian Oliver of Dolmans Solicitors has been the Solicitor of South Wales Police and is the MasterMind behind "defending" all bullying incidents, the cumulative harassment and the multi-organisational collusion under the label MAPPA.

See 'HM Conspiratorial Partnership' in Cardiff magistes courts as an example of blocking Private Prosecutions here:this document.

"Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power, be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law must provide a speedy remedy. Otherwise the victims will find their own remedy. There will be anarchy."

Lord Denning: 1982

WANTED

(Picture on gallery or Downloads)

Following posters, shortly,on gallery

Judge T M Hughes QC

Judge Morris

Judge Vosper

Judge Llewellyn Jones

Judge Elleri Rees

Judge Gareth Jones

Judge Neil Bidder QC

More Cardiff Judges to come

IN THE CARDIFF COURT

Maurice Kirk Appellant

Chief Constable of South Wales Police Respondent

Particulars of Claim

1. The Defendant is and was at all material times the chief officer of the South Wales Constabulary and the police officers hereinafter referred to were at all material times acting under the direction and control of the Defendant in the performance or purported performance of their functions. 2. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft.

3. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 aeroplane and ‘gun' from a private collection with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' as an integral part of the fuselage.

4. 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This became the critical argument in the trial.

5. 2000: The DH2 with the same Lewis antique was flown by the Claimant at the Farnborough Air Show by invitation of Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame.

6. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' dismounted.

7. 2007: The DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out, by the RAF, to a civilian for further repair in Hampshire.

8. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and gun to another display pilot who modified the gun for his own purposes.

9. On 25^th February 2009 the Defendant signed a sworn affidavit knowing it to be or ought to have known it to be, false in that paragraphs, between14 to 21, contained erroneous information, namely, incidents, involving both the Defendant and Claimant, had occurred

10. Following the 2008 Court Order by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, for the Defendant to sign an affidavit that full disclosure of evidence, under her control, had been disclosed to the Claimant, the latter entered the Defendants solicitors offices, on or about the 25^th February 2009 complaining the court order had not been carried out.

11. The Claimant, upon receipt of a copy of the Defendant’s affidavit entered Barry Police Station and was both videoed and interviewed at length following his complaint that the Chief Constable had knowingly signed a false affidavit to avoid disclosure of evidence relevant to the nineteen year running civil action for damages, CF101741 + three others..

12. On 1^st June 2009 the Defendant caused the Claimant to be subjected to Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) enquiry following a meeting, at the South Wales Police Head Quarters, Bridgend, by the Independent Advisory Group.

13. On 8^th June 2009, at Barry police station MAPPA meeting, police informed the agencies that the Claimant was to be arrested and taken into custody for being in possession of a prohibited weapon.

14. The police also informed the agencies that should the Claimant approach the Chief Constable then he was likely to be shot.

15. On 15^th June 2009 the Claimant brought further civil proceedings, in the Administrative Court, London, against the Defendant when police were called to be in attendance.

16. On 18^th June 2009 the Claimant again laid the complaint, this time at the offices of the Defendant in her Bridgend head quarters .and again, refused mutual exchange of witness statements.

17. On 19^th June 2009 the Defendant again refused to exchange witness statements when her solicitors were contacted by the Claimant despite the court order having given until 4pm.

18. On 20^th June 2009 the Defendant’s solicitors laid complaint against the Claimant to be arrested for threat of criminal damage.

19. On 21^st June 2009 police Operations, ‘Orchid’ and ‘Chalice, caused’ a sizeable force of police officers to surround the Claimant’s home, in St Donats, Vale of Glamorgan, requiring an armed response unit, a police helicopter and both forensic psychiatrists and a lay advisor for the Claimant to be in attendance. The operation was aborted once the Claimant was seen drinking tea with his family in their front garden.

20. The English police refused to ‘touch it with a barge pole, once they became aware that the Welsh police had persuaded the Civil Aviation Authority to telephone the new owner, in England, to dismount the Lewis antique and alone drive it across Lincolnshire and beyond to find a licenced arms dealer where it would be collected by the Defendant.

21. The Welsh police then hawked the Lewis antique nearly two thousand miles around the UK, contrary to Home Office Regulations during which time had it modified, to be illegal, contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act at their special laboratory in South Wales.

22. On 22^nd June 2009 police returned to the Claimant’s home and arrested him in the road outside his property, cautioning him that he had been arrested for: a. Threat of committing criminal damageb. Being in possession of a prohibited weapon c. Being in possession of prohibited ammunition.

23. The Claimant was never charged with the first arrest allegation and despite court orders from His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC to reveal the evidence and statements by Dolmans, solicitors, falsified to assist their client, the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Ms Barbara Wilding.

24. Between 22^nd and 23^rd June 2009 the police removed the Claimant’s lawfully held shot guns, ammunition and court files relating to the Claimant’s ongoing Claims of bullying, harassment and false imprisonment none of which have been returned to the Claimant.

25. On 24^th June 2009 a police officer or officers laid an information against the Claimant at Barry Magistrates court alleging that that the Claimant had been in possession of a prohibited weapon, one 1916 Lewis machine gun and had sold the gun, both contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

26. Upon reading the Claimant’s June 2009 64 page Defense statement the Barry Magistrates court, following legal advice, allowed the Claimant unconditional bail.

27. On 25^th June 2009 the police appealed the court order lying to HHJ Hughes causing the Claimant to be detained in custody in Cardiff prison.

28. Lies by the Defendant were used, eventually, before ten Cardiff Crown Court judges, no less, refusing the Claimant disclosure of evidence, under their control, that would have cleared the Claimant’s name.

29. In July 2009 the Defendant brought a third indictment namely, ‘income from crime’.

30. On 3^rd August 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams, forensic psychiatrist and Director of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police forensic Unit, at Bridgend signed a psychiatric report recommending the Claimant be sectioned and further remanded to his medium secure psychiatric unit, Caswell Clinic, under Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act.

31. In September 2009 when it was clear the Claimant was not going to employ a lawyer sworn to the Welsh courts Dr Tegwyn Williams recommended that the Claimant be transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, IPP, imprisonment for Public Protection.

32. On or about the 24^th October 2009 the Claimant was further remanded in custody in Cardiff Prison reliant on a further Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric report the Defendant knew or ought to have known was false.

33. On 9^th February 2010, at Cardiff Crown Court, the Defendant having earlier withdrawn the third indictment, was found not guilty on all remaining indictments and was released from custody.

34. No defence evidence or summing up was needed from the Claimant with further confirmation by nine members of the jury confirming to him that their decision of ‘Not Guilty’ was already concluded by eleven of the jury after the first day of evidence was given and cross examined.

35. The jury also made the Claimant aware, immediately after the hearing, that they questioned why both the original seller to the Claimant, of the Lewis antique and the current owner were not both also in the dock as defendants.

36. The Claimant’s complaints to the relevant police authorities, to investigate the conduct within South Wales Police before and after his arrest and nearly eight months in custody, have been swept aside in a perfunctory manner to which the Claimant is accustomed since first settling in south Wales in 1992.

37. The arrest and detention of the Claimant were unlawful.

38. There were no reasonable grounds to believe that the Claimant was probably guiltv of the offence for which he was arrested. 39. The decisions to arrest and detain the Claimant were such as no reasonable police officer would have reached.

40. The Claimant was detained for longer than was reasonably necessary and in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

41. Further, the actions of police officers set out above constitute harassment within meaning of section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and misfeasance in public office.

42. Unless restrained by the Court police officers will continue to harass the Claimant.
43. By reason of the matters aforesaid, the Claimant has suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety, damage to his reputation and was deprived of his liberty. He has been subjected to bullying, malicious prosecution and harassment, false imprisonment and contrary to the 1998 Human Rights Act.

44. The Plaintiff therefore claims of the Defendant:- Damages Exemplary damages Special Damages. Costs. In pursuant of Sections of the County Court Act 1984.

45. The Claimant retains his right for a lawyer to amend this Claim.

Dr Tegwyn Williams, Prof Roger Wood and South Wales NHS sued for a Million Pound + Fraud

Maurice — Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:05:00 GMT

Dear Sir Norman Scarth, Rear Admiral Rtd.,

Further to your kind invitation to attend Leeds County Court on Magna Carta Day, 15th June, [NOT BEFORE NOON], with Battle Bus, megaphones, etc [details at bottom of this post] please consider 10,000 pamphlets, floating downwards, on the day, just for starters.

More than a year has gone by since I was incarcerated in prison due to a rogue psychiatrist falsifying medical records just to help a police woman in a spot of bother. "trouble at mill", as my Barry Veterinary hospital secretary used to say, back in the 90s.

Barbara Wilding, as Chief Constable and controller of millions of charity cash, enquiry will find, had a 'cosy relationship' with Tegwyn, a NHS Clinical Director needing handouts, fast and plentiful.

Whilst I was locked up in the shear hell of Casswell Clinic, I noticed other patients being quietly recommended release, by Williams, alone, to one of his own private psychiatric units, in Cardiff and elsewhere, cleverly in partnership with other key NHS people controlling the flow of UK tax payers' money to the private medical sector.I have deliberately kept quiet, until now, Norman, on this aspect of the 2008 conspiracy hatched, machine gun arrest / Barbara as Defendant / Williams to falsify records, just to see what wicked Tegwyn Williams / South Wales Police and HM Partnership and their cabal might do next, now that I am temporarily at large and still breathing.

An outside authority should easily follow the audit trail of purloined tax payers' cash, in South Wales, despite having their local courts sewn up 'as tight as a mackerels', as our old gardener, Ernie Gratton, would say.

Is there a link beween the multiple Bridgend suicides of late and Caswell Clinic policy, many are asking?

Neither NHS nor Welsh Assembly have any intention in helping me get my medical records clarified or corrected. So, once again, I have to face the utter stench of a Welsh law court for a few more years. .A Cardiff Court action against Williams came to an interesting conclusion, today, when the Cardiff judge refused my application for clarification, correction or release of my medical records.....

Those proceedings now concluded, but with Williams still not yet behind bars, it has set the stage, beautifully for the start of both civil and criminal proceedings. Norman, guess where? In Cardiff!

IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT Claim No

MAURICE JOHN KIRK Claimant

Dr Tegwyn Williams 1st Defendant

Professor Roger Wood 2^nd Defendant

Paul Williams Chief Executive NHS Wales 3^rd Defendant

The Secretary of State to the Ministry of Justice 4^th Defendant

PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

1. The 1^st Defendant was at all material times the Clinical Director of the South Wales Constabulary's Forensic Unit, Caswell Clinic, Bridgend and the staff of the medium secure psychiatric hospital, hereinafter referred to, were at all material times acting under the direction and control of the Defendant in the performance or purported performance of their functions.

2. The 2^nd Defendant was at all material times a psychology professor at Swansea University, South Wales.

3. The 3^rd Defendant was the regional director responsible for the conduct of the South Wales NHS staff and safety of the general public when in its care.

4. On or before 1^st June 2009,following meetings at South Wales Police HQ, by senior police officers, the 1st Defendant was made aware that ‘Operation Orchid' had been conceived following the attempts by the Claimant to sue the South Wales Police relating to over one hundred incidents and was claiming malicious intent, bullying and false imprisonment by them.

5. His newest complaint, that being the Chief Constable's February 2009 falsely signed sworn affidavit, relating to years of covert police surveillance of the Claimant, led to meetings of the Independent Advisory Group (IAG) and Multi Agency Public Protection arrangements (MAPPA) in order prevent disclosure of the truth.

6. Repeatedly, police refused to properly investigate crime committed against his property and person. Well over one hundred allegations of criminal conduct were laid, as a counter measure, only to be withdrawn by the HM Crown Prosecution Service or ignominiously dismissed in the criminal courts despite where HM Partnership had some special relationships with each other in the Principality.

7. The 1^stand 3^rd Defendant knew that police ‘Operation Orchid' was devised on spurious medical grounds with a real risk of damaging the Claimant by either being a party to causing his 10 year old daughter being taken into care, allegedly for her own safety, by South Wales Social Services.

8. The 1^st Defendant, on 8^th June 2009, caused members of his staff to attend Barry police station for a MAPPA meeting that led to his knowledge that the Claimant was to be arrested, remanded in custody and should the Claimant ‘approach the Chief Constable of South Wales', on the pretext of ‘mutual exchange of witness statements', in a civil action, ‘he was likely to be shot' by an armed police unit.

9. At no time, to this day, did any of the four Defendants inform the Claimant of the risk to his life, from the South Wales Police nor the existence and possible consequences of ‘Operation Orchid' causing damage to both the Claimant and his family.

10. In early and mid June 2009 the Claimant attended various South Wales police stations, in Cardiff, Cowbridge and Barry, lodging further complaints of being refused police investigations concerning crimes committed against him.

11. On 18^th June 2009, in frustration, the Claimant visited and complained at the Chief Constable's office in Bridgend HQ where he was soon surrounded by a heavily armed police sporting flak jackets and tin hats with an array of gas cylinders clipped on their belts.

12. The Chief constable refused ‘exchange of witness statements', despite a court dead line by the following day, and ordered the Claimant be escorted off the premises but not before a thorough search of his car, for any fire arms or explosives and bringing in a road patrol officer off the Motorway who failed to find any defect in the Claimant's old car.

13. The Claimant put the finishing touches to his 64 page witness statement, for court later, having just ‘gone public', on YouTube and on his own web site, http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/, of his knowing, all the time, of the 18 years of expensive covert police surveillance on both his veterinary hospital and home.

14. On 21^st June 2009 the 1^st Defendant was notified of ‘Operation Chalice', arranged by the Chief Constable, for a formidable armed police unit amassed to take the Claimant into custody.

15. The operation was, however, aborted despite the Claimant being in full view of the twenty odd surveillance team, crowded in the road and crouched behind the hedges with police helicopter hovering overhead.

16. On the 22^nd June 2009 the Claimant was arrested on fire arms charges, fabricated by the Chief Constable but examined by a police psychiatrist who found no relevant medical abnormality with her patient to require detention or treatment.

17. To the contrary, the 1^st Defendant wrote his 3^rd August 2009 psychiatric report , without even examining the Claimant, recommending the Claimant serve a further prison sentence, whilst unconvicted but in his experimental unit, Caswell Clinic, thereby further delaying the machine gun allegations coming to trial

18. The 1^st Defendant wrongly stated his patient suffered a ‘paranoid delusional disorder', requiring further detention in custody, due to ‘false fixed beliefs' in that the Claimant believed he was being persecuted by the South Wales Police

19. On 7^th August 2009, upon giving a Cardiff Crown Court judge false information, the 1^st Defendant recommended and obtained a Section 35 under the 1983 Mental Health Act.

20. The 1^st Defendant knew or should have known that an appropriately qualified police doctor, HM Prison Cardiff psychiatrists and his own doctors, at Caswell Clinic had already very recently physically examined the Claimant and had found no mental health abnormality requiring further incarceration or treatment

21. The 1^stDefendant, on or about 28^th August 2009, maliciously and/or negligently, caused the Claimant to undergo an unnecessary but intrusive procedure of a SPEC scan requiring the infusion of radioactive isotopes into the Claimant's brain.

22. The 1st Defendant informed the South Wales Police, HM Crown Prosecution Service, Uncle Tom Cobley and all that Princess of Wales Hospital brain scans revealed ‘significant brain damage' and likely to be irreversible..

23. The 1^st Defendant had no appropriate medical qualifications to come to that conclusion especially with the prior knowledge that an expert in the field of brain scans had already written a report stating there was no sign of relevant abnormality or suggestion of any space invading lesion in the Claimant's brain.

24. Following significant but immediate alarming sides effects on the ‘patient' the 1^st Defendant repeatedly refused the right for the Claimant to be examined, either privately funded or funded by the 3^rd Defendant, by his own general practitioner of some seventeen years standing or independent source from outside South Wales.

25. The Claimant has suffered these apparent medical complications ever since.

26. The 1st Defendant caused the 2^ndDefendant to be also enticed into the conspiracy, to pervert the course of justice, hatched originally by senior police officers of South Wales in the hope of a few chances in having the chronic litigant ‘lawfully' shot.

27. Professor Wood, the 2^nd Defendant, interviewed the Claimant under the pretence he was a doctor of medicine and when he had no appropriate qualifications to write such content in his original report to Dr Ruth Bagshaw of Caswell Clinic.

28. The 2nd Defendant's report, read by the Claimant on or around 13^th October 2009, stated apart from other untruths, the following:

a. He was an expert in the field of interpreting brain scans and the very purpose of his being called in by the 1^st Defendant. He agreed with the doctor's findings, that of irreversible ‘significant brain damage'.

b. Damage was attributed to the effects of excessive alcohol consumption having been an old drinking partner of the late actor, Oliver Reed Esq.

c. Damage was attributed to the effects of ‘previous flying accidents' and the Claimant's recently ditching into the Caribbean in his WW2 light aircraft during an attempted circum navigation of the world.

d. Damage confirmed by the 2^nd Defendant's belief that the Claimant had flown his aircraft from West Wales to Australia ‘without a map'.

29. 1^st Defendant caused further psychiatric reports to be written containing the following:

Maurice Kirk presents with symptoms entirely consistent with a mental illness namely

paranoid delusional disorder (fixed false beliefs un ameanable to reason)

Maurice Kirk has evidence of significant brain damage to an area of his brain specifically

related to self-awareness, judgement, decision making, self regulation of behaviour and

control of emotions

30. More 1^st Defendant psychiatric reports caused the Claimant to be further detained in custody, in fear of his life throughout, for the maximum period allowed, under the 1983 law, that of twelve weeks.

31. The 1^st Defendant, despite repeated objections by the Claimant each time a new report was written, refused to correct his forensic history of his patient. It included, along with other false information to countless bail judges, that the Claimant, in 1982, had been convicted of ‘Actual Bodily Harm'

32. Following the Claimant's applications under the Freedom of Information and Data Protection Acts, the 3^rd Defendant, the NHS, refused to disclose the full relevant medical records caused by the Claimant's detention in Caswell Clinic and in particular including any records of 2^nd Defendant or from those of the doctor in his presence at time of his insulting interview.

33. The 1^st Defendant then recommended, under a Section 41 or similar, to numerous judges that the Claimant be retained in a psychiatric hospital. He particularly asked his patient be transferred to Ashworth high security psychiatric prison, following consultation with the South Wales Police and MAPPA recommending he be imprisoned IPP, imprisonment for public protection and without access to a jury, for an indeterminate period.

34. On the Claimant being returned to HM Prison Cardiff, in late October 2009, the 1^st Defendant was now in possession of other doctor's opinions, exceeding eighteen, that the Claimant revealed no relevant mental disorder to have caused his detention in his Caswell Clinic or for any treatment other than obtain independent legal representation, significantly unavailable in South Wales.

35. On 2nd December 2009, before the prospective trial judge in the rapidly approaching criminal proceedings, with the Claimant now indicted on ‘being in possession of a machine gun', ‘selling it' and ‘making financial gain', the 1st Defendant caused some of those present, without ever informing the Claimant, to this day, that the latter now had a brain tumour and was far too dangerous to be released on bail.

36. These further serious attempts to pervert the course of justice, by HM Crown Prosecution Service, the Chief Constable of South Wales Police and Dr Tegwyn Williams, were MAPPA's last ditch attempt to avoid a farcical and publicly watched criminal trial in the capital of Wales.

37. During the 2^nd December 2009 Crown Court hearing, in the absence of the unrepresented Claimant, locked up below, two English independent medical reports were considered by the court. The 1st, from HM Prison Ashworth, found no apparent mental disorder while the 2^nd, likewise, from a leading specialist in nuclear medicine, went so far as to castigating the 1^st Defendant for the unnecessary use of a SPEC scan when a non intrusive scan was all that was needed. The Claimant was again refused bail.

38. On or about 17^th December 2009 MAPPA, conducted in Caswell Clinic would you believe, removed the Claimant from their top level 5% category 3 list of most dangerous persons to the general public.

39. MAPPA or their agents, including 1^st, 3^rd and 4^th Defendant have failed to notify the Claimant, to this day, as to when and why was he on MAPPA register at all?

40. Why, now, he was no longer considered a public threat just days before a trail carrying possible convictions with a mandatory ten year prison sentence?

41. On 9^th February 2010 the Claimant was cleared of all charges, despite offering no defense BUT only due to the timely intervention of a jury made up of no lawyers and only one police ‘plant'.

42. Upon release from prison all four Defendants caused the Cowbridge Health Centre to refuse the Claimant as a continuing patient or disclose what confidential medical information of their patient it had revealed to FTAC, MAPPA or any of the Defendants before or during his custody period.

43. On 10^th February 2010, in Bridgend police station, a police psychiatrist and social workers examined the Claimant, yet again, in relation to ‘Operation

Orchid', still ongoing and again, found no relevant mental disorder to warrant the custody or medical treatment of the Claimant or being continued refusal to get access to his own daughter.

44 The 3^rd Defendant refused to disclose the full medical records, yet again, under a repeated Claimant Application, under the aforesaid Acts but included, by mistake a back dated falsified copy, again signed by the 2^nd Defendant, as if to be a copy of the original one seen by the Claimant handed to him, during his custody, by a Caswell Clinic doctor to read.

45. Only when the good doctor perceived the Claimant was likely to assault him, if need be, did he hand over the erroneous document to read

46. This report was clearly designed, as with the 1^st Defendant's psychiatric reports, to injure the Claimant's reputation and good name in the Vale of Glamorgan where he had, for many years, successfully practiced veterinary medicine.

47. Continued refusal by all four Defendants, to clarify and correct the Claimant's medical records, caused the Civil Aviation Authority to refuse his renewal for his pilot's licences until further examined by two of their most senior psychiatrists.

48. The Claimant had to travel to the CAA at Gatwick airport to find two doctors who stated, in so many words, that there was no indication of any medical condition that prevented the Claimant from holding a permit to be allowed to lawfully ‘break the bonds of earth' in UK airspace.

49. In June 2009 surgeons refused to operate on the Claimant, for an urgently needed total hip replacement, due to confusion caused by the all four Defendants, refusing to clarify whether or not the Claimant had cancer and ‘significant brain damage'.

50. The 3^rd Defendant refused to carry out another brain scan, via his new GP in Barry, causing serious delay with the Claimant having to travel to a foreign country for one. Only then did the Claimant obtain his much overdue operation, in Brittany once no abnormality was found in the Claimant's brain.

51. In or around July 2010 the 4^th Defendant refused to disclose Claimant's medical records relevant in these Particulars of Claim and denied knowledge, despite attending, of MAPPA monthly meetings during the 2009 Claimant's custody.

52. The 4^th Defendant would not even allow the Claimant to have his walking sticks returned suggesting malicious intent and part of the conspiracy.

53. All four Defendants caused unnecessary pain and suffering and mental anguish with the seriously debilitating effect of prolonged mind enhancing drugs such as morphine sulphate and Tremadol for nearly ten months.

54. The Claimant's medication and severe pain caused complete havoc and huge expense to the Claimant for numerous court proceedings, both civil and criminal, since June 2010 to around eight weeks after his 25^th March 2011 operation, a period for recuperation.

55. Parties in both civil and criminal courts, between June 2010 to date, have taken unfair advantage of the Claimant either ignoring countless monthly medical updates from specialist doctors from both sides of the English Channel.

56. One Cardiff law firm, defending a client for monies owed, actually quoted from the 1^st Defendant's false information contained in his psychiatric reports pleading the Claimant was, in effect, insane.

57. The 4^th Defendant also caused about a week's false imprisonment, in or about January 2008, when refusing to take from his prisoner, from within prison, his cash, his cheque, supply a credit card machine, to draw the cash or take from his wife, dutifully waiting at the prison gate, the outstanding amount in ‘readies'.

58. The Barry magistrates had promised the Claimant he could pay the outstanding CPS costs and court costs at any time during prison custody. The remaining amount from the original £11,000 owed being around £3,500, in lieu of imprisonment.

59. In summary, the Claimant has suffered from all four Defendants' misfeasance in public office and failure of duty of care to their patient and/or prisoner needing the latter to obtain protection from this abuse by temporary asylum in France, now subject to appeal and shortly to be heard, in open court, in Paris.

60. And in particular, the failure by the 1^st Defendant to correct and clarify the Claimant's medical records is gross professional misconduct which has caused defamation of the Claimant's name and good character, falsification of medical documents, false imprisonment, serious prolonged unnecessary bullying, pain and mental suffering to cause damages, special damages and/or exemplary damages with punitive damages, his conduct needing a long overdue criminal investigation.

61. And in particular, the 2nd Defendant's negligence has caused defamation of the Claimant's name and good character by falsified medical records causing false imprisonment and unnecessary pain and mental suffering requiring damages, exemplary and/special damages with punitive damages, his conduct also needing a long overdue criminal investigation.

62. And in particular, the 3^rd Defendant has caused defamation of the Claimant's name and good character, continues to withhold proper NHS services from the Claimant and relevant medical records that has led to unnecessary pain and mental suffering for the Claimant requiring this claim for damages, exemplary and/or special damages

63. And in particular, the 4^th Defendant has caused negligence, unnecessary pain and mental suffering and false imprisonment requiring damages, exemplary and/special damages.

64. And the Claimant claims costs.

Unless restrained by a competent court this rogue psychologist and rogue psychiatrist are likely to repeat their action again, there currently being little or no proper outside independent supervision of what really goes on in the Principality.

The Claimant retains his right for trial by jury and for a lawyer to read and amend this Claim.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

2^nd June 2011

Puits aux Papillons
St Doha
22230 Merdrignac
Brittany

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Copy to: Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, Royal Courts of Justice

Cardiff Court of Appeal

Cardiff County Court

The French Immigration Authorities

My Judicial Review Application (Case CO/601/2011, The Queen (on the application of Norman Scarth), versus Leeds Magistrates' Court & others.) is to be heard in Leeds Combined Court Centre on Wednesday 15th June 2011, listed as 'NOT BEFORE 12 NOON'.

Please forgive my 'delusions of grandeur', but I do believe it warrants an attendance comparable to Birkenhead on 7th March.
Directions. The Courthouse (LS1 3BG) is just off Westgate, which is a continuation of The Headrow. It is the plain red brick building close by the Town Hall (a large imposing building with a massive domed tower). A free bus runs from Leeds Railway station. Get off at the Town Hall.
You know my belief that one way we may break the stranglehold which the Legal Mafia has on 'The Law' (& return something pertaining to 'Justice' to Britain) is to use Private Prosecutions. That they use all their dirty tricks to block us shows that they realise this. This Application for Judicial Review is my attempt to overcome their blocking tactics & break that stranglehold. As indicated below, 30 minutes SHOULD be enough for the judge to grant 'Permission to make the Application' (which is the convoluted way they do things), but the presence of numbers such as at Birkenhead on 7th March could ensure s/he does so. I understand the judge is likely to be HH Judge Mark Gosnell who lives at Newchurch in the Rossendale Valley in Lancashire. Surprisingly (to me) he is a guitarist in a rock band & is 'a stalwart of evening gigs at the Jolly Sailor, Spring Terrace, White Lion & other ritzy Valley venues with his band WASTED'. You younger people must tell me if this means he is more likely to obey his Judicial Oath? See below for my comments about a Circuit Judge being put in a position to overrule a High Court Judge.
Please ring me on 01274 541 213 if you wish. (see lower down for my contention that this matter being in the High Court at all is extortion of money from the public to go into the pockets of the legal professionals.)
Norman Scarth.

To Sergeant Mrs. Kate Roberts.
Dear Mrs. Roberts,
Yes please, in spite of the fact I would do better to complain to Father Christmas, Elvis Presley or Lord Lucan, I DO ask that you treat this as an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT (much good it will do me!) See my comments, inserted below in red, for easy recognition.
N.Scarth.
- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Subject: Complaint Against Police PSD 11/ - [Restricted]
> To: enscarth@hotmail.com
> From: Kate.Roberts@merseyside.police.uk
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:55:33 +0100
>
> Dear Mr. Scarth,
> A complaint against police has been recorded as you wrote to the Wirral
> Magistrates and raised your concerns regarding the way in which you were
> treated by both court staff and members of Merseyside Police. Your e-mail
> was forwarded to Merseyside Police. As a result of the allegations made in
> your e-mail, a complaint against police has been recorded.
>
> If you wish to withdraw this complaint, please let me know.
>
> However if you would like me to look into how you were dealt with by
> Merseyside Police officers on the date you state you were refused entry to
> Wirral Magistrates, I will do so.
'Refused entry'? That is a eupheism if ever there was one! I was NOT 'refused entry', but had barely got through the door before I was dragged off by ignorant thugs in uniform who acted just like the Gestapo in Nazi Germany, then stuck in a 2'6" square cage in the back of a police van in a police station yard for nearly three hours! SEE ATTACHMENT.
>
> It would help if I could discuss your complaint, in order that I may be
> able to obtain further details from you and in order to explain the
> complaints process. I am available on the telephone number below. If you
> do not get an answer I would be grateful if you would leave a contact
> number so I can return your call.
I am well aware of the 'Complaints Procedures' & know only too well that ALL such 'Procedures' are designed & used to send the victim running round in circles until his brain becomes addled, he becomes exhausted, or gives up in disgust! Why on earth do you want to speak on the telephone? Is it because you are anxious that there should be no record? I prefer that all communication between us to be by email, & thus ON record. (More in red lower down)
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.
> Regards,
> Kate Roberts
> Wirral Complaints Liaison Officer. 0151 777 2086

South Wales Police sued for One Million Euros for Falsifying Machine Gun and Medical Evidence

Maurice — Thu, 26 May 2011 17:14:00 GMT

STOP PRESS

Welsh Court of Appeal Lost!

25% of original Damages Claim Struck Out....the highly sensitve political ones (see December 2010 site video)

'C'est un judgment bizarre', a Breton would say!

Immediate Thoughts on Receipt of 17^th May 2011 Court of Appeal Judgment, BELOW, Refusing Application to Appeal

A. Upon reading the judgment, who wrote it? Defendant's solictors?

B. Someone was back in London by the time the trial judge, HHJSeys LLewelyn QC, read the 'first' reasons realising the visiting judge had not addressed the main issues in dispute, namely, an exeptional case of bullying needing to be consolidated with stayed 4th ,5th , 6th Actions, including the new machine gun case, BELOW, referred to, extensively, in the Claimant's pleadings here LINK SKM

C. Who, then, wrote the 'second' reasons, as if an after thought explaining, maybe, why Cardiff court held back the decision, from the Claimant, for nine days?

D. Clearly, just using the 'struck out' list, below, as examples for the oral appeal shortly (London ), [ALL INVITED, DINNER, as usual, ON ME], is it blatently obvious either MR JUSTICE KITCHIN is also being bullied by 'HM Partnership' or was he never given the facts, on appeal, of the forty odd incidents listed in the first three Actions? With Cardiff manager's track record nothing would surprise me.
There can only be one truth - no matter whose hands it's in...
Maurice J Kirk

1. Stolen Cheques

The thief was identified by the Claimant in Barry Post Office during 2010 Claimant's Application to HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC, in the Lower court, for Permission to Appeal. Both the court and police were informed of his whereabouts, by the Claimant but the Defendant again refused to investigate when his address was traceable from the post office. And a High Court judge now says the South Wales Police have no 'duty'!......With over a hundred incidents of this type of wicked conduct, within the seven or so Actions! Just how many does it take for a policeman to be culpable?

Mr Kitchin knows, to amalgamate cases further risks prison for high ranking South Wales Police.

That's HM Partnership's real 'Reasons' for yet another typical example in our British courts in 'meltdown', not to be published in newspapers.

'Struck Out' due to 'Collateral Attack' on a conviction obtained during an incident

2. Police Caught on Overhead Roadside Video [See it on video Gallery, 5th one back]

Despite police refusing to disclose videos of Claimant being 'beaten up' in Cardiff police cells, the original magistrates and Cardiff Crown Court were not even being allowed to see the overhead road side video because police withheld its disclosure until a year too late.

[The police cell videos were doctored, blanking out the top half of film to hide police identity]

Now the Appeal Court judge did not view the video either! Mr Kitchin undoubtedly argues 'police beating up their prisoners' is 'not relevant' because the terrified Claimant stupidly should not have pleaded guilty to trivial motoring offence thereby giving the bullying police immunity Immunity against any of their conduct throuout the incident...scarry or not scarry??

Roadside Video [5th back on this website video gallery] catches Cardiff police 'beating up' the Claimant after being dragged out of his car. This was before he was even arrested for ‘failure to give road side breath test' having just been followed directly from the Cardiff Crown Court where he and his secretary had been all morning complaining to the then, Recorder of Cardiff, Mr Justice Roderick Evans, about nine years of excessive South Wales Police bullying and proving police documents had been forged (see next incident).

3. Alleged Breach of the Peace at Vale Glamorgan Show

Another, 'Struck out' due to collateral attack on a conviction that, this time, never happened !!! The Claimant was never even charged (four versions of withheld BOP as Cla imant'sexhibits), jailed but never convicted. Bridgend Clerk of the Court, many months later, persuaded police, over lunch, to withdraw the alleged BOP offence, part way through a trial of other charges, quite unrelated, another time, another place, because the Claimant would obviously plead 'not guilty' and would have to go to prison due to common law!

Liar. Just as at the first hearing, in Barry, the Claimant was not told of what the female prosecutor or clerk had before them, witnessed by Claimant's secretary. It was BOP in three different forms!!!!!

The Claimant 'made it worth someone's while' to extract from Bridgend Magistrates records the original clerk's notes (exhibit) confirming scandalous conduct

4. 'Struck Out' due to 'collateral attack' in Claimant's absence from court due to in hospital after motor bike accident!

Veterinary nurse, planted in back of court, signed a sworn affidavit after hearing police stating:

"He drives around in his little white sports car quoting human rights...we are going to get the b'stard".

A trivial motoring conviction should not be the excuse for a High Court judge to protect the bullies breaking UK law.

5 The Defence's Hunter Case Law argument was quite inappropriate for such an unusual, extreme and excessive bullying case with more than one hundred incidents in the six or seven Particulars of Claim. Just how many incidents of police bullying does it take to remove their devine right not to investigate but allowed to cause physical injury, time and time again?

6. Defendant's ‘Mindset' not relevant?!!!!!! Has this High Court judge ever been confronted with such extreme acts of criminal conduct by police?. Of course not but the 'Maurices' of this world who dare question 'authority' are expendable SEE the injury list IN 'VICTIMS UNITE' blogs..

See 26^th May 2011 Machine Gun Particulars of Claim [ below] including False Psychiatric records all fabricated to obtain a false imprisonment designed to interfere with these very civil proceedings. Of course Mr Kitchin avoided the issue, that was his brief.

7. South Wales Police's, ‘Operation Orchid', at the same time, putting the fear of God into my wife when they threatened to have Social Services snatch our 10 year old daughter away has caused quite unforseen repercussions.

Etc, etc.

Mr Kitchin clearly does not realise anarchy is only just around the corner, in Wales and possibly, elsewhere, headed by those who know just where and when to strike, if the break down of law and order in our appalling law courts, driven by avarice, is not sorted out RIGHT NOW.

MACHINE GUN CASE

Once again it is the K Team that has to draft the court papers as no lawyer has been found after a 15 months trawl through solicitors's offices. It is of no surprise to me when you consider Dr Tegwyn Williams was given 'carte blanche' to falsify medical reports for 10, no less, Cardiff judges all knowing, full well, they were untrue but refusing bail due some higher sinister authority. Only one Welsh newspaper, The Glamorgan Gem, published a few of the appalling facts of dishonesty thoughout the Welsh judiciary in this case. If had not been for this web site, publishing day by day accounts of the trial, I would still be in jail due to that HM Partnership lot headed by Nicholarse Cooke QC, The Recorder of Cardiff.

There only remains outstanding which quick act of retribution is appropriate for the likes of Dr Tegwyn Williams as he, unlike Barbara Wilding, is not afforded the luxury of an armed guard. A Welsh court process? What a joke! That is pretty pointless considering our watching the Welsh NHS leave him loose to do it all over again on some unsuspecting individual with less luck.

Common Purpose and Law Society intend to wipe out jury trails and lay magistrates the very two facets of my machine gun case that shone through as the back bone of what we should be proud of. When the two systems are finally snuffed out by HMCS last one switch off the lights, please.

Court of Appeal Judgment by the Honourable Mr Justice Kitchin

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

Reasons:

An appeal has no real prospect of
success.

ln a long and careful judgment of 30
November 2010 the judge addressed the application by the defendant to strike
out the claimant's claims in respect of a number of incidents

ln particular

ln action CF04141, the judge struck
out an allegation in respect of the theft of cheques in that, as a matter of
law, the defendant did not owe the claimant a privately actionable duty of
care.

In actions BS614159-MC65, CF101741 and
CF204141, the judge struck out a series of allegations as being an abuse of
process in that they amounted to collateral attacks on criminal convictions of
the defendant or on conclusive findings which have been made against him in
other proceedings.

The claimant now seeks permission to
appeal on a number of grounds. There is nothing in any of them.

First the claimant contends that
the proceedings took place without him being able to take part. This was
plainly not the case. The judge explained in detail in paragraphs 3 and 4 of
his judgment the careful steps he took to ensure that the claimant was not in
any way disadvantaged and referred in paragraphs 3 to 6 to the extensive
submissions from the claimant which he considered.

Second, the claimant says he was
subjected to unfair pressure from the court and was unfairly disadvantaged. To
the contrary, it is apparent from the paragraphs of the judgment to which I
have referred that the judge took all reasonable steps to ensure the claimant
was not subjected to unfair pressure, nor disadvantaged.

Third, the claimant submits the
court wrongly excluded evidence. I reject this contention. There was no
material dispute of fact in relation to any of the allegations the judge struck
out.

Fourth, it is said the judge
failed to address key submissions. I do not accept this is so. The judge set
out the claimant's case on each issue very clearly. Indeed the judge accepted a
number of the claimant's submissions in refusing to strike out aspects of his
case.

Fifth, the claimant contends the
judge erred in law. In my judgment the defendant has not identified any proper
ground in support of this allegation. The judge correctly identified the
principle established in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and
his application of that principle to the facts alleged by the claimant cannot
be faulted. The other claims were struck out upon the application of the well
established principle that it is not permissible for a claimant to bring a
claim which amounts to collateral attack on an earlier criminal conviction or a
conclusive finding made against him in earlier proceedings.

Finally, the claimant asserts that
the judge failed to protect the claimant against the defendant's mindset. This
provides no basis for an appeal against the specific findings of the judge.

For all these reasons the judge was
also right to refuse permission to appeal.

Reasons

This is a case management order. The
judge declined to order all the cases to be consolidated. This was a perfectly
reasonable decision, particularly since the cases are already being heard
together.

There is no need for the cases to be
transferred to the High Court. Nor has any justification been shown for having
them transferred out of Wa1es.

An appeal has no real prospect of success.

17^th May 2011

Reply to Refusal

Dear Ms Pahl,

Please Forward, in your usual reliable way

31st May 2011

Kirk v South Wales Police

Appeal at Court of Appeal No.s CF029/2011a & CF030/2011a
( May 2011 court letter contains variations in case numbers)

FAO Clerk of the Court,

Further to the predicted refusal notice, based on politics and not facts, received on Saturday, 28th May, I apply for an oral hearing and be permitted witnesses to the facts, before the court, to attend without fear of intimidation.

I also apply that it take place not before but on the 15th June or onwards, in London, but not 28th June as it clashes with another court and an equally scandalous bit of Welsh bloody nonsense.

I also have medical appointments in both France and Londoin to entwine with dates already fixed.

If the hearing is in South Wales I run a very real risk of being falsly arrested again and finish up in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, as was attempted last time, following deliberate falsification of both Welsh HM CPS information and Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric reports.

Last time, following the Welsh filth and their usual tactics, being completely ignored or actively supported by 10 Welsh judges, Welsh HM Court Service and Welsh National Health Service, my liberty, without an appeal, now comes secondary in priority, following revenge, the latter, set for the rest of my short life, to be sufficient to educate the whole world, by exposing your evil Welsh judiciary, driven by greed.

Oh, if only I had listend to both my mother and father about the truth of South Wales, following their shock, in 1992, that I had bought a veterinary practice near Cardiff.

Yours,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Puits aux Papillons

St Doha

22230 Merdrignac

France

0033624571548

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

IN THE CARDIFF COURT

Maurice Kirk Claimant

Chief Constable of South Wales Police Defendant

Particulars of Claim

1. The Defendant was at all material times the chief officer of the South Wales Constabulary and the police officers hereinafter referred to were at all material times acting under the direction and control of the Defendant in the performance or purported performance of their functiion

2. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft by the Claimant's old friend, Mr Viv Bellamy

3. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 replica aeroplane and ‘gun' from a prosecution witness with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' s an integral part of the fuselage and therefore exempt under the 1968 Fire rms Act.

4. 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This became the critical argument in the trial but blocked throughout the twelve days of roceedings of utter nonsense.

5. 2000: The DH2 with the same Lewis antique was flown by the Claimant at the Farnborough Air Show by invitation of another old friend of the Claimant, Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame.

6. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' mounted.

7. 2007: he DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out, by the Royal Air Force, to a civilian for further repair in Hampshire also aware it was decommissioned.

8. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and ‘gun' to another display pilot, a prosecution witness, who ‘modified' the gun for his own purposes.

9. On or about 25^th February 2009 the Defendant signed a sworn affidavit knowing it to be or ought to have known it to be, false, in that paragraphs, between14 to 21, contained erroneous information, namely, incidents, involving both the Defendant and Claimant had ppeared to never have occurred. Police court cases had occurred and the Defendant's attendance, in force, with the use of a crow bar and sledge hammer, to enter the Claimant's Cardiff veterinary surgery, had also occurred. This amounts at least to misfeasance in public office.

10. Following the 2008 Court Order by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, for the Defendant to sign an affidavit that full disclosure of evidence, under the Defendant's control, had been disclosed to the Claimant, the latter entered the Defendants solicitor's' offices, on or about the 25^th February 2009 complaining the Court Order had still not been carried out.

11. The Claimant, upon receipt of a copy of the Defendant's affidavit then entered Barry Police Station and was both videoed and interviewed at length following his complaint that the Chief Constable had knowingly signed a false affidavit to avoid disclosure of evidence relevant to the nineteen year running covert police surveillance and civil actions for damages, referred to in CF101741 + four others.

12. The sale and subsequent management change of the Claimant's South Wales veterinary practice, in May 2009, allowed the Claimant to reveal, at last, on U Tube and websites worldwide the conduct of the South Wales Police with their covert surveillance team that had operated for well over ten years. The Claimant's 64 page June 09 witness statement, summarising their unusual and extreme behavior, was now being prepared for court.

13. On 1^st June 2009 the Defendant caused the Claimant to be subjected to a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) enquiry following a meeting, at the South Wales Police Head Quarters, Bridgend, by the Independent Advisory Group (IAG).

14. On 8^th June 2009, at Barry police station MAPPA meeting, police informed the agencies, present, including staff from Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison, that the Claimant was a category level 3, very dangerous and was to be arrested and ‘taken into custody' for being in possession of a prohibited weapon, a machine gun.

15. The police also informed the agencies that should the Claimant approach the Chief Constable then he was likely to be shot which has caused the Claimant to seek asylum in France for fear of his life

16. On 15^th June 2009 the Claimant brought further civil proceedings, in the Administrative Court, London, against the Defendant and Co-Defendant, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons relating to covert police surveillance. Covert plain clothed police officers were already in attendance.

17. On 18^th June 2009 the Claimant again laid the complaint, this time inside the offices of the Defendant's Bridgend South Wales Police head quarters where again there was refusal, by the Defendant, to ‘mutually exchange
witness statements' ordered by HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC

18. On 19^th June 2009 the Defendant again refused to exchange witness statements when the Defendant's solicitors, Dolmans, were contacted by the Claimant despite the Court Order having given the Defendant until 4pm.that day

19. On 20^thJune 2009 the Defendant's solicitors laid complaint with their client, against the Claimant, to be arrested for a ‘threat of criminal damage' which amounts to more bullying and harassment.

20. On 21^st June 2009 police Operations, ‘Orchid' and ‘Chalice, caused' a sizeable force of police officers to surround the Claimant's home, in St Donats, Vale of Glamorgan, requiring an armed response unit, a police helicopter and both forensic psychiatrists and a lay advisor for the Claimant to be in attendance. The operation was aborted once the Claimant was seen drinking tea with his family in their front garden.

21. On 22^nd June 2009 24/7 police surveillance caused the Claimant to be arrested in the road outside his property and cautioning him from a written script, following legal advise, that he had been arrested for:

a. Threat of committing criminal damage

b. Being in possession of a prohibited weapon

c. Being in possession of prohibited ammunition

22. ‘Operation Orchid' caused a second team of South Wales Police to interview the Claimant's wife at the family home, with the hope they could obtain a statement from her that the Claimant had a history of mental illness. This was in the hope of avoiding the criminal proceedings being put to strict proof. The Claimant's wife was threatened that her and Claimant's ten years old daughter was at serious risk of being taken into care, by the South Wales social services, if she did not cooperate. Blatant intimidation and harassment of the Claimant and his family.

23. The Claimant was never charged with the first arrest allegation, (a), and despite repeated court orders to reveal the evidence and statements by Dolmans, solicitors, they assisted their client by being a party to the February 2009 Chief Constable's sworn affidavit.

24. Despite repeated applications in Cardiff Crown Court, by the Claimant, for specific disclosure relating to the alleged ‘threat of criminal damage' to countless judges, HM Crown Prosecution Service, South Wales Police and Dolmans, the Defendant's solicitors, being the complainant, all refused.

25. Final proof of conspiracy needed just one last refused application, this time before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, the management judge in the ongoing civil proceedings between the Claimant and Defendant.

26. Dolmans had little choice but to again refuse to disclose the evidence of their client's criminal conduct and/or gross mismanagement during the days leading up to the Claimant's 22^nd June 2009 ridiculous arrest

27. Dolmans falsified evidence assisting in the arrest of the Claimant, their client, the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Ms Barbara Wilding, the latter assuring them, no doubt, of their immunity to prosecution. The overall plan was to prejudice the Claimant's position in the ongoing civil proceedings now that the ‘cover up' of an expensive ten year police covert surveillance team, on the Claimant, was starting to fall apart.

28. There was no intention of arresting the Claimant on fire arms charges. The Claimant, without full MAPPA approval or understanding, had been set up to be ‘lawfully killed' by an armed South Wales Police unit under direct orders from senior police officers.

29. Events following the early 2009 decision by these high ranking police officers, to have the Claimant eliminated, eventually became unmanageable due to the unpredictable conduct of their moving target and the effect of his postings on his website.

30. Between 22^nd and 23^rd June 2009 the police filmed and removed, from his home, the Claimant's lawfully held shot guns, ammunition and court files, the latter relating to the Claimant's ongoing complaint of police bullying, harassment, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments conducted in most un usual and extreme
manner suggesting vengeance at the tax payer's expense

31. None of the above items, guns, ammunition or court files have ever been returned to the Claimant with the police continuing to block the Claimant's right to re new his gun licences.

32. On 24^th June 2009 a police officer or officers laid information against the Claimant at Barry Magistrates court alleging that that the Claimant had been ‘in possession of a prohibited weapon', one antique 1916 Lewis machine gun and had sold the ‘gun', a year earlier, both contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act

33. The English police refused to ‘touch the subject with a barge pole' once they became aware that the South Wales Police had persuaded the Civil Aviation Authority to telephone ahead to the new owner, in England, to dismount the Lewis antique and alone drive it across Lincolnshire and beyond to find any licenced arms dealer where it could be, later, collected by the Defendant.

34. The Welsh police then ‘hawked' the Lewis antique nearly two thousand miles around the UK, contrary to strict Home Office Regulations, during which time the Defendant had it ‘modified' at their special police laboratory in South Wales. This Claim is yet another one of misfeasance in public office.

35. Upon reading the Claimant's June 2009 64 page Defence statement, on the Defendant's real motives behind his arrest, the Barry Magistrates court, together with legal advice, allowed the Claimant immediate and unconditional bail.

36. On 25^th June 2009 the police appealed the Court Order deliberately lying on the relevant facts, under consideration, to HHJ Hughes causing the Claimant to be further detained in custody in Cardiff prison.

37. Repeat of these lies by the Defendant occurred before a further nine more Cardiff Crown Court judges when opposing bail. False antecedent history together with this malicious false imprisonment is one of the major Claims of the Claimant.

38. The Defendant, over nearly eight months, deliberately refused the Claimant standard or specific disclosure of evidence, under their control, that would have cleared the Claimant's name before the need of a trial. Defamation is another serious Claim by the Claimant.

39. In July 2009 the Defendant brought a third indictment namely, obtaining income from the ‘proceeds of crime'. A judge, much later, caused this third indictment to be withdrawn. This event contributes to the large number of proceedings that the Claimant has won against the Defendant.

40. On 3^rd August 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams, forensic psychiatrist and Director of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police forensic Unit, at Bridgend, signed a psychiatric report recommending the Claimant be sectioned and further remanded in custody to his medium secure psychiatric unit, Caswell Clinic, under Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act having not even examined his patient

41. Dr Teqwyn Williams had in his possession, before 3^rd August 2009, psychiatric reports from both HM Prison Cardiff and his own Caswell Clinic doctors, that the Claimant did not need any medication or treatment relevant to the 1983 Mental Health Act.

42. On 28^thAugust 2009 a series of brain scans, arranged by Dr Tegwyn Williams, indicated no relevant abnormalities in the Claimant, confirmed at the time, in writing, by at least one expert at the Princess Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgend.

43. In September 2009, after it was clear the Claimant was not going to employ a lawyer, with sworn allegiance to the South Wales courts, Dr Tegwyn Williams recommended that the Claimant be now transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison (IPP), Imprisonment for Public Protection with a term of imprisonment, without trail, of an inordinate length stating, without appropriate qualifications, the Claimant had ‘significant brain damage' and ‘possible cancer', neither of which had much chance of recovery.

44. Whilst this Claim could be conceived against Dr Tegwyn Williams alone, it is concluded here as a major act of harassment by the Defendant who had commissioned Dr Williams via FTAC and MAPPA.

45. The Claimant, following much needed legal advice retains the right of including Dr Tegwyn Williams as a Co-Defendant in these civil proceedings for damages.

46. On or about the 24^th October 2009 the Claimant was further remanded in custody in Cardiff Prison reliant on a further Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric report the Defendant knew or ought to have known was false as the National Health Service doctor was not even qualified to sign such a court document as true, to the best of his belief.

47. On the 2nd December 2009 the prosecution had convened a hearing, not tape recorded and in the absence of the Claimant, left locked up under the court, to discuss, at length, with the proposed trial judge and Dr Tegwyn Williams, the possibilities of avoiding the trial by way of a Section 41 or similar, of the 1983 Mental Health Act, that could have the Claimant locked away, without trial, for life.

48. But the Defendant had failed to obtain the second signatory from any appropriately qualified forensic psychiatrist, required by law, in either England or Wales, but not for the want of trying.

49. On the 2^nd December 2009 The Defendant failed to inform the proposed trial judge, HHJ Bidder QC, that the Claimant had caused not less than twelve psychiatric reports from a same number of psychiatrists that the Claimant was not requiring the need for either psychiatric assessment or treatment.

50. HM Court Service (Wales), as is their habit, failed to disclose to HHJ Bidder QC or the Claimant of the Claimant's privately obtained expert medical report, from outside Wales, having been served on Cardiff Crown Court the day before by an English solicitor and past MP for the Vale of Glamorgan.

51. The report seriously contradicted both those of Dr Tegwyn Williams' and the findings of Professor Roger Wood, the latter also unqualified to state an opinion that might affect permanent custody of the Claimant

52. On 7^tt December 2009 the Claimant, using other lawyers, again from well outside South Wales, caused the MAPPA coordinator, based at the Defendant's HQ, to indicate, in writing, ‘ The right arm did not know what the left arm of the law was doing'

53. On 17^th December 2009 the Defendant headed a hurriedly convened MAPPA meeting in the Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, due to yet another Claimant bail Application before HHJ Bidder QC scheduled that day in Newport Crown Court.

54. The Claimant's name for some reason, currently subject to HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC's outstanding Order for disclosure, was removed from the MAPPA register without any explanation to the Claimant causing further hardship and distress to the Claimant, in prison, still trying to establish his exact MAPPA status and why, just a before trial carrying a possible mandatory ten year prison sentence.

55. The Claimant has to this day never established why and later, why not, he was on the MAPPA register with the Defendant repeatedly refusing to disclose, contrary to law.

56. Defense evidence or ‘summing up' was never needed due the prosecution's fairy tale, a view held by at least nine members of the jury, stating to the Claimant, immediately after the trial, that their decision was already concluded by eleven of the jury after the first day of evidence and cross examination

57. On 9^th February 2010, at Cardiff Crown Court, the Claimant was found ‘not guilty' on the two remaining indictments and was released from custody with no conditions.

58. The jury also made the Claimant aware, immediately after the hearing, that they questioned why both the original seller to the Claimant, of the Lewis antique and the current owner, buying from the Claimant, were not also in the dock or behind bars.

59. The Claimant's complaints to the relevant police authorities, to investigate the conduct within South Wales Police, before and after his arrest and nearly eight months in custody, have been swept under the proverbial carpet in a perfunctory manner to which the Claimant is accustomed since first settling in South Wales.

60. The arrest and detention and prosecution of the Claimant were unlawful as the most appalling act of malice.

61. There were no reasonable grounds to believe that the Claimant was probably guilty of the offence for which he was arrested.

62. The decisions to arrest and detain the Claimant were such as no reasonable police officer would have reached.

63. The Claimant was detained for longer than was reasonably necessary and in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

64. Further, the actions of police officers set out above constitute harassment within meaning of section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and misfeasance in public office.

65. By reason of the matters aforesaid, the Claimant has suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety, damage to his reputation and was deprived of his liberty. He has been subjected to bullying, malicious prosecution and harassment, false imprisonment and contrary to the 1998 Human Rights Act.

Withheld NHS Medical Records

66. On or about 10^th February 2010 the Defendant arrested and detained in custody the Claimant for entering Caswell Clinic, when invited by the staff to collect his full medical records, promised by Dr Tegwyn Williams following the Claimant's applications under the Freedom of Information and Data Protection Acts. Also promises to his GP's secretary, in the presence of the Claimant, by the manager, stated they could be collected from the Caswell Clinic porter's lodge. His multi agency collusion has caused serious aggravation to the Claimant's health

67. The full medical records were not disclosed and currently remain with the South Wales National Health Service, also now refusing to hand them over.

68. The Claimant was charged with numerous allegations and jailed. Severe bail conditions were set before all charges were later dropped with the Defendant refusing to properly investigate the Claimant's complaint into the apparent falsified medical records written by both Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic and Professor Roger Wood of Swansea University

69. The Defendant's actions were both malicious and bullying and/or yet a further example of misfeasance in public office the Claimant has suffered under, by the Defendant, since 1992

HM Court Service (Wales).

70. In July 2010 ex South Wales Police officer, a Derrick Hassan, violently assaulted the Claimant, dependant at the time on a pair of crutches and on daily morphine sulphate and other analgesic medication. Hassan pushed the Claimant part way down a flight of stairs in Cardiff Crown Court causing the Claimant to attend casualty and treatment for a damaged ankle and increased his hip pain in a much overdue total hip replacement required, caused by the failure ofthe Defendant to investigate the Claimant's complaint, relating to falsified medical evidence. The Vale Hospital, Vale of Glamorgan, had to take this into consideration, without clarification being available, to cancel elected surgery.

71. Despite being given the name and address of an independent witness, not part of HM Court Service (Wales), the Defendant refused to have him interviewed thereby acting irresponsibly and with without due care. The conduct was malicious.

Racially Aggravated Public Order allegations

72. 69 On or about the 2^nd August 2010 the Claimant was arrested and jailed by the Defendant purely for monetary gain by a third party. The Crown Prosecution Service offered ‘no evidence' and the Claimant was found ‘not guilty' in his absence of all parties

73. Again, the Defendant refused to investigate thousands of pounds of damage caused, caught in the act by the Claimant, by these same complainants of the dismissed Public Order offences.

74. This malicious prosecution is a further act of both misfeasance in public office and harassment

Stolen Cheques incident currently under appeal at The Court of Appeal

75. On or around November 2010 the Claimant identified the thief of his stolen surgery cheques, some nine years earlier, the subject currently on appeal from Action CF101+ three others, before the Court of Appeal (Wales). The thief was giving his identity details to a named clerk in Barry Post Office. The Defendant, due to ill health and on crutches was unable to apprehend the thief.

76. Previously, the Defendant in the defenses of the earlier Action admitted to the Claimant that the Defendant had not been able to trace the thief despite being, known to the Defendant, given film footage of his cashing falsified Claimant's cheques and given his home address in Barry.

77. The Claimant informed the Defendant of the above new information but the Defendant refused to properly investigate or even speak to the clerk at the Barry Post Office or the Claimant on the new evidence.

78. In summary, the Claimant has suffered from the malicious intent of the Defendant's misfeasance in public office as well as the unprofessional behaviour of the Defendant's solicitors and of the Defendant's forensic psychiatrist. The Defendant's bullying and harassment resulted in false imprisonment, severe damage to reputation, completely unnecessary legal proceedings and thus a claim to damages, exemplary damages, special a criminal investigation and costs.

79. Unless restrained by the Court, police officers will continue to harass the Claimant.

80. The Claimant retains his right for trial by jury and for a lawyer to read and amend this Claim

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Puits aux Papillons
St Doha
22 230 Merdrignac
Bretagne
France

26^th May 2011

Copy to Cardiff Court of Appeal
             Cardiff County Court
             His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC
             The French Immigration Authorities

First Petition to Parliament on Behalf of Victims of White Collar Crime

Maurice — Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:22:00 GMT

The following Petition has been submitted to our new MP for the Vale of Glamorgan, Alun Cairns MP, following a very lively debate at our 25th January 2011 House of Commons meeting with both Members of the House of Lords and House of Commons in attendance, a committee room, I may say, STUFFED with Victims of the banks, HM and our law courts, solicitors and NHS (see photo gallery, other blogs and PDF downloads).

To the House of Commons

The petition of Maurice J Kirk BVSc, a citizen of the UK at 52, Tynewydd Road, Barry CF62 8AZ, declares that he has tried everything in his powers as a former veterinary surgeon to stand up to the harassment of South Wales Police who have delayed his civil action against them.

The citizen has suffered from harassment by South Wales Police that culminated in 7 months imprisonment, including 3 months in a psychiatric clinic, after getting him struck off the Register of Veterinary Surgeons.

One of the incidents in a series of interconnected legal actions was the machine gun case. The allegation was the possession and sale of a ‘gun' even though it was decommissioned and an ‘add on' to an historic aircraft. In the run up to the trial, however, South Wales Police mobilised Multi-Agency Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) hoping to shoot or section the citizen for life. MAPPA categorisation was used for imprisonment which included 3 months in a psychiatric clinic. A leaked MAPPA document, published on his website www.kirkflyingvet.com, shows that the Police had a firearms response.

The harassment included the falsification of medical records claiming that he has serious brain damage, possibly brain cancer, to get him sectioned. This prevented his surgical team from carrying out a hip replacement scheduled for June 2010.

While the citizen won the machine gun case in court, he did not get any costs or compensation for malicious prosecution, false imprisonments and generally the deprivation of his human and professional rights as a veterinary surgeon.

The petitioner therefore requests that the Government steps in as Compensator of Last Resort

Dear Mr Cairns,

The 25th January meeting at the House of Commons was a resounding success with many Members from both Houses, with 'like minds', all in one room! The ever widening divide between the basic rules of justice and the conduct of the South Wales Police, our law courts, Crown Prosecution Service and now, HM Court Service, is really most serious because it is clear there is no accountability for their joint actions.,.

South Wales National Health Service and our Health Minister refuse to hand over my medical records in their current control and with CPS, police, Caswell Clinic, HM Prison, Cardiff, Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood are all refusing to clarify, with my surgeons, my medical history when I was in prison custody meaning still further delay in my much needed hip operation.

When can I next see you, please, either in London or Barry? I have currently obtained asylum in France following the repeated attempts by the South Walers Police to either have me shot or jailed for life so any meeting must be before my witnesses and suitably recorded.

Yours sincerely, .

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Hip Operation Cancelled Again as yet Another Cardiff Court Refuses HM Prison Medical Records Disclosure & Complaint to Police Authority

Maurice — Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:42:00 GMT

MR MAURICE KIRK 1st Claimant

DR TEGWYN WILLIAMS 1st Defendant

Ref TWH.448470.48

Before District Judge T M Phillips sitting at Cardiff County Court, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, 2 Park Street,Cardiff, CF10 1ET.

Upon hearing Mr M Bowen for the claimant and Counsel for the defendant

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. The hearing of the defendants application dated 16 September 2010 to strike out the claim and to consider whether a civil restraint order is appropriate be further adjourned to 15 March 2011 at 11:00 (EHT 3 hours).

2. At the next hearing there will also be considered by the court the claimants applications dated 7th January 2011 and 18 January 2011 (yet to be listed).

3. The claimant may attend the hearing via video link (he being responsible for making the necessary arrangements well before the hearing).

4. a) in the event of the claimant being unable to attend the next hearing due to his medical condition, then he must send to the court and to the defendants solicitors at least 3 working days prior to the hearing a letter from a medical practitioner setting out the position and confirming in the Doctors opinion the inability of Mr Kirk to attend via video link.

b) In the event of the claimant's surgery being outstanding due to alleged non disclosure of medical records or documents, the Doctor do also specify in his letter:

(i) the medical records or documentation outstanding,

(ii) why any relevant tests or investigation cannot be undertaken by the French medical Profession so that the surgery can proceed.

5. Costs of today be costs in the application.

Disproportionate legal costs Lawyers, Morgan Cole, Cardiff, have threatened me with a £6000 bill if I do not withdraw, following my £40 Application, in a British court of law, just to make Dr Tegwyn Williams, of Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, or the NHS, to disclose his evidence he gave to His honour Judge Bidder QC, on the 2nd December 2009. He was there, tape recorder switched off, in a so called 'Court of Record', Cardiff Crown Court.falsifying medical record....what a joke!

What was he doing there, in the first place, is the first question? I was, as prisoner in Cardiff prison not even under his 'care'!

His trying to persuade the judge, on his own, to have me sectioned, for life, without trial, under the Section 41 of 1983 Mental Health Act, to a High Security Prison, was an uphill struggle. But his masonic masters, South Wales Police, had so ordered or he could no longer be allowed to worship the devil.

Tomorrow, in Cardiff County Court, be there, these lawyers, barristers, clerks etc, ALL AT TAX PAYER'S EXPENSE,just for a petty debt action for, lost bus fares, will be there....you will enjoy...Case is at 2pm BUT read the latest Downloads first

Dr Tegwyn Williams, of Caswell Clinic, Bridgend refuses to clarify his opinion and conduct , over such a serious matter as possible brain tumour .

How, on 2nd December 09, he tells the Cardiff Crown Court I have a possible brain tumour and too dangerous to be released when at the 17th December 2009 MAPPA meeting, he tells high ranking officers of the South Wales Police, the prosecutor, social services, probation and prison, all sitting around the same table, in his clinic, a completely opposing medical opinion?

This caused the meeting to rule I was "no longer considered dangerous to the public and my name was immediately removed from MAPPA level 3 category, [terrorist level].

BUT, to this day Dr Tegwyn Williams, South Wales NHS officials, HM Prison and MAPPA have refused to notify the patient of any of this and continue to refuse the information to the surgeons, waiting to operate, on either side of the English Channel.

It stinks, doesn't it?

Disproportionate Legal Costs: Breach of Human Rights

I am possibly about to go into hospital and so email without being too close on detail, save to say that at this time, that I draw the attention of the Court and Defendant's lawyers to the European Court of Human Rights having ruled that the Daily Mirror's freedom of expression was violated by the legal costs it had to pay when it lost a privacy case brought by Naomi Campbell.

Although arguments will need to be reversed and translated to other human rights, for a comparison with my claim as the Daily Mirror are journalists and was the Defendant. As we are aware, this thinking of the Court of Human Rights, to limit legal costs is in keeping with some comments in my submission in December 2010, when asking His Honour Seys Llewellyn QC for permission to appeal.

As also in my submission in December 2010, the arguments here are also more profound than how much legal costs can the Defendant or Defendant's lawyers claim in my Cardiff case.

Drawing from London barrister Mr Challenger's comments, it would seem that public policy on where the Police (or public bodies) can be sued is, in reality very much affected by the cost of employing lawyers. As lawyers may not now be able to charge as much in legal costs, that would seem another reason for public policy to be reviewed to find what incremental changes may occur from restricting lawyers costs.

page 2

2nd December 2009

ALL PROCEEDINGS

(11.39)

JUDGE BIDDER: ... appropriately qualified psychiatrist then the fitness to plead doesn't really arise. I have one report by you reaching a conclusion; I have another report by Dr Silva reaching a different conclusion. I can't act on the basis of that issue without there being two such reports and there aren't two such reports. In the circumstances I don't think there is a great deal of purpose in you remaining in court.

MR TWOMLOW: May I just say perhaps, having spoken to Dr Williams this morning, that I think having seen the contents of Dr Silva's report he is also of the view that Mr Kirk would be fit to plead subject to the ... it was only the case of whether he has cancer or not I think that Dr Williams was concerned about, but I didn't wish to ...

Continuing "HM Partnership" Cardiff Conspiracy

This following eight page submission, with French doctor's request for medical records, took weeks of work to obtain and were e-mailed to the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre at 9.30am on Tuesday, two and a half days before the 2pm hearing but was not given to the presiding judge.

Extract of secure e-mail, to Cardiff court, that DID NOT BOUNCE BACK carrying the 'submissions', as an example to the naifve, of the evilness, tax payer funded "HM Partnership" in Cardiff play, every day.

'please forward asap to the learned judge dealing with the above case

There must surely be another person on another e-maill to deal with this?

All current known Cardiff court e-mails bounce back'

To the Cardiff County Court

BS61459, CF101741, 0CF03922 & 8 Others

Maurice Kirk v Dr Tegwyn Williams

20th January 2011 Hearing

Application for Adjournment and Disclosure (Request Dr Williams/Defendant make a signed statement)

1) It may help the Court to know that, I am unwell and at my home in Brittany, awaiting a
hip operation on 20 January 2011 in France.

2) Therefore this reply is worded by lay persons (non lawyers). The opinions show the
independent view of a team trying to help because of their concerns.

3) In short, there is major concern of this moment is the way the Defendant Dr Tegwyn
Williams, shows bad faith and „deliberately fails to deal‟ by trying to "hide behind
lawyers" and he will not „personally‟ comment or clarify in issues as serious as brain
cancer, brain damage and severe disorders of the mind.

4) Furthermore the Defendant‟s refusal to clarify causes the confusion that in turn delays
urgent hip operation that with problems with mediation and morphine contributes to
keeping the Claimant too unwell to attend court and proceed with this case.

5) An update is that the Defendant‟s obstructive behaviour that therefore delays hip
operations, may have caused, and may continue to cause permanent medical damage
to nerve tissue around the Claimant hip, so to permanently damage the Claimant chance
of recovery.

Adjournment

6) The Court Order of 26 November 2010 point 2 says.

"2. Any applications to adjourn the hearing by reason of medical
matter must be supported by a medical practitioner's letter or
certificate which confirms an inability to attend a Court hearing
estimated to last not more than 1 hour."

7) It seems to say that a doctor's letter is needed for adjournment. That tells me to
expect adjournment if I comply with that Order by the attached letter from Dr Leclerc,
Merdrignac, France. The Breton doctor is concerned that the surgeons have not been
supplied with Dr Tegwyn Williams' information given to the December 09 Crown Court
and to MAPPA meetings. Dr Leclerc is the source of my monthly supply of morphine
sulphate.

Merit and some reasons why the Court may (if it so wishes) find in the Claimant's
favour on all (Claim and Costs).

8) This case is over the expenses the Claimant incurred in trying to find out what opinion Dr Tegwyn Williams has being expressing regards the Claimant. The Claimant believes the reason why the Claimant was not handed over the notes and records, when attending, is because either the records never existed or the Defendant wrote final reports not unlike writing fiction. The Claimant believes the defendant has been dishonest in his report by saying that which he knew not to be true. If what the Claimant believes is true, then the claimant believes Dr Williams should reimburse expenses.

9) As a part of professional standards and conduct for Psychiatrists, careful notes and
records must exist behind the process of any assessment and the final outcome and that notes and records are to be full and copious.

10) It may help the Court to know, that in what records or reports that exist the
Defendant appears to more determine facts, than explore clinical issues regards being
assertion that the Claimant is delusional about very specific facts such as whether or not
the Claimant was harassed by Police. (In contrast to what Dr Williams says His Honour
Seys Llewellyn QC, however, has decided in a preliminary Judgment, dated 30
November 2010, that the sheer volume of incidents of alleged harassment gives merit
for the court to investigate).

11) It is therefore difficult to see how Dr Williams can claim the Claimant is delusional
about quite specific facts.

12) One easy comparison is that the Civil Aviation Authority, in 2010 deemed the
Claimant fit to fly his aeroplanes.

13) To easily support the view of mischievous manipulations there is evidence that
Professor Roger Wood re-wrote his report as being seen by reference to the ex-chief
constable when the chief constable was in office when the report originally written. Most
doctors, possibly as many as nearly twenty, seem not to agree with Dr Tegwyn Williams.
There are many other facts to prove this conduct.

14) The Claimant believes the defendant, having acted improperly regards expressing
opinion he knew to be misleading or knew not to be true, now needed to destroy or hide the notes and records behind any reports.

15) Therefore the Claimant requested the Defendant‟s employers arrange disclosure of
medical records and notes and the Claimant was invited to Caswell Clinic, Bridgend to
collect notes and records. The Claimant had paid for their release and incurred further
expense several times travelling to the Clinic.

16) The Claimant, by acting lawfully and properly, tried to find out what are the notes and records that were used to help arrive at what hopefully would have been an honest and competent opinion. A Court Claim was filed by the Claimant when the Defendant seemed most unwilling to clarify or disclose essential information that the Claimant had paid for, and where the Claimant had incurred travelling expenses. The Defendant appeared so unhelpful and obstructive to the Claimant, to appear to be acting in bad faith.

17) It is entirely normal NHS procedure for a patient to attend to collect confidential
medical information, especially larger medical notes and record files as the post can be
too problematic and particularly insecure for such sensitive information as psychiatric
records.

18) The Claimant chose to exercise his right to attend, but also was told by NHS staff at
his GP surgery that the Defendant's employer and/or Defendant had said the records
are available for collection.

19) The Claimant believes he has obvious and compelling reason to be anxious to attend and find out information for which he is lawfully entitled to know, and paid for. The Court transcript 2 December 2009 shows that the Defendant Dr Tegwyn Williams has been saying that the Claimant has brain cancer, (and more).

20) The Defendant's professional body helps show reason for justification for the
concern that the Defendant shows bad faith and "deliberately failing to deal" by trying to
"hide behind lawyers" and will not "personally" comment or clarify in issues as serious as
brain cancer, brain damage and severe disorders of the mind.

21) To help determine reasonableness, Dr Tegwyn Williams professional body has
guidelines. The Royal College of Psychiatrists page 6 (copy attached) says

"Give patients the information they ask for or need about their condition, its treatment or prognosis
Give information to patients in a way they can understand
Be readily accessible to patients and colleagues when on duty

You must not delay treatment........."

The Royal College of Psychiatrists (copy attached) page 2 also says of duties of doctor registered with the GMC

Give patients information in a way they can understand
Be honest and trustworthy
Avoid abusing your position as a doctor

22) The Claimant has a hip operation booked for 20 January 2011 in France. Dr Williams bad faith is made worse, because the absence of Dr Tegywn Williams to personally clarify causes operations to be cancelled, when the claimant to be most unwell, insevere pain and suffering increasing irreparable nerve damage by operations not proceeding, because of the uncertainty and confusion caused by Dr Tegwyn Williams still refusing to clarify, even when is lawyers now are starting to acknowledge the issues.

23) Regardless of the needed operation, the Claimant quite obviously urgently needs Dr
Tegwyn Williams to personally clarify what is meant by and the prognosis of brain
cancer, permanent brain damage and severe disorders of the mind, so that the Claimant can plan how to live his life.

24) Other Doctors are at a loss to make the needed specific comment, as the Defendant still has failed to provide medical records and notes that would or should occur, if Dr Williams forms an honest and competent opinion as to why he thinks these conditions are relevant to the Claimant.

25) The Claimant asks and feels astonished, questions how the UK Courts can allow
either doctors and lawyers to act as callously in full gaze of the Courts and professional
bodies, and asks for initiatives to redress the balance of power.

26) Furthermore the Defendants lawyers threaten the unwell Claimant with cost to go
into many thousands of pounds over a claim most minor in monetary terms, as a way to
intimidate the Claimant into not learning of such important information when the
Claimant has every right to know.

27) The Claimants asks the Courts support where the Claimant believes Dr Tegwyn
Williams abused his position when the Claimant attended to collect his medical records
and now tries to further abuse his position by hiding behind lawyer and their willingness
to use cost to intimidate by disproportionate use of lawyers fees.

28) The Claimant believes Dr Tegwyn Williams is therefore causing these delays, by not
simply clarifying issues himself.

29) There is also the issue of the total contempt that Dr Tegwyn Williams showed for the
Claimant and the utter unreasonableness when as a patient the Claimant tries to collect
medical records for which he has paid.

30) Given access to the requested information is entirely reasonable and lawful, (both
what was originally requested and also not as yet clarified by Dr Williams) the Claimant
raise the question whether both the Defendant and his lawyers Discriminate against the
Claimant to impose less favourable treatment, (due to alleged disorders of the mind), in
the way the Claimant is denied access to what most people have a right to expect be
provided in a way to afford them dignity.

31) The Claimant believes the Defendant and his lawyers use the power and financial
resources of the state over the Claimant to deny human rights (ECHR Article 3 and
Article 8) and access to a fair trial (ECHR Article 6). The Claimant raises whether the
Court has a duty to protect the Claimant, so that the UK members state does not breach
the human rights of the Claimant.

Disproportionate Costs

32) Obviously the Claimant believes the Defendant and his lawyers are trying to
intimidated the Claimant out of his rights by what many would view as disproportionate
legal costs. Disproportionate, because of the small nature of the original claim and all
that as required was for Dr Tegwyn Williams to personally clarify, as his professional
body expects of him.

Can the Defendant (a clinician who writes how unwell the Claimant will be) Object
to or Claim Costs for an Adjournment on medical grounds?

33) The core papers mentioned by the Defendant's lawyers include in their core
correspondence reference to documents where the Defendant Dr Tegwyn Williams is
saying there is "clear evidence" of a deterioration from brain damage and/or mental
disorder, (even brain cancer) that will mean the Claimant condition will never improve
and will mean the Claimant cannot focus to deal with legal proceedings. Can either the
Defendant or his lawyer, be honest and competent, and be upholding the high standards of the profession, (or as an Officer of the Court) in asking the Court to press ahead in the absence of the Claimant on medical grounds, when they promote that the Claimant is seriously unwell?

34) The Claimant puts to the Defendant and Defendant's lawyers whether such tactics,
is conduct becoming of a doctor who instructs lawyers, or a lawyer or law firm who
should be allowed to represent any in the caring professions or the NHS.

A Challenge to Dr Tegwyn Williams to volunteer by 20 January 2011 or else a
Request For Court Order for Dr Williams to make a personal signed statement to
the Court.

35) One example of the relevance of Dr Williams voluntarily or by Court Order making a
personal signed statement is that Dr Williams can show whether or not he is obstructive
or shows bad faith, or a poor attitude towards the Claimant while the matter is before the Court, where if such occurs, the Court opportunity to, if it so wishes, determined whether it is reasonable to believe Dr Tegwyn Williams has also acted in bad faith so to causes the Claimant expense, when the Claimant attended to collect records.

a) Brain Cancer: On the Issue of the Claimant, and brain cancer, taking into account the
court transcript 2 December 2009 and for Dr Williams to also explain the prognosis of his concerns.

b) Brain damage: What records, notes and evidence exists to support Dr Williams
claims. Explain point 32 of his final 2009 report of the "Clear evidence" in the clear
evidence of brain damage and the prognosis. What exactly does Dr Tegwyn Williams
know of the evidence of physical brain damage, and if any indication and what level of
certainty of physical brain damage existing, and how does Dr Tegwyn Williams see this
as clear evidence as opposed to a potential, regards any physical condition affecting specific behaviour. How does Dr Williams judge behaviour the Claimant's behaviour compared to a leading Welsh Court Judge as below?

c) Paranoid Delusional Disorder: This issue can be a determination of facts. Did Dr
Williams have information to determine facts to decide the Claimant was delusional
about facts. Dr Williams is asked to explain notes, records, evidence facts. How and
what evidence there is that the Claimant has any such severe disorder of the mind and
particularly the prognosis taking into account that that His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn
QC says there is an unusual case with a sheer volume of incidents that require
investigation by the Court

Defendant's Lawyer's Conduct

36) The conduct of the Defendant‟s lawyer is of concern, by her repeatedly merely
asserting she gives answer, when in reality she des not. For example the Defendant's
lawyer frequently uses arguments like the Defendant is not responsible for the third
parties (organisations or people) who receive what Dr Tegwyn Williams says. When the
issue that needs to be addressed is for Dr Tegwyn Williams to clarify exactly what he
says, why and how his expressed opinion emerged or is sourced in medical records,
notes and medical evidence.

37) The Claimant's concern of whether there is bad faith by the Defendant, continues
because the Defendant's lawyers letter of 6th January 2011 not only fails to deal with
issues, but seems to the Claimant to deliberately avoid issues. Above all, whether or not
the Claimant has Brain Cancer, and if any records exist relevant to such as (but not only)
the comment in the 2 December 2009 court transcript as below, of Dr Williams saying of the Claimant's brain cancer.

The Court Transcript and Brain Cancer

38) According to Dr Tegwyn Williams' Professional body, Dr Williams should give
information to the Claimant and in a way that the Claimant can understand. That has not
been occurring ever since the Claimant was in his "care" between August and October
2009.

39) At Court on 2 December 2009, the Claimant was not present and what happens here is an odd intrusion by Dr Williams who needs to explain why he is speaking in that Court room about Mr Kirk, with Mr Kirk not there or having opportunity to rebut what he says?

40) The Claimant emphasises Dr Williams has been speaking at Court and Mr Twomlow
summarises what Dr Williams says in Dr Williams presence. Dr Williams hears the
extract below, and so stands there at Court to agree it to be true

41) The issues raised here are to ask Dr Williams to clarify what he meant by what he said to Mr Twomlow and the Court, where Dr Williams does not make small talk here but intend his professional comments about the Claimant to be taken very seriously.

42) The Court Transcript 2 December 2009 11.39am (page two) starts as if someone
inadvertently switches on the machine, saying:

i. JUDGE BIDDER:...........: ..appropriately qualified psychiatrist then the fitness to plead doesn't really arise. I have one report by you reaching a onclusion: I have another report by Dr Silva reaching a different onclusion. I can't act on the basis of that issue without there being two such reports and there aren't two such reports. In the circumstances I don't think there is a great deal of purpose in you remaining in Court.

ii. Mr TWOMLOW (CPS): May I perhaps, having spoken to Dr Williams this morning, that I think having seen the contents of Dr Silva's report he is also of the view that Mr Kirk would be fit to plead subject to the.....it was only the case of whether he has cancer or not I think that Dr Williams was concerned about, but I didn't wish to.....

43) As previously stated the Claimant believes that the Royal College of Psychiatrist
guidelines on how to deal with this kind of situation can show how reasonable or
unreasonable Dr Tegwyn Williams has acted, relevant to this claim, and so whether or
not the Court should find in favour of Claimant. Does Dr Williams now "give patients the
information they ask for or need about their condition, its treatment or prognosis" and
"give information to patients in a way they can understand"?

Give patients information in a way they can understand?

44) How is the Claimant to understand his prognosis about brain cancer or the other
condition of the brain or mind, when Dr Williams will not clarify, or disclose about
something as serious as his formally expressed comments about brain cancer?

Difficult to find a doctor who agrees With Dr Tegwyn Williams

45) As explained in more detail latter in this document, please note most doctors
(potentially nearly twenty doctors) do not seem to agree with Dr Williams on his
generally prejudicial if not defamatory tone and psychiatric diagnosis about the Claimant being mentally ill to the point of delusional about based on specific factual issue, so to question whether Dr Williams abuses his position, in giving opinion he knows (or should know) not to be true.

Additional Difficulties, Expenses and Costs

46) The Claimant wishes the Court to know that many other important Court cases have
been delayed by the defendants not clarifying the information required regards my
application for disclosure about brain cancer. The delay is also from the delay to
operations on my hip caused by non disclosure of the same information, that has I turn
caused me to remain most unwell, immobile, in fluctuating severe pain to affect
concentration, and use of morphine for an unwise duration.

47) The Claimant alleges malicious intent behind the complications from delays and
adjournments in this claim before the Court are caused from the harm and difficulties
caused by the Defendant. This includes him to block the Claimant's operation by, what
seems to the Claimant as Dr Williams unprofessional, if not dishonest opinions in Court
and in communication with his superiors, besides the non-communication with the
Claimant.

Claimant Being Absent 20 January 2011 Confirms Wish to Appeal if becomes
relevant.

48) In matters as serious as the Defendant and his lawyers acting in bad faith over brain cancer, brain damage and disorder of the mind, the Claimant who is unable to attend on 20 January 2011 is ready to go to appeal, if necessary and asks for permission, should it become relevant.

Enclosed Both UK and Breton GP letters requesting clarification

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

18th January 2011

South Wales Police Authority
Bridgend
South Wales

19th Jan 2011

Dear Sir,

Complaint against South Wales Police attempting to have me shot

1. Further to advice from the Home Office, see enclosed, I make complaint of the threat to my life caused following the erroneous information considered in the 8th June 2009 MAPPA meeting in Barry Police Station when members of South Wales Police forensic hospital. Caswell clinic attended. An internal memo, in your posession, indicationg I may be shot by police. But there was a deliberate delay of several weeks in order to obtain that opportunity before arresting a catagory MAPPA 3, terrorist level, believed to be in the possesion of one or machine guns and live ammunition..

2. I further complain of subsequent actions by Dr Tegyn Williams of Caswell Clinic and police, who, once I was arrested, had me sectioned under the 35 legislation of 1983 Mental Health Act, without even his examination, on the 22nd June2009. Their intention with the changed view of the ridiculous charges, of trading in machine guns, now unlikely to obtaining a conviction switched to some other way they interfere with the now, 19 year running damges claim for malicious prosecutions and false imprisonment.caused by the same force..

3. I further complain, following that failing, only by luck, the police attempt, on 2nd December 2009, to obtain for me a section 41 to Broadmoor , for life, without trial reliant on known fabricated evidence..

4. I further complain of ther continuing harassment and fabricated arrests ,since my release, unconvicted, since 9th February 2010 and refusal to properly investigate serious acts of criminal damage on my property and an assault on myserlf deliberately avoiding interviewing the only independant witness present

This list is not exhaustive....

yours