Search results matching tags 'Cardiff Magistrates Court' and 'Cardiff Prison'

RCJ Critical of Cardiff Crown Court Practices

Maurice — Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:19:00 GMT

http://swarb.co.uk/kirk-regina-on-the-application-of-v-cardiff-crown-court-and-others-admn-21-jan-2015/ ,,,,,,,,, http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/crown-court-breached-open-justice-with-note-taking-ban/5053531 ....................http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/government-agency-forced-intervene-after-reporter-was-barred-taking-notes-magistrates-court-first Malfeasance in a Public Office? Various Welsh Criminal Court Anomalies before The Royal Courts of Justice ................. See also further detail on both MAURICEJOHNKIRK.WORDPRESS.COM & FACE BOOK web sites............ Thomas Crowther (judge) – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia , http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/news/5000624.Barry_s__Flying_Vet__Maurice_Kirk_cleared_of_firearms_charges/ . Still more wheel nuts are coming dangerously loose on HM Partnership’s ‘gravy train’ following today’s Royal Courts of Justice ruling, handed down by Lord Justice Burnett and Mr Justice Sweeney, meaning ‘Code Napoleon’ may be here quicker than you think? . , Blatant denial in Wales, for mere mortals in their public gallery or one of Cardiff’s bullet/sound proof docks, to take notes of evidence on behalf of the police victim, is over. . . This means Her Majesty’s subjects, in Wales now, may shortly also have access to what lawyers have always had – access to hear the court tapes( CDs)-during and after trials. BUT His Lordship distinctly stated that I would continue, for the time being at least, to pay the “modest fee” charged for the transcript and things appeared different in Wales. . . In this particular Judicial Review, my 64th, it cost me over £1,200 which caused an amusing interlude in such a bizarre environment when finding myself opposing an ex Taunton School prefect, Mr Douglas-Jones QC, the CPS barrister for the Welsh Police, no less, despite being already ‘dead in the water’ fighting, rather well, a rear guard action of opposing my return of my transcript fees when reliant on undisclosed evidence of my apparent ‘conduct’ in the court below. . . Having been refused the right to apply for legal aid, eye witnesses, disclosure of custody records, the three prison officers who saw me arrest Mr Rogan in Cardiff prison, for withholding my passport on police orders, copy from any one of the seven CCTV cameras also recording the very hilarious event, my ‘conduct’ in the court below was just routine. . . I Cardiff criminal courts you are invariably denied your legal papers in the court room and if a prisoner you are not even allowed to take them off the prison wing. . . That day, in Cardiff’s Crown Court, before HHJ Crowther QC, I could neither see nor hear much of what was going as my hearing aid had been pinched from my cell, my glasses secreted in in my legal papers, at the foot of the court stairs, hoping to get at the file and compounded by the discomfort from temporary haemorrhoids caused by so much legal data having to be regularly stuffed up my rectum. . . I was was quickly stopped, more than once, by Their Lordships from enquiring as to what evidence of so called prisoner ‘conduct’ did the CPS refer and by whom did this HM barrister obtain such allegations if not from the South Wales Police? A touch of the re run, I thought, of Downing Street’s HM Privy Council/ RCVS Deja vu? This will be the next HM ‘cosey relationship’ within our South Wales Police/HM Judges/HM Crown Prosecution Service/HM Court and Tribunal Service needing to be quashed AND maybe, without even the need to cross the Severn Bridge! 16 02 04 RCJ note jugment 16 02 08 note taking CO042492014-Final Order His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, in my protracted actions against the South Wales Police for over 20 years of malicious prosecutions, has granted time for the production of further evidence of: An over arching course of conduct of police misfeasance in a public office My right in exposing Barbara Wilding’s ‘shoot to kill’ intention, following her clandestine 8th June 2009 Barry police station’s meeting, to have me registered MAPPA level 3 category 3, has been thwarted by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC this week. The MAPPA meeting had consisted only of senior police management and her chief forensic psychiatrist, Dr Tegwyn Williams, with his psychiatric nurse, Ms Elizabeth Paul both of Caswell Clinic’s medium secure psychiatric unit housed in Glanrhydd Hospital, Bridgend, South Wales. The then Chief Constable had blackmailed Dr Tegwyn Williams to concoct NHS (Wales) medical reports to have her adversary in court, claiming damages, to be locked away, hopefully indefinitely, in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital without any need for the ‘machine gun’ trial. '' . . WANTED Dr Tegwyn Williams WANTED poster ' ' Machine Gun Case one page summary ' . 14 01 23 HMP Swansea Brain Scan . . No evidence of Dr Tegwyn William s diagnosis of ‘significant brain damage’ or Crown Prosecutor Richard Thomlow’s pleading for MAPPA 3/3 victim be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Hospital, with possible brain tumour, indefinitely. . . Mr Thomlow is now a Welsh judge, incidentally, which must signify the obvious while Dr Tegwyn Williams was sacked from the NHS for what he has done and now down in Christchurch, New Zealand, I last heard. . . .I have personal experiences of NZ police, in my jaunt around that great place, in Liberty Girl, that lost more per capita than any other HM King George Country in WW2, …..Yes, I was stopped by NZ police for various mischievous allegations, BUT always with a smile! I wish Dr TW and wife well as they will not be black-mailed by that police force, for sure This then flurry of mine, of futile activity ‘with authority’, was entirely my mistake on the huge assumption I would get their help, after Barbara Wilding had to falsify a court affidavit confirming FULL DISCLOSURE had been completed: MG Trigger MAPPA Restricted.

Criminal Cases Review Commission receive more 'New Evidence' in Three Cardiff Crown Court Mis-trials

Maurice — Sun, 11 Oct 2015 17:12:00 GMT

Breaking News ‘Breached’ Restraining Order never ever was served on their victim in the first place!--------- Their Lordships’ March 1013 judgment has been located to reveal, in paragraph 9, they were never aware of a ‘jury note’, as with the victim, specifically asking Judge Paul Thomas QC, on 4th May 2012, for 1st December 2011 Cardiff clerk of the court’s court file re ‘harassment of a doctor’ conviction.--------- . His Honour, apparently, in the police victim’s forced absence for urgent medical attention, was informed by the HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) there were no court records available relevant to the jury’s wishing to see proof after the gaoler had specifically admitted, but only on cross examination, Geoamy had no record either of any ‘service’ in the cells by them. So just who did then?---------. It has only just been established, via Bristol solicitors and the Criminal Cases Review Commission, when the latter seized the court file in February 2012, that there was no record at all in either the clerk’s contemporaneous notes or court log either.--------. Police records of their victim’s ‘gate arrest’, immediately after his 1st Dec 2011 release, show no evidence either of a ‘restraining order’ was ever served. Their blackmailed police psychiatrist, made to fabricate psychiatric reports to scupper their victim’s long running damages claims of police bullying, harassment, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments, was soon sacked from NHS (Wales). Their victim has served six prison terms so far, over this, totalling well over three years of his life. . . The Manager Crown Court Cardiff 5th Oct 2015 Dear Sir, DPP V MAURICE JOHN KIRK BVSc – APPLICATION UNDER PART 5.7(2)(A)(B) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2014 I write to request to be supplied with copies of all documents that are retained on the court file in respect of my 1st Dec 2011 harassment conviction, on appeal and heard at your court on 1st March 2012, under Part 5.7(2)(a)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2014 and any other relevant rule of law. I refer you to the case of R (Guardian New & Media Ltd.) v. City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court (2012) EWCA Civ 420; [2013] 1 W.L.R. 618 dealing with the right to obtain copies of documents used in court cases, along with Part 5 of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2015 and Practice Direction. You will note that there is a presumption in favour of such disclosure in the interests of “open justice” as was voiced by subsequent judges, seized with the matter, in both your building and one in England. I therefore look forward to receiving the court’s decision in relation to my requests under the Criminal Procedure Rules 2014 at your earliest kind convenience. Yours faithfully Maurice John Kirk BVSc

Another Frustrating Day in our Parliament Building

Maurice — Wed, 24 Jun 2015 06:13:00 GMT

Busy day for me, yesterday, in Parliament committee rooms- First there was 'child abuse' meeting and then 'whistle blower' almost a riot of over a hundred fearful followers and victims as persecuted 'whistle blowers'. Then, if not sublime to the ridiculous, in the very same room was NOMS with entourage including the new Justice Minister, Mr Michael Gove.......the discussion covered lawyer greed , would you believe? . . No Sabine K McNeil there, alas, of Victims Unite.com.etc . So, what are you lot out there going to do about her current predicament as the 'Queen Bee' on so many disputed issues in our current out dated UK judicial system?.. , BUT first we had an organised demo outside that building, Royal Courts of Justice, for Sabine, one of the original brains at Cern in the 70s who created that nebulous thing none of you can touch....cyberspace. SO, what are you going to do? . Sabine K McNeill (@SabineMcNeill) | Twitter . See More later

Please find me a lawyer I can trust

Maurice — Thu, 28 May 2015 06:23:00 GMT

Please help as I am currently trawling through London lawyers again for forteen valid torts following yet another South Wales Police 'stitch up' for fear of their pensions. In a way the 'machine gun' case needed to have been lost as none of this then needed to be concocted. Role on the day for Welsh judicial autonomy and its own well deserved police force!

15 05 28 BS Medical Update R.pdf

Emergency Application to His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

Maurice — Sun, 28 Jul 2013 13:22:00 GMT

13 07 28 Emergency Aplication re Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police BS614159.pdf

13 07 28 MJK Statement of Truth.pdf

13 07 29 MJK Statement.pdf

Bristol Solicitor Instructions

13 07 30 MJK Instructions.pdf

http://mckenzie-friends.co.uk/

Let us not forget the lucrative child snatching industry, no doubt yet another of Blair's wicked schemes to bleed the unsuspecting taxpayer of their right for a peaceful existance

Visit, today, to Melissa Laird in Holloway prison fighting extradition, without snatched son...... will your child be next?

Maria, Moi et Sabine

WITHIN HOURS I am back in gaol and Melissa bundled out of the Country and deported to US

Maurice invited to compete in Schneider Trophy above Alderney but only if G-KURK WW2 Piper Cub is ready?

Now I need some quick piece of transport...ah my CBR 600..ideal!

Keith Vaz MP & Welsh Judiciary Fudge NHS Control over their own Doctors to Block GMC Investigation

Maurice — Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:14:00 GMT

MY BRIEF EXPLANATION FOR WELSH AUTHORITIES NHS & MAPPA EXTREME CONDUCT

Associated videos to this epic 'Flight to Australia', 'without a map', suffering 'significant brain damage' and suspect brain tumour, led to the unlawful sectioning, under the 1983 Mental Health Act, of the pilot, 'trading in machine guns', by several NHS (Wales) employees, all guarrenteed imunity to prosecution by MAPPA and eleven Cardiff Crown Court judges, sum up the plans by the Welsh Authorities for YOU or any anyone else who dares challenge the 'New World Order'.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2yLlBunsrc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JVFh-AoHiU

12 12 31 CPS Dicken re RCJ Appeal.pdf

12 12 31 IPCC Vaz.pdf

This early 'draft'was handed to my Mackenzie Friend in the 3rd May12 jury trial from wicked CPS barrister David Garath Evans who continues to produce the written over 'draft' by the eaqually wicked Judge John Charles in front of a host of my helpers in the public gallery

11 12 01 RO CPS Draft REDACTED.pdf

12 12 21 CPS Dicken RO.pdf

12 10 21 Restraining Order WitnessStatement REDACTED.doc

12 07 13 CARDIFF POLICE STATEMENT.doc,

The point is that neither the police Caswell Clinic psychiatrist nor psychologist Professor Wood are medically qualified to interpret a CT brain scan as that is the role of the neuro-radiologist who has training and qualifications so to do.

All the neuro radiologists that examined the scans contradict the psychiatrist’s findings but still he went ahead and applied that I be sectioned IPP to Ashworth, ‘imprisonment for public protection’ with the full support of MAPPA

On 2^nd December 2009 in Cardiff Crown Court the prosecution, police psychiatrist and court of were all in receipt of my privately funded specialist report faxed the day before. Only achievedm incidentally, by the quick thinking Walter Sweeney, ex MP for the Vale of Glamorgan and his lovely wife, Nuala, a leading consultant radioligist in South East Yorkshire.

No one would allow it to be referred to as seen on the transcript overlooked to be destroyed at the time.

9 12 1 medical Kemp.pdf

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/_A300_100_2C00_000-Machine-Gun-Reward.aspx quickly repainted by police but failed to fool the jury

Machine Gun Indictment.pdf Carrying a Mandatory 10 year prison sentance and by now the South Wales Police had painted the machine gun a different colour to try and fool the jury

Likewise, someone stupidly forgot to 'corrupt' the tape before transcription....a common game for distorting the truth to fool the public

09 12 17 Court Hearing to Extend IPP.pdf

However, there is the built in provision in the Act that you cannot be prosecuted 'for a course of conduct' when attempting 'to prevent or detect (further ) crime'.....the very purpose of distributed WANTED posters. A further procaution was taken to get no less than severn police officers to examine the posters for adverse comment whilst they were being distributed. Of course I was refused any of them as witnesses

The CPS, on 1st December, produced various drafts of a 'Restraining Order' producing the following but still not disclosing the one now needed, of course, for the Criminal Court of Appeal, very shortly, the part hand written draft brought waved under my nose, in my cell, by that GEOamey guard, the lying little Lee Barker who's statement completely contradicted that of the only other tamed witness in a corridoe of six eager on lookers!

THE 1997 HARASSMENT ACT is a typically knee jerk written piece of legislation, of the Blair era, now being abused just to lock up those exposing the crimes going on daily in our welsh law courts.

Anticipating the continuing conduct of the Welsh courts, to protect their very own NHS's conduct in a similar manner to the way they had so far protected their police force, irrespective of the facts, I quietly lobbed into their cess pit of deceipt, rather like a Mills bomb into the mill pool for trout, a petty debt £840 claim for bus fares and time wasted, travelling backwards and forwards countless times to Caswell Clinic, when originally promised my medical records used on 2nd December 09 to have me sent to Ashworth. That claim, as predicted, to prevent the doctor having the risk of committing perjury, was settled out of court to the cost to the tax payer well in excess of £20,000.

There then followed the substantive claims before the final one due on 30th January 2013 at the hearingr to consolidate with the eight or so police claims:

10 06 07 One Million Pound Claim against NHS (Wales)_only R.pdf

12 12 04 SWP High Court Consolidation Application - REDACTED.doc

WHY IS THIS MAN 'ON THE SICK' BUT REPRESENTED BY MORGAN COLE WHO ACT FOR NHS (WALES)?

it stinks, doesn't it?

http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/ipcc-receives-631-corruption-allegation-complaints-about-welsh-police-forces/

LATEST NHS & POLICE RESPONSE (Crime Reference number 62126415504 reported 16.45 hrs 28th Dec 2012)

12 12 13 NHS Rebuttal Restraining Order Variation_0001.pdf

12 12 30 MJK NHS reponse to 13th letter.doc

At my 20^th December 2012 magistrate’s application, to be able to see my South Wales doctor, this 13^th December Morgan Cole document was, without me knowing, already with both District Judge Bodfan Jenkins and CPS Mr Dicken, the latter summoned to represent Her Majesty.

All four parties, the NHS, the protected rogue doctor, scheming judge and bewildered CPS ALL blocked the progress of the case by pre arranging yet another adjournment, a game they have played now for over a year…...anything to cover up the truth.

Like wise, Bodfan Jenkins, an old hand at perverting the course of justice, held back the clerk of the court’s notes of the May 12 ‘shooting walking stick’ hearing following my repeated attempts to have my totally legal property returned by the police following their 2009 ‘machine gun’ house raid fiasco.

The case was adjourned, far too embarrassing for a public arena. My medical care will have wait until their conclusion at 22^nd January hearing!!!…….. come, witness and inhale their stench

The ‘walking stick shot gun case lingers on a ‘case stated’ application forcing the same judge to release the court’s notes indicating it had statements from both police and my then wife , none of which I knew about during the 2010 ‘machine gun’ jury trial, indicating a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice

So what? The South Wales Police are past masters at distorting the truth.

Letter to GMC:

I emphasize that in writing my psychiatric reports Dr ******** was unduly influenced by the South Wales Police to report that I was suffering mental health problems resulting from ‘significant’ brain damage and that in coming to such a conclusion Dr ******** deliberately ignored reports from properly qualified radiologists stating that my brain scan was normal for a man of my age.

Instead the doctor sought out the advice of a clinical psychologist researcher who was not qualified to interpret such scans (and who was not made aware of the radiologists reports) and then moved beyond even this advice to tell numerous courts on the basis of no evidence whatsoever that I had suspected brain cancer.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

enclosed

09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans.pdf

None of these named three Caswell Clinic and Princess of Wales doctors were allowed in any of my Harassment or Restraining Order hearing

Caswell Clinic Medical Records Leak REDACTED rcds

Caswell Clinic Medical Records Leak REDACTED.pdf

BRISTOL RADIO INTERVIEW

http://bcfm.org.uk/category/shows/dialect-radio

[DOWNLOAD & skip first 4min 30 sec of this 14th Dec 12 Broadcast]

NEXT Bristol Broadcast shortly.......if not 'pulled'

None of these named three Caswell Clinic and Princess of Wales doctors were allowed in any of my Harassment or Restraining Order hearings

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

10 10 17 GMC Wales complaint REDACTED.doc

12 09 19 GMC Briefing REDACTED.pdf

09 09 03 MG Trans Redacted.pdf

11 01 05 GMC close to Mr Kirk.doc

http://www.gmc-uk.org/concerns/making_a_complaint/3841.asp

03 07 23 HM Attorney General Steps In.pdf

As the Cardiff Cabal dictate the instructions to your own lawyer's and whose turn it is to win, in the stench of their courts, this further futile jesture may amuse or annoy the occasional reader?

Hearing date 30th January 2013

12 12 04 SWP High Court Consolidation Application REDACTED.doc

The three month trial, for first three of eight or nine Actions against the South Wales Police, starts on 18th February all based on police being allowed to refuse to disclose their records and identity of all witnesses at each of the forty odd incidents of police bullying.

I started this retaliation 20 years ago in Bristolbut then transferred to Wales where the first thing the little bast**ds did was to refuse me a jury.

Each time the trial was listed, ever since, the same bunch of evil Welsh had me locked me up, for months at a time, on a string of fabricated charges dependant, of course, on a string of very corrupt judges in both Cardiff Crown and magistrates courts and wicked forensic psychiatrist

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

and a wee missive from down under.......

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

PANACEA is "an answer or solution for all problems or difficulties ... via Latin from Greek panakeia healing everything, from pan all + akēs remedy".and that's certainly the case for all our problems and injustices here in Australia (& Old South Wales) where we are regarded as Slaves by the Thieves and Traitors, ie: the Banks and Judges, who rule our country because of our ignorance of MAGNA CARTA and gutlessness to fight the evil-doers.When MAGNA CARTA says: "No free man shall be taken indeed imprisoned, or exiled or outlawed, or dispossessed or destroyed in any way, nor shall we pass over him nor send over him unless by the lawful judgment of his equals which is the law of the land", and the Thieves and Traitors continue to steal and kill and destroy unimpeded, then Hosea 4: 6 is 100% correct by saying "People are destroyed for the lack of knowledge".Thomas Jefferson said, "If the people do not know how to govern themselves, then educate them"..... which brings me to the attachment annexed hereto and called "COURTS ARE GOVERNMENT".Robert Balgarnie of Inverell, told me years ago, "We're living in a 5-star prison" and "Nothing is going to change because we're no hurting enough, yet".Educating the People of Australia is a difficult task .. especially against all the lies and propaganda the Thieves and Traitors churn out.It's going to take M-O-N-E-Y........ BIG M-O-N-E-Y.Does anyone know of a PHILANTHROPIC PATRIOT ....... anyone?????If there is such a MAN or WOMAN, perhaps they might like to read the "AIMS and OBJECTIVES" of the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY at http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/pdf/ACLP%20Constitution001.pdf saying: “3.1 To ensure that the Commonwealth of Australia remains a Common Law Jurisdiction with Sovereignty belonging to the Australian People who will always be able to exercise their inalienable Right to Trial by Jury in Australian Courts for the administration of Justice, the advancement of Truth, the effective implementation of Democracy and the preservation of Liberty. 3.2 To seek the teaching of the fundamental principles of Common Law throughout the schools and universities of Australia that Common Law is indeed the Law of the People, by the People and for the People. 3.3 To ensure that Grand Juries operate for the investigation of serious offences and of the maladministration of government and the finding of true Bills of Indictment to go to Petit Juries who will judge the facts and the laws presented to them in those particular actions and that Grand and Petit Juries be unimpeded in their inquisitorial role and the full execution of their authority to question and call for witnesses and to determine the admissibility of evidence.3.4 To endorse and support candidates for election to all levels of government in Australia in order to achieve the above Aims and Objectives.”Politicians are either ego-trippers or stooges for the "vested interest groups" (to put it politely).... and our Parliaments are definitely not acting in our best interests, in the spirit of "For we are young and free".Therefore, there is an URGENT and DESPERATE NEED to put these characters in their place. Unless we can firmly establish DEMOCRACY OVER BUREAUCRACY, ie: the PEOPLE having SOVEREIGNTY, then we really are NOTHING but SLAVES and we commit our CHILDREN to that ever-worsening state. Yours sincerely,John Wilson.Chairman, Australian Common Law Party. PS: SUPPORT & FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS: Firstly, there’s no better way to pitch in than to join the Party. There are no Membership Fees. See: http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/html/aclp.html Secondly, spread the word that the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY is now upon the scene. The word is: solutions to all our problems lie within ourselves. Thirdly, send donations to the BENDIGO BANK, 198 Macquarie Street, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia, where our account is: Account name: AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY. BSB: 633-000 and Account number: 143521896. For overseas deposits SWIFT No./Code: BENDAU 3B.

http://victims-unite.net/our-cases-as-stories/violent-physical-attacks/maurice-kirk/

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/lnmrn/2012/12/28/the-horokane-hour-hosted-by-dr-len-

Michael Docherty's US interview on 'Harassment Act' remakably 'deja vu'!!!!!

Cardiff County Court Hearing re Doctor 30^th January 2013

There is an outstanding civil damages claim surrounding police operation, ‘Operation Chalice’ and a ‘machine gun’ I once owned attached to my aircraft. The armed police raid, backed by helicopter, on the marital home on 22^nd June 2009, marked the date of our marital separation. Witnesses present are reluctant to disclose any information always needed. That includes witness identification, copy of all statements taken and substance of all conversations and how and when the house search was carried out etc My daughter was again at risk, under police code name ‘Operation Orchid’, to ‘snatch her by Social Services. It is MAPPA and a rogue forensic psychiatrist that caused, if you wish to believe a word of it, added reasons given and accepted in court, as to why I was not to be released for nearly eight months and in return sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act.

Cardiff Magistrates Court Proceedings Buried

The case relates to a purported ‘shooting walking stick shot gun’ obtained by the police, nearly a year later, from the marital home, during my January 2010 ‘machine gun’ trial at Cardiff but with no witness statements taken. None of this information came to my notice until three years later and only by my court applications to make the police disclose relevant evidence.

Application to Vary Restraining Order continues 22nd January 2013.....as farcical as the previous nonsense

MEAN WHILE THIS IS IGNORED

IPCC Refs 2099/0116588 & 2012/001471

Cardiff Wales

CF3 5EA

5th November 2012

Dear Sir,

Re More South Wales Police Bullying

Further to my ongoing complaint please note the latest complaints, enclosed, of at least several more examples of criminal conduct being occasioned:

South Wales Police cross to England to influence a witness that has caused my name being removed from the veterinary register and receive a criminal conviction.

Enclosed website blog with one 27th Oct 12 statement agreed and signed by Christopher Paul ALEXANDER originally MR EBBS and witnessed by several people.

. 2nd Nov 2010 conviction of common assault fabricated to use to oppose bail over a two year period only for it to be then withdrawn police never ever having intended to fight my appeal as the two year use of successfully opposing my bail had served its purpose..

Enclosed as a summary from my current website blog simply to indicate the extreme length Cardiff judges are now actively supporting their own police force’s criminal conduct

False imprisonment re 2^nd allegation of Breach of a Restraining Order from approx 21st Sept 2012 imprisonment for nearly 3 months on evidence later withdrawn as the police knew full well my action to fax a pre action protocol draft witness summons to Caswell Clinic was lawful.

My request for the MAPPA fabricated withheld medical evidence, used by police, CPS and rogue doctor, to apply for my transfer to Ashworth Psychiatric prison on 2nd Dec 2009, requires immediate disclosure in order I may apply to be put back on the veterinary register and for me to be eligible to update my professional flying licences.

Please do not allow this new evidence slow down you outstanding investigations of 'shoot to kill policy, 'machine gun' malicious prosecution and the falsification and maladministration of my being registered a MAPPA level 3 victim. Just when will you instruct an outside police force?

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Bristol Prison Release for Private Arrest, Freedom of Expression and Sunday Telegraph's Musa Snatched Children Update

Maurice — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:55:00 GMT

Well, Not Just Yet.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/around_the_world/picture44.aspx

[7th Draft posted on web site missing links (magistrate and Royal Courts of Justice tape & video recordings and other ‘WANTED’ posters etc to be added over next few days] STOP PRESS They worked perfectly well in Brittany, France this summer when, editing was being sorted but U Tube appears blocked/censored in UK....(Someone's fascinating U -Tube footage, of my last Criminal Court of Appeal hearing, over these falsified MAPPA medical records, works in Eire, apparently, a little bird tells me).

And where is the Element of Harassment in This?

The State rely on one or more of the following four phases to eliminate the risk of any exposure as to 'what really goes on in our Britsh law courts':

1. simply ignore, in the hope the dissident will simply tire and go away or

2. ridicule and financially ruin, by manipulation of the media and if that fails,

3. play the 'Gulag card', by having the victim sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act and even if that can not be achieved repeat what

4. Stalin, Hitler did and South Wales Police tried so hard to do, have him shot.

The above 'Wanted' poster was handed in, by me, to the Cardiff police station during my detailed complaint of the South Wales Police's 'shoot to kill policy' following His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers' 2008 Court Order requiring Dolmans', solicitors, client, the Chief Constable, to disclose sensitive evidence.

It surrounded some fifty or so incidents of police bullying and 24/7 MAPPA level 3, at level 3 supervision, whilst I was simply attempting to practice veterinary surgery in South Wales.

This 'Wanted' poster is of particular interest as District Judge John Charles, in Cardiff Magistrates, had ruled that it did NOT constitute harassment, when distributed amongst the general public, as part of a 'course of conduct' under the 1997 Act.

I had already been sectioned for Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison and diagnosed as having 'significant brain damage, suffering from a 'paranoid delusional disorder' in the fixated belief I was being persecuted by the South Wales Police.

Well, perish the thought!

Despite my being deemed so ill, a court appointed solicitor having had to 'act ' on my behalf, the district judge openly allowed the prosecution to tamper with the alreadily obvious dubious evidence.

Our Queen's Representative, HM Crown Prosecutor barrister David Gareth Evans, at the closing stages of this typically run Cardiff court, the defendant being refused neither right to cross examine nor have access to his legal papers and witnesses, even attempted to switch this particular poster for the previously deliberately presented one, Wanted Dead or Alive' to cause maximum effect.

A copy of which was also slipped in, at the very last moment, as 'posted' to the Caswell Clinic by me when, only after access to the court exhibit and franked envelope, in the March 2012 Crown Court appeal was it obvious that the clinic, itself , had 'posted' it.

If it can be proved the complainant, a seasoned forensic level 12 psychiatrist, was either telephoned or had posted to him 'some ' act of harassment' by the accused only then can this accused be jailed for the 'offence', as on the charge sheet.

The police had overlooked this legal requirement, until after the trial had started!

This meant district judge Charles had to re arrange the usual Recorder of Cardiff's pre arranged Court High Court Orders from His Honour Judge Christopher Llewellin Jones QC, for uncontrolled dissidents, exactly as his predecessors, Mr Justice Nicholas Cooke QC had done for him in the 2009 'machine gun' trial to obtain the subsequent 'contempt of court' further imprisonment thus avoiding the embarassing release of my NHS medical records so relied on by MAPPA, CAA and RCVS.

This time, though, it was by expediting proceedings to convict but by 'retrospective incarceration' that now meant the failure of any 'restaining order' being served as I had neither attended the remaining hours of a court fiasco nor was I returned to prison where HM Probation Service would have, in any other UK prison, taken over.

HM Probation Service and its Offender Management Unit, of course, could not be involved because they had already been specifically locked out of the original IAG and MAPPA meetings in 2009 when NHS Caswell Clinic monthly meetings had taken place in attempts in having me silenced, IPP, following the police's June 2009 failed attempts in having me shot.

Only when I was transferred to my long awaited English prison, in HMP Bristol, in this late September, did I receive my first ever visit by Probation's OMU, re the implications and statutory requirements surrounding police allegations and contrived convictions under, albeit much badlly drafted and misused 1997 Harassment Act.

All UK courts and prisons, while handling MAPPA or 'Restraining Order' victims, are obliged by law to have informed their prisoner of his or her legal responsibilities unless, of course, there is some other demonic 'ultra vires' agenda.

Cardiff HM Prison food verses Bristol HM Prison food……I really must write that book, some time, ‘Maurice’s Guide to HMP Cuisine’.

But on to more serious issues…..

As an aperitif,

Summary of my Defence Statements Refused at 1st December 2011 Cardiff Magistrates, 1st March 2012 Appeal & 2nd May Jury Trial

CPS (Wales) falsified the facts, before open court on 1st December 2011, by alleging I had sent a Wanted poster to a victim by post.

The 2nd March 12 Crown Court Appeal, [transcripts on previous blogs], despite my disclosing the purported offending letter, a prosecution exhibit no less, had been sent by the Post Office, not a member of the public, bearing its own franking, with HHJ again Hughes refusing my exposing its exact audit trail within the NHS(Wales) stitch up or allow me witnesses.

The court also heard how the CPS had, by slight of hand, switched the 'wanted posters, part way through the original 1st Dec 11 fiasco before tha, thoroughly corrupt District Judge John Charles.

Charles , one breath before, was heard to mumble to CPS barrister Evans,, but picked up by me behind the bullet proof glass, the 3rd incident had been only slotted in that very morning in order for a custodial sentance could be handed down. also the judge blocked the CPS barrister for substiting another variation Wanted poster as interpreted as anc of 'harassment' the lawyer having deliberately misled the court in which was actually haNDED IN BY ME, AT THE CENTRAL POLICE STATION, when filing statements of complaint on the falsified machine gun repainting and senior police orders to allow temporary 'shoot to kill policy'.

The tape/ videos of Cardiff court proceedings await High Court appraisal or after my third arrest and incarceration for alleged breach of a restraining order never served.

Protection from Harassment Act 1997

(This is an edited version of the Act prepared for www.HarassmentLaw.co.uk. It excludes the provisions applying to Scotland and incorporates s7(3A) added to the Act by s44 Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 and other amendments made by s125 Serious and Organised Crime Act 2005. The Protection from Harassment Act came into force on 16th June 1997, Sections 3(3) to 3(9 ) came into force on 1st September 1998, Section 7(3A) came into force on 1st August 2001 and ss1(1A), 3A and 7(5) came into force on 1st July 1 2005. The full Act as originally passed in 1997 is available on the HMSO Website. )

An Act to make provision for protecting persons from harassment and similar conduct.

s1 Prohibition of harassment.

(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct-

(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and

(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

(1A) A person must not pursue a course of conduct -
(a) which involves harassment of two or more persons, and
(b) which he knows or ought to know involves harassment of those persons, and
(c) by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not one of those mentioned above)-
(i) not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or
(ii) to do something that he is not under any obligation to do

(2) For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to or involves harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to or involved harassment of the other.

(3) Subsection (1) or (1A) does not apply to a course of conduct if the person who pursued it shows-

(a) that it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,

(b) that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or

Criminal Court of Appeal Judgment Dismissing My Application to Appeal the Prison Convictions for 'Harassment' and 'Breach of a Restraining Order' Never Served

MY GROUNDS

These were hurriedly lodged with the Criminal Cout of the Appeal WITHOUT the assistance of witness and Judges' Summing Up (I was absent) now ordered for this blog.

12 05 29 Criminal Court of Appeal GROUNDS BLOG.pdf

i) But he jury was handed a piece of paper, marked 'restraining order', with a date stamp 9th December 2011. His Honour Judge Christopher Llewelln Jones QC's, 14th November 2011 orders, while sitting as The Recorder of Cardiff, even before the case had hardly started, had given District Judge John Charles instructions 'when sentance takes place' blocking my right to cross examine any of the police witnesses!

ii) The restraining order was never served as the GEOamy Custody Services/Cardiff Magistrate conspiracy , partly set out below, clearly portrays.

iii) No one ever served on me or showed me the alleged 'offending' blog posting article and I suspect the jury did not see it either.

If it did once exist then why was it not listed as an exhibit or was it because it may have been created in my home in Brittany, a foriegn jurisdiction, making what ever it was possibly ultra vires?

I am urgently looking for an independant trustworthy London barrister to act for me on this matter as an oral hearing, at the Royal Courts of Justice, has just been granted.

My number is 07907937953

Thankyou

A sample of what the Cardiff Cabal gets up to , on a quiet day

Dolmans, solicitors, Cardiff, South Wales Police solictors defending a number of my civil damages claims are using HM for protection Leaked HM Internal Memos.pdf and so double their costs bill . My countless Actions are for malicious prosecutions and false imprisonment an ignored His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC's Court Order, to release their witness statement, below, deliberately concocted to having me jailed in 2009 by Imprisonment for Public Protection, IPP, without trial.

My first three Actions, to be heard in January, include the following motoring incidents 09_5_19 MAURICE KIRK MOTORING SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf apart from such things as police break ins to my veterinary surgery , high speed aircraft chases by the police helicopter and being accused of smuggling pigs in from Ireland into some Vale of Glamorgan farmer's field!

Oliver Esq and Maurice after a 'good night' looking for pigs, perhaps?

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/maurices_picks/Maurice-with-pal-Oliver-Reed.aspx

Oliver Reed Esq and Maurice in a County Cork farmer's field

As the then 2009 date, for the three month civil trial, loomed before us, needing over one hundred police officers and Cardiff court staff to defend it, much Cardiff Cabal scheming intensified.

But His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC , in 2008, following my fifteen years of near futile disclosure applications and refusals by Cardiff's criminal courts , ordered disclosure having already ordered a jury trial!!

But 'HM Partnership' soon over turned all his court orders.

This latest but dramatic implosion and chaos from within both our current judicial and penal systems is based, of course, on the ridiculous but out dated ever changing anomaly for the tax payer to pay for.

The lucrative cartel for passengers on the HM 'gravy train', fuelled by 'Her Majesty's Prerogative' for HM judge's 'discretion', 'Memorandum of Understanding' and other out dated anomilies, give rise to the participant's immunity to criminal and in some cases, civil proceedings against them if linked to a 'Royal Charter'.

Many will remember the remarkable Suzon Forscey-Moore who has left a few key documents with us and demonstrates her excellent research

06-09-11-suzon-forscey-moore.pdf

For we mere mortals, simply looking for 'justce' in a UK court, again reminds me of that circa 1990 'off the record' bit of advice I should of taken! 'Justice is only a man made concept', Mr Justice Blom -Cooper QC had affectionaterly suggested whilst exiting, at speed, Guernsey's notorious Royal Court building, beating a fast path for the airport and back to relative RCJ sanity.

In order to succeed in sueing the police I needed, for example, their 'incident' or 'occurrence'' numbers each time I was stopped, names and collar numbers of police involved and witnesses at the scene only known to the police. These would undermine either their criminal prosecution or, as now defendants, my civil case. In your dreams, Maurice!

If the police, Cardiff CPS or or court judges could prevaricate long enough , before dropping all charges, long enough to maximise financial damage and making it too late to trace culprit identity and or independant witnesses, any form of civil redress was near pointless.

My current 90% success rate in having some 160 allegations withdrawn, quashed or won on appeals would of been significantly higher had I been before a totally honest HM Crown Prosecution Service, CPS and line up of judges, each time.

On the balance of probabilities any conviction will succeed, if tried enough times, for the judge is, at the end of the day, only human and must make a decisionso often in the arena with failed police disclosure swaying the odds.

The problem is always much worse when the judge fails to understand the reason for the failed disclosure as the 'defendant' in a Cardiff court is doomed if he is forced to explain the reason for the need of police disclosure as it informs the enemy of its existance and chance to have it destoyed.

It is always a sort of 'game' by Cardiff's cabal to withhold, for as long as possible, evidence that would collapse the prosecutions case. It is nigh impossible to get any disclosure the moment it is decided the CPS is not going to run with the case.

Time and time again , over twenty years, it has turned out that prosecution cases were stopped months before I was told or stretched to maximise the financial costs on bothe sides.

The real killer for a defendant, like this week for example, over the latest MAPPA/Dolmans cover up under the guise of a 'Breach of a Restraining Order' never even served on me, when playing with indictable offences, once you get refused bail and the case is dropped you are buggered.

In just a few days, 11th October, the mangement or trial by jury judge had ordered PACE Act disclosure when you may have prevented the police paper shredder from doing over time.

You are very, very lucky to get any of it after that date, if the case is dropped.

I needed immediate bail granted, in the Bristol Crown court , last month, or to stay in jail up until 11th October, to obtain the police controlled evidence for civil damages claim in the hope some recovery of the huge losses can be achieved.

09 06 20 SWP Dolmans MG 11.pdf

This had quickly followed hurriedly convened but clandestine 1st and 8th June MAPPA meetings held in Police HQ and Barry police station with the remainder, for the year, al being convened but as with the first, not of a plenary nature as laid down by statute.

It was my court service of paperwork on the three Defendants, the Chief Constable, HM Attorney General and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS), following the falsified February 09 Barbara Wilding sworn witness statement was drafted by Dolmans and withheld, contrary to His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC's precise orders.

To take on any HM department and dare challenge Her Majesty's prerogative and any of those attached like lice or hidden within the pleats, all immune to prosecution was, in effect, sounding my death warrant.

As dear Gerald and Yvonne Gillow, of notorious Guernsey fame and European Court successes, before it was also corrupted, used an apt expression, 'invincible prejudice' when summing up our so corrupt and fundimentally flawed UK justice system.

However, my subsequent legal action, no lawyer would assist, for the 15th June 09 Judicial Review Application, sparked the sudden frenzy in South Wales and Whitehall over mythical machine guns, my MAPPA registration and malevolent Masonic manoeuvres to drive a shrink to deliberately falsify my medical notes.

With HM Whitehall named, having been steeped in years of work from the Cardiff County Court, also trying to stop my actions against the police, have me almost registered as a 'vexatious litigant' with the RCVS, at best, getting a two year Civil Restraint Order, anything to stop 'disclosure of their respective HM damming evidence, to have me struck off for the Cardiff Authorities.

The next document is a summary, mainly pre South Wales with South Wales Police influence, perhaps, starting after: Page 28 and paragraph 347 onwards

09 06 19 SWP Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirk final.pdf

And for the Entree

It never ceases to amaze me as to the extreme lengths to which the Welsh judiciary are prepared to stoop, whilst wallowing in their cess pit of depravity flavoured with intrigue, corruption and bitterness always trying, it seems, to alienate all foreigners just to protect one of their own in their tribe.

Nine Cardiff Crown Court judges, for example, back in 2009 over the‘machine gun’ debacle, while I was incarcerated in NHS Caswell Clinic and Cardiff prison for nearly a year, all kept me locked up by pretending or otherwise to accept a rogue ‘psychiatric’ report, prepared by the South Wales Police or their lawyer, Adrian Oliver of Dolmans, for MAPPA level 3 supervision and to have me sectioned to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric prison, IPP, for life.

One of the nine Cardiff judges accepting the conspiracy:

Paul Thomas QC WANTED1[1].pdf

My near twenty year running civil damages claims start with the first three of seven in January 2013 for about three months. Some hundred or so police will be cross examined over having me bullied, struck off the veterinary register and falsly imprisoned, time and time again when reliant on an uttterly corrupt Cardiff judiciary

ALL WELCOME .....tea and biscuits in the intervals, daily nonsences guaranteed to mimic the ridiculous farce of some forty or fifty previously fixed Cardiff court cases I have had to endure and pay for.

“Significant brain damage” and a 'possible brain tumour' the secret court heard, as the unrepresented victim lay rotting in the cells below Cardiff Crown Court.

"Mr Kirk suffers from a condition called, 'paranoid delusional disorder' due to a fixated belief that he is being persecuted by the South wales Police.

Wales’ very own police run MAPPA (Multi Agency Public Protection Agency) on 8^th June 2009 had agreed to set me up to be shot, 10 09 27 Medical MAPPA 4p.pdf recorded in the minutes, with no agents present other than Caswell Clinic staff and senior police officers.

Public Protection Maintenance Unit (PPMU) of HM Probation Service visited me this week, in my much cluttered solitary cell Bristol Prison, solitary as the Remand Warrant issued whilst in Cardiff stated, ‘mental health issues’ and on the door it read, ‘High Risk’. [will they ever give up, I ask myself? Never while their pensions are assured]

A statutory requirement, he told me, was for Probation to inform the accused or convicted of the possible consequences for any act of ‘harassment or ‘breach of a restraining order’ under Section 4 of the much abused use of 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act.

No Cardiff Probation encounter has ever occured in Cardiff because the cabal knew the 1st Dec 09 case was flawed.

If I was not told of the existence of a restraining order it was obvious I would publish the latest farce experienced in Cardiff magistrates.

Cardiff prison had, in writing, repeatedly informed me of never having any knowledge of the 2009 MAPPA meetings carried out in Caswell Clinic or why, if true , on the 17th December 2009, I was mysteriously expunged from the MAPPA records! He promised to look into this and come back to me but I am not holding my breath.

My 21^st September no warning transfer from that Cardiff hell hole to an English prison was a dream come true and would, I knew, bust right open the Cardiff Cabal’s day to day conspiracies to lie, cheat and pervert the course of justice. I had to be transferred as the nefarious minded had feared their so far iron fist control over their local press was starting to slip due to their slow demise with the advent of cyberspace. The 'common assault' conviction had only been achieved by the conduct of a string of doctors implicating GPs, prison doctors and, of course numerous attached to Caswell Clinic an Professor Wood's Swansea University.

Six More Welsh Criminal allegations quashed in nearly Two Weeks 21st August Barry Arrest

This brings up my success rate back up again, since 1992 of almost daily police bullying, to 90% out of around some 160 trumped up charges and allegations.

One, I remember, being when they kept me locked up in Cardiff prison for days as ‘unidentified’! I had been arrested on the doorstep of my veterinary surgery, cheque book and bank and County Council letters in my pockets, surrounded by protesting clients and their pets.

Thirty four times The South Wales Police made me present my perfectly valid motor insurance documents, until they had me struck off in 2002. Not once have they seen my driving documents since once their agenda had been fulfilled it having been the police alone that had complained to the RCVS.

On the thirty fifth occasion in them asking, I remember, whilst I was on an urgent veterinary call, I told them to simply ‘go to hell’ or something more appropriate for the type of company I was forced to be in.

This was only to be successfully repeated before a Cardiff court, a few weeks later, when one of the most able of the Clerk’s of the court, a Mr Dobson, I had the good fortune to have intervene when he stopped the Magistrates convicting me by quoting out of section 10 or 11, I had used before, of the much then studied Magistrates Act, as amended, between either calving a cow or perhaps, attempting to put together the pieces of some unfortunate squashed cat or dog scraped off some road at three in the morning!

The remaining convictions, many motoring, were used to have me struck off as a veterinary surgeon for life. Those 90% eventually withdrawn or beaten down in open court, at huge personal loss to me and family always carried their Welsh vindictive trait, a refusal to award any compensation.

I am really too tired now to fight on much more and to tangle with a sub species, almost daily, with this South Wales’ HM backed conspiracy of countless malicious prosecutions and extreme acts of bullying, whilst guarenteed their pensions. Where went that Englishman simply wishing to quietly practice his dedicated art of veterinary surgery?

‘Common Assault’ Conviction on HM Cardiff Crown Court Clerk Dropped

Firstly, recent events whilst I was in prison, is their embarrassment of my 2^nd Nov 2010 ‘common assault’ conviction, my absence from the hearing due to illness, needs careful analysis.

I was refused the right to cross examine, dependant on their twisted interpretation of some section from The Youth and Justice Criminal Evidence Act and the opinion of that rogue police psychiatrist, again.

Their thirteen month delay to ‘sentence’ me on it, on 1^stDecember 2011, was watched by many and tape recorded by some, including teams of both police and NHS private lawyers, all defending their respective one million pound damages claims I have recently lodged since the 2010 ‘machine gun conspiracy’ when the police got caught having painted the WW1 Lewis gun a different colour in a futile attempt to fool the jury.......note black paint under South Wales Police silver.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Judge-Paul-Thomas-QC_2E00_.aspx

12 10 14 blog mg.docx

So why wasn't that trial stopped, as well?

But I digress,

Back to this month's 'common assault' Bristol Crown Court acquittal.....deliberately delayed for two years just to successfully oppose my bail and release from prison to prepare for the January 2013 three month trial of over police and HM Cardiff officials.........

The magistrate's court 1st Dec 11 court tape recording records:

”This incident was a relatively minor incident” therefore “no further penalty”, the tape records District Judge John Charles saying. What was the penalty?

In fact an ex South Wales Police officer, Derrick Hassan, had already falsified my forensic history for the rogue doctor’s 7^th August 2009 psychiatric report to have me sectioned to Caswell when no clinical examination by him had even taken place! He was the one who had pushed me down a flight of stairs in July 2010 following The Recorder of Cardiff, Nicholas Cooke QC, had refused to order the evidence as to why, after the collapsed machine gun trial, I was and still am treated as one of the top 5% most dangerous in the country (MAPPA 3/3) unbeknown to any other of their agencies other than Caswell Clinic and South Wales Police.

I had been on my crutches and daily morphine on that day in the Crown Court and the fall had broken my leg. District Judge John Charles was caught inadvertently explaining as to why the prosecution was fabricated, despite a Frank Werren having been tendered as an independent witness to the violent attack from the start.

Court proceedings were delayed purely to use the conviction to successfully oppose my bail applications during these past two years. Neither CPS nor the Cardiff courts will identify the original conviction caught on tape [LINK]

There remains the unquashed 28^th November 2011 convictions, used to oppose bail applications, other than 4^th May 2012 nine month conviction for beach of 1^st December 11 Restraining Order, the appeal now struck out by Mr Justice Mac duff in the Royal Courts of Justice and the £50 fine following the bizarre conviction when Cardiff Magistrate’s District Judge Bodfan Jenkins refused accepting my ‘not guilty ‘plea!

This London conviction, in Haringey’s magistrates, had been over the Musa’s bent lawyers in Kilburn refusing to hand over their and my paid for legal papers to be used to retrieve their then six children snatched for adoption.

Hello...Christopher Booker writes in todays "Sunday Telegraph" {below} of some disturbing cases in the "child protection system" of the UK - a system that has gone beserk...for some updates on the Musa case mentioned below in the article pls see: http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,68.msg125.html#msg125 - both Gloria and Chiwar Musa are having a very rough time in their respective prisons because the prison staff are giving them endless grief...and victimisation - as if imprisoning them after a trial that needs an official enquiry and removing all of their 7 children wasnt enough already.

We have not seen Chiwar for nearly a month now as all visits are being stopped by the prison {or government} authorities and we know Chiwar has made official prison visit applications for us as he's told various supporters often in phone calls when hes rung us from the prison. The same with Gloria's visits - it has proved impossible to see her even when weve gone on official visits {Sunday Aug. 12 for example at Holloway prison}. Mail to both Musas doesnt reach them either - nor emails via the emailaprisoner online service and you can see my official complaints to the prison governors + others here: http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,68.msg125.html#msg125 but of course both the governors of Holloway and Pentonville prisons refuse to reply about the irregularities happening to these unjustly imprisoned parents - the IMB reply, as does the Prisons Minister but one only gets the standard nonhelpful reply. The adoption processes are presumably ongoing re: the Musas 5 children whilst the Musas are in prison - apart from the youngest 2 babies who have already been passed for adoption even though the Musas did not have any say in it as it was all done behind their backs with the Musas having no legal representation also as they couldnt get any at the time! Other deportation plans are afoot which are equally as worrying. I would ask you please to view the attatchment to this email entitled "MUSA WALL 14 10 11" - Glorias affadavit to see the sorry state of affairs surrounding the Musa case - the authorities have been made very well aware of everything Gloria's affadavit mentions time after time yet have refused point blank to do anything ever - in fact this case never gets better - only progessively worse.

"The worst scandal I have seen in my 50-year career - Christopher Booker, "Sunday Telegraph" 14 Oct 12

Our 'child protection' system is severely dysfunctional, but it has not come to the centre of national attention because it hides its workings behind a veil of secrecy

One mother had her child taken away after falling out of a by Savings Sidekick" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9606161/The-worst-scandal-I-have-seen-in-my-50-year-career.html#" target="_blank">window and becoming temporarily paralysed. Social workers portrayed it as a suicide bid, and her as an alcoholic and a drug addict by Savings Sidekick" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9606161/The-worst-scandal-I-have-seen-in-my-50-year-career.html#" target="_blank">Photo: ALAMY

By Christopher Booker

7:00PM BST 13 Oct 2012

Scarcely a week goes by without more evidence emerging to indicate that our “child protection” system is so dysfunctional that it should be looked on as a major national scandal. On one hand, we see the number of by Savings Sidekick" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9606161/The-worst-scandal-I-have-seen-in-my-50-year-career.html#" target="_blank">applications by social workers to take children into care soaring to nearly 1,000 a month, having more than doubled in the four years since the tragedy of Baby P. On the other, we hear of horrific episodes, like those recently reported from Rochdale and Rotherham, where social workers and police turned a blind eye to the systematic mass-rape of underage girls, many themselves in state care.

For three years I have been investigating scores of cases of children seized from their parents for what appear to be quite absurd reasons. This outrage has not yet come to the centre of national attention only because our child protection system hides its workings behind a veil of secrecy. I have been amazed to discover how our family courts routinely turn all the cherished principles of British justice upside down. The most bizarre allegations, based on hearsay, can be levelled against parents who are then denied the right to challenge them.

Although I have reported on several such cases more than once, they drag on through the courts so long that I haven’t been able to explain how they ended. I summarise three of them here to indicate why this is the most disturbing story I have covered in all my years as a journalist.

The fateful fall

The Musa/ South Wales Police and my mutiple arrests in and around London and South Wales, in pretty quick succession, all related to the original pre 2009 'machine gun' case, my 1983 Mental Health Act 35 sectioning and my equally unlawful registration, as a MAPPA level 3 victim, to have me set up to be shot.

Multiple Arrests

1. Harringey Council's hoard of lawyers first had me arrested in the London family Court while I was assisting, as a Mackenzie Friend, the Musa couple left high and dry by the the deceitful Spencer Powell, solictors, of Kilburn, London. I was tape recording, this Ms Houghton told the police as handcuffs went on. Anything to stop the parents even seeing their own children.

2. Cardiff's Cabal had, on 28th November 2011, refused my attendance from Cardiff prison to cross examine the Musa's solictors, Spencer Powell, in Highbury Corner Magistrates, as the whole story would come out as to how these Kilburn lawyers had lied to the police, my having been arrested in their offices and had refused to release both my legal papers and those of the the Musas.....to keep drawing the already frauduantly obtained Legal Aid from the tax payer's completely out of controlled gravy train.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Musa-Files-Confiscated-Unlawfully.aspx

All my paid for legal papers were denied me, when I had inadvertently empolyed these lawyers whilst sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, in theTottenham police station, under South Wales Police instructions.

3. I was charged with criminal damage following my unlawful kidnap and my attempts to break out.

4. I was also accused of attempting to fly the children back to Nigeria in my two seat WW2 D-Day cub.

The Harringey magistrates have refused to re open, on my release, then denying my receiving my appeal papers and explaining why my around sixtieth Judicial Review Application, since I have languished in South Wales nearly always based on Article 6, was blocked by Cardiff’s Administrative Court.

Official court documents, of course, record as usual, as for most of Cardiff ‘talking shops’, an entirely different story.

Meanwhile the Cardiff HM concocted 2010 'common assault' malicious prosecution finally ran its predictable course, following the CPS moving it out of Wales to avoid potential media coverage following the Lynette White murder South Wales Police/Welsh Judiciary cover up.

Bristol’s HM Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) gave the Welsh papers one look and saw immediately it was a ‘can of worms’ and repeated, in Crown Court, the extra complication, as it was to be heard in an English court of law and that the ‘complainant’, a Mr Derrick Hassan, referred to earlier and other HM Crown Court staff witnesses, were now ‘reluctant to give evidence’ .

Unlike in a Welsh court these prosecution witnesses, all HM employed Cardiff Crown Court officals, knew their immunity to prosecution was gone as both Judges, now involved, Their Honours, Lambert and Ticehurst, would allow me to ‘cross examine’ their 'evidence in chief'.

5. Oxford Magistrates 'Threat to Kill' Christopher Paul Ebbs (Alexander) Allegation Dropped

Secondly, Oxford CPS and Thames Valley Police dropped, on 26^thSeptember, their ‘threat to kill’ allegations against me, over Mr Christopher Paul ALEXANDER, alias EBBS, a purported licenced aircraft engineer and much falsification of evidence induced by Cardiff’s Cabal before Judge Ticehurst nearly 15 years ago.

Whilst I was standing outside Oxford Crown Court , waiting on behalf of a number of other interested GA pilots for the trial to start, South Wales Police were contacted who clearly instigated my arrest and charges.

As with Bristol, once Oxford police had found time to make better enquiries they realised my arrest had been further fabricated over the South Wales Police’s success in having me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, again, using the same false psychiatric Caswell evidence of three years earlier.

The Musa Nigerian family's snatched children, by Haringey Council, culminated in a less fortunate situation with a vindictive seven year prison sentence for both parents.

Today it is revealed that Mr Ebbs’ earlier evidence, before the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons’ 2002 Disciplinary Committee, to have been so ‘coloured’, as to my being 'struck off', he explains, was induced by a South Wales Police, CAA and CPS ‘visitation’, from across the Severn Bridge and London just to put pressure on him to change his original eye witness account aleady recorded.

Whereas Thames Valley police dropped this August's case, like the proverbial hot potato, HM Cardiff prison refused me even a video link to apply for costs.

6. 2^nd ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ allegation Dropped

12 10 11 2nd alleged Breach of Resrstaining Order Appl to Restore.pdf

The 'offending' article

Caswell Clinic actively invite me to contact their doctors following its 7th Aug 2009 psychiatric report of 'paranoid delusional disorder'

12 10 04 Caswell Clinic.pdf

Thirdly, my deliberate delay, maybe, in ordering the 2^nd May transcript T20120090 - kirk - evid of williams evid - 02 05 12.pdf

of the Cardiff Crown Court fiasco, portrayed in the Clerk of theCourt, Mr Michael Williams’ evidence, related incidentally also, it is rumoured, to the notorious doctor safely employed by NHS (Wales). Mr Williams had to convince the jury, which he did, that at lunch time, I had served on me an authentic but final version of the ‘Restraining Order’ seen by him whilst he was hiding in one of the court cells.

At no other time were any other papers shown to me by anyone from court, the jury heard.

I had been denied all cctv footage from inside my ‘special’ cell, above the toilet corridor or at custody suite exit.

Similarly, I was denied all court or custody record of any evidence of any court visitors to the custody suite, service or otherwise of any documents or names of the five other guards, vital witnesses, who saw it all and know, today, the truth as to who when and where came to and from and what occurred , who destroyed the GEOamy records once the CPS and magistrate put their heads together etc

SO WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED in the 1st December11 Magistrates Cells and during 2nd May 12 Cardiff Jury Trial?

Did the jury really not expect neither GEOamy Custody Services nor the Cardiff Court to have had written record of an official 'service' a Court Order, of their own making and under such a wierd joint responsibility? Of course they did'nt, circumstanses did not allow it.

The jury were prevented from seeing :

1. the two contradictory MG11 prosecution witness statements, I specifically asked Judge Curran to give them, to compare with their cross examination

2. the GEOamey and clerk of the court logs

3. a scale plan of the incident area with measurements marking cameras and numerous other staff positions

4. the time log relating to each prisoner movement....if and when fed/lavatory?

5. property log ....the receipt of court papers into property sealed bag

6. a 'Vue de Justice', so essential

7. 3 x CCTV footage of cell, corridor and exit area

8. Numerous witnesses to the several visits from the court relating to the too ing and fro ing of draft restraining orders

9. any evidence to support the statutory defence from section 1 (3) (a) &(b) of 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act, 'to detect or prevent crime'

etc

10. 11 11 14HHJ Llewellyn Jones QC Orders request.pdf

11. 12 07 26 Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal Court of Appeal ref.pdf

12. 12 07 26 Crown Prosecution Service BLOG Criminal Court of Appeal ref.docx

TO BE CONTIUED

+ WHAT WAS THE SMUGGLED IN PER RECTUM IN JAN 2010 ‘MACHINE GUN' HHJ PAUl THOMAS TRIAL and 2^nd MAY 2012 HHJ CURRAN JURY TRIAl?

It is highly likely the Restraining Order service was attempted in the fight with the five officers when I was jettisoned from the building, after 5pm, with force leading to my need for a wheel chair only to be hand cuffed, in the Magistrates building, by gate arrest police, for failing to attend the Musa related Haringey Council hearing , two days earlier, as the prison refused my attendance by HM Partnership hell bent to continue protecting the Haringey council lawyers treachery driven by avarice

All hushed just like the next assault by GEOamy, on 4th April 2012, when I was mysteriously taken to magistrates cells from the prison and refused reason as to why? Never saw any court room , no paper work, as usual, attacked again whilst demanding an explanation, demanded immediately, in writing, the cctv, this time and have heard nothing since. Tackled the prison systems, governor, IMB etc .....all a big joke.

The custody officers were only too well aware my last claim against being beaten up in the magistrate cells won me £10,000 which is why all CCTV was quicklky destroyed by both court staff and GEOamey.

I offer £2000

to anyone to come forward and identify them and secure copies of custody and court logs for 1st December 11 & 4th April 12, for the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) and Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).

My refusal to leave the cell that day, to my freedom, for four hours, until after 5pm, when five burly guards finally physically threw me out, throwing my crutches on my head as I lay on the ground, outside the custody unit, was because I was demanding,and being denied a written explanation as to why I was being released?

My almost last cross examination question to the Clerk of the court was crucial. I was on my crutches, while hobbling from the toilet area when ‘effective service’ took place? “Yes”,he said but crutches are never allowed in the custody suite for obvious reasons and anyway, the MG6 police witness statements of his and of the equally lying Barker, the GEOamey custody manager, stated I had the ‘service’inside my cell, with Barker and another first having to unlock it!

What Barker had attempted to show me, only once and at lunch time, before returning it to the court clerk and CPS barrister, David Gareth Evans, as I sat on the cell bench furthest from the door, was what appeared, at the time, to be a part hand written draft ‘restraining order’ prepared before commencement of this 10^th November 11 trial.

On that fateful 1^st December 2011 hearing many of my friends, including Mr B from the public gallery, watched the CPS and clerk hand to the district judge, in my absence, one of several restraining order drafts floating about and watched the judge reject it, out of hand, until he wrote on it with his fountain pen, quite draconian demands to justify The Recorder of Cardiff’s already drafted 14^th November Court Orders, marked on court file, ‘only to be opened’ ‘when Mr Kirk is sentenced!

Yes, this is an early version of restraining order typed by CPS, retreeived during 2nd May 12 jury trial from Merthyr Tydfil CPS office, discussed in open court and handed to Mr Bowen and myself in the dock. A later version was the one seen in 1st Dec11 magistrates court being written over by the district judge, later broughty to my cell for approval.

Yes , you guessed it, now CPS and Cardiff Magistrates, in writing, deny any knowledge or existence of there having ever been any ‘draft restraining orders’

http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2012/10/07/i-m-out-of-gaol-and-no-welsh-rigged-jury-to-face.aspx

while in secret, no doubt, blaming each other for so stupidly disclosing to me what limited public court records that prove the HM conspiracy.

Is that what really goes on in our other UK Courts and why ‘Litigants in Person’ (LiPs) are so vilified? Remember, a defendant emplying a lawyer is always at serious risk of his defence information being no longer confidential and so fatally compromised.

My Mackenzie Friend that day was alongside me in the court dock. This Mr B, upon hearing this startling evidence on oath, had been so minded, as my back was turned, as to quietly ask the barrister for the drafts. My usual meticulous ‘pre flight planning’ had not catered for this as it would be arising much later. As it turned out, being refused any defence witnesses, as in the original magistrates' summary hearing, Meirion’s intervention proved opportune and exposed, once again, the day to day deceit practiced in Cardiff courts due to, yet again, the outdated but abused‘Royal prerogative’ guaranteeing them HM immunity to either civil or criminal prosecution.

Her Majesty’s representative, Mr Evans, then admitted he may have to withdraw to be my defence witness but Judge Curran was having none of it.

Neither Evans was to tender a plea of ‘offering no evidence’ nor was this Cardiff judge going to stop yet another trial, like what had to be done in the equally scandalous‘dangerous driving' jury trial when the jury had to finally pass a note to the judge to stop it. They asked that the senior police officer, in the well of the court, to stop signalling his mates, while under my cross examination.

Similarly nine members of the 2009 'machine gun' jury trial told me in a local resturant, after the acquittal, their minds were made up after the first day of evidence that it was a police conspiracy.

Where in the world, other than in a Cardiff court, could you get away with obtaining a conviction, before an independant jury of twelve, when the police used the museum owner who first sold me the aircraft with the gun attached and then the museum owner who bought it from me, both to be prosecution witnesses, rather than sharing a space in the dock?

But Mr Evans, in this Restraining Order jibberish had just handed us both, in the dock, one of his drafts! a purported copy of a draft restraining order for a rogue doctor . Cardiff Magistrates and CPS lyingly, as is their habit, denied there ever existed a 'draft restraining order' or record of it......? an example to the uninitiated of what I, for 20 years, have been up againsthere in South Wales.

BUT the jury was not allowed to see the draft just produced in court or the CPS's various other draft restraining orders, some hand written over nor even its final version! The one they saw was date stamped, '9th Dec'.

My jury was not even allowed to see the purported 'offending' 4th December kirkflyingvet.com blog, even if it may have been created in a foreign jurisdiction

So why didn't the case get stopped?

Consider the back-lash on NHS (Wales) officials, for starters and Welsh Cabal.

Has the reader wondered why a 2nd allegation, six weeks after another, 13th August 2012 'breach of a restraining order ', was also dreamed up if only to have me locked up for nearly two months, to hamper my preparation?

It followed my frustrated near 40 visits and same number of phone calls to the three Cardiff law courts, police stations and CPS offices, slowly piecing together, for Criminal Court of Appeal in London , as to just what happened, this time, in one of their latest conspiracies?

As far back as 2009 they had been alerted by me and others, from my horrific conditions from within a Caswell cell, of the doctor's syphoning off patients from the NHS system to his private clinics he ran in conjunction with his invaluable business partner in the higher archy of the Port Talbot NHS (Wales) HQ.

The predicted ‘nuclear fall-out’ over the Chief Constable’s privately running of clandestine South Wales Police MAPPA meetings, using Dolmans to obtain classified Public Interest Immunity sensitive material, only to have me on 24/7 surveillance to use both tactics to identify my prosecution material, in my private prosecutions against Dolmans' Adrian Oliver, the Chief Constable and rogue doctor, is about to happen.

The blocking of these particularly politically sensitive 90s police incidents, by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, from his 2013 trial, just to protect the RCVS and other departments under HM immunity to prosecution, does not detract from the fact that I will never stop until my name is put back on the veterinary register and I have seen serious reform or preferably, a complete annihilation of the Welsh judiciary while it deems to be British.

Further evidence has now arisen, other than unauthorised MAPPA ‘agents’ present, except for the rogue doctor or his wife, possibly, have been convened in NHS Caswell Clinic, since 17th December 2009, to having me finally eliminated.

No other level 12 forensic psychiatrist was prepared to sign the second signature, along side the Caswell clinic doctor, required and asked for by His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, on 2^nd December 2009, for the 1983 Mental Health Act sectioning for my life imprisonment without trial was to be achieved.

Remember, readers and members of the next jury on this very same matter, Evans et al had the full backing of Dolmans, solicitors, Cardiff, in the conduct of this latest case, who not just acted since 1993 for the then Chief Constable and then Barbara Wilding, during the 2009 machine gun conspiracy but had also falsified evidence over her equally signed and falsely sworn February 2009 affidavit ordered originally by his Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, now retired, unfortunately. That conspiracy led to Dolmans having me arrested on 22nd June 2009 to have me arrested on 22^nd June 2009.

Dolmans had not just caused my arrest but had also advised both MAPPA and their client to launch the police helicopter, that sunny Sunday morning and armed police unit with the hope of another chance to kill me. It was not until a second raid, the next day, of similar expense and stupidy, was I finally arrested.

The idiots in charge of the SWAT team had missed their moment, just four days earlier, when I was found on secure premises, surrounded by riot police brandishing machine guns in tin hats and stun grenades dangling from their belts, as I quietly stood patiently outside the chief Constable’s office in Bridgend police HQ, to simply exchange witness summonses for the, once again, adjourned three month trial originally set for hearing back in the 90s!

The currently unregulated but lucrative legal trade, due to the Memorandum of Understanding between police and The Law Society, causes victims to know, only too well, that the need to protract even the most simple of legal proceedings, like most divorce cases or this one, must be strung out for years, if possible, as in Jarndyce and Jarndyce, in Charles Dickens’ Bleak House, if the lawyers on both sides are, again, to make a ‘killing’.

My January 2013 civil damages claim hearing has caused the Cardiff Cabal to block any other progress in the manyfollow up claims against the police and doctor. Now you must realise why?

Well over one hundred South Wales police officers and HM Cardiff court staff, in January, are to face my cross examination which appears to be something I may be looking forward to.

E-mails start flooding in from around the world

T’s ‘first thoughts’ after reading the 3^rd September12 HHJ Williams (another relation?) Cardiff Crown Court refusal for my bail and 2^nd May 12 HHJ Curran’s refusals, contrary to Article 6 etc, caused him to e-mail me this short missive:

“It is clear to me from reading this transcript that the main reason why they have dropped the case is that you have again raised the issue of disclosure of the Gareth Evans Restraining Order and the CPS are anxious to cover this up so that you cannot use the disclosure to assist in the Curran Criminal Appeal.

I note that the judge didn't respond to your various questions and issues and was anxious to get you out of the court asp.

They were also ordered to serve the prosecution papers on you and prepare an indictment, so it appears that they never did this and didn't want a plea and directions hearing to take place.

It is all so obvious that a child can see what is going on here”.

Maurice’s reply:

“Are you suggesting, T, a nobbled jury, surely not, perish the thought

PS

I have just retrieved my snail mail post from Barry and find that District Judge Bodfan Jenkins, no less, has awarded South Wales Police £4000 costs in my private civil or criminal claim, under the 1897 Police Act, in my three years of attempts trying to retrieve my antique shot guns, licenced guns, machine gun ammunition, legal papers from the 22nd June 2009 Trojan/SWAT raid and now, if rumour has it, a walking stick 'shot gun' they have now admitted was recovered from my home during their concocted January 2010 'machine gun' trial! NOW with the beleaguered IPCC

12 07 11 IPCC Application 2012 001471.pdf 12 06 01 SWP MG IPCC Conclusion.pdf

The latter, but nothing else, appears to be contrary to section 5 of the 1968, as amended, Fire Arms Act but please keep it to your selves.

Is this a job for the new Justice Minister or modern day Enid Blyton to series aTV soap, rivalling East Enders, before Wales gets its long awaited independence, shortly, from Whitehall for of its current evil justice system, with no Whitehall restraint what so ever, to really go crazy?

And for the main meal,

A sample of my 20 years before Cardiff judges

Cardiff Judge Williams Blocks my Bail Application so immediately I apply to Bristol Crown Court and get Released

12 09 03 T20127589 Bail Appl HHJ Williams.pdf

Alun Cairns MP recieves update on the state of Cardiff's Law Courts

PPS

When I go to prison, again, possibly, quite shortly, possibly, my defence will be exactly the same at Cardiff's hearings, as on 1st December 2011, 1st March 2012, 2nd May 2012 and 21st August 2012.......sub section 1(3) (a) and (c) of that traitor Blair's 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act hurried legislature, to feed the 'gravy train' for his buddies', before he was lynched or worse.

12 07 14 Cardiff Cabal Caught Out Conspiring Again.pdf

Dolmans, it now turns out, schemed this Summer to have me arrested yet again!

They informed the CPS of the proceedings in the civil damages claim, in August, relating to the Cardiff courts not allowing my entry to the respective public counters, to process my civil and criminal cases, ever since they lost5 the 'Vexatious Litigant application to the High Court, four years ago!

Their junior barrister even supplied her notes to the prosecution prior to the decision to my 21st September arrest.

I was charged in the police cells for failing to pay the £50 witness summons fee prior sending to the Clinical Director of Caswell Clinic a witness summons un sealed form to hand over the evidence, to the court, I have a possible brain tumour but I have 'significant brain damage' sufficient to be MAPPA level 3 registered and not fit to conduct any civil court proceedings against the South Wales Police or defend myself without a court appointed lawyer.

Crown Court, CPS and Dolmans, following yet another collapsed prosecution now refuse to disclose that evidence or this 4th December 2011 web site blog used in the 2nd May jury trial, having closed it down as in the past when I appear to be getting to close to the truth.

I remain with without a huge list of court /CPS and police documents previously used to maliciously prosecute.

My lonely position is not just against a vindictive and inherently deceitful police force, in South Wales it also includes many but not all, in the HM Cardiff courts

STOP PRESS
Just received a somewhat comical Judge Bodfan Jenkins Court Order to pay £4000 costs and dismissing my attemptes to retreive about £10,000 worth of private property confiscated, in June 2009, by the South Wales Police they being particularly narked because of my 'sting'.
I had seen the police helicopter hovering over head, the day before and huge SWAT team skulking in their cars and the woods around, only to suddenly abort my arrest or illlimination.
When the police tried again , the next day, advised by Dolmans, solicitors, who had instigated my arrest, in the first place, by making the complaint for their client, The Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, I left dummy machine gun ammunition on my desk with the Court of Appeal file, both now missing, re 15th June 2009 (see above) JR Royal Courts of Justice refusal re RCVS, Attorney General and South Wales Poilice as defendants.
The police refused to produce their video footage of the search of the house, obviously, at the 'machine gun ' trial nor the one immediately afterwards , when I made a detailed rwritten complaint of the forensic psychiatrist/police conspiracy.
Dismissed in my absence, my being locked away, unaware, to avoid their still further embarassment of a shooting stick shot gun found in our home. apparently, with  the police , under my disclosure application being forced to tell me about it three years later!!!! As mentioned earlier the Welsh judiciary appear only interested in charging me £4000 for simply asking for my property back.
My Appeal to the High Court is sent:
12 10 10 Case Stated property.doc
But shouldn't this also go in the one million pound 'machine gun' malicious prosecution Claim or NHS (Wales) falsified psychiartic records one million pound Claim?
12 10 10 Case Stated property.doc

IPCC
Sale
Manchester
England
16th October 2012
re IPCC case numbers: 2009/016588 & 2012/001471
Dear Sir/Madam,
Further to my 11th July 2012 letter;
12 07 11 MJK reply IPCC re SWP 18th June South Wales Police Professional Standards.docx   in response to South Wales Police reply to 12 06 018 SWP MG IPCC Conclusion.pdf
I wish to draw your attention to a most recent statement by a Mr Christopher Paul Alexander, aircraft engineer and pilot, who has submitted evidence, of his own free will, that South Wales Police had travelled to England, at night and not in uniform, including a police officer, once named Sergeant Rice , CAA officer Mr Jim Mackenna, now retired  and CPS personel, including a Mr Evans some, if not all, to cause him to change his MG 11 police witness statements, on 'threats to kill'.
The meeting took place at Aust Services station requiring a number of vehicles and other south Wales police personel.
In the light of your past refusals in properly investigating my considerable list of proven complaints will you ignore this one and to whom do I complain if you do not?

G-KIRK cub at Taipei just before http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/around_the_world/Liberty-Girl-Engine-Failure.aspx

Now, despite twenty years of South Wales Police adversity, G-KURK D-Day Piper Cub is almost ready, in Hampshire, for my flight to South Africa and Everest or The Falklands via a little island, en route?
http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/around_the_world/Cub-nearly-ready-for-Cape-Town.aspx

Threat to Shoot Lord Mayor of Cardiff

Maurice — Thu, 31 May 2012 16:39:00 GMT

"IF THE STATE GET IT WRONG IT IS DANGEROUS TO BE RIGHT"

Voltaire

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Magna-Carta-Day.aspx

http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/news/Pages/pr_240512_corruptionreport.aspx

Received, at last, one more Judicial Review 'Refusal', 'on the papers', refused by last month's 'Breach of a Restraning Order' trial judge, His Honour Judge Curran, on some bl==dy nonsense over whether or not a 'Restraining Order' was ever served on me in the cells as if there was not ample contemporaneous records about!

Originating from, if true, this very 'Harassment' issue, £50 fine, 'shoot to kill' hearings and Section 39 abuse, under review in this very JR application! So who blocks the investigation the most senior Cardiff Crown court judge...anything to block exposure of the truth...corruption is just rife around here or is it me with some brain disorder?

While the prosecution barrister, David Garreth Evans apolgised to the jury, for not being available as my main defence witness, he still having an early version of this now, ubiquitous 'restraining order' in his pocket. The District Judge John Charles' Magistrates court's, custody and cell cctv records are, meantime, quickly being shredded, re written or burnt, in fear the law, that Litigants in Person are not, as of right, entitled to public court records, may get itself repealed in Westminster..

So, if the CPS has a copy in his pocket, partly hand written by John Charles, then what is prosecution exhibit 1, labelled '1st December11 Restraining Order', doing with the jury when it is date stamped 9th Dec ?

So another version, slipped under my police door on 23rd Dec 11, is the first one I see but different also from exhibit 1. Very strange.

Very strange, indeed, for the police did not e-mail me one, as promised, on the 19th Dec, over the phone from Llantwit police station.

Oh, very odd......but hang on a minute that must be the one they quickly printed up following my unexpected appeal to Crown Court, in England, on the 7th Dec, no?

But I went to the magistrates court and told they had no record at all of any restraining order.

But, of course, John Charles, had, in his fit of peak,scribbled out a section 4 'restraining order', contrary to the Section 2 Harassment Act , currently before the court, to obtain a maximum jail term, if broken.

Someone in HM Partnership, however, must have blocked it because the 8th Dec version, created on computor and 'certificate of conviction' has omitted the 'fear of violence' phrase on it. Stop worrying Maurice, Gareth ,you will remember, told the jury he was checking up with his local bar council that all is ok and that the apparant conspiracy, witnessed by his friends in the public gallery, of CPS and Charles hatching a diversion, was going rapidly pear shaped. Muttering over court exhibits, I remember and I never saw. I heard Gareth and judge mumble, 'switch them' and we will have him locked away.

Fortunately, all was tape recorded and smuggled out of court as a procautionary matter in case the cabal are setting me up, again, to be shot by South Wales Police marksmen. All this was discussed, in detail, during the IAP and MAPPA police HQ meetings in June 2009. Operation Orchid and Operation Chalice, re machine gun and snatching my younger daughter, were foiled but hey will get it right next time, I fear.

Remember, They control the Welsh IPCC, Welsh GMC, Welsh Bar Council and their Cardiff Bay 'talking shop', Wales' big mistake for its best future .....their key members are entrenched, all in the same lodge and ready to do more damage for the devil.

Any way, not to worry 'justice ' is in a safe pair of hands.....His Honour ordered Gareth to nip back up to his Crown Prosecution Service office, in Merthyr Tydfil and get the Restraining Order, serve it to me so we can all go home. But, over night, we all forget except for two on the jury. They are starting to work out the judge's cunning plan only to be thwarted, following their request for sight of the custody records that service ever took place in the cells below that chaotic December magistrates court hearing when I was refused the usual right to cross examine, call witnesses, finish my evidence, have any legal papers or even have pen and paper in my cell.

"Do not trouble your pretty heads", Judge Curran must have said, "the court record of there ever being printed a 'restraining order and served, all on that day, is irrelevant to Maurice's blatent guilt".

" and as for the two cameras, he referred to, one in his special padded isolation cell, with £5000 'see through' door, that filmed every move of this MAPPA level 3 victim, sadly,( pause while wiping his eyes), GEOamey Custody Services appear to have 'mislaid' all the footage."

"It is also quite irrelevant so, hurry up on your way, its late on a Friday afternoon and I am already late, a majority verdict will do and dont worry about Maurice calling for Gareth ,the doctor and another,,,,its all far too late"

Hang on a moment, didn't this same judge insist the main witness, the doctor, give evidence for me but only through a court lawyer? Yes, of course, his 22nd February 2012 Crown Court Order, part of my defence evidence stuffed up my rectum, in order to get it into court.

Now, as I remember it, this judge also appointed a special Cardiff Cabal lawyer, under rule 39 of the Youth and Justice Criminal Evidence Act 1999, anything to block any possiblility of evidence coming out and that I may not have 'significant brain damage' or 'possible brain tumour' after all.

But what is this, both doctor and appointed lawyer fail to attend court....."oh, what can be done?" "Oh, I am all undone, I am in fear and shaking in my shoes, of the meer rumour of this last act of treachery must cause, being mis understood by Jo Public as being an unfair trial.

Just what will it do to the name of Cardiff law courts.....oh, perish the thought

I wonder if Enyd Blyton could have made up this sort of stuff ? Must look into serialising these proceedings, some time, to rival some TV soap.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/general/images/original/Mother-Mollie-_2C00_-Snipe-and-Hector.aspx

His Honour Judge Curran has, understandably, rejected my 1^st Judicial Review Application, ‘on paper', on the premise that it is ‘not clear' as to my reasoning behind my grievance, in being convicted of so serious offence, during my absence. The police, once again, are reliant on false forensic evidence supplied by Derrick Hassan of the Cardiff Crown Court and a doctor to obtain yet another prolonged incarceration without a proper trial.

Court record will disclose that the District Judge, Bodfan Jenkins, presiding at last August Cardiff magistrates hearing, had not even been given my correspondence regarding my right, under statute law, to apply for a re opening of the case. He was also never made aware of the full circumstances on the bizarre incident, involving alleged prohibited weapons in my possession, including a ‘walking stick shot gun', being the real reason for the summary conviction and £50 fine.

[This startlingly acknowledgement by the police, of finding a real prohibited weapon, contrary to Section 5(1)(a) of the 1968 Fire Arms Act 1966, at my home, right in the middle of my January 2009 ‘WW1 Lewis machine gun' trial, was completely hushed up and only surfaced before the very same District Judge, Mr Bodfan Jenkins, this March, in one of my many private prosecutions, due to someone's stupidity letting it slip through their own safety net].

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Wanted-for-Attempted-Murder.aspx

This one caused the destruction of my family life, at 8am on 22nd June 2009, using twenty five coppers +, followed by my nearly eight months in jail as an innocent man, but who's counting?

This one, with a rogue doctor, both on the purse strings of lots of charity cash, in South Wales......but that is another story to those with the bottle

This one personally arranged to have me struck off as a veterinary surgeon, using countless spurious convictions from a thoroughly corrupt Cardiff judicial system...but this is only the tip of the iceberg

***, My friends know where you live

This same argument or the use of Section 36 YJCEA, anything to suppress the truth, is just what

District Judge Berg, on 2^nd November 10 common assault conviction, applied when expediting it in meer nana seconds during my forced absence, due to ill health due to unnecessary analgesic medication. This appeal is now in Bristol having been transferred from Wales due to its potentially embarrassing outcome.

If only a litigant in person in Cardiff could just have sight of public court records, when only reserved for the legal profession, we need not shout blackmail so often.

Exposure, of course, of what really is going on in our courts, if further public records were to be disclosed to the public, would, for example, be like what happened following the prison hospital emergency, needing seventeen prison officers to extricate me.

Out of the prison for a day, in cuffs, I get sight of what was written on court record, my ‘Remand Warrant' indicating clearly what lay behind the judiciary's next move.

Apart from quick sight of my custody record and remnants of my exalted status amongst the inmates of a category level C parochial prison, during my 2009 stay, as MAPPA level3, the words, ‘extremely dangerous' remained.

Both court and custody documents, seen by myself, during the material times of all these JRs, currently before His Honour Judge Curran, Mr Justice Singh, record I have ‘mental health issues' clearly written with ‘significant brain damage' written.

This immediately brings into doubt my level of capacity in the past three years court appearances, exceeding well over one hundred, known by the prosecution throughout.

This hand written note, on the Remand Warrant, no doubt, was by the clerk of the court and/or signed by the very District Judge first implementing a Section 36, without giving reason and then sitting in judgment.

As for the so called ‘served' Restraining Order neither the original nor certified true copy we will ever see because it now helps identify the author of it and true recipient for my term of imprisonment.

This 2010 ‘common assault' conviction, on appeal in Bristol, will prove even more interesting, following my most recent attempts at the steps of Cardiff Crown Court to lodge my paper, as it is so devoid of ‘magistrates record', the recent letters from the court clerk effectively stating, ‘in your dreams, Maurice', no records for you.

So why does this latest JR refusal, ‘on paper', accompany a copy of the Cardiff Crown court log of my 1^st/2^nd March 2012 Harassment Appeal, when for years now I have always been refused of such public record?

If you are eligible for legal aid then, of course, your designated lawyer can see them, at tax payer's expence, for as long as he likes and even give them to you, if he so pleases. The reality of this is, of course, is quite unrealistic, if nefarious schemes are afoot as he or she is an ‘officer of the court' and therefore making it impossible to remain impartial.

It stinks, doesn't it?

Statute law dictates that a ‘litigant in person'(LiP) may, if he is so lucky, obtain disclosure of a clerk of the court's notes, both contemporaneous and later records, such as, in this case, written record of the allegation(s) facing the accused. The court is only obliged to release a certificate of conviction.

These next two ladies outside the RCJ have spent much of their lives, fighting for justice, mutilated by this gross injustice of failed disclosure of court documents

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Diana-_2600_-Sheida-RCJ.aspx

I have received no copy of whatever was first before the August Magistrate, what was charge was changed, in my absence or copy of the CPS legal argument that went on with the court without me. This had followed the duty solicitor's hurried visit to my cell, that summer's day, advising me to plead ‘not guilty' as it had been arranged for the case to be dropped if I did.

Why was so serious a charge dropped?

Because I had just served new statements, from a Lincolnshire airfield, of eye witnesses over the police re painted ‘machine gun', spent still more hours before with the station's inspector while copious complaint was again being taken down, re the Cardiff IPPC office refusing, since 2009, to properly investigate:

1. the Polices policy to having me shot

2. falsifying critical evidence in their disastrous ‘machine gun' case, painting of the ‘gun' twice, making it serviceable, all to fool a jury

3. changing the sex of ‘Foxy', their undercover agent, that had to give evidence

4. their continuing harassment of me, around the UK, by the use of falsified two year old psychiatric evidence

Today, as in the recent ‘Restraining Order' jury trial and their written notes to the judge, I am still without the public record of either of these cases!

Court record, regarding the Lord Mayor Cardiff to be shot, are being withheld for the purpose of my being sectioned, again, under the 1983 Mental Health Act, but this time for life.

South Wales Police almost achieved it in 2009 and with co-operation from the Tottenham police, during the ‘Nigerian Musa seven snatched children affair', in court NOW at Wood Green Crown Court, London. This time the same MAPPA police intend finding the ‘elusive second doctor', needed by statute, to sign me away, IPP, to Broadmoor.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Musas--Jailed-Children-Snatched-.aspx

The purpose of my JR Application is clearly in the interest of the general public, not just for my liberty, safety and family concerns.

The next presiding judge, I humbly submit, is required to consider the consequences should this need to go to the Court of Appeal happen and where Article 6 and its supposed safeguards will again be challenged as being needed even more in our current political climate.

My recent interviews, with my ‘straw poll' sample taken from within the walls of Cardiff Prison, proved disturbing to say the least. Invariably, both remand and convicted prisoners do not even see the paper work identifying as why they are in prison! Yes, many neither care nor enquire; the place is a ‘holiday camp' with no real purpose, so why rock the boat?

If I could have found another LiP, out of the hundred or so prisoners on my wing, I may have established if I was the only one, in the prison, with that special piece of paper, a ‘Remand Warrant'. It was signed by the court giving authority to allow the HM Governor to lock me up.

Where His Honour and or the next judge will be concerned will rest on the veracity of those in ultimate control, the guards who guard the guardians, for without proper disclosure there will be yet another fine example of a travesty of justice in a Cardiff court room.

Copy to HM Treasury solicitor, on behalf of the Respondents.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Private-Prosecutions.aspx

Maurice 'Burnt Out' and Needs Your Help!

Maurice — Tue, 29 May 2012 14:34:00 GMT

Please, anyone, have a quick look at the enclosed draft appeal to the Criminal Court of Appeal, London and suggest improvements as it has to be deposited there by this Friday's dead line.

It is far too dangerous to enter Wales and deposit it at Cardiff Crown Court , as procedure dictates, because I run the risk of yet another jail term. Last time I did a Derrick Hassan who supplied falsified forensic police evidence to have me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act , for Broadmoor, puched me down the court steps and broke my leg.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/files/folders/south_wales_police/entry1467.aspx

Keith Vaz MP takes up interest in South Wales' IPCC conduct over falsification of forensic evidence in Cardiff Crown Courts

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Machine-Gun.aspx

Photo of my leaving Cardiff Magistrates, in hand cuffs, by narked South Wales Police, on 1st December 2011, with no knowledge of any existance of a 'restraining order but beaten up by GEOamey Custodial Services just minutes before. all caught on video the judge, Mr Curran, refused to be made shown to the 4th May12 jury in Cardiff Crown Court.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Evil-Cardiff-Magistrates.aspx

Cardiff Cabal are so embarassed this incident, leading to my arrest, has been tranferred to Bristol Crown Court for trial, for fear of the publicity

Can anyone, please, cross the bridge to Cardiff and deliver it, with the court forms, on my behalf, before 4pm Friday, 1st June2012?

I am currently in Bristol and can deliver docs to anyone who can help.....thankyou

But I need help to improve the document as I cannot remember much of what was said during the numerous trials that have kept me locked up since most of the last eight months

tel 07907937953 maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

http://www.channel4.com/news/police-corruption-trial-collapses

His Honour Judge Patrick's Section 39 Order Restricts the publication of more details ...Re Musa trial

so be there!

I hope to be in London, until Friday, while I attend:

the Nigerian seven snatched children, by Haringey Council, a scandalous affair, at Wood Green Crown Court, while their parents remain in prison facing deportation..

http://kirkflyingvet.com/files/folders/south_wales_police/entry1450.aspx

DRAFT GROUNDS

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

(CRIMINAL DIVISION)

THE QUEEN

- v -

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

____________________________

GROUNDS OF APPEAL

______________________________

AGAINST CONVICTION

"REAL POSSIBILITY" OF ACTUAL AND/OR PERCEIVED PREJUDICE AND/OR BIAS OF HIS HONOUR JUDGE CURRAN

1. His Honour Judge Curran ought to have recused himself from presiding over the trial of the Appellant as he had previously stayed the Appellant's application to the Cardiff Administrative Court for Judicial Review of the Appellant's appeal at Cardiff Crown Court, Case A20110290, on 1^st March 2012 and his conviction and sentance of harassment, contrary to the Section 2 of Protection from Harassment Act 1997, at Cardiff Magistrates Court, on 1st December 2011, the subject of the Restraining Order allegedly breached in this present case.

2. Whilst accepting that the issues of fact in the trial were for the jury, His Honour Judge Curran made a number of rulings that erred in law similar if not identical to those by both District Judge John Charles, at Cardiff Magistrates and his Honour Judge PD Hughes QC, in its appeal, at Cardiff Crown Court.

3. Subsequently, failed disclosure of evidence, by way of court and custody documents and cctv footage, all under the control of the South Wales Police, caused the Appellant, in each of these court cases, compounded the reasons for refusal of access to his own legal papers in both court and prison and be given any facilities, at all, to either interview or call his own witnesses.

4. All prosecution witnesses, in the two previous above mentioned trials, were prevented from being cross examined by the Claimant while the main witness, a doctor, in the jury trial, subject to this appeal, was denied the Claimant's required examination or cross examination, contrary to His Honour Judge Curran QC's 22^nd February 2012 Court Order.

5. This was further compounded following, first by the failure to attend of the court instructed barrister, to cross examine the witness(es) ‘on the Appellant's behalf ', under Section 36 of Youth and Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 and following His Honour Judge Hugh Davies QC's April 2012 Court Order that caused this main prosecution witness to be removed from the witness list, as irrelevant and so facilitate the Appellant's immediate release from prison.

6. For the prosecution barrister, on 2^nd May 2012, to then open the prosecution's case by stating, before the jury and the trial judge, that the South Wales Police had ‘just decided' not to now call the doctor to give evidence, was nothing short of a criminal offence.

7. For the Appellant then not to be allowed to call this already empanelled prosecution witness, being ‘anybody's property', as his psychiatrist, expert witness and/or witness of fact and/or as his character witness, was a further abuse.

8. Before His Honour Judge Hugh Davies QC the prosecution had admitted it was only by the citing of this same witness, in all these three hearings, 2009 WW1Machine Gun trial and numerously related other summary hearings, by the South Wales Police, that the Crown Prosecution Service had been able to be successful, for the South Wales Police, to oppose the Appellant's preparation of both his civil and criminal cases, against the Chief Constable, out of custody, since 8am 22^nd June 2009.

9. By April 2012 the Appellant had almost served the pre arranged prison sentence of nine months, in any event, when bail would have been granted, by His Honour Judge Hugh Davies QC, had the Appellant been so stupidly minded as to apply.

10. There was a "real possibility" of actual and/or perceived bias, as a result of His Honour Judge Curran presiding over the Appellant's trial, when the learned Judge had already stayed the Appellant's application for permission to apply for Judicial Review of the dismissal of his appeal against conviction, on 2 March 2012, relating to the conviction in respect of which the Restraining Order, imposed by Cardiff Magistrates', which was alleged to have been now breached.

11. The certificate of conviction, at last released to the Appellant by HM Court and Tribunals Service, states the 1^st or 9^th December 2011 dated Restraining Order was dependent upon the conviction for a breach in Section 2 of the said Act but Prosecution Exhibit 1 indicates the ‘served order' on the Appellant was that from a Section 4 Restraining Order dated 8^th December 2011.

12. His Honour's failure to conduct a ‘Vue de Justice' with the jury, following the custody officers in the both courts, employed by GEOamey Custody Services Ltd, confiscation of the Appellant's scale drawings of the Cardiff magistrates custody suite, where the alleged offence took place was an abuse in law.

13. His Honour's failure to grant an adjournment for medical attention or even access to his medication in the cells below, following GEOamey Custody Services' vicious assaults upon the Appellant, both on 1^st December 2011 and 4^th April 2012, was an abuse of process.

14. His Honour's failure to allow the Appellant sight of all the prosecution exhibits, eg website blog of 4^th December 2011 on http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/, on arrest, before caution and/or during the trial and sight of various jury ‘notes', passed to His Honour, following the Appellant's suggestion, in the course of the trial, was also wrong in law.

15. His Honour's failure to ever allow the Appellant sight of the original or sight of a certified true copy, of the Restraining Order, allegedly served on him, was also wrong in law.

16. His Honour's failure to order HM Prison, Cardiff to release the Appellant's legal papers and posted in court exhibits by his Mackenzie Friend, allow him proper access to facilities, in order to conduct is defence did nothing but to compound his difficulties and were further breaches in his rights under the Rule of Law.

17. In the alternative, at the appropriate time, His Honour failed to properly consider granting bail, out of custody, in the light of these apparent extreme and unusual circumstances, unable to find local legal representation, as was indicated by His Honour Judge Hugh Davies QC, on 7^th April 2012, in Cardiff Crown Court and by His Honour Judge Lambert in Bristol Crown Court, during an apparent application for bail well outside South Wales.

18. The Appellant therefore had an unfair trial and/or the said trial took place in breach of article 6(1) of the ECHR as incorporated by schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

"REAL POSSIBILITY" OF ACTUAL AND/OR PERCEIVED PREJUDICE AND/OR BIAS OF MR DAVID GARETH EVANS OF COUNSEL PROSECUTING FOR THE SOUTH WALES POLICE

1. Mr. David Gareth Evans of counsel ought not to have prosecuted the case against the Appellant as he was a potential prosecution or defence witness relating to the drawing up and purported ‘service of a ‘Restraining Order' signed? by District Judge Charles at Cardiff Magistrates' Court on 1^st December 2011.

2. An approach by the Appellant's Mackenzie Friend caused the CPS barrister to produce another version of Prosecution Exhibit One, ‘Restraining Order', not date stamped by the court. Prosecution Exhibit One included the court date stamp 9^th Dec 2011.

3. The prosecution barrister admitted, before the jury, a ‘draught' Restraining Order did still exist and was ordered to produce it, by the following day, by His Honour Judge John Curran.

4. There was discussion, quite wrongly before the jury, as to whether Mr. Evans would be called as a witness relating to the ‘drawing up' of the ‘Restraining Order and he indicated to His Honour Judge Curran that he would have to "seek advice from his professional body the Bar Council for England and Wales".

5. The court heard no more so the Appellant called him as a defence witness and was refused.

6. The Appellant was refused an adjournment in the light of late prosecution disclosure of relevant evidence germane to the original 1^st December 2011 conviction, upon which the Restraining Order relied.

7. Further evidence to support, unavailable in the time frame available, was the ‘contemporaneous note' made by the Appellant's solicitor of his client's memory of events on the 1^st December 2011, on 22^nd December2011, just two days before the Appellant's arrest and subsequent incarceration.

8. HM Cardiff prison's governors denied the Appellant proper client/solicitor/witness access, his access to his own funds for the defence or provide proper service of his letters/faxes/e-mails and telephone calls, to and from his solicitor, helpers or proposed witnesses controlled by MAPPA.

9. An issue had therefore arisen in the case as to what documents were allegedly served on the Appellant relating to the Restraining Order and as to whether one had been served as handwritten by District Judge Charles as there had been evidence adduced before the jury by way of unsworn submissions by Mr. Evans and by sworn evidence from those in the public gallery, that the former had handed up a draft of the proposed Restraining Order to District Charles for approval and that District Charles had written comments on it in order stating he withed to make the Restraining Order stronger (change to a Section 4 Order, ‘fear of violence').

10. There was a "real possibility" of actual and/or perceived bias as a result of Mr. Evans prosecuting the case, when he had made oral submissions to His Honour Judge Curran which were in effect the giving of evidence which was unsworn and in respect of which the Appellant was unable to challenge by way of cross-examine.

11. In fact the Appellant had been absent in the cells at Cardiff Magistrates' Court when the issue of the ‘Restraining Order' had been discussed by Mr. Evans with District Judge Charles on 1^st December 2011.

12. In addition, the relevant exchanges between Mr. Evans as prosecutor and His Honour Judge Curran were heard in the presence of the jury when they should have been ordered to retire, causing prejudice and bias in the Appellant's case.

The jury specifically asked for sight of the original, not copy, of both the GEOamey Custodial Services custody and clerk of the court's log and contemporaneous notes of evidence but the judge indicated, in the absence of the Appellant, that they were not relevant.

14 The Appellant therefore had an unfair trial and/or the said trial took place in breach of article 6(1) of the ECHR as incorporated by schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

LACK OF DISCLOSURE IN RESPECT OF THE APPELLANT

1. The prosecution failed to supply to the Appellant the complete log with handwritten notes and annotations of the custody records and cctv footage, kept by GEOamey Custodial Services, that had been in charge of security in the cells at Cardiff Magistrates' Court and also the notes made by Mr. Michael Williams, the Clerk of the Court and others at Cardiff Magistrates' Court.

2. Further, it emerged on 3 May 2012, during the trial that Mr. Evans was appearing in for the prosecution, he had handed up a draft of the ‘Restraining Order' to District Judge Charles on 1^st December 2011 and the learned District Judge had made handwritten additions to it with suggestions for making it stronger to be one under Section 4 of the Act.

3. There was an issue in the trial as to exactly which version of the ‘Restraining Order' had actually been served on the Appellant in the cells by the Security Officer Mr. Leigh Barker and so the existence of the copy of the ‘Restraining Order' with the handwritten additions made by District Judge Charles became an issue as the Appellant wished the jury to see it.

4. At the conclusion of the proceedings, on 3 May 2012, His Honour Judge Curran enquired as to the whereabouts of the version of the Restraining Order with the handwritten additional made by District Judge Charles and was told by Mr. Evans that it was at the CPS Headquarters in the Appellant's case file at Merthyr Tydfil.

5. Although His Honour Judge Curran directed that it be produced at the resumption of the proceedings, on 4 May 2012, only a computer print out of the amended restraining Order was produced and the jury was deprived of seeing either the original version with the handwritten additions, made by District Judge Charles or a certified true copy of the original 1^st December 2011 Restraining Order made on some date between 1^st and 9^th December 2011.

6. The Appellant had also again sought disclosure of the notes made by Mr. Michael Williams, the Clerk of the Court at Cardiff Magistrates' Court at the commencement of the proceedings, on 4 May 2012 but no order or any determination was made by His Honour Judge Curran for their production, instead, in the absence of the Appellant, informing the jury they, along with the prison and GEOmey Custodial Services records were not relevant.

7. Prior to trial His Honour knew the Appellant had received correspondence from Cardiff Magistrates stating he was not entitled to any court record other than the certificate of conviction for this and some currently seven ongoing summary cases, different but all related to this current appeal.

8. The Appellant therefore had an unfair trial and/or the said trial took place in breach of article 6(1) of the ECHR as incorporated by schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

CASE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WITHDRAWN FROM CONSIDERATION BY THE JURY

1. Although the Appellant didn't make any submissions of ‘no case to answer', after the close of the prosecution's case, His Honour Judge Curran should have withdrawn the case from the jury on the grounds that the evidence as it then stood, relating to the alleged service of the Restraining Order on the Appellant in the cell number three of Cardiff Magistrates' Court, on 1^st December 2011, was so unreliable that no jury properly directed could convict on that evidence.

2. Conflicting evidence had been given between the Clerk of the Court, Mr. Michael Williams and the Security Officer, Mr. Leigh Barker as to whether the Appellant had been serviced in one of the cells or in the corridor of the cell area below the Magistrates, whether he had been served with one or two separate documents, if at all and when put alongside their original but conflicting police witness statements, it is the Appellant's submission, that for this case to have even reached a jury was an abuse of process fueled by vengeance.

3. In addition, Mr. Barker had given evidence that he had read "Restraining Order" at the top of the document, that he had stated in evidence he had given to the Appellant but didn't give any evidence that the Appellant's name was on the document or that he had read the Appellant's name on the document in question.

4. There was a serious risk of doubt regarding the alleged service of the ‘Restraining Order' on the Appellant in the cell area of Cardiff Magistrates' Court by Mr. Barker on the Appellant.

5. In the premises, the Appellant's conviction is thereby rendered "unsafe" under section 2(1)(a) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

(CRIMINAL DIVISION)

THE QUEEN

- v -

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

_____________________________________________

GROUNDS OF APPEAL

_____________________________________________

49 Tynewydd Road, (for sale, 'cheap, cheap')

Barry,

CF62 8AZ

Appellant

Is Bristol Crown Court going to Conspire with Cardiff's Cabal?

Maurice — Sat, 26 May 2012 10:18:00 GMT

Cardiff Crown Court staff, ‘express an unease' to their being cross examined by the Appellant, the Crown Prosecution Service told a Bristol court today. One being an ex South Wales Police officer, a Derrick Hassan, now a court official who once supplied false forensic history to a doctor during a previous custody period reliant only on a section 36 of the 1983 Mental Health Act.

This was the continuing saga on how the HM Court Service (Wales), over these past twenty years, are determined to block my appeals, in either civil or criminal proceedings, from ever being aired in an English court room.

In this particular case, before Bristol Crown, was, you may think, the simple delivery of appeal documents at Cardiff Crown Court over a ‘Contempt of Court' conviction, now two years ago, my having already served its prison sentence. Procedure dictated that it was to be forwarded by Cardiff Crown Court to the Criminal Court of Appeal, in the Royal Courts of Justice, London. It was a dispute over Cardiff's Recorder, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC and his pointless Court Order in that it would ‘obtain' the medical evidence I so needed in order to stop severe pain by getting a long overdue total hip replacement operation.

Well, today, the appeal against ‘common assault conviction' was adjourned, in order I find a ‘defence lawyer'. If that failed it was for HM Partnership, including the worried Cardiff Crown Court staff, to apply for a Section 36 and so chose one of their own to be ‘cross examined' by!

Incestuous isn't it when you think that this very same Cardiff court officer, who had originally refused to accept my Criminal Court of Appeal papers, by pushing me down the stairs, causing the re breaking of my leg, may also now be protected, again, from my long awaited cross examination should this English court also succumb to contagion or infection.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/PushedDown-the-Stairs.aspx

This is a further indictment of the true state of our legal system, in Wales, with the English judge noting the alleged ‘common assault', on appeal, was committed as far back as July 2009. The conviction was obtained by trickery, in my absence, in November 2010 and was only finally completed in December 2011, by District Judge John Charles having milked its consequences to extreme, with a ‘no penalty'.

So, how do they keep doing it?

Easy, by ‘carte blanche' application of Section 36 of the Youth and Justice Criminal Evidence Act 1999, in order to protect their ‘Cardiff Cabal' and their ‘gravy train', anything to stop the basic right of a defendant cross examining the prosecution witnesses to obtain the truth.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/23/section/36

By August 2010 District Judge John Charles openly started this, their latest scam of denying all witnesses.

It had been implemented, quietly, for many years on LiPs in Wales and spectacularly, of late, applied part way through the January 2010 ‘WW1 machine gun' trial, with the jury's mind made up by the end of the first day. Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, that June, during the ‘Contempt of Court' debacle, had also denied me eye witnesses, access to my own medical records, anything to black mail me to employ one of their own.

By Charles instructing a lawyer from Newport to cross examine, using nana seconds of court time, he obtained the criminal conviction they all wanted. Well, not quite as it sounds, maybe, as I was not even there but Ihad been excused by court order, later backed by still more specialist medical reports, from both France and England.

The Newport lawyer did attend but cross examined no one, as was the case with the District Judge.

Wow, they thought, what a great new way to stitch up Maurice from now on!

We must do this more often. Four cases ‘out of the blue', on the same theme, promptly followed.

By September 2011 Charles had applied this 2^nd November 2010 summary conviction to lock me up for three months, pending still further conspiracies by South Wales Police, anything to prejudice my long outstanding civil damages claims.

Incidentally, this District Judge stated I had failed to attend that previous year's hearing there by compounding yet another conviction, one of failure to attend' he preferring to ignore his original reasoning for a Section 36.

A conveniently placed ‘Harassment' conviction, on the old theme, was again under his control, carrying the statutory sentence of 18 weeks, by statute, again equal to my remand time to the day of conviction. Oh how convenient. So who was surprised in that after the barrister, David Gareth Evans, had slipped in, at the very last moment, the needed extra ‘posted letter' incident to comply with statute to obtain a prison term in the first place!

My throwing this 7^th allegation, served on the day of trial, on the floor of the court had its desired effect. It was noted in the official court record and even The Glamorgan Gem newspaper, for the already drafted appeal.

And abuse of Section 35 in this next case? Yes, you guessed it; Charles refused me any cross examination again but this time by employing a lawyer from Swansea not forgetting, this time, the man was only answerable to the court and NOT to the Defendant.

He was therefore ordered to at least ‘go through the motions' of ‘cross examining'.

He asked both irrelevant questions and avoided the obvious ones. He, in fact, challenged no prosecution evidence what so ever, clearly caught on tape, the transcript of which is being published later. This lawyer was last seen running, with his quick £1,200 attendance fee tucked in his belt, for his Swansea train knowing, full well, much more was due now he had proved his allegiance.

Ah, no, I forget. He did come back, didn't he? Back to repeat the performance at the March 2012 Crown Court hearing, for my appeal before His Honour Judge PD Hughes QC. Again I was denied legal papers, witnesses etc.

2011 Christmas Eve was marked by my being jailed yet again, on the old theme, this time until mid May 2012, for an alleged ‘Breach of a Restraining Order' never served on me until pushed under a police cell door after my arrest. A nine month prison sentence had been arranged, this time, well in advance, with the usual release from custody to be on the predicted last day of trial.

Continuing this Section 36 abuse, however, was to be varied and worked on with much aplomb, as this next case had a lay jury with which to contend. A most unpredictable ‘creature' in this day and age of fast changing habits and social standards.

Basing the prosecution's usual strategy, on the general public's apparent fear of those employed in any court building, the judge and prosecution barrister arranged, therefore, the production only of court officials and policemen to give relevant evidence to obtain a conviction.

This jury and others, no doubt, risk the huge assumption that court clerks and custody officers, as employees from within a court building are to be trusted. Having stupidly replaced properly trained prison officers to do the job we now have too many ‘bully boys' with little training, little regard for the seriousness of their work that that seriously influence proceedings. It may well have been the reason for the jury's majority verdict.

That was a foregone conclusion, to me, once I was allowed no legal papers in court or facilities to interview my witnesses.

My websites may well give world wide exposure on just how Cardiff's so called ‘great and the good' continue to conspire to pervert the course of justice but while the police or judges continue to closing them down others will follow. Soon, I warn you, we will be far too many to jail at any one time.

A sample of what the jury may not have known about this case (to be later expanded in links etc).

Much needed reforms, anticipated in our judicial system, need to be considered alongside the following:

I was again to be blocked from cross examining their key prosecution witness, by application of Section 36 YJCEA 1999 but allowed, at last, to cross examine others. So what is this evil lot up to this time?

The surprising CPS barrister's opening speech, late removal of a key witness and frank admission he, as Her Majesty's Crown Court representative, should not be conducting the case, he being called as a defence witness, was but part of this pitiful story.

The Section 36 ‘court appointed lawyer', to ‘cross examine', had failed to attend despite a string of albeit clandestine but publicly recorded Crown and Cardiff Magistrate Court hearings and Orders on the matter.

One was amongst the defence evidence gently secreted just anterior to my anterior anal sphincter, ready for disclosure, hopefully from a great height.

HM Cardiff prison, GEOamey Custody Services and His Honour Judge John Curran QC, had refused either my legal papers or medication being in the court.

To a casual observer in the public gallery, for what was the usually concocted Cardiff cabal conspiracy, this now having the potential of something similar to a Whitehall Theatre farce.

For the jury to be refused, despite asking by ‘jury notes', to see what record both court and custody services are kept, of a service of a court document, I have all seen before. So what other exhibits would the jury ‘not be allowed to examine' if I bothered to give evidence, called witnesses and obtained the cctv?

Court cases are usually won or lost, in Cardiff, based on who has the most deceitful lawyer on their side. Successful withholding of evidence, failed ‘disclosure', is the name of the game. The veracity and mental state of presiding judge, prosecutor and or South Wales Police invariably influences the final outcome.

http://www.john-cooper.info/new_folder/disclosure%20is%20the%20crown%20complying%20with%20its%20duty.pdf

To even contemplate prosecuting Cardiff's court, prison or police services, for civil damages, a jury trial, for example, has to first ‘collapse', be ‘withdrawn part heard' by the CPS' or ‘be stopped' by the presiding judge. Above all, the Defendant must never, except in rare occasion, call defence evidence if he thinks he, his family or even his long suffering friends in the public gallery, will ever get reimbursed, following acquittal, of even their bus fares.

CPS barrister David Gareth Evans to then go on and admit that, yes, I had been handed a piece of paper in my cell, on 1^st December 2011, by their star lying witness, Geoamey Custody Services manager, Leigh Barker and yes, containing District Judge John Charles' very own ink from his fountain pen scribbled through three lines of CPS type, should of also of stopped this trial ‘dead in its tracks'.

Approx copy of notes taken by Defendant's solicitor before jury trial

Restraining Order - Not in Court

CPS came into cell - handwritten an(d) print 2/3 lines.

Refused to leave prison until given something in writing - and was then out.

Went to Court and asked for copy of what convicted for.

Also contacted Crown - who had file.

Inc. "derogatory"

The CPS barrister then went on to admit, Oh yes, that piece of scribbled on paper was initially sent down for Mr Kirk's ‘approval', to draught an order and that it had been ‘left behind' in his Merthyr Tydfil office. This was all sparked off in court by my McKenzie Friend, Mr Merion Bowen, forcing the CPS to even disclose still further yet undisclosed documents! These other drafts were uncovered in the face of the court and still the judge did not stop the trial knowing ,full well, I had written for them many weeks before.

If that was not enough, to stop proceedings, this issue was compounded, yet again, by the judge now actually pretending to order the disclosure of ‘District Judge John Charles' hand written note to me, a small matter I had been asking for, for months, along with the overhead cctv, capturing the lot, with both custody and court contemporaneous record that MUST GO BEFORE THE JURY.

Even the visiting solicitor to the prison, before the jury trial took place, took contemporaneous note of all this gross irregularity and e-mailed me his typed record. His quiet ‘negotiations' with CPS have, so far, failed to materialise the sensible way forward for all involved.

Further ‘Grounds of Appeal' papers, to the London, must go via Cardiff court within the next few days.

But I have to personally deliver them to Cardiff Crown Court, possibly to Derrick Hassan again!

Deja Vu?

http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/

(Links and court docs to be added shortly)