Search results matching tag 'CAA'

CAA Flying Licence Returned Despite Dr Tegwyn Wiliams DOWNLOAD EVIDENCE

Maurice — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:41:17 GMT

So why did it take so long to arrive since its creation?

CAA 'Trapper' Stamps Maurice's Log Book - eBay Auster Sale STARTS

Maurice — Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:15:00 GMT

After 2 hours of examination, on the ground and aloft, exhausted Maurice is handed back a much appreciated 'debrief' and a Renewal Stamp in his flying log book!

It was 31 years ago when Maurice last flew a PA 28 Cherokee 'spam can' on a similar GFT, General Flight Test, but that was at Oxford for his UK Commercial Licence.

This means the stranded yellow Cub in Texas, subject to CAA Head Office immediately lifting the suspension, can be flown on to the Amazon, Agentina and Falklands this autumn if kind President Bush grants Maurice a Visitor's Visa?

Kirstie is likely to find, in a few days, another little J3 L4 1943 D-Day Piper Cub tucked up in her stable (MY HANGAR) here at St Donats International Airport being hastily prepared for flight to Cape Town or will it be Mount Everest?

Meanwhile, in order to pay mounting bills, eBay receives Maurice's first of many aircraft, engines and 40 propellors to sell off!

Royal Prerogative takes my My Pilot's Licence

Maurice — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:19:00 GMT

I have today received a Refusal by the Royal Courts of Justice to interfere with the CAA's decision to suspend my flying licences, months ago, just because the US Department of Homeland Security told the CAA I had landed on President Bush's front lawn and was ‘engaged in criminal activity' while both the FAA, local newspaper and McClellan County Sheriff say did not happen.

I enclose for my reader(s) an extract of the judgment to be appealed, the common theme, incidentally, relied on by not just by the RCVS, South Wales Police and Crown Prosecution Service but now the CAA.

Why? To deliberately withhold disclosure of favourable evidence because each HM department is immune to prosecution under the seriously out dated and outrageous contradiction in terms to to Basic Human Rights, namely ‘Her Majesty's Royal Prerogative'.

Extract of Royal Courts of Justice

Judgment 23^rd July 2008-07-26

Maurice Kirk v Civil Aviation Authority

‘Observations'

The wide ranging nature of article 27(1) (b) of the Air Navigation Order and of the discretion to suspend granted by Article 92(1) of the ANO is more than ample to confer jurisdiction the CAA to as it has done.

No error in law or other arguable basis for challenging the decision to suspend the applicant's private pilot's licence is disclosed by the application.

House of Commons Demonstration Tuesday 22nd July 2008

Maurice — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:13:00 GMT

To be addressed by Dr Vincent Cable MP, Liberal Democrat Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer and other MPs

22 July 2008 at 09.00

Demonstration starts 9.00 am on the 22nd July outside the Central London County Court and at 9.00 am at Brentford County Court. The group at Brentford County Court will join those at the Central London County Court at 11.00am. We will go on to the Royal Courts of Justice and The Law Society.

Between 2- 4pm MPs will address the demonstration in Committee Room 6 in Parliament. Enter through the main visitor entrance, which is at Cromwell Green, just off Parliament Square

42 Augustine Road

Harrow Weald, London

HM Partnership/RCVS/South Wales Police/Civil Aviation Authority

Dear Patrick, 19^th July 2008

CAA Thursday Meeting to consider Revoking all my Pilots Licences.

Thank you, kind sir, for attending yet again another example of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and now, the Civil Aviation Authority, apparent joint determination to prevent me from having income to fight the corruption in the South Wales Police and British Law Courts, dominated by crooked lawyers.

Remember the police were the original complainants to have me struck off the veterinary register following their loss of 121 criminal charges out of around 130 laid against me in the barbaric environment of a UK ‘HM' controlled court room. There is still no apparent ‘accountability', after 10 years of harassment and false imprisonments, for almost daily nefarious conduct including their failed ‘disclosure', ‘perjury' and general ‘perversion of justice'.

The Civil Aviation Authority removed my licences upon ‘communication' from Texas, USA, that they now accept was utter nonsense. I did not land my aging Piper Cub ‘on the road outside President Bush's ranch' nor was I ‘engaged in criminal activity and endangering the general public,' as the US Department of Homeland Security hurriedly stated to justify jailing me and then having me deported like some common criminal. The FAA confirmed, at the time, I HAD COMMITTED NO OFFENCE.

The CAA have now chosen to bring up ‘old matters', just like the RCVS did when the South Wales Police complaint collapsed, in order to justify not just removing my veterinary licence but giving it back. Meanwhile, my Royal Courts of Justice Judicial Review Applications are being deliberately buried by the usual HM Masonic cabal that currently dominates the UK judiciary.

The RCVS relied on, remember, a string of ‘trivial' motoring convictions obtaining the HM Privy Council outrageous quote that, in effect, all professions must now make their members conduct their private lives as if ‘acting in a professional capacity'! [See para 33 KIRK v RCVS 19^th Jan 2004 Privy Council Judgment]. That, Patrick, indicates just how serious the state our courts are really in and why the CAA can also act with impunity under ‘Her Majesty's Prerogative'.

The CAA's continuing refusal to return my licences is, you witnessed, based on five points:

1. I negligently or deliberately engaged the aircraft in a thunder storm whilst landing in a field five miles from the US President's ranch. Landing in order to deliver, personally, my letter of thanks for the US Coast Guard saving my life. I would never have made breakfast, except for the sharks!

CAA evidence was based only on what was written on http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/ about inclement weather.

2. I had ditched my ‘Liberty Girl' in the Caribbean, one hundred miles off the Dominican Republic.
3. I had landed her on a street of Kanazawa City, Japan, three years ago, destroying her with myself finishing up in hospital.

Apparently, you heard, the CAA takes the view that a single engined aircraft should neither cross water beyond gliding distance to land nor, in the case of the Japanese incident, fly over mountainous terrain despite being generally designed for the purpose. The mere fact my engine failed more than ten miles from the Japanese city was apparently irrelevant but the fact the mountain range had nothing, not even for a cub to land in and live, meant I should not have been there in the first place!

4. Four years ago emergency services were alerted following a call by a member of public that my Taylorcraft was experiencing engine trouble over the Bristol Channel.

The fact I made no such assumption to request help but landed at Bristol instead of nearby Chivenor, Devon, is now also being held against me.

5. Record keeping omissions of biannual flight test instructor/examiner requirement.

Having spent the money to employ these professionals it appeared, correctly I must say, I had failed to properly record the purpose of the exercise...flight safety. The fact a string off pilots, purported to be qualified, took my money both here in the UK and the USA, did not appear to concern them. I hope I was mistaken. Since the hearing I have found out one such professional later refused to sign up my books as his wife was killed in the very same aircraft shortly after my two hours of instruction with him.

Patrick, the Home Secretary still refuses to hand over the £15,000 awarded by the court for one of the fourteen South Wales false imprisonments so I think it is time to cause just a little more trouble in London, on Tuesday, than what they might expect of a man ‘wishing to conduct his private life in accordance with their lordships' wishes' in order he may ‘practice veterinary surgery' before he dies.

Yours sincerely,

Maurice 2

President Bush Witnesses 'Found' & Air Navigation Order contrary to Human Rights Act?

Maurice — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:07:16 GMT

With CAA litigation looming again, it reminds me of the 70s. The 'intimidation of witnesses', burly ex Met cops banging on doors in the dead of night in Bristol, a Hampshire magistrate's case deliberately staged with orchestrated press 2 page spread coverage about 'Captain Kirk and the Star Ship Enterprise' just days before a TRIAL by JURY deliberating on my ATPL flying career, while I was completing an instructor's course at Goodwood......

And another case....about a vintage Stampe biplane flown unlawfully by others, a year after it is sold by me, but I am the one remanded for six weeks in 'solitary' in HM Winchester prison, below ground and beaten up by the prison guards (one called Clark, in particular)......before the trial that disclosed the CAA had given immunity to the pilots, in order to be a prosecution witness, in a case that failed without a penny compensation.

And another case of being 'pilot in command' leaving a closed airport in the dead of night they already having statements from the pilot of the aeroplane to the contrary.

And another... proposed drop over Somerset at 3am.... No, that one is for the book!

And there was that other failed case of the £11,000 bribe by the prosecution barrister and CAA solictor, mid trial, using tax payer's money, for me to change my plea to 'guilty' for something they knew damned well, 'low flying', I could not have done. Two commercial pilots had already given written statements to the CAA that the aircraft, G-KIRK, 'landed'!........ the RCVS are not the only ones in the UK dependent on the 'Royal Prerogative', the 'immunity to prosecution' clause guaranteeing 'invincible prejudice' to continue in our courts.

And the USA still crave for a monarchy?

Mr R Britton, Legal Department, CAA, London

30^th June 2008

Royal Courts of Justice Judicial Review Application CO/49/46/200

Dear Sir,

It is nearly 2 months since the CAA suspended my licences based on the information attached to the defence papers. The FAA confirmed to me, at the time, that I had committed no aviation offence.

I apply for full disclosure, for the above hearing, under the Freedom of Information Act, Data protection Act and CPR rules of discovery.

Full disclosure is to include all other information relating to me before Mr Stephen Williams and referred to in your internal communications with the Licensing Department of the CAA.

It is quite unreasonable not to revalidate my licences now, based on the material so far disclosed.

Yours faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk

EYE WITNESSES FROM PRESIDENT BUSH'S RANCH

1st July 2008 e-mail to CAA

To whom it may concern,

Brian Throop of the FAA in Washington D.C stated to me on 6/20/08 via telephone that as far as he knew there were no known airspace infractions or FAA violations made by Mr. Maurice Kirk. I have also spoken with Mr. Throop on several occasions in regards to Mr. Kirk. Tel: (202) 538-9013.

Also on 5/01/08 in taking Mr. Kirk back to his aircraft in Crawford, Texas. Mr. Arnold Theymeyer of the FAA in Ft. Worth Texas had a phone conversation with Mr. Kirk stating that he had committed no offenses, and was given authorization to fly his aircraft. My wife, Kandy Howell was also present and spoke with Mr. Arnold Theymeyer.

Alvin M. Howell

Private Pilot/Airframe and Power Plant Technician/Inspection Authorization with 36 years experience in the aviation industry. Have had a US private pilot's license since 1974. I also work for Standard Aero located at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston as a QA inspector on corporate Business Jets.

My wife and I have a business that provides Safety Compliance Training to Aviation Maintenance Certified Repair Stations.

AMT Training Solutions

http://www.amt-1.com/

Thanks for your time

Sincerely

Alvin M. Howell
22715 Piper Rd
Needville, Tx. 77461

(979) 553-3040 home
(281) 974-6593 cell

Safety Regulation Group, Civil Aviation Authority, UK                            Article 13 ECHR ‘Right to an effective remedy'



7th July 2008

                                      Meeting 17^th July, London ‘Suspended Pilot Licence'     your ref 10D/006/005/001

Dear Mr Alcott,
I am in receipt of your 1st July 2008 letter and with which I am most disappointed.

However, it appears you have now accepted information from the Department of Homeland Security, USA, was erroneous and my landing in a field, five miles from President Bush's Crawford Ranch, not on his front lawn or public road outside his front gate, ‘engaged in criminal activity and endangering life', did not constitute ‘substantive' action on my licences. The FAA, I understand, have also given me their blessing on the incident.

But now you wish to raise old incidents, some dating back four years. This tactic, I must say, appears remarkably similar to that of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons when first contacted by the South Wales Police, for the HM Crown Prosecution Service, having lost 121 charges out of 130 against me. Their combined 10 year campaign of harassment and deceit started in 1992 and only appeared to diminish on 29^th May 2002, the very day my name was removed from the veterinary register. Both RCVS and South Wales Police continue to refuse to disclose evidence that will undermine their defence confident, of course, under the immunity of the ‘Royal Prerogative'.

I therefore require your full disclosure also for the Royal Courts of Justice for your continuing refusal to re instate.

As conduct by the above so mimics that of the Guernsey Insular Authority, when they stole both my business and personality in the 80s, I must ask what continuing ‘devil worship' influence there is to now involve the CAA?

You raise fresh issues:

1. ‘Failed to take adequate action to avoid the thunderstorm'[at Mr Bush's ranch]. What thunder storm?

2. ‘The ditching of a cub in the Caribbean'. Upon what information do you rely in respect of my fitness?

3. ‘Forced landing on a closed road on the edge of Kanazawa City, Japan'. Are you suggesting I destroyed these aircraft on purpose? Did not the Japanese CAB supply you with GPS record of the exact point of engine failure many miles up a mountainous range, not even fit for a J3 cub to force land in?

4. ‘In 2004 a Taylorcraft caused ‘overdue action' by ‘search and rescue'. As with the RCVS I suggest full disclosure to support your allegations and as to why none of these matters were raised earlier?

I have invited a Patrick Cullinane Esq. to attend our meeting he having suffered similar ‘failed disclosure' by HM Inland Revenue and also witnessed the appalling state of our Royal Courts of Justice on my numerous Judicial Review Applications on ‘disclosure' indicating none of you have any ‘accountability' for possible malfeasance.

Yours Sincerely,

Maurice J Kirk

CAA proposed impartial meeting on the17th July 2008

8th July 2008

So who is the Racist?

Dear Madam,

Interesting choice of interrogators, as if it was not predicted.

I have had a number of communications, only this day, on the very subject of racism possibly being at the bottom line of this deceit with the welsh courts and treatment by the Freemasons in the RCVS?

Now we have the CAA!

Had I been black and landed in Crawford, Texas, I may be now be 3 feet under in a swamp, in a surplus Vietnam body bag. But that is elsewhere.

The welsh police complained to the RCVS to get me 'struck off', in order to deny me income to fight them, having just lost their 100^{th odd} charge against me.

A Swansea judge then refused me a jury trial for compensation of 10 years of intense harassment by those very same welsh police.

Lord Justice Williams refused me legal representation on the very same subject for a jury trial at the Royal Courts of Justice Appeal in his nanoseconds of deliberations in July 2007 before me and a Patrick Cullinane Esq.

A Mr Justice Lloyd Jones, only last month in the Royal Courts of Justice, clearly ignored the fact that the RCVS have decided they can now refuse re instatement or ‘strike off' a veterinary surgeon from the veterinary register without even a hearing with the disciplinary committee.

Despite judgment against him in a welsh court the Home Secretary refuses to pay me the money for false imprisonment last year instigated by a welsh court on welsh police information they knew ,damned well, was false. Racist or what?

Not one welsh newspaper has published the fact or I have won 121 out of `130 charges in 6 or 7 welsh Crown courts in Wales and countless Magistrate similar farces and it is not based on Racism?

And now you offer me a ‘Mr Williams' to decide my, possibly, last year of flying as ‘pilot in command'!

Oh, yes, do bring on your ‘Mr Williams' to decide whether I can fly as long as I can have CAA's Mr B Alcott's personal consent to publish Mr Stephen Williams's and other people's ‘internal memos' in the CAA created due to ‘racist intent' but will be obtained, eventually, by me, by the true letter of the law or similar bribes as with RCVS staff that have proved to have been so successful.

I suggest you look at the sample of HM Solicitor General internal memos leaked and published on ‘downloads' of http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/

Oh yes, I will look around, instead of a lawyer for the ‘meeting', I will bring someone else, particularly familiar on the subject of racism, the very reason why this country is in such a bloody mess since Enoch died.

Mr Stephen Williams would not be a freemason and worshipper of the devil by any chance?

from

Maurice J Kirk, white Caucasian, English born and bred but forced to live in Wales originally due to racist unchecked conduct in Guernsey, Channel Islands.

CAA, Gatwick, UK

                                  Royal Courts of Justice Judicial Review Application

                                              Maurice Kirk v Civil Aviation Authority

Dear Ms Gregory,                                                                                                                            9^th July 2008

Re Suspended Pilots licence.                                                                                                Pre Litigation Protocol

Further to my letter of 8^th July I have considered it would be appropriate, in the current climate with usual absence of full disclosure and for the CAA's decision to suspend my licences and write off to other licencing worldwide, that the meeting be tape recorded and that if any issues relating to the 1998 Human Rights Act have been raised in the past, in other cases, I should have site of them.

If new staff of the CAA is deciding my case history then let them be made well aware that the revocation of my commercial licence, in 1981 was, I believe, unlawful and that the failed disclosure was significant. In that incident, November 1979 Cessna 150 night flight from Morlaix, France to Bournemouth, I was not the pilot [except using the radio to correct South Hampton Radar information to my pilot in adverse weather], I was not drunk nor registered owner of the aircraft. The threats, in the dead of night that followed, on the young inexperienced Bristol pilot by ex Metropolitan police bully boys were also unlawful.

The latest incident was when the CAA barrister waxed eloquent to the Taunton magistrates, around 1998, following my deliberate plea of ‘Guilty' to ‘low flying', lying through her back teeth that I had ‘endangered life', contrary to section 74 etc. not even on the charge sheet! I quietly changed my plea to ‘Not Guilty' as I had landed ‘in accordance with normal aviation practice', later accepted by the Crown Court judge when no defence evidence was tendered [2 CAA prosecution witnesses, commercial pilots, confirmed a landing]. The CAA continues to refuse to identify her name for complaint to the Bar Council.

Another incident fabricated due, I suspect, to Masonic devil worship needs clarification. Remanded in Winchester prison, circa 1980, beaten up in solitary confinement, all for a CAA case that collapsed in Southampton Crown Court with, again, not a penny compensation or an apology.

The bribe of tax payer's money by the CAA of £11,000 for me to change my plea back to ‘guilty', put in writing, is an indication why tape recording and European Law, need to be addressed now.

‘Flight Safety' is of paramount importance but it is my opinion that the powers invested in the 2005 Air Navigation Order, for CAA personnel to do their job, is both draconian and contrary to the 1998 Human Rights Act with little allowance given for ‘accountability ‘ for any act of malfeasance it hiding, as with the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, behind Her Majesty's skirts and HM Partnership.

I put both the CAA and RCVS on notice, following the Law Lords decision this week to waiver the 6 year, time bar rule in civil actions for damages that I may now sue without further notice given.

Yours faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk

COPY TO RCVS

T-Shirt from 'Down Under'

Maurice — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:14:00 GMT

Last Monday in the Royal Courts of Justice the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons won the case having prevented me from going before the jury of the college in an application to 'practice veterinary surgery'. The chairman alone stated, in effect, if I accept the college and South Wales Police did no wrong I can go before the disciplinary committee with my application to work. Without that public apology you get nothing. Brian Jennings, Privy Council agent, failed to refer to the fact Her Majesty's Privy Council has the power under the 1966 Act to intervene when immunity to prosecution, under the college's Royal Charter, appears to be 'excessive' but I am not holding my breath.

Leaving the special aroma of that court building and with the judgment of Mr Justice Lloyd Jones still ringing in my ears, yet another Welshman, incidentally, refusing the right of a jury [ Lord Justice Thomas had only lately refused me a jury to sit on the 15 year running case of police harassment in Old South Wales] I recieve a missive from New South Wales. Dear John Wilson, the Aussie exponent of jury trials, is sending me a T-shirt suitably worded !

Now Magna Carter Day, the almost origin of a jury concept, was on Sunday and demonstration in Whitehall on the 22nd July is taking a bus load of supporters from Cardiff wearing, I hope, John's T-Shirt.

Monday also had me in Kingsway, around the corner at CAA House, badgering the legal department on the 'facts', relied on from the US, that caused them to have my 'wings clipped', while I struggle with the french language to obtain a Gallic 'brevet de pilotage'. The Emergency Judicial Review lodged against the CAA will, no doubt, be shredded by now.

Monday night is part spent having a chinese supper with Alex, youngest son at Uni, on the River Thames in Kingston, before bedding down on a bench at Heathrow for 8 am flight to Detroit, the home of 'Motown' music.

Tuesday was fascinating ....watching the huge Department of Homeland Security sausage machine again at work exporting vistors from the US, except with me, apparently, irrespective of cost, rhyme nor reason. All worth it though for the interrogation by Angel, a vivacious afro-caribbean, suggesting to me the 'need to know basis', no 'audit trail' and 'the system' of visa disposal having a whole new meaning to a very naive Englishman. The UK should consider their system and save the tax payer a fortune.

Wednesday back at the Royal Courts of Justice to lodge the appeal from the RCVS nonsense and u tube video, for the lazy reader! Itseems to me, looking at more leaked memos it is rare for any file, lodged, to be opened, yet alone read in that building!

Wednesday night by train and home to St Donats and Genevieve is out on her new pony. Must get Baldrick in, tack up and slim down [the horse] for the fox hunting this Autumn. If I cannot fly in UK Airspace and have to fight the CAA again through the courts for the next two years I might as well hunt, buy a bigger bike and write to Mr Bush, before he leaves office, for the 'US Presidential Pardon'.

Meanwhile, the US cub is patiently waiting, hidden away in a small strip in Texas, for that dash across the Rio Grande to South America and the Falklands as my french 1943 L4 cub is about to leave the nest in Hampshire and my UK 1943 L4 cub is hidden in the West country, without Kirstie knowing, awaiting the outcome of the CAA's deliberations as to whether her UK registration is to be changed to a Z- , may be, or an F- to assist my circumnavigation of Africa on a foriegn licence or not?

CAA Disclosure Request

Maurice — Sat, 31 May 2008 05:24:31 GMT

Much confusion, it appears, in UK General Aviation on bi-annual licence validation done in the US

What About the South Wales Police?

Maurice — Fri, 30 May 2008 14:43:00 GMT

15 years ago I started a civil litgation action for harassment following conduct by the local police including jailing me on an almost weekly basis. To date they have lost 121 criminal charges and won 9. These they served on the RCVS in 2000, the police also giving them access to confidential files in both Cardiff and Barry police stations.

It is of particular interest for our family that it has taken the USA to cause the CAA to face proper 'disclosure', now implicating the South Wales Police, who are behind just why I was deported and earlier struck off the register for life as a veterinary surgeon.

The attached file is just an indication to the uninitiated of the lengths to which these faceless people will go just for vengence, all at the tax payers' expense.

I submit another ignored application for disclosure download here

CAA Erroneous Data

Maurice — Fri, 30 May 2008 06:52:00 GMT

I will be publishing on this blog the 'blow by blow' account of my fight to regain my flying licence and posting the 'heavy' documents such as correspondence, newspaper accounts and the evidence within the downloads section of the site (see the link on the main menu above).

It is my submission, today, that the CAA Licencing Department have been given significantly contradictory and erroneous information from the USA.

The FAA have confirmed, more than once, that I had committed no US aviation offence by landing in a field at Crawford, Texas and other US Authorities have knowingly engaged in nefarious conduct so as to have me re-arrested, a week later, purely on a pretext to have me deported. This is clearly indicated in the papers so far released to the CAA some of which, but not all, have been disclosed to me.

What is significantly disturbing in all this was being refused the right to a 'caution', the right to 'make a statement' and to have an independent medical examination throughout my three weeks in custody. My 10 days in solitary confinement without any access to telephone, to inform my family where I was, create or receive mail, use my $4000, have visitors, contact the British Embassy, have legal representation or independent medical examination at my expense, is fact. The deliberate policy of 'minimum audit trail' from the moment guns were pointed at my head leaves me in further difficulties with the CAA who may decide to act only on what they are given.

This fear is real, owing to the 'huge assumptions' revealed in the numerous, yet to be published, CAA memos by the Licencing Department, so far released to me when I know the Royal Courts of Justice will conduct their 'responsibilities', in my lodged Judicial Review Application, in a manner to which both I and many, many others have been so accustomed.

The US Department of Homeland Security, created post 9/11, blocked almost all media coverage in the US, refused to submit any documentary evidence to support their allegations for my removal from the US, now needed for the CAA and the Royal Courts of Justice, on the repetitive argument that -

"NO DHS detained British holiday-maker on a 'Waiver Visa' into USA is allowed access to legal redress as agreed by Her Majesty's UK Government."

Read the 12 page PDF under the download section of this site for more information - newspaper cuttings, CAA Memo, CAA letter to MJ Kirk, and US charge sheet, later withdrawn.

CAA Case 30th May 2008

Maurice — Fri, 30 May 2008 02:55:44 GMT

It is Mr Kirk's submission to the CAA Licencing Department that they have been given significantly contradictory and erroneous information from the USA.