Search results matching tags 'Abuse of Process' and 'Royal Courts of Justice'

A Sample of 'What Daily goes on in our UK Law Courts'

Maurice — Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:00:00 GMT

13th October 2015 1st Dec 2011 Cardiff Magistrates Harassment Conviction Failed Disclosure contrary to Criminal Procedure Rules While I continue to scour the country for a solicitor, to accept instructions for simple disclosure of court records, I will list again what is needed to clear my name of six imprisonments, amounting to three years of my life, deliberately concocted by the South Wales Police simply to prejudice our multiple civil proceedings. 1. Full magistrates court records of the twelve hearings and especially those of the clerk of the court. 2. Copies of all of the prosecution exhibits especially the ones slipped in, on the day of the substantive hearing, suggesting a missive was sent by the victim to Caswell Clinic, Bridgend's police chief psychiatrist. 3. Why was their victim repeatedly denied copies of the magistrate's court exhibits needed to fight the appeal? 3. Full court records of 1st April 2012 Cardiff Crown Court appeal against harassment conviction. 4. Evidence relied on by 4th May 2012 trial judge (1st 'breach of a restraining order') when informing the jury, following their jury note to him, that the magistrates' records were 'not available'. 5.Evidence before Their Lordships, in March 2013, when their reason to refuse the appeal was because no evidence was sent from the Cardiff Crown Court, in the first place, that the jury had asked to see the clerk of the court's notes. Jury had specifically asked for clerk's contemporaneous notes following his hiding in a cell. 6. Full copy of the original court records obtained by the Crown Prosecution Service on, admitted, at least three occasions following alterations to them, each time, by others. 7. Full copy of the magistrate's court records, by February 2012 when copied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission following the victim’s complaint that he had no knowledge of any such 'retaining order ' having been handed down yet alone served on him! 8. Full copy of the victim's immediate 'gate arrest' police records following his release on 1st December 2011 from the Cardiff magistrates' cell that will also record no ‘restraining order’ was given to their prisoner. 9. The identity and full records of the Geoamey Custodial Services officers, on duty that day, who can each give evidence to clear this police victim's name. Why is it, time and time again in our British judicial system, where HM Partnership individuals get ‘found out’ but are privileged to be immune to prosecution, their victims, instead, are made to suffer all the more? Maurice J Kirk BVSc SEE http://.www.butlincat.wordpress.com Who will help Maurice to go to Royal Courts of Justice and European Court?

Another Frustrating Day in our Parliament Building

Maurice — Wed, 24 Jun 2015 06:13:00 GMT

Busy day for me, yesterday, in Parliament committee rooms- First there was 'child abuse' meeting and then 'whistle blower' almost a riot of over a hundred fearful followers and victims as persecuted 'whistle blowers'. Then, if not sublime to the ridiculous, in the very same room was NOMS with entourage including the new Justice Minister, Mr Michael Gove.......the discussion covered lawyer greed , would you believe? . . No Sabine K McNeil there, alas, of Victims Unite.com.etc . So, what are you lot out there going to do about her current predicament as the 'Queen Bee' on so many disputed issues in our current out dated UK judicial system?.. , BUT first we had an organised demo outside that building, Royal Courts of Justice, for Sabine, one of the original brains at Cern in the 70s who created that nebulous thing none of you can touch....cyberspace. SO, what are you going to do? . Sabine K McNeill (@SabineMcNeill) | Twitter . See More later

South Wales Police Covert Serveillance Case Dramatically Shortened by High Court Section 42 Proposed Ruling

Maurice — Wed, 12 Jun 2013 05:54:00 GMT

HARASSMENT?

In a minute I visit my sixth GP practice in another desperate attempt to have someone in the NHS (Wales) to finally correct my Caswell Clinic 2009 psychiatric Records fabricated then purely to have me registered MAPPA level 3 if the 'machine gun' allegation failed.

South Wales Police had and still have a 'hold' over him and his wife and yet no one else in the NHS system, appropriately qualified will be a seen correcting my medical records that are currently stopping me now from setting off to South Africa and the Falkland Islands in my WW2 D-Day Piper Cub, registration G-KURK.

This CPS barrister had every opportunity to rectify the anomaly, not once , not twice but at least seven times in a series of 'harassment' and then 'reach of restraining orders' vindictive prosecutions, anything to block the starting my 20 year running three month damages claim and allow proof exposed of a thoroughly deceitful doctor SUPPORTED BY THE SYSTEM

The Chief Constable of South Wales Police

Bridgend HQ

16^th June 2013

Dear Sir,

Statement of Complaint

Theft

I have now had a number of articles, including my post, stolen from my Cardiff flat. I keep the flat locked at all times when I am not there and there is a very short list of those with duplicate keys.

Criminal Damage

Would this relate to your officers failing to recover stolen articles from my car, the week before last or allow me to identify the culprit who broke into my car, outside the flat, by my viewing the CCTV?

Fraud

Does this relate to anything over a short conversation I had, only this week with a neighbour, over my having been reported for fraud, apparently and also deception but possibly explaining why police had to attend my flat premises for over an hour and requiring a paddy wagon?

Damages Claims against South Wales Police & NHS (Wales)

Could this also relate to the ongoing civil damages claims, in Cardiff County Court, against yourself or the pending one million pound damages claims, malicious prosecutions, some being relisted later this week? They include the strange case over some old WW1 machine gun attached to a replica WWI biplane and another over the covering up NHS (Wales) staff and a police psychiatrist?

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/_A300_100_2C00_000-Machine-Gun-Reward.aspx

(After a 'rabbit shoot')

12 04 21 MJK REDACTED Psychiatric Summary.pdf

Barricaded Flat Entrance

Is my finding that I am now separated from my own legal papers in the flat, some due for delivery to the County Court, today, is of your doing or can I ask for your officers attendance in order that I may force an entry?

Could I have your intentions, please?

Yours

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

P.S. The last time this flat required police assistance, on 6^th June 1993, your then Chief Inspector Brian Genner, with the help of Sergeant Brian Roe, used a crow bar and a sledge hammer to gain entry but causing his own daughter to miscarriage all of which, apparently, was blamed on me.

95 07 22 Sgt Roe St.pdf

A photo of police (an inspector and sergeant, apparently) outside my Cardiff flat

13 06 12 Police Complaint re Tax Payer's money.docx

13 06 14 Claimant Position Statement BS614159.docx

No more 'HM' court time has been 'allocated' or the trial judge just wishes not to hear any more evidence, apparently,for the completion of this Claimant's twenty year running damages claims leaving only the 'closing speeches' on 23rd July 13 to finish the case, subject to any appeal.

It is arguable that these and other cases, in the long stayed queue, have been delayed by those who really decide as to just what goes on in our UK law courts. The Claimant's consequential loss, following his countless imprisonments and being sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act so many times, of carefully stored evidence has been phenomenal.

On the promise of a jury, as far back as1993, the Claimant instructed Bristol lawyers to bring a series of damages claims against the South Wales Police in an attempt to simply to stop the harassment and finally 'get them off his back' when all he wished to do was to go about his chosen vocation, uninterrupted, as a veterinary surgeon in the Vale of Glamorgan.

From June 1993, in Cardiff and between December 1992 to October 1993, in Barry, following a series of arson, motoring and tenancy dispute incidents, requiring the Claimant to seek assistance from his local constabulary, chance communications with the wrong Guernsey police officers led to, some would say, an act of vengeance and damned what it cost.

Some within the Barry and Cardiff police then set about a 'course of conduct' argued by the Claimant as both unusual and extreme acts of bullying heavily reliant on their 'HM' Partnership's cosy relationship from within their own courts hoping their chosen victim would not make the distance.

Twenty years on and the Claimant now finds himself faced with recent court rulings appearing to both shorten proceedings and indicate the need, perhaps, for the maintaining or otherwise of the age old 'hot potato', the level of a 'judge's discretion' in this, such an unusual case.

Could the rulings relate to this 5th August 2003 HM Treasury Solicitor letter, I wonder, smuggled, most likely, out of the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre in the dead of night starting the 'Section 42 'Vexatious Litigant registration procedure to ban my right in ever getting access to a UK court under the rule of UK law?

03 08 05 HM Attorney G Vex Litigant Enq_0001.pdf

03 07 23 HM Attorney General Steps In.pdf

The Right to tape record ones own criminal or civil proceedings

Also needing informed debate are the other recent court orders, below, concerning the right for a litigant in person (LiP) to have possession, if only temporary, of supervised taped recordings of evidence to indicate, at least, some semblance of 'equality in arms' in our UK adversarial court system.

13 05 30 SWP ASL Ruling.pdf

13 04 24 Tape Order.pdf

13 04 18 barrister cont note re Tape Appl.pdf

13 06 07 RCJ 8 2.23 Morgan J Application for key players.pdf

13 06 07 RCJ Tape Wit Refused Morgan Order.docx

A little word of advice

Any one thinking of bringing civil actions against any Welsh authority by deliberately starting it in England, as I was advised by Bristol lawyers, to get a fair trial or 20 years later, then lodge an appeal in London, as I deliberately travelled to do, to avoid the stench of the Cardiff Cabal, please note the seal on the Order handed down by the very same judge that blocked all the politically sensitive incidents , last year, in my 20 years of hell.

More Extortionate Court Costs

The high court judge taxed the police £6,23&.50p by deducting it by £237.50p!

A good example of the usual 'HM gravy train' tactics, in UK courts, anything to deter those who cannot find legal representation they can trust.....rather a 'catch 22 situation, isn't it?

The QC, trailing barrister and crew were not needed to speak, of course but could only claim if they all attended.

The telephone conferences, to guaranteeing of blocking key police officers and a meeting in chambers, ex parte no doubt, could have all been done for the barrister to be back on the train even before the case was listed to start.

A few of the 'incidents' were motoring

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

13 05 05 REDACTED Statement of Insurance Agent.pdf

95 03 22 Guernsey RoadTax letter.pdf

A few other incident may also indicate 'intent'.

I am arrested outside my Cardiff surgery for stealing my own Guernsey registered BMW motor bike and jailed in Cardiff prison until identified!

Real Enid Blyton stuff !

Are YOU next?

Cardiff police contact Guernsy police over the bike, bought from a policeman, a Mr Farnham of music fame.

93 05 20 Pt ONE Jailed forTheft Unidentified _0002.pdf

93 05 20 PtTWO Jailed forTheft Unidentified .pdf

93 05 20 Pt THREE Jailed forTheft Unidentified.pdf

93 05 20 Pt FOUR Jailed forTheft Unidentified .pdf

93 05 20 Pt FIVE Jailed forTheft Unidentified.pdf

93 SWP Fairwater Tape.pdf

And a sample of others

13 05 04 Receptionis st.pdf

13 05 12 Gafael st.pdf

95 07 22 Sgt Roe St.pdf

10 year history of my litigation attempting to avoid being 'struck off' as a veterinary surgeon

02 10 22 Justice and Victims Unit .pdf

02 10 22 Part TWO Justice and Victims Unit .pdf

part three later

And it all came from, this Cardiff court heard, South Wales Police first contacting GUERNSEY police on 20th May 1993, with me in custody, in Fairwater, Cardiff, police station cells, on the pretext I could not be identified!!!!!!!!!!!

The following day Cardiff magistrates sent me to prison until I was identified....the state of our future or what?

but the commander of Barry police had long discussions with Guernsy police in December 1992 trying to stitch me up for arson , the the burning out of my WW2 D-Day Piper Cub;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc

http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx

Outside HM Supreme Court

Delivery, with Genevieve, of my appeal to HM Privy Council to intervene, following complaint by South Wales Police that had my name, for life removed from the UK veterinary register.

And now something completely different

the final two pages of Pilot Magazine article after the 2001 London to Sydney Air Race (previous pages at bottom of previous blogs)

Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (6).pdf

Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (7).pdf

Burma War Auster

Lord Leveson Mr Justices Mitting & Males REFUSE Maurice's Applic for NHS (Wales) Falsified MAPPA Psychiatric Reports to be CORRECTED OR CLARIFIED

Maurice — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:56:00 GMT

JUDGMENT

14th March 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal, whilst sitting in Cardiff, refused Maurice Kirk both legal representation and clarificationion as to whether he had 'significant brain damage’ and 'possible' cancer reported to 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, by a South Wales police psychiatrist, whilst recommending his victim be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Prison for the doctor’s own safety, from an interested third party, an elderly Norman Scarth Esq.

That makes 14 UK judges, now, protecting NHS (Wales) and South Wales Police policy and damned the danger to the general public, to allow servicer of the 'Gulag card' on anyone who dares threaten their

pensions

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2013-03-14a.147843.h&s=speaker%3A11420#g147843.q0

Maurice's very simple submission, today, stating, at the out set he only wanted his psychiatric reports corrected or clarified.

They had already had the refusal drafted months ago

Maurice asked for an ajournment for legal representation but was refused.

Maurice asked it be adjourned owing to a JR application was outstanding about the circus of District Judge John Charles circus on 1st December 2011....Maurice was refused

Their Lordships already had this document from me, knocked up at 6am on the day, served on them for Cyberr space world wide ECHR and CCRC

Please note today's court judgment is a stark warning to others in Wales of what has been going on re the practice of false psychiatric reports understood by no one, not even the writer.

This judgment means trouble

Criminal Court of Appeal ref: 201203241 D2

At Cardiff Crown Court ref: CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012

1CF 03546

Regina v Maurice John Kirk

Application to Appeal

SUMMARY

The trial was unsafe because:

The jury was denied the defence evidence

Extract taken from 4^th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court hearing at approx. 10.45am

JUDGE CURRAN: Do you intend give evidence?

MR KIRK: It depends on whether you let me get my legal papers that are down stairs.

JUDGE CURRAN: Mr Kirk, I am not going to let you get at what you call your legal papers.

(The Appellant was not allowed to be present or allowed to call any defence witnesses)

The jury was misdirected

Jury note(s) to the learned judge they received a response, in the forced absence of the Appellant, that there was ‘no evidence’ from both the custody manager and court clerk’s contemporaneous notes and CCTV footage stored from GEOamey Custody Services cameras positioned both in the Appellant’s cell and in the long custody suite corridor or from the HM court’s controlled cameras at both exit of the custody suite and building.

LEE BARKER, the custody suite manager said, both on oath and in his witness statement, that he ‘served’ the ‘restraining order’ in the cell after he had to first unlocked the cell door.

MICHAEL WILLIAMS said, both on oath and in his witness statement, that he saw served on the Appellant the ‘restraining order’ whilst the Appellant was on crutches in the corridor returning from the toilets. Potential weapons, such as crutches, are not allowed in that area.

CCTV cameras recorded the part hand written ‘restraining order’ remained in BARKER’S hand , whilst in the cell and recorded the Appellant literately being dragged out and thrown out of the suite by no less than five angry custody officers who then threw his crutches onto his head as he lay on the floor of the public corridor. The camera at the exit of the building recorded defence witnesses, called to give evidence, seeing the Appellant both in hand cuffs and in a wheel chair.

The jury was subjected to a ‘An Abuse of Process’

The psychiatrist subjected the Appellant to the NHS (Wales) zero tolerance policy thereby seriously prejudicing current civil litigation from 20 years of persistent police bullying by

a) Causing the Appellant to be registered, in Barry police station, on 8^th June 2009, a MAPPA level 3 victim, to be one of the 5% most dangerous so registered and then

b) On the 22^nd June 2009 caused the Appellant to be arrested and remanded in custody on dreamed up fire arms charges over a WWI antique Lewis machine gun and then

c) had the Appellant, on 7^th august 2009, sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, without even examining his own patient and then

d) without the appropriate qualifications and contrary to others with appropriate qualifications, recommended to a Crown Court, on 2^nd December 2009, that the Appellant be further incarcerated into Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison for the doctor’s own safety (see para39 of 19^th October 2009 psychiatric report) and then

e) The psychiatrist wrote that the Appellant had ‘significant brain damage’ with the court being told, in the forced absence of the Appellant, that he possibly had cancer’

f) The Appellant has NEVER been supplied with the evidence, clarification or retraction of such nonsense despite this Appellant’s last application before this very same Criminal Court of Appeal for that very same purpose

g) The mischief by Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams continues

Last July he signed a ‘victim’ statement that the Appellant had harassed him at his home with his wife, Dr Janis Hillier, also of Caswell Clinic, to such an extent that they are now both on ‘extended sick leave’. The lies continued in that he also stated police had to be called to the scene but with Appellant’s subsequent imprisonment ending by all charges being dropped.

4 Section 1 (3) of 1997 Harassment Act provides a DefenceThe Appellant was not allowed at the1^st December 2010 summary hearing, while facing ‘harassment’ allegations of the police doctor, at its subsequent 1^st March 2013 appeal or even at the 4^th May 2013 jury trial to put a legal argument that the police doctor had knowingly committed crime, due to police black mail and therefore the Appellant was permitted

a) that it was pursued for the purposes of preventing or detecting crime

b) that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment

c) that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable

Maurice J Kirk BVSc 14^th March 2013

SO WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4G0vYqzTc

At my age the evilness from UK courts' cartel is but small beer.

I broadcast a taste of last time I was in front of Their Lordships, in the Royal Courts of Justice, on another futile appeal, having served yet another prison sentance caused by Dr Tegwyn Williams, re a Cardiff judge daring to suggest, ney insult my intellegence, that he would order and obtain, bloody liar, for the NHS (Wales) to produce the evidence I was to be sent to Ashworth ipp as a public hazard.

Who filmed this, quite without my knowing and definitely without my approval , I do not know but had I known I would not of been so subservient......and the rest.

Dr Tewgwyn Wlliams black mailed by police to recommend to His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC that I be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison 'for his own safety'!..... see paragraph 39

4th Williams Psych Reprt 19 10 9.pdf

9 12 1 medical Kemp.pdf

Dr Tegwyn Williams' wrong doing?

The Appellant believes Dr Tegwyn Williams is an unaccountable Clinical Director who can call on NHS lawyers and NHS chiefs to cover up his wrongdoing. It is in papers, that were not before the Courts in this case, that Dr Tegwyn Williams is that unaccountable that he calls on the support of the Chief of local NHS and Welsh NHS to use police to stop complaints about him going to the General Medical Council

Dr TW to help his associates (some local police) in a civil dispute, Sectioned the Appellant, without first assessing him, when the Appellant was not a patient of those kinds of services.

Dr TW then entirely made up that the Appellant had significant irreversible brain damage and made application to indefinitely Section the appellant to High Security Hospital. He failed in his attempted to indefinitely Section as no other medical doctor would support him.

The point is that Dr Tegwyn Williams is not medically qualified to interpret brain scans, as that is the job of the neuro-radiologist who has training and qualifications so to do. Dr Tegwyn Williams does not use or invite anyone who was medically qualified.

The Clinic team wrote in the team assessment from the three monthly Sections at the Caswell Clinic, that they wanted to build a relationship with the Appellant as an outpatient and draw him in.

But each time the Appellant would attend Caswell clinic Dr Tegwyn Williams would arrange that Police were called to arrest him.

In the end, to prevent the General Medical Council acting on what Dr Tegwyn Williams does wrong, he brought zero tolerance prosecutions by claiming, in short, that lawful accurate comments that were not defamatory, made him feel harassed.

Changes in law and interpretations.

Does it matter that what the Appellant says is accurate and not defamatory and now changes in the law (reform of public order Section 5) also means that an insult is no longer meant to be harassment ?

Also Courts have decided to recognise playful or eccentric comments as not malicious and with the example of a jovial threat to blow up the airport as meaning to be light hearted.

That light hearted meaning is very relevant to the Appellant as his ‘Wanted posters’, were clearly meant to be light hearted comment from a man well now as a harmless eccentric.

Where is the proportionality in wanting to imprison a 67 year old man for making accurate, reasonable, eccentric, light hearted but entirely justified and necessary comment ?

Stafford NHS scandal, the Need for Freedom of Expression and Appellant’s course of conduct and alleged Breach, can stop suffering and worse.

Mr Jeremy Hunt, the Coalition Health Minister encourages the need for people to be able to speak out when things go wrong in the NHS and that no gagging Orders should exist on NHS conduct. Especially as around 1200 people needlessly died at Stafford as there was no where to complain and little way to speak out

There are said to be at least fifteen other hospital Trust like Stafford.

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and “incompatibility”

The Appellant would be raises whether the Criminal Court of Appeal would grant permission for an application to ague “incompatibility” on how the Act is not compatible with Human and Fundamental Rights and that Parliament could not have known the effect that it’s legislation would have.

As we are aware it is for the Higher Courts to declare incompatibility and for Parliament to remove that incompatibility, if it so wishes.

It is said that the ‘course of conduct’ in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is unique to the UK. No other country has it. Other countries make do with stalking laws and other like measures. One reason why all other countries do not use ‘a course of conduct’ as a criminal offence is that it is said that this kind of law is open to too many problems and abuse.

One of the four cornerstones of EU law is that a person must be able to tell that their conduct would be a criminal offence. The UK law interprets that as would know with advice of a lawyer.

Yet full time Judges decide on if a course of conduct amount to harassment in ways that the best lawyers in the UK cannot predict how Judges will interpret what amounts to harassment in for example the zero tolerance, white collar, neighbour or family disputes. The appellant believes that means that the Protection from Harassment Act is clearly not compatible with EU law, and that is but one example.

With the Malicious Communications Act 2003, a new stalking law and various other measures and that the Harassment Act is know to be so widely over used and miss used, many call for the 1997 Act to fade away, in favour of expanding the scope of other laws

Maurice John Kirk BVSc

12 March 2013

My 64 page statement completed as police helicopter hovered over head as armed police surrounded the matrimonial home (see blog below of home and aerodrome up for auction due to a broken marriage) with frightend wife citing this incident, in divorce papers, due to Operation Orchid, to snatch our then 10 year old daughter at the same time as my hand cuffs clicked on.

Who will be next to suffer under power crazy South Wales Police Hierarchy?

09 06 19 64 pages of Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirkl.pdf

Maurice Kirk v Dr T W Williams.docx

11 03 10 Dr T W position statement (1).pdf

GMC.pdf

Glamorgan Gem 30th Sept 10.pdf

10 09 06 SWP_Claimant_interim_Skeleton.pdf

TO stop this trial from starting Dolmans, solicitors advised Barbara Wilding and MAPPA meetings in Caswell Clinic, would you believe, on how to instigate her Metropolitan Police intorduced tactic of a 'shoot to kill' policy but first she had had to get me registered MAPPA level 3, using Dr Williams, in order for it to be a 'lawful kill'

the 22nd June 09 police raid , using well over twenty, some armed, police officers, and helicopter, under Operation Chalice' to surround our home was co-ordinjated with anotter pack of police officers , under Operation Orchid' in order to snatch our daughter.....telling my wife I was so dangerous a threat to her and the general public our Genevieve was to be 'taken into care'. Kirstie had other ideas.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/aircaraft_and_airshows/South-Wales-Airfield-FOR-SALE.aspx

10 12 7 MJK MAPPA Executive Summary.pdf

To stop this on going trial , currently in Cardiff County Court, for police now proven police criminal conduct and harassment damages, from ever reaching cross examination stage, first it was 'my possession of a machine gun 'fiasco and then the State playing this fabricated medical 'findings', their 'Gulag Card', as seventeen years of police harassment, so far and HM assisted 'treacle treatment; whough Cardiff's iniquitous law courts had failed to block the true state of both our law courts , prisons and police forces, right across The Principality.

09 09 03 MG Trans Redacted.pdf

Their Lordships, together with the documentary evidence that Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams knowingly falsified, in the presence of South Wales Police officers, his Sect 9 countersigned witness statements, to obtain my false imprisonment, are to consider the 'ramifications' of the enclosed transcript from part of 4th May 12 'Breach of Restraining Order' conviction hearing, now the subject of their deliberations.

The transcript clearly indicates, just as in the 2010 'machine gun' scandalous jury tria, l was refused even my legal papers and personal court exhibits even in thew court room!

On 4th May2012 His Honour Judge Curran QC, whilst I was forced to be absent due to requiring urgent medical attention, had refused me Dr Williams or any others, named, to be either my 'character witness' or as a 'witness of fact'.

On 1st December 2011 District Judge John Charles had done exactly the same, in my absence, when he convict me for 'harassment' of Dr Williams following the publishing of further falsifed documents by Dr Tegwyn Williams, namely, my series of NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic psychiatric reports culminating, on 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court, that I be further sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, due to 'significant brain damage' and 'possible cancer', in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison.

Closer scutiny of my Casswel Clinic, Bridgend, medical records, discloses, as in his October 2009 psychiatric report, his other and most pressing reason as to why I had to be moved to Broadmoor or Ashworth was because of 'veiled' threats , he told me, of 'reprisals' by an old gentleman by the name of Norman Scarth!

T20120090 - Kirk - proc from 10.40 - 12.26 - 04.05.12.pdf

Experts in the field confirm there was no sign of relevant brain damage BEFORE Williams even writes the report without appropriate qualifications.

On 7th August 09, when he wrote his first released psychiatric report, [previous others only for MAPPA South Wales Police meetings], as His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC stated, when refusing, recently, to 'strike out' my one million pound damages claim against NHS (Wales), without evening examining his patient!

09 09 01radiologist scans report.pd

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 12 17 Court Hearing to Extend IPP.pdf

http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/03/20/the-supreme-court-on-harassment-purpose-and-rationality/#more-17700

You may like to Google 'The Real Maurice Kirk' and come to the County Court tomorrow and Crown court on Thursday

ps My birthday is on Tuesday

Quiz Time:

What does a Duchess, a dairy maid and a cow have in common

clue:

It was most unlikely my father fought on the D-Day Beaches

Answer:

Work it out for yourself

my e-mail is maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Subject:

Signing up to 'I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK' at PledgeBank.com

Please click on the link below to confirm your signature on the
pledge at the bottom of this email.

http://www.pledgebank.com/L/BVyQLvFuTJTaBt79hA

The pledge was created by Patrick Cullinane and reads:

'I will I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the
Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st
October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of
JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK but only if 150 other
people from the UK will do the same. We the People in the UK
have been denied our GUARANTEED RIGHTS to due-process via the
Common Law Trial by Jury, which is the Law of the Land.'

Yours,
the PledgeBank.com team

ends

Keith Vaz MP & Welsh Judiciary Fudge NHS Control over their own Doctors to Block GMC Investigation

Maurice — Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:14:00 GMT

MY BRIEF EXPLANATION FOR WELSH AUTHORITIES NHS & MAPPA EXTREME CONDUCT

Associated videos to this epic 'Flight to Australia', 'without a map', suffering 'significant brain damage' and suspect brain tumour, led to the unlawful sectioning, under the 1983 Mental Health Act, of the pilot, 'trading in machine guns', by several NHS (Wales) employees, all guarrenteed imunity to prosecution by MAPPA and eleven Cardiff Crown Court judges, sum up the plans by the Welsh Authorities for YOU or any anyone else who dares challenge the 'New World Order'.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2yLlBunsrc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JVFh-AoHiU

12 12 31 CPS Dicken re RCJ Appeal.pdf

12 12 31 IPCC Vaz.pdf

This early 'draft'was handed to my Mackenzie Friend in the 3rd May12 jury trial from wicked CPS barrister David Garath Evans who continues to produce the written over 'draft' by the eaqually wicked Judge John Charles in front of a host of my helpers in the public gallery

11 12 01 RO CPS Draft REDACTED.pdf

12 12 21 CPS Dicken RO.pdf

12 10 21 Restraining Order WitnessStatement REDACTED.doc

12 07 13 CARDIFF POLICE STATEMENT.doc,

The point is that neither the police Caswell Clinic psychiatrist nor psychologist Professor Wood are medically qualified to interpret a CT brain scan as that is the role of the neuro-radiologist who has training and qualifications so to do.

All the neuro radiologists that examined the scans contradict the psychiatrist’s findings but still he went ahead and applied that I be sectioned IPP to Ashworth, ‘imprisonment for public protection’ with the full support of MAPPA

On 2^nd December 2009 in Cardiff Crown Court the prosecution, police psychiatrist and court of were all in receipt of my privately funded specialist report faxed the day before. Only achievedm incidentally, by the quick thinking Walter Sweeney, ex MP for the Vale of Glamorgan and his lovely wife, Nuala, a leading consultant radioligist in South East Yorkshire.

No one would allow it to be referred to as seen on the transcript overlooked to be destroyed at the time.

9 12 1 medical Kemp.pdf

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/_A300_100_2C00_000-Machine-Gun-Reward.aspx quickly repainted by police but failed to fool the jury

Machine Gun Indictment.pdf Carrying a Mandatory 10 year prison sentance and by now the South Wales Police had painted the machine gun a different colour to try and fool the jury

Likewise, someone stupidly forgot to 'corrupt' the tape before transcription....a common game for distorting the truth to fool the public

09 12 17 Court Hearing to Extend IPP.pdf

However, there is the built in provision in the Act that you cannot be prosecuted 'for a course of conduct' when attempting 'to prevent or detect (further ) crime'.....the very purpose of distributed WANTED posters. A further procaution was taken to get no less than severn police officers to examine the posters for adverse comment whilst they were being distributed. Of course I was refused any of them as witnesses

The CPS, on 1st December, produced various drafts of a 'Restraining Order' producing the following but still not disclosing the one now needed, of course, for the Criminal Court of Appeal, very shortly, the part hand written draft brought waved under my nose, in my cell, by that GEOamey guard, the lying little Lee Barker who's statement completely contradicted that of the only other tamed witness in a corridoe of six eager on lookers!

THE 1997 HARASSMENT ACT is a typically knee jerk written piece of legislation, of the Blair era, now being abused just to lock up those exposing the crimes going on daily in our welsh law courts.

Anticipating the continuing conduct of the Welsh courts, to protect their very own NHS's conduct in a similar manner to the way they had so far protected their police force, irrespective of the facts, I quietly lobbed into their cess pit of deceipt, rather like a Mills bomb into the mill pool for trout, a petty debt £840 claim for bus fares and time wasted, travelling backwards and forwards countless times to Caswell Clinic, when originally promised my medical records used on 2nd December 09 to have me sent to Ashworth. That claim, as predicted, to prevent the doctor having the risk of committing perjury, was settled out of court to the cost to the tax payer well in excess of £20,000.

There then followed the substantive claims before the final one due on 30th January 2013 at the hearingr to consolidate with the eight or so police claims:

10 06 07 One Million Pound Claim against NHS (Wales)_only R.pdf

12 12 04 SWP High Court Consolidation Application - REDACTED.doc

WHY IS THIS MAN 'ON THE SICK' BUT REPRESENTED BY MORGAN COLE WHO ACT FOR NHS (WALES)?

it stinks, doesn't it?

http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/ipcc-receives-631-corruption-allegation-complaints-about-welsh-police-forces/

LATEST NHS & POLICE RESPONSE (Crime Reference number 62126415504 reported 16.45 hrs 28th Dec 2012)

12 12 13 NHS Rebuttal Restraining Order Variation_0001.pdf

12 12 30 MJK NHS reponse to 13th letter.doc

At my 20^th December 2012 magistrate’s application, to be able to see my South Wales doctor, this 13^th December Morgan Cole document was, without me knowing, already with both District Judge Bodfan Jenkins and CPS Mr Dicken, the latter summoned to represent Her Majesty.

All four parties, the NHS, the protected rogue doctor, scheming judge and bewildered CPS ALL blocked the progress of the case by pre arranging yet another adjournment, a game they have played now for over a year…...anything to cover up the truth.

Like wise, Bodfan Jenkins, an old hand at perverting the course of justice, held back the clerk of the court’s notes of the May 12 ‘shooting walking stick’ hearing following my repeated attempts to have my totally legal property returned by the police following their 2009 ‘machine gun’ house raid fiasco.

The case was adjourned, far too embarrassing for a public arena. My medical care will have wait until their conclusion at 22^nd January hearing!!!…….. come, witness and inhale their stench

The ‘walking stick shot gun case lingers on a ‘case stated’ application forcing the same judge to release the court’s notes indicating it had statements from both police and my then wife , none of which I knew about during the 2010 ‘machine gun’ jury trial, indicating a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice

So what? The South Wales Police are past masters at distorting the truth.

Letter to GMC:

I emphasize that in writing my psychiatric reports Dr ******** was unduly influenced by the South Wales Police to report that I was suffering mental health problems resulting from ‘significant’ brain damage and that in coming to such a conclusion Dr ******** deliberately ignored reports from properly qualified radiologists stating that my brain scan was normal for a man of my age.

Instead the doctor sought out the advice of a clinical psychologist researcher who was not qualified to interpret such scans (and who was not made aware of the radiologists reports) and then moved beyond even this advice to tell numerous courts on the basis of no evidence whatsoever that I had suspected brain cancer.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

enclosed

09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans.pdf

None of these named three Caswell Clinic and Princess of Wales doctors were allowed in any of my Harassment or Restraining Order hearing

Caswell Clinic Medical Records Leak REDACTED rcds

Caswell Clinic Medical Records Leak REDACTED.pdf

BRISTOL RADIO INTERVIEW

http://bcfm.org.uk/category/shows/dialect-radio

[DOWNLOAD & skip first 4min 30 sec of this 14th Dec 12 Broadcast]

NEXT Bristol Broadcast shortly.......if not 'pulled'

None of these named three Caswell Clinic and Princess of Wales doctors were allowed in any of my Harassment or Restraining Order hearings

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

10 10 17 GMC Wales complaint REDACTED.doc

12 09 19 GMC Briefing REDACTED.pdf

09 09 03 MG Trans Redacted.pdf

11 01 05 GMC close to Mr Kirk.doc

http://www.gmc-uk.org/concerns/making_a_complaint/3841.asp

03 07 23 HM Attorney General Steps In.pdf

As the Cardiff Cabal dictate the instructions to your own lawyer's and whose turn it is to win, in the stench of their courts, this further futile jesture may amuse or annoy the occasional reader?

Hearing date 30th January 2013

12 12 04 SWP High Court Consolidation Application REDACTED.doc

The three month trial, for first three of eight or nine Actions against the South Wales Police, starts on 18th February all based on police being allowed to refuse to disclose their records and identity of all witnesses at each of the forty odd incidents of police bullying.

I started this retaliation 20 years ago in Bristolbut then transferred to Wales where the first thing the little bast**ds did was to refuse me a jury.

Each time the trial was listed, ever since, the same bunch of evil Welsh had me locked me up, for months at a time, on a string of fabricated charges dependant, of course, on a string of very corrupt judges in both Cardiff Crown and magistrates courts and wicked forensic psychiatrist

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

and a wee missive from down under.......

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

PANACEA is "an answer or solution for all problems or difficulties ... via Latin from Greek panakeia healing everything, from pan all + akēs remedy".and that's certainly the case for all our problems and injustices here in Australia (& Old South Wales) where we are regarded as Slaves by the Thieves and Traitors, ie: the Banks and Judges, who rule our country because of our ignorance of MAGNA CARTA and gutlessness to fight the evil-doers.When MAGNA CARTA says: "No free man shall be taken indeed imprisoned, or exiled or outlawed, or dispossessed or destroyed in any way, nor shall we pass over him nor send over him unless by the lawful judgment of his equals which is the law of the land", and the Thieves and Traitors continue to steal and kill and destroy unimpeded, then Hosea 4: 6 is 100% correct by saying "People are destroyed for the lack of knowledge".Thomas Jefferson said, "If the people do not know how to govern themselves, then educate them"..... which brings me to the attachment annexed hereto and called "COURTS ARE GOVERNMENT".Robert Balgarnie of Inverell, told me years ago, "We're living in a 5-star prison" and "Nothing is going to change because we're no hurting enough, yet".Educating the People of Australia is a difficult task .. especially against all the lies and propaganda the Thieves and Traitors churn out.It's going to take M-O-N-E-Y........ BIG M-O-N-E-Y.Does anyone know of a PHILANTHROPIC PATRIOT ....... anyone?????If there is such a MAN or WOMAN, perhaps they might like to read the "AIMS and OBJECTIVES" of the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY at http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/pdf/ACLP%20Constitution001.pdf saying: “3.1 To ensure that the Commonwealth of Australia remains a Common Law Jurisdiction with Sovereignty belonging to the Australian People who will always be able to exercise their inalienable Right to Trial by Jury in Australian Courts for the administration of Justice, the advancement of Truth, the effective implementation of Democracy and the preservation of Liberty. 3.2 To seek the teaching of the fundamental principles of Common Law throughout the schools and universities of Australia that Common Law is indeed the Law of the People, by the People and for the People. 3.3 To ensure that Grand Juries operate for the investigation of serious offences and of the maladministration of government and the finding of true Bills of Indictment to go to Petit Juries who will judge the facts and the laws presented to them in those particular actions and that Grand and Petit Juries be unimpeded in their inquisitorial role and the full execution of their authority to question and call for witnesses and to determine the admissibility of evidence.3.4 To endorse and support candidates for election to all levels of government in Australia in order to achieve the above Aims and Objectives.”Politicians are either ego-trippers or stooges for the "vested interest groups" (to put it politely).... and our Parliaments are definitely not acting in our best interests, in the spirit of "For we are young and free".Therefore, there is an URGENT and DESPERATE NEED to put these characters in their place. Unless we can firmly establish DEMOCRACY OVER BUREAUCRACY, ie: the PEOPLE having SOVEREIGNTY, then we really are NOTHING but SLAVES and we commit our CHILDREN to that ever-worsening state. Yours sincerely,John Wilson.Chairman, Australian Common Law Party. PS: SUPPORT & FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS: Firstly, there’s no better way to pitch in than to join the Party. There are no Membership Fees. See: http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/html/aclp.html Secondly, spread the word that the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY is now upon the scene. The word is: solutions to all our problems lie within ourselves. Thirdly, send donations to the BENDIGO BANK, 198 Macquarie Street, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia, where our account is: Account name: AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY. BSB: 633-000 and Account number: 143521896. For overseas deposits SWIFT No./Code: BENDAU 3B.

http://victims-unite.net/our-cases-as-stories/violent-physical-attacks/maurice-kirk/

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/lnmrn/2012/12/28/the-horokane-hour-hosted-by-dr-len-

Michael Docherty's US interview on 'Harassment Act' remakably 'deja vu'!!!!!

Cardiff County Court Hearing re Doctor 30^th January 2013

There is an outstanding civil damages claim surrounding police operation, ‘Operation Chalice’ and a ‘machine gun’ I once owned attached to my aircraft. The armed police raid, backed by helicopter, on the marital home on 22^nd June 2009, marked the date of our marital separation. Witnesses present are reluctant to disclose any information always needed. That includes witness identification, copy of all statements taken and substance of all conversations and how and when the house search was carried out etc My daughter was again at risk, under police code name ‘Operation Orchid’, to ‘snatch her by Social Services. It is MAPPA and a rogue forensic psychiatrist that caused, if you wish to believe a word of it, added reasons given and accepted in court, as to why I was not to be released for nearly eight months and in return sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act.

Cardiff Magistrates Court Proceedings Buried

The case relates to a purported ‘shooting walking stick shot gun’ obtained by the police, nearly a year later, from the marital home, during my January 2010 ‘machine gun’ trial at Cardiff but with no witness statements taken. None of this information came to my notice until three years later and only by my court applications to make the police disclose relevant evidence.

Application to Vary Restraining Order continues 22nd January 2013.....as farcical as the previous nonsense

MEAN WHILE THIS IS IGNORED

IPCC Refs 2099/0116588 & 2012/001471

Cardiff Wales

CF3 5EA

5th November 2012

Dear Sir,

Re More South Wales Police Bullying

Further to my ongoing complaint please note the latest complaints, enclosed, of at least several more examples of criminal conduct being occasioned:

South Wales Police cross to England to influence a witness that has caused my name being removed from the veterinary register and receive a criminal conviction.

Enclosed website blog with one 27th Oct 12 statement agreed and signed by Christopher Paul ALEXANDER originally MR EBBS and witnessed by several people.

. 2nd Nov 2010 conviction of common assault fabricated to use to oppose bail over a two year period only for it to be then withdrawn police never ever having intended to fight my appeal as the two year use of successfully opposing my bail had served its purpose..

Enclosed as a summary from my current website blog simply to indicate the extreme length Cardiff judges are now actively supporting their own police force’s criminal conduct

False imprisonment re 2^nd allegation of Breach of a Restraining Order from approx 21st Sept 2012 imprisonment for nearly 3 months on evidence later withdrawn as the police knew full well my action to fax a pre action protocol draft witness summons to Caswell Clinic was lawful.

My request for the MAPPA fabricated withheld medical evidence, used by police, CPS and rogue doctor, to apply for my transfer to Ashworth Psychiatric prison on 2nd Dec 2009, requires immediate disclosure in order I may apply to be put back on the veterinary register and for me to be eligible to update my professional flying licences.

Please do not allow this new evidence slow down you outstanding investigations of 'shoot to kill policy, 'machine gun' malicious prosecution and the falsification and maladministration of my being registered a MAPPA level 3 victim. Just when will you instruct an outside police force?

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

"Is this a dagger which I see before me?" "Why Didn't the Judge Stop the Trial?" the Police Sergeant asked

Maurice — Sat, 28 Jul 2012 01:41:00 GMT

12 07 26 Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal Court of Appeal ref.pdf

Is this a dagger which I see before me? 11 12 01 RO CPS Draft.pdf

Handed to us in the dock of Cardiff Crown Court by this CPS barrister admitting there was yet another, the one over scribbled by District Judge John Charles in the full view of the court

12 07 26 The Manager of the Administrative Court CO.pdf

I now have documentary proof on how Cardiff High Court Judges were consulted before the Cardiff magistrates altered the ground rules, in 2010 to stop my cross examining any more prosecuting police officers after my eight successful Crown Court appeals from 20 years of South Wales Police bullying to have me struck off as a veterinary surgeon.

This Friday, CPS (Wales) finally deny having any record of any 'draft' restraining orders that led to my nine months prison sentence, subject to appeal in the Criminal Court of Appeal in the Royal Courts of Justice shortly.

This week's revelations over Cardiff Civil Justice Centre's withholding the Royal Courts of Justice CO/6357/2012 file to pervert the Mr Justice Beatson hearing is just 'small bear' to the disclosed court logs now indicating High Court intervention without the defendant or as an appellant, being notified and thereby being denied a right of appeal.

Deja Vu? Just like 2nd December Cardiff 2009 hearing, before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, when South Wales Police rogue psychiatrist and rogue CPS barrister, Richard Tohme, in the machine gun case, disgust in my absence, with court tape recorder deliberately switched off, the ways they may get me sectioned, IPP, to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric prison. My luck lasted that day.

My application to the RCJ led, also this week, to a witness statement available to confirm its authenticity.

The concerned police sergeant, on hearing my McKenzie Friend at May 12 jury trial, recount what he saw, reluctantly took a statement. Senior police officers immediately stopped all other statements being taken, including my seven page draft, to be copied onto MG 11 official police/CPS documents for investigation.

"Why Didn't the Judge Stop the Trial?" the Police Sergeant asked my McKenzie Friend after the statement was taken down.

12 06 19 Statement of Meirion Bowen.pdf

But my visiting solicitor to the prison has recorded my account of the GEOamy custody manager entering my cell and asking me to comment on the part hand written document by District Judge Charles long before he convicts in my absence.

So how does the CPS 'square the circle' on having 'no record' when all was recorded on CCTV under magistrates control?

Does it stink any more than we already know?

So I have been appealing to the Cardiff High Court, all these years at vast expense and time wasted, on arbitrary refusals by both Cardiff Crown and Cardiff magistrate's judges refusing to expand on their, on the face of them, both obtuse and asinine, no where to be found in the law books.

Next thing is to see if this lot is sorted out in the public as who will be next?

12 02 16 MJK Complaint to HHJ Hughes.pdf

Oh what a disgusting environment I am currently in.

Musa Trial Today but is Your Daughter now Safe Anywhere in UK?

Maurice — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:39:00 GMT

Go Petition summary by Sabine

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/the-secrecy-of-the-family-courts-should-be-lifted-now.html

So what made me focus on the Family Court system here in South Wales? Read on.........

South Wales Police launched 30+ men, many armed and with a helicopter, all at your expense just to snatch one ten year old child from our front garden on that sunny afternoon Sunday three years ago.

9 6 SWP Dolmans app re Wit exchange.pdf

9 6 22 SWP Machine gun Dolmans arrest.pdf

09 06 19 SWP Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirk final.pdf

BUT after three years of police CPS and Dolmans ignoring Cardiff Court Orders I finally get my 'hot and sweaty' on still more proof of the machine gun / false psychiatric reports conspiracy IPCC continue to ignore and this only came in last week because I repeated the application in Bristol Crown Court, in ENGLAND..... 09 06 20 SWP Dolmans MG 11.pdf, that their own solictors, Dolmans of Cardiff, gave advice relating to the FTAC/MAPPA conspiracy over an old WW1 Lewis Machine Gun, excellent for rabbiting, bolted on my aircaft in order to try and get me shot!

And who still dares say 'HM Partnership' is still not thriving in these evil Cardiff buildings?

Will your family be next?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y&noredirect=1

Three times in HM Cardiff Prison and three times, in row, assaulted by Prison Officer Myers, bigger than me, last time punching me in the face and stomach to then knocking me to the ground onto my had hip whilst returning to court in order to deny me my legal papers overnight.

12 06 25 SWP Prison assault reply_0001.pdf 12 04 16 HMP reply to MP.pdf & this grossly inaccurate HM letter 12 04 16 HMP reply to MP.pdf & refused bail application until a JR is file in court....outragios behavior 12 06 12 JR re refused bail applications.pdf & Harassment State a Case JR .....shortly

THIS E-MAIL just came my way but I do NOT vouch for all its content as, obviously, some of it was without my witnessing it as to what really happened.

However, much of it I KNOW IS TRUE and therefore allowed on this and my other sites of mine should the judges close it down , as they have done in the past..... Hi - we saw Chiwar yesterday and he said the following:

he was incensed that no statements, from those who had made them, went to the jury as the prosecution refused this and the judge backed it.

He also said Owusu's summing up statement was cut short by the judge - he had an 80 page statement and was given till 1 oclock to deliver it but was cut off at 12 oclock, thus not even finishing his summing up. Nobody ive spoken to has a good word to say about the defence team and i agree certain things shouldve been done properly wrongly.

Eg. - the witnesses. i know the 2 defence witnesses who spoke - Steve and Vicki. Steve is a pastor and came to 1 hearing as a supporter at Gee St. court last June which was a closed hearing and i saw him twice at the Musas W Green Rd home when i was there. He would pray with the Musas and they would get into it and begin dancing as he would speak in tongues for 10 mins whilst praying with the Musas which ive never seen before from a supposed Christian pastor. I asked him later was this healthy and a correct thing to do given the circumstances and he said whatever he was saying was good and was confusing the devil who had no idea what he was saying. I pointed out that nobody else did either - not even him and he said it was of no consequence as whatever he was saying was good and was Gods message and will that it be said.

Anyway Steve wouldve witnessed Chiwar + Gloria acting responsibly at all times with their children which i guess was the point of him being called at all.

Musa was incensed that the witnesses for the defence who did not give evidence or were not asked for statements to be shown were:
Maurice Kirk
Kay Young
Paul Randle=Jolliffe
Cecilia Gibson
Moji Word
any of the intimidated witnesses who were affected by H'gey because of having dealings with H'gey / Adesida, often having children removed/threatened to have that. Those i met and spoke with were:

Christine Danko, Janice, another Vicki, and 2 others i forget the names of. Gloria introduced me to these people last May and they all told outrageous tales.
Frank Gad
Janet Owugah
Peter Lee, from H'gey child services
Dr. Adesida
Rosita Moise H'gey solicitor
Joyce Agekyum sw H'gey
Annie Walker head sw H.gey
Sharon Fair
Alison Brooks

Karen who lived downstairs, to answer questioning about ****** being locked in the garden as it is alleged.

- thats 21 people off the tops of Chiwars and mine and Helens heads who couldve given something specific eg. Kays interraction with H'gey sw's who she threatened so much with her knowledge of the law etc. that they hounded her for months after, and H'gey + connected employees who needed questioning about their roles in it all, especially Agekyum and the rest of the H'gey lot mentioned. Chiwar said Moise the H'gey lawyer was responsible for writing the statements so as they would be legally sound especially in court and this needed to be brought out.

Musa mentioned about ketamine being put in a syringe. on the 28 june at st thomas's hospital. He knew it was that because he checked the discarded bottle after watching its contents - ketamine - being put in a syringe. I know a syringe with a liquid in was mentioned the other day. He asks was this given to the baby, and why was it set up in the 1st place and by whom, and hospital staff need to be asked about this.

An important point Chiwar mentioned was that even to date the contents of that 2000 page report that was handed to the defence team one morning early on in the trial still has not been properly discussed with the Musas - who still arent aware of some of its contents. Chiwar says a lot of the time Owusu doesnt see them before the days proceedings to discuss things, as theyre either late on getting to court or Owusu + co simply dont go to see them before the day starts. One dreads what else hasnt been discussed with the Musas thats been received by the defence team at the last minute. He thinks SERCO deliberatly bring them late for this reason + other reasons.

Chiwar says the their DNA test results was not shown to the jury and shouldve been but was refused by the CPS + judge + should be sent in at once also for the jury to see, and the 85 page statement Gloria made for the family court last November should be given to the jury.

Apparently at the prison Chiwar was told by other prisoners that a prisoner who goes by the name of "Floky" was putting it about that the Musas were involved in trafficking 15 children, plus their own. Chiwar assumes this guy is connected to H'gey in some form and trying to get Chiwar beaten. The warders apparently moved Chiwar for a short while for his own safety but now it is ok he says. If you recall the warders at Holloway were allegedly responsible Gloria says for putting it about that she was insane and dangerous and everyone should avouid her and not befriend her. Of course very soon people could see the opposite, and also when other inmates would be murdered by prison staff as happened to the prisoner - long story.

At the hospital on the 28 June Musa says no way was he gone longer than 30 mins when he left - if even that - and no way was he gone 3 hours till midday as they claim.

He says cctv footage stills from his flat in W Green rd werent shown which showed the place very habitable - the opposite to what the cps claim., and he says other photos werent shown to the jury either.

Chiwars says the judge was asked if he wanted to recuse himself but he refused and also refused getting a new jury for various reasons when asked by Owusu.

In reply to my earlier message Hi - the musa case - the prosecution has refused many witnesses giving evidence for musa and the judge is backing the prosecution so we are giving these 5/6 banned witnesses statements to the higher judge at the court on monday in writing and emailing them also to make sure the court and hopefully jury get them also Already owusu has asked the judge to recuse himself over things but he has refused also a new jury. If u can pls send ur witness statement so it can be given 1st thing monday a.m. to the chief judge lyons at the court along with other stuff then. Pls if u can send by email to me asap it can be printed off for monday - tks - {which i sent to those i had addresses of at the time}

*****replied:

I've already given my statement to the court and I believe it went to the jury but wasn't read out. It is now too late for any more statements as all the barristers have finished their cases and now it's just for the judge to sum up and send the jury out on Monday. So if they are convicted these new statements can go towards the appeal, especially if they add anything to the medical issues or are from people who knew the older 5 children. Pity these witnesses suddenly appearing after the trial is over! But actually, I think it will come out OK as Owusu did a magnificent job on Friday and it will be very hard for the jury to find the Musas guilty after what he said to them. Fingers crossed! B

I disagree its too late - the point of getting the statements from the people where possible and sending them to the court after speaking with Chiwar was so the jury could see them and it isnt too late as the trial isnt finished yet. Waiting to give the statements at an "appeal" i disagree with as these statements could add good factors to Musas case before the jury retire and waiting maybe a year - a year for the Musas in prison too - for an appeal is unacceptable in my opinion. I think they would drag an appeal date out so as the other children could be gone via adoption before an appeal hearing which would just add difficulties in sorting this entire child removal side of the case out.

Owusu may have done a "magnificent job" as is suggested but maybe being allowed to finish what he set out to do re: his summing up he mightve made an even better one, as well as doing other important things too, like discussing new bundles with the Musas amongst other things. After all, thats his job.

To my great sadness and frustration however im thinking now it is practically possible to get statements from those Chiwar wanted statements from to show to the jury by the time they could be delivered to judge Lyons on Monday morning as they simply will not be got and sent to Lyons in time, him being the head judge at Wood Green crown court. Obviously if they were given to Patrick they would be refused and i dont think theres any reason on earth why Lyons cant be given the statements except for the time limit - there is only a few hours to get them there physically in print on Monday morning. They could be sent by email of course but they need perhaps to be physically given to the court office so as Lyons can receive them and take action, so it fills me with sadness the negative option of perhaps showing these what might be important statements only at any "appeal hearing" in the distant future might be the only action taken for Chiwars request.

Anyhow if anybody can send their statement to me asap i will endeavour to email it to the court and send it 24 hour delivery on Monday morning so as the court + Lyons receives it on Tues hopefully which maybe wont be too late, or if anyone can think of a better alternative please let us know.

At the end of the day i think not having witnesses for the Musas, as good as Steve and Vicki are, is simply not good enough. The defence team are supposed to be doing the job of defending the Musas and surely witnesses are an important factor in their case.

Heather pointed out an expert toxicoligist shouldve been got as a witness by the defence, if possible. Only prosecution medical staff have been heard at all which is totally one-sided.

Also the person who was at the hospital on the 28 June - the person referred to as Gloria's "sister" when Gloria was asked who she was then by hospital or H'gey staff - shouldve given evidence as to what she heard and saw then - Chiwar maintains Gloria, for example, was not "laughing" at various times as was claimed and was was taking things with the seriousness they deserved throughout which this witness couldve confirmed.

Ian Josephs points out things that shouldve been done too that werent - like asking the children in a certain way if they were coerced into saying things, and asking in a certain way about the alleged abuse on ****** = to ****** herself and Denise Bassett - in the event the abuse wasnt mentioned at all in the trial.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y&noredirect=1

http://newafricanpress.com/2011/10/16/maurice-kirks-account-of-the-musas-family-saga/

http://www.facebook.com/maurice.kirk.16

http://therealipcc.wordpress.com/maurice-kirk/

How to complain about your GP South Wales lot refusinging me a NHS (Wales) brain scan to eventually gaol the b*****d

http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#search/no-reply%40wordpress.com/1317580a216caf24

Meanwhile all this takes its toll

12 06 18 Section 8 JR Application 18th June 2012.pdf

http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#search/no-reply%40wordpress.com/1317580a216caf24

And if the enemy wish to continue to cheat let us bring in the Big Guns

http://victims-unite.net/2012/06/28/international-three-day-fast-and-praying-for-the-musas-starting-today/

'HM Partnership' in Challenge

Maurice — Sat, 05 Jun 2010 20:41:52 GMT

I have spent a life trying to sort out problems, for me and many others, but visiting the so called 'Supreme Court of England and Wales', this week, confirmed my worst fears and caused me to realise much precious time has been wasted.

Please do not repeat my foot steps,

Maurice 2

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Damages Claim

Maurice — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:01:57 GMT

It is with great regret, after a life of immense enjoyment and satisfaction, watching, listening and learning from father, working as a veterinary surgeon and then, myself, revelling in his 'jack of all trades' vocation, as your typical West Country vet, I have to now prosecute, against all the odds of a Royal Charter, a bunch of villains in a final attempt to, once again, practice veterinary surgery.

In my life there would often have been urgent descisions to be made for animal welfare. Whether it was the cat's broken leg, from a car accident or the dog's itchy skin, the old cow's womb out or the child's pony with colic, whatever it was, it was it was always exciting and above all, mentally stimulating, but never quite quenching enough for that inherited trait, the thirst for knowledge.

I now have to lay information before a court of law due to the unscrupulous few I have encountered, in my short life, in the British legal industry, milking their positions of privilege for all they are worth, reliant on the bias of both Royal Charter and the 'Memorandum of Understanding' of 'HM Partnership'..

“Her Majesty the Queen and All That”

Maurice — Sat, 27 Dec 2008 04:11:56 GMT

"Her Majesty the Queen and All That" [HM Partnership]

Bob Lomas is absolutely right. The Queen has betrayed the nation, whether from cowardice or self-interest, I know not. Allowing the nation to be Shanghaied into Europe is not the only way in which she has violated her Coronation Oath. In that oath she swore "To Deliver Justice with Mercy", but in so many cases (acting through her judiciary) she has failed to deliver either. I expound on that statement later, but first mention the 'contrary argument', which is ALSO 'right':

Albert Burgess says, "... attacking the Queen is counter productive, ... the average man and woman in the street thinks she is wonderful and we need Mr and Mrs Average to help us win this fight but we will not get them if we attack the Queen".

Could someone brighter than me tell how these two valid arguments can be resolved?

Anne Palmer suggests that judges might be our saviours.

Some will say that I exaggerate in saying that the judiciary is totally corrupt, from top to bottom. Granted, there are many who try to do the right thing much of the time, but the REAL test comes when one of the rotten apples among them is under threat: - they close ranks to protect each other!

Nowhere is this more noticeable than in the European Court of Human Rights. Britain being the main European victor in WW II, British lawyers, led by Sir David Maxwell Fyffe QC (later Lord Chancellor Kilmuir) were given the job of drafting the Convention. They purported to follow the UN Universal Declaration on Human Rights, but the small print inserted made it very different! In particular, it was drafted to ensure that British judges were never called to account - nor have they been.

I end by repeating something that worries me greatly: all those who want us out of Europe talk as though all our problems stem from Europe, & will end if we leave. Taking that stance, they are turning a blind eye to the fact that Britain is ALREADY a ruthless, lawless, murderous & merciless '1984' Police State. Leaving Europe will not alter that.

Norman Scarth.

24^th Dec from Maurice Kirk

The Queen

Our current monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, has, I suspect, very little say in the way our HM courts are currently administered.

Ever since William and Mary, circa 1700 and the ending for good the ‘Absolute Monarch' system, if ever ‘devil worship' and ‘deceit' have been needed, as judicial cornerstones for our successive governments to do their bidding, then I am sure it was never knowingly ratified by Her Majesty.

I am no academic, of course and base my view on a limited education but see, unlike the vast majority of the electorate, time and time again, what actually goes on in our courts and especially behind closed doors. I for one will never ever trust a UK judge who swears his or her allegiance to the HM Partnership or any branch of the media that continues to wax eloquent, without facts, on the merits of such a clearly obscene system, driven by avarice.

It is therefore quite counterproductive implicating The Queen, just now, to try and sway in our direction the far too small a ‘thinking/interested section' of the general public even if Her Majesty is in league with HM Partnership. Her Majesty has far too many positive and admirable attributes, for which I am grateful, to bring her personally into what we are currently so successfully exposing. Later, perhaps, when I see hard evidence.

It is far too big a step to implicate the Royal Family when we have so much hard evidence already ‘Jo Public' can understand. It is so simple. There are far too many accountable to noone for their conduct in court, except to Their Maker, ‘failed disclosure' of evidence by the Executive and their agents is rife and my own miserable failure, for example, the inability to obtain either independent, competent or trustworthy legal representation to fight the evil little ‘bastards'.

We have been fortunate to have such a good queen for so long. Let us not spoil things now, while we are winning.

Cyberspace will prevail even if I don't.

Maurice 2

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/

24^th Dec from Norman Scarth

Thank you Maurice for giving me the opportunity to bring MY 'light from under the bushel'. .

You mention, "what actually goes on in our courts and especially behind closed doors".
My single-handed success in the European Court of Human Rights brought a vital change in British law, incorporated into the 1998 Human Rights Act (confirmed by letter dated 1st Sept.1998 from Geoffrey Hoon MP, then Lord Chancellor Irvine's spokesman in the House of Commons).

ALL hearings, including those 'In Chambers' are "open to the public, other than in exceptional circumstances" (which must be stated).

Yes, they will still hold hearings behind closed doors when there are no 'exceptional circumstances'.

You must challenge them by reminding them of the ECtHR ruling in 'Scarth v UK, 33745/96'.
That ruling is much hated by lawyers & judges, & I am hated for it, as evidenced by the sadistic, seriously criminal & potentially lethal treatment meted out to me since.

Norman Scarth.

24^th Dec from Bob Lomas

Maurice Kirk it seems lives in the same world of fiction as Captain Kirk. Mr Kirk writes below:

"We have been fortunate to have such a good queen for so long. Let us not spoil things now, while we are winning."

Is Mr Kirk naive or a Europhile? In 1972 Elizabeth II broke her coronation oath to her people and agreed to surrender the sovereignty of the nation to the Roman Catholic based and Vatican driven Franco German Axis, is that being a good Queen? Since then the Queen has signed a succession of treaties surrendering this nation's independence, finalising the deal by signing up to the Lisbon Treaty. Is that what being a good Queen is all about? Does Mr Kirk not understand that our Monarch is supposed to be the Governor of the nation, our Sovereign Head of State, the defender of our laws, Constitution and Religion?

Perhaps like Elizabeth II Mr Kirk does not believe in our Constitution and Religion. On the other hand, if he does, he may find this report interesting.

As for winning, well, maybe he does live in his own world of make-believe.

Elizabeth II and the Roman Catholic Church.

1951 Princess Elizabeth visited the Pope.

1951 The Reich re-emerged as the Europäische Gemeinschaft für Kohle und Stahl

(European Coal and Steel Community.)

1953 June 2^nd The Queen's Coronation Oath : ""I Elizabeth do solemnly and sincerely in the presence of God profess, testify, and declare that I am a faithful Protestant."

The Archbishop of Canterbury asked Elizabeth II "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God the true Profession of the Gospel and the Protestant Reform Religion established by law?" The Queen answered: "The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God."

1961 May 5th Queen Elizabeth visited the Pope. The Queen wore black and the veil in recognition of her heresy in the eyes of the Roman Church, thus acknowledging her acceptance of the primacy of the Roman Church. To accept such primacy, which implies jurisdiction, in Rome is to imply that that primacy also applies here in England. Such recognition breaks Article 37 of the 39 Articles of Religion of The Anglican Reformed Church of England which states that "The Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this realm of England". The Pope is the Bishop of Rome.

1961 August 9th Her Majesty's Prime Minister Harold Macmillian applied for negotiations for EEC entry.

The European Economic Community.

The Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinshaft. (Originally drawn up in 1942)

1972 January 22nd The Queen commanded her plenipotentiaries Heath, Hurd and Rippon to sign up to the Treaty of Rome. The Queen undoubtedly fully understood that, as there was no provision under the terms of the Treaty for a Constitutional Monarchy within the EU, she would be surrendering the sovereign supremacy of her office to the sovereign supremacy of the European Community. That by so doing, she would be breaking her Coronation Oath to her people which is her contract with them for their governance. That she would be stripping herself of her Sovereignty in Parliament thus destroying the authority of Parliament itself as the national legislating body in Great Britain. That she would also be breaking article 37 of the 39 of the Articles of Religion of the Anglican Reformed Church of England, and dismissing herself as Governor of that Church. She would thus expose the Anglican Reformed Church to the covert insurgencies of dedicated British papists. The Queen must have been aware that the European Community was predominately of the Roman Catholic religion, that it was founded by Jesuits, and had adopted as its emblem the Halo of the Madonna, an idolatrous Roman Catholic symbol to those of the Protestant Church of England, thus breaking the Second of the Ten Commandments.

1972 October 17th The Queen gave her Royal Assent to the European Communities Act 1972.

1980 October 17th The Queen visited the Pope, she wore black and the veil, and kissed the Papal ring, a gesture of her subordination to the office of the Pope and his jurisdiction over her; and by so doing the Queen forfeited the allegiance of the British people. She could not have done this had she still been our Sovereign Monarch and Governor of the Protestant Reformed Church of England.

1982 The Queen invited the Pope to visit the United Kingdom, she also invited the Pope to celebrate mass in Canterbury Cathedral, the Mother Church of the Church of England, which the Duke of Norfolk, the leading RC peer, and the Earl of March were commanded to organise. Gold and platinum plaques were struck by the Royal Mint to celebrate the occasion, bearing the heads of the Queen and the Pope, thus ensuring that even if the Queen did not attend the mass in person, she would be present in image. Ultimately the event was abandoned when certain clerics of the Church of England protested that the it would break church law.

1980s/90s. Coin of the Realm. There are Gibraltan 20 pence coins in circulation which on one side depict the Queen's head, on the other an image of the Madonna and Child, both crowned and seated on a throne, bearing the inscription: "Our Lady of Europe". These coins must have been minted at the Royal Mint. The Queen must have given her approval both of their design and for their production, despite the image being in violation of the second Commandment, and idolatrous in the eyes of Protestants and the Anglican Reformed Church, of which the Queen is Governor.

1992 February 7th The Queen commanded her plenipotentiaries Douglas Hurd and Francis Maude to sign up to the Maastricht Treaty thus making her a citizen of the EU. No one can be both citizen and Sovereign at the same time. Her EU citizenship was confirmed by the then Prime Minister John Major. Had the Queen still been Sovereign Monarch, Major would have been committing perjury and treason. He has never been impeached for his statement. At about this time the Queen sent the Stone of Scone back to Scotland, on the advice of John Major, an action suggesting the Queen's recognition that there would be no further Coronations of our kings or queens in our country. She has broken the Succession to the Throne of the United Kingdom.

(Coronation Service June 2nd. 1953: )

"I Elizabeth do solemnly and sincerely in the presence of God profess, testify, and declare that I am a faithful Protestant."

November the 30th. 1995 marked the day Her Majesty the Queen attended a Service of Commemoration at Westminster Cathedral to mark the Centenary of the building of this spiritual centre of Roman Catholicism in Britain. In doing so Her Majesty belied the declaration above as well as her Coronation Oath. Her attendance was intended to underline ecumenical reconciliation and unity. In fact it symbolizes the continuing retreat of the Protestant identity of our nation and anticipates the removal of the Act of Settlement and the resulting constitutional redundancy of the Monarchy. Here is another event in the ecumenical process that, step by step, is pulling up the historic roots of the Protestant throne.

1999. 12th May. The Pope was recognised as the overall authority in the Christian world by an Anglican and Roman Catholic commission, made up of Anglican and Roman Catholic Bishops, including the Bishop of Canterbury. The Anglican Bishops involved acted in breach of their oaths of allegiance to the Crown, and Article 37 of the 39 Articles of Religion.

As Governor of the Anglican Reformed Church the Queen must have given her approval to the participation by the Anglican Bishops in this commission.

1999. May. The Queen made Cardinal Hume a member of the Order of Merit, an honour she has never bestowed on any Archbishop of Canterbury.

2000 October 17th The Queen visited the Pope in Rome. Again she wore black and the veil, and kissed the Papal Ring in an act of subjugation. In 2004 the Queen commanded her plenipotentiaries Blair and Straw to sign up on her behalf to the EU constitutional treaty.

Note:

The Protestant part of the Coronation Oath, detested by the Roman Catholic hierarchy, has also been changed over time. Prior to 1910, it read: ‘To maintain the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law'. George III was subjected to a strong attack on the ‘Protestant Oath'. He rebutted it with these famous words: "Where is the power on earth to absolve me from the observance of every sentence of that Oath, particularly the one requiring me to maintain the Protestant Reformed Religion? Was not my family seated on the Throne for that express purpose, and shall I be the first to suffer it to be undermined, perhaps overturned? No, No, I had rather beg my bread from door to door throughout Europe, than consent to any such measure. I can give up my crown and retire from power. I can quit my palace and live in a cottage. I can lay my head on a block and lose my life, but I cannot break my Oath. If I violate that Oath, I am no longer legal Sovereign in this country".

King Edward VII died on Friday, 6th May 1910. The following Monday, the Times published part of a letter from Irish Nationalist MP W.H.E. Redmond, to the Prime Minister, demanding that he take such steps as may be necessary to relieve the new King from the obligation.

Bob Lomas. The Magna Carta Society.

24^th Dec from Maurice Kellett (Maurice 1)

Queen Elizabeth II is a criminal without any shadow of doubt about this fact. The Judicial Oath that all UK judges and magistrates swear only to Queen Elizabeth II is a fraud of massive proportions. It has no meaning except to deceive the people. We in the UK have indeed a criminal as our Head of State. Commonwealth Countries should also be made aware of this fact. Her Mafia which include judges and police officers are real. It's time for we the people to have a say in the way that criminals rule us in the UK.

Queen Elizabeth II is also in breach of her Coronation Oath of 1953. Yes, we do indeed have a criminal as our Head of State. The Royal Prerogative says Queen Elizabeth II is immune from crime. Who has ruled that? A criminal is a criminal regardless of their position.

I know the horror of what the Crown employed Mafia have carried out against me and against many other of its victims. Enough is enough. Queen Elizabeth must be brought to trial for treason against the UK people. Nothing else will serve justice being done. Those who carry out such trial must of course be truly independent.

The word independent is a dirty word to the UK establishment. We the people must change this situation one way or another.

Maurice Kellett.

25^th Dec from Suzon

Dear Maurice, you got the date wrong. It all goes back (at least) to 1066. The Queen and her consort are both direct descendants of William the Conquerer.

Have a lovely Christmas and (I hope) a miraculous new year.

In common cause,

Suzon