Search results matching tags 'Abuse of Process' and 'Professor Roger Wood'

Maurice Jailed Three Times in a Week Fourth Break in & Accused of Fraud

Maurice — Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:11:00 GMT

On 20th July 2013 I am just released after another night in police cells because of liar, MARK DAVENPORT, ringing police to block my getting into the flat for my legal papers required for the final day of my twenty year running damages claim against the South Wales Police.

4th Break-in and theft (16th July 13)

3rd break in and theft (1st June 13)

After an hour in Cardiff Magistrates, before proper Cardiff magistrates for a change and not the usual District Judges, John Charles or Bodfan Jenkins, fundamental issues with the help of the Clerk of the Court were sorted out.

But DAVENPORT had switched off the electric and had changed the locks whilst employing staff who were drawing the dole to help him allow fly tipping on my land.

After I had heard the usual evasion of the truth and shouts of almost, "liar, liar, your pants are on fire", Her Majesty's Representative, as prosecutor believed be also from 9 Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, eventually was made to release, albeit far too late, my custody record including the video made under caution that will knock this new bit of trumped up nonsense right on the head.

Yes, Mr Kirk must be allowed to live at the flat, the court heard and what of the squatter in the shop below, was my reply?

At the end of proceedings I felt it only appropriate to recommend that the Madam Clerk of the Court to be o0ffered a position as an inquisitional judge, as under the laws of Code Napoleon in a court somewhere in Brittany.

Whilst the Cardiff Cabal continues to protect the rogue police doctor and the courts appearing protect the other ring leaders behind my twenty years of purgatory whilst resisting both extreme and unusual irregularities from those in positions of privilege the Cardiff courts will continue to have my most undivided attention.

Her Majesty's representative again misled the court concerning the outstanding matter of the rogue police psychiatrist.

The Caswell Clinic psychiatrist and his Cardiff Cabal are still maintaining, three years on from the MAPPA level 3 'machine gun' acquittal, that their victim is still 'medically unfit to plead or stand trial' when it so suits but not when circumstances are not helpful for them (see The Times On Line' comment below).

Meanwhile I remain diagnosed with 'irreversible significant brain damage' and possibly cancer that caused the current Defendant, in these current civil proceedings, on 2nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, to recommend, via barrister Richard Thomlow of 9 Park Place Chambers , Cardiff, to recommend that I be incarcerated in High Security Psychiatric Hospital most likely for life.

NHS (Wales), at Caswell Clinic, are reliant on not just a brain scan interpreted by someone without the appropriate qualifications after using the wrong techniques but on its supporting documentation for the Cardiff court stating I have significant brain damage because:

1. I had been an old drinking partner of actor, Oliver Reed Esq

2. I had ditched my WW2 aircraft in the Caribbean and

3. had flown all the way to Australia without a map

(Extracted from 18th Sept 2009 supporting report by Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University e-mailed to Dr Ruth Bagshaw of Caswell Clinic prison all of which, so far, is accepted by eleven Cardiff judges)

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

This continuing bullying by the police and causing false imprisonments, just as with their refusing to release of my own 5 page victim statement following complaint, last year, by this same Caswell Clinic psychiatrist having had me locked up in prison for weeks following his latest fanciful delusions that I had been around to his home and harassed both he and a DR JANIS HILLIER I have never even met.

The release of these 13th July 13 custody records together with the video record of my 'Defence Statement', in rebuttal to an allegation of two common assaults on DAVENPORT and another, are needed as exhibits inTuesday's County Court hearing before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC on the final day of the first three of seven damages claims listed soon for a hearing.

On that 13th July 13 I was arrested by a PC Charles......"Any relation?", I asked the court.

And by 7.30pm on 19th July I am again arrested and with hand cuffs behind my back hauled into a police car with not even the right to have a road side breath test. Hang on here, I said, it was I that asked for police officers to attend this time!

I was also arrested just a few weeks ago whilst quietly parked on private property, on the pretext of 'drink drive' but with no moving traffic offence as their excuse.

In both these 'drink drive' incidents there was significant delay for over one hour before having to provide a specimen of breath!

The 2nd delay was one hour and thirty five minutes and was deliberate for senior officers, no doubt, to be contacted to set up another conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Remember, please, the numerous police incidents in the three current claims for damages contain three road side incidents recording positive specimen of breath taken but all zero within one hour of my arrests.

POLICE IGNORE MY COMPLAINT OF UNLAWFUL FLY TIPPING BY MARK DAVENPORT

Before

After

I am now told MARK DAVENPORT had reported me to police for fraudulently drawing up a falsely represented lease causing the severe banging on my door to occur recently and my camera to recording from my window, a 'paddy wagon' sitting patiently outside following my subsequent arrest.

Despite my repeated visits to Ely, Fairwater and Barry police stations, in an attempt to establish just what is going on and to file a statement of complaint, I am ignored.

Paranoia? Deja Vu?

175 Attempted Arrest for Fraud.docx

On Tuesday at 10.30am, in The Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, the police may need to attempt to explain away not just how on getting a positive road side breath test and back at the police station my sample of breath was zero on the definitive test but how was it my specimen of breath on the 19th July was zero when a pocket book entry should have recorded I was drinking from a wine bottle at the time of my arrest

E-MAIL TO MAGISTRATES

Maurice Kirk

13:45 (0 minutes ago)

to Cardiff.crn.cm2

Further to my suggestion of putting the sledge hammer down and using my car to break in instead......trust me, that is what I will do if the court does not immediately take appropriate action on the police in preventing my visiting the premises and the squatter, Davenport, for switching off my electricity supply, changing the lock and allowing illegal fly tipping on my land.

Be so good, please, as to inform the 19h July 13 three lay magistrates and lady clerk of the court of the current situation, also summarised on my current blog:

THE LAW AND WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT

Smart v The Forensic Science Service Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 783 (02 July 2013).mht

The Cardiff judges have decided to protect the corrupt NHS (Wales) administration who , in turn, on mass. are protecting two doctors pleading 'off sick' at YOUR expense for well over a year now so neither can be summonsed to the Kirk v south Wales Police final hearing on Tuesday to explain their employment by MAPPA and NHS (Wales) following The then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, having failed in having me shot MAPPA level 3v victim in June 2009 when a police helicopter and Operation Orchid failed to snatch our 10 year old daughter.. Her ordering that the machine gun be painted a different colour, to fool the jury was known by the trial judge.......a further indication aod just what rwally goes on in our UK courts and one near you.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/_A300_100_2C00_000-Machine-Gun-Reward.aspx

I AM ENTITLED TO A REMEDY FOLLOWING THIS DOCTOR REPEATEDLY FALSIFYING EVIDENCE BEFORE CARDIFF CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURTS AND ALWAYS PROTECTED BY SOUTH WALES POLICE WITH THEIR OWN EVIL AGENDA

DO COME ALONG TO THE TUESDAY COURT HEARING AND LEARN A LOT LOT MORE

My Telephone number:: 07907937953

My e-mail address: m aurice@kirkflyingvet.com

AND after

Test fly ( preferably with wings on)

And then test fly G-KURK to South Africa!

(Waiting at the northern most aerodrome in Japan, for two weeks, waiting for a 30 knot tail wind to get Liberty Girl to Alaska)

Not forgetting petition to be handed in on Friday, in Downing Street, re Snatched Children Petition like South Wales Police Operation Orchid on our 10 year old daughter:

http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/2013/07/21/maurice-gagged-the-unique-legal-weapon-in-uk-secret-family-courts/

13 07 22 Mr M Murphy 3^rd Witness Statement

Statement of Truth

22^nd July 2013

I, Michael Murphy of The Old Police Station, Barry, confirm that the content of this, my statement, is true to the best of my belief.

Back in the mid 90s Mr Kirk had flown over my scrap yard, situated next to Barry harbour to identify his car lying there and then reported me to the police for theft.

A neighbour had previously arranged to have Mr Kirk’s car towed off private land to the rear of his veterinary hospital in Tynewydd Road, Barry and onto the adjacent public road.

Mr Button had then telephoned me to say that I was to remove the vehicle from the public highway but was to keep it for a minimum of fourteen days.

If by then it had not been recovered by the rightful owner then I was allowed to dispose of it as I pleased.

Signed:

7th June 13 Royal Courts of Justice Hearing Right to Tape Record and Call Defendant as Witness

Maurice — Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:26:00 GMT

AN E-MAIL WITH NO RESPONSE

FAO Mr Justice Morgan

6^th June 2013 12.02pm

FAO Hearings Cardiff County Court                       BS614159

22nd & 23rd May2013 Claimant Position Statements Ruling

Further to my visit to the court to collect the 'by Tuesday' ruling, promised at the last day of the hearing, l have telephoned today about the Claimant being able to refer to it in RCJ on 7th June 13 as the alternative, possibly, to Barbara Wilding being the subject of the proceedings as past Chief Constable.

Her 'oh so dodgy' 25th Feb 2009 sworn affidavit was written with malice aforethought and proved in court following 99 witnesses's evidence.

There is no need for the Defendant's legal team
to attend as the tape recording issue is not for them.

If the outstanding ruling is substituted for Mr Justice Morgan to consider then compromise as to which witnesses should still be allowed to give evidence could be settled between parties NOW

Without that ruling causes me to remain in some difficulties for tomorrow's RCJ application

Please forward to RCJ as I still cannot find the RCJ ref number or e-mail.

Thankyou

28 May 2013   Further ruling on second list of witnesses whom Mr Kirk wishes to call.

On 29 April 2013, at a time when the Defendant were shortly to call their last witness, Mr Kirk delivered a written list of 44 witnesses whom he wished to call. On 1^st May 2013 I delivered a written ruling identifying which witnesses he was to be permitted to call. I did so pursuant to the responsibility upon the court to control the evidence by giving directions, and actively to case manage the case, under CPR 32.1 and CPR 1.4. In that written ruling it I set out the nature of the present proceedings; the Orders which have been made previously, setting out in particular the dates by which witness statements, or witness summaries, had been required to be served; the background from 2008 to date in respect of preparation of the present trial insofar as it permitted or impeded Mr Kirk’s ability to prepare evidence and secure witness statements or summaries; and the principles by which the court is governed in respect of the calling of witnesses. I adopt that in full for the purpose of the present ruling and I do not repeat it here.

Since then, Mr Kirk has given evidence over several days and has called 13 witnesses. By a Position Statement dated 22^nd May 2013 Mr Kirk served a further written list of some 19 named witnesses he would wish to call. I stated on 24 May that I would again give ruling in writing. This is (i) for clarity as to my reasons and (ii) for ease of access to a record of the ruling. I understand that a hearing is listed for Friday 7 June 2013 to consider permission to appeal (and/or appeal itself) against my ruling of 1 May 2013. I will in this ruling list the witnesses individually in this ruling, as I did in the last, by number and name in Mr Kirk’s list but preceded by a letter “B”, to avoid confusion, assuming that the present ruling may also be the subject of application for permission to appeal.

B1.       Ex-Inspector Coliandris. This is a former police officer. In these proceedings the Defendant gave an undertaking to call or tender any witness in respect of whom a witness statement had been lodged, so long as that was a presently serving officer and thus within the control of the Defendant; but expressly did not give that undertaking in respect of any witness who was no longer a serving police officer. I was told that Mr Coliandris was reluctant to attend court because of his state of health. I am aware that he wrote to the court himself seeking to inform the court confidentially of his state of health and his reservations, but stating that he did not want these details to be made known to Mr Kirk. I declined to read his representations so long as he wished the content of his communications to be kept from one of the parties and I so informed them. In the event Mr Coliandris was not called and the Defendant did not seek to tender his evidence, whether live or under the Civil Evidence Act.

Mr Kirk does not articulate the nature of the evidence which he believes Mr Coliandris could give. On the face of his witness statement Mr Coliandris is not a direct witness to any fact or incident in issue. He appears to have looked into complaint by Mr Kirk, without identifying relevant material evidence. If so, then this appears to be a witness whom Mr Kirk wishes to call blind, in the hope of either fishing for evidence in support of his case or simply cross-examining the witness in support of the same exercise. I have also sought to be alert to the possibility that a witness might be able to assist, as to the matters in issue, if he is referred to in documents before the court; but I have identified no such reference.

Accordingly I rule against permission to call this witness.

B2.       Ex Chief Inspector Trigg. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 15 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. No new material is advanced. The same considerations apply. Accordingly I still rule against permission to call Mr Trigg.

B3.      Mr Brian Genner. This is a witness who has given evidence in relation to the events of 6 June 1995. Mr Anthony Gafael and his girlfriend Alison Genner the daughter of this witness were excluded that day from their flat, an incident which led to prosecution of Mr Kirk, and in respect of which Mr Kirk complains that police officers forced entry through a roller shutter door to Mr Kirk’s premises. There are discrepancies between the account in the witness statement for these proceedings of Sergeant Roe (as he was in 1995) and others, including Mr Genner, as to when Roe was present or what he did. In the case of Mr Roe, Mr Kirk produced after Mr Roe’s evidence a statement of the time from Sergeant Roe which appeared clearly inconsistent with what Mr Roe had told me. I therefore permitted Mr Roe, exceptionally, to be recalled for further cross-examination. The inconsistencies have been explored in cross-examination by Mr Kirk and in questions from myself.

Mr Kirk seeks that Mr Genner be recalled also. However the evidence of Mr Genner has been given. The evidence of Anthony Gafael has now been given. If there is material in the evidence of Mr Genner (or Mr Gafael) on which Mr Kirk seeks to rely, or inconsistencies in the evidence between witnesses on which he seeks to rely, that is available in closing submissions and will be for me to consider as in any other case. Unlike Mr Roe, there is no earlier inconsistent written statement of Mr Genner relied upon (which in any event, if it had been available, ought to have been put to him), nor other proper reason for him to be recalled.

B4.       Mr Roe. He has been recalled once (see above). It would be wholly exceptional for a witness to be recalled for a second time. I have now heard evidence from Mr Gafael. However Mr Kirk identifies nothing new which would justify, and I have failed to identify anything in the evidence of Mr Gafael which would justify, recalling Mr Roe.

B5.       Ex Chief Inspector Colin Jones. Mr Kirk states that he is a “key player”. A chief reason for Mr Kirk’s interest is that at one of Mr Kirk’s appeals in the Crown Court a police officer attended as an observer, when he was seen to be nodding towards a police officer PC Rewbridge during the giving of her evidence. According to Mr Kirk, when asked to explain himself, the police officer said he was attending on instruction from Chief Inspector Colin Jones. Inferentially, Mr Kirk believes that Mr Colin Jones is, or may be, one of the senior police officers whom he passionately believes to have conspired to hound him.

As with a number of police officers whom Mr Kirk wished to call in his list of 29 April 2013, (i) there is no statement from the proposed witness (ii) it is wholly unlikely that the witness will give a statement, and (iii) there is no direct evidence of connection of the witness with the specific matters in issue in these proceedings. I consider that the real wish of Mr Kirk is to cross-examine the witness in the hope that something might turn up; but that there is no discernible prospect that such an exercise would assist the court.

B6.       Inspector Andrew Rice. Mr Kirk has submitted on a great number of occasions that Mr Rice should be recalled. Evidence has been given by a Mr Alexander-Ebbs that he attended Aust Service Station to give a witness statement, in respect of an assault he alleged against Mr Kirk, at a meeting attended by a number of persons including Mr Rice, where he was encouraged to “sex up” his account. However Mr Alexander-Ebbs was present in person at this court on 21^st February 2013 during the continued evidence of Mr Rice; gave a witness statement on that day making the allegations against Mr Rice; and these allegations were put to Mr Rice. Otherwise, Mr Kirk assets that Mr Rice must have been aware fo covert surveillance of Mr Kirk; and/or he now wonders whether it was Mr Rice whom he sought to “arrest” outside the magistrates’ court (rather than a Sergeant Hill) when handing over a file which Mr Kirk thought might contain important real evidence. In my respectful judgment there is, (and there continues to be), no justification for the recall of Mr Rice.

B7.       Inspector Steve Parry. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 43 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. No new material is advanced. The same considerations apply. Accordingly I still rule against permission to call Mr Parry.

B8.       Jonathan Clayton.   I made ruling in respect of Mr Clayton on 1 May 2013. No witness statement or witness summary has been served in respect of him. He is said to be relevant to the incident of 4 July 1999, but it is not said that he was a direct witness to any of the events of that day. If anything, there is less reason now for him to be called, in that Mr Kirk’s witness Susan Jenkins has given evidence of what is required of those flying from one airport and air traffic control zone to another; and Mr Aishe has given evidence of the closeness of the police helicopter to Mr Kirk’s aircraft I discern no sufficient or good reason for him to be called.

B9.      Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding. This is another renewed application – in respect of witness 2 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. Mr Kirk identifies nothing new. The same considerations apply now as did then. Accordingly I still rule against permission to call this witness.

B10.     Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brien. The position statement itself articulates no cause for him to be called. Orally, Mr Kirk said he was an important witness because he gave evidence which “caused the case [against Mr Kirk] to collapse”. I did not find it easy to follow what this evidence was supposed to be. It seemed to be that an HORT1 form was said by the police officers to have been served upon Mr Kirk, yet no document was ever traced, nor an audit trial provided for such a document, hence the case against Mr Kirk failed. However, to the extent that this is right, Mr Kirk may in any event rely upon it.

This is an incident of May 1995. in which Mr Kirk shows particular interest, in that Special Constable Deren Martin says that she served him with an HORT1 form; and has given evidence that she made enquiries with the police in Guernsey (in pursuit of whether Mr Kirk’s vehicle was or was not exempt from vehicle excise licence), being told that there was warrant for his arrest outstanding. This fuels Mr Kirk’s suspicion and belief that he was the subject of harassment by police in Wales because of his past travails with Guernsey police.

Nonetheless, it seems to me that Mr O’Brian is a paradigm case of a proposed witness from whom there is no witness statement or summary, no reason to suppose that the witness (if he can be found) will give a statement, no indication whether he would remember whether another officer served an HORT1 firm on Mr Kirk on a day 18 years ago, SC Deren Martin being the officer in the case, and one whom Mr Kirk hopes to cross-examine despite him being called as his own witness, in the hope that something might turn up. Accordingly I decline to give permission for this witness to be called.

B11.     Ex SC Ridley. Mr Kirk tells me, (if I have succeeded in following him correctly), that Mr Ridley was the investigating officer for the same incident as resulted in police photographs being taken of his vehicle (as was done for SC Deren Martin for the May 1995 incident). Similar considerations apply as with SC O’Brien. So far as I can see, this is fishing in the dark. In default of witness statement, or the beginnings of a witness summary, I cannot justify permission to call the witness.

B12.    Mrs Diana Graham. Mr Kirk asks for a “foreign witness summons”. This witness lives in France. The Claimant’s Witness Bundle includes at page 91-123 a statement, not in proper form, by this witness with associated documents. The bulk of the statement relates to the proceedings which followed the Vale of Glamorgan Show incident of August 1998, (Action 3, “2”). This is one of the claims struck out by my rulings of November 2010. Accordingly that which relates to it is not now material.

Much of the rest relates to how Mr Kirk was dealt with on occasions in court, by magistrates (and occasionally by judges, including judges in the Divisional Court), some of it clearly recording what Mr Kirk said to her and some although much less clearly being personal observation on the part of Mrs Graham. I informed the parties that I would read this statement and discard all that related to the Vale of Glamorgan Show. I do not envisage that Mrs Graham could assist me significantly further by giving evidence orally and, as I have made clear on a number of occasions, it is not permissible to call a witness in the hope that she might add something further which is not contained either in a witness statement or witness summary. Not least, if there were anything material for Mrs Graham to add, the time has long passed when such material was required to be lodged with the court. I will treat the statement as admitted in evidence, but I will make no further order.

B13.     Mr Gafael. He has now been called, since I directed steps for bailiff service of Notice to show Cause which secured his attendance on 24 May 2013.

B14.     G. Thomas. Without agreeing the content of the statement, the Defendant is content that the statement be read.   The same applies to a Mr Kirke (as to maintenance of tyres on vehicles of Mr Kirk), whom Mr Kirk raised orally on 23 May 2103 as a potential witness.

B15.    Nigel Thomas. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 30 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. No statement has been produced. No new material is advanced and the same considerations apply as before. I rule against deferment of conclusion of the evidence in order for him to be searched for and thus against permission to call Mr Thomas.

B17.     Mrs Kirstie Kirk. In the event she has been called.

B18.     Mrs G Jones. This appears not to be pursued by Mr Kirk.

B19.     Mrs J Hanson. Mr Kirk told me that he had ‘lost her statement’. In fact there is a letter from her at page 168 (Claimant’s Witness Bundle) which raises complaint about disturbance from his wayward tenants. Mr Kirk and Barry police officer witnesses whom I have heard agree the problems with alcoholism, and bad behaviour on the part of his tenants, in particular a Mr Paul Stringer and a Mr Burns. Oral evidence from Mrs Hanson, not found or available to date, is not reasonably necessary for me to deal justly with the matters in issue.

With the exception of one witness, there is no other witness whom Mr Kirk wishes to call. That exception is B16, a Michael Murphy. The Defendant made clear a considerable time ago that that it objected to reception of the evidence without the opportunity to cross-examine the witness. No witness summons was served in respect of this witness. Mr Kirk told me on Friday 24 May that he had expected the witness to be present voluntarily that day. However there was, and has been since, no communication to the court from the witness.

It is understandable that the Defendant should object to his short statement being admitted without the opportunity to cross-examine him. The statement is one compiled by Mr Kirk in September 2010, with an added signature of the witness, and in manuscript the words “content below relating to me is true to the best of belife(sic)”. It describes him as a scrap dealer previously reported for stealing a veterinary practice car back in 1996 (presumably Mr Kirk’s veterinary practice); and the police are said to have told the witness on the one hand “I want you to take it back immediately to Penarth police station, where I will later inform Kirk it has been traced” and on the other hand one of the police is said to have jumped into the scrap dealer’s cab and himself to have driven it to Penarth: the two clearly conflict. On the other hand the statement reads that the police told him “We hate Kirk’s guts” and that the policeman said he would “have the greatest of pleasure in booking Kirk when he comes to collect it and drives it away without tax, MOT or insurance”.

The failure to appear without explanation, to support the statement such as I have described it, is not a prepossessing basis to ask for the court to appoint another day of hearing. If all, or even some, of Mr Kirk’s complaints of police harassment and bad faith are upheld, on the other evidence I have heard over some 49 days, the evidence of the scrap dealer suspected of stealing the practice car in 1996 will be peripheral; if few, or none are upheld it will be improbable that the evidence of Mr Murphy would tilt the balance on any of them. The court has gone to what I consider to be extreme lengths, in order to accommodate genuine difficulties to Mr Kirk in preparing his case, and those which are of his own making; and has granted great latitude to him in calling witnesses despite failure to serve statements in the form and by the dates stipulated. Applying the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly and proportionately, I do not consider it reasonably necessary that the court should appoint another day for hearing of evidence in the case of this witness.

28 May 2013.                                      His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn, QC

Appellants’ Skeleton Argument for Mr Justice Morgan              BS416159

(Late due to the Appellant waiting for the written rulings of his last applications before Cardiff County Court in time to appeal at Royal Courts of Justice and without it am unable to adequately comment on the Respondent’s skeleton argument with errors and huge assumptions)

There are but three issues for His Lordship to consider,

1)    the right for the Claimant to have the Defendant(s) give evidence in the light of the apparent criminal intent born out both in evidence and contained within the paragraphs of the Chief Constable’s 25^th February 2009 sworn affidavit in another attempt to avoid disclosure of relevant evidence under his/her control since 1992 to date

2)    the right for the Claimant to have senior police officers, identified both before and during the trial, to give evidence or to be recalled, with or without witness statements, concerning their apparent course of conduct to both prejudice the Claimant’s health and his basic right to bring a claim for civil damages in the first place

3)    for the Claimant or his legal representatives to only tape record evidence given on oath, under the strict supervision of the court and/or to be supplied with an audible copy of court proceedings as is allowed all over the world nowadays, including in England.

Witnesses

The Claimant’s right to call both a competent and compellable witness when, by law, a witness is ‘anybody’s property’ and especially, as in this case of these first three of nine Actions for damages against the South Wales Police, one Defendant, as the example, has been identified as signing her own 2009 affidavit (attached) knowing or ought to have known it to be riddled with lies and supports the Appellant’s argument that the Defendant has carried out a course of conduct tantamount to both unusual and extreme bullying with criminal intent.

Analysis of 25^th February 2009 Barbara Wilding Affidavit:

18.   para 8.23

Another traffic incident and a Barry court case was born out in evidence making her denial there ever was one another of her lies to bury the truth of a clear conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The lengths to which key players, mostly senior police officers, have been protected in these civil proceedings, is scandalous.

19.   para 8.26 as per paragraph 13

20.   para 8.13

The incident when my Guernsey registered BMW motorcycle was stolen while her covert surveillance police were at the scene, my Barry veterinary Hospital, when the theft took place, makes her denial the police removed the number plate, on recovery, just one more of her lies.

2^nd Action

23.   para 5.1

The incident of her officers falsifying Barry magistrates evidence by trying to ‘frame me’ for someone else’s speeding offence was proved in court with the subsequent arrest of the lawyer and seizure of the Crown Prosecution Service’s file makes her denial there ever was an incident or a court case one more of her lies.

The fact that Dolmans, solicitors, admit CPS prosecutor, Stan Soffa, did not wish to be called as her defence witness beggars belief and anyway, who’s counting the incidents committed by the police?

27. to 29   para 10.1

First arrested for the theft of a car I had already reported as stolen, they having confiscated it and deliberately not told me where it was, just like with my Guernsey registered BMW motorcycle and Honda van, secondly, stopped for speeding and faulty exhaust and then, ten or so minutes later, stopped on some fabrication, to breathalyse, embarrassingly overlooked by the previous officers.

3^rd Action

32.

Her throw away comment of ‘antiquity’ being her excuse of failed disclosure is both insulting and typically arrogant. From 1993 onwards my English solicitors, me or my secretaries would follow up each incident with requests for either disclosure or to preserve their records.

Adrian Oliver drafted her document being a party to the fanciful plan to prejudice these civil proceedings by arresting me for trading in machine guns, carrying a mandatory ten year prison term. Caswell Clinic convened my MAPPA level 3 hearings to have me further incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison but only using their rogue NHS (Wales) psychiatrist promised GMC protection for whatever he said in a Welsh court room.

These following 22^nd and 23^rd May13 Position Statements were subject to appeal to the High Court but have not been adjudicated upon in time, at the Cardiff County Court, for this 7^th June 2013 Royal Courts of Justice Hearing

That coupled with his Lordship’s Order suggesting that this Claimant ‘may or may not be appealing earlier rulings’ over witnesses causes the court to be reminded that this hearing ought to be adjourned for all the reasons set out in the Appellant’s 28^th May Application (attached at the bottom)

22^nd May 13 Claimant Position Statement

1.      The Claimant asks His Honour to consider whether it is fitting that the Defendant be asked to more formally clarify their position on some points that at first may seem unrelated but have a common theme of legal argument around :-

a.       Whether the Claimant should be allowed to amend any of his Claims ‘out of time’.

b.      Be allowed the issue of exemplary and/or aggravated damages to be considered.

c.       Will the Defendants ever stop ‘actually harassing’ the Claimant as for example of in recent times by police using and sending to other police forces information to lead other police forces and other public sector departments to view the Claimant prejudicially by leading them to believe that the Claimant is delusional.

d.      By the Defendant disseminating information to say the Claimant is delusional either that means what they say is untrue and the Defendant refuse to stop harassing the Claimant and may affect the level of damages

e.       Or if what the Defendant disseminates is true then being delusional is a condition which allows the Claimant to be eligible to amend the Claims before the court that are ‘out of time’ by the time limitation period.

2.      The Claimant raises the issues from reading page 198 point 13.40 and related sections of A Practical Approach to Civil Procedure by Stuart Sime, twelfth edition (2009) that says that Judicial reasoning can be that Claims can usually be amended but that an amendment is treated as a new claim and cannot be brought out of time. However page 101 gives explanation on point 7.40 that a Claim (and therefore an amendment to a Claim) can be brought ‘out of time’ if the Claimant had a mental disability at the time the new Claim accrued.

3.      As the Defendant, in recent years, persistently disseminates information about the Claimant, as being delusional, then that means the Claimant may apply to the Court to amend the Claims that accrued when he was delusional.

4.      If the information, disseminated by the Defendant, is not true then that may be relevant exemplary and aggravated damages and even amount to defamation.

5.      If the information that the Defendant disseminates about the Claimant, being delusional, is untrue then the Claimant asks that a statement is made as to when the Defendant will stop disseminating this untrue defamatory information and how it will go about achieving that as well as the Defendants withdrawing what they have sent to many other public bodies, including the Metropolitan Police, the Guernsey police, the French police and even government departments in the royal courts of Justice and Whitehall from around 2002 and onwards when applications were made that the Claimant be registered a Vexatious Litigant and as a MAPPA level 3 victim.

6.      If, on the other hand, the information they disseminate about the Claimant is true then that requires the Defendant to say as from what date he is delusional or with a mental disability as the Claimant can be allowed by the Court to amend any claim that accrued from that date when he first had a mental disability.

7.      As we are aware much by the Claimant is in writing and so if the Defendant gives detail as to the Claimant being delusional, for just one moment, then an independent expert can be used to trace back the detail from that moment identified by the Defendant to where the indication of delusional in writings first emerged.

8.      A critical detail is that the Defendant actually disseminates information to say that the Claimant is delusional for ‘thinking he is harassed by police’.

9.      The Claimant complains to police, at least, as from 20^th June 1993, when the Claimant was in unlawful custody, up an including to today’s Position Statement

10. Given the Defendant disseminates information that the Claimant is delusional, for thinking he is harassed by police, please would the Defendant clarify at what point the Claimant was first displaying being delusional, by complaining he was harassed by police, so that the Claimant can apply to amend his Claims that accrued on or after that date.

11. If the Claimant was not delusional about being harassed by police, yet wrote and complained that he was harassed by police from say, 20^th June 1993, following information given to the Defendant by the Guernsey Police, at what point will the Defendant ensure the Claimant is no longer harassed by police, such as the Defendant stopping disseminating false and malicious information about the Claimant and will the Defendant comment on the obvious reluctance of the Defendant to stop harassing the Claimant in the context of exemplary and/or aggravated damages

A)      Witnesses outstanding in 1-3 Actions

1.       Ex Inspector Colliandris (medical argument irrelevant)

2.       Ex Chief Inspector Sean (Shawn) Trigg (key player)

3.       Ex Brian Jenner (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

4.        Ex Chief Inspector Insp Robert Nelson Roe (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

5.        Ex Chief Inspector Collin Jones (key player)

6.        Inspector Andrew Rice (Recall re 1^st Action 8.23 & CP Ebbs/Alexander)

7.        Inspector Steve Parry (Penal order on Defendant)

8.        Jonathan Clayton Air Traffic Controller (Dangerous flying/Penal Order)

9.        Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding (Defendant)

10.      Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian (Penal Order on Defendant)

11.      Ex Special Constable Ridley (Penal Order on Defendant)

12.       Mrs Diana Graham (Foreign Witness Summons)

13.       A Gafael (re break-in Cardiff Vet surgery/Penal Order)

14.       G Thomas (stolen BMW m/c/ Penal order)

15.       ‘Yosser’ Nigel Thomas (stolen BMW m/c)

16.       Michael Murphy (Defendant’s destruction of Claimant’s vehicles)

17.      Mrs K Kirk

18.      Mrs G Jones

19.      Mrs J Hanson

B)       Application for Jury Trials for:

a)     4^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

b)    5^th Action Machine gun Case/malicious pros, false imprisonments

c)     6^th Action Forensic Psychiatrist/NHS (Wales) False Medical Records

           d)     7^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

     e)     8^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

C)    Claimant’s Fitness to Continue?

D)   Previous ‘struck out’ incidents in 1-3 Actions to be re instated

E)     Current Civil Proceedings (post Woolf/ Human Rights Act)

F) HM Crown Prosecution Service continues to ignore disclosure applications from Claimant, his solicitor or from his barrister re:

              i) Refusal to disclose evidence to clarify NHS psychiatric records at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend

             ii)  Refusal to disclose July 2012 evidence re doctor's statement that caused Claimant imprisoned

            iii) Refusal to disclose depositions re above withdrawn indictment of 'harassment'

          iv) Refusal to disclose depositions re one Lewis machine gun indictment and subsequent acquittal

           v) Refusal to supply Claimant with copy of his own MG11 victim statement re above outstanding issues

            vi) Refusal to supply Claimant with date he was first deemed to have a mental disability

G)     Interim payment for costs and damage

Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                                                  22^nd May 2013

(23^rd May 13 Position Statement mislaid and to follow)

Private Tape Recording, ‘Litigants in Person’ to be awarded legal costs and the Crushing of Family Court Cartels

The future of our UK court administration, if not already a night mare, is a pretty grim one right now with the lack of funding for expertise and the extra work caused by the withdrawal of legal aid.

One’s inability to find a truly independent lawyer these days with ever mounting unexplained costs incurred, should you be so lucky, is why this Claimant is adding to the problem by having to act alone.

Also, if this Claimant’s current Cardiff court action is typical of a ‘litigant in person’ floundering around in a quagmire of both regulation and custom with fast aging faculties barely keeping his head above water, then what is the future of our law courts when many more are forced to do the same?

In order for ‘litigants in person’ to achieve anything from the clear futility of it all then to further break down lucrative and unfair cartels, as currently practiced in the UK courts, is what each must strive to do and share any information from one’s mistakes.

This Claimant suggests we remain vigilant in what is to be ultimately achieved, the significant reform of a grossly outdated money driven judiciary and not to allow our own court cases to over shadow this primary objective, the clinching of that man made concept, some call ‘justice’ for all parties.

In The High Court Royal Courts of Justice                                                     BS614159

Before Mr Justice Morgan

Maurice Kirk v Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

Appellant’s Application to Adjourn of 7^th June 13 High Court Hearing

Further to the 14^th May 2013 High Court Order of the Honourable Mr Justice Morgan the Appellant applies for an appropriate adjournment in order to:

12. Obtain the official transcript as he was unable to tape record for his own use within the case in preparation for subsequent appeal(s)

13. obtain clarification as to which of the outstanding witnesses, identified in his 22^nd and 23^rd May 13 Position Statements to the Crown Court judge and

14. in the light of the enclosed further statement of A G Gafael and The Defendant’s February 2009 sworn Affidavit and

15. concerning the proposed 28^th May 13 ruling , by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, due to be handed down today and

16. For appellant to obtain fee exemption in order to complete his prosecution and subsequent appeal(s)

AND

17. The Appellant asks the court to consider whether it is fitting that the Defendant be asked to more formally clarify their position on some points that at first may seem unrelated but have a common theme of legal argument around :-

f.        Whether the Appellant should be allowed to amend any of his Claims ‘out of time’.

g.       Be allowed the issue of exemplary and/or aggravated damages to be considered.

h.       Will the Defendants ever stop ‘actually harassing’ the Appellant as for example of in recent times by police using and sending to other police forces information to lead other police forces and other public sector departments to view the Appellant prejudicially by leading them to believe that the Appellant is delusional.

i.         By the Defendant disseminating information to say the Appellant is delusional either that means what they say is untrue and the Defendant refuse to stop harassing the Appellant and may affect the level of damages

j.        Or if what the Defendant disseminates is true then being delusional is a condition which allows the Appellant to be eligible to amend the Claims before the court that are ‘out of time’ by the time limitation period.

18. The Appellant raises the issues from reading page 198 point 13.40 and related sections of A Practical Approach to Civil Procedure by Stuart Sime, twelfth edition (2009) that says that Judicial reasoning can be that Claims can usually be amended but that an amendment is treated as a new claim and cannot be brought out of time. However page 101 gives explanation on point 7.40 that a Claim (and therefore an amendment to a Claim) can be brought ‘out of time’ if The Appellant had a mental disability at the time the new Claim accrued.

19. As the Defendant, in recent years, persistently disseminates information about the Appellant, as being delusional, then that means the Appellant may apply to the Court to amend the Claims that accrued when he was delusional.

20. If the information, disseminated by the Defendant, is not true then that may be relevant exemplary and aggravated damages and even amount to defamation.

21. If the information that the Defendant disseminates about the Appellant, being delusional, is untrue then the Appellant asks that a statement is made as to when the Defendant will stop disseminating this untrue defamatory information and how it will go about achieving that as well as the Defendants withdrawing what they have sent to many other public bodies, including the Metropolitan Police, the Guernsey police, the French police and even government departments in the royal courts of Justice and Whitehall from around 2002 and onwards when applications were made that the Appellant be registered a Vexatious Litigant and as a MAPPA level 3 victim.

22. If, on the other hand, the information they disseminate about the Appellant is true then that requires the Defendant to say as from what date he is delusional or with a mental disability as the Appellant can be allowed by the Court to amend any claim that accrued from that date when he first had a mental disability.

23. As we are aware much by the Claimant is in writing and so if the Defendant gives detail as to the Appellant being delusional, for just one moment, then an independent expert can be used to trace back the detail from that moment identified by the Defendant to where the indication of delusional in writings first emerged.

24. A critical detail is that the Defendant actually disseminates information to say that the appellant is delusional for ‘thinking he is harassed by police’.

25. The Appellant complains to police, at least, as from 20^th June 1993, when the appellant was in unlawful custody, up an including to today’s Position Statement.

26. Given the Defendant disseminates information that the Appellant is delusional, for thinking he is harassed by police, please would the Defendant clarify at what point the Appellant was first displaying being delusional, by complaining he was harassed by police, so that the Appellant can apply to amend his Claims that accrued on or after that date.

27. If the Appellant was not delusional about being harassed by police, yet wrote and complained that he was harassed by police from say, 20^th June 1993, following information given to the Defendant by the Guernsey Police, at what point will the Defendant ensure the appellant is no longer harassed by police, such as the Defendant stopping disseminating false and malicious information about the Appellant and will the Defendant comment on the obvious reluctance of the Defendant to stop harassing the Appellant in the context of exemplary and/or aggravated damages

A)      Witnesses outstanding in 1-3 Action

1.       Ex Inspector Colliandris (medical argument irrelevant)

2.       Ex Chief Inspector Sean (Shawn) Trigg (key player)

3.       Ex Brian Jenner (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

4.        Ex Chief Inspector Insp Robert Nelson Roe (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

5.        Ex Chief Inspector Collin Jones (key player)

6.        Inspector Andrew Rice (Recall re 1^st Action 8.23 & CP Ebbs/Alexander)

7.        Inspector Steve Parry (Penal order on Defendant)

8.        Jonathan Clayton Air Traffic Controller (Dangerous flying/Penal Order)

9.        Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding (Defendant)

10.      Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian (Penal Order on Defendant)

11.      Ex Special Constable Ridley (Penal Order on Defendant)

12.       Mrs Diana Graham (Foreign Witness Summons)

13.       A Gafael (re break-in Cardiff Vet surgery/Penal Order)

14.       G Thomas (stolen BMW m/c/ Penal order)

15.       ‘Yosser’ Nigel Thomas (stolen BMW m/c)

16.       Michael Murphy (Defendant’s destruction of Claimant’s vehicles)

19.      Mrs J Hanson

B)    Application for Jury Trials for:

a)     4^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

b)    5^th Action Machine gun Case/malicious pros, false imprisonments

c)     6^th Action Forensic Psychiatrist/NHS (Wales) incorrect Medical Records

     d)     7^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

     e)     8^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

C)    Claimant’s Fitness to Continue?

D)   Previous ‘struck out’ incidents in 1-3 Actions to be re instated

E)     Current Civil Proceedings (post Woolf/ Human Rights Act)

F) HM Crown Prosecution Service continues to ignore disclosure applications from Claimant, his solicitor or from his barrister re:

              i) Refusal to disclose evidence to clarify NHS psychiatric records at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend

             ii)  Refusal to disclose July 2012 evidence re doctor's statement that caused Claimant imprisoned

            iii) Refusal to disclose depositions re above withdrawn indictment of 'harassment'

          iv) Refusal to disclose depositions re one Lewis machine gun indictment and subsequent acquittal

           v) Refusal to supply Claimant with copy of his own MG11 victim statement re above outstanding issues

            vi) Refusal to supply Claimant with date he was first deemed to have a mental disability

G)     Interim payment for costs and damage

Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                                                28^th May 2013

PILOT MAGAZINE....previous pages at bottom of previous blogs

Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (4).pdf

POLICE APPLICATION for POLICE CUSTODY VIDEOS TO BE BLOCKED from His Honour Judge Seys Lewellin QC on 3rd April

Maurice — Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:29:00 GMT

Witnesses for Week 4 Cardiff Civil Justice Centre 3rd April 13 10.30

STOP PRESS

Queens Council for the Chief Constable of the South Wales Police will apply on Wednesday, 3rd April, to block this video from being shown to the trial judge, His Honour Judge Seys Lewellin QC, EXACTLY as they succeeded in doing at my original 2000 magistrates, 2001 appeal and three JR applications after these same police, an Inspector Collins reported the driving conviction that the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons relied upon to have my name removed from the veterinary register , effectively , for life!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=4

Adrian Oliver.

15:11 (1 hour ago)

Dear Mr Kirk,

I refer to your further attendance at our offices on Thursday 28 March 2013, when you again sought to ignore the fact that we have withdrawn your licence to attend at our offices. I am given to understand that you caused disruption and inconvenience to other users of the building which we occupy and that the security staff at the building considered it necessary to communicate with the police in this regard. I would again urge you to deal with any necessary matters in compliance with the court orders which have been made in this matter.

I would also wish to record that you were not prepared to identify the basis of your attendance with the staff who sought to speak with you.

I refer to your telephone contact with Dolmans at 1.30 pm on 2 April 2013. I would again remind you of my prior request that you deal with matters by email due to your propensity to distort comments made in telephone discussion. You have been able to communicate by email and indeed, have sought to encourage the same. I record that it is only during the course of the adjournment of your civil trial that you have sought again to attend our premises and to communicate by telephone, even though you have been prepared to communicate previously by email. I would again ask you to revert to dealing with matters through this medium as it enables both parties to prepare for matters arising in the trial.

You have left a message at 1.30 pm asking for details of the witnesses who are to be called tomorrow (3 April 2013) for trial. You can be advised that it is the intention of Leading Counsel to invite former police officer Robert Osbourne to provide evidence at court on 3 April 2013.

I can also advise you however that Mr Lloyd Williams QC intends to address the court before any further evidence has been provided as to your failure to deal with the disclosure of any videos / digital footage which you might have in your possession.

I trust this email will provide you with sufficient notice to prepare for these matters.

Yours sincerely,

Adrian P. Oliver

Senior Partner

Dolmans Solicitors

SWP Schedule Defendant witnesses 4th week.pdf

SWP Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirk final.pdf

Dear Poorly Informed Tax Payer,

GUERNSEY, Channel Islands, is where I set up a ‘legal aid’ charity and first learnt to 'cut my teeth' on the current subject now unfolding at last, after twenty years, in Cardiff's Civil Justice Centre. It is HM Partnership's 'cosy relationship' as Lord George Foulkes once put it, the ‘incestuous relationship’ between both executive and judiciary, all protected within it by 'Royal Charters'.

.The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon's immunity to prosecution is the classic example when still refusing to ‘convene a court’, contrary to statute, simply to consider my numerous applications, over the last nine years, for my name to be returned to the veterinary register. [See the past twelve years of ‘Down Loads’ and other ‘Blogs’ on this website].

Here, in 'Old South Wales', as dentist John Wilson in 'New South Wales' will quickly concur, 'Her Majesty's Prerogative' continues to allow rampant nefarious conduct in our UK law courts to flourish, compounded by outdated 'adversarial systems' once based on trust.

Take the ‘Musa Family Case’, as another typical example, currently on appeal, ‘we think’, where Haringey Council lawyers ‘cashed in’ on the act, again all immune to any HM regulatory retribution or HM prosecution in either our civil or criminal courts.

[The Nigerian couple are currently serving seven years imprisonment with all seven of their children now snatched and outrageously ‘re homed’ instead of just being put on the next flight to Nigeria].

The paranoia surrounding this tragic case was further revealed in the way I was jailed for ‘attempting’ to fly the kids home in my two seat WW2 Piper Cub and then being prosecuted, in my absence, as Cardiff’s judiciary would not even ‘produce’ me from similarly outdated prison system! .This old ‘Out of Court’ video, below, has been held back until now to be a stark warning of things yet to come both in England and Wales, if not already here.

Does it stink or does it stink?

EXPOSURE VIDEO of GUERNSEY, as an IRA safe house, drug dealer's dream, insider dealer's paradise and where the incestuous island's De Vic Cary's grand father collaborated, as Bailiff, with the Germans, enough for Churchill intending to have him hanged, was the same little b+stard who jailed me 21 times, anything to prevent education on 'basic human rights' to be intoduced to a two teir structure his masonic mates and the serfs.

http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM

http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx

While in Wales,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y

We still have a Dr Tegwyn Williams 'at large', on 'long term sick with his wife,' on my account, despite falsifying yet further 'victim' statements

11 11 15 Solicitor letter to Cardiff Magistrates.pdf

12 08 20 MJK MG11 Redacted shr.pdf

Much more about NHS (Wales) multi million conspiracy, later.

In Cardiff County Court this Month

Lantwit Major's police sergeant Kilberg, one of many in the 1990s police force, who had my name removed from the veterinary register is caught out lying to the currently presiding judgere along with a few others already heard and shortly to also give evidence.

Enclosed is a 90s Barry police station custody video of Kilberg lying to the custody sergeant that I was in breach of a public order offence despite the custody sergeant specifically asking for that clarification.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellin QC or the police QC, during the three months civil action currently in session in the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, asked for clarification on exactly the same point with the South Wales Police sergeant qualifying the issue by stating the custody sergeant made the mistake when writing down the facts.

The truth of the matter was his partner, PC Gareth Holmes was right there, seen on video and refusing to support the deliberate lie either by recording it in his pocket note book or in his subsequent MG 11 witness statement.

Llantwit Major's Police Sergeant Kilberg Video to follow

http://youtu.be/eBkNCYYfJOE

Meanwhile a letter of more importance, if 'testicles on a plate without an anaesthetic' is to be avoided, to the only others in Wales, apparently, responsible for maintaining law and order throughout The Principality........

13 03 31 to CPS NHS.doc

AND this latest thoroughly insulting bit of nonsense from Cardiff's magistrates, court concerning the police refusing to return some £10,000 worth of antique guns and a walking stick confiscated in 2009/10 while desperate to get me a 10 year mandatory prison sentace for 'trading in prohibited weapons '!

Such as the WW1 Lewis machine gun, the most effective such weapon in the war and was bolted to my, now sold, replica DH2 RFC biplane fighter, an aircraft, like the September 1940 Hurricane, that turned the tables in 1916, just at such acute points in two world wars.....b*stards

13 03 28 Shot Guns and Muskets MagistratesCase Stated Response.pdf

ARE WE DEALING WITH EVIL HERE?

Masonic Devil Worship?

Dolmans, Cardiff solicitors,

You either settle or or I publish ex Chief Inspector' Jenner and ex Ely police station's Inspector Roe's recorded evidence denying , as did the b*tch of bitches, Barbara Wilding, by sworn affidavit, denying the knowledge of court cases and her ordering the use of a sledge hammer and a crow bar to break into my Cardiff veterinary surgery just to put back Jenner's daughter, Alison, effectively putting trouble and druggies back into my overhead flat .

Your client also had me put in Cardiif prison, for four days, pretending you vermin could not 'recognise' me!

Your client had the machine gun painted a different colour to try and fool a Cardiff jury

Your client had me up for speeding when in possession of the photograph of the true driver, his name adress and when I arrested CPS lawyer Stoffa the police ran a mile , in the wrong direction

Your client repeatedly had me arrested on the road side following a purported positive breath test only for there to be a zero reading within 20 minutes on the police stations' ' definitive test' machine.......any filthy trick to aggrevate and proke a victim.

Do I appear drunk in this Bridgend police custody video? This was immediately after 10pm arrest at Pencoed but almost negative reading on the station definitive machine (a lager or two at lunch time). The arrest was for for 'dangerous driving', that the south Wales Police lost, before a jury, after the judge had to stop the Cardiff trial for jury complaining the police were signalling to their mates onwhilst under my cross examination.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzSPSX-hVEE.

Your client, in 'Operation Orchid' tried to snatch our then ten year old child, using social services, bullying my then wife to signed a pre prepared witness statement that I was insane.......you evil bunch of lawyers conspired with NHS' Morgan Cole, solicitors to use Dr williams to have me arrested by armed police helicopter but failing to get a conviction or steel our daughter but instigated immediate divorce proceedings ....the thought of spineless tactics I should of expected

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JdcyhiC3e0&list=PL0A52598AD5E0C099

As lawyers you advised Barbara Wilding to have me registered MAPPA level 3

Your client, with your advise, then had Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams of Caswell clinic, to have me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act without a shred of evidence and without even examining his patient, for one purpose.....to delay this three month trial ever coming to court!

Oh, yes and what is the latest? Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams falsifies another police victim statement, in july last year, having me locked up for weeks in prison until the CPS then get involved to prepare for another rigged Cardiff judiciary jury trial.

And what did the CPS find? Dr Williams' circa 21st July 13 'victim' statement record? I had been around to his home and had harassed both he and his wife, Dr Janis Hillier causing the police to 'move me on'...utter bollocks,,,I do not even know or wish to know, other than to arrange a private prosecution 'procedure'as to where the fat over paid 'toad' lives.

Oh yes, I almost forgot....four times I have been to the police stations to complain and written long statements but your client, you advise them, ignore him , he will not live much longer.

Two sets of lawyers, one from England and one from Cardiff, have asked both the police and the CPS for a copy of that July 13 victim statement but they both reply....."it cannot be found"

Just for starters...... and we now move into two months of more fun or is it Romans chapter 12, verse19, is it?

Why is your client continuing to ignore the seriousnes of Christopher Alexander's (alias Ebbs). statement of yet anopther south wales Police conspiracy?....Worried it might be true? But you lot can continue to steal another huge chunk of tax payers' hard earned cash if you 'string it along' just like my seven or so listed Actions against your client. Remember, police officer Rice told the court he had no knowledge of Ebbs/Alexander or recognise him standing at the back of the court.

12 10 26 Ebbs Staterment.pdf

Your clients' collusion with Cardiff masonic devil worshiping judges had my web site closed down, last time, when we got a little too close to the truth about your disgusting money making regime but try it again and the articles will spring up on 10 other already primed web sites positioned abroad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0gQc1mveKg

Your client ran to the protection of Judge Nicholarse Cooke QC and got it following His Honour's receipt of the following 'jury note' of a flagrant conspiracy by the South Wales Police caught red handed' by the jury!!! That aborted 'dangerous driving' case must be heard also in the next few days, I presume?

Punitive Damages

Punitive DamagesInEnglandand Wales, exemplary damages are limited to the circumstances set out by Lord Devlin in the leading case of Rookes v Barnard:

Oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional actions by the servants of government.
Where the defendant's conduct was 'calculated' to make a profit for himself.
Where a statute expressly authorises the same.

Rookes v Barnard has been much criticised and has not been followed in Canada or Australiaor by the Privy Council.^[7]

Another case that could arguably be seen as an example of punitive damageswas that of Attorney-General v Blakein which the defendant profited from publishing a book detailing his work for MI5. The details were very old and therefore did not cause loss to the state. The publishing was, however, in breach of the contract of employment (and incidentally criminallyin breach of the Official Secrets Act 1911). The defendant was required to give an account of his profits gained from writing the book.

Thecourts have been very reluctant to follow this approach,^[9]emphasising the materiality of the criminalelement required for these damagesto be considered.

2) aggravated damages

"Aggravated damages are compensatory in nature, while punitive damages are awarded as punishment for egregious conduct....

NHS Doctor Faces Million Pound Damages re my Sectioned in France WANTED 3 Month P/A + MINDER 24/7 tel 07907937953

Maurice — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:07:00 GMT

"We Will GetThe B******d"
See overhead video

http://www.youtube.com/user/kirkflyingvet

DAMAGES THREE MONTH TRIAL STARTS 18th Feb13 @ Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/

JERSEY 26th January Video Interview re South Wales Police

and NHS (Wales) Conspiracy to have me Jailed in France

http://www.youtube.com/user/tomgruchy

‘Frustrated Maurice’

I am sending to the Crown Prosecution Service (London) samples of tape recordings, similar to those on my website blog, of Cardiff Magistrates original 1^st December 2011 conviction for ‘harassing’ the Caswell Clinic doctor. He had, without appropriate medical qualifications, recommended I be sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act and to be incarcerated, as a MAPPA Level 3 registered victim, without my knowledge, to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, most like likely for life.

The Cardiff CPS had told the 2^nd December 2009 judge, caught on transcript, that this doctor, all on his own, had further stated I that I had both irreversible and significant brain damage causing me to be categorised as being one of the UK’s 5% most dangerous individuals.

Cardiff Crown Court refuse to allow me to hear the CD record of the redacted 2^nd December 2009, 1^st and 2^nd March 12 Crown Court , the appeal from the original 1^st December 2011 District Judge John Charles , Cardiff Magistrates’ ‘harassment’ conviction hearing or that of the 2^nd May 12 Trial by Jury, the subject now before the Royal Courts of Justice, a breach of a restraining order never ‘served’ on me in the first place!

1. Did you receive Cardiff Court instructions, as I am given to believe, that on each occasion the respective Cardiff judges, His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, HHJ Hughes and HHJ Curran QC, that one or all three had your original transcribed records changed?

2. If so, which ones and what were changed?

3. Will you send me copy of the redacted portions in order to avoid a ‘class action’ in an English court against your employers?

I have spent thousands of pounds, over the years, on transcripts and ‘being corrupted’ has been the usual court clerk’s excuse for my not receiving the expensive full transcripts and significantly at variance to those of my own record of court proceedings in both Crown an Royal Courts of Justice courts.

The doctor had originally, on 7th August 2009, without even examining me, successfully applied to having me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act as having a ‘paranoid delusional disorder,’ having a fixed false belief unameanable to reason, in that I believed I was being persecuted by the South Wales Police and its Cardiff judiciary.

The omitted oral evidence, recording I was not allowed to have my legal papers, give evidence or call witnesses, some waiting in the building, is urgently needed for my appeal listed before the Criminal Court of Appeal.

Thankyou.

http://www.youtube.com/user/tomgruchy

11 11 15 CourtRoom1of3.wma

Tomorrow at 10am at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, disguised as a Kirk v Kirk divorce proceedings, a huge team of local lawyers and judges will commence the next stage in obtaining my my bankruptcy.

Why?

For the sole purpose of stopping my three month trial damages claim, due on 18th February, from even starting. The Breton affair is an indication, the machine gun and MAPPA registration in order to having me short ave all miserably failed.

The falsification of family property by chosen taffia is the least I expected in tomorrow's proceedings

I will be asking for a Mackenzie Friend and the tape recording of it under MY Control and AOLL CASES should be heard OUTSIDE WALES' den of iniquity

Cardiff Crown Court continues, of course, to refuse to let me listen to the 4th May13 jury trial conspiracy, originally hatched by a string of 9 Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, barristers, back in the 90s, in a ring with key police officers to have my name removed from the veterinary register.

The trail judge was a party to criminal proceedings culminating in police asking the RCVS to have me struck off.

Back in the 2000s 9, Park Place chambers, barristers were caught in a lucrative ring reliant on prisoners in Cardiff police cells being charged, using the same defence teams, back hander to the duty sergeant, to dictate the poor sod's fate.

Cardiff judges, often from those chambers are known to visit the juries, during their private deliberations, stating whether they should bring a 'Guilty' plea or not

It stinks, doesnt it?

Not a patch of what will leak out of their manure heap tomorrow and the following day.

13 02 03 REDACTED Criminal Court of Appeal ref.doc

13 01 29 Prosecution Witnesses PART ONE requiring witness summonses.doc

13 01 31 PART 2 MJK Prosecution Witness List.doc

Oh , I almost forgot..guess where the 4th May 13 CPS barrister came from? and the original one at 1st Dec 12 magistrates harassment conviction ,caught red handed on somebodies recording device....eg caught switching cocked up exhibits etc etc, mid trial expecting me not to notice , in custody behind bullet proof glass, refused legal papers from my cell or lawyer or my lawyer's brief, my own witnesses or right to cross examine the rogue police doctor? And in tomorrow's bit of skullduggery guess which cambers Lisa Thomas comes from??

VN850036.WMA this man talking to District Judge John Charles, wash your mouth out, Maurice

I am being pushed by all this in publishing further Cardiff tapes

https://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=you+tube+maurice+kirk&oq=you+tube+maurice+kirk&gs_l=hp.12..0i8i13i30.8355.14767.0.19394.21.21.0.0.0.0.863.5566.0j11j6j1j0j2j1.21.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.2.hp.pkPW1JFKNGA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.41934586,d.d2k&fp=32705b7f4f76e02c&biw=1093&bih=490

http://www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk/

27th Jan 13 LETTER to His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

re Wide Spread Corruption in Cardiff Courts

13 01 27 SWP Dr MJK to Morgan Cole HHJ SL.doc

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

Within 30 minutes of speaking with NHS (Wales) rogue lawers while having lunch he is surrounded in his Merdrignac Breton main street and bungled into a 'pannier a salad' and driven to Pontivy Hospital for psycho analysis.

Coincides in just days of GMC conclusion on Caswell Clinic doctor, IPCC machine gun and South Wales Police and CPS re appeals in London, all effeffectively, arriving 'all together'......to further substantiate a South Wales taffia conspiracy to pervert the course of justice

By EYE WITNESS

STATEMENT OF EVENTS ON THE 24/01/2013

IN THE VILLAGE OF MERDRIGNAC FRANCE

After having lunch at a cafe Maurice kirk and myself walked to another cafe for coffee ,where we made a video involving an old gentleman and his opinion of the UK in Europe.

Having left there at approximately 1.30pm we then walked to a butcher shop, purchased some pate and then carried on to the council office, after this we proceeded to the police station.

Whilst and the police office Maurice tried to explain that the squatters in one of his properties had destroyed some valuable antiques for fire wood to which the police started to laugh and treat Mr Kirk with from my opinion great disrespect.

The police then insisted that they could not understand or speak any English and refused to take Mr Kirk's complaint. Mr Kirk then proceeded to become agitated with his treatment and shouted at then calling them Nazi bastards to which I heard laughter, at this point I suggest to morris it would be wise to leave which we did.

We had walked out of the police station past the butchers when I notice the two young officers who laughed at Mr Kirk in the first instance running down the road past us and pointed this to Maurice, Maurice was involved in a conversation with a local at this time.

I started to walk towards the car and spoke to the ethnic police officer as he ask where we were parked, at this point Maurice came around the corner and told me not to speak with them which I did. The police attention then focused on Maurice and several officers were present, two young ones and two older ones.

Maurice was then marched back to the station with an officer on each arm.

Whilst Maurice was being processed an officer approached me and asked what the problem was in English and I explained the whole situation regarding the squatters and the damage that had been done, I then asked why they did not help Mr Kirk resolve this situation and was informed that the police didn't have the man power due to cuts and that Maurice was a well known crazy man that will be sent to an asylum .

I explained we had a booked ferry and that surely they could overlook this and try to understand his point of view but he insisted that he would have Maurice taken to a Hospital to be sent to an asylum.

I then left for St Malo.

27/01/2013

MORE PHOTOS LATER

I was locked up for a while and then taken to Pontivy hospital, central Brittany about 30 miles away.

The police tried to persuade the doctors, three of them, to admit me as a mental patient.

After 30 minutes or so more nurses arrived and one said,

It's the ‘flying vet' he was here to have a hip replacement, insisted he could fish from his room in the river below! ......he crept out far too soon after the operation on his crutches, in his pyjamas and flagged down a taxi and went off to the horse races!

What is he in here for?

Police said, to have him sectioned and sent to an asylum.

A huge amount of laughter followed with comments like, " You will have a job sectioning Maurice, he had the doctor (Dr Maimar?) in fits of laughter with his stories of flying old French wooden aircraft, with out paperwork, out of Pontivy across the channel, some 30 years ago.

I was then forcefully dumped in police vehicle driven back to Merdrignac where I was locked up until 9 am next morning.... Showed with questions, refused any paperwork (South Wales Police style) and kicked out.

The three month trial is booked Feb 18^th but with crutial hearing on Wed 30^th Jan for the issuing of 60 odd witness summonses on top of their 70 or so police defending/ including Barbara Wilding and rogue psychiatrist I am not allowed to name.

Interesting, this is the fourth or fifth time booked to start in past 12 years only for myto be mysteriously locked in prison each time just weeks before the trial is due to start.

‘machine gun ‘ 2009 trial

breach of Dr restraining order 2012

now this

Interesting, a solicitor, purportedly helping me......disappears off the map for weeks before Christmas. And now 15 e-mails all at once with clear indication my Tues 28^th Jan divorce case, machine gun case, rogue NHS psychiatrist (both one million pound claims) are being discussed with him with kept entirely in the dark with all parties ignoring my e-mails phone calls etc etc

It stinks , doesn't it?

WHAT IS GOING ON?

26th January 2013

I visit my ex wife's divorce lawyers to try and settle some issues on valuations etc to simplify court hearing tomorrow.

No chance!!!

I therefore send a missive to an intersted party at short notice:

27th Jan 2013

-- I have only recieved your e-mail this week end, to read, due to squatters getting into our second home, St Doha France and my being sectioned under the French Mental Health Act regulations just 30 miinutes after talking to Morgan Cole, solicitors, re 30th Jan 13 Cardiff County Court hearings re machine gun scandal, before the imminent three month trial judge to apply for witness summonses to be issued.

Clearly, the age old based conspiracy, between barristers in 9 Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, specific senior police in area police stations, certain law firms in Cardiff and judges serving both in the civil and/or criminal Cardiff courts means new evidencew has come to light re the police forensic Caswell Clinic psychiatrist, Barbara Wilding and abuse surrounding my MAPPA level 3 registration and police repainted Lewis Machine Gun.

This, together with serious valuation irregularities having been commented upon in my divorce hearing, due tomorrow, by the case mangement judge, means that there are still further reasons why I need, in the interests of fair play, for all my cases being moved out of South Wales.

My latest blog on www.kirkflyingvet.com gives a hurried account of just how far the evilness I have witnessed , over the past twenty years, in Cardiff police stations, courts and prison, of the accepted nafarious practises by so many and now protecting a rogue doctor but only because he is in the pockets of the notorious South Wales Police.

I do not wish your attendance at court, tomorrow, if that is your intention, at such lateness and not even properly briefed.

Thankyou

MJK

HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC appears to be refusing, on 30th Jan, key witnesses in the February three month trial including, can you believe it, the 'Defendant', Barbara Wilding and her pet MAPPA forensic psychiatrist, the Clinical Director of Caswell Clinic, one time, now blaming me for him and his wife, Dr Janis Hilliear both being on the 'long term sick'!

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

South Wales Police now join the Trial Judge , it appears, to block MAPPA boss, Barbara Wilding and Caswell Clinic doctor, from giving evidence in 20 Year Running Police Bullying Case, all of us in court this Wenesday.....ALL INVITED

http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#inbox/139acf07d44503ab

Police Application to Block MAPP/ Machine Gun/ Barbara Wilding/ NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic Rogue doctor ( on the 'permanent sick' with his wife, Dr Janis Hillier, also of Caswell Clinic........blaming me for my harassment!

13 01 28 SWP.pdf

http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/13c8319c570ea450

£10,000 Reward for Witnesses re Cardiff Cabal Shredding Still More Evidence of their 20 Year Conspiracy

Maurice — Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:02:00 GMT

Best summed up in latest Cardiff court conduct, yesterday when I had to call the police to Cardiff Magistrates building to try and prevent the cabal from shredding still further documents all of which should have gone before the May 'Breach of a Restraining Order' jury.

I visit again, today or tomorrow and will refuse to leave the public counter, this time, until Mr Morgan or who ever opens the the sealed up 'brown envelope' contained in the file marked 14th November 11, by coincidence the day before the part heard hearing that led to my 1st December 12 conviction of 18 week imprisonment.

The sealed up 'brown envelope' orders from the Recorder of Cardiff, it states, was only to be opened when I was sentanced....clearly indicating still further conspiracy.

I have spent moths trying to get that Judge Christopher Llewellyn Jones Court Order from both Crown Court, the manager saying she cannot find it while at the magistrates, along with Cardiff Crown, have written saying I am not entitled to court logs !

Makes a complete nonsence following the nod and wink from the very Crown Court to which I then appealed on 1st March 12 with the envelope and advice confirming the higher Cardiff courts backing of my not being allowed to cross examine the doctor or call contrary medical evidence from doctors in rebuttal, have my legal papers in court or produce my own evidence.

But, then, what is new under the Cardiff sun?

I will publish all this, shortly, off a hurriedly made photo of one late disclosed page of court log, previously refused in writing and now far to late for last few weeks of JR applications before Mr Justice Beatson, Singh J et al

meantime

12 07 31 Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal Court of Appeal re1.pdf

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Evil-Cardiff-Magistrates.aspx

So I write yet another, possibly, futile letter to England remembering only too well as the cover-up at Swansea Crown Court recently procured when South Wales Police were protected from their conspiracy exposure over the false imprisonments in the Lynette White murder here in Cardiff.

The following witnesses had others with them at the scene of some hundred or so police incidents where I often expereinced extreme police bullying lleading to malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments in order to have my name removed from the veterinary register

Up to £10,000 reward, per individual, is offered for to any one assisting in my tracing the where abouts of known and yet unknown witnesses, to obtain evidence for the forth coming 10 week trial. Many witnessed road side , police station and court incidents needed for my prosecdution of the case. Do you know any one? Thankyou

List of Ex Chief Constable's and current Chief Constable's defence witnesses

MAURICE JOHN KIRK V SOUTH WALES POLICE

ALPHABETICAL LIST OF WITNESSES

	Name
1	Dr Baig
2	PC 2866 Clive Barber
3	PC 322 David Barrett
4	PC 3200 Richard Bassett
5	PS 1625 Claire Baxter-Jones (now Lamerton)
6	PS 3174 Philip Beer
7	PC 644 Roger Bickerstaff
8	DS 3849 Abigail Biddle
9	DI 3074 Gary Bohun
10	PS 2602 Stephen Booker
11	PC 620 Peter Bowers
12	PC 1444 Philip Bracegirdle
13	PS 4008 Linda Canterbury
14	PS 3619 Mark Cocksey
15	Dr Coleman
16	PC 1417 Steven Coles
17	Inspector 2947 Geoffrey Coliandris
18	PC 2981 Richard Collins
19	PS 594 Dennis Crutcher
20	DS 3120 Robert Davidson
21	Inspector 1909 Howard Davies
22	Vivienne Davies (deceased)
23	DCI 732 Simon Davies
24	PC 881 Vincent Donovan
25	PC 3126 Lee Driscoll
26	Inspector 1973 Steven Evans
27	CI 2282 Daryl Fahey
28	DS 1694 Dinlle Francis
29	Chief Inspector Brian Albert Genner
30	DS 3544 Michael George
31	DC 787 Philip Gibbs
32	PC 1008 David Giboney
33	PS 1301 Roy Goodman
34	INS 1385 David Greaves
35	DC 2784 David Griffiths
36	Civilian Dianne Griffiths
37	Inspector 913 Sydney Griffiths
38	PC 1696 Robert Guest
39	PC 3487 Robert Gunstone
40	T/C.I 3737 James Hall
41	PC 2 Gary Hayes
42	PC 122 Paul Hayes
43	PS 2483 Paul Ivor Hillman
44	PC 3438 Stephen Holehouse
45	PC 3546 Gareth Holmes
46	Inspector 2837 Timothy Hubbard
47	PS 202 Alexander Huckfield
48	PC 3583 Richard Humphreys
49	DC 1623 Martyn James
50	PC 972 Jonathan Johnson
51	Keith Jones
52	DI 2858 Eric Herbert Kendall
53	DS 1324 Julian Kerslake
54	PS 3444 Nicholas Kihlberg
55	PC 1289 John KirkPatrick
56	DS 4059 Jane Lott
57	Inspector 526 Jonathan Lott
58	PC 1532 Keith Lovell
59	Dr Lush
60	PC 301 Zachary Mader
61	Former PS 32 John Mahony
62	PC 808 John Manders
63	SPC 7781 Deryn Martin
64	INS 651 Paul McCarthy
65	DS 3432 Barrie McGregor
66	PC 1590 Robert Morgan
67	DC 673 Stephen Geoffrey Murphy
68	PC 1215 Robert Osbourne
69	PC 3202 Richard Paines
70	PS 2148 Huw Phillips
71	PS 2244 Raymond Pickett
72	DCI 1978 Stephen Robert Powell
73	PC 3689 Gareth Price
74	Clare Reohorn (now Willis)
75	PC 3983 Cheryl Rewbridge
76	Inspector 1581 Andrew John Rice
77	PS 2788 Geoffrey Roberts
78	PC 1953 William Glenville Roberts
79	PC 680 Andrew Roch
80	PC 3100 Roche
81	PS 1815 Robert Nelson Roe
82	520 Simon Rogers
83	PC 450 Tracey Ellen Selleck
84	Inspector 1419 David Smith
85	PC 389 Stephen Smith
86	PS 2727 Andrew Stephens
87	PC 1290 Michael Stone of Avon And Somerset Constabulary
88	PS 585 Nigel Streeter
89	PS 3052 Phillip Thomas
90	PS 1831 John Mark Uprichard
91	DC 2568 Jonathan Venners
92	PC 949 Pauline Walters of Gwent Police
93	PC 2398 Thomas Warren
94	PC 485 John Wellbeloved
95	PS 3227 Adrian Williams
96	PC 566 Robin Wilson
97	Delyth Hannah Woods
98	Deanna Linda Young

Page

more to follow shortly

Know a Rogue Doctor? £10,000 Reward for Witnesses make it £20,000

Maurice — Sun, 15 Jul 2012 21:27:00 GMT

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Know-a-Rogue-Doctor_3F00_.aspx

much more shortly

In the mean time:

Dolmans, solicitors
BS6141159‐MC 65

Cardiff
                                   CF204141, CF101741

                                                                       7CF07345, 8CF0226

‘Machine gun', MAPPA, Rogue Doctor and ‘Breach of Restraining Order' Damages Claims

Kirk v South Wales
Constabulary

13^th July 2012

Witnesses needed for
trial

Further to His Honour's direction
for me to consider your letters to me, 26^th March 10 and 24^th
February 10, admitting an incident and court cases, police breaking into my
surgery, denied by the Chief Constable in her affidavit, drafted by you and my
having to travel to an English court in order for Court Orders for disclosure
to be effective, it re opens the argument for the need for ‘consolidation' of
all cases and they be taken well outside Wales.

Your direct influence and involvement in continuing
nefarious conduct with the South Wales Police, scheming repeatedly to getting
me jailed, needs to put in the hands of The Director of Prosecutions.

Your ignoring the repeated Court
Orders to disclose your 20^th June 2009 Mr Nightingale police
complaint statement designed purely to have me jailed is replaced by the now bogus ‘restraining order', the latest parcel being passed around the incestuous
Welsh judiciary until the music stops.

I require the names of the other officers
involved, not just Sgt Roe that I had to supply you with, in the first place, some
eight or so years ago. It proves Inspector Griffiths, your investigator, a
liar and/or widespread cover ups within the South Wales Police Force.

I have a list of some of my
witnesses needed for evidence and refer my 6^th June 2009 incident schedule,
submitted about then listing my witnesses and the then known police present

To expedite matters I need to
know those police you are calling and the names and addresses of those,
relevant to each incident, you are not calling in order to complete my witness
list with the summary of evidence for each that have not or will not furnish me
with a witness statement

My £10,000 reward for witnesses
will again go up on websites in the hope retired police officers etc or their
neighbours come forward with names and addresses for the issuing of witness
summonses.

This mimics the situation no
different to that of 22^nd June 2009 when police Operations ‘Chalice,
and ‘Orchid' had me sectioned under the Mental Health Act and registered MAPPA
level 3 for jail.

Many Cardiff judges refused bail
due to this advertisement just to lock me up for many months

Yours,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/picture2588.aspx

Clerk of the Court

Criminal Court of Appeal Your Ref 2012 03241D2

Royal Courts of Justice

London

13^th July 2012

Regina v Maurice Kirk

Appeal from ‘Breach of Restraining Order' 9 Month Prison Sentence

Dear Sir,

This case of breaching of a restraining order was quite unknown to me, at the time, as no such document was ever tendered for agreement or given to me to sign.

The standard procedure in Cardiff, at least, is that in order to obtain release from the custody of the court the prisoner has to sign the ‘licence' relating to such conditions. As I was neither in court nor in the prison no such licence was procured and despite my numerous visits to the court building since, to establish the truth, there is serious indication the official restraining order may well not have been printed and or placed on the court record until the following day.

As I expected I found on the court copy of the official restraining order, during this week's twenty year running damages claim hearing for malicious prosecutions, duly signed over by the County Court clerk, following the orders of His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC to disclose it, a hand written note by someone unknown, dated 2^nd December 2011, the day after my alleged offence.

I have been refused proper disclosure of evidence before, during the jury trial and even now.

The Crown Prosecution admit no record was made of service in either the magistrates court log or that log held by the private custody firm, GEOamey. CCTV proof, filmed by different cameras under the control of different owners, either court or GEOamey, were ‘un available' for the jury.

I write because the CPS (Wales) and South Wales Police have now both been furnished with MG11 witness statements to support what actually went on in court when a draft was being hand written.

Both the police and CPS (Wales) are now refusing to take my complaint or take statements from eight more eye witnesses who were, both in and outside the court, on the day of the alleged offence. Five custody officers were present at the time of the alleged offence but I was denied their attendance to give evidence.

The excuse given is that sufficient evidence is before them but none of the witnesses that have visited Cardiff Central Police Station, so many times, are allowed copy of any of the information given and purported to have been given the CPS (Wales).

CPS (Wales) state that until I am granted ‘leave to appeal' they will not inform you of this important new evidence.

"What if I had not appealed as I have served the sentence?" resulted in silence on the phone.

"If I withdraw my appeal will the police then investigate further?" again, resulted in silence.

CPS staff then stated here in Cardiff we do nothing until the appeal papers are returned to them via their London office. Yet one more telephone call, my twentieth, this time to your office, confirmed my appeal was filed , case worker allocated and papers sent on to the CPS on the 1^st June 2012.

I apply to your court to order the release of Meirion Bowen's witness statement, details attached, he giving me written permission, as it is needed for a number of outstanding directly related matters with the Administrative Courts ( CO/3970/2012 and 6357/2012 and CO/ 4298/12011) and GMC, the earliest due to be heard on 24^th July 12 before Mr Justice Beatson in Cardiff as well as this Thursday's magistrates hearing, before district Judge Bodfan Jenkins, for the return of my shot guns and other weapons unlawfully confiscated whilst attempting to snatch my daughter during an armed police response with helicopter in ‘Operation Orchid'.

Thankyou

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Enclosed Merion Bowen's copy of permission original sent to CPS (Wales)

Copies to Cardiff Administration and Magistrates Courts

Will IPCC Investigate South Wales Police Conduct?

Maurice — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:26:00 GMT

01 06 018 SWP MG IPCC Conclusion.pdf

South Wales Police will not admit as to just which statement(s) of the targeted victim have been submitted to the Professional Standards Department!

My IPPC reply to 18^th June 12 South Wales Police Professional Standards Dept. refusals to properly investigate my many complaints arising from one decommissioned Lewis Machine Gun attached to my Farnborough DH2 WWI fighter display aircraft.

Web site photo off gallery of machine gun in capable hands:

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Machine-Gundog_2100_.aspx

1. The police letter exudes bias in many paragraphs and quite erroneous about their conduct.

2. The gun was used to prosecute me under Section 5(1)(a) of 1968 Fire Arms Act.

3. The gun was used to have me remanded in custody for nearly eight months.

4. Used to have me imprisoned under Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act.

5. Police have not even re interviewed the owners despite their new August 2011 statements!

South Wales Police accept in their original August 2009 gathered evidence that the new owner had painted the black gun to part silver immediately after their 2008 purchase from me.

The police then returned the gun, after my 2010 successful trial, even in a different shade of silver!

I had sold the gun as ‘all black' just as the gun was then presented in my 2010 jury trial and in my August 2008 U Tube video, also shown the jury, having been filmed an hour before it was collected.

The same video can be seen on www.kirkflyingvet.com as used by the police for the Cardiff trial.

6. The ‘investigation' was wholly disproportionate because:

a) I faced a minimum five year prison sentence on each of the remaining charges

b) I was registered MAPPA level 3 at level 3 management, meaning 24/7 armed surveillance

c) aided by their forensic psychiatrist, also using falsified evidence and quite unqualified medical reports, stating I had ‘significant brain damage' and possible brain tumour

d) allowed the police to ask His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, on 2^nd December 2009 (transcript available), I be further sectioned under the 1983 Act in order I be further incarcerated to Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital, IPP, meaning possibly for life

e) Inspector Richard Holder continues to refuse to let me finish or even give me copy of my part written signed witness statement, for the IPCC, I made in Cardiff prison on 7^th February 2012 in the presence of his colleague, Inspector King.

f) Aircraft mechanics, when I owned it, Civil Aviation Authority and Lincolnshire museum licenced mechanics, all state it was decommissioned and that the barrel was blocked.

7. The police admit firing the gun only after the new owner's August 09 statement that it was blocked when the police took possession of it on 22^nd June 2009, on the day of my arrest.

8. Since this IPCC inquiry started solicitors for the police have only, this month, now disclosed but only by a court order from an English court, all previous orders from Cardiff courts having been ignored, that my arrest had been instigated by Dolmans, solicitors, defending in a 20 year running civil damages claim for numerous other malicious and failed prosecutions.

09 06 20 SWP Dolmans MG 11.pdf

9. Since this IPCC complaint was registered I have established that seven MAPPA monthly meetings were only conducted within the knowledge of police and NHS (Wales) staff at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend. All documents proving these facts are available.

9 12 15 SWP MJK MAPPA Statement.pdf

10. A policy to ‘having me shot' was the only reason to delay my arrest for well over three weeks and is recorded in the leaked MAPPA minutes and original executive summaries of this conspiracy to again pervert the course of justice. 10 09 27 Medical MAPPA 4p.pdf

Under Cover Tactics

11. ‘Foxy' was the name given at the 2010 Cardiff Crown Court trial to the anonymous screened off male police officer I was denied, as with others, to properly cross examine.

He pretended to be the officer who telephoned each time when attempting to purchase the machine gun. He knew, full well, it had been advertised on my web site for almost ten years and had been sold a year earlier!

Female police communication to me included a telephone call to my then wife, Kirstie Kirk.

The police have not even interviewed Kirstie Kirk following my current allegations to the IPCC.

Police refused to disclose evidence recorded during her original interrogation, during ‘Operation Chalice', for the machine gun coinciding with ‘Operation Orchid', the latter being to coerce her into signing a witness statement that I had a history of mental health issues.

It was for the purpose of ‘snatching' our ten year old daughter on behalf of the Vale of Glamorgan Social Services following the 8^th June 2009 discussions at the clandestine MAPPA meeting at Barry police station with only police and Caswell Clinic staff in attendance.

MAPPA Status

12. The August 2010 MAPPA ‘Executive Summary', of the so far disclosed MAPPA meetings, was only written following my paid for application before His honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC. 10 12 3 MAPPA Executive Summary.pdf

13. As for the 8^th June 2009 minutes, leaked from Caswell Clinic, the document clearly indicates I would be shot should I again approach Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable, as I had done following her 26^th February 2009 now proven to be false sworn affidavit on disclosure.

14. Crown Prosecution Service advise was recorded in the minutes to the effect that my intentions to expedite the ‘mutual exchange' of witness statements, in the on-going civil trial, appeared legitimate. Dolmans, solicitors, it was disclosed, were giving contrary advice.

15. His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC's refusal to order further disclosure of the monthly minutes he confirmed only yesterday in that his responsibilities were only for the civil action.

16. My private prosecution applications, except via Bristol, in anticipation of the usual negative response by those ultimately responsible, have also been blocked in all the criminal courts.

Maurice Kirk BVSc 11^th July 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bSaihgLunRw#

An unfinished summary of how this South Wales Police conduct influenced Musa's Mackenzie Friend representation during 2011 Family courts12 07 12 Re Kirk v South Wales Police re Sept 11 unfinished.pdf

re their six snatched Nigerian children by Haringey Council with criminal convictions now under appeal

My UK mobile: 07907937953
My e-mail: maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Who in South Wales is the next target victim? Oh, it appears to be Manchester.....

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/picture2588.aspx

Parliamentary Inquiry into the Independent Police Complaints Commission

Tomorrow (18/7/12) sees the start of the Home Affairs Select Committee hearing into the future of this much maligned organisation. Called to give evidence is the new IPCC boss, Dame Anne Owers (i've heard good things about her from trusted sources), Doreen Lawrence (mother of Stephen Lawrence) and the Police Action Lawyers Group.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jul/15/police-accused-kidnap-private-prosecution

Now, both Cardif Crown and Cardiff Magistratef, of course, refuse to list my private prosecutions.

Even though the Bristol District Judge agreed my allegations were so serious ( rogue doctor falsifying my medical report and police re painting the machine gun with the hope of fooling the jury) they should be transferred to Cardiff Crown ( this was a year ago) the Cardiff judiciary is so incestously biased, because I do not have a Welsh accent, ignore all my letters to list the case.

Musa Trial Today but is Your Daughter now Safe Anywhere in UK?

Maurice — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:39:00 GMT

Go Petition summary by Sabine

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/the-secrecy-of-the-family-courts-should-be-lifted-now.html

So what made me focus on the Family Court system here in South Wales? Read on.........

South Wales Police launched 30+ men, many armed and with a helicopter, all at your expense just to snatch one ten year old child from our front garden on that sunny afternoon Sunday three years ago.

9 6 SWP Dolmans app re Wit exchange.pdf

9 6 22 SWP Machine gun Dolmans arrest.pdf

09 06 19 SWP Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirk final.pdf

BUT after three years of police CPS and Dolmans ignoring Cardiff Court Orders I finally get my 'hot and sweaty' on still more proof of the machine gun / false psychiatric reports conspiracy IPCC continue to ignore and this only came in last week because I repeated the application in Bristol Crown Court, in ENGLAND..... 09 06 20 SWP Dolmans MG 11.pdf, that their own solictors, Dolmans of Cardiff, gave advice relating to the FTAC/MAPPA conspiracy over an old WW1 Lewis Machine Gun, excellent for rabbiting, bolted on my aircaft in order to try and get me shot!

And who still dares say 'HM Partnership' is still not thriving in these evil Cardiff buildings?

Will your family be next?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y&noredirect=1

Three times in HM Cardiff Prison and three times, in row, assaulted by Prison Officer Myers, bigger than me, last time punching me in the face and stomach to then knocking me to the ground onto my had hip whilst returning to court in order to deny me my legal papers overnight.

12 06 25 SWP Prison assault reply_0001.pdf 12 04 16 HMP reply to MP.pdf & this grossly inaccurate HM letter 12 04 16 HMP reply to MP.pdf & refused bail application until a JR is file in court....outragios behavior 12 06 12 JR re refused bail applications.pdf & Harassment State a Case JR .....shortly

THIS E-MAIL just came my way but I do NOT vouch for all its content as, obviously, some of it was without my witnessing it as to what really happened.

However, much of it I KNOW IS TRUE and therefore allowed on this and my other sites of mine should the judges close it down , as they have done in the past..... Hi - we saw Chiwar yesterday and he said the following:

he was incensed that no statements, from those who had made them, went to the jury as the prosecution refused this and the judge backed it.

He also said Owusu's summing up statement was cut short by the judge - he had an 80 page statement and was given till 1 oclock to deliver it but was cut off at 12 oclock, thus not even finishing his summing up. Nobody ive spoken to has a good word to say about the defence team and i agree certain things shouldve been done properly wrongly.

Eg. - the witnesses. i know the 2 defence witnesses who spoke - Steve and Vicki. Steve is a pastor and came to 1 hearing as a supporter at Gee St. court last June which was a closed hearing and i saw him twice at the Musas W Green Rd home when i was there. He would pray with the Musas and they would get into it and begin dancing as he would speak in tongues for 10 mins whilst praying with the Musas which ive never seen before from a supposed Christian pastor. I asked him later was this healthy and a correct thing to do given the circumstances and he said whatever he was saying was good and was confusing the devil who had no idea what he was saying. I pointed out that nobody else did either - not even him and he said it was of no consequence as whatever he was saying was good and was Gods message and will that it be said.

Anyway Steve wouldve witnessed Chiwar + Gloria acting responsibly at all times with their children which i guess was the point of him being called at all.

Musa was incensed that the witnesses for the defence who did not give evidence or were not asked for statements to be shown were:
Maurice Kirk
Kay Young
Paul Randle=Jolliffe
Cecilia Gibson
Moji Word
any of the intimidated witnesses who were affected by H'gey because of having dealings with H'gey / Adesida, often having children removed/threatened to have that. Those i met and spoke with were:

Christine Danko, Janice, another Vicki, and 2 others i forget the names of. Gloria introduced me to these people last May and they all told outrageous tales.
Frank Gad
Janet Owugah
Peter Lee, from H'gey child services
Dr. Adesida
Rosita Moise H'gey solicitor
Joyce Agekyum sw H'gey
Annie Walker head sw H.gey
Sharon Fair
Alison Brooks

Karen who lived downstairs, to answer questioning about ****** being locked in the garden as it is alleged.

- thats 21 people off the tops of Chiwars and mine and Helens heads who couldve given something specific eg. Kays interraction with H'gey sw's who she threatened so much with her knowledge of the law etc. that they hounded her for months after, and H'gey + connected employees who needed questioning about their roles in it all, especially Agekyum and the rest of the H'gey lot mentioned. Chiwar said Moise the H'gey lawyer was responsible for writing the statements so as they would be legally sound especially in court and this needed to be brought out.

Musa mentioned about ketamine being put in a syringe. on the 28 june at st thomas's hospital. He knew it was that because he checked the discarded bottle after watching its contents - ketamine - being put in a syringe. I know a syringe with a liquid in was mentioned the other day. He asks was this given to the baby, and why was it set up in the 1st place and by whom, and hospital staff need to be asked about this.

An important point Chiwar mentioned was that even to date the contents of that 2000 page report that was handed to the defence team one morning early on in the trial still has not been properly discussed with the Musas - who still arent aware of some of its contents. Chiwar says a lot of the time Owusu doesnt see them before the days proceedings to discuss things, as theyre either late on getting to court or Owusu + co simply dont go to see them before the day starts. One dreads what else hasnt been discussed with the Musas thats been received by the defence team at the last minute. He thinks SERCO deliberatly bring them late for this reason + other reasons.

Chiwar says the their DNA test results was not shown to the jury and shouldve been but was refused by the CPS + judge + should be sent in at once also for the jury to see, and the 85 page statement Gloria made for the family court last November should be given to the jury.

Apparently at the prison Chiwar was told by other prisoners that a prisoner who goes by the name of "Floky" was putting it about that the Musas were involved in trafficking 15 children, plus their own. Chiwar assumes this guy is connected to H'gey in some form and trying to get Chiwar beaten. The warders apparently moved Chiwar for a short while for his own safety but now it is ok he says. If you recall the warders at Holloway were allegedly responsible Gloria says for putting it about that she was insane and dangerous and everyone should avouid her and not befriend her. Of course very soon people could see the opposite, and also when other inmates would be murdered by prison staff as happened to the prisoner - long story.

At the hospital on the 28 June Musa says no way was he gone longer than 30 mins when he left - if even that - and no way was he gone 3 hours till midday as they claim.

He says cctv footage stills from his flat in W Green rd werent shown which showed the place very habitable - the opposite to what the cps claim., and he says other photos werent shown to the jury either.

Chiwars says the judge was asked if he wanted to recuse himself but he refused and also refused getting a new jury for various reasons when asked by Owusu.

In reply to my earlier message Hi - the musa case - the prosecution has refused many witnesses giving evidence for musa and the judge is backing the prosecution so we are giving these 5/6 banned witnesses statements to the higher judge at the court on monday in writing and emailing them also to make sure the court and hopefully jury get them also Already owusu has asked the judge to recuse himself over things but he has refused also a new jury. If u can pls send ur witness statement so it can be given 1st thing monday a.m. to the chief judge lyons at the court along with other stuff then. Pls if u can send by email to me asap it can be printed off for monday - tks - {which i sent to those i had addresses of at the time}

*****replied:

I've already given my statement to the court and I believe it went to the jury but wasn't read out. It is now too late for any more statements as all the barristers have finished their cases and now it's just for the judge to sum up and send the jury out on Monday. So if they are convicted these new statements can go towards the appeal, especially if they add anything to the medical issues or are from people who knew the older 5 children. Pity these witnesses suddenly appearing after the trial is over! But actually, I think it will come out OK as Owusu did a magnificent job on Friday and it will be very hard for the jury to find the Musas guilty after what he said to them. Fingers crossed! B

I disagree its too late - the point of getting the statements from the people where possible and sending them to the court after speaking with Chiwar was so the jury could see them and it isnt too late as the trial isnt finished yet. Waiting to give the statements at an "appeal" i disagree with as these statements could add good factors to Musas case before the jury retire and waiting maybe a year - a year for the Musas in prison too - for an appeal is unacceptable in my opinion. I think they would drag an appeal date out so as the other children could be gone via adoption before an appeal hearing which would just add difficulties in sorting this entire child removal side of the case out.

Owusu may have done a "magnificent job" as is suggested but maybe being allowed to finish what he set out to do re: his summing up he mightve made an even better one, as well as doing other important things too, like discussing new bundles with the Musas amongst other things. After all, thats his job.

To my great sadness and frustration however im thinking now it is practically possible to get statements from those Chiwar wanted statements from to show to the jury by the time they could be delivered to judge Lyons on Monday morning as they simply will not be got and sent to Lyons in time, him being the head judge at Wood Green crown court. Obviously if they were given to Patrick they would be refused and i dont think theres any reason on earth why Lyons cant be given the statements except for the time limit - there is only a few hours to get them there physically in print on Monday morning. They could be sent by email of course but they need perhaps to be physically given to the court office so as Lyons can receive them and take action, so it fills me with sadness the negative option of perhaps showing these what might be important statements only at any "appeal hearing" in the distant future might be the only action taken for Chiwars request.

Anyhow if anybody can send their statement to me asap i will endeavour to email it to the court and send it 24 hour delivery on Monday morning so as the court + Lyons receives it on Tues hopefully which maybe wont be too late, or if anyone can think of a better alternative please let us know.

At the end of the day i think not having witnesses for the Musas, as good as Steve and Vicki are, is simply not good enough. The defence team are supposed to be doing the job of defending the Musas and surely witnesses are an important factor in their case.

Heather pointed out an expert toxicoligist shouldve been got as a witness by the defence, if possible. Only prosecution medical staff have been heard at all which is totally one-sided.

Also the person who was at the hospital on the 28 June - the person referred to as Gloria's "sister" when Gloria was asked who she was then by hospital or H'gey staff - shouldve given evidence as to what she heard and saw then - Chiwar maintains Gloria, for example, was not "laughing" at various times as was claimed and was was taking things with the seriousness they deserved throughout which this witness couldve confirmed.

Ian Josephs points out things that shouldve been done too that werent - like asking the children in a certain way if they were coerced into saying things, and asking in a certain way about the alleged abuse on ****** = to ****** herself and Denise Bassett - in the event the abuse wasnt mentioned at all in the trial.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y&noredirect=1

http://newafricanpress.com/2011/10/16/maurice-kirks-account-of-the-musas-family-saga/

http://www.facebook.com/maurice.kirk.16

http://therealipcc.wordpress.com/maurice-kirk/

How to complain about your GP South Wales lot refusinging me a NHS (Wales) brain scan to eventually gaol the b*****d

http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#search/no-reply%40wordpress.com/1317580a216caf24

Meanwhile all this takes its toll

12 06 18 Section 8 JR Application 18th June 2012.pdf

http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#search/no-reply%40wordpress.com/1317580a216caf24

And if the enemy wish to continue to cheat let us bring in the Big Guns

http://victims-unite.net/2012/06/28/international-three-day-fast-and-praying-for-the-musas-starting-today/