04 Latest News : South Wales Police, Caswell Clinic

Trial Judge Orders Release of South Wales Police Confidential MAPPA Minutes! Trouble Brewing?

Maurice Kirk — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:46:00 GMT

[Today's cockeyed court verdict on site tonight]

A huge police team of lawyers, today, respond by telling court and my supporters they have not even read them!

Am I to believe I live on some other planet or just crawled out from under a stone?

So is the judge expecting me to believe he is reading, tomorrow, before the 11am hearing continues, the original records?

Record of seven clandestine police meetings, first to get me arrested for trading in WWI antique Lewis machine guns and, once having me locked up in Cardiff prison, using a crooked doctor, a Dr. Tegwyn Williams of notorious Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, to fabricate reports, an excuse to stop the trial and apply to have me diverted to Ashworth high security prison, for life?

I really thought I was now off morphine and other such mind hallucinating drugs!

Dr Tegwyn Williams told countless Cardiff judges in 2009, I had ‘significant brain damage' and a possible brain tumour and was too dangerous to be released..

Interesting, he with no qualifications to do so, but no Welsh judge or Dr has ever bothered to tell me any of this, during my seven months incarceration in their Welsh hell hole, built purely to feed the 'Taffia gravy train'.

Dream on, boys and girls. I watched most days Dr Tegwyn Williams, in partnership with an NHS (Wales) administrator, quietly syphoning off appropriate Caswell Clinic patients to one of their very lucrative private clinics....all funded and paid for by the readers of this blog.

South Wales Police have a new problem now.. The trial judge is, simply, buggered.

By reading the forgeries tomorrow, he has to identify the authors of those who sat around the table in Barry police station on the 8^th June 2009, planning to having me shot. See this leaked report! E P stands for seasoned, no nonsence, Caswell Clinic social worker, Elizabeth Paul....seven more names of that frightening three month experience of mine, in Caswell Clinic, will trickle out on these blogs up to trial date when reach will receive a summonses to give evidence of what evilness they witnessed under Dr Tegwyn Williams

He also has to identify those at the remaining six meetings in Caswell Clinic, each month, all trying to thrash out another way, my now being in prison, of keeping me locked up, unconvicted, to screw up my prosecution of 10 years of extreme bullying by a police force that had clearly lost its head.

On the 17th Dec 2009, the last purported MAPPA meeting, someone removed my name from the register altogether! Tomorrow we might find out just who?

No one told me why I was no longer on MAPPA, just days before the farcical machine gun trial was due to start.....but 'truth will out'.

Tomorrow, at 11am in the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, the case continues and I suggest you should not miss it for ‘all the tea in China'.

The QC and solicitor, methinks, were lying today and should be arrested.

If the police do not now arrest Dr Tegwyn Williams the learned judge has new a very huge problem.

All welcome to witness!

Caswell Clinic staff, Barbara Wilding and Dr Tegwyn Williams etc will be among many new faces in the trial, all made to give evidence on oath. The trial is now listed in the New Year, which year is debatable, to last, they estimate, for only nine weeks.....just where do they dream up these porky pies?

Key prosecution witnesses, to confirm the extreme bullying by South Wales Polikce, have, after 19 years, just been located!

So boo to those who snear at the 'ram butting the dam'...today.there is a 'gurt' crack appearing.

Free candy floss and ice cream at the interval while the safety curtain comes down...

Just how Incestuous can this Cardiff Court get? QC, Solicitor or Judge to be Arrested on Monday? [Can o fwydod]

Maurice Kirk — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 08:46:00 GMT

On Monday, at 2pm, 11^th July, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre my machine gun/false psychiatric reports, damages claim starts, having been refused a jury or it being transferred to England. They are for South Wales Police's unlawful attempts to having me jailed my life, unconvicted and attempting to have my 10 year old daughter ‘taken into care' by the Welsh courts, NHS and Welsh Social Services.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC has already ‘struck out' an incident when police were caught on their own overhead road video [see website You Tube], beating me up in a Cardiff street and, later, in police cells and another incident he knows about, when the police withdrew reason for arrest aka ‘Breach of the Peace'. This judge ruled, "damages cannot be claimed against police if, after each incident complained of, you happen to pick up some criminal conviction, however trivial, whether related or not!"

This same judge, would you believe, has already refused to accept some 130 odd allegations, lost by the police, winning only around 12, is not an extreme example of police bullying !. He has ruled the first five Actions for damages will not be heard together, transfered to the High Court or will get a jury.

South Wales Police will be asking the same judge these latest damages claims, that caused me over seven months imprisonment, including three months of shear hell in Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison, must be adjourned for at least 5 years to allow the previous 5 Actions be heard, appealed and disposed of in their usual perfunctory way.

This Cardiff Cabal, of deceit and intrigue, have already managed to delay my 1st Action for damges for 19 years, my solicitor dying meantime, with key witnesses now either settled in old people's homes, senile or dead.

Come witness this judge block the recorded evidence of a criminal conspiracy by South Wales Police high ranking officers, in Barry police station and Caswell Clinic recorded in their own MAPPA minutes using the excuse it falls under PII, ie not in the public interest!

It stinks, doesnt it?

I am off the morphine so come witness real criminals being arrested, to eventually face private prosecutions by the people, their ‘Achilles Heel'.

Copy to HHJJ Seys Llewellyn 10^th July 2011

Dear Mr Oliver and His Honour Seys Llewellyn,

The Criminal Prosecution of Dr Tegwyn Williams and Merging all twenty years grievances into a case that Judges then approve to hear before a Jury in England

We refer to the letter 27 June 2011 regards case management hearing 11 & 12 July should not go ahead if the plan is to prevent fair trial, by not allowing access to justice of the opportunity to list all twenty years grievances into a case where selected issues of the twenty years can then go before a Court preferably before a jury.

We apologise to Mr Oliver for confusion in how the original transcript of letters (and specifically the letter 23 June 2001) on behalf of Mr Kirk are added to by many volunteers. I hope we can clarify as follows

Whereas Mr Kirk would know of grievance as to why private prosecutions could occur to many. To date, may be for reason of logistics, those of us who try to Mr Kirk write with more exactness, only have clear enough evidence ‘to immediately proceed' with a prosecution of a criminal case against Dr Tegwyn Williams, in England, if necessary.

It occurs to those of us who try to help Mr Kirk write in ways more suitable to helping the working of the Courts, that it is within Mr Oliver's responsibilities to his client SW Police that he would be eager to bring a criminal prosecution against Dr Tegwyn Williams, so as to distance SW Police from being tarnished by Dr Tegwyn Williams criminal conduct.

Given the basic evidence as below against Dr Tegwyn Williams is so very clear indeed, and obviously a very serious matter, if Police or their lawyers do not bring a prosecution against Dr Tegwyn Williams that leaves individuals in S.W. Police or individuals at their lawyers open to the charge of conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams. It is a clear enough case to be easily merit and be investigated by an outside police force.

I am sure a man of standing such as Mr Oliver would not wish the good name of his client SW Police or their lawyers be drawn into allowing credible allegations of criminal conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams. We therefore would like to hear from you as to how you propose to help facilitate a prosecution regards Dr Tegwyn Williams.

To clarify we remind that the clear criminal case against Dr Tegwyn Williams is that;-

Dr Tegwyn Williams wrote to and attended the Cardiff Crown Court, including on 2 December 2009, with information to substantially affect the outcome of the Crown Court and ways that could be expected to significantly contribute to losing Mr Kirk his liberty for life, by the single assertion that there was irreparable brain damage and possible brain tumour that affects behaviour.

Dr Tegwyn Williams must have known that Mr Kirk did not have brain damage (to affect behaviour) to merit indefinite loss of liberty.

Mr Kirk does not have brain damage from assessment in Wales, England and France

Dr Tegwyn Williams did not use anyone who is medically qualified to determine scans to say that Mr Kirk has ‘brain damage' and was not entitled to progress the view he did.

We ask you to receive this information with care and to be very clear, precise what you do with it and exactly who you pass it to at South Wales Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (Wales).

As stated, we feel that in such a clear case of wrongdoing by Dr Tegwyn Williams, anyone not acting to bring a prosecution when able to do so, may be obstructing justice or merit charges of being in a criminal conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams.

The outcome will also be added to the twenty years of events that we consider should go before a jury trial.

We look forward to hearing from your kind self with news of how Dr Tegwyn Williams criminal conduct is to be addressed.

Please would his Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn note that we feel the 'mindset' that may emerge from this letter can be so relevant to be ‘grounds to appeal' following the decision of HHJ Seys Llewellyn on 11 and 12 July 2011.

Because the ‘mindset' here can indicate whether there was substantial unfairness in previous cases, before His Honour Seys Llewellyn, to even justify changes to case law, we feel it should all be addressed.

We see grounds for using the EU Court of Human Rights limited on the kinds of such ‘very clear' issues as above.

Yours,

Mackenzie Friends from around the world

Another approach is this, below or anarchy, perhaps and we take to the streets not forgetting other methods, in reserve, to concentrate their evil little minds.

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre 11^th July 11 Hearing for MAPPA Disclosure and application to put off Machine Gun Damages Claim for Five Years

Kirk v South Wales Police    6 Actions for Damages

Kirk v NHS, Dr Tegwyn Williams, Professor Wood, HMP Prison Cardiff

Applications

1. A can of worms or a can of worms?

2. Last two years ‘mindset' of South Wales Police calls for the trial judge to re consider his 2010 judgments, currently subject to appeal.

3. Transfer all litigation to England

4. Transfer to High Court outside Wales

5. Consolidation of cases due to extreme and unusual case of blatant police bullying making previous case law, relied upon by Defence, as totally irrelevant.

6. Machine Gun case, falsified psychiatric reports and other failed 2010 police prosecutions, all for the Defendant to delay ongoing civil actions, should be given to an outside police force for a thorough independent criminal investigation.

•A.     HM Court Service (Wales)

1. HMCS refuse Claimant access to public counter

2. Communicate by e-mails

3. Make telephone calls for clarification

4. Allowed pay court fees by credit card over phone

5. Allowed to have affidavits sworn at court before a Court Order dead line

6. Conspired to prosecute common assault conviction (2^nd Nov 2010), ignoring medical evidence, HMCS not placing evidence before the District Judge

7. Court manager & HM Treasury Solicitor's ‘internal memos', circa 2003, re ‘Vexatious Litigant' registration, revealing miserable but expensive attempts over five years + and losing vital court files to block Claimant's right to the rule of law.

8. HMCS refuses to disclose information to the Claimant in the trial and conviction, in Claimant's absence, now before Welsh Administrative Court. Immediate withdrawal of bail restrictions and arrest order when part release took place in May 2011.....utter abuse of process and criminal conduct.

9. Deliberate withholding of ex MP's obtained independent medical report for 2^nd Dec 2009 hearing, castigating Dr Williams on intrusive dangerous POW unnecessary brain scan and giving false evidence for 10 Cardiff Crown Court judges.

•B.      Criminal Conduct of SWP solicitors, Dolmans of Cardiff.

1. False Feb 09 Chief Superintendant sworn affidavit despite Dolmans having been supplied with 50 odd Claimant lever arch files identifying the court cases and police break-in to his veterinary surgery with Barbara Wilding denying knowledge thereof .

2. 22^nd July 2009 Dolmans had Claimant jailed and ignored trial judge 2010 Court Order to disclose details of complaint that had to his arrest and jail, designed to delay civil trials.

3. Dolmans fully aware Dr Tegwyn Williams' false psychiatric reports concocted by police for Claimant's incarceration in Broadmoor for life.

[‘Significant brain damage', brain tumour and evidence on 2^nd December 2009]

4. Claimant receives Estimated Defendant's £800,000 legal costs

5. Refuse mediation for the cash or from tax payer quoting trial judge's view!

•C.      Trial Judge

1. Claimant refused to prosecute several incidents because convicted despite being unrelated to his proposed prosecution or after specific bullying.

Eg.   a. Overhead video catching Claimant being beaten up by police

         b. Breach of the Peace allegation withdrawn due to forged police papers, countless court irregularities and CPS perjury before Recorder of Cardiff.

         c. Roundabout incident and motoring conviction irrelevant to "We will get the ***" said by police and overhead heard by veterinary nurse planted in back of court due to Claimant's absence. All refused incidents now subject to appeal, in Wales, having been refused an English court.

2. Refuses to consolidate.....4^th, 5^th damages cases and 'machine gun' case whilst defence application is to put off the latter, effectively, for 5 years.

3. MAPPA minutes disclosure so far refused identifying more in the conspiracy, sat around eight tables, to have Claimant either shot or jailed, IPP, for life.

ie 8^th June 09 Barry police station MAPPA meeting, no one ever told the Claimant and 1st June 09 IAG meeting at police HQ, 3 weeks before arrest registered in level 3 MAPPA, top 5% most dangerous , with the hpe of getting him shot (see leaked MAPPA memos). 17^th Dec 09 Claimant's name removed from MAPPA surveillance, again, without explanation or knowledge of Claimant until too late to inform judge for bail.

•D.     Machine Gun Trial

South Wales Police arranged with CAA for four other identical ‘guns', on replica WW1 aircraft or museums to be taken by owners to gunsmiths! In Claimant's case the Welsh police travelled with it, often alone, 2000 miles, contrary to HO gun Regulations, touring the UK desperate to frame the Claimant for mandatory ten year prison sentance.

English police washed their hands if it refusing to arrest either new owner or previous owner of Lewis machine gun so Welsh police called them as prosecution witnesses after attempting to modifying the ‘gun' more, for trial, police knowing the new owner had , himself, modified it, contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

Machine gun trial heard no evidence of Claimant's ‘permanent brain damage/brain tumour' with the trial judge pretending he knew nothing of it.

Claimant refused repeated bent legal representation, sent into prison, gave no evidence, called no witnesses , refused judge's demand for defence statement, refused to sum up , jury making up its mind on the very first day of evidence stating, to the Claimant's friends and relations in a Cardiff restaurant immediately after the shambolic trial, "all the police were lying".

NHS, Williams, Prof Wood, HM prison (Nov 2010 £50,000 judgment awarded to Claimant, by trial judge against HM Prison Cardiff is still live. Retired HM Governor ignored thi judge's Order for ‘Governor at the time' statement for any disclosure of audit trail or did HMCS block serving of the summons for false imprisonment in the first place? It stinks, doesn't it?

•E.      Police/NHS/Dr Tegwyn Williams/ Professor Wood/ HM Prison Conduct

Claimant' forced prolonged illness was a deliberate tactic by most of above Defendants to prejudice his civil litigation.

After Claimant's release from prison, on 9^th Feb 2010, NHS refused to carry out a brain scan or operation, Welsh GP practices refused Claimant as a patient and only by going to France did he obtain a brain scan and urgently overdue hip replacement, in March 2011, to get him off powerful analgesics and other mind hallucinating drugs for acute pain.

Human Rights abuse was rife, but who, in Wales, is counting?

Summary

Another typical example of antiquated adversarial UK legal system, contrary to European methods of obtaining the truth, propagated in Cardiff, this time, for their HM Partnership ‘gravy train' to prolong proceedings for as long as possible using, yet again, the tried and tested method of ‘Treacle Treatment', to Delay.

7. By this court, not consolidating cases, not transferring to the High Court, out of Wales and for independent police force not examining Claimant's private prosecution evidence served, again, this week at Cardiff Central police station and currently before an English criminal court, this trial judge is at serious risk of abuse of process, blocking mediation and settlement out of court, many knowing a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice within the Welsh judiciary is proved.

8. The Defendants are relying on the usual ‘treacle treatment', for a Claimant against the State, to either ‘run out of money', ‘run out of steam' or, simply, ‘die'.

Voltaire wrote, something like, ‘When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right'.

The Claimant believes, there is only one truth, no matter which litigant has control of it.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

St Doha

Brittany.

.

Dr Tegwyn Williams a Flagrant Liar and NHS Fraudster

Maurice Kirk — Fri, 13 May 2011 11:23:00 GMT

Ms Tina Whitman,
Morgan Cole, solicitors,
Cardiff

18th May 2011

Maurice Kirk v Dr Tegwyn Williams re Bus Fares Claim

Without Prejudice

Dear Madam,

1. The South Wales Authorities conspired to falsify about one hundred and forty criminal allegations of which only around twelve proved successful.
2. In 1992 I instructed English lawyers to sue for damages for the continuing police bullying, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments.
3. Using these prosecutions the South Wales Authorities further conspired and succeeded in having my name removed from the veterinary register for life.
4. Police bullying then stopped for almost ten years.
5. But in 2009 the Chief Constable's false' affidavit caused the South Wales Authorities, under ‘Operation Chalice', to again conspire and have me remanded for nearly eight months on the ridiculous pretext of my being in breach of the 1968 Fire Arms Act for once being in possession of a decommissioned WW1 antique machine gun!
6. A conviction was never intended as the South Wales Authorities were reliant on ‘Operation Orchid' and clandestine MAPPA to fabricate a series of false psychiatric reports, for my imprisonment without trial,using your rogue NHS psychiatrist, Dr Tegwyn Williams, promised immunity to prosecution not just within the Principality but also by the General Medical Council.
7. The ‘due process' of law, in South Wales, is lamentable and clearly corrupt causing many to consider alternative methods of retribution.

Yours sincerely,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

This villain NHS doctor and a serious danger to others, without qualifications and contrary to all the experts involved, both before and after Maurice's incarceration in his evil laboratory, Caswell Clinic, wrote numerous false medical reports that were fabricated specifically for 10 Cardiff Crown Court judges to oppose his prisoner any chance of bail during his almost 8 months in Cardiff and Caswell prison.

On the whim of Barbara Wilding [next poster], the South Wales Police Chief, just over some antique WW1 remnants of a gun, even when they knew full well, it would never get across a British jury, had to dream up some other strategy to lock him away...

IPP (Imprisonment for Public Protection) needed attempted by police and CPS by using two 1983 Mental Health Act reports from two rogue doctors.

.......... Tegwyn came 'a running'!

His report alone was sufficient enough to lengthen Maurice's imprisonment and had the duress on Maurice's wife to sign their pre-prepared witness statement. If it had not backfired, in 'Operation Orchid', he would still be in jail.

Witnessed by Caswell Clinic staff, at the 8th June clandestine MAPPA meeting in Barry police station, of all places, Maurice was being set up to be shot.

Clinical Opinion by Dr. T Williams

Dr Williams, in August 09, was more than eager to produce the necessary goods for Maurice's protracted imprisonment, for life without trial. This would bury Maurice's already 19 year running civil action for damages, against the police, for 10 years of bullying and numerous maliciolus false imprisonments, all originally orchestrated for the purpose of getting him struck off as a veterinary surgeon, his pashion, for life.

Hip Operation Cancelled Again as yet Another Cardiff Court Refuses HM Prison Medical Records Disclosure & Complaint to Police Authority

Maurice Kirk — Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:42:00 GMT

MR MAURICE KIRK 1st Claimant

DR TEGWYN WILLIAMS 1st Defendant

Ref TWH.448470.48

Before District Judge T M Phillips sitting at Cardiff County Court, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, 2 Park Street,Cardiff, CF10 1ET.

Upon hearing Mr M Bowen for the claimant and Counsel for the defendant

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. The hearing of the defendants application dated 16 September 2010 to strike out the claim and to consider whether a civil restraint order is appropriate be further adjourned to 15 March 2011 at 11:00 (EHT 3 hours).

2. At the next hearing there will also be considered by the court the claimants applications dated 7th January 2011 and 18 January 2011 (yet to be listed).

3. The claimant may attend the hearing via video link (he being responsible for making the necessary arrangements well before the hearing).

4. a) in the event of the claimant being unable to attend the next hearing due to his medical condition, then he must send to the court and to the defendants solicitors at least 3 working days prior to the hearing a letter from a medical practitioner setting out the position and confirming in the Doctors opinion the inability of Mr Kirk to attend via video link.

b) In the event of the claimant's surgery being outstanding due to alleged non disclosure of medical records or documents, the Doctor do also specify in his letter:

(i) the medical records or documentation outstanding,

(ii) why any relevant tests or investigation cannot be undertaken by the French medical Profession so that the surgery can proceed.

5. Costs of today be costs in the application.

Disproportionate legal costs Lawyers, Morgan Cole, Cardiff, have threatened me with a £6000 bill if I do not withdraw, following my £40 Application, in a British court of law, just to make Dr Tegwyn Williams, of Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, or the NHS, to disclose his evidence he gave to His honour Judge Bidder QC, on the 2nd December 2009. He was there, tape recorder switched off, in a so called 'Court of Record', Cardiff Crown Court.falsifying medical record....what a joke!

What was he doing there, in the first place, is the first question? I was, as prisoner in Cardiff prison not even under his 'care'!

His trying to persuade the judge, on his own, to have me sectioned, for life, without trial, under the Section 41 of 1983 Mental Health Act, to a High Security Prison, was an uphill struggle. But his masonic masters, South Wales Police, had so ordered or he could no longer be allowed to worship the devil.

Tomorrow, in Cardiff County Court, be there, these lawyers, barristers, clerks etc, ALL AT TAX PAYER'S EXPENSE,just for a petty debt action for, lost bus fares, will be there....you will enjoy...Case is at 2pm BUT read the latest Downloads first

Dr Tegwyn Williams, of Caswell Clinic, Bridgend refuses to clarify his opinion and conduct , over such a serious matter as possible brain tumour .

How, on 2nd December 09, he tells the Cardiff Crown Court I have a possible brain tumour and too dangerous to be released when at the 17th December 2009 MAPPA meeting, he tells high ranking officers of the South Wales Police, the prosecutor, social services, probation and prison, all sitting around the same table, in his clinic, a completely opposing medical opinion?

This caused the meeting to rule I was "no longer considered dangerous to the public and my name was immediately removed from MAPPA level 3 category, [terrorist level].

BUT, to this day Dr Tegwyn Williams, South Wales NHS officials, HM Prison and MAPPA have refused to notify the patient of any of this and continue to refuse the information to the surgeons, waiting to operate, on either side of the English Channel.

It stinks, doesn't it?

Disproportionate Legal Costs: Breach of Human Rights

I am possibly about to go into hospital and so email without being too close on detail, save to say that at this time, that I draw the attention of the Court and Defendant's lawyers to the European Court of Human Rights having ruled that the Daily Mirror's freedom of expression was violated by the legal costs it had to pay when it lost a privacy case brought by Naomi Campbell.

Although arguments will need to be reversed and translated to other human rights, for a comparison with my claim as the Daily Mirror are journalists and was the Defendant. As we are aware, this thinking of the Court of Human Rights, to limit legal costs is in keeping with some comments in my submission in December 2010, when asking His Honour Seys Llewellyn QC for permission to appeal.

As also in my submission in December 2010, the arguments here are also more profound than how much legal costs can the Defendant or Defendant's lawyers claim in my Cardiff case.

Drawing from London barrister Mr Challenger's comments, it would seem that public policy on where the Police (or public bodies) can be sued is, in reality very much affected by the cost of employing lawyers. As lawyers may not now be able to charge as much in legal costs, that would seem another reason for public policy to be reviewed to find what incremental changes may occur from restricting lawyers costs.

page 2

2nd December 2009

ALL PROCEEDINGS

(11.39)

JUDGE BIDDER: ... appropriately qualified psychiatrist then the fitness to plead doesn't really arise. I have one report by you reaching a conclusion; I have another report by Dr Silva reaching a different conclusion. I can't act on the basis of that issue without there being two such reports and there aren't two such reports. In the circumstances I don't think there is a great deal of purpose in you remaining in court.

MR TWOMLOW: May I just say perhaps, having spoken to Dr Williams this morning, that I think having seen the contents of Dr Silva's report he is also of the view that Mr Kirk would be fit to plead subject to the ... it was only the case of whether he has cancer or not I think that Dr Williams was concerned about, but I didn't wish to ...

Continuing "HM Partnership" Cardiff Conspiracy

This following eight page submission, with French doctor's request for medical records, took weeks of work to obtain and were e-mailed to the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre at 9.30am on Tuesday, two and a half days before the 2pm hearing but was not given to the presiding judge.

Extract of secure e-mail, to Cardiff court, that DID NOT BOUNCE BACK carrying the 'submissions', as an example to the naifve, of the evilness, tax payer funded "HM Partnership" in Cardiff play, every day.

'please forward asap to the learned judge dealing with the above case

There must surely be another person on another e-maill to deal with this?

All current known Cardiff court e-mails bounce back'

To the Cardiff County Court

BS61459, CF101741, 0CF03922 & 8 Others

Maurice Kirk v Dr Tegwyn Williams

20th January 2011 Hearing

Application for Adjournment and Disclosure (Request Dr Williams/Defendant make a signed statement)

1) It may help the Court to know that, I am unwell and at my home in Brittany, awaiting a
hip operation on 20 January 2011 in France.

2) Therefore this reply is worded by lay persons (non lawyers). The opinions show the
independent view of a team trying to help because of their concerns.

3) In short, there is major concern of this moment is the way the Defendant Dr Tegwyn
Williams, shows bad faith and „deliberately fails to deal‟ by trying to "hide behind
lawyers" and he will not „personally‟ comment or clarify in issues as serious as brain
cancer, brain damage and severe disorders of the mind.

4) Furthermore the Defendant‟s refusal to clarify causes the confusion that in turn delays
urgent hip operation that with problems with mediation and morphine contributes to
keeping the Claimant too unwell to attend court and proceed with this case.

5) An update is that the Defendant‟s obstructive behaviour that therefore delays hip
operations, may have caused, and may continue to cause permanent medical damage
to nerve tissue around the Claimant hip, so to permanently damage the Claimant chance
of recovery.

Adjournment

6) The Court Order of 26 November 2010 point 2 says.

"2. Any applications to adjourn the hearing by reason of medical
matter must be supported by a medical practitioner's letter or
certificate which confirms an inability to attend a Court hearing
estimated to last not more than 1 hour."

7) It seems to say that a doctor's letter is needed for adjournment. That tells me to
expect adjournment if I comply with that Order by the attached letter from Dr Leclerc,
Merdrignac, France. The Breton doctor is concerned that the surgeons have not been
supplied with Dr Tegwyn Williams' information given to the December 09 Crown Court
and to MAPPA meetings. Dr Leclerc is the source of my monthly supply of morphine
sulphate.

Merit and some reasons why the Court may (if it so wishes) find in the Claimant's
favour on all (Claim and Costs).

8) This case is over the expenses the Claimant incurred in trying to find out what opinion Dr Tegwyn Williams has being expressing regards the Claimant. The Claimant believes the reason why the Claimant was not handed over the notes and records, when attending, is because either the records never existed or the Defendant wrote final reports not unlike writing fiction. The Claimant believes the defendant has been dishonest in his report by saying that which he knew not to be true. If what the Claimant believes is true, then the claimant believes Dr Williams should reimburse expenses.

9) As a part of professional standards and conduct for Psychiatrists, careful notes and
records must exist behind the process of any assessment and the final outcome and that notes and records are to be full and copious.

10) It may help the Court to know, that in what records or reports that exist the
Defendant appears to more determine facts, than explore clinical issues regards being
assertion that the Claimant is delusional about very specific facts such as whether or not
the Claimant was harassed by Police. (In contrast to what Dr Williams says His Honour
Seys Llewellyn QC, however, has decided in a preliminary Judgment, dated 30
November 2010, that the sheer volume of incidents of alleged harassment gives merit
for the court to investigate).

11) It is therefore difficult to see how Dr Williams can claim the Claimant is delusional
about quite specific facts.

12) One easy comparison is that the Civil Aviation Authority, in 2010 deemed the
Claimant fit to fly his aeroplanes.

13) To easily support the view of mischievous manipulations there is evidence that
Professor Roger Wood re-wrote his report as being seen by reference to the ex-chief
constable when the chief constable was in office when the report originally written. Most
doctors, possibly as many as nearly twenty, seem not to agree with Dr Tegwyn Williams.
There are many other facts to prove this conduct.

14) The Claimant believes the defendant, having acted improperly regards expressing
opinion he knew to be misleading or knew not to be true, now needed to destroy or hide the notes and records behind any reports.

15) Therefore the Claimant requested the Defendant‟s employers arrange disclosure of
medical records and notes and the Claimant was invited to Caswell Clinic, Bridgend to
collect notes and records. The Claimant had paid for their release and incurred further
expense several times travelling to the Clinic.

16) The Claimant, by acting lawfully and properly, tried to find out what are the notes and records that were used to help arrive at what hopefully would have been an honest and competent opinion. A Court Claim was filed by the Claimant when the Defendant seemed most unwilling to clarify or disclose essential information that the Claimant had paid for, and where the Claimant had incurred travelling expenses. The Defendant appeared so unhelpful and obstructive to the Claimant, to appear to be acting in bad faith.

17) It is entirely normal NHS procedure for a patient to attend to collect confidential
medical information, especially larger medical notes and record files as the post can be
too problematic and particularly insecure for such sensitive information as psychiatric
records.

18) The Claimant chose to exercise his right to attend, but also was told by NHS staff at
his GP surgery that the Defendant's employer and/or Defendant had said the records
are available for collection.

19) The Claimant believes he has obvious and compelling reason to be anxious to attend and find out information for which he is lawfully entitled to know, and paid for. The Court transcript 2 December 2009 shows that the Defendant Dr Tegwyn Williams has been saying that the Claimant has brain cancer, (and more).

20) The Defendant's professional body helps show reason for justification for the
concern that the Defendant shows bad faith and "deliberately failing to deal" by trying to
"hide behind lawyers" and will not "personally" comment or clarify in issues as serious as
brain cancer, brain damage and severe disorders of the mind.

21) To help determine reasonableness, Dr Tegwyn Williams professional body has
guidelines. The Royal College of Psychiatrists page 6 (copy attached) says

"Give patients the information they ask for or need about their condition, its treatment or prognosis
Give information to patients in a way they can understand
Be readily accessible to patients and colleagues when on duty

You must not delay treatment........."

The Royal College of Psychiatrists (copy attached) page 2 also says of duties of doctor registered with the GMC

Give patients information in a way they can understand
Be honest and trustworthy
Avoid abusing your position as a doctor

22) The Claimant has a hip operation booked for 20 January 2011 in France. Dr Williams bad faith is made worse, because the absence of Dr Tegywn Williams to personally clarify causes operations to be cancelled, when the claimant to be most unwell, insevere pain and suffering increasing irreparable nerve damage by operations not proceeding, because of the uncertainty and confusion caused by Dr Tegwyn Williams still refusing to clarify, even when is lawyers now are starting to acknowledge the issues.

23) Regardless of the needed operation, the Claimant quite obviously urgently needs Dr
Tegwyn Williams to personally clarify what is meant by and the prognosis of brain
cancer, permanent brain damage and severe disorders of the mind, so that the Claimant can plan how to live his life.

24) Other Doctors are at a loss to make the needed specific comment, as the Defendant still has failed to provide medical records and notes that would or should occur, if Dr Williams forms an honest and competent opinion as to why he thinks these conditions are relevant to the Claimant.

25) The Claimant asks and feels astonished, questions how the UK Courts can allow
either doctors and lawyers to act as callously in full gaze of the Courts and professional
bodies, and asks for initiatives to redress the balance of power.

26) Furthermore the Defendants lawyers threaten the unwell Claimant with cost to go
into many thousands of pounds over a claim most minor in monetary terms, as a way to
intimidate the Claimant into not learning of such important information when the
Claimant has every right to know.

27) The Claimants asks the Courts support where the Claimant believes Dr Tegwyn
Williams abused his position when the Claimant attended to collect his medical records
and now tries to further abuse his position by hiding behind lawyer and their willingness
to use cost to intimidate by disproportionate use of lawyers fees.

28) The Claimant believes Dr Tegwyn Williams is therefore causing these delays, by not
simply clarifying issues himself.

29) There is also the issue of the total contempt that Dr Tegwyn Williams showed for the
Claimant and the utter unreasonableness when as a patient the Claimant tries to collect
medical records for which he has paid.

30) Given access to the requested information is entirely reasonable and lawful, (both
what was originally requested and also not as yet clarified by Dr Williams) the Claimant
raise the question whether both the Defendant and his lawyers Discriminate against the
Claimant to impose less favourable treatment, (due to alleged disorders of the mind), in
the way the Claimant is denied access to what most people have a right to expect be
provided in a way to afford them dignity.

31) The Claimant believes the Defendant and his lawyers use the power and financial
resources of the state over the Claimant to deny human rights (ECHR Article 3 and
Article 8) and access to a fair trial (ECHR Article 6). The Claimant raises whether the
Court has a duty to protect the Claimant, so that the UK members state does not breach
the human rights of the Claimant.

Disproportionate Costs

32) Obviously the Claimant believes the Defendant and his lawyers are trying to
intimidated the Claimant out of his rights by what many would view as disproportionate
legal costs. Disproportionate, because of the small nature of the original claim and all
that as required was for Dr Tegwyn Williams to personally clarify, as his professional
body expects of him.

Can the Defendant (a clinician who writes how unwell the Claimant will be) Object
to or Claim Costs for an Adjournment on medical grounds?

33) The core papers mentioned by the Defendant's lawyers include in their core
correspondence reference to documents where the Defendant Dr Tegwyn Williams is
saying there is "clear evidence" of a deterioration from brain damage and/or mental
disorder, (even brain cancer) that will mean the Claimant condition will never improve
and will mean the Claimant cannot focus to deal with legal proceedings. Can either the
Defendant or his lawyer, be honest and competent, and be upholding the high standards of the profession, (or as an Officer of the Court) in asking the Court to press ahead in the absence of the Claimant on medical grounds, when they promote that the Claimant is seriously unwell?

34) The Claimant puts to the Defendant and Defendant's lawyers whether such tactics,
is conduct becoming of a doctor who instructs lawyers, or a lawyer or law firm who
should be allowed to represent any in the caring professions or the NHS.

A Challenge to Dr Tegwyn Williams to volunteer by 20 January 2011 or else a
Request For Court Order for Dr Williams to make a personal signed statement to
the Court.

35) One example of the relevance of Dr Williams voluntarily or by Court Order making a
personal signed statement is that Dr Williams can show whether or not he is obstructive
or shows bad faith, or a poor attitude towards the Claimant while the matter is before the Court, where if such occurs, the Court opportunity to, if it so wishes, determined whether it is reasonable to believe Dr Tegwyn Williams has also acted in bad faith so to causes the Claimant expense, when the Claimant attended to collect records.

a) Brain Cancer: On the Issue of the Claimant, and brain cancer, taking into account the
court transcript 2 December 2009 and for Dr Williams to also explain the prognosis of his concerns.

b) Brain damage: What records, notes and evidence exists to support Dr Williams
claims. Explain point 32 of his final 2009 report of the "Clear evidence" in the clear
evidence of brain damage and the prognosis. What exactly does Dr Tegwyn Williams
know of the evidence of physical brain damage, and if any indication and what level of
certainty of physical brain damage existing, and how does Dr Tegwyn Williams see this
as clear evidence as opposed to a potential, regards any physical condition affecting specific behaviour. How does Dr Williams judge behaviour the Claimant's behaviour compared to a leading Welsh Court Judge as below?

c) Paranoid Delusional Disorder: This issue can be a determination of facts. Did Dr
Williams have information to determine facts to decide the Claimant was delusional
about facts. Dr Williams is asked to explain notes, records, evidence facts. How and
what evidence there is that the Claimant has any such severe disorder of the mind and
particularly the prognosis taking into account that that His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn
QC says there is an unusual case with a sheer volume of incidents that require
investigation by the Court

Defendant's Lawyer's Conduct

36) The conduct of the Defendant‟s lawyer is of concern, by her repeatedly merely
asserting she gives answer, when in reality she des not. For example the Defendant's
lawyer frequently uses arguments like the Defendant is not responsible for the third
parties (organisations or people) who receive what Dr Tegwyn Williams says. When the
issue that needs to be addressed is for Dr Tegwyn Williams to clarify exactly what he
says, why and how his expressed opinion emerged or is sourced in medical records,
notes and medical evidence.

37) The Claimant's concern of whether there is bad faith by the Defendant, continues
because the Defendant's lawyers letter of 6th January 2011 not only fails to deal with
issues, but seems to the Claimant to deliberately avoid issues. Above all, whether or not
the Claimant has Brain Cancer, and if any records exist relevant to such as (but not only)
the comment in the 2 December 2009 court transcript as below, of Dr Williams saying of the Claimant's brain cancer.

The Court Transcript and Brain Cancer

38) According to Dr Tegwyn Williams' Professional body, Dr Williams should give
information to the Claimant and in a way that the Claimant can understand. That has not
been occurring ever since the Claimant was in his "care" between August and October
2009.

39) At Court on 2 December 2009, the Claimant was not present and what happens here is an odd intrusion by Dr Williams who needs to explain why he is speaking in that Court room about Mr Kirk, with Mr Kirk not there or having opportunity to rebut what he says?

40) The Claimant emphasises Dr Williams has been speaking at Court and Mr Twomlow
summarises what Dr Williams says in Dr Williams presence. Dr Williams hears the
extract below, and so stands there at Court to agree it to be true

41) The issues raised here are to ask Dr Williams to clarify what he meant by what he said to Mr Twomlow and the Court, where Dr Williams does not make small talk here but intend his professional comments about the Claimant to be taken very seriously.

42) The Court Transcript 2 December 2009 11.39am (page two) starts as if someone
inadvertently switches on the machine, saying:

i. JUDGE BIDDER:...........: ..appropriately qualified psychiatrist then the fitness to plead doesn't really arise. I have one report by you reaching a onclusion: I have another report by Dr Silva reaching a different onclusion. I can't act on the basis of that issue without there being two such reports and there aren't two such reports. In the circumstances I don't think there is a great deal of purpose in you remaining in Court.

ii. Mr TWOMLOW (CPS): May I perhaps, having spoken to Dr Williams this morning, that I think having seen the contents of Dr Silva's report he is also of the view that Mr Kirk would be fit to plead subject to the.....it was only the case of whether he has cancer or not I think that Dr Williams was concerned about, but I didn't wish to.....

43) As previously stated the Claimant believes that the Royal College of Psychiatrist
guidelines on how to deal with this kind of situation can show how reasonable or
unreasonable Dr Tegwyn Williams has acted, relevant to this claim, and so whether or
not the Court should find in favour of Claimant. Does Dr Williams now "give patients the
information they ask for or need about their condition, its treatment or prognosis" and
"give information to patients in a way they can understand"?

Give patients information in a way they can understand?

44) How is the Claimant to understand his prognosis about brain cancer or the other
condition of the brain or mind, when Dr Williams will not clarify, or disclose about
something as serious as his formally expressed comments about brain cancer?

Difficult to find a doctor who agrees With Dr Tegwyn Williams

45) As explained in more detail latter in this document, please note most doctors
(potentially nearly twenty doctors) do not seem to agree with Dr Williams on his
generally prejudicial if not defamatory tone and psychiatric diagnosis about the Claimant being mentally ill to the point of delusional about based on specific factual issue, so to question whether Dr Williams abuses his position, in giving opinion he knows (or should know) not to be true.

Additional Difficulties, Expenses and Costs

46) The Claimant wishes the Court to know that many other important Court cases have
been delayed by the defendants not clarifying the information required regards my
application for disclosure about brain cancer. The delay is also from the delay to
operations on my hip caused by non disclosure of the same information, that has I turn
caused me to remain most unwell, immobile, in fluctuating severe pain to affect
concentration, and use of morphine for an unwise duration.

47) The Claimant alleges malicious intent behind the complications from delays and
adjournments in this claim before the Court are caused from the harm and difficulties
caused by the Defendant. This includes him to block the Claimant's operation by, what
seems to the Claimant as Dr Williams unprofessional, if not dishonest opinions in Court
and in communication with his superiors, besides the non-communication with the
Claimant.

Claimant Being Absent 20 January 2011 Confirms Wish to Appeal if becomes
relevant.

48) In matters as serious as the Defendant and his lawyers acting in bad faith over brain cancer, brain damage and disorder of the mind, the Claimant who is unable to attend on 20 January 2011 is ready to go to appeal, if necessary and asks for permission, should it become relevant.

Enclosed Both UK and Breton GP letters requesting clarification

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

18th January 2011

South Wales Police Authority
Bridgend
South Wales

19th Jan 2011

Dear Sir,

Complaint against South Wales Police attempting to have me shot

1. Further to advice from the Home Office, see enclosed, I make complaint of the threat to my life caused following the erroneous information considered in the 8th June 2009 MAPPA meeting in Barry Police Station when members of South Wales Police forensic hospital. Caswell clinic attended. An internal memo, in your posession, indicationg I may be shot by police. But there was a deliberate delay of several weeks in order to obtain that opportunity before arresting a catagory MAPPA 3, terrorist level, believed to be in the possesion of one or machine guns and live ammunition..

2. I further complain of subsequent actions by Dr Tegyn Williams of Caswell Clinic and police, who, once I was arrested, had me sectioned under the 35 legislation of 1983 Mental Health Act, without even his examination, on the 22nd June2009. Their intention with the changed view of the ridiculous charges, of trading in machine guns, now unlikely to obtaining a conviction switched to some other way they interfere with the now, 19 year running damges claim for malicious prosecutions and false imprisonment.caused by the same force..

3. I further complain, following that failing, only by luck, the police attempt, on 2nd December 2009, to obtain for me a section 41 to Broadmoor , for life, without trial reliant on known fabricated evidence..

4. I further complain of ther continuing harassment and fabricated arrests ,since my release, unconvicted, since 9th February 2010 and refusal to properly investigate serious acts of criminal damage on my property and an assault on myserlf deliberately avoiding interviewing the only independant witness present

This list is not exhaustive....

yours

Remanded in Cardiff Prison Until December

Pie2211 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:24:00 GMT

Maurice has been remanded to Cardiff prison until 4/12/09 when he will be heard by another judge over his fitness to plead.

Rapport final par Dr Tegwyn Williams

Pie2211 — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:12:00 GMT

Maurice Kirk laisse paraître à Cardiff Crown Court de nouveau le lundi 26 Octobre 2009, énumérés à 10h, mais vérifiez auprès de l'Office Listing Cour le vendredi (Tél: 02920 678 760). Il a lu au téléphone depuis la page 11 Rapport final par Dr Tegwyn Williams. (Maurice n'est pas autorisé à envoyer des copies à ses avocats ni à sa famille, par tout moyen, lettre, fax ou courrier). Il affirme également le rapport contient au moins 20 graves erreurs de faits. La conclusion du rapport est que Maurice a une lésion cérébrale incurable et que personne ne peuvent encore rien faire pour lui.

Para. 39 comprend les mots: Si le tribunal souhaite un second avis, elle envisage d'instruire un psychiatre de l'hôpital de haute sécurité afin d'évaluer que Maurice Kirk à la fois commence un traitement, et aussi dans quel environnement que le traitement doit avoir lieu". Para. 40 dit: Maurice Kirk peut retourner au tribunal pour tout acte de disposition que le tribunal juge opportun."

Final Report by 'Dr' Tegwyn Williams states Brain Injury and Washes Hands

Pie2211 — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:16:00 GMT

Maurice Kirk is due to appear in Cardiff Crown Court again on Monday 26th October 2009, listed for 10am, but check with the Court Listing Office on Friday (Tel: 02920 678 760). He has read out over the telephone from the 11 page 'Final Report' by 'Dr.' Tegwyn Williams. (Maurice is not allowed to send copies to his lawyers or his family, by any means, letter, fax or email). He also states the report contains at least 20 serious errors of fact. The conclusion of the report is that Maurice has an untreatable brain injury and that no more can be done for him.

Para. 39 includes the words, "Should the court wish a second opinion, they may wish to consider instructing a psychiatrist from a High Security Hospital to assess Maurice Kirk both as to treatment, & also in which environment that treatment should take place". Para. 40 says, "Maurice Kirk can return to court for any disposal that the court sees fit."

New Downloads

Pie2211 — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:39:00 GMT

A new batch of documents has been uploaded to the downloads section and includes:

Misc Letters and Correspondence

by Pie2211

Fri, Oct 16 2009 11:38 AM

Background to Arrest for Gun Possession

by Maurice Kirk

Fri, Oct 16 2009 11:11 AM

Social Worker's Report

by Maurice Kirk

Fri, Oct 16 2009 10:56 AM

08 Oct letter John Smith State of Our Courts

by Maurice Kirk

Fri, Oct 16 2009 10:45 AM

Judicial Review Letter 3rd October 2009

by Maurice Kirk

Fri, Oct 16 2009 10:39 AM

R E G I N A - v - MAURICE KIRK Court Transcript 01 10 2009

Court Appearance Delayed and New Pysch Report

Pie2211 — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:04:00 GMT

Maurice's court appearance has been delayed to 2pm today.

Also latest Caswell pysch report has been published in downloads.

This is the one that will be presented to the judge today. It is now suggesting that Maurice is mentally FIT for trial but NOT FIT enough to represent himself in court due to brain injuries sustained in air crashes and that he should be detained for a further 28 days.

???

Summary of Fascinating Reading under DOWNLOADS

Pie2211 — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:02:00 GMT

The following documents form an engrossing read, whatever your point of view regarding Maurice Kirk's recent incarceration and stubborn refusal to play ball with the authorities. You can find them in the download section in a very readable form compared to what we've had to work with in the past.

Here's a summary:

Operation Chalice
A mind boggling read.

Interim Psychiatric Report August 2009
An interesting and revealing examination of Maurice Kirk's character. Maurice himself was engrossed in the observations made about him. His only complaint, in terms of its highly personal content, concerns the forensic listing on page 6, to which he has supplied a response in 'MJK Response to Forensics in Aug09 Psychiatric Report.pdf'. This is the report presented to the Crown Court at the end of August 2009 which led to Maurice being detained at Caswell Clinic for a further 28 days examination.

MJK's Response to 'Interim Psychiatric Report August 2009' Forensics
Maurice's repost to the forensics listed in 'Interim Psychiatric Report August 2009 Caswell.pdf'

A Bloody Good Read!
Maurice Kirk's clinical psychology report presented in early September 2009.
After reading this Maurice said: "it was like having my soul laid bare, albeit a bloody good read".

The Indictment
MAURICE JOHN KIRK is charged as follows...

Arrest Pro-forma
Operation Orchid. Start Time: 08.15

On October 1st Maurice goes to Crown Court to hear whether he will be transferred out of Caswell Clinic and fit for trial or alternatively remain in the system indefinitely. The content of some of these documents will no doubt play a part in that decision, or maybe not?