Latest News

Here Is a statement from Maurice received today.

In October 2013 Her Honour Judge Eleri Rees agreed that today's case involving the CPS Barrister Gareth Evans MUST be heard before the harassment/tenants/Rogan trials as she realised that the other three were a consequence of the barrister trial.  The Police clearly set up the tenant situation and of course through the evidence of the independent witness they have dropped that case.

All three cases caused him to be incarcerated so he has been unable to complete the Civil Action against the South Wales Police.

Today he has not been allowed access to his legal papers nor his promised computer and will appear via video link which means he cannot talk with his legal support nor collect meaningful paperwork.

To date he has been held for 3 years (18 months) in prison to do with the harassment case which 14 judges have refused to accept/ignored that as he was exposing a crime under the Act section 3 i.ii.iii he is entitled to freedom,

because the Dr continues to be protected by the courts and has NEVER faced cross examination or even examination on Maurice's case within a courtroom!

After Maurice's convictions by the jury on Tuesday for the two counts of breach of restraining order and making a threat to damage property of the doctor, the prosecution indicated that they were serving notice of discontinuance in connection with the original charges of Witness Intimidation and common assaults.

It was revealed in court that this was the proper procedure, as there had been no Indictment actually preferred, so Maurice couldn't technically be arraigned on the charges.

Maurice's appeal against his conviction on 25 June 2013 for alleged assault of prosecutor Mr. Gareth Evants at the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre was listed on 27 March for directions.

Judge Crowther adjourned Maurice's appeal to be heard at Bristol Crown Court, something Maurice has been campaigning in favour of for a considerable time now.

It appears that Judge Crowther knows Mr. Gareth Evans personally, so he was disqualified from hearing Maurice's appeal, which it is understood is the reason for the transfer to Bristol.

If that is the case, it may be that Judge Crowther should recuse himself from hearing Maurice's two other outstanding appeals against his conviction for alleged assault of Prison Officer Rogan at Cardiff Prison and for failure to identify the driver under the Road Traffic Act.

The reason for this would be that there would be a "real danger" of bias for Judge Crowther to hear these two outstanding appeals if he knows Mr. Gareth Evans and knows that Maurice has been convicted of assaulting him, especially when one of the two other outstanding appeals is one of assault, even though not involving Mr. Gareth Evants.

There would appear to be a suspicion of bias and prejudice here, especially as Judge Crowther may be personally acquainted with Mr. Gareth Evans.

This information emerged at the hearing on Tuesday when the prosecutor in that jury trial, Mr. Smyth from Bristol revealed to Judge Rowland that Judge Crowther personally knows Mr Gareth Evans.

In the meantime, Maurice's sentencing has been adjourned pending the outcome of these appeals.

Apparantly the Gareth Evans assault appeal is going to be heard for mention on Monday 31 March at Bristol Crown Court before the Recorder of Bristol HHJ Ford and a date fixed for the hearing sometime in July.

This will mean that Maurice won't be sentenced for the other charges he was found guilty of on Tuesday 24 March until after that appeal has been heard.  

The Gareth Evans appeal is now listed for directions and to fix a date for hearing before HH Judge Horton in Court 9 at Bristol Crown Court on Monday 31 March.

For the record:

At the last hearing of the Civil damages claim Maurice attended along with three others in support. Two attendees sat at the rear of the court while one sat on the legal benches behind Maurice to take notes of the proceedings / the comings and the goings (Maurice left for a while to fetch some documentation).

A week or so after that hearing Maurice met the notetaker in Bath and the notetaker handed over the notes - but excluding redacted portions of those notes which were 'private notes' of other things [Errors in procedures perhaps] that occurred during Maurice's legal arguments and of when he was absent. The whereabouts of the notes with redactions 'given to Maurice' are unknown. It is not known who he 'may or may not have passed those notes on to'.

Save - wherever those notes are; the redactions - are only known by the notetaker - as are other matters discussed in Bath.

Apparently an other was supposed to have turned up that day - The last Civil Case hearing - but failed to for some or other reason ... which is somewhat known of out there on the net - that has a memory.    

Is the world of 'Snake-oil salesmen' / 'Quackery' having to come to terms with the 'death of their industry' such that their created industry has been aiding and abetting failing governments throughout the world?

I'm just wondering whether the jury was as hand picked as in the case of the Musas or at least briefed?

After what I've seen by now, ANYTHING goes:

-- against Maurice

-- to cover up crimes

-- and protect public 'servants' who committed them.  

Legal tip Number: 666

A judge ought to voluntarily stand himself down when he knows that there are conflicts of interest in him presiding on an issue before the court and where he cannot be seen to be fair unbiased and impartial.

But when a judge relies upon the lesser legals in his midst 'remaining silent' about the conflicts of interest; the lessers of course being cautious of comitting career suicide ... well what do we have ...

A union style 'closed shop' of far from justice being seen at all?