Legal Battles : family courts

Criminal Cases Review Commission Refuse Disclosure of Musa Nigerian Snatched Children Haringay Council Restraining Order

Maurice Kirk — Mon, 27 Apr 2015 07:04:00 GMT

CCRC confirm, today, even my lawyers are not allowed magistrates' court log and clerk's notes jury asked for!!

CCRC, CPS, Cardiff HMC&TS and judge all refuse to disclose court records of my 1st Dec 2011'Harassment ' conviction

So who has the moral fibre to produce the proof of that order and MUSA Restraining Order service? (I was jailed for attempting to fly six of the kids back to Nigeria)

15 04 24 Open letter.docx

11 09 22 MUSA SNATCH KIDS BACK ORDER shr.pdf

https://vimeo.com/19402817

House for public court records

ST Donats Airfield AUCTION at Llantwit Major UNLESS Sold Prior to Date

Maurice Kirk — Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:38:00 GMT

Any Offer over £650,000 before AUCTION, by Court Order, will be seriously considered Tel 07907937953

BUT do not forget:

T20120090 - Kirk - proc from 10.40 - 12.26 - 04.05.12.pdf

"We Will GetThe B******d"
See overhead video

http://www.youtube.com/user/kirkflyingvet

DAMAGES THREE MONTH TRIAL STARTS 18th Feb13 @ Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

St Donats Airfield Llantwit Major For Sale / Auction April 2013

Nearly 20 Acres of prime real estate offered in picturesque Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, less than a mile from the sea with other adjacent farm land possibly available.

The estate consists of a five bed dwelling with stables settled in about 3 acres of ancient woodland and surrounded by almost 18 acres of good arable farm land, three runways, one with Class 5 ILS, two hangars, a trout stream and small lake

Contact: maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

)ther property For Sale

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/for_sale/default.aspx

https://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=you+tube+maurice+kirk&oq=you+tube+maurice+kirk&gs_l=hp.12..0i8i13i30.8355.14767.0.19394.21.21.0.0.0.0.863.5566.0j11j6j1j0j2j1.21.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.2.hp.pkPW1JFKNGA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.41934586,d.d2k&fp=32705b7f4f76e02c&biw=1093&bih=490

http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/

Is it worth being on hunger strike? Who's worse: South Wales Police or Haringey Council?

SabineKMcNeill — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:10:00 GMT

On the positive side,

somebody high up has ordered South Wales Police to return his legal papers
Tottenham Police Station and Cardiff Central Station are ordered to hand over everything concerning him
South Wales Police' Solicitors have sent a judgement dated 25th July 2011 concerning the release of MAPPA minutes
why has it been withheld for such a long time?
why did it take the Defendant's solicitor to send it rather than the Court?

On the negative side,

Maurice expects not to be able to walk soon
Maurice needs to know who has sent cash, cheques, postal orders or stamps so that he can complain about the stealing that has gone on
he fears that he will be prevented from cross-examining Dr Tegwyn Williams by the case being dropped on November 10th
he suspects that he will be held 'indefinitely' to stop him from pursuing his legal actions and being there for the Musa hearing on October 31st
he has evidence that the latest psychiatric report by Dr Tegwyn Williams was sent to Haringey doctors to try and keep him in prison and stop him from supporting the Musas.

Anybody seen Big Brother lately? Are we living in 1984 or in 2011?

Here is a recording of one of his latest phone calls.

This is the phone line for visitors to book a visit - but you must be patient. They let you wait and wait and may give you one or two options some five or six days away: 02920 923 327

Worst case of police harassment + worst case of child snatching in the UK in Cardiff Magistrates Court on 5th October

SabineKMcNeill — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:59:00 GMT

On September 28th, Maurice refused to leave his prison cell. Hence he will be on videolink on 5th October and we expect he will seize the opportunity of talking about the utter criminality of Haringey Council, Police, Social Services, Solicitors & Barristers, as they collude in covering up the disappearance of six Nigerian children.

Please read here why it's the worst child snatching case in the UK.
And please click here to see why Maurice's must be the worst of all police harassment experiences.

And make a reality check which country you live in. Ian Josephs publishes about child snatching on Forced Adoption from Monaco and writes what's unique in the UK.

Please write to Maurice as prisoner A7306AT in HMP Cardiff, Know Road, South Glamorgan, CF24 0UG or phone 029 2092 3100.

Haringey Council refuses Consular Visit to Nigerian Children - Letter to Home and Foreign Secretary

Maurice Kirk — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:19:00 GMT

After my release from London's Holborn police cell, with all allegations laughed out of court, I might even have experienced a touch of sadness to leave such a bunch of 'Peelers' of the old school. I was treated throughout my incarceration with both respect and courtesy for PACE so unlike my 20 years of experiences in South Wales.

The two arresting officers were of exceptional quality, restoring much of my lost faith in those who, so often, are given such a thankless task in their attempts to keep the peace in our kingdom. My memories of the Principal Registry of the UK Family Courts near by, however; were quite a different matter!

Were these letters written by the same person or who wrote this letter?

Well, Haringey Council used this letter to justify their snatching 5 children on 8 April 2010 as a precursor for taking the 6th baby on 11 June 2011, after birth.

The letter that went out this morning:

Dear Home Secretary and dear Foreign Secretary

This is to request you to do everything in your powers to send the Nigerian family – with all their children - back to Nigeria. They were taken into “care” by Haringey Council on 8 April 2010.

As the latest of their apparent cover up activities, Haringey Council have refused a request for a consular visit on the basis of the children “not being Nigerian”.

British Govt Detains Nigerian Couple’s Six Children was published on 28 August 2011 by the National Nigerian paper Leadership.

Please find attached a copy of the High Commission’s request for a visit together with the confirmation that Mr Chiwar Musa is the biological father of Bishop Gloria Musa’s five children. Their sixth baby was taken at birth by five police officers.

The DNA confirmation was carried out for the Council, for they alleged that the mother was a sex worker and child trafficker, when it could be the opposite.

Trusting that you will deal with this request with your most urgent attention,

Yours sincerely,

Sabine K McNeill, Web Publisher and McKenzie Friend

Cc:
Bishop Gloria and Chiwar Musa
The Prime Minister
The Deputy Prime Minister
His Excellency, The High Commissioner of Nigeria
The Deputy High Commissioner, Sierra Leone, personal friend
Lord Harris of Haringey, former Council Leader
Claire Kober, Leader of Haringey Council
Maurice Kirk, McKenzie Friend
Ian Josephs, Publisher of Forced Adoption, Monaco
John Hemming MP

We are now leaving to go to stand outside the police station with my loud haler and remind the police the Musas have refused to sign in for bail on Monday , Wednesday and today and will not until they get the results of their baby's drug tests results no doubt already given to the Haringey mob two months ago.

Then it is proposed to visit, with loud haler and swelling crowd of supporters, the last known address of the last known foster parent and then, by dividing the small army of liberators, on to several schools similtaneously for trouble.

This only just the beginning of what is planned unless the Uk Parliament does not step in and save the family and help them home to Nigeria

Links coming shortly:

1. Audio tapes of Michelle Collins' involvement with the six children and Africa

2. Gloria Musa's mother's letter to Nigerian High Court

3..Both Musa's custody records and police medical results on alleged drug doping of their baby

4. Cardiff graphologist's opinion on authenticity of alleged F's complaint letter

5. Resignation letters from Haringey Council

6. Private Prosecutions of both culpable lawyers and Haringey council officials

7. Family Court Reform

Gloria on video just wishing her kids were no longer a burden on the tax payer! However, more and more foster carers, corrupt lawyers and judges get fat by dragging parents through courts while their children are paid for...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7fyyEUDBC4&feature=related

Haringey Council's Barrister and Children's Solicitor make False Claims so that Judge Imprisons Maurice

SabineKMcNeill — Fri, 09 Sep 2011 05:56:00 GMT

Not being family means you don't get information from Holborn Police Station. As McKenzie Friend, I was eventually told he was detained for nearly five hours until 6.10pm, without any charges or further action.

Meanwhile, I've pieced this together from a witness of the Nigerian parents whose story was reported in the national Nigerian paper Leadership on 21 August 2011: British Govt Detains Nigerian Couple's Six Children as to some of what happened:

Maurice went to court with snatched children's parents who have been named by the Nigerian newspaper.The children's Guardian solicitor Jonquil Houghton, apparently in league with of Haringey Council's barrister, Ms O'Donahugue, allowed several false claims before HHJ Carol Atkinson, new to the case

including:

that he was recording proceedings with a dictaphone or mobile neither of which he had in court.
Neither barrister nor solicitor corrected the judge when the judge assumed that Maurice was Paul Randle-Jolliffe who had acted as McKenzie Friend for the Musas before. [Both barrister and solicitor had acted before and had spoken to Paul numerous times in previous hearings but at 2pm deliberately told the judge, when Maurice was safely behind bars, that he was using two names to mislead the court!]
Maurice believes they did this to bar him from future hearings, because he had suggested to the judge, both lawyers stating 'the idea had never been considered', to simply 'deport' the children, not the parents, in the care of the NHS to the aircraft and allow the Nigerian authorities to take over from that point.
Maurice had also told the judge DNA tests, withheld from the parents for months, proved the six children was theirs afterall, making 'child trafficking' even more less likely
Maurice also had told the judge that the police, if that concerned with an allegation, armed with a positive opium drug result, illicit drugs inflicted on a one year old baby, would of had one or more of the parents behind bars months ago.
The drawback of this simple solution, pressed a year earlier by the parents, to send the children back to Nigeria, was that the huge 'gravy train', as Maurice calls it, would no longer be available.
Maurice suspects the UK is the only country in the world with such secrecy law to disguise this day by day fraud.

That morning, in the presence of the parents and another witness, Maurice had arrested the solicitor for 'perverting the course of justice', by misleading the court and covering up, for the past 18 months, the original spurious reasons for the snatch that, so long ago, had been proved false. What finger has this law firm raised to help the children?

Maurice was told, by the clearly annoyed Holborn police due to being duped, that police drug analysis from the baby, in June11, would have been confirmed, either way,in a matter of days vwhich is one of the3 reasons why Hornsey police refuse to release the parents' custody records, Maurice insists with, clearly, Haringey being told to shut up.

Maurice says, "either there are drugs involved or there are not----if not then send the family home NOW" and that includes daughter, feared to be now dead.

Daughter's last alleged handwriting, when the parents believed she was still alive, submitted by Haringey BUT refused to be even looked at, yet alone examined, by three or is it six judges now, is a pointer as to where the truth lies.

Death or worse is seriously now possible by examining the content of the 8th September 11 Haringey Council brief for the new judge, deliberately written to deceive: page 1, page 2 and see paragraph 17 of page 3 of this Case Summary, unless the Hornsey police have conspired in this enquiry from conception?

Incidentally, what Maurice actually indicated, on the way out of court to get the police, was that he would use his megaphone, confiscated by court officials earlier, to call the public to save the family from this room full of criminals. The plan, put off until next time now, is for him to stand in the middle of Higher Holborn road, outside the 42-49 numbered Principal Registry of the Family Division, broadcasting the appalling facts and cover up by so many lawyers/judges and police all determined to swindle large sums from the tax payer by dragging out cases with no concern for the families in a secret environment unique within Europe.

With Maurice now safely locked up in the cells of Holborn police station and his captors now having perused court documents, they soon realised the lawyers had lied.

There never was a tape recorder and together with the false documentation the barrister had just served on Her HonourJudge Atkinson and Maurice's few words as the parents's Mckenzie Friend, had caused her to swiftly vacate the court room. She soon realised, by her repeating the ICO Haringey application, would be unlawfully settled now in court if it was done on 5th. Maurice has warned that the ordered transcipts would not be complete and to prolong yet another separation of children from each other and from each parent was further crimiinal conduct.

On the Monday, 5th September, when the ICO was 'nodded' through, with neither party, the lawyers now say, privy to it, now triggers an emergency Judicial Review Application commmencing after the parents visited to 'that place' in the Strand.

Examination of served papers, at commencement of the 8th September hearing, suggest the Council, if you wish to believe it, had 'no knowledge' of the Monday, 5th September, hearing, despite being listed before a District Judge for parents with the subsequent court order for the 5th Sept hearing (Copy redacted as identifies all six kids) served on both parties, to lodge rebuttal.

Maurice has studied numerous cases riddled with sharp practices and cover-ups in both South Wales and in the RCJ, indicating the problem is endemic in the cartel of 'family law' since incidents of child abuse were taken out of the criminal courts in 1948 to be hidden in this new but lucrative medium.

He vows he will therefore now campaign to make family courts go public and the crimes committed by lawyers to be put back into the criminal courts. Ther will be some exceptions, of course and supervised recording for the applicants' immediate use and ownership is also of paramount importance. See The Secrecy of Family courts should be Lifted NOW! and Send the Musa Family back Home to Nigeria - WITH their Children!

What also is clearly outdated is the UK adversarial systerm, with no checks as to the voracity of the players, is no proper taxation of the huge bills fabricated for the tax papyer.

Here is custody record page 1 and here's page 2.

What is clear from all this shambles is that avarice has once again prevailed and Haringey should be subjected to an external police enquiry.

Punishment without Crime is an article that Ian Josephs based on his experiences, with golden rules for parents.

.......Sex Worker/Child Trafficking/Paedophelia all concluded by police but Haringey Council continue withholding the whereabouts of the six children and if they are still all alive?

UK Family Courts' Royal Charter Immunity to Prosecution used to Snatch Children for Cash

Maurice Kirk — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:05:00 GMT

"We were in court today from 9:30am and ******* renewed the Interim Care Order on the phone with Judge Hess, while we were waiting for the hearing. By 4pm we were called before Judge Berry who told us the ICO has been renewed on the phone by judge Hess.

We are still in shock of what we have experienced today 5 Sept 2011, please see below the family proceedings guideline.

If a court will breach its Rule, we have completely lost faith in family court."

Rule 28 of the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1988)

The above is part of an e-mail by a very frightened family from Nigeria who have not seen their six children for months and one for over a year.

It is rumoured they are under the so called ‘care’ of a London Borough Council.

I arrived at 10am and spent until 4pm trying to find someone in the family court building in Holborn, London to admit the case was listed!

Well, it was not listed despite the clear document created by a High Court judge when I last attended this despicable case at the Royal Courts of Justice.

I had to demand it was listed standing over the officials, all very perplexed I must say, until the court document was completed with participants signature, so recorded.

After 4pm I heard the case called and attended as McKenzie Friend. Mere nanoseconds had been set aside for the hearing with clear charged emotion shown in the face of the man in charge, as he scurried from the court.

I had listed six outstanding issues needing disclosure which were then re-written by the mother as an application. The judge would have none of it, saying it can be dealt with at the same Family Court, 42-49 Holborn this Thursday, 8^th September at 10am (and I may be there with friends,placards and megaphone, I muttered).

So off to the police station, where the parents were arrested and jailed, to demand their custody records and copy tapes of their separate interviews, under caution.

6pm at Hornsey police station, Wood Green, North London

Now, the parents of the six snatched children were purportedly arrested in St Thomas's Hospital in June and detained there for 27 hours, miles North of the river.

They were denied copy of custody records or copy tape of their interrogations, under caution......interesting, I wonder why?

So we collectively crammed ourselves into the police busy reception area, not much bigger than a couple of telephone boxes, along with many ‘signing in' on bail or desperate in trying to report crime!

Could I get their custody records? No chance! The parents had already written for them weeks ago and one police sergeant clearly took great delight in saying "Yes I need only press the computer button and it will all come spewing out but they are not getting it."

So we waited for the shift to change and a new officer ‘in charge' was again asked.....no chance. "Can I speak to the duty inspector or record, please, I need to make an appointment?" No chance.

I would be arrested, I was told, if I remained.

Outside the station I tackled some eight or more returning officers, clearly harassed and tired from a day's work. Those prepared to reply all indicated something was not quite right which visibly, at least, cheered up the frantic parents still deprived of their children.

Meantime the ‘gravy train of family lawyers' continues to milk the tax payer for millions by dragging out their respective cases......but not without letting it slip, I picked up, that some film actress or TV person the name of Collins, in East Enders, appeared to be ‘on the make'. She was making advances to acquire the children without the parent's consent, made known to her in no uncertain terms!

Now we have both Tuesday and Wednesday, to get up to some possible mischief, before the Thursday hearing.........

This blog will disclose court documents and pictures between now and the Thursday hearing together with some photos of a once happy family.

This child snatching case is being handled in exactly the same way as to what is going on with the South Wales Police bullying. Family courts are now being allowed to ignore the Rule of Law in the same way...

Extract from a conversation with another shocked observer:

When you read British Govt Detains Nigerian Couple’s Six Children, in a Nigerian National paper, published on 21 August 2011, you cannot but wonder why nobody seems to have been helping effectively. A website that attracted nearly 4,000 hits in just one month didn’t seem to help either. Only a gagging order from the Council concerned. According to experts, the worst of them all...

So why should I bother? Because I’ve now seen in Family Courts exactly what I’ve seen in South Wales: civil servants do ANYTHING to cover up any mistake, wrong-doing or crime by any of their buddies / colleagues / brethren.

After all, they are protected from immunity thanks to the Royal Charters that are being “royally” abused. What can we, the people, do but cuddle up and wait until we die? What’s the point exposing the documents they falsify, the orders that are supposed to have come from a court but never had a judge sitting? What’s the point making WANTED posters of judges, doctors and other “professionals” when nobody will ever prosecute them? Parliament is riddled with lawyers now. The MPs who are interested in white collar crimes are so few that they even face calls to resign by their colleagues. There is only one answer, it seems: we have to act according to our own nature and decide what’s worth doing...

Back to my own story related to all this and the 28th September High Court hearing in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre when 20 years of South Wales Police bullying will become evident to anyone attending ( I pay for lunch):

Here are the transcripts of what was supposedly said on 12 July 2011: