Legal Battles : South Wales Police, Prison

Racially Aggravated Threat Trial Starts Today

Maurice Kirk — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:32:00 GMT

HM Crown Prosecution are still refusing to hand over my Dr Tegwyn Williams medical records, used on the 2nd December 09, to keep me locked up. Now they affect my trial today, in Barry magistrates, see here. All the HM courts are now blocking my e-mails and I have received a letter from HM Partnership stating I am not allowed to enter any civil or criminal court in South Wales at all, without prior written consent.

Well, past invitations to court have never, actually, been a great thrill, but just how else am I expected to do my target practice now? On a machine gun range?

Leaked Police Report on MAPPA Meetings to Kill Claimant - Contrary to Basic Human Rights!?

Maurice Kirk — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:34:00 GMT

Here is just the beginning and here is my shaky speech in the House of Lords meeting, just after my lucky escape, of just why I could not divulge, last year to my family and friends, my defences when charged with a mandatory ten year minimum prison sentence or an Imprisonment for Public Protection [IPP], for life, in a High Security Psychiatric Prison........ Your comments would be greatly appreciated!

In December 09, my London solicitors had written to the police HQ, to MAPPA Co-ordinator, Nigel Rees, who confirmed MAPPA categorisation. The delay in my arrest that followed, around two weeks, was deliberate with the hope I would again make a lawful approach to the Chief Constable, thus allowing police sniper fire to do the rest. There is much video of the incident that sparked all this off. All this police activity, caught on video, but the Crown Court trial judge, Paul somebody, because it was like something out of "The Keystone Cops" blocked it from the jury, following my application for disclosure. Scenes includeded, totally out ofcontrol, 'Trojan' squad of police, armed with their own machine guns, all wearing tin hats, as I attempted mutual exchange of witness statements, in the seventeen year running civil action. This was all being acted out in the inner sanctum of Police HQ, Bridgend. Quite innappropiate for a jury, the judge considered, having already refused any other police disclosure that might further reveal his small minded cabal's ultimate intention.

News From Prison

Maurice Kirk — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:24:00 GMT

Civil Court Judge has ordered the South Wales Police to produce the 52 files for Maurice but when they eventually arrived the Prison Authorities refused to give any to him. At last, with more delay, they have allowed him access to 6 files at a time (so no cross-referencing possible) and each batch available every day or so thus meaning he has no time to prepare for his criminal case which starts 25^th Jan. He is still being denied his laptop on which he has filed evidence.

Because he has recently won a case for excessive physical restraint against Reliance, the firm employed to move prisoners from Prison to court, hospital etc, they have seen to it that he has even more restrictions placed on his visiting rights.

Civil Proceedings Lodged

Maurice Kirk — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:48:00 GMT

Maurice started his Civil Proceedings against the South Wales Police this morning in the County Court.

The Solicitors, acting for the Police, admitted in court that they had no copy of their complaint to the Police against Maurice which led to his arrest on 22^nd June. He had been accused of threatening to throw the bundle of witness exchange papers into the building, as he was not allowed in and they would not accept them.

Further, the Judge has ordered the Police to identify the police officers involved over the last 20 years in over 100 incidents where they have proof of which ones were involved.

NOTES FROM DIARY

Maurice Kirk — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:51:00 GMT

Remand Prisoner Kirk BM8473

HM Prison

Cardiff

South Wales

NOTES FROM DIARY

Tuesday 03 November 2009

CRIMINAL PROCEDURES (INSANITY) ACT 1964

0853 PO refuses to inform me whether it is police, probation or lawyer booked in for 9am for 2 hours 15 minutes. Refuses to indicate which (7) court case, which files to carry to visitors compound. ‘Until you get there cannot tell you'.

0914 Different PO states it's a psychologist from High Security Ashworth Psychiatric Hospital Liverpool. I repeat I need proper notice, proof of identity, tape recorded and/or independent witness. (All in writing to authorities on countless previous occasions)

Refuse? No.

0915 Locked up in cell. Write hurried letter to Dr?

0918 Medication called. Let out to medical orderlies - refused again, diclofenac tabs for arthritis (8^th day). Queue dominated by prisoners for either methadone and/or screaming to be sent to Caswell Clinic!

0940 Original PO refused who/why Dr from HM Ashworth?

Locked up.

SO and PO explains psychiatrist from Ashworth from Court order of 26 October (HHJ Eleri Rees)

I hand letter to SO to copy and deliver to Psychiatrist, stating I am not refusing, I require a minimum of 24 hours notice, taped, witnessed.

‘This is my 9^th psychiatrist' signed.

0952 Copied and returned.

10.30 Dr at cell with healthcare manager to ‘assess fit to plead and stand trial'.

XE on who is behind all this abuse.

Dr admits never experienced a case re ‘fit to plead' but ‘not fit to stand trial without legal representation'.

Seen explanation on my website? Dr answered (later)

Seen my medical records neither I nor my GP can get? Dr answered (later).

What law are they trying now ‘because they failed miserably on Section 35 1983 Mental Health Act? Dr answered (later)

10.50 Dr. court can say ‘not fit (no challenge of Dr William's 4 psychiatric reports or release of my medical records)

11.08 Are you fit to instruct any lawyer?

Dr promises ‘bundle of papers' from Crown Court. I explain I have had all these sort of promises from Cardiff Judges in the past and invariably ‘a pack of lies'.

I won't get it, meaning all the correspondence between Judges and CPS and Caswell Clinic and HMCS and MAPPA and Justice Ministry and other gulags in South Wales (Whitchurch and Llanarth Psychiatric Hospitals, Swansea and Cardiff Universities, where so many previous psychiatric reports originated).

I ask Dr. did you actually ask to see my medical ‘history'?

Reply ‘They could not find MJK medical records.

Dr: How did all this start?

Suggest he read my 64 page witness statement dated 19 June 09 written ‘just for an occasion as this' once I realised all the South Wales Police had left, following the signing of the Chief constable's 25 Feb 09 sworn affidavit.

Documents given to Dr.

2003 HM internal memo by Treasury Solicitors and HM Attorney General Re: Vexatious Litigant.
Caswell Clinic internal memos (also see website)
MJK 19 June 09 witness statement. For civil action Re Covert Police Surveillance
Chicago USA, Psychiatrist Report in Rebuttal (off website)

Dr: Have you ever threatened violence?

‘I was picked for public school 7 aside rugby finals at Twickenham'

Both Caswell Clinic and Cardiff Court refuse to remove falsely reported conviction of ABH on their record just as the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons in 2002, laboured under false information, again supplied by South Wales Police with ‘intent'.

I ask the Dr "where is the element of ‘intent' in my current predicament now facing an IPP prison sentence of indeterminate length for public protection?"

"For public protection or for yet another Judge, on 2 December, at last quashing my Civil Action, on 10 January 2010 and blocking the machine gun case, never ever intended to see the light of day?"

11.32 Dr leaves cell a little better informed stating he needed to return.

Every cloud?

Extract - Psychiatrist's Final Report

Maurice Kirk — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:12:00 GMT

AN EXTRACT FROM THE PSYCHIATRISTS REPORT ON MAURICE KIRK.

"Paragraph 36. I have been asked to give my mind to the issue as to whether or not Maurice Kirk is fit to plead and stand trial. Maurice Kirk clearly understands the nature of the charge and the significance of the plea. However, due to Maurice Kirk's mental disorder described above, specifically his brain damage and its relationship to self awareness, judgement, decision making, self regulation of behaviour and control of emotions, combined with difficulty in organising and sequencing information, his inability to filter out relevant information and his problems with attention and concentration, his overwhelming perception of himself as being a victim of persecution by the system, all of which are clearly evident in discussions with him concerning the alleged offence, he appears unable to address a specific legal and technical area of law necessary to appropriately conduct his defence."

"Paragraph 37. Should Maurice Kirk be legally represented in court, I would consider him a fit person to stand trial as a legal representation would be able to focus on the relevant features.

"Paragraph 38. Maurice Kirk's current clinical presentation is clearly causing major problems for the criminal justice system, though is not of a nature and degree to warrant compulsory treatment. He would, however, benefit from continued contact with mental health services to both monitor his condition and attempt to establish a relationship which would allow other treatment avenues to be explored.

"Paragraph 39. I am aware that my opinion will cause significant difficulties for the court.. I am also aware of the difficulties that the court has had gaining further psychiatric evidence which to a degree is due to Maurice Kirk's perceived ability to intimidate and threaten those who become involved in his case. Should Maurice Kirk rerquest in patient hospital treatment. I have concerns that a medium secure unit would not be able to provide the degree of procedural security necessary to maintain the safety of its staff, because of the confidentiality of other patients and the necessary security. Should the court wish a second opinion, they may wish to consider instructing a psychiatrist from a high security hospital to assess Maurice Kirk both as to treatment and the environment in which that treatment should take place. I stress that the requirement for conditions of specific security are purely as a result of Maurice Kirk's communications with the encouragement of others, rather than his clinical presentation.

"Paragraph 40. Maurice Kirk can return to court for any disposal that the court sees fit."

Press / Opinion

Pie2211 — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:01:00 GMT

update: broken link now fixed