Legal Battles : South Wales Police, HM Attorney General

'HM Partnership' overturn Maurice's £50,000 Judgment, against the HM Prison Governor, Awarded by Trial Judge

Maurice Kirk — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 07:38:00 GMT

1. In a well thought out judgment the HM District judge, Master Phillips, ruled Maurice had lost his compensation and was to pay, instead, HM £2,200 in costs but, at least, 'stayed' proceedings for three months due to the claimant's medical problems. Problems that may continue, sine die, until HM hands over his medical records for surgeon and anaesthetist.

2. The whole case had rested on HM Treasury Solicitor's barrister, today, stating no Particulars of Claim for damages, for his 2008 false imprisonment, were ever received by Cardiff prison from the HM Cardiff County Court manager, Neil Pring. Mr Pring is the very same one currently refusing Maurice the right to process his fourteen ongoing directly related court cases, at the public counter, whilst also deliberately bouncing any 'due process' via court e-mail addresses. Remember, Mr Pring, instigated by HM Attorney-General [see leaked HM internal memos], back in 2002/3, had gathered up, now under the HM Treasury Solicitor's specific orders, all of Maurice's past and present court files for Whitehall scrutiny, despite a success rate of 80% in the fifty odd cases. HM judges wanted to ban him from any civil court, either in England or Wales unless he was represented by a lawyer. A rare move purely to certify him as a Vexatious Litigant. Obtaining the services of a trustworthy lawyer had always been the heart of the problem.

3. Maurice insisted he had paid HM, on 20th April 2009, for service on both Defendants, Ms West, the then Governor of Cardiff prison, just days before their 8th June, MAPPA meeting where her probation/prison representative(s) were then sitting around the table, at their cosy Bridgend police HQ with other MAPPA key players, such as senior police and NHS doctor, Tegwyn Williams and Social Services, Elizabeth Paul, both of special South Wales Police forensic unit, Caswell Psychiatric Prison.

4. The 1st Defendant, in this, the 5th Action against police, was the Chief Constable. She had always admitted court service, on 20th April and had immediately proceeded with voluminous defence, by Dolman's solitors, both in court and directly to Maurice, now detained in HM Cardiff prison. He remained there until his 11th February 2010 acquittal for trading in 'prohibited weapons and ammunition' whilst attempting, Dolmans, solicitors, would say, by 'mutual exchange' of witness statements through their front window. Maurice was still a little upset, apparently, as to the way the Chief Constable had continued to deny, by sworn affidavit, any knowledge of some of his successful Barry magistrates cases and of her officers having broken into his surgery, all matters within some hundred or so incident numbered conflicts with the South Wales police.

5. In June 09 Maurice had applied for a Default Judgment, by letter and had the completed HM form returned from prison to the court. Maurice also raised the whole issue before His Honour Judge Seys Llewelyn QC, in July, following HM Prison having refused his presence at an earlier court and earlier, still, before HHJ N Cooke QC on a routine bail application. Both these judges would have known, of course, about Maurice's MAPPA terrorist level 3 status with HM prison monitoring all of Maurice's visitors, telephone calls and letters to and from the County Court and opening his solicitors.

6. At the 8th June MAPPA meeting HM considered it likely that Maurice would be shot when next attempting to 'exchange' witness statements. It was now his seventeenth year in this long running civil action, repeatedly being refused a Trial by Jury originally promised, originating from when Barry police, on 27th November 1992, had first refused to apprehend or even interview the named likely arsonists who had burnt out his garage at his home in Barry.

7. The garage had hangared his WW2 piper cub (not insured) and also full of his and his father's extensive collection of rare veterinary antique books and equipment (see exhibit, in 4th Action and ITV News video). Maurice was, instead, grilled at the police station by the officer in command, as if he had burnt out his cub to claim on insurance. Police harassment, originating from the 70s, in Somerset, was clearly, again, rearing its ugly head.

8. This time, Maurice was not going to just 'move out of the area', as he had always done before, this time he was going to take a stand and fight them, legally represented, through the civil courts.

9. In the 2009 MAPPA minutes, under the control of Nigel Rees, MAPPA Co-ordinator, reveal Maurice received a majority consent for 'special treatment' with Dr Tegwyn Williams allocated the task, by whatever means, to obtain Barbara Wilding's desire for a 'final solution', Maurice's Broadmoor imprisonment, of 'indeterminate length', IPP, having failed in her opportunity, when deliberately delaying Maurice's arrest for a few weeks, in having him shot.

10. Quotes from 8th Oct 2010 County Court Judgment

P 5 para 23 'The evidence of the 2nd Defendant is that they have no record of having received any correspondence from the court for the period April until October 09 in relation to the proceedings issued by Mr Kirk'.......

P5 para 26 'I accept the evidence of Mr Booty (current HM Governor) that the prison had no record of the prison having received any correspondence from the court for the relevant period. I cannot accept that if the proceedings had been served they would simply have been ignored'.

P 5 para 27 'I do not suggest it is necessary (as Mr Kirk suggests) for there to be an affidavit sworn by the previous governor. He or she will simply repeat the procedures in place in dealing and processing of incoming mail at the prison and that aspect is dealt with in detail in Mr Booty's statement'.

11. In around November 09, when Maurice received the £50,000 Judgment pushed under his prison cell door, immediately arranged, by application to HM Governor's representatives for the distribution of tobacco for all hundred odd inmates on his prison wing.

12. While Maurice cannot commence Court of Appeal proceedings, owing to the Order to 'stay' proceedings, he was just been contacted by the court, mid English Channel, too far out to jump off and swim back to Brittany, where he had gone in search of ten year old police custody videos and tapes. These included the one of police smashing their way into his daughter's car to arrest him, whilst stuck in stationary Cardiff traffic and, later, knocking him about in the cell of the police station.

13. Cardiff court told him that the anxiously awaited judgment, scheduled for Monday, 11th October, as to whether MAPPA meetings summaries will be disclosed or not, was now adjourned to possibly, Friday, 15th October.

Racially Aggravated Threat Trial Starts Today

Maurice Kirk — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:32:00 GMT

HM Crown Prosecution are still refusing to hand over my Dr Tegwyn Williams medical records, used on the 2nd December 09, to keep me locked up. Now they affect my trial today, in Barry magistrates, see here. All the HM courts are now blocking my e-mails and I have received a letter from HM Partnership stating I am not allowed to enter any civil or criminal court in South Wales at all, without prior written consent.

Well, past invitations to court have never, actually, been a great thrill, but just how else am I expected to do my target practice now? On a machine gun range?

Leaked Police Report on MAPPA Meetings to Kill Claimant - Contrary to Basic Human Rights!?

Maurice Kirk — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:34:00 GMT

Here is just the beginning and here is my shaky speech in the House of Lords meeting, just after my lucky escape, of just why I could not divulge, last year to my family and friends, my defences when charged with a mandatory ten year minimum prison sentence or an Imprisonment for Public Protection [IPP], for life, in a High Security Psychiatric Prison........ Your comments would be greatly appreciated!

In December 09, my London solicitors had written to the police HQ, to MAPPA Co-ordinator, Nigel Rees, who confirmed MAPPA categorisation. The delay in my arrest that followed, around two weeks, was deliberate with the hope I would again make a lawful approach to the Chief Constable, thus allowing police sniper fire to do the rest. There is much video of the incident that sparked all this off. All this police activity, caught on video, but the Crown Court trial judge, Paul somebody, because it was like something out of "The Keystone Cops" blocked it from the jury, following my application for disclosure. Scenes includeded, totally out ofcontrol, 'Trojan' squad of police, armed with their own machine guns, all wearing tin hats, as I attempted mutual exchange of witness statements, in the seventeen year running civil action. This was all being acted out in the inner sanctum of Police HQ, Bridgend. Quite innappropiate for a jury, the judge considered, having already refused any other police disclosure that might further reveal his small minded cabal's ultimate intention.

House of Lords May Meeting on the British Judiciary Brought Forward

Maurice Kirk — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:01:00 GMT

Attention everyone, the meeting has been brought forward due to over subscription needing a larger committee room. Contact organisers or me for details.

1966 Veterinary Surgeons Act is admitted to be contrary to the European Convention of Human Rights. 1967 Royal Charter, imparting college immunity to prosecution, many also deem to be 'ultra vires' and should therefore go back before Their Lordships of HM Privy Council. Meanwhile, the college even refuses to 'convene a court', contrary to 2004 Statutory Instrument, to allow Maurice Kirk BVSc to 'practice veterinary surgery'. Finding any lawyer to do any of this, of course, is quite another story!

The European Court has warned Maurice it will refuse any further application relating to this Royal Charter or continuing conduct of the RCVS. This coincided with Her Majesty's Attorney General applying to have all his court files confiscated from the Western Circuit with the view of having him certified as a 'Vexatious Litigant'.

The RCVS obtained an Extended Civil Restraint Order to smother the truth. He is banned from the Cardiff County Court building, having served seven months in jail only to be aquitted, not even having tendered a defence.

See Downloads

Banned for Life as a Veterinary Surgeon

Maurice Kirk — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:14:00 GMT

Another 2 year Extended Civil Restraint Order handed down preventing any further Applications to the RCVS, with the threat of a Contempt of Court Indictment if I do.

My Appeal to Court of Appeal will re-iterate the law stating the RCVS must convene a public court to hear my application to practice veterinary surgery.

A witness statement setting down the conspiracy facts between the South Wales Police and College is on 'Most Recent Downloads' with a lot more to follow.

B2/2006/2307, CO/734/2005, CO/54/95/2006 CO/8751/2007, CO/2006/1602, CO/397/2009

Dolmans, Solicitors
Windsor Place
Cardiff.

17^th June 2009

Maurice Kirk v South Wale Police

1^st Action BS6141159‐MC65 delayed by Mr Justice Andrew Collins

2^nd Action CF101741 delayed by Mr Justice Andrew Collins

3^rd Action CF204141 delayed by Mr Justice Andrew Collins

4^th Action 7CF7345 delayed by police failed disclosure

5^th Action 8CF02269 delayed by His Honour Judge Chambers QC

6^th Action 9CF02983 delayed by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

7^th Action CO/397/ 2009 delayed by Mr Justice Goudie QC

Outstanding Witness Statements

‘Hairy Students'

Dear Mr Oliver,

Mr Justice Goodie QC and your client's ‘hairy students', as they so described themselves when approached by Patrick Cullinane Esq., all strategically positioned around Court 6 of the Royal Courts of Justice this week, know or should know the matters to which you now refer in your letters of 17^th Dec 2007 and yesterday, pretending to seek specific disclosure as they are currently in your possession [Action 3. 8.26].

You know police sergeant Rowe was seen wielding a sledge hammer while other police with crow bars broke into my veterinary surgery in Ely, Cardiff, during June 1995. Eight surgery break-ins I suffered and your Sgt Runnalls in Cardiff Crown Court denied every one of them telling the jury each incident, at the Llantwit surgery, had been ‘criminal damage' not a ‘burglary', [God forbid, it could put off the tourists].

And why was Sgt Rowe smashing his way into my building without first contacting me with the key, Mr Oliver? They told you in order to put back into my overhead flat a drug dealer, then shacked up with an Alison Jenner, a daughter of a police Inspector he being a long time client of mine. Read the police statements again that Goodie J predictably declined and ask yourself just why Wilding had to bury the incidents and Goodie had to quash any chance of an adjournment blocking any further legal process for discovery of documents by handing me down a two year ban using an Extended Civil Restraint Order. The police about the court in plain clothes may consider wearing white coats next time as I may feel more at home.

All this evidence and more has already been given to you relating to this incident highlighted in my 4^th October 08 letter, yet another to Barbara Wilding, Chief of South Wales Police, listing well over 40 police incidents caused by the police surveillance team specifically assigned by her predecessor to follow me.

These 40 odd incidents were relevant to Mr Justice Goodie QC as well, relating to the gaggle of lawyers representing the Royal College, but I could not disclose them to him without your client first being forced to admit that they existed and I was swindled. As for HM Attorney General, currently five years into attempting to have me certified, he did not even bother to send representation. She was needed to answer to the content of the leaked HM internal memos between HM Treasury Solicitor and Cardiff court staff and other seemingly undesirable trysts featuring in this seventeen year running litigation. An ECRO is a poor second to being certified as a Vexatious Litigant, but will at least block my lawful right to have Section 31 disclosure of conspiracy between the RCVS and the South Wales Police.

The 10 years of unrelenting police harassment I have suffered until, of course, they had me struck off the veterinary register, is compounded by your client's continuing refusal to disclose, contrary to the Fraud Act, causing my 7^th Application now, to rejoin my family's profession, to have been refused awarding £7,000 costs for the purported expense for a brief hearing and the photocopying of the same court documents from my previous application before Mr Justice Lloyd Jones in June 2008. That case is still smoldering somewhere in the Court of Appeal, smoldering because statute law states the college must convene a public hearing for my application to work and refuse for fear of previously withheld evidence, as with you, coming to the notice of the veterinary profession and tax payer.

I have again been refused a public hearing, contrary to 1966 Veterinary Surgeons Act, 2004 rules on procedure and 1415 Magna Carta, the decision having been taken by some girl, I'm told, sitting alone in some gloomy back room of the college's head quarters in Horseferry Road, London.

Despite my 2008 Abuse of Process Application, granted by Mr Nicholas Chambers QC, leading to Ms Wildings falsely sworn 25th February 2009 affidavit, denying court cases and police incidents ever occurred, you have the apparent audacity to delay, yet again, when you know, full well, I was arrested and charged, your client continuing to pretend these 40 odd police occurrence numbers are purely a figment of my imagination? I need a substantive reply to my 4^th Oct 2008 request in order to assist your enquiry. Blackmailing me with the same threats as before is to be expected bearing in mind the law is only as good as the integrity of those entrusted to administer it.

Are you therefore seeking a further 2 weeks to exchange witness statements?

Both Mr Justice Goodie QC and your client's myriad of lawyers present witnessed as to just why I raised these matters before the High Court my doing it to obtain yet another pretence letter from you stating your client still has no knowledge of the 40 police incidents listed in my 4^th October 2008 application for disclosure, being some from a hundred or more similarly drafted letters my secretary will confirm she typed over many years whilst in my employ.

Your ‘systemic risk' taking to the whole legal industry may come to fruition, as it has done with Penningtons for the RCVS, ridiculing the good name of the veterinary profession.

I need our trial judge, His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC to read Monday's transcript but far more importantly, the UK tax payer to hear it and to consider your proposed conduct before embarking on your lucrative 6 month Trial without a Jury needing well over 200 hundred witnesses not all yet disclosed.

One of my various secretaries, over the years, only yesterday reminded me that she would arrive at my surgery each morning only to ask, "What new police incidents do we have today to record?" We would then set about gathering evidence for the latest criminal court pantomime or current JR nonsense between a castration and retained afterbirth, no doubt. Retention of police records by the police was my secretary's paramount policy, writing, telephoning all and sundry. Incident numbers, custody records and where necessary, attending court herself when I have been locked up over night.

One such case, your client still refuses to fully disclose, was Action 3 paragraph 2.1 where she witnessed, from the public gallery, my asking, hemmed in by prison officers, just why was I in prison?

Both Jackie Seals, prosecuting and the clerk of the court refused to disclose any information on the matter, saying later there were no documents as to why, but instructed the Magistrates, also none the wiser, I assume, to order my immediate release with no apology or bail conditions.

Jackie Seals again refused even to tell His Honour Judge Gaskell, in one of my earlier Abuse of Process Applications, as to why I had been arrested, jailed and kicked out the door by your client.

She went further, having been silent in Magistrates, saying, before the Crown Court, she refused to answer my questions as my witness, "for fear of incriminating myself". Counsel for your client, the South Wales Police was made to admit to Judge Gaskell I had been arrested for refusing to leave the Vale of Glamorgan Agricultural Show where I had been Honorary Veterinary Surgeon for most of the day. The arrest, he admitted, was for Breach of the Peace and nothing else.

The RCVS struck me off for it, for life, it appears, now Mr Justice Goodie QC has refused to grant a Judicial Review, while the college's thoroughly deceitful lawyers keep the cash, originally awarded £66.000 costs by HM Privy Council, £12,000 by Mr Justice McComb and your client's HM Crown Prosecution Service, also immune to any ‘accountability', awarded £11,000 by Mr Justice Griffiths Williams who was performing, incidentally, in the court next door to Patrick and myself, on Monday.

It stinks, Mr Oliver, doesn't it?

I was therefore at Barry magistrates yesterday putting the finishing touches on my private criminal prosecution of both you and Ms Wilding, my intention being to produce tape recordings, gathered over the years depicting, in particular, the demeanor of presiding judges when I have dared to suggest that lawyers and police in UK courtrooms have a signed and sealed arrangement to act with impunity should any past indiscretion come to the surface of their gutter during any subsequent court proceedings. It was drawn up by The Law Society and called The Memorandum of Understanding to support the already existing HM Partnership.

There I had a chance meeting of the original lawyer in Cardiff Magistrates, Action 3 Para 5.1, my having been ordered by the police to produce motoring insurance for the 35^th time. I refused winning the case including the 7^th time police had stopped me as a banned driver only to be proved they knew I was not.

My secretary yesterday, when told of our meeting, remembered my showing the court my driving licence, pressed up against the prison glass for all in court to see, my being imprisoned overnight for "having no driving licence"!

I have a set of hand cuffs and I will be around to your offices later this week.

Yours

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copy Court of Appeal & http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/