Legal Battles : Professor Roger Wood

Machine-Gun Trial Blocked Again by HHJ Seys Llewelyn QC

Maurice Kirk — Sat, 13 Aug 2016 05:31:00 GMT

South Wales Police may, again, be responsible for blocking my Wordpress site to be up dated so to my Facebook as it is to be moved outside UK Jurisdiction

Just What Really Goes On in Our Courts

Maurice Kirk — Sat, 12 Oct 2013 11:30:00 GMT

21.34 hrs and I am still holding......

21. 25 hrs I ring South Wales Police101 number again as I am far from happy with Roger's 'advice' (advice I must say appropriate for the sort of calls I can imagine he is swamped with every night). I am asked to hold...but not before suggesting it takes only one phone to arrange for the doctor's house to be burnt down to address the minds of those ultimately responsible for what they have done to both my family and my life.....

21.07 hrs I ring Roger Davies on police 101 number re advice: Do I go to court on 16th or go to a long overdue Bristol psychiatrist appointment to get brain scan and establish once and for all ...do I have a brain tumour or not?...... if not I can have my cancelled CAA medical restored to allow me to fly in the cub to South Africa.

13th October

13 05.10hrs

No one seems to be listening around here so it means writing another laborious letter to inform the world just what really goes on in our UK law courts:

Clerk to the Cardiff Crown Court BS614159/T20130801 13^th Oct 2013

Dear Madam,

Regina v Maurice John Kirk (Kirk v South Wales Police) Further to my e-mail seeking advise as to which 16^th October 13 appointment I take, my preferring the psychiatrist’s appointment as I have waited for over four years, I find there are still several Crown Court appeals and other outstanding issues relevant to the trial listed on 12^th November 13.

1. My 12^thApril 2013 appeal application (Case 62120007323) filed with the magistrates remains ignored despite reminders and despite my sixtieth odd Judicial Review Application paid for and posted.

This is a residual matter from the 25^th January 2010 jury trial, re my trading in machine guns. The fact that I was acquitted meant the South Wales Police, with malice afore thought, continue to refuse to return my property confiscated during their 22^nd June 2009 dawn raid, brandishing automatic weapons.

The truth of the matter was they simply wanted me jailed for anything to affect my current ongoing twenty year running civil trial and even attempted to snatch our ten year old daughter under Operation ‘Orchid’ to further undermine my, then, already fragile state of mind..

2. Money for fifteen further court cases

As my purloined collection of antiques and shot guns exceeded an estimated £10,000 in value may I apply for the residing Crown Court judge to order the immediate release of said property that I may dispense with the need of my applying for Legal Aid and delay the police may cause? District Judge Bodfan Jenkins continues to refuse to state a case for delayed JR.

3. My appeal for 'common assault' conviction from arresting a mischievous Cardiff barrister, attempting to pervert the course of justice yet again, needs to be listed for an early hearing except another hearing before that is needed, outside Wales, like last time, because this individual has, at this late stage, now employed another barrister, at tax payer’s expense, stating he does not like the thought of my cross examining him again.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/13%2009%2024%20CPS%20Complainant%20Appl.png

4. He is, of course, the Crown Prosecution lawyer who cross examined me in the past but is now fearful that my reason for his arrest may be disclosed to the general public. On 1^st December 2011 this complainant, David Gareth Evans of 9 Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, was and still is, despite my years of countless applications for disclosure, privy to the content of court and cell CCTV, police, court and custody records that will clear my name to successfully apply to become a veterinary surgeon.

5. Most important is the fact that both he and His Honour Judge Richard Thomlow have access to the Cardiff Crown Prosecution computer that produced the draft version my ten witnesses all watched District Judge John Charles scribble all over before ordering it be shown to me in the cells for my approval. 6. The 4^thMay12 jury, during my ‘Breach of a Restraining Order’ hearing, was, just like myself, refused sight of any of the above public records simply because Luigi Stranati, court manager, had not transferred the case to England as I had previously requested. When it suits the CPS, I notice, it is transferred to England like with the last two cases so similarly constructed. 7. That 4th May12 jury requested information that was all destroyed and will only be confirmed by, 'on who's orders', from David Gareth Evans if he is on oath but only if he is cross examined by myself.

6 and 7 seem to have been removed to protect that nice doctor who was so wise in his diagnosis and report about M's brain...

8. He knows I NEVER EVER WAS SERVED THE RESTRAINING ORDER, to possibly breach about three days later, by anyone that day as it was arranged by the then Recorder of Cardiff, His Honour Judge Llewellyn Jones QC, on 14^th November 2011 for a longer prison term (see clerk of court notes and High Court Order) with the usual intention for the prison to serve it upon my release.

9. But ‘the fearful sight of ten outsiders in the public gallery’ and Strinati sneaking in was just too much for the district judge who significantly shortened my prison sentence sufficiently enough for my immediate release.

11 11 14 Cardiff High Court Acting Recorder of Cardiff Witheld Orders.pdf

10. Release for only twenty minutes, I hasten to add, before the next trumpeted up South Wales Police conspiracy unfolded and my arrest for ‘Failure to attend court’.

11. Just two days earlier, with me in prison, the Nigerian Musa family’s corrupt Kilburn High Street solicitors hearing succeeded as without my evidence they had buried the truth of their unlawful arranging of Tottenham police arresting both them and myself.

12 Similarly iniquitous conduct, months earlier, by the Haringey Council’s huge lawyer team, had me gaoled from the High Court to further aid their lucrative snatching of the six Nigerian children.

13. Mr Evans also knows, full well, that had John Charles allowed me to have cross examined the rogue police psychiatrist, under exemptions under the 1998 Harassment Act in the first place, in November11 and again by His Honour Judge Hughes refusing me in 1st March12 appeal of the conviction, none of these cases mentioned in this letter, today, needed to have been outstanding AND that includes my stayed civil police harassment trial BS614159

14. The police refusing to allow Newport office to issue me with a new passport, this week, my having previously had my current one unlawfully confiscated by the Defendant in my civil claims is just power for the couse for an Englishman in Cardiff.

15. Legal Aid is still not processed as Luigi Stranati still refuses my right, even on the telephone, to try and clarifying the Legal Aid queries my Bristol solicitors received when they gave up with the Welsh court. wishing no disrespect to the presiding judge my health, with or without a psychiatric examination, will affect whether I can even speak in any further court rooms as my only legal commitment is, I submit, to attend and not necessarily need to speak

16. Disclosure applications for information controlled by David Gareth Evans, CPS and the police, still need to be re addressed for both the outstanding appeal and this imminent trial.

17. I propose asking for a number of witness summonses to be served and as their subsequent counter measures will be both lengthy and expensive, may I suggest that both primary and Section 8 disclosure be ordered within seven days in the light of their refusal in disclosing my interview DVD and depositions from the last aborted trial.

18. I was entitled to all this from the very start and with a pragmatic expeditious process just as it was in all my three previously successful occasions in Bristol Crown Court concerning completely unrelated criminal allegations.

19. To reduce the number of appeals envisaged, following successful service of summonses on hostile defence witnesses and to counter this deliberate delay of my civil claims are you able, as a criminal court order independent arbitration because, while I still breath, there will be many more malicious prosecutions ahead?

20. Police withheld disclosure of CCTV,telephone and computer records created by the two complainants, Mark Davenport and Nathan Kingsley, before, during and after, alleged assault and subsequent 'intimidation of a witness' alleged incidents need addressing as the police already have mine and will not disclose as unlawful MAPPA level 3 24/7 surveillance continues here in South Wales.

21. I have been denied access in the past to this court room to give evidence, as last time, on precisely these very same issues when raised but, as usual, blocked by 'dark forces', 'the powers that be' that pullute society today.

22. The time before that, on 2nd December 2009, the CPS barrister, Richard Thomlow, also of 9 Park Place Chambers, supported the police psychiatrist in the conspiracy to strike out my current suspended civil case, BS614159, by applying for my being incarcerated in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital for life. (see enclosed 16th October 2009 REDACTED police/Caswell Clinic psychiatric report).

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

23. Barbara Wilding, past Chief Constable, had failed earlier in having me shot on 18th June 2009 but only because there were far too many CCTV cameras and armed police in attendance, inside police HQ, to cover it all up an unlawful killing.

24. The South Wales Police have ‘proof of innocence’ and evidence of complainants lying for material gain but, as usual in my criminal cases are, not always so minded in telling any one. His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC has indicated I may apply through his civil court in order that I may get access to my legal papers and clothes in my flat but the police strenuously oppose it.

25. I humbly submit that only the Cardiff Crown Court can vary the bail restrictions following twelve police officers threatening to arrest my daughter's Bristol based bailiff carrying out his lawful duties in eviction of the said squatters.

26. I declined His Honour's offer as I was aware of legal proceedings had already commenced from England. Luigi Stranati would have again 'burnt the mid night oil' in blocking any new judicial process of mine especially as the Cardiff Cabal appears to have over reached itself this time.

3 09 16 GBH on Bailiff.pdf 3 09 16 GBH on Bailiff.pdf

27. The police continue to oppose my having a passport as it is a potential threat, not just to retrieve my papers in Brittany but to their incestuous little world of money making, generally at the expense of the UK tax payer. My visit to France, to find a lawyer, may also lead to the ordering from London that Luigi Stranati allow me access to public court counters in order to process my Legal Aid application papers to expedite outstanding litigation including the machine gun/MAPPA/NHS (Wales) conspiracy implicating so many in both the judiciary and executive of The Principality.

28. Dolmans, Cardiff solicitors, have acted for all the Chief Constables in my twenty year running civil damages claim, for relentless police bullying and malicious prosecutions and in particular over the 'machine gun' case advising over IAG and MAPPA meetings and PII/MAPPA disclosure opposition, in the civil court, once I was acquitted of trading in WW1 machine guns bolted to display aircraft. Not only was the process of my being sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act ultra vires, with immunity given to the rogue police psychiatrist, the continuing bullying throughout the four month civil trial I consider as a criminal act with intent to pervert the course of justice.

29. Today I am told by two witnesses from 5^th May 2012 Crown Court public gallery that, following the jury passing a written note to the trial judge, in my absence, with regards to CCTV, court or custody records being in existance with the recording of the alleged service of a ‘restraining order’ on me in the cells, CPS barrister David Gareth Evans was heard to deliberately misinform the jury to obtain a conviction. 30. I make application to listen to the court tapes, for both the outstanding Evans appeal and 12^th November proposed trial, see original documentary evidence of service, under the laws of best evidence, purported to recorded in both 1^st December 2011 GEOamey custody records as well as magistrate court clerk Michael Williams’contemporaneous , as all previous requests have always been refused.

Seventeen arrests since and without a single successful conviction causes me to wonder whether anarchy really does reign supreme here in South Wales.

I remain Your Obedient Servant,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copy to County Court & CCRC

12th October

13 05.10hrs

No one seems to be listening around here so it means writing another laborious letter to inform the world just what really goes on in our UK law courts:

11th Oct 13 11.36hrs

My letter to Cardiff Crown & County Courts16th October 13 Crown Court Hearing for Pleadings

This date clashes with court ordered Bristol psychiatric examination of me and speaking on Bristol radio, my being just another South Wales Police MAPPA victim subjected to their relentless bullying.

1. To which appointment, please, do I attend?

2. Just who has the power, in Wales, to order area HMC&TS court manager, Luigi Stranati, to allow me to process a Legal aid application at Cardiff Magistrates court public counter when I have been banned by him from all South Wales court counters since 2008?

3. Just who has the power to make the rogue Cardiff police psychiatrist to hand over the evidence, written albeit under MAPPA blackmail, that is denying me my CAA pilot's licence in order to by Solid Savings" mce_href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/10/05/anarchy-breaks-out-in-wales-society-without-government-or-law.aspx">compete in the Schneider Trophy Race and now fly to South Africa?

4. Just who has the power when I am purported to be diagnosed with both 'significant brain damage' and a possible brain tumour, when confirmed by HM Crown Prosecution Service in 2nd December 2009 Crown Court hearing, over some matter about my trading in machine guns and to be sectioned to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Hospital? Neither doctor nor barrister, Your Ladyship and Your Honour, had the relevant qualifications and were both lying with intent to pervert the course of justice.

5. Just who has the power to make the South Wales Police hand back my passport, currently unlawfully withheld, following their blocking HM Newport Passport Office from issuing me with another to obtain legal papers from France?

6.Just who has the power to make the South Wales Police hand over evidence requested by 4th May 2012 jury (Breach of Restraining Order) indicated in their succinct note to His Honour Judge John Curran QC, unbeknown to me, if not your local Masonic lodge?

7. A similar jury note is likely to be repeated on12th November 2013 so who has the power then, in Wales, to order the South Wales Police to disclose my police/court/prison custody records, clerk of the court records and CCTV, both recorded at incidents and whilst I was in custody, not forgetting the numerous interview, under caution, DVDs denied me on so many previous occasions?

Thankyou

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

10th October 0.600 hrs

Tim and myself are up bright and early, in a valley deep into West Devon , to harvest his first crop of Pinot Noir and Solaris grapes.

(Faulty camera is preventing me from down loading a record of the day's activities)

Here is a photo Tim took earlier before the dreaded Botritis blighted the his hard work.......Next year we will have many, many grapes to press with our big feet! (see previous blogs)

Maurice Jailed Three Times in a Week Fourth Break in & Accused of Fraud

Maurice Kirk — Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:11:00 GMT

On 20th July 2013 I am just released after another night in police cells because of liar, MARK DAVENPORT, ringing police to block my getting into the flat for my legal papers required for the final day of my twenty year running damages claim against the South Wales Police.

4th Break-in and theft (16th July 13)

3rd break in and theft (1st June 13)

After an hour in Cardiff Magistrates, before proper Cardiff magistrates for a change and not the usual District Judges, John Charles or Bodfan Jenkins, fundamental issues with the help of the Clerk of the Court were sorted out.

But DAVENPORT had switched off the electric and had changed the locks whilst employing staff who were drawing the dole to help him allow fly tipping on my land.

After I had heard the usual evasion of the truth and shouts of almost, "liar, liar, your pants are on fire", Her Majesty's Representative, as prosecutor believed be also from 9 Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, eventually was made to release, albeit far too late, my custody record including the video made under caution that will knock this new bit of trumped up nonsense right on the head.

Yes, Mr Kirk must be allowed to live at the flat, the court heard and what of the squatter in the shop below, was my reply?

At the end of proceedings I felt it only appropriate to recommend that the Madam Clerk of the Court to be o0ffered a position as an inquisitional judge, as under the laws of Code Napoleon in a court somewhere in Brittany.

Whilst the Cardiff Cabal continues to protect the rogue police doctor and the courts appearing protect the other ring leaders behind my twenty years of purgatory whilst resisting both extreme and unusual irregularities from those in positions of privilege the Cardiff courts will continue to have my most undivided attention.

Her Majesty's representative again misled the court concerning the outstanding matter of the rogue police psychiatrist.

The Caswell Clinic psychiatrist and his Cardiff Cabal are still maintaining, three years on from the MAPPA level 3 'machine gun' acquittal, that their victim is still 'medically unfit to plead or stand trial' when it so suits but not when circumstances are not helpful for them (see The Times On Line' comment below).

Meanwhile I remain diagnosed with 'irreversible significant brain damage' and possibly cancer that caused the current Defendant, in these current civil proceedings, on 2nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, to recommend, via barrister Richard Thomlow of 9 Park Place Chambers , Cardiff, to recommend that I be incarcerated in High Security Psychiatric Hospital most likely for life.

NHS (Wales), at Caswell Clinic, are reliant on not just a brain scan interpreted by someone without the appropriate qualifications after using the wrong techniques but on its supporting documentation for the Cardiff court stating I have significant brain damage because:

1. I had been an old drinking partner of actor, Oliver Reed Esq

2. I had ditched my WW2 aircraft in the Caribbean and

3. had flown all the way to Australia without a map

(Extracted from 18th Sept 2009 supporting report by Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University e-mailed to Dr Ruth Bagshaw of Caswell Clinic prison all of which, so far, is accepted by eleven Cardiff judges)

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

This continuing bullying by the police and causing false imprisonments, just as with their refusing to release of my own 5 page victim statement following complaint, last year, by this same Caswell Clinic psychiatrist having had me locked up in prison for weeks following his latest fanciful delusions that I had been around to his home and harassed both he and a DR JANIS HILLIER I have never even met.

The release of these 13th July 13 custody records together with the video record of my 'Defence Statement', in rebuttal to an allegation of two common assaults on DAVENPORT and another, are needed as exhibits inTuesday's County Court hearing before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC on the final day of the first three of seven damages claims listed soon for a hearing.

On that 13th July 13 I was arrested by a PC Charles......"Any relation?", I asked the court.

And by 7.30pm on 19th July I am again arrested and with hand cuffs behind my back hauled into a police car with not even the right to have a road side breath test. Hang on here, I said, it was I that asked for police officers to attend this time!

I was also arrested just a few weeks ago whilst quietly parked on private property, on the pretext of 'drink drive' but with no moving traffic offence as their excuse.

In both these 'drink drive' incidents there was significant delay for over one hour before having to provide a specimen of breath!

The 2nd delay was one hour and thirty five minutes and was deliberate for senior officers, no doubt, to be contacted to set up another conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Remember, please, the numerous police incidents in the three current claims for damages contain three road side incidents recording positive specimen of breath taken but all zero within one hour of my arrests.

POLICE IGNORE MY COMPLAINT OF UNLAWFUL FLY TIPPING BY MARK DAVENPORT

Before

After

I am now told MARK DAVENPORT had reported me to police for fraudulently drawing up a falsely represented lease causing the severe banging on my door to occur recently and my camera to recording from my window, a 'paddy wagon' sitting patiently outside following my subsequent arrest.

Despite my repeated visits to Ely, Fairwater and Barry police stations, in an attempt to establish just what is going on and to file a statement of complaint, I am ignored.

Paranoia? Deja Vu?

175 Attempted Arrest for Fraud.docx

On Tuesday at 10.30am, in The Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, the police may need to attempt to explain away not just how on getting a positive road side breath test and back at the police station my sample of breath was zero on the definitive test but how was it my specimen of breath on the 19th July was zero when a pocket book entry should have recorded I was drinking from a wine bottle at the time of my arrest

E-MAIL TO MAGISTRATES

Maurice Kirk

13:45 (0 minutes ago)

to Cardiff.crn.cm2

Further to my suggestion of putting the sledge hammer down and using my car to break in instead......trust me, that is what I will do if the court does not immediately take appropriate action on the police in preventing my visiting the premises and the squatter, Davenport, for switching off my electricity supply, changing the lock and allowing illegal fly tipping on my land.

Be so good, please, as to inform the 19h July 13 three lay magistrates and lady clerk of the court of the current situation, also summarised on my current blog:

THE LAW AND WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT

Smart v The Forensic Science Service Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 783 (02 July 2013).mht

The Cardiff judges have decided to protect the corrupt NHS (Wales) administration who , in turn, on mass. are protecting two doctors pleading 'off sick' at YOUR expense for well over a year now so neither can be summonsed to the Kirk v south Wales Police final hearing on Tuesday to explain their employment by MAPPA and NHS (Wales) following The then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, having failed in having me shot MAPPA level 3v victim in June 2009 when a police helicopter and Operation Orchid failed to snatch our 10 year old daughter.. Her ordering that the machine gun be painted a different colour, to fool the jury was known by the trial judge.......a further indication aod just what rwally goes on in our UK courts and one near you.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/_A300_100_2C00_000-Machine-Gun-Reward.aspx

I AM ENTITLED TO A REMEDY FOLLOWING THIS DOCTOR REPEATEDLY FALSIFYING EVIDENCE BEFORE CARDIFF CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURTS AND ALWAYS PROTECTED BY SOUTH WALES POLICE WITH THEIR OWN EVIL AGENDA

DO COME ALONG TO THE TUESDAY COURT HEARING AND LEARN A LOT LOT MORE

My Telephone number:: 07907937953

My e-mail address: m aurice@kirkflyingvet.com

AND after

Test fly ( preferably with wings on)

And then test fly G-KURK to South Africa!

(Waiting at the northern most aerodrome in Japan, for two weeks, waiting for a 30 knot tail wind to get Liberty Girl to Alaska)

Not forgetting petition to be handed in on Friday, in Downing Street, re Snatched Children Petition like South Wales Police Operation Orchid on our 10 year old daughter:

http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/2013/07/21/maurice-gagged-the-unique-legal-weapon-in-uk-secret-family-courts/

13 07 22 Mr M Murphy 3^rd Witness Statement

Statement of Truth

22^nd July 2013

I, Michael Murphy of The Old Police Station, Barry, confirm that the content of this, my statement, is true to the best of my belief.

Back in the mid 90s Mr Kirk had flown over my scrap yard, situated next to Barry harbour to identify his car lying there and then reported me to the police for theft.

A neighbour had previously arranged to have Mr Kirk’s car towed off private land to the rear of his veterinary hospital in Tynewydd Road, Barry and onto the adjacent public road.

Mr Button had then telephoned me to say that I was to remove the vehicle from the public highway but was to keep it for a minimum of fourteen days.

If by then it had not been recovered by the rightful owner then I was allowed to dispose of it as I pleased.

Signed:

7th June 13 Royal Courts of Justice Hearing Right to Tape Record and Call Defendant as Witness

Maurice Kirk — Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:26:00 GMT

AN E-MAIL WITH NO RESPONSE

FAO Mr Justice Morgan

6^th June 2013 12.02pm

FAO Hearings Cardiff County Court                       BS614159

22nd & 23rd May2013 Claimant Position Statements Ruling

Further to my visit to the court to collect the 'by Tuesday' ruling, promised at the last day of the hearing, l have telephoned today about the Claimant being able to refer to it in RCJ on 7th June 13 as the alternative, possibly, to Barbara Wilding being the subject of the proceedings as past Chief Constable.

Her 'oh so dodgy' 25th Feb 2009 sworn affidavit was written with malice aforethought and proved in court following 99 witnesses's evidence.

There is no need for the Defendant's legal team
to attend as the tape recording issue is not for them.

If the outstanding ruling is substituted for Mr Justice Morgan to consider then compromise as to which witnesses should still be allowed to give evidence could be settled between parties NOW

Without that ruling causes me to remain in some difficulties for tomorrow's RCJ application

Please forward to RCJ as I still cannot find the RCJ ref number or e-mail.

Thankyou

28 May 2013   Further ruling on second list of witnesses whom Mr Kirk wishes to call.

On 29 April 2013, at a time when the Defendant were shortly to call their last witness, Mr Kirk delivered a written list of 44 witnesses whom he wished to call. On 1^st May 2013 I delivered a written ruling identifying which witnesses he was to be permitted to call. I did so pursuant to the responsibility upon the court to control the evidence by giving directions, and actively to case manage the case, under CPR 32.1 and CPR 1.4. In that written ruling it I set out the nature of the present proceedings; the Orders which have been made previously, setting out in particular the dates by which witness statements, or witness summaries, had been required to be served; the background from 2008 to date in respect of preparation of the present trial insofar as it permitted or impeded Mr Kirk’s ability to prepare evidence and secure witness statements or summaries; and the principles by which the court is governed in respect of the calling of witnesses. I adopt that in full for the purpose of the present ruling and I do not repeat it here.

Since then, Mr Kirk has given evidence over several days and has called 13 witnesses. By a Position Statement dated 22^nd May 2013 Mr Kirk served a further written list of some 19 named witnesses he would wish to call. I stated on 24 May that I would again give ruling in writing. This is (i) for clarity as to my reasons and (ii) for ease of access to a record of the ruling. I understand that a hearing is listed for Friday 7 June 2013 to consider permission to appeal (and/or appeal itself) against my ruling of 1 May 2013. I will in this ruling list the witnesses individually in this ruling, as I did in the last, by number and name in Mr Kirk’s list but preceded by a letter “B”, to avoid confusion, assuming that the present ruling may also be the subject of application for permission to appeal.

B1.       Ex-Inspector Coliandris. This is a former police officer. In these proceedings the Defendant gave an undertaking to call or tender any witness in respect of whom a witness statement had been lodged, so long as that was a presently serving officer and thus within the control of the Defendant; but expressly did not give that undertaking in respect of any witness who was no longer a serving police officer. I was told that Mr Coliandris was reluctant to attend court because of his state of health. I am aware that he wrote to the court himself seeking to inform the court confidentially of his state of health and his reservations, but stating that he did not want these details to be made known to Mr Kirk. I declined to read his representations so long as he wished the content of his communications to be kept from one of the parties and I so informed them. In the event Mr Coliandris was not called and the Defendant did not seek to tender his evidence, whether live or under the Civil Evidence Act.

Mr Kirk does not articulate the nature of the evidence which he believes Mr Coliandris could give. On the face of his witness statement Mr Coliandris is not a direct witness to any fact or incident in issue. He appears to have looked into complaint by Mr Kirk, without identifying relevant material evidence. If so, then this appears to be a witness whom Mr Kirk wishes to call blind, in the hope of either fishing for evidence in support of his case or simply cross-examining the witness in support of the same exercise. I have also sought to be alert to the possibility that a witness might be able to assist, as to the matters in issue, if he is referred to in documents before the court; but I have identified no such reference.

Accordingly I rule against permission to call this witness.

B2.       Ex Chief Inspector Trigg. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 15 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. No new material is advanced. The same considerations apply. Accordingly I still rule against permission to call Mr Trigg.

B3.      Mr Brian Genner. This is a witness who has given evidence in relation to the events of 6 June 1995. Mr Anthony Gafael and his girlfriend Alison Genner the daughter of this witness were excluded that day from their flat, an incident which led to prosecution of Mr Kirk, and in respect of which Mr Kirk complains that police officers forced entry through a roller shutter door to Mr Kirk’s premises. There are discrepancies between the account in the witness statement for these proceedings of Sergeant Roe (as he was in 1995) and others, including Mr Genner, as to when Roe was present or what he did. In the case of Mr Roe, Mr Kirk produced after Mr Roe’s evidence a statement of the time from Sergeant Roe which appeared clearly inconsistent with what Mr Roe had told me. I therefore permitted Mr Roe, exceptionally, to be recalled for further cross-examination. The inconsistencies have been explored in cross-examination by Mr Kirk and in questions from myself.

Mr Kirk seeks that Mr Genner be recalled also. However the evidence of Mr Genner has been given. The evidence of Anthony Gafael has now been given. If there is material in the evidence of Mr Genner (or Mr Gafael) on which Mr Kirk seeks to rely, or inconsistencies in the evidence between witnesses on which he seeks to rely, that is available in closing submissions and will be for me to consider as in any other case. Unlike Mr Roe, there is no earlier inconsistent written statement of Mr Genner relied upon (which in any event, if it had been available, ought to have been put to him), nor other proper reason for him to be recalled.

B4.       Mr Roe. He has been recalled once (see above). It would be wholly exceptional for a witness to be recalled for a second time. I have now heard evidence from Mr Gafael. However Mr Kirk identifies nothing new which would justify, and I have failed to identify anything in the evidence of Mr Gafael which would justify, recalling Mr Roe.

B5.       Ex Chief Inspector Colin Jones. Mr Kirk states that he is a “key player”. A chief reason for Mr Kirk’s interest is that at one of Mr Kirk’s appeals in the Crown Court a police officer attended as an observer, when he was seen to be nodding towards a police officer PC Rewbridge during the giving of her evidence. According to Mr Kirk, when asked to explain himself, the police officer said he was attending on instruction from Chief Inspector Colin Jones. Inferentially, Mr Kirk believes that Mr Colin Jones is, or may be, one of the senior police officers whom he passionately believes to have conspired to hound him.

As with a number of police officers whom Mr Kirk wished to call in his list of 29 April 2013, (i) there is no statement from the proposed witness (ii) it is wholly unlikely that the witness will give a statement, and (iii) there is no direct evidence of connection of the witness with the specific matters in issue in these proceedings. I consider that the real wish of Mr Kirk is to cross-examine the witness in the hope that something might turn up; but that there is no discernible prospect that such an exercise would assist the court.

B6.       Inspector Andrew Rice. Mr Kirk has submitted on a great number of occasions that Mr Rice should be recalled. Evidence has been given by a Mr Alexander-Ebbs that he attended Aust Service Station to give a witness statement, in respect of an assault he alleged against Mr Kirk, at a meeting attended by a number of persons including Mr Rice, where he was encouraged to “sex up” his account. However Mr Alexander-Ebbs was present in person at this court on 21^st February 2013 during the continued evidence of Mr Rice; gave a witness statement on that day making the allegations against Mr Rice; and these allegations were put to Mr Rice. Otherwise, Mr Kirk assets that Mr Rice must have been aware fo covert surveillance of Mr Kirk; and/or he now wonders whether it was Mr Rice whom he sought to “arrest” outside the magistrates’ court (rather than a Sergeant Hill) when handing over a file which Mr Kirk thought might contain important real evidence. In my respectful judgment there is, (and there continues to be), no justification for the recall of Mr Rice.

B7.       Inspector Steve Parry. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 43 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. No new material is advanced. The same considerations apply. Accordingly I still rule against permission to call Mr Parry.

B8.       Jonathan Clayton.   I made ruling in respect of Mr Clayton on 1 May 2013. No witness statement or witness summary has been served in respect of him. He is said to be relevant to the incident of 4 July 1999, but it is not said that he was a direct witness to any of the events of that day. If anything, there is less reason now for him to be called, in that Mr Kirk’s witness Susan Jenkins has given evidence of what is required of those flying from one airport and air traffic control zone to another; and Mr Aishe has given evidence of the closeness of the police helicopter to Mr Kirk’s aircraft I discern no sufficient or good reason for him to be called.

B9.      Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding. This is another renewed application – in respect of witness 2 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. Mr Kirk identifies nothing new. The same considerations apply now as did then. Accordingly I still rule against permission to call this witness.

B10.     Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brien. The position statement itself articulates no cause for him to be called. Orally, Mr Kirk said he was an important witness because he gave evidence which “caused the case [against Mr Kirk] to collapse”. I did not find it easy to follow what this evidence was supposed to be. It seemed to be that an HORT1 form was said by the police officers to have been served upon Mr Kirk, yet no document was ever traced, nor an audit trial provided for such a document, hence the case against Mr Kirk failed. However, to the extent that this is right, Mr Kirk may in any event rely upon it.

This is an incident of May 1995. in which Mr Kirk shows particular interest, in that Special Constable Deren Martin says that she served him with an HORT1 form; and has given evidence that she made enquiries with the police in Guernsey (in pursuit of whether Mr Kirk’s vehicle was or was not exempt from vehicle excise licence), being told that there was warrant for his arrest outstanding. This fuels Mr Kirk’s suspicion and belief that he was the subject of harassment by police in Wales because of his past travails with Guernsey police.

Nonetheless, it seems to me that Mr O’Brian is a paradigm case of a proposed witness from whom there is no witness statement or summary, no reason to suppose that the witness (if he can be found) will give a statement, no indication whether he would remember whether another officer served an HORT1 firm on Mr Kirk on a day 18 years ago, SC Deren Martin being the officer in the case, and one whom Mr Kirk hopes to cross-examine despite him being called as his own witness, in the hope that something might turn up. Accordingly I decline to give permission for this witness to be called.

B11.     Ex SC Ridley. Mr Kirk tells me, (if I have succeeded in following him correctly), that Mr Ridley was the investigating officer for the same incident as resulted in police photographs being taken of his vehicle (as was done for SC Deren Martin for the May 1995 incident). Similar considerations apply as with SC O’Brien. So far as I can see, this is fishing in the dark. In default of witness statement, or the beginnings of a witness summary, I cannot justify permission to call the witness.

B12.    Mrs Diana Graham. Mr Kirk asks for a “foreign witness summons”. This witness lives in France. The Claimant’s Witness Bundle includes at page 91-123 a statement, not in proper form, by this witness with associated documents. The bulk of the statement relates to the proceedings which followed the Vale of Glamorgan Show incident of August 1998, (Action 3, “2”). This is one of the claims struck out by my rulings of November 2010. Accordingly that which relates to it is not now material.

Much of the rest relates to how Mr Kirk was dealt with on occasions in court, by magistrates (and occasionally by judges, including judges in the Divisional Court), some of it clearly recording what Mr Kirk said to her and some although much less clearly being personal observation on the part of Mrs Graham. I informed the parties that I would read this statement and discard all that related to the Vale of Glamorgan Show. I do not envisage that Mrs Graham could assist me significantly further by giving evidence orally and, as I have made clear on a number of occasions, it is not permissible to call a witness in the hope that she might add something further which is not contained either in a witness statement or witness summary. Not least, if there were anything material for Mrs Graham to add, the time has long passed when such material was required to be lodged with the court. I will treat the statement as admitted in evidence, but I will make no further order.

B13.     Mr Gafael. He has now been called, since I directed steps for bailiff service of Notice to show Cause which secured his attendance on 24 May 2013.

B14.     G. Thomas. Without agreeing the content of the statement, the Defendant is content that the statement be read.   The same applies to a Mr Kirke (as to maintenance of tyres on vehicles of Mr Kirk), whom Mr Kirk raised orally on 23 May 2103 as a potential witness.

B15.    Nigel Thomas. This is in fact a renewed application – in respect of witness 30 in the ruling of 1 May 2013. No statement has been produced. No new material is advanced and the same considerations apply as before. I rule against deferment of conclusion of the evidence in order for him to be searched for and thus against permission to call Mr Thomas.

B17.     Mrs Kirstie Kirk. In the event she has been called.

B18.     Mrs G Jones. This appears not to be pursued by Mr Kirk.

B19.     Mrs J Hanson. Mr Kirk told me that he had ‘lost her statement’. In fact there is a letter from her at page 168 (Claimant’s Witness Bundle) which raises complaint about disturbance from his wayward tenants. Mr Kirk and Barry police officer witnesses whom I have heard agree the problems with alcoholism, and bad behaviour on the part of his tenants, in particular a Mr Paul Stringer and a Mr Burns. Oral evidence from Mrs Hanson, not found or available to date, is not reasonably necessary for me to deal justly with the matters in issue.

With the exception of one witness, there is no other witness whom Mr Kirk wishes to call. That exception is B16, a Michael Murphy. The Defendant made clear a considerable time ago that that it objected to reception of the evidence without the opportunity to cross-examine the witness. No witness summons was served in respect of this witness. Mr Kirk told me on Friday 24 May that he had expected the witness to be present voluntarily that day. However there was, and has been since, no communication to the court from the witness.

It is understandable that the Defendant should object to his short statement being admitted without the opportunity to cross-examine him. The statement is one compiled by Mr Kirk in September 2010, with an added signature of the witness, and in manuscript the words “content below relating to me is true to the best of belife(sic)”. It describes him as a scrap dealer previously reported for stealing a veterinary practice car back in 1996 (presumably Mr Kirk’s veterinary practice); and the police are said to have told the witness on the one hand “I want you to take it back immediately to Penarth police station, where I will later inform Kirk it has been traced” and on the other hand one of the police is said to have jumped into the scrap dealer’s cab and himself to have driven it to Penarth: the two clearly conflict. On the other hand the statement reads that the police told him “We hate Kirk’s guts” and that the policeman said he would “have the greatest of pleasure in booking Kirk when he comes to collect it and drives it away without tax, MOT or insurance”.

The failure to appear without explanation, to support the statement such as I have described it, is not a prepossessing basis to ask for the court to appoint another day of hearing. If all, or even some, of Mr Kirk’s complaints of police harassment and bad faith are upheld, on the other evidence I have heard over some 49 days, the evidence of the scrap dealer suspected of stealing the practice car in 1996 will be peripheral; if few, or none are upheld it will be improbable that the evidence of Mr Murphy would tilt the balance on any of them. The court has gone to what I consider to be extreme lengths, in order to accommodate genuine difficulties to Mr Kirk in preparing his case, and those which are of his own making; and has granted great latitude to him in calling witnesses despite failure to serve statements in the form and by the dates stipulated. Applying the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly and proportionately, I do not consider it reasonably necessary that the court should appoint another day for hearing of evidence in the case of this witness.

28 May 2013.                                      His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn, QC

Appellants’ Skeleton Argument for Mr Justice Morgan              BS416159

(Late due to the Appellant waiting for the written rulings of his last applications before Cardiff County Court in time to appeal at Royal Courts of Justice and without it am unable to adequately comment on the Respondent’s skeleton argument with errors and huge assumptions)

There are but three issues for His Lordship to consider,

1)    the right for the Claimant to have the Defendant(s) give evidence in the light of the apparent criminal intent born out both in evidence and contained within the paragraphs of the Chief Constable’s 25^th February 2009 sworn affidavit in another attempt to avoid disclosure of relevant evidence under his/her control since 1992 to date

2)    the right for the Claimant to have senior police officers, identified both before and during the trial, to give evidence or to be recalled, with or without witness statements, concerning their apparent course of conduct to both prejudice the Claimant’s health and his basic right to bring a claim for civil damages in the first place

3)    for the Claimant or his legal representatives to only tape record evidence given on oath, under the strict supervision of the court and/or to be supplied with an audible copy of court proceedings as is allowed all over the world nowadays, including in England.

Witnesses

The Claimant’s right to call both a competent and compellable witness when, by law, a witness is ‘anybody’s property’ and especially, as in this case of these first three of nine Actions for damages against the South Wales Police, one Defendant, as the example, has been identified as signing her own 2009 affidavit (attached) knowing or ought to have known it to be riddled with lies and supports the Appellant’s argument that the Defendant has carried out a course of conduct tantamount to both unusual and extreme bullying with criminal intent.

Analysis of 25^th February 2009 Barbara Wilding Affidavit:

18.   para 8.23

Another traffic incident and a Barry court case was born out in evidence making her denial there ever was one another of her lies to bury the truth of a clear conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The lengths to which key players, mostly senior police officers, have been protected in these civil proceedings, is scandalous.

19.   para 8.26 as per paragraph 13

20.   para 8.13

The incident when my Guernsey registered BMW motorcycle was stolen while her covert surveillance police were at the scene, my Barry veterinary Hospital, when the theft took place, makes her denial the police removed the number plate, on recovery, just one more of her lies.

2^nd Action

23.   para 5.1

The incident of her officers falsifying Barry magistrates evidence by trying to ‘frame me’ for someone else’s speeding offence was proved in court with the subsequent arrest of the lawyer and seizure of the Crown Prosecution Service’s file makes her denial there ever was an incident or a court case one more of her lies.

The fact that Dolmans, solicitors, admit CPS prosecutor, Stan Soffa, did not wish to be called as her defence witness beggars belief and anyway, who’s counting the incidents committed by the police?

27. to 29   para 10.1

First arrested for the theft of a car I had already reported as stolen, they having confiscated it and deliberately not told me where it was, just like with my Guernsey registered BMW motorcycle and Honda van, secondly, stopped for speeding and faulty exhaust and then, ten or so minutes later, stopped on some fabrication, to breathalyse, embarrassingly overlooked by the previous officers.

3^rd Action

32.

Her throw away comment of ‘antiquity’ being her excuse of failed disclosure is both insulting and typically arrogant. From 1993 onwards my English solicitors, me or my secretaries would follow up each incident with requests for either disclosure or to preserve their records.

Adrian Oliver drafted her document being a party to the fanciful plan to prejudice these civil proceedings by arresting me for trading in machine guns, carrying a mandatory ten year prison term. Caswell Clinic convened my MAPPA level 3 hearings to have me further incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison but only using their rogue NHS (Wales) psychiatrist promised GMC protection for whatever he said in a Welsh court room.

These following 22^nd and 23^rd May13 Position Statements were subject to appeal to the High Court but have not been adjudicated upon in time, at the Cardiff County Court, for this 7^th June 2013 Royal Courts of Justice Hearing

That coupled with his Lordship’s Order suggesting that this Claimant ‘may or may not be appealing earlier rulings’ over witnesses causes the court to be reminded that this hearing ought to be adjourned for all the reasons set out in the Appellant’s 28^th May Application (attached at the bottom)

22^nd May 13 Claimant Position Statement

1.      The Claimant asks His Honour to consider whether it is fitting that the Defendant be asked to more formally clarify their position on some points that at first may seem unrelated but have a common theme of legal argument around :-

a.       Whether the Claimant should be allowed to amend any of his Claims ‘out of time’.

b.      Be allowed the issue of exemplary and/or aggravated damages to be considered.

c.       Will the Defendants ever stop ‘actually harassing’ the Claimant as for example of in recent times by police using and sending to other police forces information to lead other police forces and other public sector departments to view the Claimant prejudicially by leading them to believe that the Claimant is delusional.

d.      By the Defendant disseminating information to say the Claimant is delusional either that means what they say is untrue and the Defendant refuse to stop harassing the Claimant and may affect the level of damages

e.       Or if what the Defendant disseminates is true then being delusional is a condition which allows the Claimant to be eligible to amend the Claims before the court that are ‘out of time’ by the time limitation period.

2.      The Claimant raises the issues from reading page 198 point 13.40 and related sections of A Practical Approach to Civil Procedure by Stuart Sime, twelfth edition (2009) that says that Judicial reasoning can be that Claims can usually be amended but that an amendment is treated as a new claim and cannot be brought out of time. However page 101 gives explanation on point 7.40 that a Claim (and therefore an amendment to a Claim) can be brought ‘out of time’ if the Claimant had a mental disability at the time the new Claim accrued.

3.      As the Defendant, in recent years, persistently disseminates information about the Claimant, as being delusional, then that means the Claimant may apply to the Court to amend the Claims that accrued when he was delusional.

4.      If the information, disseminated by the Defendant, is not true then that may be relevant exemplary and aggravated damages and even amount to defamation.

5.      If the information that the Defendant disseminates about the Claimant, being delusional, is untrue then the Claimant asks that a statement is made as to when the Defendant will stop disseminating this untrue defamatory information and how it will go about achieving that as well as the Defendants withdrawing what they have sent to many other public bodies, including the Metropolitan Police, the Guernsey police, the French police and even government departments in the royal courts of Justice and Whitehall from around 2002 and onwards when applications were made that the Claimant be registered a Vexatious Litigant and as a MAPPA level 3 victim.

6.      If, on the other hand, the information they disseminate about the Claimant is true then that requires the Defendant to say as from what date he is delusional or with a mental disability as the Claimant can be allowed by the Court to amend any claim that accrued from that date when he first had a mental disability.

7.      As we are aware much by the Claimant is in writing and so if the Defendant gives detail as to the Claimant being delusional, for just one moment, then an independent expert can be used to trace back the detail from that moment identified by the Defendant to where the indication of delusional in writings first emerged.

8.      A critical detail is that the Defendant actually disseminates information to say that the Claimant is delusional for ‘thinking he is harassed by police’.

9.      The Claimant complains to police, at least, as from 20^th June 1993, when the Claimant was in unlawful custody, up an including to today’s Position Statement

10. Given the Defendant disseminates information that the Claimant is delusional, for thinking he is harassed by police, please would the Defendant clarify at what point the Claimant was first displaying being delusional, by complaining he was harassed by police, so that the Claimant can apply to amend his Claims that accrued on or after that date.

11. If the Claimant was not delusional about being harassed by police, yet wrote and complained that he was harassed by police from say, 20^th June 1993, following information given to the Defendant by the Guernsey Police, at what point will the Defendant ensure the Claimant is no longer harassed by police, such as the Defendant stopping disseminating false and malicious information about the Claimant and will the Defendant comment on the obvious reluctance of the Defendant to stop harassing the Claimant in the context of exemplary and/or aggravated damages

A)      Witnesses outstanding in 1-3 Actions

1.       Ex Inspector Colliandris (medical argument irrelevant)

2.       Ex Chief Inspector Sean (Shawn) Trigg (key player)

3.       Ex Brian Jenner (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

4.        Ex Chief Inspector Insp Robert Nelson Roe (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

5.        Ex Chief Inspector Collin Jones (key player)

6.        Inspector Andrew Rice (Recall re 1^st Action 8.23 & CP Ebbs/Alexander)

7.        Inspector Steve Parry (Penal order on Defendant)

8.        Jonathan Clayton Air Traffic Controller (Dangerous flying/Penal Order)

9.        Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding (Defendant)

10.      Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian (Penal Order on Defendant)

11.      Ex Special Constable Ridley (Penal Order on Defendant)

12.       Mrs Diana Graham (Foreign Witness Summons)

13.       A Gafael (re break-in Cardiff Vet surgery/Penal Order)

14.       G Thomas (stolen BMW m/c/ Penal order)

15.       ‘Yosser’ Nigel Thomas (stolen BMW m/c)

16.       Michael Murphy (Defendant’s destruction of Claimant’s vehicles)

17.      Mrs K Kirk

18.      Mrs G Jones

19.      Mrs J Hanson

B)       Application for Jury Trials for:

a)     4^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

b)    5^th Action Machine gun Case/malicious pros, false imprisonments

c)     6^th Action Forensic Psychiatrist/NHS (Wales) False Medical Records

           d)     7^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

     e)     8^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

C)    Claimant’s Fitness to Continue?

D)   Previous ‘struck out’ incidents in 1-3 Actions to be re instated

E)     Current Civil Proceedings (post Woolf/ Human Rights Act)

F) HM Crown Prosecution Service continues to ignore disclosure applications from Claimant, his solicitor or from his barrister re:

              i) Refusal to disclose evidence to clarify NHS psychiatric records at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend

             ii)  Refusal to disclose July 2012 evidence re doctor's statement that caused Claimant imprisoned

            iii) Refusal to disclose depositions re above withdrawn indictment of 'harassment'

          iv) Refusal to disclose depositions re one Lewis machine gun indictment and subsequent acquittal

           v) Refusal to supply Claimant with copy of his own MG11 victim statement re above outstanding issues

            vi) Refusal to supply Claimant with date he was first deemed to have a mental disability

G)     Interim payment for costs and damage

Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                                                  22^nd May 2013

(23^rd May 13 Position Statement mislaid and to follow)

Private Tape Recording, ‘Litigants in Person’ to be awarded legal costs and the Crushing of Family Court Cartels

The future of our UK court administration, if not already a night mare, is a pretty grim one right now with the lack of funding for expertise and the extra work caused by the withdrawal of legal aid.

One’s inability to find a truly independent lawyer these days with ever mounting unexplained costs incurred, should you be so lucky, is why this Claimant is adding to the problem by having to act alone.

Also, if this Claimant’s current Cardiff court action is typical of a ‘litigant in person’ floundering around in a quagmire of both regulation and custom with fast aging faculties barely keeping his head above water, then what is the future of our law courts when many more are forced to do the same?

In order for ‘litigants in person’ to achieve anything from the clear futility of it all then to further break down lucrative and unfair cartels, as currently practiced in the UK courts, is what each must strive to do and share any information from one’s mistakes.

This Claimant suggests we remain vigilant in what is to be ultimately achieved, the significant reform of a grossly outdated money driven judiciary and not to allow our own court cases to over shadow this primary objective, the clinching of that man made concept, some call ‘justice’ for all parties.

In The High Court Royal Courts of Justice                                                     BS614159

Before Mr Justice Morgan

Maurice Kirk v Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

Appellant’s Application to Adjourn of 7^th June 13 High Court Hearing

Further to the 14^th May 2013 High Court Order of the Honourable Mr Justice Morgan the Appellant applies for an appropriate adjournment in order to:

12. Obtain the official transcript as he was unable to tape record for his own use within the case in preparation for subsequent appeal(s)

13. obtain clarification as to which of the outstanding witnesses, identified in his 22^nd and 23^rd May 13 Position Statements to the Crown Court judge and

14. in the light of the enclosed further statement of A G Gafael and The Defendant’s February 2009 sworn Affidavit and

15. concerning the proposed 28^th May 13 ruling , by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, due to be handed down today and

16. For appellant to obtain fee exemption in order to complete his prosecution and subsequent appeal(s)

AND

17. The Appellant asks the court to consider whether it is fitting that the Defendant be asked to more formally clarify their position on some points that at first may seem unrelated but have a common theme of legal argument around :-

f.        Whether the Appellant should be allowed to amend any of his Claims ‘out of time’.

g.       Be allowed the issue of exemplary and/or aggravated damages to be considered.

h.       Will the Defendants ever stop ‘actually harassing’ the Appellant as for example of in recent times by police using and sending to other police forces information to lead other police forces and other public sector departments to view the Appellant prejudicially by leading them to believe that the Appellant is delusional.

i.         By the Defendant disseminating information to say the Appellant is delusional either that means what they say is untrue and the Defendant refuse to stop harassing the Appellant and may affect the level of damages

j.        Or if what the Defendant disseminates is true then being delusional is a condition which allows the Appellant to be eligible to amend the Claims before the court that are ‘out of time’ by the time limitation period.

18. The Appellant raises the issues from reading page 198 point 13.40 and related sections of A Practical Approach to Civil Procedure by Stuart Sime, twelfth edition (2009) that says that Judicial reasoning can be that Claims can usually be amended but that an amendment is treated as a new claim and cannot be brought out of time. However page 101 gives explanation on point 7.40 that a Claim (and therefore an amendment to a Claim) can be brought ‘out of time’ if The Appellant had a mental disability at the time the new Claim accrued.

19. As the Defendant, in recent years, persistently disseminates information about the Appellant, as being delusional, then that means the Appellant may apply to the Court to amend the Claims that accrued when he was delusional.

20. If the information, disseminated by the Defendant, is not true then that may be relevant exemplary and aggravated damages and even amount to defamation.

21. If the information that the Defendant disseminates about the Appellant, being delusional, is untrue then the Appellant asks that a statement is made as to when the Defendant will stop disseminating this untrue defamatory information and how it will go about achieving that as well as the Defendants withdrawing what they have sent to many other public bodies, including the Metropolitan Police, the Guernsey police, the French police and even government departments in the royal courts of Justice and Whitehall from around 2002 and onwards when applications were made that the Appellant be registered a Vexatious Litigant and as a MAPPA level 3 victim.

22. If, on the other hand, the information they disseminate about the Appellant is true then that requires the Defendant to say as from what date he is delusional or with a mental disability as the Appellant can be allowed by the Court to amend any claim that accrued from that date when he first had a mental disability.

23. As we are aware much by the Claimant is in writing and so if the Defendant gives detail as to the Appellant being delusional, for just one moment, then an independent expert can be used to trace back the detail from that moment identified by the Defendant to where the indication of delusional in writings first emerged.

24. A critical detail is that the Defendant actually disseminates information to say that the appellant is delusional for ‘thinking he is harassed by police’.

25. The Appellant complains to police, at least, as from 20^th June 1993, when the appellant was in unlawful custody, up an including to today’s Position Statement.

26. Given the Defendant disseminates information that the Appellant is delusional, for thinking he is harassed by police, please would the Defendant clarify at what point the Appellant was first displaying being delusional, by complaining he was harassed by police, so that the Appellant can apply to amend his Claims that accrued on or after that date.

27. If the Appellant was not delusional about being harassed by police, yet wrote and complained that he was harassed by police from say, 20^th June 1993, following information given to the Defendant by the Guernsey Police, at what point will the Defendant ensure the appellant is no longer harassed by police, such as the Defendant stopping disseminating false and malicious information about the Appellant and will the Defendant comment on the obvious reluctance of the Defendant to stop harassing the Appellant in the context of exemplary and/or aggravated damages

A)      Witnesses outstanding in 1-3 Action

1.       Ex Inspector Colliandris (medical argument irrelevant)

2.       Ex Chief Inspector Sean (Shawn) Trigg (key player)

3.       Ex Brian Jenner (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

4.        Ex Chief Inspector Insp Robert Nelson Roe (Recall re Break in Cardiff Vet Surgery)

5.        Ex Chief Inspector Collin Jones (key player)

6.        Inspector Andrew Rice (Recall re 1^st Action 8.23 & CP Ebbs/Alexander)

7.        Inspector Steve Parry (Penal order on Defendant)

8.        Jonathan Clayton Air Traffic Controller (Dangerous flying/Penal Order)

9.        Ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding (Defendant)

10.      Ex Special Constable Frank O’Brian (Penal Order on Defendant)

11.      Ex Special Constable Ridley (Penal Order on Defendant)

12.       Mrs Diana Graham (Foreign Witness Summons)

13.       A Gafael (re break-in Cardiff Vet surgery/Penal Order)

14.       G Thomas (stolen BMW m/c/ Penal order)

15.       ‘Yosser’ Nigel Thomas (stolen BMW m/c)

16.       Michael Murphy (Defendant’s destruction of Claimant’s vehicles)

19.      Mrs J Hanson

B)    Application for Jury Trials for:

a)     4^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

b)    5^th Action Machine gun Case/malicious pros, false imprisonments

c)     6^th Action Forensic Psychiatrist/NHS (Wales) incorrect Medical Records

     d)     7^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

     e)     8^th Action police bullying/ malicious pros, false imprisonments

C)    Claimant’s Fitness to Continue?

D)   Previous ‘struck out’ incidents in 1-3 Actions to be re instated

E)     Current Civil Proceedings (post Woolf/ Human Rights Act)

F) HM Crown Prosecution Service continues to ignore disclosure applications from Claimant, his solicitor or from his barrister re:

              i) Refusal to disclose evidence to clarify NHS psychiatric records at Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend

             ii)  Refusal to disclose July 2012 evidence re doctor's statement that caused Claimant imprisoned

            iii) Refusal to disclose depositions re above withdrawn indictment of 'harassment'

          iv) Refusal to disclose depositions re one Lewis machine gun indictment and subsequent acquittal

           v) Refusal to supply Claimant with copy of his own MG11 victim statement re above outstanding issues

            vi) Refusal to supply Claimant with date he was first deemed to have a mental disability

G)     Interim payment for costs and damage

Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                                                28^th May 2013

PILOT MAGAZINE....previous pages at bottom of previous blogs

Pilot Mag April 2002 MJK Profile_0001 (4).pdf

POLICE APPLICATION for POLICE CUSTODY VIDEOS TO BE BLOCKED from His Honour Judge Seys Lewellin QC on 3rd April

Maurice Kirk — Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:29:00 GMT

Witnesses for Week 4 Cardiff Civil Justice Centre 3rd April 13 10.30

STOP PRESS

Queens Council for the Chief Constable of the South Wales Police will apply on Wednesday, 3rd April, to block this video from being shown to the trial judge, His Honour Judge Seys Lewellin QC, EXACTLY as they succeeded in doing at my original 2000 magistrates, 2001 appeal and three JR applications after these same police, an Inspector Collins reported the driving conviction that the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons relied upon to have my name removed from the veterinary register , effectively , for life!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=4

Adrian Oliver.

15:11 (1 hour ago)

Dear Mr Kirk,

I refer to your further attendance at our offices on Thursday 28 March 2013, when you again sought to ignore the fact that we have withdrawn your licence to attend at our offices. I am given to understand that you caused disruption and inconvenience to other users of the building which we occupy and that the security staff at the building considered it necessary to communicate with the police in this regard. I would again urge you to deal with any necessary matters in compliance with the court orders which have been made in this matter.

I would also wish to record that you were not prepared to identify the basis of your attendance with the staff who sought to speak with you.

I refer to your telephone contact with Dolmans at 1.30 pm on 2 April 2013. I would again remind you of my prior request that you deal with matters by email due to your propensity to distort comments made in telephone discussion. You have been able to communicate by email and indeed, have sought to encourage the same. I record that it is only during the course of the adjournment of your civil trial that you have sought again to attend our premises and to communicate by telephone, even though you have been prepared to communicate previously by email. I would again ask you to revert to dealing with matters through this medium as it enables both parties to prepare for matters arising in the trial.

You have left a message at 1.30 pm asking for details of the witnesses who are to be called tomorrow (3 April 2013) for trial. You can be advised that it is the intention of Leading Counsel to invite former police officer Robert Osbourne to provide evidence at court on 3 April 2013.

I can also advise you however that Mr Lloyd Williams QC intends to address the court before any further evidence has been provided as to your failure to deal with the disclosure of any videos / digital footage which you might have in your possession.

I trust this email will provide you with sufficient notice to prepare for these matters.

Yours sincerely,

Adrian P. Oliver

Senior Partner

Dolmans Solicitors

SWP Schedule Defendant witnesses 4th week.pdf

SWP Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirk final.pdf

Dear Poorly Informed Tax Payer,

GUERNSEY, Channel Islands, is where I set up a ‘legal aid’ charity and first learnt to 'cut my teeth' on the current subject now unfolding at last, after twenty years, in Cardiff's Civil Justice Centre. It is HM Partnership's 'cosy relationship' as Lord George Foulkes once put it, the ‘incestuous relationship’ between both executive and judiciary, all protected within it by 'Royal Charters'.

.The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon's immunity to prosecution is the classic example when still refusing to ‘convene a court’, contrary to statute, simply to consider my numerous applications, over the last nine years, for my name to be returned to the veterinary register. [See the past twelve years of ‘Down Loads’ and other ‘Blogs’ on this website].

Here, in 'Old South Wales', as dentist John Wilson in 'New South Wales' will quickly concur, 'Her Majesty's Prerogative' continues to allow rampant nefarious conduct in our UK law courts to flourish, compounded by outdated 'adversarial systems' once based on trust.

Take the ‘Musa Family Case’, as another typical example, currently on appeal, ‘we think’, where Haringey Council lawyers ‘cashed in’ on the act, again all immune to any HM regulatory retribution or HM prosecution in either our civil or criminal courts.

[The Nigerian couple are currently serving seven years imprisonment with all seven of their children now snatched and outrageously ‘re homed’ instead of just being put on the next flight to Nigeria].

The paranoia surrounding this tragic case was further revealed in the way I was jailed for ‘attempting’ to fly the kids home in my two seat WW2 Piper Cub and then being prosecuted, in my absence, as Cardiff’s judiciary would not even ‘produce’ me from similarly outdated prison system! .This old ‘Out of Court’ video, below, has been held back until now to be a stark warning of things yet to come both in England and Wales, if not already here.

Does it stink or does it stink?

EXPOSURE VIDEO of GUERNSEY, as an IRA safe house, drug dealer's dream, insider dealer's paradise and where the incestuous island's De Vic Cary's grand father collaborated, as Bailiff, with the Germans, enough for Churchill intending to have him hanged, was the same little b+stard who jailed me 21 times, anything to prevent education on 'basic human rights' to be intoduced to a two teir structure his masonic mates and the serfs.

http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM

http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx

While in Wales,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y

We still have a Dr Tegwyn Williams 'at large', on 'long term sick with his wife,' on my account, despite falsifying yet further 'victim' statements

11 11 15 Solicitor letter to Cardiff Magistrates.pdf

12 08 20 MJK MG11 Redacted shr.pdf

Much more about NHS (Wales) multi million conspiracy, later.

In Cardiff County Court this Month

Lantwit Major's police sergeant Kilberg, one of many in the 1990s police force, who had my name removed from the veterinary register is caught out lying to the currently presiding judgere along with a few others already heard and shortly to also give evidence.

Enclosed is a 90s Barry police station custody video of Kilberg lying to the custody sergeant that I was in breach of a public order offence despite the custody sergeant specifically asking for that clarification.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellin QC or the police QC, during the three months civil action currently in session in the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, asked for clarification on exactly the same point with the South Wales Police sergeant qualifying the issue by stating the custody sergeant made the mistake when writing down the facts.

The truth of the matter was his partner, PC Gareth Holmes was right there, seen on video and refusing to support the deliberate lie either by recording it in his pocket note book or in his subsequent MG 11 witness statement.

Llantwit Major's Police Sergeant Kilberg Video to follow

http://youtu.be/eBkNCYYfJOE

Meanwhile a letter of more importance, if 'testicles on a plate without an anaesthetic' is to be avoided, to the only others in Wales, apparently, responsible for maintaining law and order throughout The Principality........

13 03 31 to CPS NHS.doc

AND this latest thoroughly insulting bit of nonsense from Cardiff's magistrates, court concerning the police refusing to return some £10,000 worth of antique guns and a walking stick confiscated in 2009/10 while desperate to get me a 10 year mandatory prison sentace for 'trading in prohibited weapons '!

Such as the WW1 Lewis machine gun, the most effective such weapon in the war and was bolted to my, now sold, replica DH2 RFC biplane fighter, an aircraft, like the September 1940 Hurricane, that turned the tables in 1916, just at such acute points in two world wars.....b*stards

13 03 28 Shot Guns and Muskets MagistratesCase Stated Response.pdf

ARE WE DEALING WITH EVIL HERE?

Masonic Devil Worship?

Dolmans, Cardiff solicitors,

You either settle or or I publish ex Chief Inspector' Jenner and ex Ely police station's Inspector Roe's recorded evidence denying , as did the b*tch of bitches, Barbara Wilding, by sworn affidavit, denying the knowledge of court cases and her ordering the use of a sledge hammer and a crow bar to break into my Cardiff veterinary surgery just to put back Jenner's daughter, Alison, effectively putting trouble and druggies back into my overhead flat .

Your client also had me put in Cardiif prison, for four days, pretending you vermin could not 'recognise' me!

Your client had the machine gun painted a different colour to try and fool a Cardiff jury

Your client had me up for speeding when in possession of the photograph of the true driver, his name adress and when I arrested CPS lawyer Stoffa the police ran a mile , in the wrong direction

Your client repeatedly had me arrested on the road side following a purported positive breath test only for there to be a zero reading within 20 minutes on the police stations' ' definitive test' machine.......any filthy trick to aggrevate and proke a victim.

Do I appear drunk in this Bridgend police custody video? This was immediately after 10pm arrest at Pencoed but almost negative reading on the station definitive machine (a lager or two at lunch time). The arrest was for for 'dangerous driving', that the south Wales Police lost, before a jury, after the judge had to stop the Cardiff trial for jury complaining the police were signalling to their mates onwhilst under my cross examination.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzSPSX-hVEE.

Your client, in 'Operation Orchid' tried to snatch our then ten year old child, using social services, bullying my then wife to signed a pre prepared witness statement that I was insane.......you evil bunch of lawyers conspired with NHS' Morgan Cole, solicitors to use Dr williams to have me arrested by armed police helicopter but failing to get a conviction or steel our daughter but instigated immediate divorce proceedings ....the thought of spineless tactics I should of expected

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JdcyhiC3e0&list=PL0A52598AD5E0C099

As lawyers you advised Barbara Wilding to have me registered MAPPA level 3

Your client, with your advise, then had Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams of Caswell clinic, to have me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act without a shred of evidence and without even examining his patient, for one purpose.....to delay this three month trial ever coming to court!

Oh, yes and what is the latest? Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams falsifies another police victim statement, in july last year, having me locked up for weeks in prison until the CPS then get involved to prepare for another rigged Cardiff judiciary jury trial.

And what did the CPS find? Dr Williams' circa 21st July 13 'victim' statement record? I had been around to his home and had harassed both he and his wife, Dr Janis Hillier causing the police to 'move me on'...utter bollocks,,,I do not even know or wish to know, other than to arrange a private prosecution 'procedure'as to where the fat over paid 'toad' lives.

Oh yes, I almost forgot....four times I have been to the police stations to complain and written long statements but your client, you advise them, ignore him , he will not live much longer.

Two sets of lawyers, one from England and one from Cardiff, have asked both the police and the CPS for a copy of that July 13 victim statement but they both reply....."it cannot be found"

Just for starters...... and we now move into two months of more fun or is it Romans chapter 12, verse19, is it?

Why is your client continuing to ignore the seriousnes of Christopher Alexander's (alias Ebbs). statement of yet anopther south wales Police conspiracy?....Worried it might be true? But you lot can continue to steal another huge chunk of tax payers' hard earned cash if you 'string it along' just like my seven or so listed Actions against your client. Remember, police officer Rice told the court he had no knowledge of Ebbs/Alexander or recognise him standing at the back of the court.

12 10 26 Ebbs Staterment.pdf

Your clients' collusion with Cardiff masonic devil worshiping judges had my web site closed down, last time, when we got a little too close to the truth about your disgusting money making regime but try it again and the articles will spring up on 10 other already primed web sites positioned abroad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0gQc1mveKg

Your client ran to the protection of Judge Nicholarse Cooke QC and got it following His Honour's receipt of the following 'jury note' of a flagrant conspiracy by the South Wales Police caught red handed' by the jury!!! That aborted 'dangerous driving' case must be heard also in the next few days, I presume?

Punitive Damages

Punitive DamagesInEnglandand Wales, exemplary damages are limited to the circumstances set out by Lord Devlin in the leading case of Rookes v Barnard:

Oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional actions by the servants of government.
Where the defendant's conduct was 'calculated' to make a profit for himself.
Where a statute expressly authorises the same.

Rookes v Barnard has been much criticised and has not been followed in Canada or Australiaor by the Privy Council.^[7]

Another case that could arguably be seen as an example of punitive damageswas that of Attorney-General v Blakein which the defendant profited from publishing a book detailing his work for MI5. The details were very old and therefore did not cause loss to the state. The publishing was, however, in breach of the contract of employment (and incidentally criminallyin breach of the Official Secrets Act 1911). The defendant was required to give an account of his profits gained from writing the book.

Thecourts have been very reluctant to follow this approach,^[9]emphasising the materiality of the criminalelement required for these damagesto be considered.

2) aggravated damages

"Aggravated damages are compensatory in nature, while punitive damages are awarded as punishment for egregious conduct....

NHS Doctor Faces Million Pound Damages re my Sectioned in France WANTED 3 Month P/A + MINDER 24/7 tel 07907937953

Maurice Kirk — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:07:00 GMT

"We Will GetThe B******d"
See overhead video

http://www.youtube.com/user/kirkflyingvet

DAMAGES THREE MONTH TRIAL STARTS 18th Feb13 @ Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/

JERSEY 26th January Video Interview re South Wales Police

and NHS (Wales) Conspiracy to have me Jailed in France

http://www.youtube.com/user/tomgruchy

‘Frustrated Maurice’

I am sending to the Crown Prosecution Service (London) samples of tape recordings, similar to those on my website blog, of Cardiff Magistrates original 1^st December 2011 conviction for ‘harassing’ the Caswell Clinic doctor. He had, without appropriate medical qualifications, recommended I be sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act and to be incarcerated, as a MAPPA Level 3 registered victim, without my knowledge, to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, most like likely for life.

The Cardiff CPS had told the 2^nd December 2009 judge, caught on transcript, that this doctor, all on his own, had further stated I that I had both irreversible and significant brain damage causing me to be categorised as being one of the UK’s 5% most dangerous individuals.

Cardiff Crown Court refuse to allow me to hear the CD record of the redacted 2^nd December 2009, 1^st and 2^nd March 12 Crown Court , the appeal from the original 1^st December 2011 District Judge John Charles , Cardiff Magistrates’ ‘harassment’ conviction hearing or that of the 2^nd May 12 Trial by Jury, the subject now before the Royal Courts of Justice, a breach of a restraining order never ‘served’ on me in the first place!

1. Did you receive Cardiff Court instructions, as I am given to believe, that on each occasion the respective Cardiff judges, His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, HHJ Hughes and HHJ Curran QC, that one or all three had your original transcribed records changed?

2. If so, which ones and what were changed?

3. Will you send me copy of the redacted portions in order to avoid a ‘class action’ in an English court against your employers?

I have spent thousands of pounds, over the years, on transcripts and ‘being corrupted’ has been the usual court clerk’s excuse for my not receiving the expensive full transcripts and significantly at variance to those of my own record of court proceedings in both Crown an Royal Courts of Justice courts.

The doctor had originally, on 7th August 2009, without even examining me, successfully applied to having me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act as having a ‘paranoid delusional disorder,’ having a fixed false belief unameanable to reason, in that I believed I was being persecuted by the South Wales Police and its Cardiff judiciary.

The omitted oral evidence, recording I was not allowed to have my legal papers, give evidence or call witnesses, some waiting in the building, is urgently needed for my appeal listed before the Criminal Court of Appeal.

Thankyou.

http://www.youtube.com/user/tomgruchy

11 11 15 CourtRoom1of3.wma

Tomorrow at 10am at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, disguised as a Kirk v Kirk divorce proceedings, a huge team of local lawyers and judges will commence the next stage in obtaining my my bankruptcy.

Why?

For the sole purpose of stopping my three month trial damages claim, due on 18th February, from even starting. The Breton affair is an indication, the machine gun and MAPPA registration in order to having me short ave all miserably failed.

The falsification of family property by chosen taffia is the least I expected in tomorrow's proceedings

I will be asking for a Mackenzie Friend and the tape recording of it under MY Control and AOLL CASES should be heard OUTSIDE WALES' den of iniquity

Cardiff Crown Court continues, of course, to refuse to let me listen to the 4th May13 jury trial conspiracy, originally hatched by a string of 9 Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, barristers, back in the 90s, in a ring with key police officers to have my name removed from the veterinary register.

The trail judge was a party to criminal proceedings culminating in police asking the RCVS to have me struck off.

Back in the 2000s 9, Park Place chambers, barristers were caught in a lucrative ring reliant on prisoners in Cardiff police cells being charged, using the same defence teams, back hander to the duty sergeant, to dictate the poor sod's fate.

Cardiff judges, often from those chambers are known to visit the juries, during their private deliberations, stating whether they should bring a 'Guilty' plea or not

It stinks, doesnt it?

Not a patch of what will leak out of their manure heap tomorrow and the following day.

13 02 03 REDACTED Criminal Court of Appeal ref.doc

13 01 29 Prosecution Witnesses PART ONE requiring witness summonses.doc

13 01 31 PART 2 MJK Prosecution Witness List.doc

Oh , I almost forgot..guess where the 4th May 13 CPS barrister came from? and the original one at 1st Dec 12 magistrates harassment conviction ,caught red handed on somebodies recording device....eg caught switching cocked up exhibits etc etc, mid trial expecting me not to notice , in custody behind bullet proof glass, refused legal papers from my cell or lawyer or my lawyer's brief, my own witnesses or right to cross examine the rogue police doctor? And in tomorrow's bit of skullduggery guess which cambers Lisa Thomas comes from??

VN850036.WMA this man talking to District Judge John Charles, wash your mouth out, Maurice

I am being pushed by all this in publishing further Cardiff tapes

https://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=you+tube+maurice+kirk&oq=you+tube+maurice+kirk&gs_l=hp.12..0i8i13i30.8355.14767.0.19394.21.21.0.0.0.0.863.5566.0j11j6j1j0j2j1.21.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.2.hp.pkPW1JFKNGA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.41934586,d.d2k&fp=32705b7f4f76e02c&biw=1093&bih=490

http://www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk/

27th Jan 13 LETTER to His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

re Wide Spread Corruption in Cardiff Courts

13 01 27 SWP Dr MJK to Morgan Cole HHJ SL.doc

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

Within 30 minutes of speaking with NHS (Wales) rogue lawers while having lunch he is surrounded in his Merdrignac Breton main street and bungled into a 'pannier a salad' and driven to Pontivy Hospital for psycho analysis.

Coincides in just days of GMC conclusion on Caswell Clinic doctor, IPCC machine gun and South Wales Police and CPS re appeals in London, all effeffectively, arriving 'all together'......to further substantiate a South Wales taffia conspiracy to pervert the course of justice

By EYE WITNESS

STATEMENT OF EVENTS ON THE 24/01/2013

IN THE VILLAGE OF MERDRIGNAC FRANCE

After having lunch at a cafe Maurice kirk and myself walked to another cafe for coffee ,where we made a video involving an old gentleman and his opinion of the UK in Europe.

Having left there at approximately 1.30pm we then walked to a butcher shop, purchased some pate and then carried on to the council office, after this we proceeded to the police station.

Whilst and the police office Maurice tried to explain that the squatters in one of his properties had destroyed some valuable antiques for fire wood to which the police started to laugh and treat Mr Kirk with from my opinion great disrespect.

The police then insisted that they could not understand or speak any English and refused to take Mr Kirk's complaint. Mr Kirk then proceeded to become agitated with his treatment and shouted at then calling them Nazi bastards to which I heard laughter, at this point I suggest to morris it would be wise to leave which we did.

We had walked out of the police station past the butchers when I notice the two young officers who laughed at Mr Kirk in the first instance running down the road past us and pointed this to Maurice, Maurice was involved in a conversation with a local at this time.

I started to walk towards the car and spoke to the ethnic police officer as he ask where we were parked, at this point Maurice came around the corner and told me not to speak with them which I did. The police attention then focused on Maurice and several officers were present, two young ones and two older ones.

Maurice was then marched back to the station with an officer on each arm.

Whilst Maurice was being processed an officer approached me and asked what the problem was in English and I explained the whole situation regarding the squatters and the damage that had been done, I then asked why they did not help Mr Kirk resolve this situation and was informed that the police didn't have the man power due to cuts and that Maurice was a well known crazy man that will be sent to an asylum .

I explained we had a booked ferry and that surely they could overlook this and try to understand his point of view but he insisted that he would have Maurice taken to a Hospital to be sent to an asylum.

I then left for St Malo.

27/01/2013

MORE PHOTOS LATER

I was locked up for a while and then taken to Pontivy hospital, central Brittany about 30 miles away.

The police tried to persuade the doctors, three of them, to admit me as a mental patient.

After 30 minutes or so more nurses arrived and one said,

It's the ‘flying vet' he was here to have a hip replacement, insisted he could fish from his room in the river below! ......he crept out far too soon after the operation on his crutches, in his pyjamas and flagged down a taxi and went off to the horse races!

What is he in here for?

Police said, to have him sectioned and sent to an asylum.

A huge amount of laughter followed with comments like, " You will have a job sectioning Maurice, he had the doctor (Dr Maimar?) in fits of laughter with his stories of flying old French wooden aircraft, with out paperwork, out of Pontivy across the channel, some 30 years ago.

I was then forcefully dumped in police vehicle driven back to Merdrignac where I was locked up until 9 am next morning.... Showed with questions, refused any paperwork (South Wales Police style) and kicked out.

The three month trial is booked Feb 18^th but with crutial hearing on Wed 30^th Jan for the issuing of 60 odd witness summonses on top of their 70 or so police defending/ including Barbara Wilding and rogue psychiatrist I am not allowed to name.

Interesting, this is the fourth or fifth time booked to start in past 12 years only for myto be mysteriously locked in prison each time just weeks before the trial is due to start.

‘machine gun ‘ 2009 trial

breach of Dr restraining order 2012

now this

Interesting, a solicitor, purportedly helping me......disappears off the map for weeks before Christmas. And now 15 e-mails all at once with clear indication my Tues 28^th Jan divorce case, machine gun case, rogue NHS psychiatrist (both one million pound claims) are being discussed with him with kept entirely in the dark with all parties ignoring my e-mails phone calls etc etc

It stinks , doesn't it?

WHAT IS GOING ON?

26th January 2013

I visit my ex wife's divorce lawyers to try and settle some issues on valuations etc to simplify court hearing tomorrow.

No chance!!!

I therefore send a missive to an intersted party at short notice:

27th Jan 2013

-- I have only recieved your e-mail this week end, to read, due to squatters getting into our second home, St Doha France and my being sectioned under the French Mental Health Act regulations just 30 miinutes after talking to Morgan Cole, solicitors, re 30th Jan 13 Cardiff County Court hearings re machine gun scandal, before the imminent three month trial judge to apply for witness summonses to be issued.

Clearly, the age old based conspiracy, between barristers in 9 Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, specific senior police in area police stations, certain law firms in Cardiff and judges serving both in the civil and/or criminal Cardiff courts means new evidencew has come to light re the police forensic Caswell Clinic psychiatrist, Barbara Wilding and abuse surrounding my MAPPA level 3 registration and police repainted Lewis Machine Gun.

This, together with serious valuation irregularities having been commented upon in my divorce hearing, due tomorrow, by the case mangement judge, means that there are still further reasons why I need, in the interests of fair play, for all my cases being moved out of South Wales.

My latest blog on www.kirkflyingvet.com gives a hurried account of just how far the evilness I have witnessed , over the past twenty years, in Cardiff police stations, courts and prison, of the accepted nafarious practises by so many and now protecting a rogue doctor but only because he is in the pockets of the notorious South Wales Police.

I do not wish your attendance at court, tomorrow, if that is your intention, at such lateness and not even properly briefed.

Thankyou

MJK

HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC appears to be refusing, on 30th Jan, key witnesses in the February three month trial including, can you believe it, the 'Defendant', Barbara Wilding and her pet MAPPA forensic psychiatrist, the Clinical Director of Caswell Clinic, one time, now blaming me for him and his wife, Dr Janis Hilliear both being on the 'long term sick'!

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

South Wales Police now join the Trial Judge , it appears, to block MAPPA boss, Barbara Wilding and Caswell Clinic doctor, from giving evidence in 20 Year Running Police Bullying Case, all of us in court this Wenesday.....ALL INVITED

http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#inbox/139acf07d44503ab

Police Application to Block MAPP/ Machine Gun/ Barbara Wilding/ NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic Rogue doctor ( on the 'permanent sick' with his wife, Dr Janis Hillier, also of Caswell Clinic........blaming me for my harassment!

13 01 28 SWP.pdf

http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/13c8319c570ea450

GMC Refuse Police Psychiatrist Exposure re My Falsified Cardiff CrownTranscripts while NORMAN SCARTH at RCJ 23rd Jan Fights for Own Tape Recorder in Court

Maurice Kirk — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:38:00 GMT

NORMAN NEEDS YOU TO JOIN US AT ROYAL COURTS of JUSTICE HEARING THIS WEDNESDAY

Now hear this Cardiff Magistrates 1st Dec 11

Perversion of justice

11 11 15 BBC Any Answers.AMR

VN850036.WMA

13 01 20 Crown Prosecution Service ref 62EA0207711.doc

22nd Jan 13 Magistrates Application for Medical Attention

Today, at Cardiff Magistrates, with appropriate witnesses to give evidence to confirm later, I was allowed, but only by the presiding judge's ‘discretion' as he put it, to allow me to rely on tape recordings of previous summary hearings in my application to have urgent medical attention.

These obviously accurate tape recordings of proceedings proved premeditated criminal conduct by prosecution witnesses, the Crown Prosecution Service and the then presiding magistrate, District John Charles, in breach of ECHR Article 6.

Apart from my 21^st January 13 letter to the CPS, responding to its 15^th Jan letter, suggesting I bring proof to the court, I had served on an earlier, addressed to the Criminal Court of Appeal, summarising the years of ignored applications for basic disclosure, back to the 2010 ‘machine gun' jury trial, by the South Wales Police, simply for public documents to which I was entitled.

This, of course, is a major breakthrough in the argument for Litigants in Person taping one's own court cases, whether it is because one is a little deaf, as in the Norman Scarth Appeal, currently before the Criminal Court of Appeal on 23^rd January 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice or in my own current appeal conviction there, relating to the bizarre 4^th May 12 ‘Breach of a Restraining Order' conviction with expensive official transcripts devoid of critical conversations in the court room that day.

My ‘Restraining Order' was purported to have been handed down in that 1^st Dec 2011 magistrates hearing but within my library of Wales' way of administering ‘justice', so similar to my past experiences in Guernsey, all indicated a rampant abuse of process.

Today's case revealed the fact that, while the court downloaded my 21^st January 13 letter from my website, only because the CPS seemed to have difficulty finding their own copy, my original argument in the 1^st Dec 11 court, that I was not allowed my own legal representation, my papers defence or witnesses in court, it was the police psychiatrist, not me, doing the harassing when one cannot be accused of harassment when applying the same ‘rule of law' the CPS appeared to be relying upon.

Sub section 3 a) & c) of the 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act allows me to:

‘Pursue a course of conduct' to detect or prevent crime'.

Apart from false medical reports and written without appropriate qualifications, whilst in possession of contrary evidence, the MAPPA doctor continues to break the law.

Recently, by MG 11 police witness statement, which had me jailed for several months, he stated that I had been accosted by the police whilst I was committing further harassment at his home. I had also made several attempts to break into Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, to gain access to my medical records. He told the court I suffered ‘paranoid delusional disorder', believing the South Wales Police were bullying me, had ‘significant brain damage' and a possible brain tumour.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

A typical tape recording of Cardiff Magistrates catching the wide spread corruption in Cardiff courts by District Judge john Charles and CPS barrister David Gareth Evans (9 Park Chambers Cardiff)

A series of Cardiff court tapes will continue to be broadcast world wide on this web site and many others, to try and wake the country up as to how governmant policy now controls our courts to convict and not to be run by the 'rule of law'.>

John Hemming MP sets down Early Day Motion

re New Ban by The Judicial Executive Committee for Litigants in Person (LiPs) to listen and check court tapes against grossly inaccurate/ in Wales, manipulated and expensive transcripts.

Questions Judicial Executive Committe blocking LiPs access to Listening to Court Tapes!

14th Jan Questions in The House

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm130114/debtext/130114-0003.htm#1301155000202

Regular readers of this web site are, no doubt, aware it is not exactly ‘rocket science' to understand why the General Medical Council, concerning a South Wales Police forensic psychiatrist, Crown Prosecution Service acting for NHS (Wales) and South Wales Police ‘private' lawyers ALL wrote to me all on 15^th January13 to now affect the welfare of not just me but my family.

eg Letters from Crown Prosecution service, General Medical Council and south wales Police

13 0115 CPS re Vari F REDACTED.pdf

13 01 15 R12 Mr Kirk letter REDACTED.doc

NOW LISTEN AND WAKE UP; ....SOME ONE IN YOUR FAMILY MAY BE NEXT

Delt the Gulag Card?

Download 18th Jan16 Bristol

Radio re SOUTH WALES

PAEDOPHILIA

[ skip the first 5 minutes of recording]

http://bcfm.org.uk/category/shows/dialect-radio

My 13thJanuary13 letter to Their Lordships in the Royal Courts of Justice

relating to Norman Scarth's appeal this Wednesday, 23rd January at RCJ and to be used onTuesday, the day before, on 22nd January, at another ridiculous Cardiff Magistrates hearing, before District Judge Bodfan Jenkins, in order that I may, at last, receive medical attention......lunch, cas usual, is on me!

13 01 19 Criminal Court of Appeal.doc

VN850036.WMA MAGISTRATES RECORDING

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

£10,O00 REWARD

to find the Snatched

Haringey Council

MUSA Nigerian Children

Favour Tabitha Sarah Abraham Nesara Queen Eliz

and one more whose name, sorry, I forget

TO BE FLOWN

BACK TO

NIGERIA

(Parents in Prison)

DO NOT FORGET THE DeliberatelyDELAYED RCJ APPEAL MUSA Nigerian Family and Haringey Council snatched six Nigerian children to give the Authrority time to have them adopted

and lets not forget that lying little b**** of Coronation Street, whose name I also forget, who gave false evidence at the London trial causing the parents get seven years a piece

Christopher Booker Article

Christopher Booker in Action .pdf

This gun was painted silver by the South Wales Police to try and fool the jury but had to paint it back to black when I was acquitted thereby having to retrun it to the Lincolnshire air Museum who bought her from me a year BEFORE I was arrested!

please see the Musa case,the Baylis family, Norman Scarth, Maurice Kirk, Hollie Greig: http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com

my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com

facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn#!/butlin.cat.9

myspace: http://www.myspace.com/butlincat/blog
youtube: http://www.youtube.com/butlincat6

Welsh Flag to be burnt on Cardiff Court Steps?

Maurice Kirk — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:23:00 GMT

12 09 19 GMC Briefing REDACTED.pdf

South Wales NHS Psychiatrists and GPs to be Named Riding the ‘Gravy Train’.

27 November 2012 Last updated at 11:14

Port Talbot: Investigation after body of man, 19, found

The body of a 19-year-old man has been found in Port Talbot, say South Wales Police.

Officers say they are investigating the circumstances leading up to his death, but it is not being treated as suspicious.

The body of the man was discovered near Afan Wayshortly after 13:30 GMT on Monday.

The man's next of kin and the coroner have been informed. His name not been released by police.

My string of GPs since my acquittal from prison , on 9th Feb 2010 for trading in machine guns, included Cowbridge Health Centre, Cowbridge, Vale of Glamorgan, (patient for 18 years), Ravenscroft surgery, Barry, (patient until also nobbled) and my latest Barry GP, ALL very frightend to admit I never had a brain tumour as CASWELL CLINIC were NHS (wales) ordered to indicate to at least nine Cardiff judges, I was ' Mad, Bad and Dangerous to know' to their tax payer financed 'gravy train'.

When, in 1992, I told Mum and Dad I was buying a veterinary practice, in Wales, Mum cried and and Dad looked seriously disheartened.......now I know why.

..........Over the next few days evidence will be published on this blog and else where to indicate, to the unsuspecting general public, the extreme lengths to which HM Cardiff judges, HM Crown Prosecutors, HM court staff , HM prison and South Wales Police are prepared to stoop just to protect their lap dog NHS (Wales) doctors, essential for locking away, without trial, that injured section of the community who have witnessed too much, first hand, of the wide spread corruption in Cardiff’s Crown, County and Magistrates courts.

It has again been suggested the Welsh Flag needs to be burnt on the steps of Cardiff courts before the Royal Courts of Justice

12 12 11 Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal ref.doc

And for me it did not end there!

Once I was locked up in Caswell Clinic prison, quite terrified out of my mind, I watched the smooth operator of all corrupt NHS (Wales) psychiatrists, with his mate Professor Rodger Wood, from Swansea University, manoeuvre patients out of the ‘state financed system’ to their own lucrative private clinics dotted around South Wales.

http://www.swan.ac.uk/staff/academic/humanandhealthsciences/woodrodgerl/

Why doesn’t Port Talbot NHS (Wales) HQ do anything about it?

Why, because several doctors and key positioned executives have a financial interest in the very same private clinics.

The Welsh Assembly, now what are they doing about it? …..’Sweet Fanny Adams’, now there is an out of control conspiracy while they fight, behind closed doors, for their very own, but just out of reach, even more lucrative judiciary.

Yet another mysterious sad teenage suicide near Caswell Clinic, a few days ago, again with the wrong medical team implicated…..

I will start this blog with more trickled out 4^th May 12 transcripts, to tickle your fancy, as a sample of just how wicked Cardiff judges regularly are and in my cases always refusing me my legal papers from the cell below, access to my witnesses and , oh yes, and their little game in front of the jury, this time…….pretending to let me have my lap top computers back, to placate the jury but ,as uasual, lying through their evil filthy back teeth my never even being aloud to plug either

in!………

Next time you think of confiding in a doctor establish ,beyond reasonable doubt, your medical records are not then whisked out to tom *** and Harry…..listen to my next broadcast on 93.2 FM dialect Radio Bristol.

T20120090 - Kirk - proc from 10.40 - 12.26 - 04.05.12 REDACTED.pdf

;

Extracts from this transcript explained below as to what evil thoughts were going through their vindictive little minds to have me eliminated once and for all.

12 01 20 Remand Warrant &12 02 22 Judge Curran QC Court Order REDACTED.pdf

;

12 12 09 Blog re RO Appeal ref.doc

THE JURY NOTES TO JUDGE CURRAN QC WHO DELIBERATELY WITHELD THEM FROM ME BECAUSE OF THEIR PREDICTABLE CONTENT...

.12 12 08 EXTRACT FOR ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE APPEAL.doc

12 12 04 SWP High Court Consolidation Application REDACTED.doc

12 03 09 Consolidation appl.pdf

Watch this space

Mean while,

IPCC

09 07 08 SWP Refusal Investgn.pdf

12 08 20 MJK MG11 Redacted shr.pdf

12 09 14 CPS Cmn Assault Discontinuance.pdf

12 10 04 CPS Br Rest Order discontinuance.pdf

GMC

Criminal Court of Appeal

12 12 10 Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal Court of Appeal ref.doc

12 04 20 Crt12 0425 Judge 12 09 07 CPS ALL IGNORED.pdf

09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans.pdf

Welsh Assembly

Alun Cairns MP

HM Government

and YOU, appear to be doing little about it

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

As I read incoming e-mails, about the South Wales Police, John wilson knocks the subject on the head , again......of things to come?

http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/13b76ff5c1e5b9c5

12 09 19 GMC Briefing REDACTED.pdf

Maurice Kirk Sectioned under 1983 Mental Health Act with Application for Ashworth High Security Prison for Life

Maurice Kirk — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:12:00 GMT

EXAMPLE ONE

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

This Caswell Clinic psychiatric report was used to keep me
in prison for eight months, in 2009, destroying my marriage, prior to ‘machine
gun' case when the police helicopter and armed police stormed our home to
arrest me and attempt to snatch my then 10 year old daughter with Social
Services.

On release I was then jailed, using the very same
psychiatric report, on three separate occasions in London,
by the Metropolitan Police, twice in Oxford
and eight times in Cardiff.

Each time, in England but not Wales, following my presentation before three London courts and one Oxford court, while I was unrepresented, I was released.

With all allegations dropped, safe one, a ‘public order offence'm another conspiracy.

That case was heard in my absence with the Cardiff
authorities deliberately preventing my production from Cardiff prison as it
related to the Musa Nigerian six children
having been snatched by Haringey Council, my being a major witness into the
huge lawyer fraud surrounding this case and to scupper the chances of their own very
frightened clients [see previous blogs/ gallery and downloads].

But the Welsh police and their very own incestuous and thoroughly corrupt judiciary had a
completely separate agenda, the details of which are legendary.

18th November 2012 2nd CAR BREAK IN

12 11 18 IPCC.doc

This Friday's 2pm Bristol broadcast is planned to name names

http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/63665

EXAMPLE TWO

http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/welsh-jurisdiction-039cart-without-a-horse039?utm_source=emailhosts&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=GAZ+16%2F11%2F2012

EXAMPLE THREE

9^th Oct 2012 JUDGMENT

The European Court of Human Rights delivered a new and remarkable judgment on trade union freedom of expression. In Szima v. Hungary the European Court of Human Rights concluded that a criminal conviction of a leader of a police trade union for having posted critical and offensive comments on the Union’s website was to be considered necessary in a democratic society for the prevention of disorder or crime, and more precisely of preserving order in the armed forces

EXAMPLE FOUR

FROM latest issue of PRIVATE EYE

i.e. South Wales Police and Cardiff Judiciary's Lynette White murder cover up.

“Justice

Wails from Wales

For nearly a year a police force has refused to return a journalist’s work on one of Britain’s most notorious miscarriages of justice, despite repeated requests.

Satish Sekar cooperated with police, allowing officers investigating the wrongful arrests of the Cardiff Five two decades ago access to his own investigation. Sekar has covered the case and its fall-out for many years, including for Private Eye.

Officers borrowed material, including taped interviews, for use in the police corruption trial on the strict understanding it would be returned as soon as the trial ended. That trial ended last December in farcical circumstances as the judge decided the eight former police officers couldn’t get a fair hearing because evidence files had been destroyed.

Although the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and the Director of Public Prosecutions are still investigating the trial, Sekar asked South Wales Police to return his property, not least because he was finishing a book about the case. Although Sekar told police chiefs his voluntary cooperation with the force was over, the police have now prevaricated for 11 months and, despite the lack of a court order or it being the proceeds of crime, police still have his material.

They ignore solicitors letters and refuse to explain what entitles them to keep Sekar’s property. “If anyone else had done this they would be arrested for theft”, says Sekar. Police now refuse to talk to Sekar, even though the IPCC has ordered them to record his complaint.”

EXAMPLE FIVE

Aftermath of my 2010 Cardiff 'machine gun' trial acquittal.

In June 2009 helicopter and twenty five other police, many armed, storm our home and jail me for eight months without a shread of evidence of any fire arms offences. As later proved, it was the Chief Constable's private solicitors, Dolmans, who instigated my imprisonment to prejudice the forthcoming three month civil damages trial, she being the defendent !

Thee years later, despite my numerous attempts to retrieve police snatched £10,000 worth of antigue and licenced legally held shot guns and humane killers, the thoroughly corrupt Cardiff cabal have, instead, refused their return and ordered, by that deceitful District Judge Bodfan Jenkins, to pay the cabal a bill of £4000 costs following my attempted use the courts and1897 Police Property Act just to return my property!

EXAMPLE SIX

Between 1992 and 2002 the South Wales Police ordered me to produce my driving documents 35 times. On the 34th occasion I refused and the court was forced, under the then Magistrates Act, to dismiss the case.

I have refused five times since with the police doing nothing about it as they had already complained to The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and succsessfully had me struck off the veterinary register.

EXAMPLE SEVEN

I, Christopher Alexander (Ebbs) wish to add to my previous statement, on the matter of Maurice Kirk's common assault conviction at Bristol Magistrates, that I was approached by the South Wales Police to ware a neck brace and sit at the back of the court throughout proceedings while he was remanded to prison.

YOU maybe you are asking yourselves, the tax payer, why GMC, IPCC, an outside police force and HM Govenment Departments all continue to sit twiddling their toes while South Wales' nemesis looms before them in early 2013.

It stinks, doesn't it?

Why? These culprits are all on huge protected salaries and pensions paid by you.

So, why have they not had me killed, three years later, with the three month trial looming?

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

SO WHO IS MAD?

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/around_the_world/Haverford-West-Preparation.aspx

Trying to re live Sir Francis Chichester's world breaking record and without a map?

The cub flew a world record of her own, via Norfolk Island, direct to Coolangata, Queensland.

(Liberty Girl on a lonely windswept beach on the tip of North Island New Zealand preparing for Queensland)

2013 London to Sydney Air Race list of pilots and their contacts

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/around_the_world/Race-Pilots-meet-after-11-years.aspx

Nazi Uniform for Royal Courts of Justice Welsh Cover Up listen to Bristol Radio 93.2 FM

Maurice Kirk — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:38:00 GMT

Bristol Radio's FIRST Interview was this Friday at 2pm with the SECOND planned in about three weeks. Download Recording http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/63665

This site and radio broad cast are likely to also broad cast, shortly, the taped telephoned messages, I did not realise were being taken at the time, of me trying to get urgent messages out of Cardiff Prison to my friends, relations and fellow Mackenzie Friends. South Wales Police/MAPPA and opposing civil solictiors, Dolmans, for the imminent three month damages trial, were assisting in my mail being diverted, in or out and or delayed while awaiting a couple of trials and further allegations re Restaining Order were being concocted.

Anything to black mail me into confiding in a local Welsh lawyrer.

Sometimes ten prisoners or more would be queueing for one or two phones that worked , mainly only available out of office hours with only 30 minutes or as much as an hour , some days, to reach the head of the queue.

http://www.onetruemedia.com/otm_site/view_shared?p=1075eac32e598b21dbaf54d&skin_id=1702&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

I resorted, often, to bribery with tobacco and chocolate saved for the purpose, to jump the que ue but it was rare to succeed as they were as frustrated as I was, especially the unconvicted doing their own case.

The next interview may cover the appallingt Chanel Islands and their obscene interpretation of Human Rights.

I often dressed appropriately for Guernsey's magistrates wearing florescent orange socks, for example, that looked impressive when I was filmed by Channel Televion while arriving at court in Nazi uniform:

+ http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

His Lordshp's missive in the post, this very Thursday morning, means my Nazi uniform needs an an airing at the Royal Courts of Justice very shortly.

So, there you have it, ladies and gentlemen,

You notice the defendant did not attend as a for gone conlusion, with the action against one of those in HM Partnership

I was not there because I had a medical note, as not fit, following my being recently knocked unconscious, I was told, in the street anf finishing up in hospital.

Mr Justice Beatson not only ignored the medical certificate, appeared to lose his temper lost his temper, as neither party was present and struck out the application as totally wuithout merit.

He, as with well over one hundred before him in the RCJ, I had witnessed had done, had expedited it in nano seconds.

Ah, but he linked his decision to my other JR outstanding application over the ridiculous harassment hearings and CPS fiddled Crown Court appeal.

Thursday was spent running around the RCJ between Admin courts and Criminaal Court of Appeal slowly unravelling the conspiracy,still cooking, to have me and my helpersw eliminated.

Just what will the Principality consider next in order to protect their errant NHS forensic psychiatrists and thoroughly corrupt judiciary?

A quick chat with my London Mentor, Isambard Kingdom Brunel, something that has become a bit of a ritual, over the years, before wasting any further of my time in that den of vice in The Strand.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Nicholas-Cooke-QC.aspx

11 01 03 Machine Gun Case summary[1].pdf

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Not-Guilty.aspx

11 05 08 ECH MJK letter .pdf

But hold it, Maurice, don't panic, don't panic. Lets wait for the judgments and transcripts, below, to arrive and put them also up on web site and ponder, again, the viewers' e-mail and posting of comments responses.

Ist e-mail response:

can i add this to the email below to send out? - it is ur call after u were beaten in Cardiff prison last year = pls reply asap.

http://www.onetruemedia.com/otm_site/view_shared?p=fb45700340208e91132c80&skin_id=1009&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

Some Issues for RCJ

Criminal Court of
Appeal Restraining Order/Harassment Conviction

Restraining Order is dated 1^st December
2011, (Magistrate's version)

‘Breach of Restraining Order' is 4^th
December 2011, no evidence yet seen of it.

‘Due Service' of Restraining Order was 23^rd
December 2011, pushed under police cell door

Restraining Order, as Exhibit, dated 9^th
Dec 2012 (Crown Court's version)

Drafting of the R/O audit trail clearly indicates
there was no such final document in existence at the ‘lunch time', as confirmed
by both court and custody logs, when clerk of the court hid in an empty adjacent
cell to ‘observe' security guard unlock and enter my cell to obtain my ‘opinion'
of a partly hand written document, seen by my gallery witnesses, being written
by the presiding judge and to be returned to the CPS with my comments.

Meanwhile I will continue my near twenty year quest to find a lawyer I can trust and so conduct the interrogation of around one hundred South Wales policemen, in the bullying case, due to give evidence, for a few months, shortly after Christmas.....see downloads etc

An e-mail, securing legal representation, at last, sent BEFORE my opening today's 18th October post

17th October 2012

Dear ,,,,,,,,

Criminal Court of Appeal 201203241 D2 and JR CO/2012/ 6357

Application to Join the above RCJ cases

Further to your daughter confirming on the phone, yesterday, you have informed the RCJ you are acting for me in these two cases, I confirm I have not yet found a barrister but asked that you again approach the Midlands based Mr Spence? who spoke to me in the Oxford Crown Court.

The 2nd May 2012 ending jury trial GROUNDS [Breach of Restraining Order] carried almost identical 'grounds', with respects to ''abuse of process', as in the JR 'grounds' for the original magistrates' ending 1st December 2011 hearing [Harassment conviction] and appeaL ending on 2nd March 2012 .

Mr Justice MacDuff's helpful statement in single judgment indicates same

I ask , again, for confirmation in writing in order to stop ringing the RCJ daily

Thankyou

The judge Curren's summing up and witness, Lee Barker, transcripts will be available on or after 31st October

best regards,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Puits aux Papillions

St Doha

22230 Merdrignac

Tomorrow, Friday 19th Oct, a series of Bristol Community Radio 93.2 FM interviews are to be broad cast with Tony Gosling.

Please do not be misled by the first issue, by way of an introduction, comparing an English police, judicial system and HM prisons to the appalling situation in South Wales.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Magna-Carta-Day.aspx

2nd e-mail in today :

"YOU WILL NEVER BEAT THEM, MAURICE"

I give an example of just how right she might be:

This e-mail stimulates me to give a typical sample, I have personally encountered, of just how the Cardiff court's inherent culture, based on deceit and avarice, will continue to reign supreme while their immunity to prosecution rests with the South Wales Police.

Any of my past IPCC complaints, for example, have always reverted back to the culprits to investigate themselves!

If any of you, in England, Scotland or Ireland, are contemplating crossing the Seven Bridge, as I did, to work , get married and settle down, assuming Wales is 'fit for purpose', then please stop and think.

I didn't, making my mother cry and father very saddened by the news.

10 10 29 Prison 50 000 summary (2).pdf

10 9 1 MJK Prison Statement for County Judge Final.rtf

And finally some extra light reading on the sinister world of HM Partnership and as to how they hold almost all the cards.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/hm_tax_haven__channel_islands/default.aspx

Subject:

Signing up to 'I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK' at PledgeBank.com

Please click on the link below to confirm your signature on the
pledge at the bottom of this email.

http://www.pledgebank.com/L/BVyQLvFuTJTaBt79hA

The pledge was created by Patrick Cullinane and reads:

'I will I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the
Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st
October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of
JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK but only if 150 other
people from the UK will do the same. We the People in the UK
have been denied our GUARANTEED RIGHTS to due-process via the
Common Law Trial by Jury, which is the Law of the Land.'

Yours,
the PledgeBank.com team

ends