Legal Battles : Prison

Seven Years for Child Cruelty and a Lying little Coronation St Actress Michelle Collins

Maurice Kirk — Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:25:00 GMT

Where I would simply say this actress is a BL**DY LIAR because her conversation, at her door of her house, was tape recorded and the rest is a fairy tale. Her subsequent conduct was also witnessed by several, including my self when I took photograghs anticipating the shallow attitude such a woman would make of this family's tragedy.

Sabine best puts it well when writing to the gutter press:

Dear Anissa Haddadi

Given your article of 14th August, I presume that you were neither in court nor have you visited the parents in prison, let alone the children in ‘care’.

I must assume that you were simply copying a press release, and I am most curious to learn who issued it. Who is benefitting, besides Michelle Collins, one must wonder?

I don’t want to go into the details that are simply wrong in this one case, except for the most outrageous claims of ‘possessed by evil spirits’. Please watch the mother, an ordained Bishop, in her passionate preaching to know otherwise.

As publisher of Victims Unite, I had received many emails about the Musas before starting a website to publicise their ordeal, whilst caring for my mum in Germany. Eventually, I received a ‘gagging order’ from Haringey Council – the third one to wear with pride... For I’m a systems analyst, mathematician and computer scientist. I look at Punishment without Crime and note that the Musa case is acknowledged to be the worst of all child snatching cases known to all experts in the field.

Why should International Business Times be interested in either Michelle Collins, Haringey Council, Nigerians or child snatching? Or is it simply the summer trough that needs to be filled with sensationalism?

Still, should you be interested in more biased, truthful and ultimately investigative reporting, I’d be happy to supply you with more information, including a photo of the 23 files of documentation that Haringey Council produced to keep some lawyers busy...

Who benefits, must always be the overriding question, it seems.

With kind regards,

Sabine

http://gloriamusa.wordpress.com/2012/08/14/trying-to-make-sense-of-irrational-behaviour-and-decisions/

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/august152012/musa-sentence-jg.php

Post prior to sentencing:

Blog Private Prosecution on the UK Judicial System.docx

STOP PRESS

Mr and Mrs Musa are to appeal their conviction and sentence

Gloria Musa is too ill to see visitors in prison.

Today the Holloway Prison concocted excuses, varied as repeated, that a wheel chair was not available....post parturent bleeding, cannot walk etc etc

12 08 13 JG Musa THE ATTEMPTED VISIT TO GLORIA MUSA SUN.pdf

Westminster Magistrates Wednesday.....be there also

Dear ALL!!!

ONE WEEK WARNING.....!!!!!!!!!!

2nd Private Criminal Prosecution - FIRST APPEARANCE WEDNESDAY 15TH AUGUST 2012 AT 10AM

The first appearance of Metropolitan Police officers Sergeant Gareth Blackburn and Detective Constable Stephen MacDonald will be before;

Westminster Magistrates Court
181 Marylebone Road,
London,
NW1 5BR
Tel: 020 3126 3050

Nearest tube :- Marylebone or Baker street

I have confirmed with the court all is on for next Wednesday. As you will all be aware this is a historic case in which the officers concerned have been summoned for the following offences;

- kidnap (max sentence life imprisonment)

- false imprisonment (max sentence life imprisonment)

- aggravated burglary (max sentence life imprisonment)

- burglary (max sentence 14 yrs imprisonment)

- affray (max sentence 3yrs imprisonment)

- Misconduct in public office (max sentence life imprisonment)

The hearing at Westminster will be simply to 'send' the case to the Crown Court. Most likely Southwark Crown Court.The BBC have confirmed coverage of this case, cameras will be rolling outside the court house. Do try to attend if you can as this case could have massive implications. Bring placards and banners and show your concern for the failure of the state to hold the police to account.

If you haven't seen the Guardian coverage of this, please see here;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jul/15/police-accused-kidnap-private-prosecution

See you all there!!!!!!

The discredited Independent Police Complaints Commission

As many of you are aware, I have reported that the Deputy Chair of the IPCC, Deborah Glass to the police for perverting the course of justice and misconduct in public office. The nature of the offence relates to evidence I presented which demonstrates a willful failure to investigate the criminal conduct of the Metropolitan Police. (effectively the supposed primary purpose of her role)

I have had confirmation from the Metropolitan police in two letters that this investigation is indeed underway. The crime reference attached to this case is CRIS 2314237/12 and is being investigated by the 'Specialist and Economic Crime unit SC09'.

These supported facts went out in a press release stating that the Deputy Chair of the IPCC was currently under criminal investigation as of the 3Aug2012.

Predictably the IPCC then issued threats of legal action if a retraction is not made, typical bullies using public money to threaten us into silence. Well I suggest you may wish to email amanda.kelly@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Director of Business Services and tell her what you think of the IPCC. Maybe you also think there should be a full criminal investigation of their role in covering up the criminal behavior of the Police.

If Deborah Glass wishes to take me to the High Court for a defamation case then she can be my guest. I am happy to confirm that I reported her for what I believe is criminal conduct, the cover up of clear blatant criminal behavior of the Met Police. I am happy to confirm my communications with the Police, that they have confirmed that this criminal investigation is underway.

Should the case go ahead (which I doubt very much, even they wouldn't be that stupid) I will be calling upon other victims of the IPCC to give evidence of the IPCC and their cover up of police criminal conduct.

Ms Glass states that the fact she is under criminal investigation is 'damaging to her reputation'. I would suggest as the head of a widely discredited organisation, her reputation is like that of the IPCC, severely under doubt. Indeed if she was an honorable individual she would have tackled police criminality when presented to her.

Indeed if the IPCC think this is not the case, I guess their problem lays with the Metropolitan Police and their communication on the matter. Maybe they could put in a complaint....... see how far they get with that! lol

Defamation case

The Metropolitan Legal team still need more time, always delaying and the window for mediation rapidly closes.

Parliamentary Inquiry into the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)

The Parliamentary Inquiry into the IPCC has started back in July with it's first hearing. Giving evidence was a representative from the Police Action Lawyers Group (PALG), Deborah Coles from INQUEST and Doreen Lawrence (mother of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence).

They were scathing of the performance of the IPCC......

Finally, the new head of the IPCC, Dame Anne Owers gave evidence. She was instantly made aware that the committee had already heard some very serious criticism of the IPCC. Dame Anne Owers was very much on the back foot and offering her own ideas on reform of this much maligned organisation.

My opinion remains, the IPCC must be abolished, a new organisation formed made entirely of civilian investigators. I am willing to take up the post of head of investigations. I will be fearless and act without favor in my pursuit of criminals acting in the post of constable.

A number of people have now been called to give evidence infront of the Committee, including our much loved fellow campaigner Ian Puddick.

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/home-affairs-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/ipcc/

SEAN RIGG INQUEST

I have been attending the Inquest into the death of SEAN RIGG at the hands of the Metropolitan Police in Brixton Police station. SEAN's death happened in August 2008, like all deaths at the hands of the police, the families are facing an uphill battle to find the truth behind the death.

The inquest was shocking and the jury, much to their credit, delivered a damning verdict against the metropolitan Police for their involvement in the death of Sean. For example they stated;

"whilst Sean Rigg was in custody, the police failed to uphold his basic rights"

Still, everyone of those officers is still in full employment with the Met police, indeed many have had promotion. Of course once again the IPCC's hand in covering up the circumstances behind the death of Sean is evident. It is alleged that on the evening of Sean's death, IPCC investigators' attended Brixton police station and in conjunction with Met police professional standards officers instructed all police involved NOT to make any statement about events!!!!!!

This is clearly so that they can prepare statements once they have gathered all evidence, statements to present a benign narrative to events. Of course, officers were caught lying on oath at the Inquest. (there is currently a separate investigation into this) As with all lies, they have short legs and generally go belly up under the slightest of scrutiny.....

The Rigg family are an inspiration and a true example to all those fighting the injustice of police corruption. I met Sam Rigg about 3yrs ago and from her impassioned speech about her brother's death, you could instantly see she and her family have what you need to get behind the police lies and uncover the truth.

Please support the Rigg's in their continued quest for both justice and accountability.

Police accountability

I attended the very interesting evening put on by "Defend the Right to Protest" titled 'policing on trial - How do we get justice?'

I suggested we ignore the IPCC and they sham police investigations into their own conduct and prosecute them in the criminal courts ourselves. Quite simply this is the only way, as with all SELF REGULATION, it never works.

You can watch the evenings presentations here;

http://www.defendtherighttoprotest.org/defend-the-right-to-protest-public-forum-recording/

Hope to see many of you at Westminster Magistrates on the 15th August at 10am,

Michael Doherty

JUST IN ON E-MAIL from John Graham

hi -

Helen called Marcus and the asst. solicitor has pointed out
that we should get Glorias side to what happened today Sunday 12 Aug at
Holloway prison during the planned visit with her. I must say this may be the
only time ive actually listened to what the guy has said.

Perhaps we should wait and see what Gloria has to say on
Tuesday, or if nothing is forthcoming, reassess the appalling situation then.
This does not help her get medical treatment though, which must be urgent if
she is issuing blood clots from her stomach. The prison is clearly covering
things up perhaps in the hope she disappears completely out of their
jurisdiction in the worst possible way. Helen says she has not heard from her
since Tuesday - perhaps as she cant get to the phone and the employees refuse
to help her get to the phone, or let her have the use of a wheelchair.

jg.

excuse typos from my phone - sent earlier:

The screws lied thru their teeth ane the knew since tuesday
to make arrangements for or to notifying us of cancelling the visit. If she has
seen the medic who says she is fine they say how come she wasnt produced today
in a wheelchair which attard says theo have? She has not been heard of since
tuesday when she called helen and she doesnt know to call the new solicitor urgently
which we were to tell her today

Here is something seriously wrong. please tell all media / everybody. myseif,heather
and helen went to holloway today but they refused to bring gloria saying she
refused to come on the visit and she was well enough. the truth is they refused
to give her a wheelchair or bring her there. she cannot walh now and is
bleeding blood clots which they are denying. wf waited the entire hour wiile
they made excuses and even an asst governer turned up called attard who said
they had wheelchairs whilf the screws said she couldnt be brought because they
had no wchairs. they are refusing her medicgl treatment but are saying shes had
it and is fine but she cant get to the phone foi 5 days, is feeling giddy and
is bleeding blood clots and cant walk and needs urgent treatment. tiease help.
have told maurice who is thinking what to do.

Here is something seriously wrong. Please tell all media everybody. myseif,heather and helen went to
holloway today but they refused to bring gloria saying she refused to come on
the visit and she was well enough. the truth is they refused to give her a
wheelchair or bring her there. she cannot walh now and is bleeding blood clots
which they are denying. wf waited the entire hour wiile they made excuses and
even an asst governer turned up called attard who said they had wheelchairs
whilf the screws said she couldnt be brought because they had no wchairs.

They are refusing her medicgl treatment but are saying shes had it and is fine but
she cant get to the phone foi 5 days, is feeling giddy and is bleeding blood
clots and cant walk and needs urgent treatment. tiease help. have told maurice
who is thinking what to do.

jg -- I sent this from my 3 mobile

FROM HEATHER

Lynne
I got home at half past eight
As I said to Helen and John although I did not manage to see Gloria the visit was not completely wasted as I have now been completely convinced re the ongoing corruption at Holloway

We got through the screening process without any problems and sat down in the Visitors Hall. Gloria was nowhere to be seen. I asked a female warder at the desk whether Gloria would be coming soon and she said she was ringing to see what was the problem. This fair-haired prison officer ( John has her number)said she was able to walk but would not. I asked whether they had any wheelchairs and was told no. We sat down and had a cup of tea and Helen advised that we should stay to end of the session so that the authorities couldn't say she turned up after we went.We noticed two extra people were positioned near to us. John and Helen went and asked to speak to someone higher and were pointed in the direction of one of these people , a Mr Attard. I thought three people might have been a bit much so when John came to sit down I went up to him. He told me they DID have wheelchairs and apparently according to him she had been seen by medical services the previous day and told she was fine. I explained that I had worked as a biomedical scientist and if that was the case she must have had a haemoglobin and an x-ray to be able to say this. Ok, I know, but by this time these people were really irritating me. Then I got the privacy of information bit. We just left at the end of the session.

Helen had previously said Don Marcus was going to visit Gloria on Saturday. After she left she rang him but couldn't get through. I should imagine she will ring tomorrow. We needed to know whether he had visited, whether he had seen Gloria and also had she been in a wheelchair.
My mind is now going round in circles trying to decide what to do next. Helen has said that she is very worried as the last time she spoke to her which I think was Tuesday Gloria wasn't very coherent and was saying she was feeling dizzy.These are symptoms of anaemia.

Lynne will speak to you tomorrow and hopefully by that time will have a reply from Helen with the info re Don Marcus's visit.

Heather

Where Was the Defence?

Maurice Kirk — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:54:00 GMT

Only at 1430 were documents served on Maurice which the Judge had agreed to let Maurice have the day before. These had been listed as undisclosed on the schedule that arrived at M's 'hotel' 2 days before the start of the trial. These included 'e's initiated by CPS to Brian Woodford who is on the run from the CIA and who sold the DH-2 aeroplane in 1997 to MJK.

These omitted the CPS parts but due to MJK's persistence, HHJ Thomas ordered the CPS to release the RAF Lynham emails too, which confirmed what their forensic gun expert said in questioning from MJK that: under the '68 Act the responsibility rests with the Military, if a firearm is passed to a civilian that a) the civilian is a licence holder andb) that the item is appropriately certified.

These emails were dated 12th August and 26th August. It was obvious that the South Wales Police maliciously withheld this evidence. Before they were released the Judge had discussed them in chambers with the Prosecution Council.

But where was the defence? In a cell under the court.

News From Prison

Maurice Kirk — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:24:00 GMT

Civil Court Judge has ordered the South Wales Police to produce the 52 files for Maurice but when they eventually arrived the Prison Authorities refused to give any to him. At last, with more delay, they have allowed him access to 6 files at a time (so no cross-referencing possible) and each batch available every day or so thus meaning he has no time to prepare for his criminal case which starts 25^th Jan. He is still being denied his laptop on which he has filed evidence.

Because he has recently won a case for excessive physical restraint against Reliance, the firm employed to move prisoners from Prison to court, hospital etc, they have seen to it that he has even more restrictions placed on his visiting rights.

Civil Proceedings Lodged

Maurice Kirk — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:48:00 GMT

Maurice started his Civil Proceedings against the South Wales Police this morning in the County Court.

The Solicitors, acting for the Police, admitted in court that they had no copy of their complaint to the Police against Maurice which led to his arrest on 22^nd June. He had been accused of threatening to throw the bundle of witness exchange papers into the building, as he was not allowed in and they would not accept them.

Further, the Judge has ordered the Police to identify the police officers involved over the last 20 years in over 100 incidents where they have proof of which ones were involved.

NOTES FROM DIARY

Maurice Kirk — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:51:00 GMT

Remand Prisoner Kirk BM8473

HM Prison

Cardiff

South Wales

NOTES FROM DIARY

Tuesday 03 November 2009

CRIMINAL PROCEDURES (INSANITY) ACT 1964

0853 PO refuses to inform me whether it is police, probation or lawyer booked in for 9am for 2 hours 15 minutes. Refuses to indicate which (7) court case, which files to carry to visitors compound. ‘Until you get there cannot tell you'.

0914 Different PO states it's a psychologist from High Security Ashworth Psychiatric Hospital Liverpool. I repeat I need proper notice, proof of identity, tape recorded and/or independent witness. (All in writing to authorities on countless previous occasions)

Refuse? No.

0915 Locked up in cell. Write hurried letter to Dr?

0918 Medication called. Let out to medical orderlies - refused again, diclofenac tabs for arthritis (8^th day). Queue dominated by prisoners for either methadone and/or screaming to be sent to Caswell Clinic!

0940 Original PO refused who/why Dr from HM Ashworth?

Locked up.

SO and PO explains psychiatrist from Ashworth from Court order of 26 October (HHJ Eleri Rees)

I hand letter to SO to copy and deliver to Psychiatrist, stating I am not refusing, I require a minimum of 24 hours notice, taped, witnessed.

‘This is my 9^th psychiatrist' signed.

0952 Copied and returned.

10.30 Dr at cell with healthcare manager to ‘assess fit to plead and stand trial'.

XE on who is behind all this abuse.

Dr admits never experienced a case re ‘fit to plead' but ‘not fit to stand trial without legal representation'.

Seen explanation on my website? Dr answered (later)

Seen my medical records neither I nor my GP can get? Dr answered (later).

What law are they trying now ‘because they failed miserably on Section 35 1983 Mental Health Act? Dr answered (later)

10.50 Dr. court can say ‘not fit (no challenge of Dr William's 4 psychiatric reports or release of my medical records)

11.08 Are you fit to instruct any lawyer?

Dr promises ‘bundle of papers' from Crown Court. I explain I have had all these sort of promises from Cardiff Judges in the past and invariably ‘a pack of lies'.

I won't get it, meaning all the correspondence between Judges and CPS and Caswell Clinic and HMCS and MAPPA and Justice Ministry and other gulags in South Wales (Whitchurch and Llanarth Psychiatric Hospitals, Swansea and Cardiff Universities, where so many previous psychiatric reports originated).

I ask Dr. did you actually ask to see my medical ‘history'?

Reply ‘They could not find MJK medical records.

Dr: How did all this start?

Suggest he read my 64 page witness statement dated 19 June 09 written ‘just for an occasion as this' once I realised all the South Wales Police had left, following the signing of the Chief constable's 25 Feb 09 sworn affidavit.

Documents given to Dr.

2003 HM internal memo by Treasury Solicitors and HM Attorney General Re: Vexatious Litigant.
Caswell Clinic internal memos (also see website)
MJK 19 June 09 witness statement. For civil action Re Covert Police Surveillance
Chicago USA, Psychiatrist Report in Rebuttal (off website)

Dr: Have you ever threatened violence?

‘I was picked for public school 7 aside rugby finals at Twickenham'

Both Caswell Clinic and Cardiff Court refuse to remove falsely reported conviction of ABH on their record just as the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons in 2002, laboured under false information, again supplied by South Wales Police with ‘intent'.

I ask the Dr "where is the element of ‘intent' in my current predicament now facing an IPP prison sentence of indeterminate length for public protection?"

"For public protection or for yet another Judge, on 2 December, at last quashing my Civil Action, on 10 January 2010 and blocking the machine gun case, never ever intended to see the light of day?"

11.32 Dr leaves cell a little better informed stating he needed to return.

Every cloud?