Legal Battles : McKenzie Friends, Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

3rd Week of South Wales Police B ullying Trial with Avon and Somerserset Police on First

Maurice Kirk — Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:08:00 GMT

Maurice Refused a Jury

Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police                                                                                               BS 614159

11^th Day

Monday 4^th March13

Claimant Position Statement

Applications for Consideration

1.       Defendant ordered, to be produced today , the 27 written complaints, as a written list, currently in possession of Defendant and referred to by former Inspector Sydney Griffiths during his cross examination.

2.       Result from those written complaints, identified on the list, to be disclosed.

3.       Claimant awaits the findings of his other complaints, mainly of non disclosure, not being identified by the Claimant, such as court cases with Claimant being the successful victim and police instigated ‘break ins’ to his various veterinary surgeries and places of residence.

4.       Incidents, referred to in paragraph 3., are absent from Barbara Wilding’s 25^th February 2009 sworn affidavit, prepared by Dolmans and signed six weeks late by her, then as Chief Constable, despite the specific court orders by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC.

5.       Identification required of which Defendant witness relates to which of Claimant’s 52 leaver arch files given to Defendant,, to copy and so expedite proceedings, as there is now total confusion deliberately caused by Dolmans, solicitors, by having masked out the Claimant’s indices on each spine on every file!

6.       52 files were originally prepared and marked by Claimant’s secretary before they were disclosed as Claimant exhibits for South Wales Police to copy and to ‘settle out of court’.

7.       Claimant is seeking a ‘Medical afternoon’ before or after 3pm’, at the court’s convenience, this week, in order to find a GP, with which to register, well out of South Wales.

8.       The Claimant cannot proceed with cross examination until Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) and the Defendant produce both male psychiatrist’s falsely written and his Dr wife’s section 9 statements created, to adversely affect the Claimant, since 2009, in this trial.

9.       Following orders from Barbara Wilding , to cause the forensic psychiatrist(s) to attend Barry police station, at very short notice , to attend and contribute in the 8^th June MAPPA level 3 meeting, not to inform their victim, the Claimant was so registered and should the Claimant approach the Defendant again, to attempt ‘witness statements exchange’ he was ‘likely to be shot’ ‘.[quote from MAPPA contemporaneous notes taken at the time]

10.   The doctor’s 2012 victim MG 11witness statements are partly dictated and counter signed.

11.   That , alone, has caused the Claimant to be detained in numerous police stations, law courts and HM prisons due to one doctors and NHS (Wales) facing my million pound damages claim citing Barbara Wilding and her agents in the conspiracy.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

I was originally awarded a jury trial by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, nearly 10 years ago, against the bullying South Wales Police over our currently hotly contested 35 mainly motoring incidents being heard, NOW, before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, at Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre.

But only, His Honour said, if I chose any eight from the list.

I did and Swansea High Court judge promptly overturned it as too ‘document heavy’ for a jury to ‘comprehend’ so I suggested one jury for each incident!

[My gut feeling told me, now proved, as in my Royal College of Veterinary College ‘HM Partnership’ controlled trial and Lynette White murder trial scandal, also fiddled in Swansea and also refused to be heard out of Wales, no local judge was ever going to give me a jury unless the Welsh appointed judge could ‘get away’ with using case law, eg ‘Hill’, the murdered girl by ‘Sutcliffe’ ‘Jack the Ripper’ allowing police, effectively, ‘no duty of care’.

What I considered, for compromise, was say, four or five incidents for a jury, at a time.

But my old inherited gift of ‘premonitions’, from Mum or Dad, told me to forget it, that has kept me alive, so far, on ‘terra firma’, in ‘terra aqua’ and even after 14 ‘donkey stops’, having ‘broken the bonds of Earth’ only to suddenly finding myself running out of height , airspeed and ideas, all at the same time!

March 2001.

While I was about to set off from Biggin Hill, with 51 other aircraft, senior South Wales police officers were scheeming to have my name removed from the veterinary register all planned for shortly after my return from Australia.

10 11 25 Forensic Analysis MJK[1].pdf

It was obvious that if I could not get these cases out of Wales, early on or get a jury, then I was now doomed as it was now far too late, fiddled and pre planned by the Taffia, Cardiff’s Cabal, 20 years on, as still further obscene costs would have been inflicted.

As it has turned out, for the whole World now to witness, only due to cyberspace, by no other media, four times they have further delayed these Actions, against their ‘extreme and unusual malicious behaviour, first successfully appealing against a jury, then the ‘machine gun’ conspiracy, then the ‘Dr Williams’ et al playing the ‘Gulag Card’ and MAPPA card, the subsequent ‘fabricated ‘harassment of someone who is a criminal ‘on the run’ to this 14^th March fiasco, as fiasco it will surely be, the Criminal Court of Appeal hearing of my stitched up ‘Breach of a Restraining Order’ when no order was ever served!

The most unusual case continues

87 Year Old WW2 Hero Norman Scarth is in Royal Courts Tomorrow Re One Right to Tape Record

Maurice Kirk — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:12:00 GMT

Norman needs YOUR support in Royal Courts of Justice

see previous blogs

to me

http://www.youtube.com/user/kirkflyingvet

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Law-Lords_2C00_-it-appears_2C00_-_2700_Cannot-Stand-Corn_2700_.aspx

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Reporting-In.aspx

Attorney General v Scarth, CO3898/2012

To the Skeleton Argument Office.

Last minute, Urgent! Please ensure this reaches the
Lord Chief Justice before the end of the hearing. (also
sent as an attachment, for easy printing)

For all that I have written these last months, the
situation can be summed up in 63 words.

‘The Law’ in Britain (The Police & the Courts), deliberately
deny me the protection of the law, & deliberately block
me from seeking a remedy in the courts for crimes &
other wrongs committed against me.

That being so, & it IS fact, then that same ‘Law’
CANNOT be used to punish me.

Indeed, both Police & Courts have themselves
committed serious crimes against me, & do so with
impunity.

Norman Scarth.

The content of a series of 1st December 2011 Cardiff Magistrates tape recordings, [examples in previous blogs], mirror the omissions in the later 4^th May 12 transcripts, for ‘Breach of Restraining Order', deliberately doctored by HMCTS and Cardiff's Cabal to repeat the CPS David Gareth Evans lying to the court.

Lawyers and police, when in court, are both immune to prosecution by the ‘Memorandum of Understanding' between police chiefs, Law Society and Bar Council.

The Criminal Court of Appeal have been given statements from the 4^th May 12 jury trial public gallery, for ‘Breach of Restraining Order', that the CPS barrister told the court there was a ‘draft' restraining order , witnessed from the public gallery, being hand written on the 1^st Dec 11 by District Judge Charles and sent to show me to agree or not. NOT give to me as a final order.

Months later, in the jury trial, the witness BECAUSE it was that that was shown to me in the cells at lunch time and not public gallery then heard the prosecution barrister admit he may need to be a defence witness

The FINAL Order was never served on me..

The guard, Lee Barker, whose evidence it was that he came into my cell and left me with the FINAL court copy is nonsense. My cell was opened for release was 5.15pm any hours after Barker was on duty!

ALL CCTV in cells, court logs and custody logs have been withheld because 5 burly guards threw me out of the cell when I was demanding paperwork of the court case outcome, conducted in my absence

NORMAN SCARTH and I are campaigning to be allowed to take tapes of court proceedings.......supervised.

Why are we always refused? In order to cover up the wide spread corruption in our courts and complete disregard for human rights

......My appeal , shortly to be heard in the RCJ, is classic.

The transcript of Cardiff Crown Court proceedings omits the fact my witness names were asked by me in the cells.

Yet another case I did not attend in protest as, again, I was refused witnesses , my legal papers in court or cross examine the same complainant the Caswell Clinic's police psychiatrist who had fabricated seriously worrying medical records.

WHY? In order to have me sectioned to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric prison.

IF my tapes of the original 1^st Dec 11 District Judge John Charles Cardiff magistrates are allowed to be heard at my RCJ appeal, shortly, I will win and a number of prosecution witnesses and the prosecutor stand a very serious risk of themselves going to jail

NORMAN STatement

COURT APPOINTED

To Mr Sashy Nathan, solicitor & Mr Amos Waldman, barrister.

Gentlemen,
I have today, Monday, received by post the Attorney General's bundle of 141 pages, 15 dividers & one CD.
He & his gang may have nothing better to do than produce all this garbage (& receive vast amounts of taxpayers' money for doing so) BUT, having seen some of it before, & noticed the many lies, I am CERTAINLY not going to waste my time reading it again!
To recap & sum up:
This is my Final 'FINAL STATEMENT'.
Accused of 'Contempt of Court', how on earth can I 'defend' myself, when I have made it abundantly clear that I have the utmost contempt for those who currently run our courts.
What I seek to show is that my contempt (& that of a growing number of people) is justified.
The Attorney General seems to think that my contempt will be lessened by his savagery in trying to put me (completely sane) in a Stalinist 'Mental Hospital' for what few years are left to me to live. Could anything be more sadistic? (I send again as an attachment the Andy McCardle document.)
I am rather disappointed to learn that Mr Waldman 'handed up' my Statement at the previous hearing, when I had specifically asked that it be read out, & I again ask that he reads out my Statement of Facts, with addendums etc.
This is important, bearing in mind that one of my arguments is that the Official Transcripts cannot be trusted. I am being more than fair in giving an opportunity for the courts to show that, on this occasion at least, they CAN be accurate.
I ask you please to hammer away at the totally irrelevant lies in the Skeleton Argument & Affidavits (put in purely to blacken my character), & the malice of the Attorney General Dominic Grieve, he being the man who had me thrown out of an Election Selection Committee Meeting in 2008, before he come to power.
As regards this hearing, I am in the fortunate position that I cannot lose. If the case goes against me, it will be more proof of the truth of my words. If (as I belief he will) the Lord Chief Justice rules against the Attorney General, then that will indeed lessen my contempt for his profession.
In which case I ask you to remind him of my request that he should use 'The Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court' to order an investigation into the 17 years of persecution, this action by the AG being only the latest. Also that he use that same 'Inherent Jurisdiction' to reduce the obstruction to my own attempts to use the law to seek a remedy for serious wrongs committed against me.
An example(a comparatively minor one) has just arrived by post today, Monday. On 17th September 2012 I made a 'Small Claim' against the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire. Twice, the documents were returned to me for some fictitious fault. Sent in again with the 'fault' rectified, I heard not a word until today, when the letter arrived. With it was a Notice of Issue, saying that the Claim had been sent to the Defendant on 15th January 2013.
SO, IT HAS TAKEN FOUR MONTHS TO HAVE A VERY SIMPLE 'SMALL CLAIM' ISSUED!.
Was this just incompetence, inefficiency or laziness? Or deliberate delay against the hated Litigant In Person? I am tempted to think the latter.
I ask you to hammer away at all that which is above at the hearing.
You know you can do it!!
Norman Scarth

Prosecution Refuse to Supply Depositions to Litigant in Person or Mackenzie Friend & RSA Informed

Maurice Kirk — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:23:00 GMT

Tuesday 15th January House of Commons Meeting

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDZB97tth1k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4T-fydVc8qc

http://victims-unite.net/2013/01/08/mind-the-gaps-between-online-and-mainstream-media-government-and-public-the-house-of-commons/

Bristol Community Radio Friday 11th January 2013

'Victims Unite' Interview with Sabine McNeill

Litigant in Person

The thorn in the eye of the legal professionals, Litigants in Person run the risk of being labelled “vexatious litigant”. But also THE opportunity for strengthening one’s character and one’s ability to help others and get help from others, eventually to make a difference to a system of financial exploitation and legal oppression. Here are [...]

click download

http://bcfm.org.uk/category/shows/dialect-radio

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JVFh-AoHiU

Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal Court of Appeal, ref: 201203241 D Administrative Court ref: CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012 Royal Courts of Justice Court

London

12^th January 2013

Dear Ms Bracken,

Prosecution Refuse to Supply Depositions to Litigant in Person

Police evidence, for the 2^nd May 12 ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ jury trial and this subsequent appeal, was sent to Cardiff prison by the CPS but I was not allowed them in court unlike any other prisoner, on my prison wing, on legal aid.

I repeatedly requested for a duplicate copy for a solicitor or Mackenzie Friend outside the prison in order to help an incarcerated Litigant in Person prepare his defence.

During my 2009 farcical ‘machine gun’ trial and acquittal, again being unable to give evidence, I was given duplicate copy of deposition papers and even legal aid, without examination of my financial status, anything to stop my cross examining the police officers in the MAPPA, Chief Constable and NHS conspiracy. It was blackmail to use a Luigi Stranati, HMCTS Delivery Director’s hand picked Welsh nobbled barrister.

A fat lot of good, no need, as His Honour Paul Thomas QC simply refused me either deposition copies in the court room until the closing stages of a two week trial.

During 4^th May 12 ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ trial I was again refused, in court, any legal papers at all [See references on transcript, court log, prison and GEOamey Custody Services records and prison and court cctv except an extortionate obviously redacted and inaccurate Luigi controlled HM transcript, bought on borrowed money].

Both at original 1^st Dec 11 magistrates ‘harassment’ conviction and at its 1^st March 2012 Crown Court Appeal, Luigi, again refused my legal papers in court, eye witnesses or those to confirm I was, any way, immune to prosecution by sub section 3 a) & c) of 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act.

In July 2012 I was again jailed for alleged ‘Breach of Restraining Order’, again only reliant on the false information from the original ‘on the sick’ police psychiatrist.

The CPS continue to refuse to provide copies of those depositions for this appeal that must have been in existence by my September12 release, with all charges dropped.

Yours truly, Maurice J Kirk BVSc Copies to CPS, Cardiff & GMC, London, very shortly to receive my visits.

Luigi Strinati's title is a Delivery Director (for the whole of Wales)

He is one of only seven delivery directors across the UK. Thats how powerful he is.

Ha? What is this?

Caswell Clinic doctors in Cardiff court next week?

13 01 07 Magiistrates reply re Dr witness summons appl REDACTED.pdf

12 02 04 Assoc Mackenzie Friends to HM Gov Cardiff Prison.pdf

Solicitor's Regulatory Authority letter re Morgan Cole, NHS(Wales)Cardiff solicitors

13 01 10l SRA re Morgan Cole_0001.pdf

Notes from the public gallery of the extent the doctor was CPS barrister Evans 'examined' and little shyster, Swansea solictor, appointed by court against my wishes, 'cross examined!

Neither asked any relevant questions needed to 'put to proof' or 'challenge'

The tape recording of the case is available for any one as to publish may place me 'in some difficulties'.

Dr Magistrates Evidence.pdf

Your Police Budget.pdf

Please Sign The Petition

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/abolish-the-ban-on-recording-court-proceedings.html

To Mr Sashy Nathan, Solicitor, Bindmans, & to Mr. Amos Waldman, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers.

Re the Application by the Attorney-General's team for my 'COMMITTAL', to be heard before the Lord Chief Justice, the Right Honourable Lord Judge, in the Royal Court of Justice on the morning of 23rd January 2013. I have been looking again at The Treasury Solicitor's letter dated 21 December 2012 (received by email from you on 2nd January 2013). & note it invites written questions for the 'witnesses'. I believe this could be better than questioning verbally.

My questions to ALL witnesses - and everyone else involved in this persecution - JUDGES, LAWYERS, POLICE, COURT STAFF, 'SECURITY' STAFF, BAILIFFS & ALL, are:

QUESTION 1:

Did you read the story that Prime Minister David Cameron had announced that an Arctic Convoy Star medal will be awarded "to those who braved the deadly missions." "I am very pleased that some of the brave men of the Arctic Convoys will get the recognition they so richly deserve for the very dangerous work they did," the British prime minister told MPs."? It is notable he says 'some of the brave men'. In fact, more than 3,000 died on the convoys: Of those who survived, only a couple of hundred or so are still alive to receive the medal.

QUESTION 2:

Are you proud to be playing your part in sending one of those men, a man who fought to give you the 'Freedom' which YOU now enjoy, a man who has worked honestly & hard all his life, A MAN WHO IS COMPLETELY SANE, to die in a Stalinist 'Mental Hospital' - for the 'crime' of exposing the rotten apples in the judiciary?

QUESTION 3:

Or would you claim there are no rotten apples in the judiciary? QUESTION 4: Did you ever wear a poppy, & if so, what did it mean to you? Norman Scarth.

Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal ref: 201203241 D Royal Courts of Justice Court ref: CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012 1CF 03546 9^th January 2013

Royal Courts of Justice Court

Dear Case Worker,

Regina v Kirk Breach of Restraining Order Appeal

Supervised Personal Recording of Cardiff Courts’ Evidence

The Cardiff Crown Court continue to refuse to reply to my applications to both hear and purchase digital CD record of my 4^th May 12 jury trial when I was refused my legal papers in court, witnesses to give relevant evidence and carried on despite my need for medical attention following my attempts to extract some of the CPS deposition paperwork from my rectum.

In the past I have been allowed to hear court tapes but now I am blocked despite clear evidence of erroneous record on delayed and expensive transcripts omitting critical words as ‘inaudible’.

Yesterday I visited an almost fruitless Cardiff Crown Court encounter, following your advice following their refusal to deal with the matter over the telephone.

HMCTS Amanda …… flatly refused my hearing or obtain true copy of evidence subject to appeal in the Royal Courts of Justice .

I even summoned police from the street to witness and record in note book as no one, around here, seems to believe a word I say of what actually is going on in Wales as they barter for judicial autonomy.

I APPLY to the Criminal Court of Appeal to allow me the right to hear and keep, at my expense, what /I heard on official digitally recorded CDs under the control of Luigi Stranati, HMCTS Wales manager.

I managed, by using the police presence, to make the court manager hand over copies of letters instigated by Luigi Stranati ….fairy tales relied on in blocking my access to any of the court buildings in order to frustrate appeals and civil actions for ‘s damages.

Website Blog summary of yesterday’s Cardiff Crown Court experience: .I have repeatedly been refused the right to hear my Crown Court hearings or buy the digital recorded CDs. Interesting that in England friends have not been so hindered by their courts, under the same jurisdiction.So I asked the police to attend Cardiff Crown Court this afternoon and PC 4215 witnessed it all,,,,,,eventually, an hour later, after the usual inherent deceit from one or two, I left ,faxed from County Court, Luigi Stranati's 2010 letter and Neil Pring's letter both refusing me access to any Cardiff courts unless I have a case.....as for listening to or getting CDs I was again flatly refused by Amanda MaCafrey, manager.

The Criminal Court of Appeal are therefore also being denied the proof that despite my asking my defence witnesses be named to HHJ Curren QC, in 4th May jury trial, re breach of Restraining Order, we are both refused proof that what is on the 'official transcript' is NOT what was accurately recorded by someone in the public gallery.no wonder the Norman Scarths and Patrick Cullinanes are also so frustrated to be convicted for taping their own cases strictly for their own use and serve prison sentances....interestingly Norman Scarth’s appeal in London is on 23rd January...PLEASE BE THERE

JUST IN FROM A MACKENZIE FRIEND I think the answer to the issue of refusal to supply the digital copies must be article 10 ECHR in that it is denying legitimate freedom of expression and also receipt of ideas etc.There is nothing in law to say that you shouldn't have copies, so any decision to deny you copies won't be prescribed by law. Also article 6(1) ECHR is involved, as you want the transcripts in connection with your appeal and JR. I think that the only remedy would be a Human Rights Act challenge by JR. However, it would be desirable if you obtained a written decision as to why you are being denied the transcripts.Have you received anything in writing explaining why you are being refused permission to obtain the copies?

Yours truly,

Maurice J Kirk BVsc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtOlrWAbbQU

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manager,

Cardiff Crown Court,Wales UK ref: 201203241 D & CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012 & 1CF 03546

11^th January 2013

Dear Amanda Mackafry,

Litigant in Person Refused CDs or Hearing Trial’s Digital Record .The Criminal Court of Appeal have suggested I ask yet again to hear the digital record of just what was said in 4^th May 2012 Crown Court following my messages from the cells, for witnesses, being stifled.

I wish the previous applications, over the past 20 years, also to be reconsidered for the civil damages claim hearing commencing 18^th February 2013.

If I were a lawyer or on legal aid I am assured the recording is freely available and a doctor has just confirmed she was supplied with court CDs of a hearing in England so why so different in Wales?

It stinks, doesn’t it?

No wonder more and more, not on legal aid, tape record hearings for them selves.

In order to get that to which I am entitled do I really have to disclose publicly my mother was a Jenkins and grand mother was a Morgan, being a direct line from a notorious locally born pirate?

Yours patiently,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copy to Criminal Court of Appeal

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Cardiff Cabal Poster.doc

In Cardiff County Court Case No. BS614159

30^th January 2013

Before: His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

B E T W E E N

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Claimant

-v-

THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES POLICE

Defendant

Application to call witnesses

I, Maurice Kirk, make application to call further witnesses, contained in the enclosed witness list, that have become relevant, since 1992, when these damages proceedings were first commenced. Between now and during the trial, commencing 18^th February 2013, more prosecution witnesses will be identified and traced requiring, from time to time, still further applications for disclosure of evidence from parties to include both serving and retired police officers, HM court staff, HM prison staff, Probation staff, participants of MAPPA, FTAC and Special Branch, New Scotland Yard employees, Civil Aviation Authority officers and NHS(Wales) personnel.

Prosecution Witnesses for Trial

include:

1. Barbara Wilding ex Chief Constable c/o South Wales Police HQ, Bridgend

2. David Vaughan, Chief Constable c/o South Wales Police HQ, Bridgend

3. Luigi Stranati HMCTS Delivery Director c/o Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

4. Neil Pring HMCTS Manager c/o Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

5. Inspector J Dave MAPPA

6. AJ Richards ACO MAPPA

7. Assistant Chief Officer Granville Brunt MAPPA

8. Nine of ‘machine gun’ 25^th January 2010 jury trial

9. Jerry Cooper machine gun buyer

10. Original machine gun seller

11. Detective Inspector Hughes c/o Cardiff Bay Police Station

12. Chief Superintendent Tim Jones, Professional Standards Dept,

13. Christopher Paul Alexander, (Ebbs) Hintern Airfield, Banbury

14. Inspector Grothier Professional Standards Dept, South Wales Police HQ

15. Dr Phillips, FTAC, London

16. Dr S Coleman Cowbridge Health Centre, Cowbridge Vale of Glamorgan

17. Dr Andrew Metters c/o Princess Of Wales hospital Bridgend

18. Dr Gaynor Jones c/o Caswell Clinic, Bridgend

19. Dr Seely HMP Cardiff c/o HM Cardiff Prison

20. Dr of MAPPA c/o NHS (Wales) HQ, Port Talbot

21. Dr Aisling Butler of Princess of Wales Hospital Bridgend

22. Dr Tudor Princess of Wales Hospital

23. Ian Mulholland Deputy Director Custody HMP

24. HMP Governer Richard Booty, Cardiff

25. HMP Governor Heidi Murray, Cardiff

26. Dr John Azami, Anaesthetist, Vale Hospital, Vale of Glamorgan

27. Professor Rodger Wood c/o Swansea University

28. Jim Mackenna CAA Investigator, CAA House Kingsway

29. DC Evans c/o South Wales Police HQ

30. DC Jones c/o South Wales Police HQ

31. David Gareth Evans c/o 9 Park Crescent Chambers, Cardiff

32. Ms Caress, Barry Magistrates

33. Mr M Williams Cardiff Magistrates

34. Inspector Trigg Rtd c/o Barry Police Station

35. Sgt PS Warner c/o Barry Police Station

36. PC Nigel Brown c/o Cardiff Central Police Station

37. Crown Prosecutor Ms Jackie Seals, Capital Tower, Cardiff

38. Sgt Runnels c/o Llantwit Major Police Station

39. Sgt Phil Davies Rtd c/o Bridgend Police Station

40. Maurice John Kirk

41. Diane Graham, Brittany

42. Scott Parry Highbridge Somerset

43. Jane Walker, Llandow

44. Michael Powell, Cardiff

45. Jennifer Hanson Tynewydd Road

46. Mr Thomas Tynewydd Road

47. Linda Holland, Barry

48. John Francis Clode, Barry

49. Gerald Thomas, Thompson Street

50. Mr Murphy The Old Police Station Barry

51. Ieuan Rees, Barrister, Angel Chambers, Swansea

52. Antony Glen Gafael Cardiff

53. Kirstie Kirk, Llantwit Major

54. Angus Turnbull St Athan

55. Jonathan Clayton ATC Cardiff

56. Andrew Aishe, Taunton

57. Crown Prosecutor Robert Mundy New Scotland Yard

58. Sue Jenkins Dinas Powis

59. Dr Bruce Fergusson NHS(wALES)

60. Dr Push Mangat NHS(WALES)

This list is not exhaustive

The Gravy Train

Back in 1992 I was originally granted a jury trial by my then English solicitorand in around 2003 His Honour Judge Chambers QC granted one!

But the 'powers that that be', the Cardiff Cabal that run all the courts, had other ideas.....the Welsh papers being at reious risk of breaking rank with the obvious outcome. Cyberspace, remember,was still in its infancy.

No, I as given a jury purely to waste nearly three years of of my time and money with it being over turned in the Welsh High Court in a matter of nana seconds. Another court settled in a bottomless pit of tax payers' money and a cosy relationship between the 'all powerful' Welsh judges and a pack of unscrupulous lawyers, yapping at their heals soaking up the cash.

They have managed to draw this one out, so far, for twenty years. Der.oes it matter? The more they delay the more cash they get either from me or from the tax payer. [The usual arrangement is to steal from both as their is no effective taxation of lawyer bills in the UK and never forget the 'Memorandum of Understanding' between lawyer and theie local men in blue.

Cardiff civil justice centre pg1.pdf

Cardiff civil justice centre pg2.pdf

Cardiff civil justice centre pg3.pdf

Cardiff civil justice centre pg4.pdf

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICECase No.doc

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

My Witness if the cabal dare

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Wanted-for-Attempted-Murder.aspx

LIST OF POLICE DEFENCE WITNESSES

SWP Witnesses Kirk v SWP.doc

schedu;le motoring.pdf

On the 23rd Norman Scarth RN Rtd will challenge the current law with one hand , if not both hands, well behind his back.

My trial, similarly, will be another Cardiff traversty of justice its outcome settled years ago....only dragged out to steal cash, mine or yours.

Compimentary to any Whitehall Farce of Brian Ricks the stench from clumsilly hidden evidence from within police records will not be stiffled and is further arguement to allow supervised recording, for litigants in person (LiP) of magistrates and other proceedings HM runnning the extortionate game of selling you a so called accurate transcript at nearly £10 a page!!!!

I used to listen to court tapes but the evil bastards who run Cardiff Courts now refuse my listenng to or buying CDs as is allowed in the English High Court.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Law-Lords_2C00_-it-appears_2C00_-_2700_Cannot-Stand-Corn_2700_.aspx

EBERT another case I have studied in detail......clearly swindled by corrupt judge...(it took three hours, under tuition to go through the papers)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWUizz3bOmU

Princess Diana and Royal Courts of Justice

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xiuj53_unlawful-killing-directed-by-keith-allen_news

http://www.onetruemedia.com/otm_site/view_shared?p=116ea8568481d69d52553f4&skin_id=1702&large

this blog is in its infancy