Legal Battles : McKenzie Friends, Freemansonry

3rd Week of South Wales Police B ullying Trial with Avon and Somerserset Police on First

Maurice Kirk — Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:08:00 GMT

Maurice Refused a Jury

Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police                                                                                               BS 614159

11^th Day

Monday 4^th March13

Claimant Position Statement

Applications for Consideration

1.       Defendant ordered, to be produced today , the 27 written complaints, as a written list, currently in possession of Defendant and referred to by former Inspector Sydney Griffiths during his cross examination.

2.       Result from those written complaints, identified on the list, to be disclosed.

3.       Claimant awaits the findings of his other complaints, mainly of non disclosure, not being identified by the Claimant, such as court cases with Claimant being the successful victim and police instigated ‘break ins’ to his various veterinary surgeries and places of residence.

4.       Incidents, referred to in paragraph 3., are absent from Barbara Wilding’s 25^th February 2009 sworn affidavit, prepared by Dolmans and signed six weeks late by her, then as Chief Constable, despite the specific court orders by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC.

5.       Identification required of which Defendant witness relates to which of Claimant’s 52 leaver arch files given to Defendant,, to copy and so expedite proceedings, as there is now total confusion deliberately caused by Dolmans, solicitors, by having masked out the Claimant’s indices on each spine on every file!

6.       52 files were originally prepared and marked by Claimant’s secretary before they were disclosed as Claimant exhibits for South Wales Police to copy and to ‘settle out of court’.

7.       Claimant is seeking a ‘Medical afternoon’ before or after 3pm’, at the court’s convenience, this week, in order to find a GP, with which to register, well out of South Wales.

8.       The Claimant cannot proceed with cross examination until Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) and the Defendant produce both male psychiatrist’s falsely written and his Dr wife’s section 9 statements created, to adversely affect the Claimant, since 2009, in this trial.

9.       Following orders from Barbara Wilding , to cause the forensic psychiatrist(s) to attend Barry police station, at very short notice , to attend and contribute in the 8^th June MAPPA level 3 meeting, not to inform their victim, the Claimant was so registered and should the Claimant approach the Defendant again, to attempt ‘witness statements exchange’ he was ‘likely to be shot’ ‘.[quote from MAPPA contemporaneous notes taken at the time]

10.   The doctor’s 2012 victim MG 11witness statements are partly dictated and counter signed.

11.   That , alone, has caused the Claimant to be detained in numerous police stations, law courts and HM prisons due to one doctors and NHS (Wales) facing my million pound damages claim citing Barbara Wilding and her agents in the conspiracy.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

I was originally awarded a jury trial by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, nearly 10 years ago, against the bullying South Wales Police over our currently hotly contested 35 mainly motoring incidents being heard, NOW, before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, at Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre.

But only, His Honour said, if I chose any eight from the list.

I did and Swansea High Court judge promptly overturned it as too ‘document heavy’ for a jury to ‘comprehend’ so I suggested one jury for each incident!

[My gut feeling told me, now proved, as in my Royal College of Veterinary College ‘HM Partnership’ controlled trial and Lynette White murder trial scandal, also fiddled in Swansea and also refused to be heard out of Wales, no local judge was ever going to give me a jury unless the Welsh appointed judge could ‘get away’ with using case law, eg ‘Hill’, the murdered girl by ‘Sutcliffe’ ‘Jack the Ripper’ allowing police, effectively, ‘no duty of care’.

What I considered, for compromise, was say, four or five incidents for a jury, at a time.

But my old inherited gift of ‘premonitions’, from Mum or Dad, told me to forget it, that has kept me alive, so far, on ‘terra firma’, in ‘terra aqua’ and even after 14 ‘donkey stops’, having ‘broken the bonds of Earth’ only to suddenly finding myself running out of height , airspeed and ideas, all at the same time!

March 2001.

While I was about to set off from Biggin Hill, with 51 other aircraft, senior South Wales police officers were scheeming to have my name removed from the veterinary register all planned for shortly after my return from Australia.

10 11 25 Forensic Analysis MJK[1].pdf

It was obvious that if I could not get these cases out of Wales, early on or get a jury, then I was now doomed as it was now far too late, fiddled and pre planned by the Taffia, Cardiff’s Cabal, 20 years on, as still further obscene costs would have been inflicted.

As it has turned out, for the whole World now to witness, only due to cyberspace, by no other media, four times they have further delayed these Actions, against their ‘extreme and unusual malicious behaviour, first successfully appealing against a jury, then the ‘machine gun’ conspiracy, then the ‘Dr Williams’ et al playing the ‘Gulag Card’ and MAPPA card, the subsequent ‘fabricated ‘harassment of someone who is a criminal ‘on the run’ to this 14^th March fiasco, as fiasco it will surely be, the Criminal Court of Appeal hearing of my stitched up ‘Breach of a Restraining Order’ when no order was ever served!

The most unusual case continues

Prosecution Refuse to Supply Depositions to Litigant in Person or Mackenzie Friend & RSA Informed

Maurice Kirk — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:23:00 GMT

Tuesday 15th January House of Commons Meeting

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDZB97tth1k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4T-fydVc8qc

http://victims-unite.net/2013/01/08/mind-the-gaps-between-online-and-mainstream-media-government-and-public-the-house-of-commons/

Bristol Community Radio Friday 11th January 2013

'Victims Unite' Interview with Sabine McNeill

Litigant in Person

The thorn in the eye of the legal professionals, Litigants in Person run the risk of being labelled “vexatious litigant”. But also THE opportunity for strengthening one’s character and one’s ability to help others and get help from others, eventually to make a difference to a system of financial exploitation and legal oppression. Here are [...]

click download

http://bcfm.org.uk/category/shows/dialect-radio

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JVFh-AoHiU

Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal Court of Appeal, ref: 201203241 D Administrative Court ref: CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012 Royal Courts of Justice Court

London

12^th January 2013

Dear Ms Bracken,

Prosecution Refuse to Supply Depositions to Litigant in Person

Police evidence, for the 2^nd May 12 ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ jury trial and this subsequent appeal, was sent to Cardiff prison by the CPS but I was not allowed them in court unlike any other prisoner, on my prison wing, on legal aid.

I repeatedly requested for a duplicate copy for a solicitor or Mackenzie Friend outside the prison in order to help an incarcerated Litigant in Person prepare his defence.

During my 2009 farcical ‘machine gun’ trial and acquittal, again being unable to give evidence, I was given duplicate copy of deposition papers and even legal aid, without examination of my financial status, anything to stop my cross examining the police officers in the MAPPA, Chief Constable and NHS conspiracy. It was blackmail to use a Luigi Stranati, HMCTS Delivery Director’s hand picked Welsh nobbled barrister.

A fat lot of good, no need, as His Honour Paul Thomas QC simply refused me either deposition copies in the court room until the closing stages of a two week trial.

During 4^th May 12 ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ trial I was again refused, in court, any legal papers at all [See references on transcript, court log, prison and GEOamey Custody Services records and prison and court cctv except an extortionate obviously redacted and inaccurate Luigi controlled HM transcript, bought on borrowed money].

Both at original 1^st Dec 11 magistrates ‘harassment’ conviction and at its 1^st March 2012 Crown Court Appeal, Luigi, again refused my legal papers in court, eye witnesses or those to confirm I was, any way, immune to prosecution by sub section 3 a) & c) of 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act.

In July 2012 I was again jailed for alleged ‘Breach of Restraining Order’, again only reliant on the false information from the original ‘on the sick’ police psychiatrist.

The CPS continue to refuse to provide copies of those depositions for this appeal that must have been in existence by my September12 release, with all charges dropped.

Yours truly, Maurice J Kirk BVSc Copies to CPS, Cardiff & GMC, London, very shortly to receive my visits.

Luigi Strinati's title is a Delivery Director (for the whole of Wales)

He is one of only seven delivery directors across the UK. Thats how powerful he is.

Ha? What is this?

Caswell Clinic doctors in Cardiff court next week?

13 01 07 Magiistrates reply re Dr witness summons appl REDACTED.pdf

12 02 04 Assoc Mackenzie Friends to HM Gov Cardiff Prison.pdf

Solicitor's Regulatory Authority letter re Morgan Cole, NHS(Wales)Cardiff solicitors

13 01 10l SRA re Morgan Cole_0001.pdf

Notes from the public gallery of the extent the doctor was CPS barrister Evans 'examined' and little shyster, Swansea solictor, appointed by court against my wishes, 'cross examined!

Neither asked any relevant questions needed to 'put to proof' or 'challenge'

The tape recording of the case is available for any one as to publish may place me 'in some difficulties'.

Dr Magistrates Evidence.pdf

Your Police Budget.pdf

Please Sign The Petition

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/abolish-the-ban-on-recording-court-proceedings.html

To Mr Sashy Nathan, Solicitor, Bindmans, & to Mr. Amos Waldman, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers.

Re the Application by the Attorney-General's team for my 'COMMITTAL', to be heard before the Lord Chief Justice, the Right Honourable Lord Judge, in the Royal Court of Justice on the morning of 23rd January 2013. I have been looking again at The Treasury Solicitor's letter dated 21 December 2012 (received by email from you on 2nd January 2013). & note it invites written questions for the 'witnesses'. I believe this could be better than questioning verbally.

My questions to ALL witnesses - and everyone else involved in this persecution - JUDGES, LAWYERS, POLICE, COURT STAFF, 'SECURITY' STAFF, BAILIFFS & ALL, are:

QUESTION 1:

Did you read the story that Prime Minister David Cameron had announced that an Arctic Convoy Star medal will be awarded "to those who braved the deadly missions." "I am very pleased that some of the brave men of the Arctic Convoys will get the recognition they so richly deserve for the very dangerous work they did," the British prime minister told MPs."? It is notable he says 'some of the brave men'. In fact, more than 3,000 died on the convoys: Of those who survived, only a couple of hundred or so are still alive to receive the medal.

QUESTION 2:

Are you proud to be playing your part in sending one of those men, a man who fought to give you the 'Freedom' which YOU now enjoy, a man who has worked honestly & hard all his life, A MAN WHO IS COMPLETELY SANE, to die in a Stalinist 'Mental Hospital' - for the 'crime' of exposing the rotten apples in the judiciary?

QUESTION 3:

Or would you claim there are no rotten apples in the judiciary? QUESTION 4: Did you ever wear a poppy, & if so, what did it mean to you? Norman Scarth.

Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal ref: 201203241 D Royal Courts of Justice Court ref: CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012 1CF 03546 9^th January 2013

Royal Courts of Justice Court

Dear Case Worker,

Regina v Kirk Breach of Restraining Order Appeal

Supervised Personal Recording of Cardiff Courts’ Evidence

The Cardiff Crown Court continue to refuse to reply to my applications to both hear and purchase digital CD record of my 4^th May 12 jury trial when I was refused my legal papers in court, witnesses to give relevant evidence and carried on despite my need for medical attention following my attempts to extract some of the CPS deposition paperwork from my rectum.

In the past I have been allowed to hear court tapes but now I am blocked despite clear evidence of erroneous record on delayed and expensive transcripts omitting critical words as ‘inaudible’.

Yesterday I visited an almost fruitless Cardiff Crown Court encounter, following your advice following their refusal to deal with the matter over the telephone.

HMCTS Amanda …… flatly refused my hearing or obtain true copy of evidence subject to appeal in the Royal Courts of Justice .

I even summoned police from the street to witness and record in note book as no one, around here, seems to believe a word I say of what actually is going on in Wales as they barter for judicial autonomy.

I APPLY to the Criminal Court of Appeal to allow me the right to hear and keep, at my expense, what /I heard on official digitally recorded CDs under the control of Luigi Stranati, HMCTS Wales manager.

I managed, by using the police presence, to make the court manager hand over copies of letters instigated by Luigi Stranati ….fairy tales relied on in blocking my access to any of the court buildings in order to frustrate appeals and civil actions for ‘s damages.

Website Blog summary of yesterday’s Cardiff Crown Court experience: .I have repeatedly been refused the right to hear my Crown Court hearings or buy the digital recorded CDs. Interesting that in England friends have not been so hindered by their courts, under the same jurisdiction.So I asked the police to attend Cardiff Crown Court this afternoon and PC 4215 witnessed it all,,,,,,eventually, an hour later, after the usual inherent deceit from one or two, I left ,faxed from County Court, Luigi Stranati's 2010 letter and Neil Pring's letter both refusing me access to any Cardiff courts unless I have a case.....as for listening to or getting CDs I was again flatly refused by Amanda MaCafrey, manager.

The Criminal Court of Appeal are therefore also being denied the proof that despite my asking my defence witnesses be named to HHJ Curren QC, in 4th May jury trial, re breach of Restraining Order, we are both refused proof that what is on the 'official transcript' is NOT what was accurately recorded by someone in the public gallery.no wonder the Norman Scarths and Patrick Cullinanes are also so frustrated to be convicted for taping their own cases strictly for their own use and serve prison sentances....interestingly Norman Scarth’s appeal in London is on 23rd January...PLEASE BE THERE

JUST IN FROM A MACKENZIE FRIEND I think the answer to the issue of refusal to supply the digital copies must be article 10 ECHR in that it is denying legitimate freedom of expression and also receipt of ideas etc.There is nothing in law to say that you shouldn't have copies, so any decision to deny you copies won't be prescribed by law. Also article 6(1) ECHR is involved, as you want the transcripts in connection with your appeal and JR. I think that the only remedy would be a Human Rights Act challenge by JR. However, it would be desirable if you obtained a written decision as to why you are being denied the transcripts.Have you received anything in writing explaining why you are being refused permission to obtain the copies?

Yours truly,

Maurice J Kirk BVsc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtOlrWAbbQU

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manager,

Cardiff Crown Court,Wales UK ref: 201203241 D & CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012 & 1CF 03546

11^th January 2013

Dear Amanda Mackafry,

Litigant in Person Refused CDs or Hearing Trial’s Digital Record .The Criminal Court of Appeal have suggested I ask yet again to hear the digital record of just what was said in 4^th May 2012 Crown Court following my messages from the cells, for witnesses, being stifled.

I wish the previous applications, over the past 20 years, also to be reconsidered for the civil damages claim hearing commencing 18^th February 2013.

If I were a lawyer or on legal aid I am assured the recording is freely available and a doctor has just confirmed she was supplied with court CDs of a hearing in England so why so different in Wales?

It stinks, doesn’t it?

No wonder more and more, not on legal aid, tape record hearings for them selves.

In order to get that to which I am entitled do I really have to disclose publicly my mother was a Jenkins and grand mother was a Morgan, being a direct line from a notorious locally born pirate?

Yours patiently,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copy to Criminal Court of Appeal

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Cardiff Cabal Poster.doc

In Cardiff County Court Case No. BS614159

30^th January 2013

Before: His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

B E T W E E N

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Claimant

-v-

THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES POLICE

Defendant

Application to call witnesses

I, Maurice Kirk, make application to call further witnesses, contained in the enclosed witness list, that have become relevant, since 1992, when these damages proceedings were first commenced. Between now and during the trial, commencing 18^th February 2013, more prosecution witnesses will be identified and traced requiring, from time to time, still further applications for disclosure of evidence from parties to include both serving and retired police officers, HM court staff, HM prison staff, Probation staff, participants of MAPPA, FTAC and Special Branch, New Scotland Yard employees, Civil Aviation Authority officers and NHS(Wales) personnel.

Prosecution Witnesses for Trial

include:

1. Barbara Wilding ex Chief Constable c/o South Wales Police HQ, Bridgend

2. David Vaughan, Chief Constable c/o South Wales Police HQ, Bridgend

3. Luigi Stranati HMCTS Delivery Director c/o Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

4. Neil Pring HMCTS Manager c/o Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

5. Inspector J Dave MAPPA

6. AJ Richards ACO MAPPA

7. Assistant Chief Officer Granville Brunt MAPPA

8. Nine of ‘machine gun’ 25^th January 2010 jury trial

9. Jerry Cooper machine gun buyer

10. Original machine gun seller

11. Detective Inspector Hughes c/o Cardiff Bay Police Station

12. Chief Superintendent Tim Jones, Professional Standards Dept,

13. Christopher Paul Alexander, (Ebbs) Hintern Airfield, Banbury

14. Inspector Grothier Professional Standards Dept, South Wales Police HQ

15. Dr Phillips, FTAC, London

16. Dr S Coleman Cowbridge Health Centre, Cowbridge Vale of Glamorgan

17. Dr Andrew Metters c/o Princess Of Wales hospital Bridgend

18. Dr Gaynor Jones c/o Caswell Clinic, Bridgend

19. Dr Seely HMP Cardiff c/o HM Cardiff Prison

20. Dr of MAPPA c/o NHS (Wales) HQ, Port Talbot

21. Dr Aisling Butler of Princess of Wales Hospital Bridgend

22. Dr Tudor Princess of Wales Hospital

23. Ian Mulholland Deputy Director Custody HMP

24. HMP Governer Richard Booty, Cardiff

25. HMP Governor Heidi Murray, Cardiff

26. Dr John Azami, Anaesthetist, Vale Hospital, Vale of Glamorgan

27. Professor Rodger Wood c/o Swansea University

28. Jim Mackenna CAA Investigator, CAA House Kingsway

29. DC Evans c/o South Wales Police HQ

30. DC Jones c/o South Wales Police HQ

31. David Gareth Evans c/o 9 Park Crescent Chambers, Cardiff

32. Ms Caress, Barry Magistrates

33. Mr M Williams Cardiff Magistrates

34. Inspector Trigg Rtd c/o Barry Police Station

35. Sgt PS Warner c/o Barry Police Station

36. PC Nigel Brown c/o Cardiff Central Police Station

37. Crown Prosecutor Ms Jackie Seals, Capital Tower, Cardiff

38. Sgt Runnels c/o Llantwit Major Police Station

39. Sgt Phil Davies Rtd c/o Bridgend Police Station

40. Maurice John Kirk

41. Diane Graham, Brittany

42. Scott Parry Highbridge Somerset

43. Jane Walker, Llandow

44. Michael Powell, Cardiff

45. Jennifer Hanson Tynewydd Road

46. Mr Thomas Tynewydd Road

47. Linda Holland, Barry

48. John Francis Clode, Barry

49. Gerald Thomas, Thompson Street

50. Mr Murphy The Old Police Station Barry

51. Ieuan Rees, Barrister, Angel Chambers, Swansea

52. Antony Glen Gafael Cardiff

53. Kirstie Kirk, Llantwit Major

54. Angus Turnbull St Athan

55. Jonathan Clayton ATC Cardiff

56. Andrew Aishe, Taunton

57. Crown Prosecutor Robert Mundy New Scotland Yard

58. Sue Jenkins Dinas Powis

59. Dr Bruce Fergusson NHS(wALES)

60. Dr Push Mangat NHS(WALES)

This list is not exhaustive

The Gravy Train

Back in 1992 I was originally granted a jury trial by my then English solicitorand in around 2003 His Honour Judge Chambers QC granted one!

But the 'powers that that be', the Cardiff Cabal that run all the courts, had other ideas.....the Welsh papers being at reious risk of breaking rank with the obvious outcome. Cyberspace, remember,was still in its infancy.

No, I as given a jury purely to waste nearly three years of of my time and money with it being over turned in the Welsh High Court in a matter of nana seconds. Another court settled in a bottomless pit of tax payers' money and a cosy relationship between the 'all powerful' Welsh judges and a pack of unscrupulous lawyers, yapping at their heals soaking up the cash.

They have managed to draw this one out, so far, for twenty years. Der.oes it matter? The more they delay the more cash they get either from me or from the tax payer. [The usual arrangement is to steal from both as their is no effective taxation of lawyer bills in the UK and never forget the 'Memorandum of Understanding' between lawyer and theie local men in blue.

Cardiff civil justice centre pg1.pdf

Cardiff civil justice centre pg2.pdf

Cardiff civil justice centre pg3.pdf

Cardiff civil justice centre pg4.pdf

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICECase No.doc

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

My Witness if the cabal dare

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Wanted-for-Attempted-Murder.aspx

LIST OF POLICE DEFENCE WITNESSES

SWP Witnesses Kirk v SWP.doc

schedu;le motoring.pdf

On the 23rd Norman Scarth RN Rtd will challenge the current law with one hand , if not both hands, well behind his back.

My trial, similarly, will be another Cardiff traversty of justice its outcome settled years ago....only dragged out to steal cash, mine or yours.

Compimentary to any Whitehall Farce of Brian Ricks the stench from clumsilly hidden evidence from within police records will not be stiffled and is further arguement to allow supervised recording, for litigants in person (LiP) of magistrates and other proceedings HM runnning the extortionate game of selling you a so called accurate transcript at nearly £10 a page!!!!

I used to listen to court tapes but the evil bastards who run Cardiff Courts now refuse my listenng to or buying CDs as is allowed in the English High Court.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Law-Lords_2C00_-it-appears_2C00_-_2700_Cannot-Stand-Corn_2700_.aspx

EBERT another case I have studied in detail......clearly swindled by corrupt judge...(it took three hours, under tuition to go through the papers)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWUizz3bOmU

Princess Diana and Royal Courts of Justice

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xiuj53_unlawful-killing-directed-by-keith-allen_news

http://www.onetruemedia.com/otm_site/view_shared?p=116ea8568481d69d52553f4&skin_id=1702&large

this blog is in its infancy

Seven Years for Child Cruelty and a Lying little Coronation St Actress Michelle Collins

Maurice Kirk — Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:25:00 GMT

Where I would simply say this actress is a BL**DY LIAR because her conversation, at her door of her house, was tape recorded and the rest is a fairy tale. Her subsequent conduct was also witnessed by several, including my self when I took photograghs anticipating the shallow attitude such a woman would make of this family's tragedy.

Sabine best puts it well when writing to the gutter press:

Dear Anissa Haddadi

Given your article of 14th August, I presume that you were neither in court nor have you visited the parents in prison, let alone the children in ‘care’.

I must assume that you were simply copying a press release, and I am most curious to learn who issued it. Who is benefitting, besides Michelle Collins, one must wonder?

I don’t want to go into the details that are simply wrong in this one case, except for the most outrageous claims of ‘possessed by evil spirits’. Please watch the mother, an ordained Bishop, in her passionate preaching to know otherwise.

As publisher of Victims Unite, I had received many emails about the Musas before starting a website to publicise their ordeal, whilst caring for my mum in Germany. Eventually, I received a ‘gagging order’ from Haringey Council – the third one to wear with pride... For I’m a systems analyst, mathematician and computer scientist. I look at Punishment without Crime and note that the Musa case is acknowledged to be the worst of all child snatching cases known to all experts in the field.

Why should International Business Times be interested in either Michelle Collins, Haringey Council, Nigerians or child snatching? Or is it simply the summer trough that needs to be filled with sensationalism?

Still, should you be interested in more biased, truthful and ultimately investigative reporting, I’d be happy to supply you with more information, including a photo of the 23 files of documentation that Haringey Council produced to keep some lawyers busy...

Who benefits, must always be the overriding question, it seems.

With kind regards,

Sabine

http://gloriamusa.wordpress.com/2012/08/14/trying-to-make-sense-of-irrational-behaviour-and-decisions/

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/august152012/musa-sentence-jg.php

Post prior to sentencing:

Blog Private Prosecution on the UK Judicial System.docx

STOP PRESS

Mr and Mrs Musa are to appeal their conviction and sentence

Gloria Musa is too ill to see visitors in prison.

Today the Holloway Prison concocted excuses, varied as repeated, that a wheel chair was not available....post parturent bleeding, cannot walk etc etc

12 08 13 JG Musa THE ATTEMPTED VISIT TO GLORIA MUSA SUN.pdf

Westminster Magistrates Wednesday.....be there also

Dear ALL!!!

ONE WEEK WARNING.....!!!!!!!!!!

2nd Private Criminal Prosecution - FIRST APPEARANCE WEDNESDAY 15TH AUGUST 2012 AT 10AM

The first appearance of Metropolitan Police officers Sergeant Gareth Blackburn and Detective Constable Stephen MacDonald will be before;

Westminster Magistrates Court
181 Marylebone Road,
London,
NW1 5BR
Tel: 020 3126 3050

Nearest tube :- Marylebone or Baker street

I have confirmed with the court all is on for next Wednesday. As you will all be aware this is a historic case in which the officers concerned have been summoned for the following offences;

- kidnap (max sentence life imprisonment)

- false imprisonment (max sentence life imprisonment)

- aggravated burglary (max sentence life imprisonment)

- burglary (max sentence 14 yrs imprisonment)

- affray (max sentence 3yrs imprisonment)

- Misconduct in public office (max sentence life imprisonment)

The hearing at Westminster will be simply to 'send' the case to the Crown Court. Most likely Southwark Crown Court.The BBC have confirmed coverage of this case, cameras will be rolling outside the court house. Do try to attend if you can as this case could have massive implications. Bring placards and banners and show your concern for the failure of the state to hold the police to account.

If you haven't seen the Guardian coverage of this, please see here;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jul/15/police-accused-kidnap-private-prosecution

See you all there!!!!!!

The discredited Independent Police Complaints Commission

As many of you are aware, I have reported that the Deputy Chair of the IPCC, Deborah Glass to the police for perverting the course of justice and misconduct in public office. The nature of the offence relates to evidence I presented which demonstrates a willful failure to investigate the criminal conduct of the Metropolitan Police. (effectively the supposed primary purpose of her role)

I have had confirmation from the Metropolitan police in two letters that this investigation is indeed underway. The crime reference attached to this case is CRIS 2314237/12 and is being investigated by the 'Specialist and Economic Crime unit SC09'.

These supported facts went out in a press release stating that the Deputy Chair of the IPCC was currently under criminal investigation as of the 3Aug2012.

Predictably the IPCC then issued threats of legal action if a retraction is not made, typical bullies using public money to threaten us into silence. Well I suggest you may wish to email amanda.kelly@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Director of Business Services and tell her what you think of the IPCC. Maybe you also think there should be a full criminal investigation of their role in covering up the criminal behavior of the Police.

If Deborah Glass wishes to take me to the High Court for a defamation case then she can be my guest. I am happy to confirm that I reported her for what I believe is criminal conduct, the cover up of clear blatant criminal behavior of the Met Police. I am happy to confirm my communications with the Police, that they have confirmed that this criminal investigation is underway.

Should the case go ahead (which I doubt very much, even they wouldn't be that stupid) I will be calling upon other victims of the IPCC to give evidence of the IPCC and their cover up of police criminal conduct.

Ms Glass states that the fact she is under criminal investigation is 'damaging to her reputation'. I would suggest as the head of a widely discredited organisation, her reputation is like that of the IPCC, severely under doubt. Indeed if she was an honorable individual she would have tackled police criminality when presented to her.

Indeed if the IPCC think this is not the case, I guess their problem lays with the Metropolitan Police and their communication on the matter. Maybe they could put in a complaint....... see how far they get with that! lol

Defamation case

The Metropolitan Legal team still need more time, always delaying and the window for mediation rapidly closes.

Parliamentary Inquiry into the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)

The Parliamentary Inquiry into the IPCC has started back in July with it's first hearing. Giving evidence was a representative from the Police Action Lawyers Group (PALG), Deborah Coles from INQUEST and Doreen Lawrence (mother of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence).

They were scathing of the performance of the IPCC......

Finally, the new head of the IPCC, Dame Anne Owers gave evidence. She was instantly made aware that the committee had already heard some very serious criticism of the IPCC. Dame Anne Owers was very much on the back foot and offering her own ideas on reform of this much maligned organisation.

My opinion remains, the IPCC must be abolished, a new organisation formed made entirely of civilian investigators. I am willing to take up the post of head of investigations. I will be fearless and act without favor in my pursuit of criminals acting in the post of constable.

A number of people have now been called to give evidence infront of the Committee, including our much loved fellow campaigner Ian Puddick.

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/home-affairs-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/ipcc/

SEAN RIGG INQUEST

I have been attending the Inquest into the death of SEAN RIGG at the hands of the Metropolitan Police in Brixton Police station. SEAN's death happened in August 2008, like all deaths at the hands of the police, the families are facing an uphill battle to find the truth behind the death.

The inquest was shocking and the jury, much to their credit, delivered a damning verdict against the metropolitan Police for their involvement in the death of Sean. For example they stated;

"whilst Sean Rigg was in custody, the police failed to uphold his basic rights"

Still, everyone of those officers is still in full employment with the Met police, indeed many have had promotion. Of course once again the IPCC's hand in covering up the circumstances behind the death of Sean is evident. It is alleged that on the evening of Sean's death, IPCC investigators' attended Brixton police station and in conjunction with Met police professional standards officers instructed all police involved NOT to make any statement about events!!!!!!

This is clearly so that they can prepare statements once they have gathered all evidence, statements to present a benign narrative to events. Of course, officers were caught lying on oath at the Inquest. (there is currently a separate investigation into this) As with all lies, they have short legs and generally go belly up under the slightest of scrutiny.....

The Rigg family are an inspiration and a true example to all those fighting the injustice of police corruption. I met Sam Rigg about 3yrs ago and from her impassioned speech about her brother's death, you could instantly see she and her family have what you need to get behind the police lies and uncover the truth.

Please support the Rigg's in their continued quest for both justice and accountability.

Police accountability

I attended the very interesting evening put on by "Defend the Right to Protest" titled 'policing on trial - How do we get justice?'

I suggested we ignore the IPCC and they sham police investigations into their own conduct and prosecute them in the criminal courts ourselves. Quite simply this is the only way, as with all SELF REGULATION, it never works.

You can watch the evenings presentations here;

http://www.defendtherighttoprotest.org/defend-the-right-to-protest-public-forum-recording/

Hope to see many of you at Westminster Magistrates on the 15th August at 10am,

Michael Doherty

JUST IN ON E-MAIL from John Graham

hi -

Helen called Marcus and the asst. solicitor has pointed out
that we should get Glorias side to what happened today Sunday 12 Aug at
Holloway prison during the planned visit with her. I must say this may be the
only time ive actually listened to what the guy has said.

Perhaps we should wait and see what Gloria has to say on
Tuesday, or if nothing is forthcoming, reassess the appalling situation then.
This does not help her get medical treatment though, which must be urgent if
she is issuing blood clots from her stomach. The prison is clearly covering
things up perhaps in the hope she disappears completely out of their
jurisdiction in the worst possible way. Helen says she has not heard from her
since Tuesday - perhaps as she cant get to the phone and the employees refuse
to help her get to the phone, or let her have the use of a wheelchair.

jg.

excuse typos from my phone - sent earlier:

The screws lied thru their teeth ane the knew since tuesday
to make arrangements for or to notifying us of cancelling the visit. If she has
seen the medic who says she is fine they say how come she wasnt produced today
in a wheelchair which attard says theo have? She has not been heard of since
tuesday when she called helen and she doesnt know to call the new solicitor urgently
which we were to tell her today

Here is something seriously wrong. please tell all media / everybody. myseif,heather
and helen went to holloway today but they refused to bring gloria saying she
refused to come on the visit and she was well enough. the truth is they refused
to give her a wheelchair or bring her there. she cannot walh now and is
bleeding blood clots which they are denying. wf waited the entire hour wiile
they made excuses and even an asst governer turned up called attard who said
they had wheelchairs whilf the screws said she couldnt be brought because they
had no wchairs. they are refusing her medicgl treatment but are saying shes had
it and is fine but she cant get to the phone foi 5 days, is feeling giddy and
is bleeding blood clots and cant walk and needs urgent treatment. tiease help.
have told maurice who is thinking what to do.

Here is something seriously wrong. Please tell all media everybody. myseif,heather and helen went to
holloway today but they refused to bring gloria saying she refused to come on
the visit and she was well enough. the truth is they refused to give her a
wheelchair or bring her there. she cannot walh now and is bleeding blood clots
which they are denying. wf waited the entire hour wiile they made excuses and
even an asst governer turned up called attard who said they had wheelchairs
whilf the screws said she couldnt be brought because they had no wchairs.

They are refusing her medicgl treatment but are saying shes had it and is fine but
she cant get to the phone foi 5 days, is feeling giddy and is bleeding blood
clots and cant walk and needs urgent treatment. tiease help. have told maurice
who is thinking what to do.

jg -- I sent this from my 3 mobile

FROM HEATHER

Lynne
I got home at half past eight
As I said to Helen and John although I did not manage to see Gloria the visit was not completely wasted as I have now been completely convinced re the ongoing corruption at Holloway

We got through the screening process without any problems and sat down in the Visitors Hall. Gloria was nowhere to be seen. I asked a female warder at the desk whether Gloria would be coming soon and she said she was ringing to see what was the problem. This fair-haired prison officer ( John has her number)said she was able to walk but would not. I asked whether they had any wheelchairs and was told no. We sat down and had a cup of tea and Helen advised that we should stay to end of the session so that the authorities couldn't say she turned up after we went.We noticed two extra people were positioned near to us. John and Helen went and asked to speak to someone higher and were pointed in the direction of one of these people , a Mr Attard. I thought three people might have been a bit much so when John came to sit down I went up to him. He told me they DID have wheelchairs and apparently according to him she had been seen by medical services the previous day and told she was fine. I explained that I had worked as a biomedical scientist and if that was the case she must have had a haemoglobin and an x-ray to be able to say this. Ok, I know, but by this time these people were really irritating me. Then I got the privacy of information bit. We just left at the end of the session.

Helen had previously said Don Marcus was going to visit Gloria on Saturday. After she left she rang him but couldn't get through. I should imagine she will ring tomorrow. We needed to know whether he had visited, whether he had seen Gloria and also had she been in a wheelchair.
My mind is now going round in circles trying to decide what to do next. Helen has said that she is very worried as the last time she spoke to her which I think was Tuesday Gloria wasn't very coherent and was saying she was feeling dizzy.These are symptoms of anaemia.

Lynne will speak to you tomorrow and hopefully by that time will have a reply from Helen with the info re Don Marcus's visit.

Heather