Legal Battles : McKenzie Friends, Abuse of Process

Sabine McNeill & Secrecy of our Family Courts

Maurice Kirk — Thu, 02 Jul 2015 08:48:00 GMT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPW4Bac3hDI&feature=player_detailpage

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNvQFlFy9Cs

Infringement Notice 15 07 07 Alun Cairns MP.docx

See Face Book,You Tube & petitions......BUT study the facts yourself

Common Assault Trial 25th June Arrest of HM Crown Prosecutor Totally without Merit?

Maurice Kirk — Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:39:00 GMT

THE BACK GROUND

12 04 21 MJK REDACTED Psychiatric Summary.pdf

13 01 27 SWP Dr MJK to Morgan Cole HHJ SL.pdf

1970's Taunton Somerset police station back door, before the camera and sign on it was quickly installed following the collapse of fire arms allegations in Taunton Magistrates, with proven perjury from information within some missing chief inspector's personal note book

This weekend's latest police forced encounter was my visit to the police station, to lay theft charges, which soon appeared to cause the perambulation of my vehicle some five or six times around a Barry round about for the driver to receive a road side breath test.

THE INCIDENT

On 23rd April 2013 David Gareth Evans was arrested in the foyer of the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre under CCTV coverage.

I asked for the CCTV record to be preserved.

I asked the HM court staff to call the police.

PRIOR TO POLICE INTERVIEW

I instructed lawyers to obtain relevant disclosure, under the control of police, Crown Prosecution Service and HM court Service, for meaningful legal argument, in higher courts but as of 23rd June 2013 all Cardiff institutions have refused.

This is one of the reasons

This is another

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/maurices_picks/Abuse-of-Process.aspx

THE INTERVIEW UNDER CAUTION

The arrested CPS lawyer had, with malice aforethought, manipulated criminal allegations against me, for example, by

a) fabricating a court exhibit, at the very last moment, of an internally post office re directed franked letter, containing a WANTED poster, purported to have been posted by me to the Caswell Clinic. It was only introduced as evidence at the beginning of evidence by the psychiatrist because Evans had overlooked the fact that none of the other six allegations of harassment carried no custodial sentence.

b) avoiding 'evidence in chief' from the psychiatrist that he had fabricated that I had' significant brain damage' and a possible brain tumour due to South Wales Police 'pressure' (black-mail over a fellow psychiatrist, a Dr Janis Hillier) for justification for registering me as MAPPA level 3 and jailed, facing a mandatory 10 year sentence, over some dilapidated and decommissioned WW1 machine gun, sold a year earlier and still bolted to a replica display aircraft sitting many hundreds of miles away in an open hangar! http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/news/latestnews/5000624.Barry_s__Flying_Vet__Maurice_Kirk_cleared_of_firearms_charges/

c) misleading the jury, at the May 2012 trial for 'breach of a restraining order', when he knew I had never had been served, in the Magistrates cells on 1st December 2011, a final copy of a restraining order as both court and custody records clearly confirm

This lawyer had already informed His Honour Judge Curran, before an audience of witnesses, that the 'draft' part hand written document, that had originally been ordered by District Judge John Charles to be taken down to my cell for approval, was still in 'his control' and still at the Merthyr Tydfil CPS office. Why this court document was not stored in the HM magistrates, with a breach indictment now laid, beggars belief.

Is that why, ever since, neither HM court, GEOamey Custodial Services or CPS head office (Cardiff), refuse to disclose anything!

d) misleading the magistrates in refusing me bail, for most of last summer, following this same police psychiatrist fabricating yet another S9 witness victim statement this time stating I that had been around to the home of Dr Janis Hillier and himself requiring the police to be called to 'move him on'.

I knew not nor do I wish to know where either of them live which may explain why the police continue to refuse to disclose my multi page statement of complaint dictated to a PC Holder nor furnish this coming trial with the psychiatrist's 21st July 12 or thereabouts, complaint that had me incarcerated with all allegations eventually dropped

e) misleading the court in refusing me bail, because of my failure to attend a 28th Nov 11 hearing, when the Cardiff prison had been instructed by the CPS not to produce me

f) misleading successive courts into stating I had an 'actual bodily harm' conviction in 1980.

this list is not exhaustive

THE FACTS

As much as I would like to publish the evidence, to be used on Tuesday 25th June 2013 at Cardiff Magistrates, the risk of contaminating the truth prevents me from so doing.

My having called for police, whilst placing the arrest under the video camera in the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, will implicate the nefarious conduct of so many since the Dolmans, solicitors, fabricated 25th February 2009 sworn affidavit was signed by the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, denying police broke into my Cardiff veterinary surgery or there were Barry magistrates hearings all relating to covert surveillance and collusion with Guernsey's insular authorities.

Both Cardiff's judiciary and penal systems are, time after time, shown to be adversely affected by to 'HM's sinister influence and in particular that of the conduct HM court staff's repeatedly failing to disclose public records such as the jury asked for.

Ring leaders include Luigi Stranati , HM area court manger for South Wales who has attempted, since at least as far back as 2003, to have me registered as a Section 42 'Vexatious Litigant'.

On 1st December 2011 many litigants in person (LiPs) in the magistrates' public gallery saw David Gareth Evans, CPS prosecutor, hand up to District Judge John Charles, in our so called open court system, the CPS draft version of a proposed 'restraining order' against me following my conviction under 1998 Prevention of Harassment Act over fabricated NHS psychiatric reports to obtain my level 3 MAPPA status.

to 'protect' the 'victim' from further harassment.

Judge Charles put short shrift to its content and boldly and set about altering the document, by way of his fountain pen and then instructed the clerk to have it taken down to me, in the cells, for my 'approval'.

I neither read the document nor would have anything to do with it, save a glance of it in the jailer's hand, quite unaware of its relevance. He took it out of my cell and I assume, returned it to the CPS or court clerk.

Either way it promptly 'disappeared' with my sudden release with no final 'restraining order' or knowledge of it, coming my way. HM controlled CCTV camera stragegically placed at the exit gate of the custody suite, controlled by Stranati, was denied disclosure but compounded by the fact that five angry GEO Amey private jailers, for being kept waiting after 5pm. had fisickly thrown me out through the door followed by my pair of crutches being thrown onto my head as I lay prostrate on the concrete.

Why?

Gareth David Evans had overlooked the fact that the six allegations of my harassing a NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic member of staff failed to include an incident that carried the statutory custodial sentence should I be found guilty when I had been in prison for many months already.

Coupled with the court's shock of seeing ten of my friends and human rights workers in the public gallery, at the beginning of the trial and 'blow by blow' coverage of daily proceedings on internet sites, world wide, the Welsh press censorship being legendary, Evans slipped in the seventh allegation, of my having sent a 'WANTED' poster by post to a doctor.

My deliberate act, following the updated list being handed to me in the 'dock', of screwing it up and throwing it to the ground, had the desired effect by it being published in the Glamorgan Gem.

The 4th May 2012 Crown Court jury, following the alleged breach of the so called order, heard that the cell incident, of the FINAL document being officially served on a prisoner upon his release, was all caught on a series of CCTV cameras and the drafting and final production of the finishing 'restraining order' were 'recorded' in the HM court records.

HM Judge Curran QC refused the jury any of it, having received their jury note, stating there was no such evidence 'available' leaving the jury without explanation. Why?

Barrister Evans had old the judge, in front of both myself and my Mackenzie Friend, MB, that he may now have to be a defence witness because of his part hand written part typed draft, brought down into my cell on 1st Dec11, was up in Merthyr Tydfil CPS office.

So why didn't the judge stop the trial?

Lord Leveson, later, at the Criminal Court of Appeal, appeared to do likewise. Why?

The judge, on Tuesday, will have had HM orders to block the truth coming out by labelling my reasons for the arrest 'totally without merit'. Why ?

ANSWER

The Continuing cover up of my 2009 fabricated Caswell Clinic psychiatric reports for Barbara Wilding to obtain my MAPPA level 3 registration to frustrate the on going civil actions against her.

TRUTH must not come out

THE CHARGE

Police continue to withhold custody records and send me the wrong DVD while Cardiff court continue to refuse to disclose the record (court log), the jury had asked for, that a draft restraining order or even final order being produced before I was 'gate arrested', in the magistrates foyer and taken to London in hand cuffs for 'failing to attend court' two days earlier! HMP Cardiff had refused to produce me and that 'failure to attend court' conviction has been used, ever since, to successfully oppose my bail.

Wrong video? Deliberate?

Private Prosecution.wmv

My Judicial Review Application is BLOCKED

As with RCJ Morgan J, over South Wales Police ring leaders in the Cardiff hushed up three month trial, the government is left with blocking exposure of the ever increasing corruption in the judiciary and those profit from it, by now blocking members of the public applying for judicial reviews or calling for 'protected' deceitful doctors/lawyers, working for the police, to be properly investigated

See rough template for your MP to receive, asap, to be 'aware' before it is too late.

13 06 24 JR format to MPs.docx

I AM STILL REGISTERED AS A MENTAL PATIENT.......Deliberate? Or just the 'gulag card; dealt again?

My Bristol solicitor and Cardiff barrister are continued to be refused Crown Court copy of all the exhibits in first, the 1st Dec 11 Magistrates appeal, re harassment conviction, in 1st March 12 Judge Hughes hearing and secondly, in May 2012 jury trial, re 'breach of a restraining order' I never had served on me in the first place!

These few examples of wide spread criminal conduct is best described as a new form of a liturgy worshipped but causing serious judicial 'melt down' of a system that this country was once very proud about

So could South wales Police so stoop in my civil action?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23022634?print=true#story_continues_1%23story_continues_1.

Lord Leveson Mr Justices Mitting & Males REFUSE Maurice's Applic for NHS (Wales) Falsified MAPPA Psychiatric Reports to be CORRECTED OR CLARIFIED

Maurice Kirk — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:56:00 GMT

JUDGMENT

14th March 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal, whilst sitting in Cardiff, refused Maurice Kirk both legal representation and clarificationion as to whether he had 'significant brain damage’ and 'possible' cancer reported to 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, by a South Wales police psychiatrist, whilst recommending his victim be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Prison for the doctor’s own safety, from an interested third party, an elderly Norman Scarth Esq.

That makes 14 UK judges, now, protecting NHS (Wales) and South Wales Police policy and damned the danger to the general public, to allow servicer of the 'Gulag card' on anyone who dares threaten their

pensions

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2013-03-14a.147843.h&s=speaker%3A11420#g147843.q0

Maurice's very simple submission, today, stating, at the out set he only wanted his psychiatric reports corrected or clarified.

They had already had the refusal drafted months ago

Maurice asked for an ajournment for legal representation but was refused.

Maurice asked it be adjourned owing to a JR application was outstanding about the circus of District Judge John Charles circus on 1st December 2011....Maurice was refused

Their Lordships already had this document from me, knocked up at 6am on the day, served on them for Cyberr space world wide ECHR and CCRC

Please note today's court judgment is a stark warning to others in Wales of what has been going on re the practice of false psychiatric reports understood by no one, not even the writer.

This judgment means trouble

Criminal Court of Appeal ref: 201203241 D2

At Cardiff Crown Court ref: CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012

1CF 03546

Regina v Maurice John Kirk

Application to Appeal

SUMMARY

The trial was unsafe because:

The jury was denied the defence evidence

Extract taken from 4^th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court hearing at approx. 10.45am

JUDGE CURRAN: Do you intend give evidence?

MR KIRK: It depends on whether you let me get my legal papers that are down stairs.

JUDGE CURRAN: Mr Kirk, I am not going to let you get at what you call your legal papers.

(The Appellant was not allowed to be present or allowed to call any defence witnesses)

The jury was misdirected

Jury note(s) to the learned judge they received a response, in the forced absence of the Appellant, that there was ‘no evidence’ from both the custody manager and court clerk’s contemporaneous notes and CCTV footage stored from GEOamey Custody Services cameras positioned both in the Appellant’s cell and in the long custody suite corridor or from the HM court’s controlled cameras at both exit of the custody suite and building.

LEE BARKER, the custody suite manager said, both on oath and in his witness statement, that he ‘served’ the ‘restraining order’ in the cell after he had to first unlocked the cell door.

MICHAEL WILLIAMS said, both on oath and in his witness statement, that he saw served on the Appellant the ‘restraining order’ whilst the Appellant was on crutches in the corridor returning from the toilets. Potential weapons, such as crutches, are not allowed in that area.

CCTV cameras recorded the part hand written ‘restraining order’ remained in BARKER’S hand , whilst in the cell and recorded the Appellant literately being dragged out and thrown out of the suite by no less than five angry custody officers who then threw his crutches onto his head as he lay on the floor of the public corridor. The camera at the exit of the building recorded defence witnesses, called to give evidence, seeing the Appellant both in hand cuffs and in a wheel chair.

The jury was subjected to a ‘An Abuse of Process’

The psychiatrist subjected the Appellant to the NHS (Wales) zero tolerance policy thereby seriously prejudicing current civil litigation from 20 years of persistent police bullying by

a) Causing the Appellant to be registered, in Barry police station, on 8^th June 2009, a MAPPA level 3 victim, to be one of the 5% most dangerous so registered and then

b) On the 22^nd June 2009 caused the Appellant to be arrested and remanded in custody on dreamed up fire arms charges over a WWI antique Lewis machine gun and then

c) had the Appellant, on 7^th august 2009, sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, without even examining his own patient and then

d) without the appropriate qualifications and contrary to others with appropriate qualifications, recommended to a Crown Court, on 2^nd December 2009, that the Appellant be further incarcerated into Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison for the doctor’s own safety (see para39 of 19^th October 2009 psychiatric report) and then

e) The psychiatrist wrote that the Appellant had ‘significant brain damage’ with the court being told, in the forced absence of the Appellant, that he possibly had cancer’

f) The Appellant has NEVER been supplied with the evidence, clarification or retraction of such nonsense despite this Appellant’s last application before this very same Criminal Court of Appeal for that very same purpose

g) The mischief by Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams continues

Last July he signed a ‘victim’ statement that the Appellant had harassed him at his home with his wife, Dr Janis Hillier, also of Caswell Clinic, to such an extent that they are now both on ‘extended sick leave’. The lies continued in that he also stated police had to be called to the scene but with Appellant’s subsequent imprisonment ending by all charges being dropped.

4 Section 1 (3) of 1997 Harassment Act provides a DefenceThe Appellant was not allowed at the1^st December 2010 summary hearing, while facing ‘harassment’ allegations of the police doctor, at its subsequent 1^st March 2013 appeal or even at the 4^th May 2013 jury trial to put a legal argument that the police doctor had knowingly committed crime, due to police black mail and therefore the Appellant was permitted

a) that it was pursued for the purposes of preventing or detecting crime

b) that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment

c) that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable

Maurice J Kirk BVSc 14^th March 2013

SO WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4G0vYqzTc

At my age the evilness from UK courts' cartel is but small beer.

I broadcast a taste of last time I was in front of Their Lordships, in the Royal Courts of Justice, on another futile appeal, having served yet another prison sentance caused by Dr Tegwyn Williams, re a Cardiff judge daring to suggest, ney insult my intellegence, that he would order and obtain, bloody liar, for the NHS (Wales) to produce the evidence I was to be sent to Ashworth ipp as a public hazard.

Who filmed this, quite without my knowing and definitely without my approval , I do not know but had I known I would not of been so subservient......and the rest.

Dr Tewgwyn Wlliams black mailed by police to recommend to His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC that I be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison 'for his own safety'!..... see paragraph 39

4th Williams Psych Reprt 19 10 9.pdf

9 12 1 medical Kemp.pdf

Dr Tegwyn Williams' wrong doing?

The Appellant believes Dr Tegwyn Williams is an unaccountable Clinical Director who can call on NHS lawyers and NHS chiefs to cover up his wrongdoing. It is in papers, that were not before the Courts in this case, that Dr Tegwyn Williams is that unaccountable that he calls on the support of the Chief of local NHS and Welsh NHS to use police to stop complaints about him going to the General Medical Council

Dr TW to help his associates (some local police) in a civil dispute, Sectioned the Appellant, without first assessing him, when the Appellant was not a patient of those kinds of services.

Dr TW then entirely made up that the Appellant had significant irreversible brain damage and made application to indefinitely Section the appellant to High Security Hospital. He failed in his attempted to indefinitely Section as no other medical doctor would support him.

The point is that Dr Tegwyn Williams is not medically qualified to interpret brain scans, as that is the job of the neuro-radiologist who has training and qualifications so to do. Dr Tegwyn Williams does not use or invite anyone who was medically qualified.

The Clinic team wrote in the team assessment from the three monthly Sections at the Caswell Clinic, that they wanted to build a relationship with the Appellant as an outpatient and draw him in.

But each time the Appellant would attend Caswell clinic Dr Tegwyn Williams would arrange that Police were called to arrest him.

In the end, to prevent the General Medical Council acting on what Dr Tegwyn Williams does wrong, he brought zero tolerance prosecutions by claiming, in short, that lawful accurate comments that were not defamatory, made him feel harassed.

Changes in law and interpretations.

Does it matter that what the Appellant says is accurate and not defamatory and now changes in the law (reform of public order Section 5) also means that an insult is no longer meant to be harassment ?

Also Courts have decided to recognise playful or eccentric comments as not malicious and with the example of a jovial threat to blow up the airport as meaning to be light hearted.

That light hearted meaning is very relevant to the Appellant as his ‘Wanted posters’, were clearly meant to be light hearted comment from a man well now as a harmless eccentric.

Where is the proportionality in wanting to imprison a 67 year old man for making accurate, reasonable, eccentric, light hearted but entirely justified and necessary comment ?

Stafford NHS scandal, the Need for Freedom of Expression and Appellant’s course of conduct and alleged Breach, can stop suffering and worse.

Mr Jeremy Hunt, the Coalition Health Minister encourages the need for people to be able to speak out when things go wrong in the NHS and that no gagging Orders should exist on NHS conduct. Especially as around 1200 people needlessly died at Stafford as there was no where to complain and little way to speak out

There are said to be at least fifteen other hospital Trust like Stafford.

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and “incompatibility”

The Appellant would be raises whether the Criminal Court of Appeal would grant permission for an application to ague “incompatibility” on how the Act is not compatible with Human and Fundamental Rights and that Parliament could not have known the effect that it’s legislation would have.

As we are aware it is for the Higher Courts to declare incompatibility and for Parliament to remove that incompatibility, if it so wishes.

It is said that the ‘course of conduct’ in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is unique to the UK. No other country has it. Other countries make do with stalking laws and other like measures. One reason why all other countries do not use ‘a course of conduct’ as a criminal offence is that it is said that this kind of law is open to too many problems and abuse.

One of the four cornerstones of EU law is that a person must be able to tell that their conduct would be a criminal offence. The UK law interprets that as would know with advice of a lawyer.

Yet full time Judges decide on if a course of conduct amount to harassment in ways that the best lawyers in the UK cannot predict how Judges will interpret what amounts to harassment in for example the zero tolerance, white collar, neighbour or family disputes. The appellant believes that means that the Protection from Harassment Act is clearly not compatible with EU law, and that is but one example.

With the Malicious Communications Act 2003, a new stalking law and various other measures and that the Harassment Act is know to be so widely over used and miss used, many call for the 1997 Act to fade away, in favour of expanding the scope of other laws

Maurice John Kirk BVSc

12 March 2013

My 64 page statement completed as police helicopter hovered over head as armed police surrounded the matrimonial home (see blog below of home and aerodrome up for auction due to a broken marriage) with frightend wife citing this incident, in divorce papers, due to Operation Orchid, to snatch our then 10 year old daughter at the same time as my hand cuffs clicked on.

Who will be next to suffer under power crazy South Wales Police Hierarchy?

09 06 19 64 pages of Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirkl.pdf

Maurice Kirk v Dr T W Williams.docx

11 03 10 Dr T W position statement (1).pdf

GMC.pdf

Glamorgan Gem 30th Sept 10.pdf

10 09 06 SWP_Claimant_interim_Skeleton.pdf

TO stop this trial from starting Dolmans, solicitors advised Barbara Wilding and MAPPA meetings in Caswell Clinic, would you believe, on how to instigate her Metropolitan Police intorduced tactic of a 'shoot to kill' policy but first she had had to get me registered MAPPA level 3, using Dr Williams, in order for it to be a 'lawful kill'

the 22nd June 09 police raid , using well over twenty, some armed, police officers, and helicopter, under Operation Chalice' to surround our home was co-ordinjated with anotter pack of police officers , under Operation Orchid' in order to snatch our daughter.....telling my wife I was so dangerous a threat to her and the general public our Genevieve was to be 'taken into care'. Kirstie had other ideas.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/aircaraft_and_airshows/South-Wales-Airfield-FOR-SALE.aspx

10 12 7 MJK MAPPA Executive Summary.pdf

To stop this on going trial , currently in Cardiff County Court, for police now proven police criminal conduct and harassment damages, from ever reaching cross examination stage, first it was 'my possession of a machine gun 'fiasco and then the State playing this fabricated medical 'findings', their 'Gulag Card', as seventeen years of police harassment, so far and HM assisted 'treacle treatment; whough Cardiff's iniquitous law courts had failed to block the true state of both our law courts , prisons and police forces, right across The Principality.

09 09 03 MG Trans Redacted.pdf

Their Lordships, together with the documentary evidence that Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams knowingly falsified, in the presence of South Wales Police officers, his Sect 9 countersigned witness statements, to obtain my false imprisonment, are to consider the 'ramifications' of the enclosed transcript from part of 4th May 12 'Breach of Restraining Order' conviction hearing, now the subject of their deliberations.

The transcript clearly indicates, just as in the 2010 'machine gun' scandalous jury tria, l was refused even my legal papers and personal court exhibits even in thew court room!

On 4th May2012 His Honour Judge Curran QC, whilst I was forced to be absent due to requiring urgent medical attention, had refused me Dr Williams or any others, named, to be either my 'character witness' or as a 'witness of fact'.

On 1st December 2011 District Judge John Charles had done exactly the same, in my absence, when he convict me for 'harassment' of Dr Williams following the publishing of further falsifed documents by Dr Tegwyn Williams, namely, my series of NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic psychiatric reports culminating, on 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court, that I be further sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, due to 'significant brain damage' and 'possible cancer', in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison.

Closer scutiny of my Casswel Clinic, Bridgend, medical records, discloses, as in his October 2009 psychiatric report, his other and most pressing reason as to why I had to be moved to Broadmoor or Ashworth was because of 'veiled' threats , he told me, of 'reprisals' by an old gentleman by the name of Norman Scarth!

T20120090 - Kirk - proc from 10.40 - 12.26 - 04.05.12.pdf

Experts in the field confirm there was no sign of relevant brain damage BEFORE Williams even writes the report without appropriate qualifications.

On 7th August 09, when he wrote his first released psychiatric report, [previous others only for MAPPA South Wales Police meetings], as His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC stated, when refusing, recently, to 'strike out' my one million pound damages claim against NHS (Wales), without evening examining his patient!

09 09 01radiologist scans report.pd

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 12 17 Court Hearing to Extend IPP.pdf

http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/03/20/the-supreme-court-on-harassment-purpose-and-rationality/#more-17700

You may like to Google 'The Real Maurice Kirk' and come to the County Court tomorrow and Crown court on Thursday

ps My birthday is on Tuesday

Quiz Time:

What does a Duchess, a dairy maid and a cow have in common

clue:

It was most unlikely my father fought on the D-Day Beaches

Answer:

Work it out for yourself

my e-mail is maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Subject:

Signing up to 'I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK' at PledgeBank.com

Please click on the link below to confirm your signature on the
pledge at the bottom of this email.

http://www.pledgebank.com/L/BVyQLvFuTJTaBt79hA

The pledge was created by Patrick Cullinane and reads:

'I will I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the
Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st
October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of
JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK but only if 150 other
people from the UK will do the same. We the People in the UK
have been denied our GUARANTEED RIGHTS to due-process via the
Common Law Trial by Jury, which is the Law of the Land.'

Yours,
the PledgeBank.com team

ends

Cardiff's Judicial Cabal Caught Conspiring Playing the Race Card

Maurice Kirk — Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:17:00 GMT

So, following my May ‘Breach of a Restraining Order' jury trial conviction and the fact we all knew, from the start, it was all faked, we each having our own agenda on how the trial was to be conducted; now it is pay-back time.

We witnessed Cardiff cabal's latest bit of skulduggery, their refusal in accepting there was no ‘restraining order' even having been printed when, on 1^st December last, I was supposed to of had it officially served on me down in the magistrates' cells by some privately employed custody lackey.

Did anyone one sign for it, did anyone log it into either the magistrates or custody logs, did anyone hear me say anything or even agree to its terms in order to be released, as was, that day? - No, of course not. The evil little shits had already swept away so many procedural rules, in the past, what was the worry for a few more?

Their pre-planned second term of imprisonment, one of nine months, was to further hamper my preparation for the numerous outstanding civil damages claims against the South Wales Police and especially for the latest malicious prosecution, the ‘Lewis machine gun' conspiracy. Can they not just forget King Edward and simply move on?

Is not a shame I let so few know, over twenty years living in the Principality, my grandmother was a Morgan and my eminent grandfather was a Jenkins?

Is it not a shame Dolmans, solicitors, http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/South-Wales-Police-Conspiracy-to-Have-me-Shot.aspx with their own little conspiracy, to ‘pervert the course of justice' for their client, Barbara Wilding, did not appear to know before instructing their Mr Nightingale to get me arrested.

09 06 20 SWP Dolmans MG 11.pdf

As you read in his 20^thJune 2009 statement had he detected a Welsh accent over the phone I may never of then been incarcerated for nearly eight months at Her Majesty's Pleasure.

As in the ‘machine gun' case we all knew the police had had to paint her a different colour, in order to attempt to fool the jury, long before the 2010 trial started, as it was to be hawked
around the country first, almost two thousand miles I calculated from my cell, to try and find a tame prosecution witness to say what they wanted in order to get that ten year custodial sentence if two rogue doctors could not be found for IPP and a certain life sentence.

So, once again, a similar bunch of Cardiff judges were rolled out to again turn a ‘blind eye' this time to fact that, for a conspiracy to succeed, basic court procedures, CPS responsibilities and policing methods all had to be thoroughly distorted.

For the facts to fit the case there just had to have been some prior planning even before the 1^st December Harassment conviction.

What the cabal had planned, for their ‘breach of restraining order' scam, was for a much longer custodial sentence from the preceding summary offence of ‘harassment' and NOT just the eighteen weeks prison term District John Charles had just read out straight from his government instruction pamphlet!

But Charles had to ‘about turn' at the very last moment because just too many in the public gallery were up to speed of what the Cardiff cabal had orchestrated.

Once this judge realised the audience knew the prosecution exhibits had been switched mid trial and seven police had already advised the accused that both his pamphlets appeared legal then both he and the CPS barrister, David Gareth Evens, now had real problems.

Also, to obtain a prison sentence, I would of have to have posted to or telephone to the complainant directly but evidence, following cross examination, showed neither could have occurred, incident three disclosing the posted purported wanted poster envelope having been written by someone in the postal service as a redirected letter.

So, in the dying moments of this farce of a trial, the barrister whispered in the ear of the judge but I heard it from the dock, he seeking permission to allow both my ‘Wanted'
versions of the posters, displaying the rogues faces involved in the ‘machine gun'/MAPPA conspiracy, to be admitted as an act of harassment.

Some had just' Wanted' printed above the culprits mug shot, see photo gallery on this web site, while others had ‘Wanted Dead or Alive' the reason for exhibits hurriedly being switched not just in the lower court but again, in March this year, in the Crown Court at the appeal!

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Wanted-for-Attempted-Murder.aspx

Since May I have offered ten or so eye witnesses to give witness statements to the South Wales Police that this latest jury was successfully fooled this time by the need for a Cardiff clerk of the court being used to lie, on oath......an indictment alone as to the desperate measures these individuals are prepared to go now just to preserve their ‘gravy train', ‘jobs for life', cesspit environment while they patiently await autonomy from England's judiciary.

The court clerk stated he had been asked to hide in an unlocked vacant cell by the GEOamey manager, only to poke his head out and peep through the corridor grill when hearing this custody manager speaking to me.

He said from the witness box I had been walking down the corridor, on crutches, from the lavatories when the papers were served.

The custody manager stated things quite differently. He had to unlock my cell door, first, to hand the single piece of paper to me my not even needing to get up from the bench seat on the opposite side of the cell. He, in fact, even stated it was from the CPS for my ‘approval' or not, before taking it back to the court.

It worked alright though; a majority decision was given by the jury but no Exhibit One, a copy of the restraining order, had ever been handed to me until after my arrest and Exhibit
One turned out to be significantly different, yet again, to the two variations, this very week, obtained by His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC during my on-going 20 year damages claims.

It was this rough part hand written unsigned document, the same most likely, that my eight or so witnesses had seen the CPS barrister hand up to the district judge. They all watched him alter, with his fountain pen, in dis approval and then directing the clerk take it to me to see if I agreed.

This action, instead, was palmed off as an authentic ‘Restraining Order' once my release was announced, prison staff expecting to serve it on me to let me out on licence once I had signed as proof of the agreement for my release.

District Judge Charles' sudden change of heart and ordering my release on the same day by shortening and backdating the prison sentence completely cocked up plans of others.

That is why all cctv footage from inside the cell and the corridor was shredded when obviously essential to establish the truth.

It, as is so usual, therefore went all pear shaped with neither court nor custody staff anticipating my retrospective time in custody to count for the eighteen weeks.

I cannot recount the many lies that then followed, from my numerous visits to Cardiff magistrates public counter and phone calls to both Crown Court and CPS offices, once I was told,
over the telephone from Llantwit Major police station, that there was an arrest warrant out for me for breaching a restraining order I had never even seen!

Everyone seemed to be trying to pass the ‘buck', again.

And they still are today and will be tomorrow if someone from Whitehall does not finally step in.

The Restraining Order stated I was not to harass someone who had ‘convinced' nine Cardiff Crown Court Judges' I had ‘significant brain damage' and possible brain tumour. Do you want me to name all these Welsh judges? Well, I suggest you study some of their conduct recorded on the PDFs on web site ‘Downloads'.

But, today, with witness evidence already lodged at Cardiff Central police Station, the police quickly wash their hands of it directing all enquiries to CPS repeatedly refusing me the right to submit four more witness statements or even my own!!!!!

Well over twenty long telephone calls were made yesterday to CPS, Crown Court, police and magistrates and to their bête noir, the Royal Courts of Justice.

No one in Cardiff was prepared to come clean and face the music, the facts so plain for all to see.

One certain named lady of the CPS says we can do nothing with the new evidence as their own barrister was the one who sent his own draft of a proposed
restraining order, written over by Charles using his fountain pen, to my cell, only to be returned to him by the court clerk or custody officer.

Well, she didn't, in fact, word it quite that way.....far too bright; she actually said that until the Criminal Court of Appeal in London granted me ‘leave to appeal' none of this new
evidence from police investigation would even be disclosed to their London CPS office.

"So, what if I had not appealed?"......silence.

Anyway, she said, nothing at all will be done until the London CPS office return papers of my lodged appeal and they have not.

The RCJ told me, yesterday, they were dispatched by them on the 1st June.

This same prosecuting barrister, remember, admitted much this in Crown Court, before Mr Bowen and myself, the former I hasten to say, only in the Dock with me as my Mackenzie Friend and even the presiding judge was tipped off, a man who should never have allowed the case to even start having read the contradictory depositions from the two key
prosecution witnesses.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Police-Block-Further-Statements-being-Taken-.aspx

No, of course the Cardiff police, CPS and HM Court Service, HM prison and GEOamey custody staff will never put up their hand to any of this or the whole HM Partnership , the bed rock upon which welsh version of justice is based, will come tumbling down.

So, what next?

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/HM-Treasury-Solicitors-Office.aspx

All so predictable when dealing with those I have experienced in these past 20 years.

Oh, how I long never ever to have to cross the Severn Bridge ever again in my life, unless, of course, it is to see my daughter.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Evil-Cardiff-Magistrates.aspx

This photo was taken just minutes after my being physically thrown out o fthe cells, after 5pm, by five GEOamey custody officers throwing my crutches on top of my head

IPCC seem to protect the police elswhere in the UK

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/picture2588.aspx

Maurice 'Burnt Out' and Needs Your Help!

Maurice Kirk — Tue, 29 May 2012 14:34:00 GMT

Please, anyone, have a quick look at the enclosed draft appeal to the Criminal Court of Appeal, London and suggest improvements as it has to be deposited there by this Friday's dead line.

It is far too dangerous to enter Wales and deposit it at Cardiff Crown Court , as procedure dictates, because I run the risk of yet another jail term. Last time I did a Derrick Hassan who supplied falsified forensic police evidence to have me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act , for Broadmoor, puched me down the court steps and broke my leg.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/files/folders/south_wales_police/entry1467.aspx

Keith Vaz MP takes up interest in South Wales' IPCC conduct over falsification of forensic evidence in Cardiff Crown Courts

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Machine-Gun.aspx

Photo of my leaving Cardiff Magistrates, in hand cuffs, by narked South Wales Police, on 1st December 2011, with no knowledge of any existance of a 'restraining order but beaten up by GEOamey Custodial Services just minutes before. all caught on video the judge, Mr Curran, refused to be made shown to the 4th May12 jury in Cardiff Crown Court.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Evil-Cardiff-Magistrates.aspx

Cardiff Cabal are so embarassed this incident, leading to my arrest, has been tranferred to Bristol Crown Court for trial, for fear of the publicity

Can anyone, please, cross the bridge to Cardiff and deliver it, with the court forms, on my behalf, before 4pm Friday, 1st June2012?

I am currently in Bristol and can deliver docs to anyone who can help.....thankyou

But I need help to improve the document as I cannot remember much of what was said during the numerous trials that have kept me locked up since most of the last eight months

tel 07907937953 maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

http://www.channel4.com/news/police-corruption-trial-collapses

His Honour Judge Patrick's Section 39 Order Restricts the publication of more details ...Re Musa trial

so be there!

I hope to be in London, until Friday, while I attend:

the Nigerian seven snatched children, by Haringey Council, a scandalous affair, at Wood Green Crown Court, while their parents remain in prison facing deportation..

http://kirkflyingvet.com/files/folders/south_wales_police/entry1450.aspx

DRAFT GROUNDS

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

(CRIMINAL DIVISION)

THE QUEEN

- v -

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

____________________________

GROUNDS OF APPEAL

______________________________

AGAINST CONVICTION

"REAL POSSIBILITY" OF ACTUAL AND/OR PERCEIVED PREJUDICE AND/OR BIAS OF HIS HONOUR JUDGE CURRAN

1. His Honour Judge Curran ought to have recused himself from presiding over the trial of the Appellant as he had previously stayed the Appellant's application to the Cardiff Administrative Court for Judicial Review of the Appellant's appeal at Cardiff Crown Court, Case A20110290, on 1^st March 2012 and his conviction and sentance of harassment, contrary to the Section 2 of Protection from Harassment Act 1997, at Cardiff Magistrates Court, on 1st December 2011, the subject of the Restraining Order allegedly breached in this present case.

2. Whilst accepting that the issues of fact in the trial were for the jury, His Honour Judge Curran made a number of rulings that erred in law similar if not identical to those by both District Judge John Charles, at Cardiff Magistrates and his Honour Judge PD Hughes QC, in its appeal, at Cardiff Crown Court.

3. Subsequently, failed disclosure of evidence, by way of court and custody documents and cctv footage, all under the control of the South Wales Police, caused the Appellant, in each of these court cases, compounded the reasons for refusal of access to his own legal papers in both court and prison and be given any facilities, at all, to either interview or call his own witnesses.

4. All prosecution witnesses, in the two previous above mentioned trials, were prevented from being cross examined by the Claimant while the main witness, a doctor, in the jury trial, subject to this appeal, was denied the Claimant's required examination or cross examination, contrary to His Honour Judge Curran QC's 22^nd February 2012 Court Order.

5. This was further compounded following, first by the failure to attend of the court instructed barrister, to cross examine the witness(es) ‘on the Appellant's behalf ', under Section 36 of Youth and Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 and following His Honour Judge Hugh Davies QC's April 2012 Court Order that caused this main prosecution witness to be removed from the witness list, as irrelevant and so facilitate the Appellant's immediate release from prison.

6. For the prosecution barrister, on 2^nd May 2012, to then open the prosecution's case by stating, before the jury and the trial judge, that the South Wales Police had ‘just decided' not to now call the doctor to give evidence, was nothing short of a criminal offence.

7. For the Appellant then not to be allowed to call this already empanelled prosecution witness, being ‘anybody's property', as his psychiatrist, expert witness and/or witness of fact and/or as his character witness, was a further abuse.

8. Before His Honour Judge Hugh Davies QC the prosecution had admitted it was only by the citing of this same witness, in all these three hearings, 2009 WW1Machine Gun trial and numerously related other summary hearings, by the South Wales Police, that the Crown Prosecution Service had been able to be successful, for the South Wales Police, to oppose the Appellant's preparation of both his civil and criminal cases, against the Chief Constable, out of custody, since 8am 22^nd June 2009.

9. By April 2012 the Appellant had almost served the pre arranged prison sentence of nine months, in any event, when bail would have been granted, by His Honour Judge Hugh Davies QC, had the Appellant been so stupidly minded as to apply.

10. There was a "real possibility" of actual and/or perceived bias, as a result of His Honour Judge Curran presiding over the Appellant's trial, when the learned Judge had already stayed the Appellant's application for permission to apply for Judicial Review of the dismissal of his appeal against conviction, on 2 March 2012, relating to the conviction in respect of which the Restraining Order, imposed by Cardiff Magistrates', which was alleged to have been now breached.

11. The certificate of conviction, at last released to the Appellant by HM Court and Tribunals Service, states the 1^st or 9^th December 2011 dated Restraining Order was dependent upon the conviction for a breach in Section 2 of the said Act but Prosecution Exhibit 1 indicates the ‘served order' on the Appellant was that from a Section 4 Restraining Order dated 8^th December 2011.

12. His Honour's failure to conduct a ‘Vue de Justice' with the jury, following the custody officers in the both courts, employed by GEOamey Custody Services Ltd, confiscation of the Appellant's scale drawings of the Cardiff magistrates custody suite, where the alleged offence took place was an abuse in law.

13. His Honour's failure to grant an adjournment for medical attention or even access to his medication in the cells below, following GEOamey Custody Services' vicious assaults upon the Appellant, both on 1^st December 2011 and 4^th April 2012, was an abuse of process.

14. His Honour's failure to allow the Appellant sight of all the prosecution exhibits, eg website blog of 4^th December 2011 on http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/, on arrest, before caution and/or during the trial and sight of various jury ‘notes', passed to His Honour, following the Appellant's suggestion, in the course of the trial, was also wrong in law.

15. His Honour's failure to ever allow the Appellant sight of the original or sight of a certified true copy, of the Restraining Order, allegedly served on him, was also wrong in law.

16. His Honour's failure to order HM Prison, Cardiff to release the Appellant's legal papers and posted in court exhibits by his Mackenzie Friend, allow him proper access to facilities, in order to conduct is defence did nothing but to compound his difficulties and were further breaches in his rights under the Rule of Law.

17. In the alternative, at the appropriate time, His Honour failed to properly consider granting bail, out of custody, in the light of these apparent extreme and unusual circumstances, unable to find local legal representation, as was indicated by His Honour Judge Hugh Davies QC, on 7^th April 2012, in Cardiff Crown Court and by His Honour Judge Lambert in Bristol Crown Court, during an apparent application for bail well outside South Wales.

18. The Appellant therefore had an unfair trial and/or the said trial took place in breach of article 6(1) of the ECHR as incorporated by schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

"REAL POSSIBILITY" OF ACTUAL AND/OR PERCEIVED PREJUDICE AND/OR BIAS OF MR DAVID GARETH EVANS OF COUNSEL PROSECUTING FOR THE SOUTH WALES POLICE

1. Mr. David Gareth Evans of counsel ought not to have prosecuted the case against the Appellant as he was a potential prosecution or defence witness relating to the drawing up and purported ‘service of a ‘Restraining Order' signed? by District Judge Charles at Cardiff Magistrates' Court on 1^st December 2011.

2. An approach by the Appellant's Mackenzie Friend caused the CPS barrister to produce another version of Prosecution Exhibit One, ‘Restraining Order', not date stamped by the court. Prosecution Exhibit One included the court date stamp 9^th Dec 2011.

3. The prosecution barrister admitted, before the jury, a ‘draught' Restraining Order did still exist and was ordered to produce it, by the following day, by His Honour Judge John Curran.

4. There was discussion, quite wrongly before the jury, as to whether Mr. Evans would be called as a witness relating to the ‘drawing up' of the ‘Restraining Order and he indicated to His Honour Judge Curran that he would have to "seek advice from his professional body the Bar Council for England and Wales".

5. The court heard no more so the Appellant called him as a defence witness and was refused.

6. The Appellant was refused an adjournment in the light of late prosecution disclosure of relevant evidence germane to the original 1^st December 2011 conviction, upon which the Restraining Order relied.

7. Further evidence to support, unavailable in the time frame available, was the ‘contemporaneous note' made by the Appellant's solicitor of his client's memory of events on the 1^st December 2011, on 22^nd December2011, just two days before the Appellant's arrest and subsequent incarceration.

8. HM Cardiff prison's governors denied the Appellant proper client/solicitor/witness access, his access to his own funds for the defence or provide proper service of his letters/faxes/e-mails and telephone calls, to and from his solicitor, helpers or proposed witnesses controlled by MAPPA.

9. An issue had therefore arisen in the case as to what documents were allegedly served on the Appellant relating to the Restraining Order and as to whether one had been served as handwritten by District Judge Charles as there had been evidence adduced before the jury by way of unsworn submissions by Mr. Evans and by sworn evidence from those in the public gallery, that the former had handed up a draft of the proposed Restraining Order to District Charles for approval and that District Charles had written comments on it in order stating he withed to make the Restraining Order stronger (change to a Section 4 Order, ‘fear of violence').

10. There was a "real possibility" of actual and/or perceived bias as a result of Mr. Evans prosecuting the case, when he had made oral submissions to His Honour Judge Curran which were in effect the giving of evidence which was unsworn and in respect of which the Appellant was unable to challenge by way of cross-examine.

11. In fact the Appellant had been absent in the cells at Cardiff Magistrates' Court when the issue of the ‘Restraining Order' had been discussed by Mr. Evans with District Judge Charles on 1^st December 2011.

12. In addition, the relevant exchanges between Mr. Evans as prosecutor and His Honour Judge Curran were heard in the presence of the jury when they should have been ordered to retire, causing prejudice and bias in the Appellant's case.

The jury specifically asked for sight of the original, not copy, of both the GEOamey Custodial Services custody and clerk of the court's log and contemporaneous notes of evidence but the judge indicated, in the absence of the Appellant, that they were not relevant.

14 The Appellant therefore had an unfair trial and/or the said trial took place in breach of article 6(1) of the ECHR as incorporated by schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

LACK OF DISCLOSURE IN RESPECT OF THE APPELLANT

1. The prosecution failed to supply to the Appellant the complete log with handwritten notes and annotations of the custody records and cctv footage, kept by GEOamey Custodial Services, that had been in charge of security in the cells at Cardiff Magistrates' Court and also the notes made by Mr. Michael Williams, the Clerk of the Court and others at Cardiff Magistrates' Court.

2. Further, it emerged on 3 May 2012, during the trial that Mr. Evans was appearing in for the prosecution, he had handed up a draft of the ‘Restraining Order' to District Judge Charles on 1^st December 2011 and the learned District Judge had made handwritten additions to it with suggestions for making it stronger to be one under Section 4 of the Act.

3. There was an issue in the trial as to exactly which version of the ‘Restraining Order' had actually been served on the Appellant in the cells by the Security Officer Mr. Leigh Barker and so the existence of the copy of the ‘Restraining Order' with the handwritten additions made by District Judge Charles became an issue as the Appellant wished the jury to see it.

4. At the conclusion of the proceedings, on 3 May 2012, His Honour Judge Curran enquired as to the whereabouts of the version of the Restraining Order with the handwritten additional made by District Judge Charles and was told by Mr. Evans that it was at the CPS Headquarters in the Appellant's case file at Merthyr Tydfil.

5. Although His Honour Judge Curran directed that it be produced at the resumption of the proceedings, on 4 May 2012, only a computer print out of the amended restraining Order was produced and the jury was deprived of seeing either the original version with the handwritten additions, made by District Judge Charles or a certified true copy of the original 1^st December 2011 Restraining Order made on some date between 1^st and 9^th December 2011.

6. The Appellant had also again sought disclosure of the notes made by Mr. Michael Williams, the Clerk of the Court at Cardiff Magistrates' Court at the commencement of the proceedings, on 4 May 2012 but no order or any determination was made by His Honour Judge Curran for their production, instead, in the absence of the Appellant, informing the jury they, along with the prison and GEOmey Custodial Services records were not relevant.

7. Prior to trial His Honour knew the Appellant had received correspondence from Cardiff Magistrates stating he was not entitled to any court record other than the certificate of conviction for this and some currently seven ongoing summary cases, different but all related to this current appeal.

8. The Appellant therefore had an unfair trial and/or the said trial took place in breach of article 6(1) of the ECHR as incorporated by schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

CASE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WITHDRAWN FROM CONSIDERATION BY THE JURY

1. Although the Appellant didn't make any submissions of ‘no case to answer', after the close of the prosecution's case, His Honour Judge Curran should have withdrawn the case from the jury on the grounds that the evidence as it then stood, relating to the alleged service of the Restraining Order on the Appellant in the cell number three of Cardiff Magistrates' Court, on 1^st December 2011, was so unreliable that no jury properly directed could convict on that evidence.

2. Conflicting evidence had been given between the Clerk of the Court, Mr. Michael Williams and the Security Officer, Mr. Leigh Barker as to whether the Appellant had been serviced in one of the cells or in the corridor of the cell area below the Magistrates, whether he had been served with one or two separate documents, if at all and when put alongside their original but conflicting police witness statements, it is the Appellant's submission, that for this case to have even reached a jury was an abuse of process fueled by vengeance.

3. In addition, Mr. Barker had given evidence that he had read "Restraining Order" at the top of the document, that he had stated in evidence he had given to the Appellant but didn't give any evidence that the Appellant's name was on the document or that he had read the Appellant's name on the document in question.

4. There was a serious risk of doubt regarding the alleged service of the ‘Restraining Order' on the Appellant in the cell area of Cardiff Magistrates' Court by Mr. Barker on the Appellant.

5. In the premises, the Appellant's conviction is thereby rendered "unsafe" under section 2(1)(a) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

(CRIMINAL DIVISION)

THE QUEEN

- v -

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

_____________________________________________

GROUNDS OF APPEAL

_____________________________________________

49 Tynewydd Road, (for sale, 'cheap, cheap')

Barry,

CF62 8AZ