Legal Battles : MAPPA, Michelle Collins http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/tags/MAPPA/Michelle+Collins/default.aspxTags: MAPPA, Michelle CollinsenCommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)POLICE APPLICATION for POLICE CUSTODY VIDEOS TO BE BLOCKED from His Honour Judge Seys Lewellin QC on 3rd Aprilhttp://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/03/31/dear-ignorant-tax-payer.aspxSun, 31 Mar 2013 09:29:00 GMTc7306cf9-8c9b-4f2c-8f21-f8b2637dc339:2892Maurice Kirk3http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2892http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/03/31/dear-ignorant-tax-payer.aspx#comments<p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><strong><font size="3">Witnesses for Week 4 Cardiff Civil Justice Centre 3rd April 13 10.30</font></strong></span></p> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><strong><font size="4">STOP PRESS</font></strong></span></p> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><strong><font size="4">Queens Council for the Chief Constable of the South Wales Police will apply on Wednesday, 3rd April, to block this video from being shown to the trial judge, His Honour Judge Seys Lewellin QC, EXACTLY as they succeeded in doing at  my original 2000 magistrates, 2001 appeal and three JR applications after these same police, an Inspector Collins reported the driving conviction that the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons relied upon to have my name removed from the veterinary register , effectively , for life!</font></strong></span></p> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=4">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=4</a></span></p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"> <div class="aju"> <div class="aCi"> <div style="DISPLAY:none;" class="aFg"></div><img id=":0_9-e" class="ajn" src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/profile_mask2.png" alt="" /></div></div> <div class="gs"> <div class="gE iv gt"> <table class="cf gJ" cellpadding="0" class="cf gJ"> <tr class="acZ"> <td class="gF gK" class="gF gK"> <table class="cf ix" cellpadding="0" class="cf ix"> <tr> <td> <div class="iw"><span class="gD">Adrian Oliver.</span> </div></td></tr></table></td> <td class="gH" class="gH"> <div class="gK"><span></span><span id=":3p" class="g3">15:11 (1 hour ago)</span> <div style="OUTLINE-STYLE:none;OUTLINE-COLOR:invert;OUTLINE-WIDTH:0px;" class="zd"><span class="T-KT"><img class="f T-KT-JX" alt="" src="http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif" /></span></div></div></td> <td class="gH" class="gH"></td> <td class="gH acX" rowspan="2" class="gH acX"> <div class="T-I J-J5-Ji T-I-Js-IF aaq T-I-ax7 L3"><img class="hB T-I-J3" alt="" src="http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif" /></div> <div id=":3b" class="T-I J-J5-Ji T-I-Js-Gs aap T-I-awG T-I-ax7 L3"><img class="hA T-I-J3" alt="" src="http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif" /></div></td></tr> <tr class="acZ xD"> <td colspan="3"></td></tr></table></div> <div class="utdU2e"></div> <div class="tx78Ic"></div> <div class="aHl"></div> <div id=":3d"></div> <div id=":3r" class="ii gt adP adO"> <div id=":6z"> <div class="adM"></div> <div> <div class="adM"></div> <div> <div class="adM"></div> <p class="MsoNormal">Dear Mr Kirk, <u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal">I refer to your further attendance at our offices on Thursday 28 March 2013, when you again sought to ignore the fact that we have withdrawn your licence to attend at our offices. I am given to understand that you caused disruption and inconvenience to other users of the building which we occupy and that the security staff at the building considered it necessary to communicate with the police in this regard. I would again urge you to deal with any necessary matters in compliance with the court orders which have been made in this matter. <u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal">I would also wish to record that you were not prepared to identify the basis of your attendance with the staff who sought to speak with you.<u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal">I refer to your telephone contact with Dolmans at 1.30 pm on 2 April 2013. I would again remind you of my prior request that you deal with matters by email due to your propensity to distort comments made in telephone discussion. You have been able to communicate by email and indeed, have sought to encourage the same. I record that it is only during the course of the adjournment of your civil trial that you have sought again to attend our premises and to communicate by telephone, even though you have been prepared to communicate previously by email. I would again ask you to revert to dealing with matters through this medium as it enables both parties to prepare for matters arising in the trial.<u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal">You have left a message at 1.30 pm asking for details of the witnesses who are to be called tomorrow (3 April 2013) for trial. You can be advised that it is the intention of Leading Counsel to invite former police officer Robert Osbourne to provide evidence at court on 3 April 2013. <u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal">I can also advise you however that Mr Lloyd Williams QC intends to address the court before any further evidence has been provided as to your failure to deal with the disclosure of any videos / digital footage which you might have in your possession. <u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal">I trust this email will provide you with sufficient notice to prepare for these matters.<u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal">Yours sincerely, <u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:'Arial','sans-serif';FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><u></u><u></u></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="FONT-FAMILY:'Arial','sans-serif';FONT-SIZE:10pt;">Adrian P. Oliver</span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="FONT-FAMILY:'Arial','sans-serif';FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span></b><span style="FONT-FAMILY:'Arial','sans-serif';COLOR:blue;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">Senior Partner<u></u><u></u></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:'Arial','sans-serif';COLOR:blue;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">Dolmans Solicitors<u></u><u></u></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/SWP%20Schedule%20Defendant%20witnesses%204th%20week.pdf">SWP Schedule Defendant witnesses 4th week.pdf</a></span></p></div></div></div></div></div> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/SWP%20Witness%20Statement%20of%20Maurice%20John%20Kirk%20final.pdf">SWP Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirk final.pdf</a></span></p> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><strong></strong></span> </p> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><strong>Dear Poorly Informed Tax Payer,</strong></span></p> <p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">.</span></b></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span></b><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"> </span><strong><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">GUERNSEY,</span></strong><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"> Channel Islands, is where I set up a ‘legal aid’ charity and first learnt to 'cut my teeth' on the current subject now unfolding at last, after twenty years, in <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">Cardiff's Civil Justice Centre</b>.</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"> </span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">It is <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">HM Partnership's</b> <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;">'cosy relationship'</i> as <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">Lord George Foulkes</b> once put it, the ‘<i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;">incestuous relationship’</i> between both executive and judiciary, all protected within it by <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">'Royal Charters'.</b></span> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">.</b></span></p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"></b></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"> </span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">.</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon's immunity to prosecution<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"> </b>is the classic example when still refusing to ‘convene a court’, contrary to statute, simply to consider my numerous applications, over the last nine years, for my name to be returned to the veterinary register. [See the past twelve years of ‘Down Loads’ and other ‘Blogs’ on this website].</span> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">.</span></p> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">Here, in 'Old South Wales', as dentist John Wilson in 'New South Wales' will quickly concur, <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">'Her Majesty's Prerogative'</b> continues to allow rampant nefarious conduct in our UK law courts to flourish, compounded by outdated 'adversarial systems' once based on trust.</span> </p> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">.</span></p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"> </span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">Take the ‘<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">Musa Family Case’, </b>as another typical example,<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"> </b>currently on appeal, <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;">‘</i></b><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;">we think’<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">,</b></i> where Haringey Council lawyers ‘cashed in’ on the act, again all immune to any HM regulatory retribution or HM prosecution in either our civil or criminal courts. </span> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">.</span></p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"> </span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">[The Nigerian couple are currently serving seven years imprisonment with all seven of their children now snatched and outrageously ‘re homed’ instead of just being put on the next flight to Nigeria].</span></b> <p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">.</span></b></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span></b><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">The paranoia surrounding this tragic case was further revealed in the way I was jailed for ‘attempting’ to fly the kids home in my two seat WW2 Piper Cub and then being prosecuted, in my absence, as Cardiff’s judiciary would not even ‘produce’ me from similarly outdated prison system!</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"> </span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">.</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">This old ‘<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">Out of Court’</b> video, below, has been held back until now to be a stark warning of things yet to come both in England and Wales, if not already here. </span> <p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span></p><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"> </span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Arial;FONT-SIZE:10pt;">Does it stink or does it stink?</span> <p>  EXPOSURE VIDEO of GUERNSEY,  as an IRA safe house, drug dealer's dream, insider dealer's paradise and where the incestuous island's De Vic Cary's grand father collaborated, as Bailiff, with the Germans, enough for Churchill intending to have him hanged, was the same little b+stard who jailed me 21 times, anything to prevent education on 'basic human rights' to be intoduced to a two teir structure his masonic mates and the serfs.  </p> <p><a title="http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM" href="http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM" target="_blank"><font color="#efbc97">http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM</font></a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx">http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx</a></p> <p>.</p> <p><strong><font size="4">While in Wales,</font></strong></p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y</a></p> <p><strong><font size="3">We still have a Dr Tegwyn Williams 'at large', on 'long term sick with his wife,' on my account, despite falsifying yet further 'victim' statements </font></strong></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/11%2011%2015%20Solicitor%20letter%20to%20Cardiff%20Magistrates.pdf">11 11 15 Solicitor letter to Cardiff Magistrates.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/12%2008%2020%20MJK%20MG11%20Redacted%20shr.pdf">12 08 20 MJK MG11 Redacted shr.pdf</a></p> <p>Much more about NHS (Wales) multi million  conspiracy, later.</p> <p><strong><font size="3">In Cardiff County Court this Month</font></strong></p> <p>Lantwit Major's police sergeant  Kilberg, one of many in the 1990s police force, who had my name removed from the veterinary register is caught out lying to the currently presiding judgere along with a few others already heard and shortly to also give evidence.</p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;"><font face="Times New Roman">Enclosed is a 90s Barry police station custody video of Kilberg lying to the custody sergeant that I was in breach of a public order offence despite the custody sergeant specifically asking for that clarification. </font></span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;">His Honour Judge Seys Llewellin QC or the police QC, during the three months civil action currently in session in the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, asked for clarification on exactly the same point with the South Wales Police sergeant qualifying the issue by stating the custody sergeant made the mistake when writing down the facts.</span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;">The truth of the matter was his partner, PC Gareth Holmes was right there, seen on video and refusing to support the deliberate lie either by recording it in his pocket note book or in his subsequent MG 11 witness statement.</span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;"><strong><em><font size="5">Llantwit Major's Police Sergeant Kilberg Video to follow</font></em></strong></span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;"><a title="http://youtu.be/eBkNCYYfJOE" href="http://youtu.be/eBkNCYYfJOE" target="_blank">http://youtu.be/eBkNCYYfJOE</a></span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;"></span> </p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;">Meanwhile a letter of more importance, if <em> 'testicles on a plate without an anaesthetic'</em> is to be avoided, to the only others in Wales, apparently, responsible for maintaining law and order throughout The Principality........</span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;"><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/13%2003%2031%20to%20CPS%20NHS.doc">13 03 31 to CPS NHS.doc</a></span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;">AND this latest thoroughly insulting bit of nonsense from Cardiff's magistrates, court concerning the police refusing to return some £10,000 worth of antique guns and a walking stick confiscated in 2009/10 while desperate to get me a 10 year mandatory prison sentace for 'trading in prohibited weapons '!</span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;"> Such as the WW1 Lewis machine gun, the most effective such weapon in the war and was bolted to my, now sold, replica DH2 RFC biplane fighter, an aircraft, like the September 1940 Hurricane, that turned the tables in 1916, just at such acute points in two world wars.....b*stards </span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;"><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/13%2003%2028%20Shot%20Guns%20and%20Muskets%20MagistratesCase%20Stated%20Response.pdf">13 03 28 Shot Guns and Muskets MagistratesCase Stated Response.pdf</a></span></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/20120615_113703.jpg"><img style="WIDTH:3128px;HEIGHT:2339px;" border="0" src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/20120615_113703.jpg" width="3220" height="2409" alt="" /></a></p> <p><strong><font size="5">ARE WE DEALING WITH EVIL HERE?</font></strong></p> <p><strong><font size="5">Masonic Devil Worship?</font></strong></p> <p>Dolmans, Cardiff solicitors, </p> <p>You either settle or or I publish ex Chief Inspector' Jenner and ex Ely police station's Inspector Roe's recorded evidence denying , as did the b*tch of bitches, Barbara Wilding, by sworn affidavit, denying the knowledge of  court cases and her ordering the use of a sledge hammer and a crow bar to break into my Cardiff veterinary surgery just to put back Jenner's daughter, Alison, effectively putting trouble and druggies back into my overhead flat .</p> <p>Your client also had me put in Cardiif prison, for four days, pretending you vermin could not 'recognise' me!</p> <p>Your client had the machine gun painted a different colour to try and fool a Cardiff jury</p> <p>Your client had me up for speeding when in possession of the photograph of the true driver, his name adress and when I arrested CPS lawyer Stoffa the police ran a mile , in the wrong direction</p> <p>Your client repeatedly had me arrested on the road side following a purported positive breath test only for there to be a zero reading within 20 minutes on the police stations' ' definitive test' machine.......any filthy trick to aggrevate and proke a victim.</p> <p>Do I appear drunk in this Bridgend police custody video? This was immediately after 10pm arrest at Pencoed but almost negative reading on the station definitive machine (a lager or two at lunch time). The arrest was for for 'dangerous driving', that the south Wales Police lost, before a jury, after the judge had to stop the Cardiff trial for jury complaining the police were signalling to their mates onwhilst under my cross examination.</p> <p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzSPSX-hVEE">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzSPSX-hVEE</a>.</p> <p>Your client, in 'Operation Orchid' tried to snatch our then ten year old child, using social services, bullying my then wife to signed a pre prepared witness statement that I was insane.......you evil bunch of lawyers conspired  with NHS' Morgan Cole, solicitors to use Dr williams to have me arrested by armed police helicopter but failing to get a conviction or steel our daughter but instigated immediate divorce proceedings ....the thought of spineless tactics I should of expected</p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JdcyhiC3e0&list=PL0A52598AD5E0C099">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JdcyhiC3e0&list=PL0A52598AD5E0C099</a> </p> <p>As lawyers you advised Barbara Wilding to have me registered MAPPA level 3 </p> <p>Your client, with your advise, then had Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams of Caswell clinic, to have me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act without a shred of evidence and without even examining his patient, for one purpose.....to delay this three month trial ever coming to court!</p> <p>Oh, yes and what is the latest? Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams falsifies another police victim statement, in july last year, having me locked up for weeks in prison until the CPS then get involved to prepare for another rigged Cardiff judiciary jury trial. </p> <p>And what did the CPS find? Dr Williams' circa 21st July 13 'victim' statement record? I had been around to his home and had harassed both he and his wife, Dr Janis Hillier causing the police to 'move me on'...utter bollocks,,,I do not even know or wish to know, other than to arrange a private prosecution 'procedure'as to where the fat over paid 'toad' lives. </p> <p>Oh yes, I almost forgot....four times I have been to the police stations to complain and written long statements but your client, you advise them, ignore him , he will not live much longer.</p> <p>Two sets of lawyers, one from England and one from Cardiff, have asked both the police and the CPS for a copy of that July 13 victim statement but they both reply....."it cannot be found" </p> <p>Just for starters...... and we now move into two months of more fun or is it Romans chapter 12, verse19, is it?</p> <p>Why is your client continuing to ignore the seriousnes of Christopher Alexander's (alias Ebbs). statement of yet anopther south wales Police conspiracy?....Worried it might be true? But you lot can continue to steal another  huge chunk of tax payers' hard earned cash if you 'string it along' just like my seven or so listed Actions against your client. Remember, police officer Rice told the court he had no knowledge of Ebbs/Alexander or recognise him standing at the back of the court.</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/12%2010%2026%20Ebbs%20Staterment.pdf">12 10 26 Ebbs Staterment.pdf</a></p> <p>Your clients' collusion with Cardiff masonic devil worshiping judges had my web site closed down, last time, when we got a little too close to the truth about your disgusting money making regime but try it again and the articles will spring up on 10 other already primed web sites positioned abroad</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/Judges%20sensorship%20.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/Judges%20sensorship%20.jpg" alt="" /></a></p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0gQc1mveKg">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0gQc1mveKg</a></p> <p>Your client ran to the protection of Judge Nicholarse Cooke QC and got it following His Honour's receipt of the following 'jury note' of a flagrant conspiracy by the South Wales Police caught red handed' by the jury!!! That aborted 'dangerous driving' case must be heard also in the next few days, I presume?</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/01%2002%2001%20Cardiff%20Crown%20Jury%20Note%20Dangerous%20driving.png"><img border="0" src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/01%2002%2001%20Cardiff%20Crown%20Jury%20Note%20Dangerous%20driving.png" alt="" /></a> </p> <p> <a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/Contempt%20of%20Court%20Appeal%20NHS%20Fraud.png"><img border="0" src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/Contempt%20of%20Court%20Appeal%20NHS%20Fraud.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p> <strong><font size="5">Punitive Damages</font></strong></p> <p>Punitive Damages<font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;">In<a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England England" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England" target="_blank">England</a>and <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wales Wales" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wales" target="_blank">Wales</a>, exemplary damages are limited to the circumstances set out by <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Devlin Lord Devlin" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Devlin" target="_blank">Lord Devlin</a> in the leading case of <i><span style="FONT-STYLE:italic;"><a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rookes_v_Barnard Rookes v Barnard" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rookes_v_Barnard" target="_blank">Rookes v Barnard</a></span></i>:<sup><a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punitive_damages#cite_note-6#cite_note-6" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punitive_damages#cite_note-6%23cite_note-6" target="_blank"><img src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/emoticons/emotion-14.gif" alt="Devil" /></a></sup><u></u><u></u></span></font></p> <ol> <li class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;">Oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional actions by the servants of government.</span><span> </span></font><span><u></u><u></u></span></li> <li class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;">Where the defendant's conduct was 'calculated' to make a profit for himself.</span><span> </span></font><span><u></u><u></u></span></li> <li class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;">Where a statute expressly authorises the same.</span><span> </span></font><span><u></u><u></u></span></li></ol> <p><i><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-STYLE:italic;FONT-SIZE:12pt;">Rookes v Barnard</span></font></i><span> has been much criticised and has not been followed in <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada Canada" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada" target="_blank">Canada</a> or <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia Australia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia" target="_blank">Australia</a>or by the <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privy_Council Privy Council" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privy_Council" target="_blank">Privy Council</a>.<sup><a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punitive_damages#cite_note-7#cite_note-7" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punitive_damages#cite_note-7%23cite_note-7" target="_blank">[7]</a></sup><u></u><u></u></span></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;">Another case that could arguably be seen as an example of punitive <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damages Damages" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damages" target="_blank">damages</a>was that of <i><span style="FONT-STYLE:italic;">Attorney-General v Blake</span></i><sup><a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punitive_damages#cite_note-8#cite_note-8" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punitive_damages#cite_note-8%23cite_note-8" target="_blank"><img src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/emoticons/emotion-29.gif" alt="Music" /></a></sup>in which the defendant profited from publishing a book detailing his work for <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI5 MI5" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI5" target="_blank">MI5</a>. The details were very old and therefore did not cause loss to the state. The publishing was, however, in <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_contract Breach of contract" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_contract" target="_blank">breach of the contract</a> of employment (and incidentally <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_law Criminal law" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_law" target="_blank">criminally</a>in breach of the <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_Secrets_Act_1911 Official Secrets Act 1911" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_Secrets_Act_1911" target="_blank">Official Secrets Act 1911</a>). The defendant was required to give an account of his profits gained from writing the book.<u></u><u></u></span></font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;">The<a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court Court" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court" target="_blank">courts</a> have been very reluctant to follow this approach,<sup><a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punitive_damages#cite_note-9#cite_note-9" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punitive_damages#cite_note-9%23cite_note-9" target="_blank">[9]</a></sup>emphasising the materiality of the <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_law Criminal law" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_law" target="_blank">criminal</a>element required for these <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damages Damages" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damages" target="_blank">damages</a>to be considered.<u></u><u></u></span></font></p> <p style="LINE-HEIGHT:18.6pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#2e3338" size="2" face="Courier"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Courier;FONT-SIZE:9.5pt;">2) aggravated damages<u></u><u></u></span></font></p> <p style="LINE-HEIGHT:18.6pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#2e3338" size="2" face="Courier"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:Courier;FONT-SIZE:9.5pt;">"Aggravated damages are compensatory in nature, while <a href="http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/P/PunitiveDamages.aspx" target="_blank">punitive damages</a> are awarded as punishment for egregious conduct....<u></u><u></u></span></font></p><img src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2892" width="1" height="1">Royal College of Veterinary SurgeonsfreemasonsHM ImmunitySouth Wales PoliceMAPPACardiff County CourtProfessor Roger WoodDr Tegwyn WilliamsIPCCUKColumnGMCAbuse of ProcessNHS WALESHaringey CouncilMusa familyMichelle Collinschild snatchingharingey policeSouth Wales Police cover-upSouth Wales Police cover-up GuernseyRCVS Lord Leveson Mr Justices Mitting & Males REFUSE Maurice's Applic for NHS (Wales) Falsified MAPPA Psychiatric Reports to be CORRECTED OR CLARIFIEDhttp://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/03/10/lord-leveson-to-hear-maurice-s-application-at-the-criminal-court-of-appeal-sitting-at-cardiff-crown-court.aspxSun, 10 Mar 2013 08:56:00 GMTc7306cf9-8c9b-4f2c-8f21-f8b2637dc339:2863Maurice Kirk7http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2863http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/03/10/lord-leveson-to-hear-maurice-s-application-at-the-criminal-court-of-appeal-sitting-at-cardiff-crown-court.aspx#comments<p><font size="4"><span class="hp"><font size="3"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:'Arial','sans-serif';">JUDGMENT</span></font></span></font></p> <p><font size="4"><span class="hp"><font size="3"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:'Arial','sans-serif';"><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/13%2003%2014%20Cr%20Crt%20App%20Refusal.png"><img border="0" src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/13%2003%2014%20Cr%20Crt%20App%20Refusal.png" alt="" /></a></span></font></span></font></p> <p><font size="4"><span class="hp"><font size="3"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:'Arial','sans-serif';">14th March 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal, whilst sitting in Cardiff, refused Maurice Kirk both legal representation and clarification​ion as to whether he had 'significant​ brain damage’ and 'possible' cancer reported to 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, by a South Wales police psychiatrist, whilst recommending his victim be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Prison for the doctor’s own safety, from an interested third party, an elderly Norman Scarth Esq</span><font face="Calibri">.</font></font></span></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;mso-no-proof:yes;"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"></font></font><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"></font></font></span></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p><font size="4"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></font></p><font size="4"> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;mso-no-proof:yes;"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"></font></font><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"></font></font></span></p> <p><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3"></font></font></p><font face="Times New Roman"> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;mso-no-proof:yes;"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"></font></font><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"></font></font></span></p> <p><font size="3"></font></p></font> <p><strong>That makes 14 UK judges, now, protecting NHS (Wales) and South Wales Police policy and damned the danger to the general public, to allow servicer of the 'Gulag card' on anyone who dares threaten their</strong></p></font> <p><strong><font size="4">pensions </font></strong></p> <p><a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2013-03-14a.147843.h&s=speaker%3A11420#g147843.q0">http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2013-03-14a.147843.h&s=speaker%3A11420#g147843.q0</a></p> <p><strong><font size="4"><u>  Maurice's very simple submission, today, stating, at the out set he only wanted his psychiatric reports corrected or clarified.</u></font></strong></p> <p><strong><font size="4"><u>They had already had the refusal drafted months ago</u></font></strong></p> <p><strong><font size="4"><u>Maurice asked for an ajournment for legal representation but was refused.</u></font></strong></p> <p><strong><font size="4"><u>Maurice asked it be adjourned owing to a JR application was outstanding about the circus of District Judge John Charles circus on 1st December 2011....Maurice was refused </u></font></strong></p> <p><strong><font size="4"><u>Their Lordships already had this document from me, knocked up at 6am on the day, served on them for Cyberr space world wide ECHR and CCRC</u></font></strong></p> <p><strong><u><font size="4"></font></u></strong> </p> <p><strong><font size="4">Please note today's court judgment is a stark warning to others in Wales of what has been going on re the practice of false psychiatric reports understood by no one, not even the writer.</font></strong></p> <p><strong><font size="4">This judgment means trouble  </font></strong></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;"><font face="Calibri">Criminal Court of Appeal<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">                                                                                          </span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">   </span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span>ref: <b>201203241 D2 </b></font></span> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;"><font face="Calibri">At Cardiff Crown Court<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">                                                                 </span>ref: CO/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012 </font></span> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;"><font face="Calibri"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">                                                                                                                                                  </span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">     </span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span>1CF 03546</font></span> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="FONT-SIZE:16pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="FONT-SIZE:16pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">Regina v Maurice John Kirk</font></span></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Application to Appeal</font></font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><u><span style="TEXT-DECORATION:none;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></u></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><u><span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">SUMMARY</font></span></u></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">The trial was unsafe because:</font></font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;" class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">The jury was denied the defence evidence</font></font></b></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Extract taken from 4</font><font size="2"><sup>th</sup></font><font size="3"> May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court hearing at approx. 10.45am</font></font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">JUDGE CURRAN:<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">    </span>Do you intend give evidence?</font></font></i> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></i> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">MR KIRK:<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">   </span>It depends on whether you let me get my legal papers that are down stairs.</font></font></i> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></i> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">JUDGE CURRAN:<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">   </span>Mr Kirk, I am not going to let you get at what you call your legal papers.</font></font></i> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></i> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">(The Appellant was not allowed to be present or allowed to call any defence witnesses)</font></font></i> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></i></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font></i></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="2"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;" class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The jury was misdirected</font></b></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"></span><br /><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Jury note(s) to the learned judge they received a response, in the forced absence of the Appellant, that there was ‘no evidence’ from both the custody manager and court clerk’s contemporaneous notes and CCTV footage stored from GEOamey Custody Services cameras positioned both in the Appellant’s cell and in the long custody suite corridor or from the HM court’s controlled cameras at both exit of the custody suite and building.</font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">. </font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">LEE BARKER, the custody suite manager said, both on oath and in his witness statement, that he ‘served’ the ‘restraining order’ in the cell after he had to first unlocked the cell door.</font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">MICHAEL WILLIAMS said, both on oath and in his witness statement, that he saw served on the Appellant the ‘restraining order’ whilst the Appellant was on crutches in the corridor returning from the toilets. Potential weapons, such as crutches, are not allowed in that area.</font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">CCTV cameras recorded the part hand written<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">  </span>‘restraining order’ remained in BARKER’S hand , whilst in the cell and recorded the Appellant literately being dragged out and thrown out of the suite by no less than five angry custody officers who then threw his crutches onto his head as he lay on the floor of the public corridor. The camera at the exit of the building recorded defence witnesses, called to give evidence, seeing the Appellant both in hand cuffs and in a wheel chair.</font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="3"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;" class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">The jury was subjected to a ‘An Abuse of Process’</font></font></b></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The psychiatrist subjected the Appellant to the NHS (Wales) zero tolerance policy thereby seriously prejudicing current civil litigation from 20 years of persistent police bullying by</font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">a)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">      </span></span><font size="3">Causing the Appellant to be registered, in Barry police station, on 8</font><font size="2"><sup>th</sup></font><font size="3"> June 2009, a MAPPA level 3 victim, to be one of the 5% most dangerous so registered and then</font></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3"></font></span></font> </p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">b)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">      </span></span><font size="3">On the 22</font><font size="2"><sup>nd</sup></font><font size="3"> June 2009 caused the Appellant to be arrested and remanded in custody on dreamed up fire arms charges over a WWI antique Lewis machine gun and then</font></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">c)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">      </span></span><font size="3">had <span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span>the Appellant, on 7</font><font size="2"><sup>th</sup></font><font size="3"> august 2009, sectioned <span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span>under the 1983 Mental Health Act, without even examining his own patient and then</font></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">d)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">      </span></span><font size="3">without the appropriate qualifications and contrary to others with appropriate qualifications, recommended to a Crown Court, on 2</font><font size="2"><sup>nd</sup></font><font size="3"> December 2009, that<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">  </span>the Appellant be further incarcerated into Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison for the doctor’s own safety (see para39 of 19</font><font size="2"><sup>th</sup></font><font size="3"> October 2009 psychiatric report) and then</font></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">e)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">      </span></span><font size="3">The psychiatrist wrote that the Appellant had ‘significant brain damage’ with the court being told, in the forced absence of the Appellant, that he possibly had cancer’</font></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">f)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">     </span></span><font size="3">The Appellant has NEVER been supplied with the evidence, clarification or retraction of such nonsense despite this Appellant’s last application before this very same Criminal Court of Appeal for that very same purpose</font></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">g)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">      </span></span><font size="3">The mischief by Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams continues</font></font></p> <p style="TEXT-INDENT:-18pt;MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2;" class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Last July he signed a ‘victim’ statement that the Appellant had harassed him at his home with his wife, Dr Janis Hillier, also of Caswell Clinic, to such an extent that they are now both on ‘extended sick leave’. The lies continued in that he also stated police had to be called to the scene but with Appellant’s subsequent imprisonment ending by all charges being dropped.</font></p> <p style="TEXT-INDENT:-18pt;MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2;" class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"></span></font></font></b> </p> <p style="TEXT-INDENT:-18pt;MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2;" class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"></span></font></font></b> </p> <p style="TEXT-INDENT:-18pt;MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2;" class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">  </span>4 <span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span>Section 1 (3) of 1997 Harassment Act provides a Defence</font></font></b><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">The Appellant was not allowed at the1</font><font size="2"><sup>st</sup></font><font size="3"> December 2010 summary hearing, while facing ‘harassment’ allegations of the police doctor, at its subsequent 1</font><font size="2"><sup>st</sup></font><font size="3"> March 2013 appeal or even at the 4</font><font size="2"><sup>th</sup></font><font size="3"> May 2013 jury trial to put a legal argument that the police doctor had knowingly committed crime, due to police black mail and therefore the Appellant was permitted </font></font></p> <p style="TEXT-INDENT:-18pt;MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2;" class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><font face="Times New Roman"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">a)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">      </span></span></b><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3">that it was pursued for the purposes of preventing or detecting crime</font></b></font></p> <p style="TEXT-INDENT:-18pt;MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2;" class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><font face="Times New Roman"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">b)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">      </span></span></b><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3">that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment</font></b></font></p> <p style="TEXT-INDENT:-18pt;MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2;" class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><font face="Times New Roman"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><span style="mso-list:Ignore;"><font size="3">c)</font><span style="FONT:7pt 'Times New Roman';font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;">      </span></span></b><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3">that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable</font></b></font></p> <p style="TEXT-INDENT:-18pt;MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2;" class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><font face="Times New Roman"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"></font></b></font> </p> <p style="TEXT-INDENT:-18pt;MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 36pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2;" class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Maurice J Kirk BVSc<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">       </span>14</font><font size="2"><sup>th</sup></font><font size="3"> March 2013</font></font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font><strong><font size="4"></font></strong> </p> <p><strong><font size="4">SO WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?</font></strong></p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4G0vYqzTc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4G0vYqzTc</a></p> <p><strong><font size="4">At my age the evilness from UK courts' cartel is but small beer.</font></strong></p> <p><strong><font size="4">I broadcast a taste of last time I was in front of Their Lordships, in the Royal Courts of Justice, on another futile  appeal, having served yet another prison sentance caused by Dr Tegwyn Williams, re a Cardiff judge daring to suggest, ney insult my intellegence, that he would order and obtain, bloody liar, for the NHS (Wales) to produce the evidence I was to be sent to Ashworth ipp as a public hazard.</font></strong></p> <p><strong><font size="4"> Who filmed this, quite without my knowing and definitely without my approval , I do not know but had I known I would not of been so subservient......and the rest.</font></strong></p> <p>Dr Tewgwyn Wlliams black mailed by police to recommend to His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC that I be incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison 'for his own safety'!..... see paragraph 39</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/4th%20Williams%20Psych%20Reprt%2019%2010%209.pdf">4th Williams Psych Reprt 19 10 9.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/9%2012%201%20medical%20Kemp.pdf">9 12 1 medical Kemp.pdf</a></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="4">Dr Tegwyn Williams' wrong doing?</font></b></font></font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The Appellant believes Dr Tegwyn Williams is an unaccountable Clinical Director who can call on NHS lawyers and NHS chiefs to cover up his wrongdoing. It is in papers, that were not before the Courts in this case, that Dr Tegwyn Williams is that unaccountable that he calls on the support of the Chief of local NHS and Welsh NHS to use police to stop complaints about him going to the General Medical Council </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="2"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Dr TW to help his associates (some local police) in a civil dispute, Sectioned the Appellant, without first assessing him, when the Appellant was not a patient of those kinds of services. </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="3"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Dr TW then entirely made up that the Appellant had significant irreversible brain damage and made application to indefinitely Section the appellant to High Security Hospital. He failed in his attempted to indefinitely Section as no other medical doctor would support him. </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="4"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The point is that Dr Tegwyn Williams is not medically qualified to interpret brain scans, as that is the job of the neuro-radiologist who has training and qualifications so to do. Dr Tegwyn Williams does not use or invite anyone who was medically qualified.</font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="5"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The Clinic team wrote in the team assessment from the three monthly Sections at the Caswell Clinic, that they wanted to build a relationship with the Appellant as an outpatient and draw him in.</font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="6"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">But each time the Appellant would attend Caswell clinic Dr Tegwyn Williams would arrange that Police were called to arrest him.</font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="7"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">In the end, to prevent the General Medical Council acting on what Dr Tegwyn Williams does wrong, he brought zero tolerance prosecutions by claiming, in short, that lawful accurate comments that were not defamatory, made him feel harassed.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">   </span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;">   </span></font></font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Changes in law and interpretations.</font></font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span></font></font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="8"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Does it matter that what the Appellant says is accurate and not defamatory and now changes in the law (reform of public order Section 5) also means that an insult is no longer meant to be harassment ?</font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="9"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Also Courts have decided to recognise playful or eccentric comments as not malicious and with the example of a jovial threat to blow up the airport as meaning to be light hearted. </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="10"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">That light hearted meaning is very relevant to the Appellant as his ‘Wanted posters’, were clearly meant to be light hearted comment from a man well now as a harmless eccentric.</font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="11"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Where is the proportionality in wanting to imprison a 67 year old man for making accurate, reasonable, eccentric, light hearted but entirely justified and necessary comment ?</font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;">Stafford NHS scandal, the Need for Freedom of Expression and Appellant’s course of conduct and alleged Breach, can stop suffering and worse</b>. </font></font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="12"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Mr Jeremy Hunt, the Coalition Health Minister encourages the need for people to be able to speak out when things go wrong in the NHS and that no gagging Orders should exist on NHS conduct. Especially as around 1200 people needlessly died at Stafford as there was no where to complain and little way to speak out</font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="13"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">There are said to be at least fifteen other hospital Trust like Stafford. </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and “incompatibility” </font></font></b> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="14"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The Appellant would be raises whether the Criminal Court of Appeal would grant permission for an application to ague “incompatibility” on how the Act is not compatible with Human and Fundamental Rights and that Parliament could not have known the effect that it’s legislation would have.</font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="15"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">As we are aware it is for the Higher Courts to declare incompatibility and for Parliament to remove that incompatibility, if it so wishes. </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="16"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">It is said that the ‘course of conduct’ in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is unique to the UK. No other country has it. Other countries make do with stalking laws and other like measures. One reason why all other countries do not use ‘a course of conduct’ as a criminal offence is that it is said that this kind of law is open to too many problems and abuse. </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="17"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">One of the four cornerstones of EU law is that a person must be able to tell that their conduct would be a criminal offence. The UK law interprets that as would know with advice of a lawyer. </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="18"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Yet full time Judges decide on if a course of conduct amount to harassment in ways that the best lawyers in the UK cannot predict how Judges will interpret what amounts to harassment in for example the zero tolerance, white collar, neighbour or family disputes. The appellant believes that means that the Protection from Harassment Act is clearly not compatible with EU law, and that is but one example. </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <ol style="MARGIN-TOP:0cm;" start="19"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font> <li style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">With the Malicious Communications Act 2003, a new stalking law and various other measures and that the Harassment Act is know to be so widely over used and miss used, many call for the 1997 Act to fade away, in favour of expanding the scope of other laws </font></li><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></ol><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"> </font> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 18pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Maurice John Kirk BVSc</font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt 18pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">12 March 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p> <p>My 64 page statement completed as police helicopter hovered over head as armed police surrounded the matrimonial home (see blog below of home and aerodrome up for auction due to a broken marriage) with frightend wife citing this incident, in divorce papers, due to Operation Orchid, to snatch our then 10 year old daughter at the same time as my hand cuffs clicked on.</p> <p>Who will be next to suffer under power crazy South Wales Police Hierarchy?</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/09%2006%2019%20%20%2064%20pages%20of%20Witness%20Statement%20of%20Maurice%20John%20Kirkl.pdf">09 06 19 64 pages of Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirkl.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/Maurice%20Kirk%20v%20Dr%20T%20W%20Williams.docx">Maurice Kirk v Dr T W Williams.docx</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/11%2003%2010%20Dr%20T%20W%20position%20statement%20%20(1).pdf">11 03 10 Dr T W position statement (1).pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/GMC.pdf">GMC.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/Glamorgan%20Gem%2030th%20Sept%2010.pdf">Glamorgan Gem 30th Sept 10.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/10%2009%2006%20SWP_Claimant_interim_Skeleton.pdf">10 09 06 SWP_Claimant_interim_Skeleton.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/10%2009%2006%20SWP_Claimant_interim_Skeleton.pdf">10 09 06 SWP_Claimant_interim_Skeleton.pdf</a></p> <p>TO stop this trial from starting Dolmans, solicitors advised Barbara Wilding and MAPPA meetings in Caswell Clinic, would you believe, on how  to instigate her Metropolitan Police intorduced tactic of a 'shoot to kill' policy but first she had  had to get me  registered MAPPA level 3, using Dr Williams, in order for it to be a 'lawful kill' </p> <p>the 22nd June 09 police raid , using well over twenty, some armed, police officers, and helicopter, under Operation Chalice' to surround our home was co-ordinjated with anotter pack of police officers , under Operation Orchid' in order to snatch our daughter.....telling my wife I was so dangerous a threat to her and the general public our Genevieve was to be 'taken into care'.   Kirstie had other ideas.</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/aircaraft_and_airshows/South-Wales-Airfield-FOR-SALE.aspx">http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/aircaraft_and_airshows/South-Wales-Airfield-FOR-SALE.aspx</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/10%2012%207%20MJK%20MAPPA%20Executive%20Summary.pdf">10 12 7 MJK MAPPA Executive Summary.pdf</a></p> <p>To stop this on going trial , currently in Cardiff County Court, for police now proven police criminal conduct and harassment damages,  from ever reaching cross examination stage, first it was 'my possession of a machine gun 'fiasco and then the State playing this fabricated medical 'findings', their 'Gulag Card', as seventeen years of police harassment, so far and HM assisted 'treacle treatment; whough Cardiff's iniquitous law courts had failed to block the true state of both our law courts , prisons and police forces, right across The Principality.</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/09%2009%2003%20MG%20Trans%20Redacted.pdf">09 09 03 MG Trans Redacted.pdf</a></p> <p>Their Lordships, together with the documentary evidence that Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams knowingly falsified, in the presence of South Wales Police officers, his Sect 9 countersigned witness statements, to obtain my false imprisonment, are to consider the 'ramifications' of the enclosed transcript from part of 4th May 12 'Breach of Restraining Order' conviction hearing, now the  subject of their deliberations.</p> <p>The transcript clearly indicates, just as in the 2010 'machine gun' scandalous jury tria, l was refused even my legal papers and personal court exhibits even in thew  court room!</p> <p>On 4th May2012 His Honour Judge Curran QC, whilst I was forced to be absent due to requiring urgent medical attention, had refused me Dr Williams or any others, named, to be either my 'character witness' or as a 'witness of fact'.</p> <p>On 1st December 2011 District Judge John Charles had done exactly the same, in my absence, when he convict me for 'harassment' of Dr Williams following the publishing of further falsifed documents by Dr Tegwyn Williams, namely,  my series of NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic psychiatric reports culminating, on 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court, that I be further sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, due to 'significant brain damage' and 'possible cancer', in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison.</p> <p>Closer scutiny of my Casswel Clinic, Bridgend, medical records, discloses, as in his October 2009 psychiatric report, his other and most pressing reason as to why I had to be moved to Broadmoor or Ashworth was because of 'veiled' threats , he told me, of 'reprisals' by an old gentleman by the name of Norman Scarth!</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/T20120090%20-%20Kirk%20-%20proc%20from%2010.40%20-%2012.26%20-%2004.05.12.pdf">T20120090 - Kirk - proc from 10.40 - 12.26 - 04.05.12.pdf</a></p> <p>Experts in the field confirm there was no sign of relevant brain damage BEFORE Williams even writes the report without appropriate qualifications.</p> <p>On 7th August 09, when he wrote his first released psychiatric report, [previous others only for MAPPA South Wales Police meetings], as His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC stated, when refusing, recently, to 'strike out' my one million pound damages claim against NHS (Wales), without evening examining his patient! </p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/Rectum%20Payment.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/Rectum%20Payment.jpg" alt="" /></a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/09%2009%2001radiologist%20scans%20report.pdf">09 09 01radiologist scans report.pd</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/09%2009%2030%20INTERIM%20PSYCHIATRIC%20REPORT%20Oct1%202009%20%20REDACTED.pdf">09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/09%2012%2002%20Transcript%20Crn%20Crt%20REDACTED.pdf">09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/09%2012%2017%20%20Court%20Hearing%20to%20Extend%20IPP.pdf">09 12 17 Court Hearing to Extend IPP.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/03/20/the-supreme-court-on-harassment-purpose-and-rationality/#more-17700">http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/03/20/the-supreme-court-on-harassment-purpose-and-rationality/#more-17700</a></p> <p>You may like to Google  'The Real Maurice Kirk'  and come to the County Court tomorrow and Crown court on Thursday</p> <p>ps  My birthday is on Tuesday</p> <p> Quiz Time:</p> <p>What does a Duchess, a dairy maid and a cow have in common</p> <p>clue:</p> <p>It was most unlikely my father fought on the D-Day Beaches</p> <p>Answer:</p> <p>Work it out for yourself</p> <p>my e-mail is <a href="mailto:maurice@kirkflyingvet.com">maurice@kirkflyingvet.com</a></p> <p> </p> <p>Subject: </p> <div style="FONT-FAMILY:arial black,sans-serif;FONT-SIZE:large;" class="gmail_quote">Signing up to 'I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK' at PledgeBank.com<br /><br />Please click on the link below to confirm your signature on the<br />pledge at the bottom of this email.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.pledgebank.com/L/BVyQLvFuTJTaBt79hA" target="_blank"><font color="#0066cc">http://www.pledgebank.com/L/</font><font color="#0066cc">BVyQLvFuTJTaBt79hA</font></a><br /><br />The pledge was created by Patrick Cullinane and reads:<br /><br />'I will I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the<br />Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st<br />October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of<br />JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK but only if 150 other<br />people from the UK will do the same. We the People in the UK<br />have been denied our GUARANTEED RIGHTS to due-process via the<br />Common Law Trial by Jury, which is the Law of the Land.'<br /><br />Yours,<br />the PledgeBank.com team</div> <div style="FONT-FAMILY:arial black,sans-serif;FONT-SIZE:large;" class="gmail_quote"></div> <div style="FONT-FAMILY:arial black,sans-serif;FONT-SIZE:large;" class="gmail_quote"> <div style="FONT-FAMILY:arial black,sans-serif;FONT-SIZE:large;" class="gmail_default">ends</div></div> <div class="gmail_quote"><br /></div><img src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2863" width="1" height="1">Her Majesty's PrerogativeFelicity NortonRoyal College of Veterinary SurgeonsfreemasonsHM ImmunityYouTubeSouth Wales PoliceCaswell ClinicRoyal Courts of JusticeGlamorgan GemMAPPAmorphineCardiff County CourtFraud ActDr Tegwyn WilliamsNHSIPCCVale of Glamorgan ShowAlun Cairns MPDavid SisslingUKColumnHM Privy CouncilHM Court ServiceGMCAbuse of ProcessLord Justice MosesMichelle CollinsMcKenzie FriendsRCVSDr Bruce FergussonLuigi StranatiMusa Parents Found Guilty of Child Crueltyhttp://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2012/07/03/musa-jury-are-out.aspxTue, 03 Jul 2012 10:45:00 GMTc7306cf9-8c9b-4f2c-8f21-f8b2637dc339:2564Maurice Kirk2http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2564http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2012/07/03/musa-jury-are-out.aspx#comments<p> Sentance date     14th August<br /></p> <p align="center"><b>Michelle Collins a Liar and a ‘Can of Worms' in Musa Wood Green Crown Court Trial</b></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Musa-Children-under--Serious-Threat.aspx">http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Musa-Children-under--Serious-Threat.aspx</a></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Reporting-In.aspx">http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Reporting-In  </a></p><p align="center">http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Seven-Snatched-Nigerian-Children.aspx</p><p align="center">   <br /></p> <p>I now understand His Honour Judge Patrick is an ordained priest with particular interests relating to this case not unlike the General  Pinochet case and Lord Hoffman, the latter being my old adversary at HM Privy Council's Judicial Committee's RCVS and Guernsey hearings, then held in Downing Street.</p> <p> I arrived, yesterday, to pick up purely gossip, I hasten to add, that a para legal from Powell Spencer, solicitors, of Kilburn High Road, had been called by the prosecution, after their case and that of the defence had been closed.</p> <p>But this African woman turned out to be from the very same law firm that had first taken instructions from the Musas, last year in June, whilst they were in custody in Hornsey police station under arrested for these allegations of ‘child cruelty'.</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Musa-Files-Confiscated-Unlawfully.aspx">http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/Musa-Files-Confiscated-Unlawfully.aspx</a></p> <p> I was asked to come over from Brittany to help, as a Mackenzie Friend, only to be gaoled due to the lies from Haringey Council lawyers, anything to leave the Musas more vulnerable in the oh so secret UK Family Court system. </p> <p>Despite matters of ‘legal privilege' and written permission needed to be given, by both clients, she slipped in irrelevancies to why the judge had given her permission, including her client(s) confidentially discussed issues. All this and more was unusually disclosed, apparently, on Thursday, to clear up a query over the statements made whilst under caution to the police.</p> <p> She did not miss the opportunity in saying her client(s) refused to take her advice..... right in front of the jury.</p> <p>But this was the law firm in around mid September 11 that had refused to hand over, to the Musas, their own legal records, on termination of their employment, despite having agreed they had no lien on them. This called for our delegation to visit the lawyers as someone suspected the makings of a conspiracy.</p> <p>We stood our ground until I was dragged across the floor and out of the solicitor's office door and onto the street by two burly policemen determined not to make an arrest and thereby start an audit trial. Mr Musa heard and saw it all.</p> <p>I went back a few days later, deliberately on my own, with letter of permission from the Musas, as the firm indicated the legal papers could now be collected. This turned out not to be the case as some other lawyer had, apparently, countermanded their release and proposed releasing them only to another unauthorised third party. </p> <p>This definitely smelt fishy so I asked for my own legal papers back having employed, without them realising, the same paralegal whilst being sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, at Tottenham police station, just a few days earlier. Sectioned, it was becoming obvious, to get me away from the Musa family once and for all.</p> <p>The Metropolitan Police applied at Haringey Magistrates that I be further sectioned to St Anns psychiatric prison, reliant purely on Cardiff Crown Court 2009's psychiatric reports which, in themselves, had been fabricated when the South Wales Police had realised the Farnborough Air Show ‘machine gun case', against me, was also going ‘pear shaped'. I was kept me in custody for three days.</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/_A300_100_2C00_000-Machine-Gun-Reward.aspx">http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/_A300_100_2C00_000-Machine-Gun-Reward.aspx</a></p> <p>Criminal allegations, all later dropped, included ‘criminal damage' and ‘conspiracy to abduct the children' ie fly them back to Nigeria in my WW2 two seat Piper Cub.</p> <p>This para-legal ‘bl**k b**ch', as I may have described her, on account of her conduct in the cells, contrary to my instructions, led to my receiving a Public Order conviction, quite unrelated, then used by the South Wales Police to successfully oppose my release from custody all this winter in Cardiff Prison.  </p> <p>To obtain this criminal conviction, assisting in the HM Cardiff prosecution's cases,  May 12 jury trial for ‘Breach of a Restraining Order' and arising from District Judge John Charles' 1<sup>st</sup> December 2012 ‘Harassment' summary conviction, someone had to, obviously, now distort  the facts and stop my attending the London court.</p> <p>Tottenham police station psychiatrists wrote a report using MAPPA/FTAC South Wales Police nonsense which prevented my release and so help the Musa family. </p> <p>The very doctor who had singularly signed the original 2009 MAPPA  Crown Court psychiatric reports, stating I had both ‘significant brain damage' and ‘possible brain tumour', is now destined, I am pleased to hear, shortly to go before the General Medical Council on this and other more serious issues.</p> <p> While talking of fishes he is the least important target currently in the sights of my loaded gun as the ramifications of his conduct is frightening. </p> <p>HMP Cardiff refused to allow my attending the London's 28<sup>th</sup> November 11 ‘Public Order' magistrate's court. Spenser Powell telephonist, for my second visit to the law firm, stated I had called her a ‘b**ck b**ch' which was quite untrue.</p> <p> She had nothing whatever to do with the incident as my complaints to police were re the Musa/Haringey Council cover up and for lawyers, again, conspiring for my incarceration for their financial gain (see Dolmans, lawyers for Welsh Police).</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/South-Wales-Police-Conspiracy-to-Have-me-Shot.aspx">http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/South-Wales-Police-Conspiracy-to-Have-me-Shot.aspx</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/files/folders/south_wales_police/entry2543.aspx">http://kirkflyingvet.com/files/folders/south_wales_police/entry2543.aspx</a></p> <p>Upon my 1<sup>st</sup> December 11 release from Cardiff prison I was immediately ‘gate arrested' and returned to Haringey court for sentence, refused  a rehearing, with HM Court Service denying later I had sent in an appeal within the statutory 21 days. A minor but politically sensitive criminal conviction it may be but it is now on my PNC record for life, the tactics originally played to have me struck off. </p> <p>Not only did I get that unfair conviction but also received one for FTS, ‘failing to surrender', both used, later, by District Judge John Charles and others when blocking my various September 11 to May 12 bail applications from Cardiff prison.</p> <p>It helped cause to have written, on the 20<sup>th</sup> January 2012  Cardiff Remand Warrant the words <i> ‘mental health issues'</i>, explaining, perhaps, how it took seventeen prison officers to drag me out of the prison hospital unit before someone, most unexpected, later intervened and supplied me with a copy. </p> <p>No wonder, I must consider, I was not needed for a defence witness to ridicule actress re Michelle Collins and her deceitful account on oath.</p> <p> I heard by chance, from the judge in his summing up, yesterday, of her evidence of lies. What really happened, the tape recording of her fowl language on the way, when we twice went there desperately looking for one of the children, last seen in her North London house with the others, near Alexandra Place......but dark forces contol our judiciary only understood by those who havew worn the T shirt, read the book and seen the movie</p> <p>PS </p> <p>Rang court office, today, to send this info, if relevant, to the judge.  After much hassle I was  told the manager, Ms Kavalleres, would ring back with appropriate e-mail but that was over eleven hours ago!!!!  Enclose better version of my letter to the judge should anyone, in the interest of the general public, consider to go elswhere on all this apparent abuse of process, so much the norm these days. </p> <p><a href="http://blazoncornwall.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/british-church-and-judiciary-run-by-a-den-of-vipers/#comment-33">http://blazoncornwall.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/british-church-and-judiciary-run-by-a-den-of-vipers/#comment-33</a></p><p>Addendum 17th July 2012</p><p>The Musas</p><p>                 are now refusing to go to the oppressive outrageous secret family courts, their latest hearing being at the Royal Courts of Justice today and tomorrow {Tues. 17 July}, where they are rushing through the adoptions of the remaining 5 Musa children to get the case closed, cut and dried. </p><p>On Friday a prison lackey tried to serve papers on Chiwar for his + Glorias presence on todays and tomorrows sham hearings at the RCJ - Chiwar refused taking these papers and refused to go to the secret closed court - for the final stages for the adoptions of his 5 children, the 2 babies have already been passed for adoption - this being done "without attendance" by judge Charles a couple of weeks ago. "without attendance" means this so-called judge can just issue his directives without anybody else being within 100 miles of him - no opposition - no nothing. </p><p>I pray daily for their demise .</p> <img src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2564" width="1" height="1">South Wales PoliceMachine GunMAPPACardiff County CourtGeneral Medical CouncilFailed DisclosureAbuse of ProcessLawful RebellionNHS WALESMusa familyMichelle Collins Musa Trial Today but is Your Daughter now Safe Anywhere in UK?http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2012/06/27/and-you-think-your-daughter-is-safe-in-south-wales.aspxWed, 27 Jun 2012 12:39:00 GMTc7306cf9-8c9b-4f2c-8f21-f8b2637dc339:2553Maurice Kirk7http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2553http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2012/06/27/and-you-think-your-daughter-is-safe-in-south-wales.aspx#comments<p>Go Petition summary by Sabine</p> <p> <a href="http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/the-secrecy-of-the-family-courts-should-be-lifted-now.html">http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/the-secrecy-of-the-family-courts-should-be-lifted-now.html</a> </p> <p>So what made me focus on the Family Court system here in South Wales? Read on......... </p> <p>South Wales Police launched 30+ men, many armed and with a helicopter, all at your expense just to snatch one ten year old child from our front garden on that sunny afternoon Sunday three years ago.</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/9%206%20SWP%20Dolmans%20app%20re%20Wit%20exchange.pdf">9 6 SWP Dolmans app re Wit exchange.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/9%206%2022%20SWP%20Machine%20gun%20Dolmans%20arrest.pdf">9 6 22 SWP Machine gun Dolmans arrest.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/09%2006%2019%20SWP%20Witness%20Statement%20of%20Maurice%20John%20Kirk%20final.pdf">09 06 19 SWP Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirk final.pdf</a></p> <p><u>BUT after three years of police CPS and Dolmans ignoring Cardiff Court Orders I finally get </u> my 'hot and sweaty' on still more proof of the machine gun / false psychiatric reports conspiracy IPCC continue to ignore and this only came in last week because I repeated the application in Bristol Crown Court, in ENGLAND..... <a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/09%2006%2020%20SWP%20Dolmans%20MG%2011.pdf">09 06 20 SWP Dolmans MG 11.pdf</a>, that their own solictors, Dolmans of Cardiff, gave advice relating to the FTAC/MAPPA conspiracy over an old WW1 Lewis Machine Gun, excellent for rabbiting, bolted on my aircaft in order to try and get me shot!</p> <p>And who still dares say '<a href="http://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/the-deeper-issues/hm-partnership/">HM Partnership</a>' is still not thriving in these evil Cardiff buildings?</p> <p>Will your family be next?</p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y&noredirect=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y&noredirect=1</a></p> <p>Three times in HM Cardiff Prison and three times, in row, assaulted by Prison Officer Myers, bigger than me, last time punching me in the face and stomach to then knocking me to the ground onto my had hip whilst returning to court in order to deny me my legal papers overnight.</p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/12%2006%2025%20SWP%20Prison%20assault%20reply_0001.pdf">12 06 25 SWP Prison assault reply_0001.pdf</a><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/12%2004%2016%20HMP%20reply%20to%20MP.pdf">12 04 16 HMP reply to MP.pdf</a>  & this grossly inaccurate HM letter <a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/12%2004%2016%20HMP%20reply%20to%20MP.pdf">12 04 16 HMP reply to MP.pdf</a> & refused bail application until a JR is file in court....outragios behavior <a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/12%2006%2012%20JR%20re%20refused%20bail%20applications.pdf">12 06 12 JR re refused bail applications.pdf</a> & Harassment State a Case JR .....shortly</p> <p> </p> <p><b><font size="5">THIS E-MAIL just came my way</font> but I do NOT vouch for all its content as, obviously, some of it was without my witnessing it as to what really happened.</b></p> <p><b>However, much of it I KNOW IS TRUE and therefore allowed on this and my other sites of mine should the judges close it down , as they have done in the past..... Hi </b><i>- we saw Chiwar yesterday and he said the following:<br /> <br />he was incensed that no statements, from those who had made them, went to the jury as the prosecution refused this and the judge backed it.<br /> <br />He also said Owusu's summing up statement was cut short by the judge - he had an 80 page statement and was given till 1 oclock to deliver it but was cut off at 12 oclock, thus not even finishing his summing up. Nobody ive spoken to has a good word to say about the defence team and i agree certain things shouldve been done properly wrongly.<br /></i></p> <p><i>Eg. - the witnesses. i know the 2 defence witnesses who spoke - Steve and Vicki.  Steve is a pastor and came to 1 hearing as a supporter at Gee St. court last June which was a closed hearing and i saw him twice at the Musas W Green Rd home when i was there. He would pray with the Musas and they would get into it and begin dancing as he would speak in tongues for 10 mins whilst praying with the Musas which ive never seen before from a supposed Christian pastor. I asked him later was this healthy and a correct thing to do given the circumstances and he said whatever he was saying was good and was confusing the devil who had no idea what he was saying. I pointed out that nobody else did either - not even him and he said it was of no consequence as whatever he was saying was good and was Gods message and will that it be said.<br /></i></p> <p><i>Anyway Steve wouldve witnessed Chiwar + Gloria acting responsibly at all times with their children which i guess was the point of him being called at all.<br /></i></p> <p><i>Musa was incensed that the witnesses for the defence who did not give evidence or were not asked for statements to be shown were:<br />Maurice Kirk<br />Kay Young<br />Paul Randle=Jolliffe<br />Cecilia Gibson<br />Moji Word<br />any of the intimidated witnesses who were affected by H'gey because of having dealings with H'gey / Adesida, often having children removed/threatened to have that. Those i met and spoke with were: </i></p> <p><i>Christine Danko, Janice, another Vicki, and 2 others i forget the names of. Gloria introduced me to these people last May and they all told outrageous tales.<br />Frank Gad<br />Janet Owugah<br />Peter Lee, from  H'gey child services<br />Dr. Adesida<br />Rosita Moise H'gey solicitor<br />Joyce Agekyum sw H'gey<br />Annie Walker  head sw H.gey<br />Sharon Fair<br />Alison Brooks<br /></i></p><p><i>Karen who lived downstairs, to answer questioning about ****** being locked in the garden as it is alleged.<br /> <br />- thats 21 people off the tops of Chiwars and mine and Helens heads who couldve given something specific eg. Kays interraction with H'gey sw's who she threatened so much with her knowledge of the law etc. that they hounded her for months after, and H'gey + connected employees who needed questioning about their roles in it all, especially Agekyum and the rest of the H'gey lot mentioned. Chiwar said Moise the H'gey lawyer was responsible for writing the statements so as they would be legally sound especially in court and this needed to be brought out.<br /> <br />Musa mentioned about ketamine being put  in a syringe. on the 28 june at st thomas's hospital. He knew it was that because he checked the discarded bottle after watching its contents - ketamine - being put in a syringe. I know a syringe with a liquid in was mentioned the other day. He asks was this given to the baby, and why was it set up in the 1st place and by whom, and hospital staff need to be asked about this.<br /> <br />An important point Chiwar mentioned was that even to date the contents of that 2000 page report that was handed to the defence team one morning early on in the trial still has not been properly discussed with the Musas - who still arent aware of some of its contents. Chiwar says a lot of the time Owusu doesnt see them before the days proceedings to discuss things, as theyre either late on getting to  court or Owusu + co simply dont go to see them before the day starts. One dreads what else hasnt been discussed with the Musas thats been received by the defence team at the last minute. He thinks SERCO deliberatly bring them late for this reason + other reasons.<br /> <br />Chiwar says the their DNA test results was not shown to the jury and shouldve been but was refused by the CPS + judge + should be sent in at once also for the jury to see, and the 85 page statement Gloria made for the family court last November should be given to the jury.<br /> <br />Apparently at the prison Chiwar was told by other prisoners that a prisoner who goes by the name of "Floky" was putting it about that the Musas were involved in trafficking 15 children, plus their own. Chiwar assumes this guy is connected to H'gey in some form and trying to get Chiwar beaten. The warders apparently moved Chiwar for a short while for his own safety but now it is ok he says. If you recall the warders at Holloway were allegedly responsible Gloria says for putting it about that she was insane and dangerous and everyone should avouid her and not befriend her. Of course very soon people could see the opposite, and also when other inmates would be murdered by prison staff as happened to the prisoner - long story.<br /> <br />At the hospital on the 28 June Musa says no way was he gone longer than 30 mins when he left - if even that - and no way was he gone 3 hours till midday as they claim.<br /></i></p> <p><i>He says cctv footage stills from his flat in W Green rd werent shown which showed the place very habitable - the opposite to what the cps claim., and he says other photos werent shown to the jury either.<br /> <br />Chiwars says the judge was asked if he wanted to recuse himself but he refused and also refused getting a new jury for various reasons when asked by Owusu.<br /> <br />In reply to my earlier message  Hi - the musa case - the prosecution has refused many witnesses giving evidence for musa and the judge is backing the prosecution so we are giving these 5/6 banned witnesses statements to the higher judge at the court on monday in writing and emailing them also to make sure the court and hopefully jury get them also Already owusu has asked the judge to recuse himself over things but he has refused also a new jury. If u can pls send ur witness statement so it can be given 1st thing monday a.m. to the chief judge lyons at the court along with other stuff then. Pls if u can send by email to me asap it can be printed off for monday - tks - {which i sent to those i had addresses of at the time} </i></p><p><i>*****replied:</i></p> <p><i>I've already given my statement to the court and I believe it went to the jury but wasn't read out. It is now too late for any more statements as all the barristers have finished their cases and now it's just for the judge to sum up and send the jury out on Monday. So if they are convicted these new statements can go towards the appeal, especially if they add anything to the medical issues or are from people who knew the older 5 children. Pity these witnesses suddenly appearing after the trial is over! But actually, I think it will come out OK as Owusu did a magnificent job on Friday and it will be very hard for the jury to find the Musas guilty after what he said to them. Fingers crossed! B<br /> <br />I disagree its too late - the point of getting the statements from the people where possible and sending them to the court after speaking with Chiwar was so the jury could see them and it isnt too late as the trial isnt finished yet. Waiting to give the statements at an "appeal" i disagree with as these statements could add good factors to Musas case before the jury retire and waiting maybe a year - a year for the Musas in prison too -  for an appeal is unacceptable in my opinion. I think they would drag an appeal date out so as the other children could be gone via adoption before an appeal hearing which would just add difficulties in sorting this entire child removal side of the case out.<br /> <br />Owusu may have done a "magnificent job" as is suggested but maybe being allowed to finish what he set out to do re: his summing up he mightve made an even better one, as well as doing other important things too, like discussing new bundles with the Musas amongst other things. After all, thats his job.<br /> <br />To my great sadness and frustration however im thinking now it is practically possible to get statements from those Chiwar wanted statements from to show to the jury by the time they could be delivered to judge Lyons on Monday morning as they simply will not be got and sent to Lyons in time, him being the head judge at Wood Green crown court. Obviously if they were given to Patrick they would be refused and i dont think theres any reason on earth why Lyons cant be given the statements except for the time limit - there is only a few hours to get them there physically in print on Monday morning. They could be sent by email of course but they need perhaps to be physically given to the court office so as Lyons can receive them and take action, so it fills me with sadness the negative option of perhaps showing these what might be important statements only at any "appeal hearing" in the distant future might be the only action taken for Chiwars request. <br /></i></p> <p><i>Anyhow if anybody can send their statement to me asap i will endeavour to email it to the court and send it 24 hour delivery on Monday morning so as the court + Lyons receives it on Tues hopefully which maybe wont be too late, or if anyone can think of a better alternative please let us know. <br /></i></p> <p><i>At the end of the day i think not having witnesses for the Musas, as good as Steve and Vicki are, is simply not good enough. The defence team are supposed to be doing the job of defending the Musas and surely witnesses are an important factor in their case. <br /> <br />Heather pointed out an expert toxicoligist shouldve been got as a witness by the defence, if possible. Only prosecution medical staff have been heard at all which is totally one-sided.<br /> <br />Also the person who was at the hospital on the 28 June - the person referred to as Gloria's "sister" when Gloria was asked who she was then by hospital or H'gey staff - shouldve given evidence as to what she heard and saw then - Chiwar maintains Gloria, for example, was not "laughing" at various times as was claimed and was was taking things with the seriousness they deserved throughout which this witness couldve confirmed.            <br /> <br />Ian Josephs points out things that shouldve been done too that werent - like asking the children in a certain way if they were coerced into saying things, and asking in a certain way about the alleged abuse on ****** = to ****** herself and Denise Bassett - in the event the abuse wasnt mentioned at all in the trial.</i><i>  </i></p> <p><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y&noredirect=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y&noredirect=1</a></i></p><i> <p><a href="http://newafricanpress.com/2011/10/16/maurice-kirks-account-of-the-musas-family-saga/">http://newafricanpress.com/2011/10/16/maurice-kirks-account-of-the-musas-family-saga/</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/maurice.kirk.16">http://www.facebook.com/maurice.kirk.16</a></p> <p><a href="http://therealipcc.wordpress.com/maurice-kirk/">http://therealipcc.wordpress.com/maurice-kirk/</a></p> <p>How to complain about your GP South Wales lot refusinging me a NHS (Wales) brain scan to eventually gaol the b*****d </p> <p> <a href="http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#search/no-reply%40wordpress.com/1317580a216caf24">http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#search/no-reply%40wordpress.com/1317580a216caf24</a></p> <p>Meanwhile all this takes its toll </p> <p><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/12%2006%2018%20%20Section%208%20%20%20JR%20%20Application%2018th%20June%202012.pdf">12 06 18 Section 8 JR Application 18th June 2012.pdf</a></p> <p><a href="http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#search/no-reply%40wordpress.com/1317580a216caf24">http://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#search/no-reply%40wordpress.com/1317580a216caf24</a></p> <p> And if the enemy wish to continue to cheat let us bring in the Big Guns</p> <p><a href="http://victims-unite.net/2012/06/28/international-three-day-fast-and-praying-for-the-musas-starting-today/">http://victims-unite.net/2012/06/28/international-three-day-fast-and-praying-for-the-musas-starting-today/</a></p> <p> </p></i> <p> </p><i></i><img src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2553" width="1" height="1">South Wales PoliceMachine GunRoyal Courts of JusticeMAPPAProfessor Roger WoodIPCCGeneral Medical CouncilAlun Cairns MPUKColumncontempt of courtHM Court ServiceGMCAbuse of ProcessLawful RebellionNHS WALESprivate prosecutionLord Justice MosesUK family courtsHaringey CouncilMichelle CollinsDr BarnardosSouth Wales Police cover-upMusa snatched childrenIPCC refuse South Wales Police Investigation re Musa Children current Trialhttp://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2012/05/18/ipcc-refuse-south-wales-police-investigation-re-musa-children.aspxFri, 18 May 2012 10:10:00 GMTc7306cf9-8c9b-4f2c-8f21-f8b2637dc339:2506Maurice Kirk4http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2506http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2012/05/18/ipcc-refuse-south-wales-police-investigation-re-musa-children.aspx#comments<p>This week's Bristol Crown Court application, for disclosure of court and custody records, flows from my apparent application for bail, some weeks ago, from within Cardiff prison. Its purpose was to compare the perverse variation in judicial ‘ground rules' available for a prisoner in England to one, less fortunate and found to be incarcerated in Wales and especially in Cardiff</p> <p>.</p> <p>His Honour Judge Julian Lambert has just informed me that the Cardiff Magistrates Court again insists <u>‘there are no records'</u> to be released for me to prosecute my long awaited Crown Court appeal on this Friday, 25<sup>th </sup>May. The court was also reminded that the Crown Prosecution Service again remains ‘unavailable for comment'. I have made, now, well over seventy court applications in Cardiff on this and related matters of ‘failed disclosure' and yet it has only taken one such application in an English court to witness a positive response and the likelihood of the proverbial ‘fire works' when disclosure of public records is finally achieved.</p> <p> This apparent unlawful use of Section 36, applied to an incident that occurred almost two years ago, in Cardiff Crown Court and causing my admission to hospital, may be why it has been so delayed and moved out of the area for fear of publicity. </p> <p>The outcome of all my recent Cardiff Administrative Court, High Court, County Court, Crown Court and Magistrate Court hearings, since February, whilst imprisoned and unable to be appropriately legally represented, has found me facing yet another five year prison term, such as the scandalous MAPPA based indictments in the 2009 ‘WW1 machine gun' fiasco.</p> <p>All my seventeen ongoing cases, including private prosecutions stifled by successive Cardiff Crown Court judges, rely purely on whether a court and especially one consisting of a jury, be allowed sight of and understanding of ‘evidence', only in the ‘control' of either HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) or the South Wales Police. </p> <p>Any evidence that might ‘undermine' the prosecution's case is invariably not disclosed in Cardiff courts as was proven in my first twenty odd appearances this year.  </p> <p>There are inherent dangers for the unsuspecting Welshman who must be warned, should a repeat mistake be made as with the Welsh Assembly, by he or she now voting for an independent judiciary, as it will only exacerbate these already serious anomalies. </p> <p> Cardiff courts, over the past twenty years, have deliberately withheld public records from me and my helpers in their attempt to cover up, ‘what really goes on in our courts'. These issues, hopefully, will be touched upon by Her Majesty's Crown Prosecution Service on this Tuesday afternoon.</p> <p>Incidentally, Bristol Crown Court, last week, had me before the judge in less than 24 hours of them being aware of my application even being in the building! Oh, so different to Cardiff. </p> <p> Bristol court was told I had already been sentenced to a nine months term of imprisonment by prior arrangement of ‘HM Partnership'. Their agreed release date, for me, was to coincide, as usual, with the last day of my trial, irrespective of the verdict. </p> <p>For the purists, who know my background, I should note that someone rather spiteful, at the very last minute, disallowed consideration for my time in custody with the Metropolitan Police, just before Christmas, thereby extending my custodial period by a further five days. I had been snatched to prevent my giving evidence on behalf of the Musa parents refused bail in their continuing case, this week, of their, now, seven  snatched children by Haringey Council. The Nigerian family face division by forced adoption and deportation.</p> <p><b>Regina v Chiwar Musa & Gloria Musa, </b>Wood Green Crown Court, London, Monday 21<sup>st</sup> May 2012 at 10am <b>...... <i>See You There</i></b></p> <p><b><i><a href="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/michelle%20colllins%20007%20(3)%20-%20Copy.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/michelle%20colllins%20007%20(3)%20-%20Copy.jpg" alt="" /></a>  </i></b><b></b></p> <p>‘Operation Orchid' launched a police helicopter and a significant number of armed police across South Wales when Barbara Wilding tried to have snatched, by Social Services, my own daughter, then ten years of age, on the 22<sup>nd</sup> June 2009, using ‘Operation Chalice' as their excuse.</p> <p> Following the cross examination of the first four police officers, revealing the conspiracy in that 2009 ‘machine gun' trial to get me jailed IPP and that the gun had been made ‘operational' after I had sold her, a year earlier, the ‘Cardiff cabal', consisting of judiciary, police others, have again huddled around some MAPPA table, in some dingy Welsh police office and conspired to implement a whole new meaning to be applied for Section 36 of the Youth and Justice Criminal Evidence Act 1999.<b></b></p> <p><b>It basically allows a court to appoint their own lawyer to conduct cross examination of their ‘sensitive' prosecution witnesses, even including the investigating police officers, despite obvious objections by this defendant.</b></p> <p>New witnesses, found well over a year ago, have still not been interviewed by the South Wales Police Professional Standards Department despite this gun's ‘re painting' by their own officers, to try and fool the 2009 jury, has been verified and reported to the IPCC.</p> <p> The gun's re-commissioning, contrary to Section 5(1) a of the 1968 Fire Arms Act, since I had sold her has also been verified and nothing done about it.</p> <p> Only this year, during one of my private prosecutions when trying to recover my confiscated property, police have verified ‘finding' an actual ‘prohibited weapon' and ‘prohibited ammunition', during the 2009 trial, in my home but have withheld this information until now.     </p> <p>And now, with still more new evidence, only this week, with one WW1 Lewis machine gun, bolted back on again, onto my old DH2 Farnborough Display biplane, now in Lincolnshire, the IPCC are again refusing to re-consider my original August 2009 complaint, from hospital and to order a properly conducted ‘independent' police investigation, by an external police force, well outside this corrupt riddled part of the United Kingdom, called South Wales.</p> <p> </p> <p>Bristol Crown, Case Progression Case e-mail<br />08:22 (3 hours ago)</p> <p>to me </p> <p><br />Please find enclosed response from HHJ Lambert.<br /> <br />Please acknowledge receipt of Mr Kirk’s e-mail and inform him that the documents will be placed on the judge’s papers ready for his application on Tuesday. Please place them on the papers. Regards<br /> <br />Case Progression Officer</p> <p> </p> <p> </p></b><img src="http://kirkflyingvet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2506" width="1" height="1">South Wales PoliceMAPPAIndependent Police Complaints CommissionIPCCFailed DisclosureAbuse of ProcessHaringey CouncilMichelle Collinschild traffickingchild snatching