Legal Battles : Data Protection Act

Edwina Hart AM Welsh Assembly Health Minister Steps In

Maurice Kirk — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 08:04:00 GMT

Edwina Hart AM delegates NHS officials to also try and obtain withheld medical evidence used in Cardiff Crown Court for an IPP attempt.

Her letter to me is here.

[The following three letters are just SAMPLES from one hundred of Maurice's letters on the delicate subject]

on September 15 to David Sissling, the Chief Executive of the Local Health Board
on September 18 to David Sissling
on September 19 to HM Treasury Solicitor Stephen Jones

Mr David Sissling
Chief Executive of Abertawe Morgannwg University Local Health Board
South Wales

18th Sept 2010

This week the trial judge adjourned the evidence from being heard from near a hundred police officers for about six months, in order that I may have my hip replacement and suggested I had another brain scan, thus avoiding the criminal weighted proof of NHS and private doctors having to disclose their incriminating evidence.

The considerable expense, thus incurred, was due to the NHS not overriding the false medical evidence that blocked my planned July operation to have been carried out in order that I might be ready for ten weeks of very enjoyable cross examination of those that caused my name being removed from the veterinary register, effectively, for life.

The learned judge was informed that my new Barry GP, my Cowbridge lot, for eighteen years, refusing to lift a finger to help, could not obtain a brain scan appointment for his patient as the Hospital maintained there was 'no evidence' I needed one.

Both Dr Williams and Professor Wood, witnessed, in total, by around sixteen psychiatrists and psychologists, called in to examine me and /or my medical records, following the September 09 findings by SPECT scan, decided I had 'significant brain damage' and a paranoid delusional disorder, the latter based on my fixated belief I was suffering persecution by his joint employers, with the NHS, the South Wales Police.

South Wales Police Forensic Psychiatric Service, in early September 09, required I had a second scan after three months that they have now quietly 'buried'. Why, because my expensive but privately arranged 1st December 09 Dr Kemp report, via lawyer 'extraordinaire', Mr Walter Sweeney and Consultant radiologist wife, Nuala.

Dr Kemp's report castigated the quite unnecessary intrusive procedure, an infusion of radioactive nuclear isotopes into my brain, ordered by Williams insisting the prisoner, under his personally concocted three month incarceration in his 'Gulag style' laboratory, reliant on CPS inspired Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act, writing his 3rd August psychiatric report without even a physical examination!

Today I have caused further disclosure of, as yet, withheld medical records, some of which I enclose, further giving support that a police investigation take place from outside South Wales.

If you do not expedite your duties to allow me my operation to go ahead, in safety, very soon, to relieve both pain and avoid the obvious side effects of morphine that could now affect my flying licences, I may be forced to take the law into my own hands, once again witnessing tyranny in our midst and to personally obtain those records from the named culprits, records under YOUR CONTROL, used on 2nd December 2009 in the CPS/police last ditch attempt to stop both the 'machine gun trial' and my seventeen year running damages trial against them from going ahead.

Yours faithfully

Mr David Sissling
Chief Executive of Abertawe Morgannwg University Local Health Board
South Wales

15th September 2010

Dear Sir,

Redacted Medical Records and Caswell Clinic Psychiatric Prison

Dr Ruth Bagshaw

This lady is yet to disclose any record, whatsoever, of her involvement with me in Caswell Clinic Psychiatric Prison last year. She has failed even to send to me a signed certified true copy of her letters to and from Professor Roger Wood, purportedly reporting on my 'significant brain damage' and 'possible brain tumour' later to be referred to by Dr Tegwyn Williams and the South Wales Police MAPPA and Crown Prosecution Service when successfully opposing my release from Cardiff Prison over seven months.

Judge Bidder QC states in his 13th inst. e-mail that Judge Cooke QC, on 1st October 09, ruled I was 'fit to plead' meaning the trial should have gone ahead in mid November, NOT LATE JANUARY 2010.

I request copy of all the medical evidence, as the patient, procured for MAPPA meetings and in particular just who employed Williams to attend 2nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court and divulge my personal details to CPS police barrister, Thomolow when I was no longer under his appalling so called 'care'?

Information requested in my December 09 solicitor's letter to the MAPPA police HQ Co-ordinator was blocked by Barbara Wilding and again by Peter Vaughan, the current Chief Constable of South Wales Police.

The South Wales Police even blocked the trial commencing and arranged for Dr Williams to address Judge Bidder, supported by Wood's report, as an 'expert' on interpreting brain scans and that he considered I had 'significant brain damage' and possible cancer and far too dangerous to start defending the 'machine gun trial'. Dr Tegwyn Williams' earlier psychiatric report recommended I be sectioned and sent to Ashworth High Security Prison, IPP, for a term of imprisonment, whilst unconvicted, of an 'indeterminate length'.

Dr Gaynor Jones

This lady attended MAPPA meetings prior to my arrest in June 09, as disclosed in the Executive Summary of seven monthly meetings, some of which having been disclosed, this late, by the Order of His Honour Judge Seys Llewelyn QC, yesterday. HM Prison Cardiff attended these meetings but as with other authorities running away as with Barbara Wilding, refusing to answer to my witness summons, in order to withhold incriminating evidence relating to this MAPPA scandal.

MAPPA was set up by the then Chief Constable purely to defend herself, at tax payer's expense, in an ongoing civil action for numerous malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments.

The HM prison, today, deny any aspect of their involvement of my MAPPA surveillance between June 09 to December 09 because they are currently using HM Treasury Solicitor, again at vast tax payers' expense, trying to overturn a £50,000 judgment, in my favour, on the pretext 'no one' in the prison ever received the Particulars of Claim, in April 09, put before MAPPA meetings or receive my 'Application for Judgment', around July 09 and dealt with by this current trial judge.

The fact I was in prison for all of July 09 and the trial judge ordered 'specific disclosure' of prison and Justice Ministry record of their respective 'audit trails', eventually to Whitehall, which has been refused, is but a small sample of the wide spread deceit I and my family have suffered under since my 1992 arrival to live in the Principality.

It all stinks, doesn't it, but who cares? Do you?

Dr Jones attended prison to examine me and received my copy letters to Drs Bagshaw, Joseph Sylvester and Tegwyn Williams to disclose that to which I am entitled, under the law, having paid my £30, last summer, with my FOI Act application, repeated an application around January2010 and redacted, again, this week, despite the 10th September 2010 letter of request by trial judge this week.

None of the above doctors, no hospital, no NHS department, no prison has released any matter identifying or supporting the alarming material 'walk on water Williams' laid before Judge Bidder QC so, please, where is it?

Try looking in the MAPPA filing cabinet first, I suggest, as it was discussed at length in October, November and December MAPPA monthly meetings chaired by senior police officers and, no doubt NHS MAPPA representative Dr Ruth Bagshaw and/or Dr Williams, both of Bridgend Gulag.

Trusting no one, any more, in Cardiff courts I took the precaution of obtaining three specific independent medical reports from outside Wales, but Dolmans have been 'lying through their back teeth', all week,, trying to fool the judge they are 'unable' to trace their 'true identity', meaning 'veracity' or 'whereabouts' of two of the three doctors, unless they wish to blame their client, the Chief Constable for failing to disclose?

All three doctors, a Consultant Radiologist, Psychiatrist and Occupational Health Physician featured heavily in MAPPA shared information during my unlawful incarceration, last year.

Many others, blogging on my web site from all around the world, were equally appalled at the 'ring fence' mentality, here in South Wales, not just within your highly lucrative 'judicial industry' but in their own chosen vocation, the medical profession.

Dolmans, police solicitors, today, are again dipping into their bottomless pockets of government resources frantic to 'sting it all out', this irritating issue of a prisoner's welfare. A swift conclusion, on these urgent medical issues, would mean the immediate cessation of easy cash, of course, for their entourage of bewigged attorneys knowing, as with their client, they are all immune to any form of criminal prosecution, whilst under the protection of 'Her Majesty's Prerogative' as 'HM officers of the court' outdated by the 1998 Human Rights Act and 1948 European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

My total hip replacement operation will not go ahead, until I have had more disclosure of relevant medical evidence, needed by my surgical team, under the responsibility of you, Alun Cairns MP, Edwina Hart AM, Jane Hutt AM and the South Wales Police, the latter having hatched the idea of my 'trading in machine guns', in the first place, for my eventual resting place in Broadmoor, to prevent incriminating evidence ever being disclosed.

NO MAN SHOULD PROFIT FROM HIS OWN WRONG.

Yours sincerely,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

FAO Stephen Jones, HM Treasury Solicitor,
to forward to Cardiff Civil Justice Centre District Judges Mr Phillips and Mr North Cardiff County Court

Another letter to HM Treasury Solicitor

19th September 2010

Maurice Kirk v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons 9CF04115

re DAMAGES CLAIM

Maurice Kirk v HM Governor, Cardiff Prison 9CF02983

re FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Dear Sirs,

On Friday before 4pm, I understand, your court received the 'Executive Summaries' of seven months of MAPPA meetings, held at police HQ, Bridgend, when, during most of that time I was under the custody of the Defendant, the HM Governor while the prison, police and Caswell forensic psychiatric prison were all around the same table considering, in depth, my current and future welfare.

The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons enjoyed complaint from the South Wales Police containing MAPPA/1968 Terrorism Act surveillance material, withheld from both the 2001 college hearing and subsequent 2004 HM Privy Council Appeal, yet to be disclosed.

The Criminal Justice and Court Services Act (2000) established the MAPPA and placed them on a statutory basis. The Criminal Justice Act (2003) re-enacted and strengthened those provisions. The legislation requires the Police, Prison and Probation Services (acting jointly as the 'Responsible Authority') in each of the 42 areas of England and Wales:

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre should also have received, on Friday before 4pm dead line, the 1st July 2010 HM Cardiff Prison form, signed on behalf of the current HM governor, denying any prior knowledge of MAPPA involvement with me and who's current affidavit, also before you, appears to portray gross variance as well as to the true situation to be proved by the previous governor, Ms West, on oath, my main witness, yet to give evidence in this case as prison staff appeared reluctant to disclose the appropriate address for witness summons service.

The HM Treasury Solicitor, in the circumstances, has agreed to 'stay' proceedings, for the recovery of my successful £50,000 Judgment for false imprisonment, following the ruling by His Honour Judge Seys LLewlyn QC that I am unfit to stand trial for a few months but fit to fight a second police 'strike out' application tomorrow that eighteen years of litigation discloses 'no cause of action'.

Interesting, isn't it, when just one click of the dreaded 'HM' fingers can order Cardiff Justice Centre, HM Prison and HM Crown Court to hand over the audit trail of my Particulars of Claim, in question, denied receiving by the prison and the medical records held by the Prison Health Centre, denied in the HM manager's recent letter and clearly referred to in the HM Court logs before most of the ten Cardiff Crown Court Judges that refused me bail knowing, full well or should have known, my full MAPPA level 3 surveillance records quoted 'chapter and verse' the HM conspiracy by the aforementioned trying to lock me away for life.

I have to forward this letter via Whitehall's HM Treasury Solicitor, to e-mail it to you all, as Mr Pring , your HM court manager, continues to ' spam block' my correspondence, on my lawful 'due process' of court papers, all part of the day to day party games, here in Cardiff courts. Mr Pring, incidentally, continues to refuse to tell me if he has now stopped sending all my court files, including other cases, to the Ministry of Justice.

Please confirm receipt needed for web site, the Court of Appeal and European Court of Human Rights.

Thank you,

John Smith MP Promises to ask Questions and 30 Year G-KERK Reunion!

Maurice Kirk — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:09:00 GMT

I drove an old £350 banger to collect my tired old D-Day Piper Cub, of 30 years ago, registration G-KERK, in a snow storm on Monday in Suffolk and towed her, after two punctures in the blizzard and with no car heater, down through London for an appointment with my local Member of Parliament, Mr John Smith MP, where I highlighted malfeasance across the board in the comic but tragic world of our British Judicial system and came away encouraged....... but not holding my breath!

Back in sunny Brittany putting stairs and log fire in the house for that party bash for life long friends, in Bastille Week, with no water or electric, save a little generator, at the moment while I try and type out a 'wee missive' for Mr Smith to work on.

Tomorrow is to be spent selling, I hope, one of the houses plus pony paddock for just 25,000 Euro in order to pay for G-KERK's suffisticated gear to possibly reach the top of Mount Everest.

Then I have to prepare a legal action against a Frenchman who stole my £20,000 aircraft engine off my almost new but slightly scratched Cessna 172R. Monsieur Phillipe Chaudet of Lyons may not have the Gendarmes calling just yet , they usually refuse to investigate an Englishman's plight, maybe because they have never forgiven us for 'Le Guerre de Cent Ans'. Rather like in South Wales at the same time, I suppose, with their Owen Glendour but Chaudet is about to have a shock and far more trouble close to home now so many aviators, injured before me, are coming forward.

If anyone knows anything on Lyons Flying Club and Chaudet, France's 'Christopher Paul Ebbs',...where is his property, his aeroplanes, his business contacts, offspring, where are they and who else has been injured? I would be grateful to know. A reward is offered. .

John Smith Esq., MP,

House of Commons,

Westminster.

4^th Feb 2009

Your Ref K/2002

Dear Mr Smith,

Abuse of Process

Thankyou for seeing me at the House of Commons yesterday and promise that you will look into these initial issues concerning our current bizarre British judicial system currently milking and running circles around the UK tax payer. Malfeasance, by those in positions of privilege, is your responsibility.

‘Vexatious Litigant' Investigation by HM Attorney General.

Until such time as this action is before a court with prosecution by Her Majesty's Attorney General, you, my parliamentary representative for the Vale of Glamorgan, should investigate my complaint of the thorough disruption this ‘required' investigation has caused to my 17 year running court actions for damages against both the South Wales Police and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. I have only just heard that the HM Treasury Solicitor has employed a team of Whitehall lawyers for the last seven years for this scandalous but lucrative exercise!
The manager of HM Administrative Court in the Royal Courts of Justice features in my appeals in 2001 and onwards when, for example, police took my unlocked car, full of dangerous veterinary drugs and for six weeks left the car on the edge of a public road near Cowbridge. I was later convicted for the related motoring offence, in my absence, due to post operation complications.

The court manager, referring to the above police incident, well over 50 on your patch, involving over 120 charges they have lost, is identified in that memo of 2003 I gave you, the manager stating:

"This and other applications merely (and are, it seems intended to) delay the appeals which should now be determined)". [I have lodged over 50 Judicial Review Applications, many clearly not even opened].

This manager had medical evidence of my inability to attend that Appeal but was still minded to write what he did with the trivial motoring conviction later used to have me struck off the veterinary register.

The ‘common purpose' to have me certified was to prevent my legal right for disclosure of evidence of the hatching of a conspiracy when South Wales Police first complained to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons in 2001. Neither party disclosed their respective investigations into my affairs. The college went so far as to refusing any disclosure at all of their contemporaneous notes, created when their team of lawyers swept across the Vale of Glamorgan interviewing my own Barry Veterinary Hospital clients and your local police. The RCVS examined police confidential records, contrary to Home Office Regulations 45/ 1987.
More disruption caused by the manager of HM Administrative Court is highlighted in the internal memos referring to my complaint to the Criminal Cases Review Commission. I showed you documentary proof that my above named defendants were to be taken into the HM Attorney's ‘confidence' to disclose any material that may secure my certification. The Extended Civil Restraint Order, ECRO, was handed down by the manager to block disclosure so, together with the 17 month delay to the Court of Appeal, to finally set down my Appeal for a jury trial, due to the HM Attorney spiriting away to lose or steal files, there was still more malfeasance.
Over 130 files, bearing my name, were rounded up just in the Wales area alone and distributed to numerous lawyers and defendants, no doubt, with some going ‘missing' so that when I employed a barrister to examine the relevant files the HM Cardiff court was made to admit, in writing, they had disappeared. I have photos and other record against HMCS to prove it.
Disappearance of files from Cardiff County Court included one labelled , Maurice John Kirk - Potential Vexatious litigant, containing clear evidence of malfeasance by too many government departments, all dependant on the immunity bestowed on them by ‘Her Majesty's Prerogative'. Mr Smith, your comments on the HM Partnership issue were particularly disturbing to me.
If ‘exhausted legal remedies', is a likely reason for your inability to investigate my complaint, it is a matter of court record Lord Justice Thomas, in the presence of my Mackenzie's Friend, Patrick Cullinane Esq., refused me a jury trial or An Abuse of Process Enquiry.

I was refused ‘leave' to the House of Lords on such a fundamental Common Law and Human Rights issue of being refused a civilian jury. Police harassment case is simple and ‘document light'. His Lordship said it was ‘hopelessly out of time' when clearly the court date stamp indicated it was not.

The HM Treasury Solicitor, RCVS and Barbara Wilding all plead ‘legal professional privilege' not to disclose evidence relating to this 7 year investigation and 10 years of police harassment, with my being gaoled and made to produce motoring documents 35 times. It all stinks, doesn't it?

Independent Police Complaints Commission

The Commission refuses to properly investigate or show disclosure as to what is being done about:

my complaints to various Metropolitan Police Stations of proven perjury before both the Judicial Committee of the HM Privy Council and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons by lawyers.

Despite proof from numerous JR hearings the Privy Council clerk refuses any further Humble Petitions.

my ‘recorded delivery' complaint, returned as ‘not known', from Cannon Street Police Station, listing criminal conduct by Penningtons, solicitors, of Gutter Lane, London.
my complaints to the South Wales Police, including perjury, arsons, thefts, assaults, break -ins into my veterinary surgery, false imprisonments, perverting the course of justice etc., etc.

Only this week, I am told Barbara Wilding, Chief Officer for the South Wales Police, is signing a sworn affidavit that she knows nothing of my being taken to court saying there was no court; she knows nothing of her police breaking into my surgery with a crow bar to re instate a police inspector's daughter in my flat; she knows nothing of my being sent to Cardiff prison due to her police ‘being unable to identify' me; she knows nothing of the deforestation caused by the paperwork created in the years of her letters with road fund tax and insurance departments in frantic attempts to get me off the road to prevent my practicing veterinary surgery; she knows nothing of her inspector signalling to his colleagues in the witness box, under cross examination, causing the jury to complain but with my subsequent imprisonment when I complained.

The IPCC documents, on this issue, are to follow this letter when I can find them secured in Brittany.

HM Information Commissioner for the 1966 Data Protection Act

This bizarre complaint to you is the way the RCVS have managed to refuse disclosing the content of their investigation, to remove me from the veterinary register, before the manager of the Administrative Court. RCVS protection under the 1967 Royal Charter orders each HM judge to do just that while I am fighting my corner relying on the 1966 Veterinary Surgeons Act, 2004 Schedule, specifically stating: the RCVS must disclose the findings of their enquiry and must place me before a court within three months! So just who drafted and who ratified both totally contradictory legislation and who is ultimately responsible if is not your government?
How can the IC rule in favour of the RCVS without even looking at the evidence withheld?
How can the RCVS get away with falsifying a magistrate's evidence without police investigation?
How can the RCVS Registrar get away with obtaining hostile police to be my ‘defence witnesses' despite a Court of Appeal Order, by Mr Justice Sullivan, still ringing in her ears?

You may note the word ‘Freemasonry' was never mentioned by either of us.

I am neither ‘street wise' nor appropriately educated to fight such deceit in a ‘gravy train' fuelled on tax payer's money, there being no accountability for those in HM ‘frilly knickers' other than to Their Maker.

Yours sincerely,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copy to:

Lord George Foulkes,

John Cameron MP,

Vince Cable MP.

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/

John Smith MP,

The House of Commons,

Westminster,

8^th Feb 2009 Your ref K/2002

Dear Mr Smith,

Abuse of Process

As I enter my 18^thlitigation year with your South Wales Police they have still not released Barbara Wilding's promised ‘sworn affidavit' and even refuse to serve their witness statements, also contrary to Court Order, in the hope I will run out of money, run out of steam or simply die.

I enclose my letter, 11^th June 2001, just as a reminder for you of the conduct of your police and your HM Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) destroying evidence and especially HHJ Griffiths Williams, insulting my intelligence with a name like that, promising me a fair trial. He refused to secure what was left remaining, contrary to previous orders for the police to disclose by HHJ Vosper QC, HHJ Bishop and many others and considered it a big joke by CPS barristers, at the time, laughing in front of my secretary in Newport Crown court whilst evidence was shredded.

BARRY VETERINARY HOSPITAL

49-53 TYNEWYDD ROAD, BARRY,

VALE OF GLAMORGAN, CF62 8AZ

Tel no: 01 446 733406 Fax no: 01 446 748500

Email: mjk@kirkflyingvet.co.uk

http://www.kirkflyignvet.co.uk/

Veterinary Surgeon:

Maurice J Kirk BVSc, MRCVS

MJK/DHG/df/2001

11 June 2001

John Smith MP

House of Commons

LONDON SW1A OAA

Dear Mr Smith,

CUSTODY RECORDS/VIDEOS

POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984

I refer to my previous letters regarding the police deliberately destroying custody records despite applications within days of my arrest to retain.

Today, in court, Judge Griffith Williams argued for over an hour trying to overrule a previous Judge's orders of 4th June, to make the prosecution produce custody videos, notebook records, PNC printouts on vehicles etc, some within 5 days.

The prosecution admitted they had not even actioned Judge Bishop's orders and admitted that various videos had been destroyed.

Clearly this hurried hearing, fixed by telephone late Friday afternoon, has followed from what these records reveal and clearly indicates a conspiracy.

Are you able to intervene?

Yours sincerely

Maurice J Kirk

Mr Smith, this very same, now Mr Justice Griffiths Williams, went on to refuse my Crown Court Appeal for ‘common assault' on the security guard, the conviction used by the afore mentioned RCVS lawyers to have me struck off the veterinary register for life. Mr Griffiths Williams ordered £11,000+ costs against me which were repeated with the RCVS £66,000+ awarded by your HM Privy Council despite the following simple facts:

1. Retired Cowbridge police inspector, Howard Davies, was made to admit before him, he struck the first blow, hard across my face, sufficient to mark and cause me to lose my balance whilst having attended as Honary Veterinary Surgeon at the Cowbridge Agricultural Show, witnessed by 20, all too frightened to intervene.
2. At Magistrates court the CPS refused to produce Davies's original statement.
3. Not one member of the agricultural committee, some clients and one my own father- in- law, knowing the vital eye witnesses, would help identify the witnesses, many being registered stall holders at the scene. Such are the politics in Wales.
4. Bridgend magistrates made written record for the Appeal that the 18 stone security guard admitted he came running down the hill to strike me from behind causing me to be knocked to the ground and witnessed by 40 plus, none of whom would testify despite the £1000 reward offered on pamphlets scattered later from an overhead by aircraft. Your environment, Mr Smith, your patch.
5. The barrister for the CPS wrote to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, following the college's refusal for him to give evidence on my behalf, confirming in unambiguous terms the above facts and had he known the relevance, before the Appeal, he would have refused to fight the case for the Crown.
6. I was actually charged with a ‘breach of the peace', extanct within a year and a day but the CPS, many months later drummed new charges burying the original despite falsifying the ‘charge sheets' by altering those originally written out by the only straight policeman in this saga, the one(s) he tried to put before the first sitting magistrates. Jackie Seals, the CPS on the day, had other ideas and refused, "for fear of incriminating myself" despite HHJ Gaskell's remarks, when I last had her in the witness box on an earlier but futile Abuse of Process Application in Cardiff Crown Court.
7. I was denied the opportunity to be ‘bound over to keep the peace' in Barry court and was served the new charges AFTER the Bridgend case had already started!

Another police incident, on your patch, just to indicate ‘common purpose':

I am face down on the tarmac in the middle of Cowbridge High Street , blocking the traffic, with two burly policemen on top of me applying handcuffs for yet another, later proved, trumped up motoring charges, the 34^th time I was made to produce documents!

I shout, as is my custom, for witnesses and get them this time and see a Volvo car with door open and ladies beside it appearing clearly shocked at the spectacle.

When cautioned I quoted the car registration number to be checked and written down.

Your South Wales Police then blatantly lied when I asked to call that registered owner and/ or driver to say what she saw. Police 'persuaded' your magistrates they could not ‘find' the driver, registered owner of the Volvo or the vehicle itself that regularly parked at the incident next to their very own sleepy police station.

The magistrates compounded malfeasance, as they have done over 118 other failed police charges, by instead of ordering disclosure, simply dismissing the case to protect.

Would the same have occurred across the border in England I wonder?

I enclose, as promised in my last letter, a random IPCC missive for your reference, Timothy Ashton clearly also feared to tread on the toes of the ‘suprema high priest', with rolled up trouser leg, in charge of Barry's Masonic lodge, the heart of all this deceit.

Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) CF 101741

90 High Holborn

London WC1V 6BH

t: 020 7166 3196

f: 020 7166 3496

timothy.ashton@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk IPCC Ref 2007/010564

6^th January 2008

South Wales Police disclosure of confidential records to Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons

Dear Sir,

1. Around 5 months ago I gave consent to the IPCC to freely investigate and disclose any material given to them of unlawful conduct by the South Wales Police in their dealings with the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons.

2. They have both apparently satisfied the Information Commissioner, for the 1998 Data Protection Act legislation, would you believe in writing, that the police and my clients of the Barry Veterinary Hospital were, between 2001-2004, ‘clients' of the college! This gives them, they say, the excuse of ‘privilege' for failing to disclose favourable witness statements, under their joint control from the ‘clients', prior to or during the RCVS and Privy Council hearings between 29^th January 2002 and July 2004. They denied they existed but now some of those witnesses have come forward to confirm perjury and fabrication of forged statements.
3. The police and college say it gave them the right to call 10+ South Wales Police to give evidence at the 2002 RCVS hearings, some without even witness subpoenas, despite the Court of Appeal Order stating they could not attend.
4. This excuse of ‘privilege' [qualified or absolute] goes further. The Police disclosed my confidential records and statements of witnesses to the lawyers, Penningtons of gutter lane and lay staff of the college, the records being sufficiently incorrect to have influenced the trial. They included criminal convictions that did not even exist. Their action was also contrary to Home Office Regulations 87/45 but who's counting?
5. At the Court of Appeal Lord Justice Thomas of South Wales obviously refused my Abuse of Process Application in this matter whilst refusing, in the same breath, any ‘legal representation' or ‘right of appeal' from his predicted decisions.
6. In 5 years have heard precisely nothing, other than acknowledgments of receipt of my around 100 written complaints to either the South Wales Police, Privy Council, your predecessors, numerous government departments and now you.

Yours,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

So, Mr Smith, until I move onto the list below, identifying further nefarious activities, all entwined in ‘The web they weave' just to exploit your tax payer, I will patiently await your findings.

The ‘Buck' Stops at Buck House?

I offer other ‘Litigants in Person', unable to get independent legal representation, a list of UK departments responsible, not necessarily in this order but to write to their respective Members of Parliament for immediate consolidated action.

•1. 4^th and 8^th Feb 2009 letters sent to John Smith MP

HM Attorney General

Independent Police Complaints Commission

Information Commissioner

•2. 2009

Criminal Cases Review Commission

Cardiff County Court/HM Court Service

RCVS/South Wales Police Conspiracy

•3. 2009

HM Crown Prosecution Service

HM Cardiff Prison

HM Home Office/Ministry of Justice

4. 2009

Vale of Glamorgan Magistrates

Cardiff Crown Court

Royal Courts of Justice

•5. 2009

HM Privy Council,

HM Government of the United Kingdom,

HM Freemasonry.

Yours sincerely,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copy to: Lord George Foulkes, John Cameron MP, Vince Cable MP

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/ & http://www.wacl.org.uk/

John Smith MP

Westminster

10^th Feb 2009

Dear Mr Smith, Your Ref k/2002

ABUSE of PROCESS

Followers from around the world are pressing me to submit to you an already published letter of mine, I had overlooked, on web site to the IPCC:

Tim Ashton Esq.,

Independent Police Complaints Commission

90 high Holborn

London WC1V 6BH IPCC Ref 2007/010564

South Wales Police and Metropolitan Police

Dear Sir,

Further to your e-mail of 1^st August 2007 I will first attempt a summary:

1. On the 19^th January 2004 before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) were Respondents in my Appeal from being removed from the veterinary register on the 29^th May 2002.

2. The RCVS had produced evidence by forging witness statements and presenting them to me as if originals.

3. The RCVS falsified witness addresses in order that I could not find them.

4. The RCVS withheld identities of favourable witnesses, interviewed by their lay staff, including all contemporaneous statements of all witnesses contacted.

5. The RCVS, in 2002, falsified information by way of plain verbiage relying on the decisions of a mentally ill, retired High Court judge, Sir John Wood , deliberately given the position of Legal Advisor to the RCVS hearing. His decision was relied upon at the Court of Appeal to prevent me from having any witnesses of fact, also contrary to law, relating to their ‘charges' (11 minor convictions, 5 of which were motoring).

6. The RCVS relied upon these convictions to have me struck off on the pretext, told by their lying barrister, Alison Foster QC, to the Downing Street entourage, because I had ‘disrespect for authority'.

7. The RCVS obtained policemen to attend the hearing, overnight, on the pretext they were defence witnesses when the Court of Appeal had already ordered none of them were allowed.

8. In October 2006, for the first time, the RCVS admitted being in the possession of favourable statements for me but they had not been disclosed as they were ‘believed' to be ‘privileged' [qualified] between their client, the South Wales Police and their Penningtons, Solicitors, Cannon Street, London.

9. Similar statements were withheld from me, even from my own veterinary clients, when the vast RCVS investigation team had descended upon South Wales.

10. The RCVS were disclosed police confidential records of my dealings with the police, the complainants in 2001 to have me struck off some of it incorrect..

11. Police records available but not all revealed, contained unlawful conduct by a small handful, to begin with, of police driven only by vengeance following their loss of 130 prosecutions based on harassment.

12. Police caused around 16 false imprisonments.

13.. No veterinary surgeon has ever or will ever again, be subjected to such sustained unlawful conduct for such trumped up nonsense.

14. Penningtons, acting for an honourable profession, conspired to pervert the course of justice from day one.

15. Penningtons even attempted to introduce the usual ingredients to have someone struck off, namely, DISHONESTY and/or MISUSE OF DRUGS and/or DRUNKENESS and/or MALPRACTICE but failed on the lot.

16. As you are only too well aware these lawyers relied on the ‘Memorandum of Understanding between Chiefs of Police and the Law Society' to guarantee them immunity to prosecution

You refer to my numerous detailed complaints in the past about the South Wales Police shuffled and binned by the Police Complaints Authority.

They were a total waste of time and were there for political purpose only.

Just why the IPCC is different and not there just to hoodwink the general public into believing there is an ‘effective remedy' only you know?

The current scale of unlawfulness in the judiciary will never be reduced by the IPCC

I will throw you just 2 complaints for starters:

Complaint A) relates to the above 16 marked paragraphs.

Both the Metropolitan and South Wales Police have refused to properly investigate or request ‘further and better particulars'.

I have received no replies from the Metropolitan Police at all.

The recorded delivery letter of complaint to Cannon Street Police Station was returned, marked ‘unknown'!

In the 6^th October2006, other police stations in London, Scotland Yard and Paddington, were visited and both refused to even write anything down with one referring me back to the RCVS court!

That same complaint was forwarded to the South Wales Police who have responded receipt and no more.

Complaint B) This is a complaint of Abuse of Process part of which is set out in my letter of complaint of the 27^th July 2007 delivered to the Barry, South Wales, police station. Their reply of 7^th August 2007 indicates no action will be taken. Am I expected to be surprised?

All dates of my communications and police identifications can be supplied by them by South Wales Police ref CJ/KE/32/M1.119/2007 of 7^th Aug 2007 letter from Bridgend HQ.

I will not be holding my breath.

Yours sincerely,

Maurice Kirk BVSc,

Barry Animal Health Centre CF62 8 AZ