But I wasn't there was I?
of today's JR hearing, written some weeks ago, had not allowed for my absence
due to ill health.
But who cares?
you can rely on here in Wales. They are taxes, death and widespread deceit
throughout Cardiff’s judiciary, while they fight for their independence away from any interference from Whitehall.
But not too
quick, chaps, not before they can persuade that same HM Treasury Solicitor’s
vast legal team in Whitehall that, between 2003 to 2008, slaved tirelessly when
last trying to have me registered as a Vexatious Litigant over RCVS and South
Police bullying. http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/HM-Treasury-Solicitors-Office.aspx
usual attempts were made to ridicule a GP's medical certificate, I had handed
in at the court door but that is what happens when their own rogue doctor is
allowed to say I am 'mad', with irreversible, probably, 'significant brain
damage' and a possible brain tumour and get away with it! 09 09 01radiologist scans report.pdf
own forensic psychiatrist was to suite their collapsing 'machine gun' trial,
the latest in string of false imprisonments. Reliant on a widespread Welsh judicial conspiracy, which even
meant using MAPPA and England’s FTAC, as they did, was bound to fail, but now,
again, compounding an ordinary GP’s work, someone just trying to do her job.
Cowbridge Health Centre, my registered practice for nearly 18 years, dropped me
like a ‘hot potato’ as soon as I won the ‘machine gun’ Caswell Clinic fiasco
and walked free from the abuse of the Mental Health Act.
Ravenscroft, Barry medical practice, very soon after, also dropped me like a ‘hot
potato’ as soon as they produced a medical report, deliberately withheld by the
Cardiff Magistrates, from the then 2nd Nov 10 presiding judge, for
the ‘relatively minor incident, as District Judge Charles called it. Charles confirmed he knew of
my being pushed down a flight of stairs by a bully boy ex-police officer, to
finish up in Casualty with a broken leg but was the judge to prevent my cross
examining, on medical grounds, any prosecution witnesses leaving it to another to
John Charles, even said the penalty for my common assault conviction carries ‘no order’ frantic, of
course, I did not appeal it as it was heard in my absence, with no cross
examination whatsoever. Yes, you guessed it, the GP’s report in 2010, as with
yesterday, was also ridiculed.
So when this NHS (Wales) GP writes that I now need a another brain scan, whatever judges, may wish to say or
do behind the scenes, how do they go about stopping it?
Only in the minds of those who were brought up in believing in
'the rule of law' feel it is time for some prosecutions around here.
So what just
did The Honourable Mr Justice Beatson have to say relevant to Article 6?
His first duty was to consider the content of this police commisioned and Crown Court used medical report now with my GP pending result of another brain scan....
witnesses sat in court
only to hear the continuing Welsh judiciary, MAPPA and HM Prison Cardiff and
NHS (Wales) cover up over a rogue NHS (Wales) doctor backed by a Swansea
Professor who also falsified medical reports. Why? Just to get an IPP on an
Englishman having failed in getting him shot. The crime, pray? For 20 years of questioning Cardiff
courts’ inherent conduct, clearly only answerable to cyberspace.
This was an
oral Judicial Review Application CO/3970/2012 from apparent failures in both Nov/Dec
11 Cardiff Magistrates and 1st/ 2nd March 2012 Crown
Court hearings concerning allegations of harassment of a NHS (Wales) level 12
consultant forensic psychiatrist who had knowingly falsified the victim’s
medical records without appropriate qualifications
Mr Justice Beatson said there was 'no challenge' in law to
the fact, in both sets of court proceedings, I was:
refused any of my legal papers in court left lying my prison cell......
exactly as in the Jan/Feb 2010 ‘machine gun jury trial’ fiasco
refused any of my legal papers from my own
solicitor, especially collected and delivered to court by so many frustrated
helpers...... exactly as in the ‘machine gun’ trial
refused the right to cross examine any
prosecution witnesses, not even the
investigating police officer...... exactly as in the ‘machine gun trial’ when allowed
only six questions
a lawyer, against my wishes, given no
defence instructions or any idea of the defence’s case (the reasonable right to detect and prevent further
criminal conduct etc)
a lawyer who refused to challenge prosecution evidence including that of the
unqualified doctor, the complainant, who had contradicted the diagnosis from doctors who carried out the
series of brain scans
refused my right to call defence witnesses, the
above doctors, for example or even to be allowed to interview, as eye witnesses
or obtain police personal note books including those
from the seven police officers who had concluded, at many of the
incidents, no crime was likely to be committed should there be
distribution of ‘Wanted’ posters.
direction of Mr Justice Wyn Williams, on Friday 1st June 2012, to make this application etc (extract from JR Form)
His Lordship went on to say, I am told, he was notifying the
next JR judge, about to deliberate over His Honour Judge Hughes QC, of
March 12 Harassment appeal, also refusing me right to cross examine any one when not even giving reason.
This next JR application is should Cardiff courts be made to ‘state a case’ as to why it was it lawful to prevent my cross examining anyone, with no prosecution evidence challenged by anyone either!
As with District Judge John Charles' 2nd November 10 'common assault' Cardiff case, appealed to Bristol Crown shortly, when the cabal first tested their new tactic concerning the
above there is far too much at stake, now, for any hope of justice.
An extract from the 1st March 12 Appeal transcript, paid for and sent to The Royal Courts of Justice on the 8th June for Mr Justice Beatson to indicate just how nefarious conduct is rife here and clearly inherent in their nature.
Despite the expensive transcript being sent onto to Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, confirmed to me by letter, Mr Justice Beatsonclearly clearly indicated, to my four witnesses at the back of Cardiff's Administrative, he never ever saw them.
It didn't end there ,apparently, he went on to I repremanded me for not complying with Mr Justice Singh's order to do just what I did!
It stinks , doesn't it? 12 06 01 JR Refusal Singh CO 3970 2012.pdf
JR 'State a Case'
12 06 18 Section 8 JR Application 18th June 2012.pdf
12 01 27 A20110290 - kirk - proc - 27.01.12.pdf
12 02 22 RO trans re YJCE Act.pdf
12 03 01 A20110290 - KIRK all proc - 01.03.12.pdf
2nd March 12 HHJ Hughes QC transcript is too large so on downloads section of this site.
2. Further enquiry,
since the Applicant was released from Cardiff prison over this latest
conspiracy, indicates there are a significant number of other victims in South
Wales with similar accounts to tell, explaining just why this doctor continues
to enjoy immunity as an ‘absolute witness’, an expression to be milked, no
doubt, in Cardiff, in the next few years, during judicial melt down when he
need only to be ‘cross examined’, even if from HM Partnership’s court own
3. Enclosed are a
few extracts and copy from a few other JR Applications (Sections 14 and 15) all
conceived in South Wales’ current climate. They all relate to this notion of an ‘absolute
witness’, a forensic psychiatrist for the South Wales Police and who, all alone, obtained the protracted incarceration of Maurice John Kirk
under Section 35 of 1983 Mental Health Act.
This list is far from being exhaustive.
Nothing was said in court, because I wasn’t there, about the
RCJ already having notified this judge, by their 19thJuly letter,
adjourn to join with this application
the pending ‘state a case’ and time for me to find a lawyer.
Oh no, of course not, just like my 23rd April
High Court hearing, while I was in prison, Civil damages 20 year running damages
claim, ‘striking out’ the police prosecution incidents where numerous Cardiff court
officials had been caught falsifying, again, court records.
Cardiff court judge and /or staff truly excelled themselves,
yesterday, in saying ‘no application’ had been made for an adjournment….
My helpers came out of the Cardiff Civil Justice building to demonstrating ‘Rick
on the Roof’ and me, to say my case 'would be' dismissed, as I should have notified the court earlier for an adjournment with my suggestion and application that it was only common sense to consolidate both JRs as 'state a case' in the Crown Court appeal was a similar but very different argument in law. I have suffered 20 years of Cardiff Civil Justice managers' campaign to distort the facts and withhold vital sent in documents to RCJ visiting judges
The judge had to adjourn for 30
minutes for another matter. Quick as a flash I was on the phone paying a court fee of £80 for
another application while the blank application form was being tricked out of
them for me to fill in. One of my portly but able ‘runners’ then alighted the
court steps, again, at break neck speed , with form filled in and with
much aplomb served the papers on the disreputable organisation.
Within a mere few nanoseconds, it seemed, a smart young but somewhat embarrassed court official came
panting out on to the pavement, grasping in his hand , ‘Chamberlain style’, a
piece of paper.
It was the
sealed/stamped court record of my latest application to consolidate this
current episode of Cardiff Cabal skulduggery.
“Your case has been dismissed and I have been sent down by
the court to reimburse the £80 court fee”, he said, as I quietly logged the time he
spoke on the back of my hand.
I looked at the piece of paper, my hurriedly but sealed by the court, filled-in
application of seven minutes earlier and made off with it to ’have it out’ with
the judge and a bloody nose did cross my mind.
But did this visiting judge know any thing of this reimbursement scam either?
I was considered too unwell to
enter court by those present, as did my GP and so returned the form
to the clerk, remonstrating I was not allowed an application but promised a copy.
No, of course the case had not yet been dismissed, it was
just bluff but was the judge aware? Had this judge ever been told of the first
application let alone the second?
‘HM Partnership’ has once again come to their rescue.
to be banned from the building, except for court room of listed case and soon even that will be blocked when I am registered a Vexatious Litigant.
After a convivial lunch with the K-Team, my helpers hear the
case, without me, culminating in the judge’s indication that the outstanding ‘state
a case’ JR or any others in the pipe line will be linked.
SO WHY WON'T ANY ONE IN CARDIFF MAGISTRATES RELEASE TO ME OR MY LAWYER OR CROWN COURT RELEASE JUST WHAT ORDERS CAME FROM THEIR ADMIN COURT TO BLOCK MY RIGHT TO APPEAL.....
At last, this week, as if in stereo, both CPS and Magistrates admit having 'no record' of any draft 1st Dec 11 'restraining order' or what ever was served on me in the cell, but identifying a high court judge, on the records, had given directions without myself being notifed thereby obstucting the appeal remedy
It stinks, doesn't it?
There leaves, of course, the small matter of the outstanding 12 03 30 Application for Case Stated .txt , to be heard shortly by yet another frilly nickered judge wheeled in to protect the gravy train.
He or she may well agree with me that this remaining, deliberately aimed at the heart of the principles upon which British justice is based, JR Application, may look a little incongruous amongst what I have just witnessed in South Wales these past twenty years but who around here any more cares?